case SHOYLE against tailor Michaelmas term James roll a brewer or spurrier be  liable to a who tam information for exercise those trade contrary to Elizabeth  c     cro car roll Rep Bulst palm Com dig Bac ab hawk p c burr the Elizabeth c  which enact that offence against Elizabeth c shall be only inquire of within  the county do not exclude the jurisdiction of the king bench and in all case  who tam a information may be in the exchequer for the whole penalty to the use  of the king information in the exchequer on the Elizabeth c by Shoyle for the  king and croak James er p himself for that the defendant at saint clement near  temple bar London on the first of December James et continue postea usque  November James which be until the day of the information for the space of  eleven month and more exercise and occupy the art and occupation of a brewer  be a occupation use within the realm January Eliz where in fact he do not  exercise the say trade the January Elizabeth nor be ever bring up for seven  year as a apprentice in the say art contra form to cause to stand the  defendant plead not guilty and it be find against he and after verdict move in  arrest of judgement first that the art of a brewer be not such a trade the use  whereof be prohibit by the statute say non allocatur for by the express word  of the statute it be reckon as a trade or occupation and the word in the  statute whereupon this information be find refer to the trade aforesaid second  that by the statute of Elizabeth c it be enact that offence against the  statute of Elizabeth c shall be inquire of only in the session of peace assize  or leet within the county where the offence be commit et non alibi extra  comitat so as this information upon this statute in this court be not  maintainable croak throw and of this point the baron be in doubt but it be  afterward resolve upon consideration of the statute that the information well  lie for the intent of the statute be that for such offence man shall not be  draw out of the county where the offence be commit and although the statute  mention that the suit shall be for they in such court there name yet it be not  in the negative and not in any other court but not in any other county and  this be a suit for the king and in this court proper for he this information  be well maintainable and so it be adjudge and a precedent be show easter term  James roll in the king bench between ken v drake a for use the art of a  spurrier within the say parish of saint clement against the say statute and it  be adjudge that it well lie but it be say that there be not any question in  that case because the offence be in Middlesex and the king bench sit in  Middlesex they have the power of the session intend within the statute But the  court hold it to be all one wherefore it be adjudge accord note the principal  case be afterward affirm in a writ of error this be the first case wherein sir  Laurence Tanfield be before justice of the king bench and the same day make  chief baron of the exchequer be the last day of the term speak and adjudge by  the opinion of all the court see James c and and car c