case the queen against lane a return to a mandamus to restore a capital  burgess that he write a libel to one of the alderman and thereupon consent to  be turn out be have for a common council can try a libel and a resignation by  parole must be certain S c fort S c ld ray kid on cost a mandamus direct to  the corporation of Gloucester to restore lane to the place of a capital  burgess they return that lane write a certain scandalous letter to one of the  alderman amount to a libel and be charge therewith at a court hold c be  consent to be turn out per curian the common council be not judge of a libel  for that be only triable at commonlaw and suppose it be a libel he shall be  convict of it at commonlaw before it can be allege as a cause of removal and  as to his resignation if they have design it to be a cause of removal it shall  have be return otherwise for here they summon he to show cause why he shall  not be turn out for write libel and he appear and say you may turn I out if  you will but I will bring mandamus and so he do this certain be no resignation  though a resignation may be by parole accord to sir Jonathan Jenningss case a  king v mayor of Rippon ld ray S c salk a modern report but then it ought to  have be return more certain and solemn so the court grant a peremptory  mandamus holt chief justice absent case the queen against shepherd a coroner  inquisition can only be amend in matter of form Mr Raymond move to amend a  faulty inquisition of a felon de see not say super look substantial object he  say this be like the case of a caption of a indictment which may be amend and  cite side sir Edward Northey contra the far they can go be to amend the  caption of a indictment but it be settle in the case of the queen v burdy a  queen whether a that a inquisition can be amend Powell justice the coroner can  amend only matter of form notam some other exception be take first that it be  say to be take in person crowner dom Reg but do not say for what place second  that it be say per sacrament dvodecim verdure a b c without estimable et of  man nor for what place Mr Raymond see the court be against he move to quash  the certiorari first because it set forth that there be a inquisition recently  captain and the common form be only captain second and it appear upon the  return to be take after the testae of the certiorari for that be the  twentyeighth of November Ann Regin and the inquisition be the four of January  and it be recently captain shall tie it down to a inquisition take before sir  Edward Northey contra the certiorari be well as writ of error may be take out  before any judgement give and yet well modern report er p Powell justice holt  chief justice absent captain and recently captain be the same in this case it  be usual to take out certiorar before the inquisition be find as a writ of  error may be take out as soon as the action commence Q then Mr Raymond desire  to have a melius inquirend but per cur it be usual to grant one in this case  for the inquisition must be super look substantial object let the inquisition  be quash and if you will have a melius inquirend modern report it must be upon  another motion and not graft upon this