c anonymous two defendant one privilege priority of suit decree in the Chequer  examine here S c Nels one clerk be rule to answer upon plead the privilege of  the exchequer be a officer there and do answer and so do one Vernon upon the  like plea and the Lord Coventry say that in case the privilege be Allowable  where one single accountant there be sue here yet it be no plea where the bill  be against a accountant and another east v Bittenson caryi as here for there  be no colour for it neither in this case nor any other and whereas it be  object that the chequer have the priority of suit see ante c p note in this  case it be answer that do not appear and that the plaintiff here be stranger  to the suit in the chequer and there be frequent precedent where the defendant  in a court of equity have be admit to a cross suit in another court of equity  without expect the event of the first suit for if the plaintiff in the first  suit surcease or be dismiss the defendant have no help here but by his cross  suit and the chequer freeman er p have suffer new suit there touch matter  judicial settle here and this court have do the like by the chequer and his  lordship declare that he do not conceive any suit in equity between party and  party but the suggestion that the plaintiff be a debtor and accountant to his  majesty be never allow to be dispute and though a demurrer may former have  hold to a bill which omit this suggestion the court will not for such cause  suffer its general jurisdiction as a court of equity to be dispute fowl ex  bring be maintainable in the exchequer but by reason of privilege and that  privilege hold not unless all the plaintiff or defendant be privilege and  therefore as this court do not hinder the proceed freeman in the exchequer so  it do order notwithstanding the say injunction the plaintiff be at liberty to  proceed here and the defendant and his counsel be enjoin not to move in the  exchequer to hinder the proceed of this court for which purpose the plaintiff  here may take a injunction and as for the defendant contempt his lordship will  advice far and the defendant to attend here de die in they accord to a  recognizance to that purpose