atkins case Bainton and other versus ware April see Holmes v Coghill Ves jun  Fleming v Buchanan l I Ch in re roper roper v Doncaster Ch d SC cite Ves g W  have a power to charge his estate with pound by his will give pound apiece to  his two sister and die in debt to the plaintiff consider as the personal  estate of g W and subject to his debt if a power to dispose by appointment of  a reversion in fee be not make use of yet it shall be asset George ware have a  power to charge Isabel his wife estate with a sum not exceed pound and have by  his will devise pound apiece to his two sister and die in debt to the  plaintiff the question be whether that appointment to the two sister shall be  good to defeat the creditor from have satisfaction out of the pound as part of  George ware be personal estate Mr brown for the plaintiff cite Lassells versus  Cornwallis vern and Shirley versus Ferrer the d or that cause before Lord  Talbot this power be give by a settlement after the marriage of George ware as  follow it provide always and it be hereby further declare by and between the  party to these present that George ware shall by appoint two trustee under any  deed in his lifetime or by his will at his death charge all the wife estate  with a sum not exceed pound Lord chancellor I be of opinion that this ought to  be consider as the personal atkins er p estate of George ware where there be a  general power give or reserve to a person for such use intent and purpose as  he shall appoint this make it his absolute estate and give he such a dominion  over it as will subject it to his debt so Thompson v town Prec Charles vern SC  Lassells v Lord Cornwallis Prec Charles vern SC Ashfield v Ashfield vern  Hinton v toy ante vol townsend v Windham Ves pack v Bathurst post vol white v  Sanson ibidem Troughton v Troughton ibidem for it will be a strange thing if  volunteer as the legatee be shall run away with the whole and that creditor  for a valuable consideration shall sit down by the loss without any relief in  this court the case of Shirley versus Lord Ferrer be direct in point this  money be not settle at all but absolute in the power of George ware and  consequent there can be no doubt but his creditor must have the benefit of it  suppose a man have a power to dispose by appointment of a reversion in fee and  make no disposition of it yet it shall be asset to satisfy specialty creditor  his lordship direct the personal estate to be first apply towards payment of  the debt then the real estate descend and then the pound Reg lib a fol