c Heywood v maunder man et all Lord chancellor trust of a term a term for year  be assign to trustee in trust for the husband for so many year of the say term  as he shall live and afterward for the wife for so many year as she shall live  and after the decease of the wife in trust for such of their child as shall be  then live and their issue and for default of such issue in trust for the  plaintiff for the residue of the say term who bring his bill to have the trust  execute the husband and wife be dead without issue wherein the sole question  be whether this limitation of the trust of a term after die without issue be  good or not per cur in this case it be good enough for although where the  trust of a term be limit to a man and his issue it can be limit over because  issue may continue for ever and the whole term be sink in that limitation nay  where the trust of a term be limit after the death of any one without issue it  be not good as to real estate the rule have very long be undoubted more v  Parker Skinner lady Lanesborough v fox can tempt Talb and as to term of year  there be as Mr Fearne in his treat on exec Dev observe a long series of case  establish the doctrine to be find in pollexfen from p to with which it be  unnecessary to trouble the reader as late authority have so full settle the  point earl of Stafford v Buckley Ves sen because it will make a perpetuity and  issue may continue forever yet in this can see it be upon a contingent which  must determine in a life it be good enough long v blackall t r lamb v archer  Carth Thrustout Denny will the contingent happen that no issue be live and  that be the reason they go upon in the duke of Norfolk freeman S case and  decree for the plaintiff accord and in this case it be say that trust of term  for year ought to be carry as far as the rule of law will possible permit be  now become common settlement upon marriage many estate be hold only by term  for year Sheffield v Lord orrery atk target v gaunt p wms Pinbury v Elkin  ibidem Atchinson v Hutchinson p wms send vide beauclerk v dorm atk crook v de  Vandes Ves Reg lib a fol the plaintiff bill seek to set aside this limitation  be dismiss