case haw against cony Trinity term Elizabeth roll what word in a will shall  amount to a authority SC I Leon skin vern p wms burr Cowp bro Cas Ch trespass  for break his close in Thurkell upon not guilty plead the jury find a special  verdict John smith have issue Thomas smith and Rohert Snib Thomas smith be  seize of a house and seven acre of land in Thurkell for life reversion in fee  to Rohert his brother the say Rohert be seize in possession of forty acre of  land in possession in Norton in the same county Rohert make his will and  devise all his free and copyhold land to his executor for performance of his  will and the will of I smith his father in which be diverse legacy give to  have and to hold to they and every of they and that they shall take the profit  of it for ten year to the use of his will and that afterward his executor or  one of they shall sell the land and distribute the money in performance of the  say will and die Thomas the brother be tenant for life die within half a year  after he the executor enter into the land in Norton but not in Thurkell and  occupy they for ten year and after enter into the land in Thurkell and sell  all the land in Thurkell and Norton whereupon the heir of Rohert the devisor  enter into the land in Thurkell the question be if his entr be lawful Cooper  argue for the defendant that by the word and intention of the will they have  no authority to sell the land in reversion for the word that they shall take  the profit for ten year show his intent only for the land in possession of  which prof it may be take coke contra the profit shall he intend such profit  as he may take of a reversion and be like the case Henry pl a devise be of all  his tenement in shades of dead nest to step out the reversion shall pass and  cite the case Edward pl for the exposition of word in the king grant gawdy  justice the reversion be not devise for no profit of it but all the other  justice cantra for the intent of the devise be to perform the two will and to  pay debt c and perhaps the land in possession be not suflicient Wray chief  justice say the word all persuade he much that his intent be so and the word  to have and to hold and the word to take the croak Elizabeth profit be of one  sense for he can hold but by take the profit and here be two will to he  perform and therefore the devise shall he take in the most liberal manner for  the a it be move again and the judgement be affirm post croak Elizabeth er p  performance of they but if it have been find that the land in possession be  sufficient to perform they this may peradventure have alter the case