case the king vers thorp and other in b r a information against defendant for  malicious conspire together and inveigle a young man heir to a considerable  fortune into a disgraceful marriage holt SC Mod SC comb SC Carth SC keb keb  cro car lev side raym Mod information that the defendant maliciose c  procurarunt son to hang to go away de house father Himself and then persuaseru  compulserunt procuraveru he to be make drink and so inveigle he to marriage c  Northey argue that no such information lie for a father bath no action against  a person for persuade his son to marry cro Elizabeth Leon SC and marriage be a  honourable state and for that reason it be no offence to persuade any one to  enter into it so it be no offence to the king to persuade the son of any  person to depart from his father without a special allegation in what manner  and a information never be maintainedbefore for a matter of such a nature  wright sergeant contra here be a great offence for if a man bath his son and  heir inveigle into a marriage with a woman of ill fame by such wrongful way  his family be ruin without possibility of reparation and afterward in mich  term W it be argue by William of GraysInn that a information lie not for the  information suppose that the infant marry be under the age of eighteen year  and yet it be possible be may be above the age of fourteen year which be the  age of discretion at which a man may contract marriage or perhaps be may be  under the age of fourteen year if it be intend that the infant be above that  age then be he enable to contract matrimony and it be lawful for he to do it  so then to persuade he to that which it be lawful for he to do be no offence  the accessary can be guilty where the principal be comens innocent and this  can be by reason of the law of nature that the son be under ware of the father  for if it be so the young son will be also under his ware but the father can  have no action but only quare son to hang to seize and carry off but this be  by our law which give the guardianship until the age of fourteen year and if  the heir be under the age of fourteen year then the marriage be voidable and  so no prejudice Darnal sergeant on the other side insist that the father shall  have the guardianship of the son until the age of twentyone by the law of  nature and that such a inveiglement be a offence although the father have not  his action for it c holt c j tell William that his last point destroy the  foundation of his first for in the first he urge that the son at the age of  fourteen year have power to contract marriage and for that reason the persuade  he to do it be no offence and in the second that such persuade be not a  offence under the age of fourteen year for that be bath then no power to  contract but he say that marriage under the age of fourteen year be good if it  be not disarm unto and holt say that the father isA father continue guardian  to his son till he arrive at the age of year in respect to his person but not  to his land   Litt a father continue guardian to his son till he arrive at the  age of year in respect to his person but not to his land   Litt guardian to  the son until the age of twentyone year by our law which comens er p be find  upon the law of nature but our law give remedy only in the case of a old son  by reason that it make provision onlyfor he No judgement be give in this case  and I have be unable to discover how the matter be conclude comens de term  sanct trin will III in b r