chancery report crisp contra Bluck car foe bind and judgement after upon it  and the principal and interest far surmount the penalty when judgement be  enter how payment of money shall be apply in such case this case come to be  hear upon a bill of review and a appeal from a decree make by the Lord  chancellor Shaftsbury the plaintiff original bill be to be relieve against a  bind of pound penalty for payment of pound and interest enter into by the  plaintiff father the testator and other to William Bluck the young in the  defendant commence suit on the say bind in and have judgement thereupon  against the plaintiff father only and the principal and interest due on the  say bind far surmount the penalty when judgement be obtain and the defendant  be twenty year keep out of his money but have receive several sum in part  since the action at low bring it be decree that whatever money be receive  before the judgement actual enter shall be take in discharge of the interest  of the say pound original debt and that the defendant shall be satisfy after  the judgement enter the whole money thereupon recover with damage from the  time the judgement be actual enter deduct what he have receive since the  actual entry of the chancery report judgement and allow his cost at law and  moderate cost in this court and it be find that the judgement be not actual  enter till the vacation after Michaelmas term and so only pound pay in  November be account interest of the original debt and not towards the money  recover by the judgement and the account be so settle and decree and the money  pay accord yet for reversal of the say decree the now plaintiff for error  assign that the same tend to the invalidate of the course of the court of king  bench it be by the decree admit that the say judgement be enter in the  vacation after Michaelmas term and not before whereas it be evident by the  record of the king bench the say judgement be enter on record in Michaelmas  term and by construction of law be suppose and presume to be record the first  day of that term against which record no evidence or averment ought to be  admit and all money pay after the first day of that term ought in equity to be  apply towards satisfaction of the judgement and so the pound pay in November  in part of a debt in question ought not to go to satisfy the interest but in  part to discharge the principal chancery report the Lord chancellor Shaftsbury  be of opinion that no notice can be take of any actual entry of any judgement  at law but that every judgement whensoever enter if before the Essoinbay of  the subsequent term ought to be account a judgement of the first day of the  term before and allow and hold the say error to be good and decree the pound  pay in Nov shall go and be apply as part of satisfaction of the pound and  damage due on the judgement and what other money be pay by any other of the  obligors their heir executor administrator or assign since the that of october  if not pay on other account shall be apply in further satisfaction of the say  judgement first to discharge the interest and then to sink the principal and  as to so much do reverse the say decree and the defendant appeal from this say  decree to the Lord keeper finch and insist that by his answer to the original  bill say when the pound be pay the judgement be not enter and present after  hear the original cause the late Lord keeper Bridgman call to his assistance  the master of the roll who declare that the defendant shall not account for  any money as receive on the judgement until the say judgement chancery report  er p which be his security be real and chancery report actual enter if the  plaintiff insist as before which be overrule and the plaintiff then bring a  bill of review to which the defendant plead and demurrer and thereupon the  Lord Bridgman declare the decree to be just as to the pound and the decree  make by the Lord Shaftsbury be to unravel the account settle and to charge the  defendant with pound when by the original bill or bill of review they do not  charge he with above the penalty of the say judgement this court now declare  that the examination of the time of the actual entry of the judgement in this  case do not impeach the judgement but only to guide the conscience of the  court in the application of the payment of the money and therefore as this  case be the whole money have be decree and settle as aforesaid the examination  of the time of the actual entry of the say judgement tend not to the  invalidate thereof but only to inform the court when and how it come to be  record which in case of original file to prevent the statute of limitation and  other case of like nature be usual examine in court of law the court see no  Cause to relieve the plaintiff on their bill of review and dismiss their bill  of review