case the king against the inhabitant OF the parish OF AICKLES apprentice in  law be not assignable but if under the assignment he serve his time in another  town he gain settlement there S c salk S c ld ray S c Const a boy set out a  apprentice to a master in one parish who by write do assign and turn he over  to another master where he serve his time in the parish of a and the boy be  now poor the question be whether he have gain a legal settlement in a and a  order of two justice be for remove he to another town as not legal settle in a  because a apprentice be not assignable in law per curium it be very true a  apprentice be not modern report assignable yet here the boy serve during his  apprenticeship in the parish of a and if one master make a contract with  another that the other shall have the service of his apprentice that be good  between themselves and though the word be grant assign and turn over a the  same point be at the same time decide in the case of king v Fenwick note to  original ms and see king v hay ante and Mr Consts edit of bott p l vol to a  vide ante vol p modern report er p which indeed can alter the legal interest  of the apprentice yet it amount to a agreement that he shall serve the other  during the time like the case where one assign over a bind to another which in  its nature be not assignable over but if he do assign it over it be a good  agreement that the assignee shall have the money to his own use and so be the  case of deering v Farringdon a where one be to receive a proportion of damage  from the town of hamburg and it be stipulate that the town shall pay so much  to the party that have suffer one whereof assign his part or proportion of the  reparation to another notwithstanding which he after receive the money to his  own use whereupon the assignee bring covenant against he and the word of the  deed be only appointed et transposuit and though the thing in its nature be  not assignable yet it be enough to bind the assignor to suffer the assignee to  enjoy it a so here in strictness a apprentice be not assignable over yet by  agreement between the master it may be so far do as that covenant lie for a  interruption of enjoyment of his service then the apprentice serve upon such a  assignment be a good service of a apprentice and therefore sufficient to give  he a settlement in a and the order be quash b