case wainwright against bagshaw after the allowance of churchwarden account by  the minister and parishioner the spiritual court have no jurisdiction SC barn  SC stram SC Cunn SC and notorious facts Mr Abney show cause why a prohibition  shall not go to the spiritual court of Litchfield to stay a suit there against  the now defendant churchwarden to which they plead a allowance of their  account by the minister and a great majority of the parishioner and inhabitant  and that plea refuse below he insist the plea do not pursue the canon the that  canon of those make in the year a which require such account to be give before  the parishioner and inhabitant whereas a mere inhabitancy in a parish will not  give any right to a person to concern himself in allowance of the account he  insist that there be many extravagant item in the account such as ought not to  be allow in justice to the parish which they be ready to verify by affidavit  and that this be the only remedy they have of set this matter right Mr strange  on the other side insist that after a allowance of the account by the minister  and the parishioner the spiritual court bad no jurisdiction however  extravagant the charge may be upon the parish and cite dr Prideaux of the  office of churchwarden modern er p Mr Dennison cite the case of Nutkins  churchwarden of Hammersmith v Robinson and Carey in the exchequer Michaelmas  term Geo and the case of Hawton churchwarden of saint Alban woodstreet v  Kendrick and other last easter term in the same court where it have be so  determine and Lutw Lord Hardwicke chief justice the jurisdiction of the  ordinary extend no far than to compel the churchwarden to come to a account  before the minister and parishioner for he can himself take the account or  enter into a enquiry into the reasonableness or extravagance of the charge if  the party interest acquiesce in it and it will be a very absurd thing to  suffer that court to proceed when the sentence against the churchwarden can  only be quod competent and that have be do already and shall it go again  before the parishioner the account may be allow in the same manner and the  suit prove of no consequence at all the word parishioner and inhabitant must  be construe conjunctive to mean only such inhabitant as be parishioner the  rule be make absolute see Snowden v herring bunb Nutkins v Robinson bunb and  Adam v bush stram leman v Goulty term Rep b