a mortgage two estate videlicet Blackacre and Whiteacre to b and afterward  mortgage Blackacre to c and after that Whiteacre to d the question be whether  the court can decree a redemption of b s mortgage who be the original  mortgagee by proportionable contribution of c and d the two puisne mortgagee  and Lord chancellor after consideration be of opinion that the court can not  decree such a redemption that the original mortgagee ought not to be entangle  with any a question that may arise among subsequent mortgagee that he have a  right to he redeem entire and not by parcel and his right undoubted stand so  with regard to the mortgagor and consequent with regard to the subsequent  mortgagee for the mortgagor can not hurt he by play his right into another  hand nor be there any precedent where such a redemption be ever allow Dec  Titley and Davis vin Abr pl SC you c Ch n a if a man mortgage all his estate  to one person he may notwithstanding slip it into ten puisne mortgage more now  if all these subsequent mortgagee shall have a right to redeem on payment of  proportionable contribution it will be impossible for the first mortgagee to  come at his right till all those proportion be settle which may and general do  take up a great deal of time and often produce trial at law and after all  there must be so many different redemptions and time give for they either half  year or quarter before he can come at his money or a foreclosure which appear  at first sight to be very inconvenient and will much invalidate the credit of  this kind of security per Lord chancellor ibidem equity case abridge er p so  if those two estate Blackacre and Whiteacre be mortgage to b and then  Blackacre be mortgage to c and after that Whiteacre to d and c redeem b s  whole mortgage he shall hold b both estate though Blackacre only be comprise  in his own mortgage till he be repay all that he have disburse in discharge of  b S mortgage and likewise all that be due upon his own mortgage and d shall  not be admit to redeem he but upon those term for c can not have redeem b but  by a entire redemption of all that be in mortgage to b and have so do he stand  in b s place and have the same right as he have videlicet to be redeem entire  both as against the mortgagor and against d a subsequent mortgagee per Lord  Chan Hardwicke who accord be for affirm a order of the Feb make agreeable to  this opinion by his honour but make no decree the proper party not be before  the court equity case abridge Dec Titley and DavisThe Cause be afterward  revive and as Mr viner say he hear a decree make accord to this opinion ibidem  pl b the chief objection in this case be that by this order Whiteacre which be  not comprise in c s mortgage be notwithstanding charge with his debt but the  Lord chancellor say it be no new thing for a man by a subsequent accident as  by payment of money to gain land as a security for his debt more than he  contract for and which otherwise will not be liable to it and mention the case  of Bovey v smith I Chan can and action and pierce vern ibidem a decree of  foreclosure be make and six month time be give accord to the usual form of  those decree and six month be near expire and then the mortgagor get a order  for enlarge the time for six month more after this he obtain another order for  enlarge the rhyme six month more but part of that order be that he sign the  register book not to ask any further enlargement he sign the register book but  notwithstanding that he have now move that the time may be enlarge six month  more and chief upon this circumstance that the estate be of great value than  the encumbrance upon it amount to Lord Chan Hardwicke be of opinion that upon  that circumstance the motion be reasonable but make it part of his order that  this last time shall be peremptory Jan Barnard Rep n Chan anon a decree of  foreclosure have be make against the defendant and the time for redeem be  expire accord to the computation of lunary month it be move that the defendant  may stand absolute foreclose but Lord Chan Hardwicke be of opinion that the  computation in this case ought to be accord to the calendar month and not  accord to lunary month and accord appoint a further time for the payment of  the money Feb anon ibidem