Bulstrode QUELSH wife plaintiff against carpenter defendant a writ of error Ro  Rep in a writ of error to reverse a judgement give in the c b against they in  a action upon the case for scandalous word speak by the wife of the defendant  in the action upon non culp plead a verdict be find for the plaintiff S quod  Self saint ind worthy of blame judgement there give a writ of error bring to  reverse this judgement the error assign because the jury find quod Self are  ind worthy of blame the word be speak by the wife only it be urge that this be  no error but the judgement ought to be affirm and so be it hold in a case  which be mich Elizabeth b r rot Stanley plaintiff against Osbeston defendant  in a action upon the case for word bring against baron feme and the word lie  to be speak by the wife upon non culp plead the jury find quod Self are worthy  of blame a judgement give for the plaintiff upon this a writ of error be bring  in the exchequer Chamber termin Trin Elizabeth and the same error there assign  as now in this case which error be there overrule by all the judge to be no  error but that the judgement be well give and so the same be there affirm and  upon this precedent show in court by Mr man secondary the opinion of the whole  court be clear that this be no error but the judgement be well give there for  the plaintiff and so by the rule of the court the judgement be affirm notam  per coke chief justice if one be deliver to the sheriff in execution by the  king writ he be by this present in execution and in his custody without his  lie hand on he for to arrest he and so be h fol fol and so have always the  constant practice be as I have observe notam by coke chief justice for a rule  observe in take of bail upon a writ of error bring if the error assign be  matter in law then the use be to take bail of the party but if the error be  upon matter in fait then the use be not to take bail before this matter in  fait be try and so be the difference Bulstrode er p