case the king against the mayor and bailiff OF cambridge see Robarts v mayor c  of London lt to a mandamus to restore a return that the party be removable ad  it pleases without state any other cause be good if warrant by custom or  charter mandamus at the suit of Mr peachy of the Inner temple to be restore to  the office of recorder of Cambridge which be by charter ad boundary vitae or  ad will and they return that they have power to choose a recorder by charter  ad boundary vitae or ad it pleases and that such a day they do choose he ad it  pleases and that such a day they do remove he Mr Wallop take exception to the  return that they mention no cause shower KB the court resolve that they need  not if they have such a custom they choose he habend duty ad it pleases the  dawn c here be cite Blagraves case the steward of read a and in warren case b  it be say that where such a custom be a counsel c may be amoved without show  any cause for it c but not a alderman or freeman and it be resolve that the  cause return be sufficient and Lord chief justice say that Mr peachy know this  custom well enough and may have choose whether he will accept it or not  another exception urge be that it be not allege how he be remove and a  corporation can do nothing but by deed or charter it be answer that he be  remove as he be choose and in case he have be choose by charter he must have  be remove so and the return and cause be allow d a it be say SC Jones that the  court seem to be for the plaintiff send advisare vult b in the case of  Frederick v hook it be say that administration grant pen a suit in the  spiritual court concern the right of administration be good but that a  administration grant pendent light concern a will be utter void Carth but it  be say that this case be never adjudge Wollaston v walker stram that the  distinction take be unfounded SC fitzg and it be adjudge that a administrator  pendent light touch a will may maintain action for the recovery of debt due to  the decease SC Peer wms for the appointment of such a administrator be  necessary to take care of the intestate estate atk and therefore be the only  legal administrator while the letter be unrepealed Wilson v packman cro  Elizabeth he may retain for his own debt style and be liable to action by the  creditor of the intestate ld ray see Bl Rep a side b cro James SC roll Rep c  see king v churchwarden of Thames strange d see king v churchwarden of Taunton  saint James where it be hold a good return to a mandamus that the party be not  duly elect sexton accord to ancient custom shower KB er p