coke Report47b wait S case hill Elizabeth in the king bench all principal and  accessary before the murder and all accessary after and before the writ  purchase against who the plaintiff will bring appeal ought to be name in one  writ and not in diverse when the writ be abate the appellant be not entitle to  have damage by stat W cap S a jenk cent the wife of William b wait gentle  bring a appeal a of murder of her husband against diverse and afterward she  bring another appeal against other and in all she have bring seven several  appeal of the say murder against several person as principal and it be resolve  by Popham CJ et totan curian that all the say appeal but the first ought to  abate for without any difficulty all principal and accessary before the murder  and also all accessary after and before the writ purchase against who the  plaintiff will bring appeal ought to be name in one writ and not in diverse c  h the wife of Thomas goter bring a appeal of death against Thomas Walton and  two other Walton only appear and the other make default the plaintiff declare  against all three that be to say two as principal and against the other as  accessary f hale pl cor Stamf cor a Doct pl Inst ante a g ante b Inst islet  cro e dyer pl Stamf a h Jones a ante b Jones b Inst burr a abolish Geo c c  jenk gentleman pl h b a Fitzherbert cor Br appeal kelw pl Stamf cor b coke  report a er p Walton plead that at another time the say woman make a appeal of  the same death before certain justice of gaol delivery in the county of n  against one man as principal of the same death who at her suit before the say  justice be attaint and hang and demand judgement of the writ and plead over to  the felony and it be say by the plaintiff counsel that her writ ought not to  abate because in her appeal before the say justice of gaol delivery she can  not charge any nor can the justice of gaoldelivery make deliverance of any who  then be not in prison in the gaol before they and that Walton and the other  now defendant then be at liberty and therefore it be impossible to join they  in the say appeal before the say justice of gaol delivery and so no default in  the plaintiff but it be adjudge that the writ shall abate and in the same case  three point be resolve that the plaintiff ought to have make her appeal  against all and afterward to have remove it by writ before we in this place  that the wife shall not have d two appeal of death in this place but ought to  join all who she will charge in one and the same writ for if one bring a  appeal of death against diverse and all but one make default yet the plaintiff  ought to declare against all and by the same reason that he shall be drive to  e declare against all he ought to bring his appeal against all that in that  case the defendant shall not have f damage by the statute of W cap because  extra grammatical case to cause to stand because the writ abate vide e a g a  woman bring a appeal of the death of her husband against the principal doer  and the principal coke Report48a assistant and doer and sue another appeal  against the receiver and the book say that the two appeal be maintainable  notwithstanding that the statute give that all shall be in one writ which be  the word of the book in which the statute intend be the statute of great  Charta cap by which it be enact that a nullus to take in hand near appellum  thigh de death of one another how man Himself and because the statute say  appellum in the singular number it be collect that all ought to be name in one  writ which book if it can be maintain for law ought to be intend of accessary  after the first appeal bring which can not be name in the first appeal ride b  ass pl to the same effect