case attorneygeneral at the relation c against clarke at the roll that Nov  legacy to the poor inhabitant of saint Leonard Shoreditch hold good and to go  to the poor not receive nourishing see attorneygeneral v peacock finch  attorneygeneral v Coviber S S lib beg a foe George Cranstown by his will give  the interest of pound bank annuity to the poor inhabitant of saint Leonard  Shoreditch for ever bill information by relator to establish the charity and  after argument at bar in which it be insist for the defendant that the bequest  be void for uncertainty in the description of the person to take sir Thomas  clarke master of the roll give his opinion in favour of the charity and say  that the court have do so in many case where the expression be much more  general and uncertain that in those case the court form a judgement upon take  all the circumstance into consideration and incline in favour of the  disposition ut res to greater extent to be strong in the case of the  attorneygeneral v rance that July a legacy be give to the poor there be no  word in the will which discover what poor he mean but it appear that testator  be a French refugee the court direct the legacy to be give to the poor refugee  the attorneygeneral v brown that November the word be very general but his  honour do not mention they the word the present case be not so uncertain as in  those cite the word inhabitant bear a very general sense and may extend to  every body live in the parish but as it can not be intend that the poor  inhabitant which be ambler relieve by the parish shall have benefit by this  legacy which in effect will be give to the rich and not to the poor he declare  that the distribution of the legacy be to be confine to the poor inhabitant of  saint Leonard Shoreditch not receive nourishing of the say parish and order a  scheme to be lie before the master for such distribution the editor have  search the registrar book for the case of the attorneygeneral v rance and  attorneygeneral v brown of the first he can find no trace in the second cause  the only entry he have be able to meet with be lib Reg a foe a when the cause  appear to have come on after a appointment under the sign manual to a charity  but the word of the will do not a ear see attorneygeneral v Parker atk but the  construction be always to be make with reference to the nature of the subject  attorneygeneral v foster Ves see smith v gateward   Rep part octavo edition  vol p see Fearon v web Ves king v hall barn Cress Inst on the word householder  see king v hale ub sup parishioner see Fearon v web ub sup