ccccxiii lacy and fisher case trial exposition of stat h cap in a replevin the  take be suppose in S which land be hold of the manor of esthall the defendant  make conusans as bailiff of the lord of the manor aforesaid and issue be take  upon the tenure and it be try by a jury out of the visne of esthall only  Tanfield the trialis good for the issue ought not to have be try by both  visnes S and esthall for two thing be in issue if it be hold or not if it be  hold of the manor of esthall for which cause the visne ought to be from both  place and the opinion of the court be that for the manner of it it be not good  as if a issue be join upon common for cause of vicinage it shall be try by  both town see h by Littleton and Danby and the case in e be cite in a per who  the condition of a slave the manor be in one county and the land hold in  another county the tenant plead that he do not hold of the conusor and that he  be try by a jury of the county where the land be see h gawdy deny the book  cite of e to be law and the reason wherefore the visne shall come from both  place be because it be most likely that both the visnes may better know the  truth of the matter than the one only another exception be take because the  conusans as it seem be make accord to the statute of h and yet the party do  not pursue the say statute through the whole conusans for by the statute in  avowry or conusans the party needs not to name any person certain to be tenant  to the land c nor to make avowry or conusans upon any person certain and now  in this conusans he have not make conusance upon any person certain but yet he  have name a person certain to be tenant c and in as much as this conusans be  not make either accord to the commonlaw or accord to the statute it can be  good but that exception be disallow by the court for if the statute remedy two  thing it remedy one and the conusance make in form as above be well enough by  the opinion of the whole court trin Elizabeth in the king bench