case cromwell against GRUMSDALE if what be the intent of the party can be  understand the bind be good S c Mod S c salk S c ld ray S c comb S c salk S c  holt debt against the defendant as administrator of Roger urlin for forty  pound for that the say Roger on the ten of July per scribe suum obligatorium  pron  interrog  act of giving be the same die et year say in addition to  cognovit see tender et really to bind up prfat Georg in prd forty scales per  hc word quadrant balance Payable on request the defendant plead non be factum  predict richardi urlin the jury find quod indeed r urlin intest prd Grumsdale  do seal and deliver a certain write in form of a obligation in hc word by  which he oblige himself to the say George Cromwell per mid twenty in quadrant  lib bon et of coin England ad how indeed loosing be oblige himself his  executor administrator and assign really per prsentes seal adorned with small  figures that primo die Julii year royal power king carol Secund condition for  the payment of twenty pound twelve shilling on the twentyfifth of December  next ensue the date thereof c c holt chief justice who deliver the opinion of  the court say that the bind be as silly and inartificial as can be yet the  intention of the party be apparent the plaintiff must have judgement as for  the quadrant lib if there have be nothing further to explain it we shall have  make nothing of it but the word quadrant here be something of four and it  appear by the condition to be for the payment of twenty pound we can  understand it to be mean of any modern report other sum than forty pound and  if the meaning do sufficient appear we ought to construe bind and agreement  not accord to the strict word but accord to the intention of the party  sessanta be as unintelligible as this and so be quantoginta a we have search  the roll of the case of Dodson v key b and find it exact the same as report in  Yelv as to the per mid twenty that be insensible and therefore can hurt then  as to the pron  interrog  that in the declaration there be no such date as  year royal power it be a void date and the plaintiff may allege the deed to be  make when he will and though by the profert hic in cur he have confine himself  yet the pron  interrog  act of giving shall be understand of the delivery and  not the date pron  interrog  act of giving shall be the give of which be c if  it have be gerent date it may have be otherwise but here it be good enough  therefore judgement be give for the plaintiff