case Bramhall against hall feme covert have power to convey her estate after  her death convey it by lease and release to take effect after her death she  afterward join with her husband in levy a fine to different use the lease and  release hold to have no effect and the fine operate see wright v Englefield  next case Tomlinson v Dighton p W Rippon v Dawding post spring v Barnard bro c  c Ross v ewer atk lib Reg a foe b S c Eden hill ms in chancery that June on  the marriage between George Bramhall and whether his wife who be then a widow  and seize of a estate in fee article be enter into by which George Bramhall  covenant that whether his intend wife shall have power by deed or will to  dispose of her estate after her decease to any person whatsoever and that he  will do any act to confirm the same ambler after marriage the wife by lease  and release recite the article convey her estate to trustee after her death to  the use of her natural son for life with remainder over afterward the husband  and wife levy a fine of the premise and declare the use different from those  of the release Lord Northington chancellor hold that the wife have the legal  interest in her the lease and release be not good to pass her estate either as  a conveyance or as a execution of a power and that the estate pass by the fine  whether Bramhall have a natural son who intermarry with the plaintiff and by  indenture of lease and release of rd and that of September recite the article  whether Bramhall without her husband in consideration of a portion then have  or to he have by the say Thomas Bramhall the natural son with Elizabeth his  then wife and for natural love and affection for her son and provide a  maintenance and jointure for the say Thomas and Elizabeth after her decease  and settle the premise by virtue of her power grant c the premise to trustee  from and after the death of herself to the use of the say Thomas Bramhall the  natural son for life remainder to Elizabeth his wife for her life for her  jointure with diverse remainder over but if the say Thomas Bramhall shall die  and leave no issue by the plaintiff then that the say trustee shall stand  seize of one moiety to the use of the right heir of the say whether Bramhall  and of the other to the use of the plaintiff for life with like remainder over  in whether Bramhall together with her husband levy a fine of the premise and  by indenture of that November the use ere declare to whether Bramhall for life  remainder as to one moiety to trustee upon certain trust as to the other to  the same use as be limit by the deed of omit only the limitation to the  plaintiff for life George Bramhall and whether his wife and Thomas Bramhall  the natural son be dead in Elizabeth his widow bring this bill to be let into  possession of the estate for her life and for a account of the rend c claim  under the deed of the defendant by their answer state that no portion be pay  with the plaintiff as recite in the deed on the part of the plaintiff it be  admit that the deed of be void at law but it be contend that equity ought to  supply the defect and Fothergill v Fothergill Freem Eq can ab smith v Ashton  Ch can stapilton v stapilton atk be cite for the defendant it be say that the  plaintiff be a mere volunteer and have therefore no equity on which to ground  her application that there be no meritorious consideration to induce the court  to supply the defective execution and Fursaker v Robinson pre Ch be cite where  the court refuse to supply a surrender of a copyhold for a natural daughter on  ground of there be no consideration of blood vane v Fletcher p wms shaw v  standish vern be also cite the Lord chancellor be of opinion that the  plaintiff be not entitle to relief as it do not appear that she be any thing  more than a volunteer that as nothing will pass by the deed at law equity can  not interfere to supply the defect especial against ambler er p those who  claim under a subsequent effectual execution of the power and legal conveyance  of the estate and he say he know of no case where a defective execution of a  power have be supply in equity in favour of a natural son to who no  meritorious consideration can arise and dismiss the bill to hill ms see the  case more at large in Mr Eden report Vol p Mr Sugden in his treatise on power  Edward p give it as his opinion that Lord Northington be not correct in hold a  consideration necessary in this case the true principle which equity lend its  aid be that the agreement have be make on ought to on marriage the husband  will be compel to make a settlement and he cite Ripon v Dawding post t Rep  Dillon v grace Sch Lef George v post the follow observation on this case be by  sergeant hill ms this case will have be clear right have it arise on a  covenant to stand seize Ch Prec but vide p wms by which it seem that the lease  and release be a good execution of the power and if so it seem by salk that  the use will not result at law but queer et with ms as to equitable trust but  as there be a fine and deed declare the use in favour of the bastard it seem  he have a clear title