case Howarth cook and John cook vers sarah cook widow hannah and sarah her  daughter infant in scacc whether a defendant after a decree against he shall  before execution sue by alienation prevent the plaintiff from take his land  upon the sequestration Eq Abr pl S c on a bill for a personal duty a decree be  against Sarah cook the mother who comens er p stand out in contempt but before  sequestration against her she be tenant for life remainder to by feoff date  the that of September feoff trustee in consideration of S and in consideration  of part of a considerable sum recite to be due to her daughter and thereby  convey her estate for life to the say trustee in trust for her daughter and  their heir afterward sequestration be take out against the mother and thereon  this estate be seize by the sequestrator but on a application to the court by  order the that of January it be refer to the deputy to examine into the  conveyance and see what interest the defendant have in the estate who report  that price and his wife for he have marry Hannah the old daughter and Sarah  cook the other daughter have not make out any sufficient title whereby to  impeach or affect the plaintiff seizure of the say estate by virtue of the  sequestration issue in this cause comens to this report the plaintiff take  exception in write as of late direct first that before the decree the estate  be settle for the jointure of the mother for her life that the feoff be make  before the sequestration issue and make good fide for a valuable consideration  it be insist by Mr Wilbraham that the decree do not bind the land nor be any  lie upon it but only bind the person of the defendant it must be agree that a  decree in a court of equity be no court of record do not in point of law bind  the land but the person only so it be say per the master of the roll in the  case of Bligh all vers earl of darnly Trin p wms Eq Abr pl SC a the defendant  father contract before a master for the purchase of a three part of cobhamhall  in ken and it be insist by the attorneygeneral that the debt by this contract  be due by a decree it be in the nature of a judgement and will bind the real  asset in the hand of the heir but the master of the roll say that the purchase  of land decree to be sell create no debt by the decree it be only Payable by  the order of the court but when it be say that a debt by a decree be equal to  a judgement salk vern ves b and to be pay next to a judgement vern c this be  intend out of the personal estate for a decree for a debt do not bind the real  estate ves forest d act only in mask not in remember and the remedy to affect  land be only by sequestration for a contempt and a decree for a debt never  affect the land in the hand of the heir and this be say long ago by knightly h  cite in roll Abr and it be agree in roll Rep but the question in this case be  whether the defendant after a decree against he shall by alienation before  execution sue prevent the plaintiff from take these land upon the  sequestration comens it be agree hill car in the case of Colston vers gardener  Ch Cas that he can do so if the alienation be voluntary without consideration  and so it be hold where after a decree to a account of a personal estate and  on exception to the master report it be defer and in the mean time the  defendant on treaty of a marriage for his son but before it be conclude convey  his estate to his son to enable he to make a jointure and to pay his debt but  with power of revocation if his son die without issue so in the case of squib  and Snelling Ch Cas it be say a purchaser from I S who have a decree against  he in chancery for land shall be bind by the decree though he have never  notice of it though the decree bind the person and not the land so where a  decree be make by commissioner of charitable use and exception be make to it  in chancery where the decree be afterward confirm but the defendant in the  mean time have convey his land to raise portion for child but with a power of  revocation the land shall be sequester for money decree pasch car Ch Cas a  Harding and edge so where the defendant be decree to pay a sum of money or  deliver up possession of a house and land in Edmonton make a assignment of the  house and land to a real creditor on bind for satisfaction of his debt of his  own free will without privity of the creditor after the time set for pay the  money or deliver possession the court decree the possession of the house and  land without regard to the convey comens er p once self and Maddox vern and  the case of Colston and gardener above be cite and allow so where a decree be  that the devisee shall enjoy against the heir a purchase in a mortgage then  purchase the equity of redemption of the heir have notice of the will which be  say to be destroy the court determine that he shall be bind by the decree  finch vers Newnham Eq Abr pl S c b vern comens de boundary pasch gm