case the queen against pugh and other a inquisition for a riot need not  special pursue the word of the statute Henry c but may conclude general contra  form to cause to stand S c holt a inquisition be take before two justice of  the peace against the defendant for a riot upon the statute of Henry c and the  caption be inquisition captan pro owner queen in come h super sacrament c  dvodecim estimable et of man c who adtunc et ibidem impannela jurat et triat c  ad inquirend de riotis contra form stat general Brotherick take exception that  in the whole inquisition there be not a word of the statute of Henry c and  quote CromptonCromp just a and Lombard lamb just b that precedent on this  statute modern particular describe the statute and show the whole proceed of  the justice to be precise pursuant to it say non allocatur for per curian the  justice have power to inquire of all riot and rout whatsoever by this statute  and if a forcible entry be make by three for few can commit a riot the justice  may inquire of it by the statute of Henry c and fine accord to the statute of  Henry c and award restitution for a subsequent statute that give a great  punishment do not take away the power give by a precedent statute see king v  cator burr and king v Davies case in crown law that a statute inflict a less  punishment be a virtual repeal of a statute inflict a great punishment for the  same offence c and the inquisition may be take anywhere else as well as upon  the place but if the information give to the justice be that the riot continue  they ought to go and convict they and record it upon the view under penalty of  a hundred pound but they may inquire where the riot do not continue any time  within a month but per holt chief justice if they will not inquire within the  month they forfeit the penalty but notwithstanding they may inquire after  videlicet when they have issue a precept within the month to inquire modern er  p and here per curian if a number of people meet to do a unlawful act and  after they have meet they do it not that be a unlawful assembly but not a riot  also if they meet to do a act that in itself be not unlawful but be not a act  of violence or force and they do it that be no riot but a unlawful assembly  and upon this foundation the assemble in conventicle in the time of king  Charles the second by the better opinion be hold no riot