case STYANT versus staker Jan Eq can ab pl S c the Lord enfranchise a copyhold  with all common thereto belong though the common be extinct at law yet it  subsist in equity Cr Yelv more Brownl the Lord of the manor enfranchise a  copyhold with all commons thereto belong or appertain and afterward buy in all  the other copyhold and then dispute the right of common with the copyholder he  have enfranchise and at law recover against Vernon chancery case er p the  plaintiff because the prescription of common to the copyhold be destroy by the  enfranchisement and the grant of the copyhold with all common thereunto belong  and appertain give no right of common because when enfranchise no common in  point of law belong or appertain thereunto copyholder have use to have common  the lord by deed grant and confirm to he in fee and adjudge the common be go  Dorson v hunter Nov per cur decree the plaintiff shall hold and enjoy against  the defendant the same right of common as belong to the copyhold and cost  against the defendant it appear in this case that the copyhold be enfranchise  by the defendant greatgrandfather so far back as about the that or saint James  saint and that soon after videlicet in the saint James John page son of Henry  page who have purchase the premise in question of the lord file a bill in this  court against the defendant say greatgrandfather on which the say John page  obtain a decree that he his heir and assign owner of the say premise shall  from thenceforth have hold and enjoy such commons in the say premise as he or  his say father have at the time of the say purchase and it further appear that  the say defendant bring a action of trespass easter term car d against the  plaintiff father in respect of the say right of common wherein the plaintiff  father obtain a verdict and enjoy the common till his death that the defendant  afterward Trin term d James d bring the action allude to in the print report  against the plaintiff to which the plaintiff plead his right c and also that  the say defendant the plaintiff at law take advantage of a defect in the  aforesaid deed of purchase to the say Henry page pretend that the same be not  sufficient to pass the say commons to this plea the defendant the plaintiff at  law demurrer and obtain judgement on the demurrer in king b and the bill be to  stay proceed on the say judgement and the decree be that upon read the ancient  decree and the postea in the saint action c this court do think fit and so  order and decree that the plaintiff John Styant his heir and assign owner of  the aforesaid premise shall from henceforth have hold and enjoy the say common  of pasture in the say premise and estovers c without the let or interruption  of the say defendant c accord to the say ancient decree and the postea or  verdict before mention and inasmuch as the say defendant have go to law  against equity and recover a judgement at law against the say plaintiff as  aforesaid the injunction be make perpetual and the defendant order to pay the  cost Reg lib b fol dancer v Evett ante Vol and in what case common be destroy  and in what not by enfranchisement crowder v Oldfield salk raym SC et vide  Watkins on copyhold