case chapman versus Duncombe Eq can ab pl S c the mortgagee on her marriage  settle the mortgage estate on herself for life remainder to the issue of that  marriage the mortgagor bring a bill to redeem defendant omit set forth the  settlement in her answer the mortgagor have a decree to redeem and pay the  mortgage money afterward the issue of the mortgagee bring a ejectment on the  settlement and recover the mortgage premise the mortgagor relieve have pay his  money pursuant to the decree and have be in no fault the case be that a  mortgagee to wit Ralph stint daughter to her three marriage with one Duncombe  settle the mortgage premise on herself for life remainder on the heir of her  body and after have issue levy a fine and make herself bare tenant for life  remainder to the issue of that marriage the mortgagor afterward bring a bill  to redeem against the mortgagee who answer and mention nothing of this  settlement and thereupon the cause be hear and a redemption decree and the  money pay to the lady Duncombe daughter of Ralph stint the mortgagee and  mother of the now defendant and now after all the say defendant sir William  Duncombe be the issue of the say marriage have by virtue of the settlement  recover at law the bill be to be relieve against that recovery at law and to  have the estate in law reconvey and to be quiet in possession for the  defendant it be insist he be in the nature of a purchaser and claim by the  marriagesettlement and though the estate be subject to a redemption yet then  he ought to have have his proportion of the money in lieu of the land and that  he ought not to lose both for the plaintiff it be say that he have pay the  money Vernon chancery case for which he pawn his land he ought to enjoy it  that he bring his bill and have a decree for redemption and the defendant  mother be a party and if the defendant be cheat it be by his own mother who  make the settlement and afterward conceal it per cur decree the defendant to  convey and the plaintiff in the mean time to enjoy against he and all claim  from by or under he and a perpetual injunction against the judgement Reg lib a  fol vide Legriel v Barker ante p