case Pepys against wine Hilary term car roll in a action for word lie to have  be speak on that January last a declaration entitle of Hilary term general  without any special memorandum be good case for scandalous word lie to be  speak the twentyeighth of January last and the declaration be of Hilary term  general without any special memorandum of the time of fill the declaration Mr  Thompson in arrest of judgement it appear by the record that they have no  cause of action at the time of the commencement of the action the declaration  be general of Hilary term which be the first day of the term quaere cur to  waver in opinion some say a special memorandum ought to be make thereof as to  the time other say not some say the action commence from the fill of the bail  in case it be by bill but in case of original it be to be account from the day  of sue it which be a particular certain day but bail be now file general of  such a term and no day specify as former a the declaration state two set of  word as speak on different day first a priest innuendo a Popish priest give  the eucharist and extreme unction to sir John Knightley second I see a Popish  priest anoint he innuendo extreme unction and give he the sacrament of the  eucharist and on a motion in arrest of judgement the court resolve that the  word altogether be actionable for that one part explain the meaning and the  scandal of the other for the first word a priest give he the eucharist must  mean a Popish priest and he to who it be give must be a papist because Popish  priest never give their sacrament to any that be not complete and perfect  papist and that the last word anoint he be speak of one that be sick and apply  by a Popish priest can be intend any thing else but extreme unction and  judgement be give for the plaintiff SC lev but it do not appear that any  judgement be give on the writ of error it have however be determine that to  call a justice of peace Irish privy counsellor deputylieutenant and member of  parliament a papist be actionable roe v sir t Clarges Mod ante sir John cutler  v friend show how v Prinne ld ray SC Mod SC vin Abr SC brown case parliament  shower KB er p shower KB Mr holt in Michaelmas term follow move it again that  the proceed here be by way of bill and no special entry of the fill of the  bill it must then be before the cause of action commence for that it shall be  intend to be a bill of the first day of the term Mr Bonython it be well enough  and so be it rule in the case of Manne v Adam a in progers case b in the case  Bateman v porter in Lord sander time and in dobson v bell d and it have be  rule good both on evidence and on motion in arrest of judgement but Mr holt  urge it can not be good without a special entry as to the day in the  memorandum and cite the case of Hutchinson who tam v Thomas e a information of  that term general the defendant plead that before the exhibit of that  information there be another exhibit videlicet the twentythird of October and  hold a ill plea Wythens justice hold it ill in the principal case but  Jefferyes chief justice and the two other judge hold it well enough and accord  judgement be give for the plaintiff