case hide versus parrot of the eighth month Eq can ab pl S c a devise  household good to his wife for life and afterward to his son this be a good  devise over and the same as if the devise have be only of the use of the good  to the wife for life the plaintiff hide father devise the good in his house at  hoddesden in these word I give and bequeathe unto my wife all my household  good that be in my dwell Vernon chancery case er p house at hoddesden in the  parish of MuchAmwell during her natural life and after her decease I give and  bequeathe my say household good unto my son Joseph for ever the question be  whether the devise over of these personal chattel as the will be word be good  or not it be insist by the defendant counsel that the devise over be void and  rely on the difference take in the book where the thing itself be devise as in  this case the good be devise the devise over be void but where only the use of  they be devise to one for life it be otherwise and for that purpose cite the  case h brook abridgment title devise Plowdens commentary b Owen report and  marsh report where a prohibition be grant out of the court of common plea to  the court of the march of Wales for proceed for the devise over of a personal  chattel Vernon chancery case for the plaintiff it be answer that all these  authority cite be build upon the case h but of latter time it have be  otherwise resolve upon great debate and instance in the case of Lord Ferrars  heart and say and Vachell and Vachell can in Ch c and that in the present case  the same arise upon a will a construction as far as the law will admit be to  be make that the intention of the testator may take place and therefore if a  man possess of a term for year grant the term to one for life the remainder  over the remainder over be void but in the case of a will or of a assignment  by way of trust there the remainder over be good the Lord keeper hold that the  devise over be good for as to the personal chattel the civil and canon law be  to be consider and there the rule be where personal chattel be devise for a  limit time it shall be intend the use of they only and not the devise of the  thing itself and therefore allow the remainder over to be good vide p wms p S  c and particular the case cite at length in the note there Clarges v duke of  Albemarle ante p Gibbs v Barnardiston pray Ch pale yellow Eq Rep S p Vernon  chancery case de term S HILLARII in curian porter