BEDYLL against HOLSTOKE a use be limit to a man and woman and the heir of  shear body before the statute of use who afterward intermarry then the statute  passes still they have several moieties and if the husband alien the wife at  his death can only claim a moiety though the issue may have formedon for the  whole in replevin between Bedyll and Holstoke the case be that a feoff be make  before the statute h c to the use of a man and a woman unmarried and of the  heir of their two body beget and afterward they intermarry and after the  marriage the husband bargain and sell the entire land in fee to one of his own  feoff and die without issue and then the statute of be make the wife claim the  whole by the survivorship as tenant in tail after possibility c and by the  opinion of the whole court without argument she can only have the moiety  because the husband and wife shall have moieties like jointtenants by reason  of the jointtenancy make before marriage and yet as to the issue in tail if  there be any he shall have a formedon of the whole c which note and so it be  rule as above the same case in effect be in the assize of Fuljambe against  dyer a er p Linacre in the county of Derby a p m and and the opinion of the  judge of assize be the same there and east Elizabeth in c b between Morgan and  wharton to the son upon evidence in a writ of who the same case in effect save  the alienation of the husband be make after the statute of and the opinion of  Welsh brown and dyer for the moiety of the husband be as above and the verdict  be give accord by a jury of the county of Bedford but Weston e contra S that  the statute vest the possession to the use as a purchase make to the husband  and wife during the coverture which the other justice deny from the word of  the statute S form quality condition c this be the true reason of this case  which be the difference between that and the case in blow   of land recover if  value during the coverture there shall not be moieties although they have  moieties in the land recover against they blow ibidem Nicholls case