case pain case if a prisoner escape from a commitment under a order of  chancery for hinder the execution of a decree be can be retake on a  escapewarrant under the statute Ann c S c stram Thomas pain be commit by a  order of the court of chancery for hinder the execution of a decree upon his  father he remove himself to the Marshalsea and thence make his escape and be  take again on a escape warrant a motion be make to supersede the warrant and  that Thomas pain may be discharge this be not within the statute I Ann c that  grant escape warrant in such like case for that say in the preamble that  diverse person commit by the queen court of record at Westminster upon action  for the recovery of debt or damage or for contempt in not perform order or  decree make in court of equity have escape and therefore for remedy thereof it  be enact that if any person commit render or charge into the prison of the  queen bench or the fleet either in execution or upon mesne process or upon any  contempt in not perform such order or decree by any of her majesty court at  Westminster c shall escape any one of the judge of the court where such action  be enter or judgement and execution be obtain c may grant a warrant to seize  and retake such person c this be only for the obstruction of a execution of a  decree reeves this be within the reason if it be not the word of the Act it be  obstruct the execution of a decree Pratt chief justice to bring this case into  the statute it must be in not obey a order or decree the contempt may be say  to be of a order of chancery yet not such as in the Act mention for it be not  perform a order which the Act say must be therefore the warrant ought to be  supersede for this be a Act we can extend by equity modern report er p powys  justice I think it be within the meaning of the Act but it be so penal as to  extend to restrain liberty we can go beyond the word Eyre justice of the same  opinion fortescue justice it be neither within the word nor within the meaning  of the Act which be only to secure property to person concern not to vindicate  the public contempt of court this be modern report not proper a order but  rather a judgement and he be not to do anything but suffer the word of the Act  and in execution seem the near to this but they be still relative to debt and  contract the court the warrant must be supersede but it appear that he escape  out of our gaol we ex duty remand he to it again