case wall vers Fulwood all in c b a argumentative plea be not good Com dig  this be a action of trespass quod September Geo the defendant way arms and  eunuch quer without causan rational ceper percusser fugaver imparcaver eunuch  such imparcat per spatiurn three a day detinuer nor September Geo and all  eunuch quer ceper abduxer the defendant quoad way arms nor tot transgr in nar  pillage mentionat praeter caption percussion fugation imparcation and eunuch  super they September eunuch such imparcat per interval three a day detention  non cul quoad and eunuch comens Self quer caption percussion fugation  imparcation eunuch ill such imparcat per pillage interval three a day in nar  pillage mentionat per the same defen become supposit to say quod ante pillage  time quo c ricardus Fulwood wait seize in fee of Chester close and that for  damagefeasant there the defendant eunuch pillage ceper c the plaintiff reply  that he be rector of Renslinch in the county of Worcester of which rectory a  message and fifty acre of land be parcel that in the parish of Renslinch  quidam campus step forth consisten in part de land that can be plowed in part  de meadow peremptory or urgent call Westfield de quo Chester close in quo c be  parcel that the rector of the say rectory have time out of mind have right of  common in that part of Westfield call the arable part of which Chester close  in quo c be parcel pro omnibus averiis enter agreement nabil in super mess  fifty sharp pillage levan cuban in whithersoever you please year quo compus  pillage cum grano in debt is owed tempore secundum consuetude agriculture  ibidem plant to be a tempore quo tot grand such plant carry away to be until  what time aliquan pars campi pillage cum grano reproduce to be in year quo to  be thrown or cast friscus ad Worcet per tot and ill quod year tertio Geo  pillage Westfield in part peremptory or urgent call pars that can be plowed  ind cum grano plant to be ante pillage time quo c no one grand in eoden campo  remanen to be per quod quer to put down eunuch pillage super mess fifty sharp  land pillage levand cuban in Chester close ad coia svan ibidem act  c the  defendant rejoin quod sex sharp land peremptory or urgent call Pratts Nathan  near Radford bridge are parcel de Westfield year good luck Geo cum grano plant  fuer tempore quo c two carectat viciar eoden year secuddo plant fuer remanen  in pillage sex sharp land duob carectat ill such remanen and de in an unjust  manner not common with others to put down pillage eunuch in Chester close  pillage comens er p to which the plaintiff demurrer and the defendant join in  demurrer and it be insist that the rejoinder be have for that the rejoinder  ought to answer to the replication which prescribe for common in Westfield of  which Chester close in quo c be parcel a tempore quo tot grand carry away to  be until what time aliquan pars campi pillage reproduce if the defendant will  not traverse the prescription but only the time of use his common he shall  comens have deny quod tot grand carry away to be upon which the issue will  have be well join or afterward upon such a inducement as this shall have  traverse without hoc quod tot grand to be carry away for the issue be upon the  affirmative and the negative and one ought to be commensurate to the other but  here the denial of the defendant be not so second the rejoinder of the  defendant be not a direct denial of the matter allege by the plaintiff but by  inference the plaintiff say that all the grain be carry off the ground the  defendant say that pratt Nathan will parcel of the field where two load of  fetch remain this be evidence and by consequence infer that all the grain be  not carry but be not a direct negative to the matter allege by the plaintiff  and a plea which be argumentative be not goodAn argumentative plea shall be  aid by verdict or on a general demurrer all   light a die b Brownl Bulst SC  march Sav a Yelv three if this be a negative to the plaintiff affirmative then  the defendant ought to have conclude to the country for when there be a direct  negative and affirmative there be a full issue and the conclusion ought to be  to the country Yelv Brownl S c b sand sand Mod keb SC raym side keb SC cro car  dyer a salk c fourthly the plaintiff can answer any thing to this rejoinder  for if he say that two load of fetch do not remain upon pratt Nathan tempore  quo c this will be a departure for by his replication he have say that all the  grain be carry out of all the field now that it be carry out of one part only  and if it be find that the two load of fetch be carry this verdict will be  immaterial for there may be grain grow on other part of the field