case viscount say and seal against Stephens ante page a writ of error do not  lie on Richard c for a action of scan mag post Jones cro side vent lie raym  cro James cro Elizabeth ld raym Com dig see the case of Lloyd v skutt dougl  post viscount say and seal have have judgement to recover a writ of error be  bring to remove the record into the exchequer Chamber upon the Elizabeth c  which give a writ of error upon a judgement give in action upon the case debt  detinue covenant account ejectment or trespass first commence there where the  king majesty shall not be a party it be move that the writ of error be not  Allowable because it be give in seven several action there enumerate and be  not Allowable in any other action as in replevin to know facias c and although  it be here term a action upon the case yet it be more than a action upon the  case for it be in a far high degree and find upon the Richard c and be for the  king and party and of that opinion be hide chief justice Jones and Whitlock  that this action be out of the statute for the statute be to be intend in  action upon the case and not in other action nor to this action which be  temptation to sin great man and ground especial upon the statute and the  Elizabeth c be to alter the course of the commonlaw ought not to be extend to  other action than what be mention in the statute and it be say that after the  say statute no writ of error have be bring upon such action and it be  intendable that if a writ of error may have be bring it will have be practice  before these time but the other throw before a post cro Elizabeth Yelv more  cro James croak car er p cion that it be bring by the king and the party be  not much regard for so be action upon the case for the king and the party and  debt for not set out tithe yet it be a common course upon those action to have  writ of error in the exchequer Chamber and it be say that if the lord in  parliament have intend that this shall be examine by a writ of error any where  but only in parliament they peradventure will not have agree unto it but I  doubt thereof and deliver not any opinion for I conceive it more proper to  have it dispute in the exchequer croak car Chamber when the writ of error  shall be return as it have be in other case where a writ of error have be  bring upon a to know facias and be adjudge there that it lie not than for we  to dispute it be a matter of our own judge a