case dr laughton against gardener in debt on Henry c for practice physic  without licence and contrary to charter if the defendant plead Henry c which  enable every skilful person to practice notwithstanding any Act to the  contrary it be no departure to reply that the mary c confirm the charter and  the Henry c notwithstanding any Act to the contrary queen if Henry c be repeal  by mary c   light Plowd Yelv lev Com dig ld raym cro car debt upon the statute  Henry c by the plaintiff as precedent of the college of physician in London  and of the corporation of physician there for that the defendant use the art  of physic in London without licence from the college there against the statute  and their charter for which he demand five pound for every month be the  penalty give by the statute the defendant plead the statute of Henry c which  enable every one to practice physic or surgery be skilful therein  notwithstanding any Act to the contrary the plaintiff reply and show the  statute mary c which confirm their charter and every article thereof to stand  in force any Act statute law or custom to the contrary notwithstanding croak  James er p the defendant hereupon demurrer first because this general clause  in this law do not restrain the statute of Henry c second that this plead be a  departure for it ought to have be show before Stephens argue for the plaintiff  first that the Act of Henry c be repeal by the statute of mary c quoad the  college of physician in London a as full as if it have be by express word  recite and repeal for when it confirm the charter of Henry and appoint that it  and every part thereof shall stand and be available the statute of Henry c can  stand with it because law m law earlier times opposite direction abrogate  Edward porter case   b second that it be not any departure because there be  not any new matter but matter plead in revive of the former or fortification  thereof and a record be show in Michaelmas term and Elizabeth Bomelins case  where the record be in the same manner as this record be and there the  plaintiff have judgement and there be none on the defendant part to argue the  court upon hear of the record give rule that judgement shall be enter for the  plaintiff unless c b