case LAUNDY versus williams Lord chancellor king Eq can ab pl Eq can ab pl vin  ab if I devise a legacy of pound to a Payable at his age of and a die before  a s executor or administrator shall not have that legacy till such time as a  have he live shall have attain and my executor shall have the interest in the  mean time but if I give a legacy to a of pound Payable at his age of and if he  die before then to b and a die before b shall have the legacy present and not  stay till such time as a shall have come to Samuel Launde have several child  by will date the that of November devise to his son Samuel Launde pound to be  pay at his age of twentyone to his son Whitmore Launde pound at his age of  twentyone to his son Edward Launde yet a infant pound at his age of twentyone  to his daughter peer William the plaintiff whether Launde pound at her age of  twentyone and make his wife the defendant Rebecca executrix and residuary  legatee there be a clause in the will that if any of his son and daughter  shall die before his her or their respective age of twentyone then the legacy  or legacy of he her or they so die shall be pay to the survivor or survivor of  such child the daughter be pay her legacy of pound have attain her age also  the plaintiff Samuel have attain hisage of twentyone receive his legacy of  pound Whitmore Launde die at the age of eleven and now the plaintiff Samuel  Launde the old son and whether the daughter who have attain their age of  twentyone bring this bill against the executrix Rebecca to have their  twothirds of Whitmore Laundys pound pay over to they Edward Launde the other  son be yet a infant of about twelve year old for the defendant it be insist  that the plaintiff come before their time forasmuch as they ought to stay for  their share of the decease infant legacy of pound until the decease infant  shall have come to the age of twentyone year in case he have live for saint  the word then if any of the child shall die before twentyone then the legacy  of he her or they so die shall go to the survivor or survivor must be intend  in such case or if such fact happen and be not to be construe in relation to  any time or to signify that on the death of any of the child then peer William  er p at that time the legacy be to be pay dly legatee over in case any of the  first legatee shall die before twentyone be only substitute and can not be in  a better condition than the original legatee be consequent as these can not  take till their age of twentyone by the same reason they that come in their  place shall not take until the original legatee may peer William have they  live have attain that age dly ft be to be presume the testator have consider  with himself when and at what respective time his estate will bear the payment  of these several legacy and that he have determine the legacy to his child  shall be pay at their age of twentyone and in the mean time the residuary  legatee shall have they and that it be unreasonable the delegate under the age  of twentyone shall accelerate the payment or prejudice the residuary legatee  who otherwise will certain have have the benefit of the interest until the  decease infant shall have come to twentyone and of this opinion be the Lord  chancellor who pronounce his decree accord but on the follow day Mr solicitor  general mention the matter again and insist that it have be determine  otherwise and that the difference be betwixt the executor or administrator of  the first legatee and the devisee over if I give a legacy to a Payable at his  age of twentyone and he die before his executor or administrator claim under  such legatee and stand in his place shall not be entitle to this legacy until  such time as the infant legatee will have attain his age of twentyone if he  have live and that this have be solemnly determine as well on a appeal to the  house of lord vern as also by the two chief justice and the master of the roll  upon a appeal to the king in Council from a decree in Antigua ante but where I  devise a legacy of pound to a infant at his age of twentyone year and if the  infant die before twentyone then to I S here I S do not claim under the infant  but the devise over to he be as a new substantive bequest and be peer William  to be pay on the death of the infant under the age of twentyone vide Anderson  also vern Papworth v more express in point wherefore on these authority Lord  chancellor vary the decree which he have before pronounce and order two three  of this pound to be pay to the two plaintiff the brother and sister of the  dead legatee Whitmore Launde and give interest for their two three from the  death of the say infant for though it be object that this be a new legacy the  executrix ought to have a year time for the payment of it yet the court hold  that must be intend to be from the death of the testator whereas in this case  the testator have be dead several year Reg lib b fol note the rule in equity  seem by this resolution to be settle accord vide Harrison v buckle stram  Chester v painter ante boycot v cotton atk Roden v smith Amb green v Pigot bro  c c Crickett v dolby Ves say qure where the legacy be Payable out of land  Feltham v Feltham ante and where the legacy carry interest the executor of the  decease legatee shall have the legacy present fonnereau v fonnereau Ves but  the effect of a direction for maintenance be not equivalent to a gift of the  interest Pulsford v hunter bro c c hanson v Graham Ves