case hall against walland easter term James roll Leicester the will allege in  the declaration shall be intend to be in the county name in the margin if no  other county be mention ante hob ld raym will stram Bl Rep on a promise to pay  in consideration of procure lessor to grant licence to lessee to assign  neither the term unexpired or the restraint of alienation need be show  assumpsit for money expend need not show the day and place where post a  promise to pay so much quantum to deserve with a averment quod to deserve so  much be well allege error of a judgement in the common plea in a assumpsit  where the plaintiff declare whereas William Mabbs be possess of such land in  Melton Mowbrey for a term of year of the demise of John uvoodward and whereas  there be communication betwixt the say William Mabbs and the defendant for his  estate and interest the defendant that April James at Melton Mowbrey aforesaid  in consideration the plaintiff will procure the say John uvoodward to licence  the say William Mabbs to assign his lease and interest to the say John walland  promise he will pay all his charge and as much as he deserve for obtain  thereof not exceed fortyfour shilling and allege in fact that he afterward  videlicet that June at Melton Mowbrey aforesaid procure the say John uvoodward  to grant this licence and that he pay to he therefore twenty shilling and the  engross thereof cost forty croak throw shilling and deserve for his pain ten  shilling and that the defendant although require have not pay c the defendant  hereupon demurrer and adjudge for the plaintiff and error bring the first  error assign be because it be not show in what county Melton Mowbrey be so it  do not appear where the land lie nor where the promise be make say non  allocatur for Leicester be in the margin it be always intend to be the county  where the land lie none other be mention vide Plowd Henry pl a second error  assign be because he show not what term be to come nor that he be tie with any  condition to restrain he from alienation say non allocatur for non refert how  many year be to come nor whether there be any such condition for if the one  will not buy nor the other sell without licence his procure a licence be a  sufficient cause c wherefore the declaration be sufficient three because he do  not allege the day nor place where he expend these sum say non allocatur for  it be but a conveyance to the action and not traversable fourthly that he  allege the promise to be to pay so much quantum to deserve and aver that he  deserve twenty shilling which be a uncertain and void promise for it can  appear what he deserve and then entire damage be give it be ill for this cause  and the judgement erroneous for all say non allocatur for such promise to pay  so much quantum to deserve be certain enough and he shall make the demand what  he croak James er p deserve and if he demand too much the jury shall abridge  it accord to their discretion in proof thereof two precedent be show the one I  have v Chester a where a tailor bring such a action and allege a promise to  pay so much quantum to deserve for the make of such garment and recover the  other shepherd v Edward b where a physician bring such a action upon a promise  to pay so much quantum to deserve for such a cure and aver that he cure he and  deserve one hundred pound and of that opinion be all the court here and  therefore the judgement be affirm