case squire against GREVELL a award that all suit shall cease be final S c  holt S c ld ray S c salk error of a judgement in the court of common plea in  debt upon a bind for performance of a award after no award plead the plaintiff  set forth a award on such a day recite several suit depend between the party  in the common plea and a submission of all matter pen the arbitrator award  first that all suit between the party shall cease second that the defendant  shall pay to the modern plaintiff ten pound in full of all demand and also  give he a release from the beginning of the world to the time of the award  make three that upon receipt of the ten pound the plaintiff shall make a  release to the defendant from the beginning of the world to the time of the  award Parker take three exception to this award first it be not final for it  be only that all suit now depend shall cease that be to say shall not go on  which be no more than that the party shall be nonsuit which be not final and  therefore not good it be true no new suit can be bring while these pen because  these may be plead in abatement nor can these be prosecute because of the  award but if either of the party die new suit may be prosecute for the say  cause notwithstanding this award second the award a general release will  indeed make it a good award if it be conclusive but it be leave in the  plaintiff election whether he make any or not for the release be order to be  make upon receipt of the ten pound and it be not award that he shall receive  it and if he refuse he be not bind to release three the release be order to be  until the time of the award but be confess he do not much insist upon that the  authority be against he for a double reason first that no cause of action  shall be intend to have arise between the time of the submission and the award  if it be not show second that a release to the time of the submission be a  good release in pursuance of the award and the latter he say he take to be the  better reason for a man may have a cause of action modern er p accrue to he  between the submission and the award and not know of it and it will be hard to  put he under a necessity of release it and the reason why a release to time of  submission be hold good be not because it shall be intend to be the meaning of  the arbitrator that it shall be so but it be rather a control of their meaning  as far as it be void by construction of law Pengelly contra the award that all  suit shall cease be that they shall for ever cease and it extinguish the duty  for if the word have be that all action shall cease the duty have be go for if  the remedy be go the right be go and the word suit be of a large extent and  sense than action for by release of suit one may bar himself of execution  which he can do by release of action roll Abr pl a such award extinguish the  duty see the case of strangford v green easter term car and ball v Hescott  will b a award be that one of the party shall pay to the other so much money  on such a day and that all suit shall cease till failure of payment and it be  hold good lev c beside this sum be award in full of all demand and the  submission be with a ita quod a award be make of the premise it be in itself  final Allen roll Abr pl side lev hob style cro Elizabeth d modern holt chief  justice as to the release you say that it be put upon the party own act in  receive or refuse the money to release or not but it have be hold in the case  of London v craven in the Iatter end of style style a that where a thing be  agree to be do upon payment and receipt a tender of the payment and refusal  entitle the party to it as much as a actual payment and the authority have be  so ever since quaere   dyer Lut lev Ent sand then as to the next point that  all suit pen between the party shall cease the question be whether this go to  the cause of action if a man release his action and have no other remedy for  his right but a action do not that discharge the right of the thing now here  be a action depend if a man release that action he thereby release the right  of action and by the same reason determine the suit determine the right of the  thing because there be no remedy but by suit then this award be final if in  trespass the plaintiff after the last continuance release the action the right  be go and if a release will do it why not a award indeed if the party have two  remedy one by action and another by entry and he release the action he may  notwithstanding enter and as for the release to the time of the award make it  shall not be understand that there be any cause of action mean if it be not  show and if there be the party may show it and say that he tender a release to  the time of the submission Powell justice I think all the three point be final  or if but one of they be so the award will be good for so much if that do not  depend upon another branch of the award which be ill and if there be any suit  pen the award that they shall cease be that they shall be at a end for ever  and the word now depend be only to show what sort of action they make their  award of and the ten pound be award to be pay in full of all demand that shall  be intend in full of all demand to the time of submission and not to the time  of payment see kid on award b and if money be award to be pay and that the  other upon receipt shall make release that I take to be a award to receive and  for this he quote a case in the common plea in his time and roll ab pl holt  chief justice here the very award a sum of money be a bar of action for by the  award of money to he a duty thereby arise and vest in he which be a good bar  wherever accord with satisfaction be a good plea but ancient it be hold that  if the thing award be not money but the do of some collateral act the party to  who it be award be without remedy and therefore such award will modern er p be  void but the contrary have be hold since for if two man submit to the award of  a three person they two do also thereby promise express to abide by his  determination kid on award c for agree to refer be a promise in itself b t her  a sum of money be order to be pay it be immediate a duty and if there be no  more than a award to pay a sum of modern money in satisfaction of all demand  it will be final and by the whole court the judgement be affirm