case bedo against Sanderson illegal interest take for a loan although in the  form of a reservation of rend be usurious ante post Noy Bl Rep Cowp dougl will  hawk p c Cowp to Rep in a information for usury it be sufficient to set forth  the corrupt bargain general hawk p c in a information for usurious interest  take under colour of rend it be not necessary to state the value of the house  at the time the corrupt agreement be make information in the exchequer for  that the defendant per way corrupted parts bargain et cheviansiae fac betwixt  the defendant and one Edward hains receive of one John hains administrator of  the say Edward hains betwixt the rd June James sixtyfive pound videlicet for  the use and occupation of a house in Clerkenwell in the county of Middlesex  from midsummer James to Michaelmas James fifteen pound et pro holding back et  detention loosing one thousand pound from the that April for six month then  follow fifty pound where in fact predict messuagium adtunc to be strong  dimittend per annum l et non ultra and therefore he demand three thousand  pound be the Triple of the value of the thousand pound so forbear after  verdict for the plaintiff upon not guilty plead it be move in arrest of  judgement that this information be not good first because he do not show the  certainty what the bargain be but general per way corrupted parts c say non  allocatur for it be say that so be the usual course in the exchequer be ground  upon the receipt and that be to be prove in evidence but it be agree that in  plead to avoid a bind or a assurance it ought to be particular plead and show  for the party be privy to the manner of his contract but the informer be not  privy thereto and therefore it suffice he to show the particular upon the  evidence second because it be not show that the house be not worth above  twenty pound a year at the time of the bargain for peradventure by fire or  tempest it may fall in toto well in part so as at the time of the receipt it  be worth but twenty pound and here adtunc to be strong can be refer to the  time of the bargain for there be no time lie thereof but there be three time  allege videlicet first betwixt the d June James second the occupation of the  house from midsummer to Michaelmas three the forbearance of the money from  that April James for six month follow and then it be say where in fact  messuagium prediction adtunc to be strong c so it be uncertain to which of  those time adtunc refer and if it shall refer to the last as proper adtunc  always refer to the last antecedent as Henry pl dyer bold case be that it  ought to be so expound then this be no offence and it be uncertain to which of  the time it shall refer and so the information be not good for the defendant  ought to be certain and precise charge who be to be fine and imprison croak  throw and not by argument and implicitively and precedent be show that in such  case the usual course be to allege it to be of such a value and no more at the  time of the bargain when the want of the value of the house be the sole  offence and chevisance which be pretend and for that purpose be cite precedent  in the exchequer in Trinity term Elizabeth a see car c and will c croak James  er p roll Harrison v bagshaw in Michaelmas term Elizabeth Farnaby v beth and  in Trinity term James roll and Lovedays case in the new bk of Ent wherefore it  be pray that the defendant may be discharge and after the argument at the bar  by the attorney general and sergeant Chiburn in maintenance of the information  and by Thomas crew and Damport and George croak for the maintenance of the  exception it be adjudge for the plaintiff vide fox case dyer Stradlings case  Plowd and the yearbook Edward pl