Andrews the king against Blaney conviction find on the evidence of the  informer only quash ante king v Piercy S p motion by Mr will to quash a  conviction upon the statute of a c S because this be a conviction for two  distinct offence videlicet for hunt with settingdogs and net and also for have  the good in the defendant house whereas both these thing constitute but one  offence and for which there be but one forfeiture the intent of the  legislature be to punish every person who shall kill game that be unqualified  and the have dog c in the house be only consider as evidence of the kill game  as it may be difficult to find person actual commit the fact and the word of  the Act keep or use ought to be construe in this manner that if a person keep  dog c though it be not or can be prove that be use they he shall be punish and  so vice line byit the meaning be not that if be do both he shall be punish for  each which will be punish he twice for the same offence suppose that these be  two distinct offence and punishable several there ought to have be two  distinct conviction all one as there must be two indictment for two distinct  crime it ought to be allege but it be not that the fact be commit against the  form of the statute in a indictment for perjury where this be not aver the  party be punishable at commonlaw only and this case be strong than that  because here the justice have no authority by the commonlaw and nothing can be  intend to give a jurisdiction No forfeiture be impose by this conviction and  consequent it be incomplete and all one as a verdict without judgement and in  the king and Buells a V v king v hawk stram FitzG S p a hill g a conviction  for deerstealing be hold ill for this very fault this conviction appear to be  find only on the evidence of the informer Andrews and this last exception be  admit by Mr Yeates who be the prosecutor counsel to be fatal and he say that  though in Mod it be disallow it be now otherwise upon this objection therefore  without give any opinion in relation to the other the court quash the  conviction S p queen v cobbold pale yellow Rep b r on the same statute