buckley versus collier mich W m B R rot Mod baron must bring action alone for  work do by the wife during the coverture unless there be a express promise to  the wife Mod case c Danv part pi Carth S C salk Wilson c way Bl Rep cro James  baron and feme declare that the defendant be indebt to they for work do by the  wife in make he a peruke he promise to pay and have not pay ad financial loss  Self c to this there be a frivolous plea and upon that a demurrer the  plaintiff cite cro cro cro but rely principal upon Burchets case per cur  Burchets case differ there be a express promise to the wife and to that the  husband assent by bring a action thereupon but here be no express promise lie  to the wife here be nothing but the promise in law and that must be to the  husband who must have the fruit of his wife labour for which he may bring a  quantum to deserve also the advantage of the wife work shall not survive to  the wife but go to the executor of the husband for if the wife die her debt  fall upon the husband and therefore so shall the profit of her trade to the  husband executor but this must be intend of work do during the coverture and  not after judgement pro def a a the husband and wife may join on a promise to  the wife to pay her if she perform a cure Brashford v Buckingham cro James on  a promise to the wife in consideration of pay by her to marry her daughter  Pratt v tailor cro Elizabeth on a promise in consideration of a marriage have  at the defendant request to pay the wife per annum during coverture Hilliard v  Hambridge Allen style on a promise in consideration of board defendant  daughter her be teach needlework by the wife and bind enter into by the  husband to a to give they so much fountain v smith side they may join in  covenant in a lease to they Bulst anon Br baron and feme pl e or against a  lessee when the reversion be grant to husband and wife Dict per cur Brett v  Cumberland cro James Bulst roll the decision in that case be that the husband  may sue alone r that husband and wife and a three person may join in covenant  on lease of land whereof the wife and the three person be tenant in common  Alebury v whally Str they may join or the husband may sue alone on a bind to  the wife after coverture light Mod way Ankerstein v clarke t r they may join  in a action of debt on the escape of a person commit by the court of chancery  for nonperformance of a decree to pay money to the husband in a suit institute  by the wife before marriage and revive after Huggins v Durham and wife in  error Str they must join in a action on a agreement to grind defendant corn at  the wife mill Dunstan v Burwell will the dipper at Tunbridge well and their  husband must join in a action for disturb they in the employment confirm to  they by statute weller v baker will they can join in a action for money lend  by the wife with the husband consent king v Basingham Mod way Bidgood v way Bl  Rep nor for a legacy leave to the wife on a express promise to pay and on  count for money have and receive pay and expend and a account state rise v  bowler Henry Bl Salkeld er p