atkins case Haughton versus Harrison June t h give pound by his will to be pay  to his grandson t p if he live to be and in case he die before then to the  other child or child of his daughter m p equal arrive to such a age t p die  before and no child of m p be bear or live at the testator death the  grandchild bear after the death of t h be entitle to the pound for not be in  be in his lifetime he must have have in his view the future child of his  daughter a question arise upon the will of Thomas Haughton date the that of  October he give a legacy of pound to be pay to his grandson Thomas price the  son of mary price if he live to be twentyone and in case he shall die before  then to the other child or child of his daughter equal arrive to such age and  after some small legacy give all the rest and residue of his personal estate  to the plaintiff and die the that of October and since his death Thomas price  his grandson die under the age of twentyone year and there be no child or  child of mary price bear or live at the testator death the plaintiff insist  the five hundred pound ought not to be raise but sink into the residuum of the  testator estate for the plaintiff benefit atkins er p it be insist likewise by  the counsel for the plaintiff the heir at law and only son of the testator  that the latter legacy to the child or child of mrs price be equal contingent  with the legacy to Thomas price and must wait till they arrive at their age of  twentyone and therefore do not carry any interest in the mean time the counsel  for the defendant mary price and Pindock price the brother and sister of  Thomas price insist that the testator in case of Thomas price death before  give the five hundred pound to the other child or child of his daughter equal  arrive to such age and that mary price and Pindock price be entitle thereto  though not bear till after the testator death and that the word if Thomas  price live to be twentyone must be take in the same sense as the word so soon  as he attain his age of will have be and therefore not contingent as to the  payment and that as it be one entire sentence the latter part by relation will  equal carry interest to the other child or child of mrs price as to Thomas  price Lord chancellor it be plain the grandchild bear after the testator death  be entitle for as they be not in be in his lifetime the testator must have  have in his view future child of his daughter Heathe v Heathe ante note but I  be of opinion they be not entitle to interest though I will help they if I  possible can atkins if this legacy have be leave upon no condition but to be  pay to Thomas price at his age of twentyone and not give over then it will  have be a legacy vest and transmissible but still no interest can have be  demand unless it be in the case of a child who have no other maintenance or  provision for a parent be bind by nature to support a child but this have not  be carry so far as the case of grandchild see heath v very post vol note but  here it be still strong for this be not a vest legacy for in case Thomas die  before twentyone it be give over the word equal arrive at the age of twentyone  must be construe agreeable to the other word and therefore it will still  remain a doubt whether any thing vest till twentyone but I shall do determine  this now and will only direct the five hundred pound to be put out to interest  heath v very post vol note and to be pay in the mean time to the plaintiff and  if the child or child of mrs price arrive at their age of twentyone then the  principal sum of five hundred pound to be pay to they and interest from the  time it become Payable