case LX h devise   light b Plowd scholasticas case b h h Br devise a devise  land to b and to the heir male of his body b have issue a daughter who have  issue a son the daughter die in the life of b afterward a die and afterward b  die this son shall take by this devise for although he be not the son but the  grandson of b be be the heir male of b and I so understand the principal case  that if the daughter have survive b and a have die in the life of the daughter  the son of the daughter in this case shall not take for he be not heir male to  b this son can be heir to b in his mother lifetime for if so the fee will be  in abeiance during the life of the mother which the law will not suffer will  latissiman interpretation to have to withhold the law be otherwise upon a gift  in tail the male in this case ought to convey by male although the surname of  the family shall be alter it be not material in law in a appeal bring by the  heir male of the murder of his ancestor there be a son of a daughter the  daughter die in the lifetime of her father and the father afterward be kill  this son of the daughter shall have a appeal e h great Charta ch Stamford the  law noth not regard surname for ancient all surname be the Christian name of  the father as the jews Welsh and Irish use or name of a trade or office or  some notable mark upon the body the king of England before the conquest and  after the conquest till the time of h have no surname neither have any of the  king of Christendom the consideration of a surname will not raise a use as be  resolve in the case of sir Christopher Hatton he have a sister son call  Newport and in consideration of his change his name to Hatton be covenant by  deed to raise a use to he this consideration be adjudge not sufficient to  raise a use a use be well raise upon consideration of blood but the  consideration of blood will not create a debt though a deed will without  mention any consideration a assumpsit to pay a his Jenkins cousin be void if  there be do other consideration the reason of the difference be the land go to  the blood but so do not the debt a have issue a son and daughter and have a  brother a s surname be give a devise that if his son shall die without issue  his land shall go to the right heir male of his name and posterity for ever  the soil die without issue a die his daughter shall have the land for if the  brother shall take he shall take as a purchaser and if so he ought to be heir  and male but he be not heir for the daughter be heir and this limitation be a  due form of inheritance which the law will not suffer where a remainder be  limit to the right heir of I S and J S afterward be attaint his heir shall not  take his blood be corrupt and so his issue be not his heir in the case of  felony where under the statute Westminster de gift land be give to a and the  heir male of his body and he commit murder or any felony his heir shall have  the land and his blood be not corrupt it be corrupt in case of treason where  the father have land and be attaint of treason by force of the statute of the  h for forfeiture of treason where the grandfather have a estate tail the  father be attaint of treason and the grandfather and son survive he the son  shall have the land for the corruption of blood upon this statute be only  where the traitor have a estate tail in the land but where the grandfather  have the land and the father who be attaint have nothing and the father die in  the life of the grandfather nothing be forfeit andwhere there be no forfeiture  Westminster preserve the blood from corruption Lord lumley case adjudge