a feme sole give a promissory note for pound to I S and afterward marry the  defendant who have a fortune of pound with her part whereof consist of thing  in action some of which he receive in her lifetime and the rest he take as  administrator to her the bill be for the payment of this note upon suggestion  of his have receive a great fortune with her and never have make any  settlement upon her the defendant insist that that part of his wife be fortune  which be equity case abridge er p not reduce into possession by he during the  coverture and which equity case abridge he receive as her administrator be not  near sufficient to pay her debt and that he have already pay more than that  part amount to Talbot c decree a account of what the husband have receive  since his wife be death as administrator to her and that he shall be liable  for so much only but as to any further demand against her he dismiss the bill  hill hear and Stanford can in Eq tempt Talbot as on the one hand the husband  be by law liable to all his wife be debt during the coverture although he do  not get one shilling portion with her and that her debt shall amount to or any  other sum whatsoever so on the other hand it be as certain that if the debt be  not recover during the coverture the husband be no long Chargeable as such let  the fortune he receive with his wife be never so great per Lord Chan his  lordship cite the case of freeman and goodland not Goodham vide Vol Eq can Abr  that Edit p can and my note there and also the case of Powell and bell vide  say book can c where the wife be administratrix of her first husband and it do  not appear what she have in her own right and what as administratrix of her  husband in which case his lordship say the marriage be no gift in law of the  good which she have in auter law and that upon this reason only be find all  the case where a survive husband have be charge with the wife be debt after  her death ibidem will Rep hill SC accord and say the case of the earl of  thomond and the earl of Suffolk will Rep be cite as a case in point where Lord  Chan Parker deny to relieve a bind creditor of the wife dumb sola against the  husband who survive and on the marriage have sufficient personal estate  wherewith to answer her debt ibidem will Rep in a note say that agreeable to  the resolution in the case of the earl of thomond and the earl of Suffolk and  on the authority thereof be the case of hear and Stamford determine in lincoln  inn hall march f how far the baron be Chargeable with the debt OF the feme  contract during the coverture