ambler case horn against horn in chancery Nov judgement on bind and no one  good return on a be made fa then plaintiff bring bill to have satisfaction out  of stock in the name of trustee afterward plaintiff take defendant on a can sa  bill dismiss execution on can sa be satisfaction of the debt at law and equity  will not lend assistance No entry in l r Balch v Wastall wms ex part townsend  June ex part stricklin Feb action be bring on a bind for pound and judgement  obtain a be made fa issue against the defendant good and no one good return  after that the plaintiff find the defendant have some public stock in trustee  name file a bill to subject it to the payment of her debt the next term after  the bill be file and before a answer be put in the plaintiff arrest the  defendant body by can sa and he be now in custody it be insist on the part of  the plaintiff that she may have her ambler er p election to waive the can sa  and have satisfaction by a decree out of the trust money and it be say to be  like the case where a creditor prove his debt under a commission of bankruptcy  and proceed by action at law he shall be bind to make his election Lord  Hardwicke take it up on hear plaintiff counsel and dismiss the bill without  cost where there be a equitable demand and the party be take in execution on a  decree this court will notwithstanding issue all its process against his land  and effect and the body be detain be not in this court a satisfaction the  reason be because he be detain for the contempt but at law the detain the body  be a satisfaction and you can afterward take his good this bill be not find on  a original equitable demand but be bring in order that this court may extend  its power to reach what the commonlaw can the stock to be sure be not liable  on the be made fa but suppose it have be in the defendant own name the take  his person in custody have certain protect the stock this be matter mere at  law and the plaintiff have take defendant body by can sa after the bill be  file N B if the plaintiff have not take out can sa the bill have be proper to  subject the stock in the hand of the trustee see tailor v Jones atk but see  dundas v Dutens Cox Ves in MCarthy v gold ball b Lord manner say I listen very  attentive to Lord Thurlow in dundas v Dutens and he be clear of opinion that  choose in action of which description be stock can not be reach by the process  of this court in the case of grogram v cook b b Lord manner again refer to the  judgement in dundas and Dutens and state Lord Thurlow to have say the opinion  in horn v horn be so anomalous and unfounded that forty such opinion will not  satisfy I in the bank of England v Lunn Ves Lord Eldon hold that stock be not  liable to the payment of debt during the lifetime of the proprietor in any way  except under a commission of bankruptcy see also rider v Kidder Ves and sir  Alexander leith case there cite guy v Pearkes Ves nantes v Corrock Ves Francis  v wigzell mad in Cockrane v chamber mich term there be a settlement after  marriage of stock stand in the wife name the husband be at the time in  insolvent circumstance Lord Eldon hold that the insolvency of the husband be  of no importance in such a case the creditor not be able by any act to come at  such a description of property and consequent that the settlement do not delay  the creditor ms and see simmonds v Kinnared Ves