a bill of exchange be draw upon the plaintiff at Leghorn which he accept but  by the law there if a bill be accept and the drawer fail and the acceptor have  not sufficient effect of the drawer in his hand at the time of acceptance the  acceptance equity case abridge become void and this happen to be the plaintiff  case in order to discharge himself from this acceptance he institute a suit at  Leghorn and his acceptance be thereupon vacate by a sentence in that court  afterward the plaintiff return to England and be sue here at law upon this  bill and thereupon he exhibit his bill in this court for a injunction and  relief king Lord chancellor be clear of opinion that this Cause be to be  determine accord to the local law of the place where the bill be negotiate and  the plaintiff acceptance of the bill have be vacate and declare void by a  competent jurisdiction he think that sentence be conclusive and bind the court  of chancery here and to this purpose he instance the case of one Hutchinson in  of car and be mention in show where Hutchinson have kill a person in Spain be  there prosecute try and acquit of the murder and afterward return to  England he be indict again for the same murder here to which indictment he  plead his acquittal in Spain in bar and the plea be allow to be a good bar to  any proceed here and upon the attorney general be insist that the plaintiff  may have take advantage of this upon a trial at law and therefore not  relievable in a court of equity the chancellor declare that if he be to try  the Cause at law he will allow the plaintiff the benefit of this matter upon  the trial but as other judge may be of a different opinion he will not put the  plaintiff upon the difficulty and hazard of a trial and he say he remember a  case which come before he in the Lord mayor court when he be recorder of the  city of London where a mariner sue in the admiralty court for his wage and  there be a sentence against he there he afterward bring his action in the  mayor court for the same wage and his lordship as recorder be doubtful whether  he shall allow the defendant to give the sentence in the admiralty court in  evidence upon non assumpsit ask the opinion of chief justice holt who say that  whatever defeat the promise may be give in evidence on non assumpsit and that  the sentence in the admiralty court will be good evidence and in this case a  perpetual injunction be grant to enjoin the defendant from sue upon this bill  in canc Nov burrow and Jemino ms Rep SC dick e Sel can in Ch stram mosel in a  injunction the word pro diminution placiti c be intend of a issuable plea and  the word judgment to go into be intend of a final judgement therefore if the  defendant be a executor and plead plene to manage and the plaintiff at law  enter judgement de good testator cum to fall upon he may proceed to a to know  facias to inquire of asset and enter judgement thereupon for the meaning of  the injunction be that the defendant may proceed so far as that nothing shall  remain but to take out execution after the injunction be dissolve mich vide  will Rep plaintiff obtain a injunction on defendant pray time to answer but  before the injunction serve defendant answer come in and defendant obtain a  verdict at law and sue out a to know facias on the judgement when asset to  fall upon after the verdict plaintiff serve the injunction and on a motion to  discharge it absolute king c say it be a abuse of the process of the court to  keep it in a man pocket thus I must discharge this injunction and let  plaintiff move for a injunction on the merit mich term Geo anon ms note Kel pl  SC S p