case thompson against slicer amendment make in a action from Ireland on a  promissory note by insert in the record do recover instead of shall recover  action on the case in Ireland on a promissory note by a endorsee against the  drawer which go down to trial and the jury find a verdict that the plaintiff  shall recover against the defendant for his damage the sum of one hundred and  sixty pound four shilling and sixpence and for his expense and cost sixpence  the judgement thereupon be in these term it be therefore consider c that the  plaintiff shall recover against the say defendant the say sum of one hundred  and sixty pound four shilling and sixpence by the say jury in form aforesaid  find as also the sum of fifteen pound twelve shilling and ten penny for his  damage which he sustain as well for the defendant not perform his promise and  assumption aforesaid as also for his expense and cost this judgement be remove  by writ of error into this court modern er p and now it be move to make two  amendment by virtue of the car c the one that the word shall recover in the  judgement be alter to do recover the other that the sum of one hundred and  sixty pound four shilling and sixpence be amend and that sixpence give for  cost by the jury be add to it and that it be make one hundred and sixty pound  five shilling it be object to the amendment that the court can amend such  judgement as be give in Ireland the word of the statute be that if any verdict  be give in any action in any of his majesty court of record at Westminster the  county palatine of Chester Lancaster and Durham or in Wales no judgement  modern shall be stay or reverse c and that these word do not extend to Ireland  it be far object that if Irish judgement be amendable here see now the statute  Geo c and Geo c a yet these be such fault as be not amendable anywhere within  the car lee chief justice I apprehend that it bath be settle in the case of  Byrne v Byrne mich term Geo b that a judgement give in Ireland may be amend  upon error here in England for it can be amend in Ireland after it have be  remove here by writ of error for upon error the record itself and not the  transcript be remove and the record be so far a record of this court that we  can transmit it to Ireland Yelv and though the first word of the statute  extend only to the court of Westminster Chester Lancaster and Durham and Wales  yet there be general word in the close of the first section that take in  Ireland the word be that all such omission as be before enumerate in that Act  of parliament and all other matter of the like nature not be against the right  of the matter of the suit nor whereby the issue or trial be alter shall be  amend by the justice or other judge of the court where such judgement be or  shall be give or whereunto the record be or shall be remove by writ of error  the case of Byrne v Byrne be a writ of error out of Ireland upon a judgement  in dower in which there be two pity and it be move to strike out one which  amendment be accord make so in sir t Jones a judgement in Ireland be amend in  this court though before the make of this statute as to the other objection  that judgement be not amendable within this statute because judgement be not  express name in the enumerate part of the statute I think they be amendable  within the general word that all other matter of the like nature with those  particular enumerate not be against the right of the suit nor whereby the  issue or trial be alter shall be amend accord several judgement have be amend  thereby which I shall mention in this case it be therefore plain that not only  a judgement but a judgement out of Ireland may be amend it may be proper to  consider the amendment pray for upon the present judgement the first be that  the word shall may be alter to do there have sure be such amendment as this in  the court the case of Forster v Blackwell barn note c be upon a judgement  enter up in these word that the plaintiff ought to recover which be amend to  do recover and the case of blackey and Birmingham in this court easter term  Geo be that the plaintiff shall recover and the judgement be alter to do  recover the second be that the judgement may be amend from the verdict and  that the sixpence give for cost in the verdict and modern omit in the  judgement may be now add in the judgement this last seem to I very much to  weekend upon this whether there be sufficient authority to amend upon the foot  of misprision and I be of opinion that there be for there be enough find upon  the verdict to enter up the judgement in the form it be now pray to be and I  think the case of full v smith mich term Geo a be strong in point that be a  action of trespass in which the jury find the defendant guilty as to part of  the trespass and as to the residue not guilty upon the enter up the judgement  that part of the verdict which acquit the defendant be modern er p omit and  yet it be hold amendable as a misprision because there be sufficient find with  the verdict to have guide the entrance of the judgement by and the verdict be  a sufficient warrant or authority to amend the judgement by the judgement be  ground upon the verdict chapel page and wright justice agree but the court  notwithstanding say they will consider far of it and now on the last day of  the term lee chief justice deliver the opinion of the whole court in these  word it be our unanimous opinion that the amendment pray for may be grant the  true distinction in relation to amendment of judgement before the statute of  car seem to be this that where mistake in judgement be in any matter in which  the clerk have no instruction in the record to guide the clerk in his entry of  the judgement such mistake be not amendable exclusive of the statute of  Charles the second because they be consider as error and fault of the court  but if the clerk bad sufficient instruction his mistake be amendable before  the statute of Charles the second there be numberless authority to prove this  distinction but I shall only cite two or three cro Elizabeth roll Abr vent lev  the first amendment which pray that the word shall be alter to the word do  seem to be a case that will fall under the determination of make no amendment  as be a fault of the court but this mistake be make amendable under the  statute of Charles the second the statute give some instance of judgement that  can not be amend before this statute as the entry of a to take in hand instead  of a pity can not be amend before this statute as be a fault of the court so  concession be for to look at closely be can not be amend for that be not the  language of the court the objection to the present amendment be within the  statute of Charles the second be that this statute as to the first part be to  be consider as a statute of Jeofails and not of amendment and to be sure that  be true for the word be that no judgement shall be arrest for want of form c  that the statute then name the court and confine they to Westminster the  county palatine and Wales but at the end of the statute there be more general  expression which modern make it a statute of amendment it be then object that  the word such judgement must relate to the judgement give in the court before  mention in the beginning of the statute videlicet Westminster c and that they  can extend to judgement give in Ireland but we apprehend the jurisdiction this  court have always exercise over judgement in Ireland will bring it within the  case of other inferior court and it be a rule that wheresoever the court below  have power to make amendment in its record this court have the like power by  law to make such amendment when the record be remove into this court by writ  of error now this statute be express enact in Ireland and as we be of opinion  the court in Ireland may make such amendment by the statute we also may do it  and we see no difference between the court of king bench in Ireland and the  court of common plea in England as to this purpose for we have exercise this  power of amend the record of both court indifferent there be precedent of our  amend judgement in Ireland in roll Abr vent what lee chief justice add be to  the same purpose as what he have above mention on the former day and it be now  determine to grant the amendment as pray