case Wentworth versus DEVERGINY Eq Abr c S c a make a voluntary settlement on  b who after agree to deliver it up without consideration this agreement shall  bind in equity for a voluntary settlement may be surrender voluntary the late  Lord Strafford have entertain the defendant first as his servant and afterward  have take a great affection to he as his friend and companion and have often  promise to make he a considerable fortune do settle a estate in England on he  of about pound per and but my Lord afterward have a mind to have that estate  back again the defendant reconvey it to he and deliver back the deed Lord  still continue his former kindness to he and his promise of make he a fortune  accord my Lord do settle a estate he have in Sligo in Ireland after his own  death on the defendant and the heir of his body and this estate be about pound  per and afterward my Lord have a mind to have this estate again which the  defendant agree and comply with my Lord still continue his promise of make his  fortune and grant he rentcharge of pound out of this Sligo estate but by the  negligence of my Lord or his agent to demand it the defendant never deliver up  the conveyance of the Sligo estate nor make any conveyance of it precedent in  chancery er p afterward my Lord pay the defendant pound to purchase off a  moiety of this annuity of pound per and and the defendant thereupon release  pound per and but afterward my Lord have a mind to have that pound per and  release also and speak to the defendant about it who often both by word of  mouth and by letter promise to release it and a release be bring and tender to  he to be execute but there have happen some difference between my Lord and he  he precedent in chancery refuse to execute it whereof my Lord be inform he  come into his chamber for he live in my lord house and expostulate sharp with  he and thereupon he execute the release and my Lord and he part and never live  together afterward nor see one another except once my Lord die have make his  will and devise all his real and personal estate after debt and legacy pay to  the plaintiff who bring this bill to have a reconveyance of the Sligo estate  and the settlement deliver up defendant insist that he ought not to reconvey  at least not unless the pound per and be make good to he which he have release  by threat and compulsion as he pretend or at best that release be voluntary  and without consideration and therefore ought not to be aid in a court of  equity beside that he be in the nature of a purchaser be to part with his  interest in the land for the rentcharge my Lord keeper say that a voluntary  settlement may be surrender without consideration and that such surrender may  be aid by a court of equity and decree the conveyance of the Sligo estate to  be deliver up and the defendant to reconvey it precedent in chancery de  boundary paschae in curian porter