case anger against BROOKHEN queen whether a verdict give for damage and d cost  and judgement to recover his damage aforesaid to and de growth be good SC post  SC vent SC Jones SC ray SC Danv error the verdict be financial loss one  hundred pound and pro misis et custagiis six penny the judgement be that he do  recover financial loss svan pillage ad cent libras et pro increment ten pound  error assign that there be no judgement for the six penny and the court  incline that ad cent libras shall be surplusage and then financial loss svan  predict will be well enough if it have be recupere financial loss svan pillage  ad valentian a the court pen a writ of error will stay proceed in debt on the  judgement even after judgement be sign taswell v stone burr so on the  defendant confess judgement in the second action and undertake not to bring a  writ of error they will stay the execution until the determination of the writ  of error depend gribble v abbot Cowp unless it appear to have be bring mere  for delay entwisle v Sheppherd term Rep carter v Robert term Rep dote c but  the confession of the defendant burr ut above or the oath of the plaintiff  that it be bring mere for delay seem not sufficient Christie v Richardson term  Rep the court however have refuse to stay proceed against the bail pen a writ  of error on the judgement against the principal on the confession of the  principal that the writ of error be bring pure for delay pool v Charnock term  Rep Kempland v Macauley term Rep Evans v Gilbert term Rep notorious facts  shower KB er p ten pound the ad valentian shall be void and the plaintiff  shall recover all in Osborne case it be only financial loss svan without  pillage and so it can not have reference to any certainty if you leave out  those word ad c a note that case of Osborne v Exton b error upon a judgement  in the king bench in Ireland where the jury give ten shilling and six penny  for damage and cost and the judgement enter be quod recupere financial loss  svan per a swearer assess ad valor ten pound and no notice be take of the six  penny nor be that part release and it be hold nought because damage and cost  be all financial loss and both include by that word in the judgement and  judgement be reverse nisi note also the case of web v web c where error be  bring upon a judgement by default in case in the court of common plea and the  error assign here be that the juror upon the writ of inquiry have assess more  damage than be lie in the declaration and the judgement be quod recupere  financial loss svan predict per a swearer predict assess c be shower KB nought  and for this error the judgement be accord reverse but observe that in this  last case the plaintiff may between the verdict and the judgement have release  the surplusage of the damage here mean and such release be enter upon the  record will have render the judgement well enough vide Yelv