case bower and his wife against cooper procedendo grant in a cause remove by  habeas corpus from London for call a woman a whore ante roll ab roll ab a  supersedeas may issue after procedendo award action on the case in London for  these word speak of the wife thou art a whore and a twopenny whore upon a  habeas corpus this cause be remove I sign a procedendo because I be inform it  be good cause of action in London by the custom for they ought to punish such  person there with cart and whip and that it lie not in this court pheasant now  move to have a supersedeas and the cause remove for he say it be against law  to suffer such action to be prosecute in London upon pretence of a custom  where they be not maintainable in the superior court and that for call one  whore or adulterer and the like a action lie not at the commonlaw vide  register   Murfords case where for these word it be hold a action lie not  croak car stone pray that no supersedeas may be grant for he say a action lie  in London for these word by the custom because a whore there be to suffer  corporal punishment videlicet cart and whip and it be a offence presentable at  croak car er p the wardmote inquest and there punishable so be subject to a  corporal punishment it be reason she shall have her action there and if the  party conceive himself grieve he may have a writ of error and if against law  may reverse it and be cite a case in Trinity term car where such a cause be  remove by habeas corpus a procedendo be award in this court upon debate and so  all the court hold here except Berkley who conceive that a supersedeas ought  to be grant stone allege that by the statute of James c after a procedendo be  grant no supersedeas ought to be award but the whole court be against he in  that point for when a procedendo undue well improvident to flow out the use be  to grant a supersedeas but here it be conceive by Jones Brampston and myself  that the procedendo be well award therefore we deny to grant a supersedeas