case earl of clarendon and Mr bligh and his wife versus hornby Lord chancellor  Parker on a partition in chancery every part of the estate need not be divide  but sufficient if each tenant in common c have a equal share of the whole a  partition be decree of the estate late sir Joseph williamson two three whereof  belong to lady Theodosia Bligh and one three to the defendant Hornby the  estate consist among other thing of a great house call CobhamHouse and  CobhamPark in ken and of farm and land about it of pound per annum the  defendant Hornby insist to have a three of the house and also a three of the  park assign to he by the commissioner who be to make the partition peer  William and this matter come on before the Lord chancellor upon a petition it  be urge on behalf of Mr Hornby that as he be entitle to a three of the whole  so consequent he be to have a three of the house and park and in many case in  the law thing entire in their nature as a house a mill or a advowson may be  divide so a tenant in common shall have half the house every other tolldish  and every other turn of a church c that thus it will be at law in case of a  writ de partition to make and in this case be able sequitur law peer William  er p Lord chancellor care must be take that the defendant Hornby shall have a  three part in value of this estate but there be no colour of reason that any  part of the estate shall be lessen in value in order that the defendant Hornby  shall have one three of it now if Mr Hornby shall have one three of the house  and of the park this will very much lessen the value of both if there be three  house of different value to be divide among three it will not be right to  divide every house for that will be to spoil every house but some recompense  be to be make either by a sum of money or rend for owelty of partition to  those that have the house of less value it be true if there be but one house  or mill or advowson to be divide then this entire thing must be divide in  manner as the other side contend by when there be other land which may make up  the defendant share peer William by the same reason every farm house upon the  estate must be divide which will depreciate the estate and occasion perpetual  contention and it may be the intent of the defendant when this partition be  make to compel the plaintiff to give the defendant forty year purchase for his  three of the house and park therefore since the plaintiff Bligh and his wife  have two three I recommend it that the seat and park be allow to they and that  a liberal allowance out of the rest of the estate be make to the defendant in  lieu of his share of the house and park Bodicoate v steer dick matthews v  bishop of bath well dick turner v Morgan Ves Warner v baines Amb