c Hungerford v earl all S c vern Eq can ab fraud Roger mortgage land and in he  and the mortgagee convey to the defendant upon trust to pay the debt mention  in the schedule and afterward for provision for himself and his child and the  surplus to the heir in be become bind in a bind to the plaintiff and the  plaintiff freeman prefer his bill to be let into this estate to be satisfy his  debt it be insist for the plaintiff that this be a fraudulent deed there be a  power of revocation in the deed but to that it be answer that it be not a  general power but by consent of trustee ante c p see also the case of saint  saviour rectory lane which do not make it fraud within the statute and so it  be say by Trevor a power to revoke for a particular purpose will not make a  deed fraudulent it be allege for the plaintiff that this deed be only for  payment of part of his debt part be omit out of the schedule if a man make a  settlement for payment of his own proper debt and not to be liable to the  payment of such debt as to which he be only a security it be doubt per curian  whether this will make the deed fraudulent or not but the court incline that  it will because it may be the credit of the security be that which occasion  the lend of the money and Trevor say he once attend my Lord Bridgman upon such  a settlement of his own draw where such debt for which the party be only a  surety be except but my lord Bridgman order the party to pay that debt See  post c p for the reason why the deed be hold fraudulent Hutchins cite two case  where land be devise for payment of debt and legacy that the debt shall have  the preference and that they shall not be pay in pro freeman er p portion and  in one of the case a decree for payment in proportion by Bridgman be afterward  reverse by Nottingham and the debt order first to be pay Roger v Skillicorne  Ambl for though by the that section of the stat of fraudulent devise W and m c  simple contract debt be to be pay acquire step with debt by specialty where  there have be a limitation of land for payment of all just debt that be only  because the equity of both class of creditor be equal but to put a voluntary  legatee on the same foot with a just simple contract creditor will be a  perversion of the very title of the act kidney v Cousmaker Ves ante c p post  append c Reg ib fol the party be order to proceed to a trial at law in order  to ascertain the validity of the say deed of trust and settlement at which  trial the say mortgage or any other matter which can hinder the full trial of  the validity of the say deed be not to be insist on the court declare that  after such trial it will give such order and direction as may be proper but no  further entry relative to the cause have be find