case FURSAKER and Robinson Eq Abr pl S c pale yellow Chan pale yellow Eq Rep S  c vern wms vezey equity will not supply the want of a surrender in behalf of a  natural child one seize of land which by the custom of the manor can only pass  by deed surrender or admittance and have a natural daughter do by deed in  consideration of pound therein mention to be pay by the say daughter grant and  convey those land to her and her heir and she be admit accord but no surrender  be make of these land as the custom require and at the foot of the admittance  be a proviso that her repute father shall hold and enjoy those land for his  life and also in the deed be a covenant for further assurance but for want of  a surrender accord to the custom of the manor this be agree to be a defective  conveyance so this bill be bring against the heir at law to supply the defect  and to have further assurance accord to the covenant and whether this court  can supply it in behalf of a natural daughter be the single question it be  urge for the daughter that she be to be consider as a purchaser have pay pound  for it but it be say on the other side that though the pound be mention in the  deed to be pay yet the plaintiff precedent in chancery can do make any proof  that the money be pay it be then further urge for the plaintiff that after her  birth her father have marry her mother and therefore though she be a bastard  by our law yet by the law of the spiritual court she be look upon as a mulier  puisne though before the marriage she be bastard eigne for that by their law  marriage to follow after to lift sin precedens but of this marriage with her  mother likewise she make no proof then it be urge that she be his natural  daughter he be by the law of nature oblige to provide for her and that this  court ought to supply a defective conveyance intend for that purpose as it  have do in many instance for young child and the rather by reason of the  express covenant for further assurance precedent in chancery er p which they  come here to have a specific performance of and that she ought to be look upon  as a purchaser and to have the benefit of that covenant on the other side it  be argue by sir Thomas powis and other that though the repute father if he  think her to be his child be by the law of nature oblige to provide for her  yet nobody else be that this court be under no such obligation that she be to  be consider now as a mere stranger and to supply a voluntary defective  conveyance for a stranger against a heir at law be what be never attempt  before that she be to be consider as no one son and can not be consider as a  child in any court and that this court be to follow the law in such case that  though her father may have a great affection for her yet that be no such  affection as will raise a use at law that the covenant for further assurance  can not at all help the case where the original conveyance itself be void that  if a man covenant to stand seize to the use of a mere stranger and covenant to  make further assurance this covenant depend on the nature of the conveyance if  that be void the covenant precedent in chancery which be only auxiliary and go  along with the estate must be void too that this be a copyhold that can not be  affect e en by a judgement at law much less by a covenant that will not bind  the heir at law of the copyhold that in the case of kettle and Thompson salk S  c in the time of my Lord summer it be hold that a man be not oblige to provide  for his grandchild vezey and atk S p as he be for his child which be then say  to be in the nature of a debt upon he and as he be oblige to pay his debt this  be a debt of nature which he be likewise oblige to pay but not to his  grandchild but my Lord chancellor seem not to be satisfy with the difference  and say by the statute law of Elizabeth a man be oblige to provide for his  grandchild but as to the case in question the court be of the same opinion for  the reason before give and dismiss the appeal from the roll with wms and as to  the proviso at the foot of the admittance it be hold repugnant and void accord  to a case cro car or cro James and the distinction take in   kite and Quinton