case moth against from a estate come to a bankrupt after he have obtain his  certificate as heir at law not assignable within the statute of bankrupt lib  Reg b foe b at the roll that Feb by consent George bell brother of mary moth  and Margaret wade the plaintiff upon his marriage with whether from convey a  freehold estate in Middlesex and Berks to himself for life remainder to  whether for life remainder to the child as they shall appoint and for want of  appointment to the first and other son in tail male remainder to daughter  reversion in fee to himself the husband and wife die without make any  appointment leave two child whether and Thomas ambler er p d November Margaret  wade become a bankrupt and in February obtain her certificate and in June both  the child die so that the two plaintiff become coheir to Thomas who survive  his sister and the question be whether Margaret part of the freehold estate  shall not go to the assignee as a possibility accord to the word of Geo which  be very strong master of the bolls this be not that kind of possibility there  must be a mask designate Higden v Williamson wms which be the occasion of the  act it must be a possibility that can be assign or release such as she can  disclose upon her examination decree for the bankrupt it appear from lib Reg  that Ann and Thomas bell the two child both die in infant Thomas have survive  his sister upon his death the freehold estate vest in the plaintiff as state  in the text Thomas be also as survive his sister entitle to considerable  leasehold and other personal estate and upon his death this estate become  distributable between the plaintiff and the defendant from who be the maternal  uncle of the infant the bill be file against from who be survive trustee under  the settlement to have the freehold premise convey and to be let into  possession and against Willatt who together with from have possess himself of  the infant personal estate the assignee of Margaret wade be also defendant the  decree declare that onethird of the personal estate of Thomas bell who survive  his sister Ann and die a infant of tender year be not such a possibility as  vest in the say assignee but belong to the plaintiff Ann wade as one of the  three next of kin of the say infant and as to the freehold estate in question  if any of the party shall assert a claim to such estate or any part thereof at  law it be order the say defendant from and Willatt or such of they as have the  deed and write relate to such estate in their custody do produce the same at  the instance of the party assert such claim it will appear from the above  extract from l r that the court do not in fact determine the question as to  the real estate but leave the party to try the question at law the only  question determine be as to the personal estate which come to Margaret wade  after her certificate as one of the next of kin of the infant Thomas in  Carleton v Leighton mere it be hold that a estate which descend after the  bargain and sale to the commissioner and before certificate do not vest in the  assignee except by a subsequent assignment but the creditor be entitle to a  legacy leave to the bankrupt after the sign but before allowance of his  certificate tudway v bourn ken S c burr p so where upon sign the certificate  by the creditor a person make bankrupt a present of a lottery ticket and the  same day in the afternoon the certificate be allow by the great seal the  lottery ticket have come up a prize in the morning be hold to belong to the  creditor ken