c mrs ashs case S c Prec in Charles Eq can ab lunatic she be find a lunatic  the custody of her be grant to mrs Windham her sister and be in custody Mr  packer by force break in upon her keeper and get her to church and there marry  her and it be hold in this case saint that the marriage of a lunatic such  marriage be now absolute void by stat Geo c do not determine the custody of  her for the custody may be continue notwithstanding the marriage and if a  woman that be marry afterward become lunatic the custody of her may be grant  and so it be do in the case of Mr fane of the temple the wife have a separate  power by inquisition be find a lunatic and the custody of her grant at first  to some friend of Mr fane and afterward to Mr fane himself and so now  continued So if the husband become a lunatic the wife unless some very decide  objection be prove will be appoint committee of his person lady Wenmans case p  wms dly it be hold that a lunatic during his lunacy be not capable of marriage  but in lucid interval he may and if such a marriage shall he have during the  lunacy the civilian hold that by subsequent consent it may be make good as the  marriage of a infant before the age of discretion may be make good by a  subsequent assent dly that the prerogative of the crown touch idiot and  lunatic be palace service before Oxenden v Crompton Ves jun ex part Grimstone  Amb though Lord coke in his d Inst p express a different opinion which however  he contradict in beverley case Rep the statute for that purpose and it be a  duty original incumbent on the crown to take care of those who be not capable  of take care of themselves thly that if a lunatic recover his sense he ought  to be deliver out of custody and for that purpose may petition to be inspect  but that it be not to be try by inspection only freeman but by examine witness  also to see whether her be restore to her sense be of any continuation and so  like to hold ex part Ferrars mosel ex part Holyland Ves one Grenos case be  cite who marry during his lunacy and commitment and afterward that marriage be  dissolve in the spiritual court in my Lord some time and my Lord coke opinion  deny that a lunatic be capable of marriage in this case mrs ash and her  husband and the parson and Mr packer be commit for their contempt smart v  tailor Mod to the court in carry on this matter while she be in the custody of  the court but she and her husband be commit together for it appear that she be  mighty recover per consortium husband and be very sedate in court but not  discharge till further trial freeman er p