case christopher baker against Searle Hilary term Elizabeth roll a verdict in  ejectment find a lease by tenant in tail must also find the commencement of  the estate and the life of the tenant ante post   light roll ab Com dig Cowp  post Ant cro James Lut Ejectionefirmce upon not guilty plead a special verdict  be find that Edward earl of Hedford be seize in tail of the rectory of d et  Decimus ind c which be the tithe in question and let it to John Willet and his  assign for the life of Christopher baker Joan baker his feme and Christopher  Willet and that the say John Willet demise the say rectory and tithe to one  Danbury and his heir to the use of Christopher baker the plaintiff for  eightynine year if any of the cesti and vies should so long live v irtutis  pron  interrog  this mission idem querensfuit possessionatus until the  defendant enter c croak Elizabeth and it be hereupon move for the  defendant First that the verdict be not good for the plaintiff because he do  not show the beginning of the estate tail which be the particular estate and  that the court hold to he a apparent fault also he do not aver the life of the  tenant in tail so the lease of the tithe which consist in grant be determine  by his death as also for that the use be not limit to b but for year only so  the remainder of the use be in Danbury and the life of Danbury be not aver and  if he he dead Christopher baker the plaintiff be in as a occupant and then no  ejectionefirmcr lie in the case but the court hold clear that there be do any  use limit but for the year because the residue of the estate be in Willet the  grantor and not in Danbury and it be all one as to this purpose with a feoff  to the use of one for life the use for the residue of the estate be in the  feoff and clear there can be any occupancy because it be grant to Danbury and  his heir which exclude the occupancy another exception be take by Walmsley for  that he say v irtule citizens dismissionis where he come in by the limitation  of a use so it ought to have be Elizabeth irtute to cause to stand c and this  be hold to be a apparent fault in substance and not in form wherefore it be  ddjudged for the defendant croak Elizabeth er p