case the king against the mayor and alderman OF Canterbury if a recorder be  liable to removal at the pleasure of the corporation the choose another person  recorder be a declaration of the pleasure of the corporation S c stram  mandamus to restore Mr Randall to the office of recorder the return show that  the charter appoint Mr dubois recorder during life or pleasure of the mayor  and alderman or major part of they and after death or amotion to choose  another et such so often how often casus such to fall upon they show that they  have choose another but not that they have amoved Mr Randall Talbot solicitor  general it be necessary that they show a amotion before they proceed to a  election for a election of another will not amount to a amotion and if a  amotion be modern report necessary they do not show that the corporation be  summon for that purpose though he be a officer during pleasure he be entitle  to a peremptory mandamus reeves contra they show the election et in the same  way as that Randall be amoved and then aver that they do move the say Randall  a election of another be a actual modern report er p amotion vent they be  summon to elect another recorder that be to move the former Talbot solicitor  general in reply some of the corporation will elect a new be tell that the old  recorder have surrender who will not consent to move election and amotion be  two distinct act Raymond chief justice every one be suppose to know the law a  election of a new recorder be in law a actual amotion of the former and one  who come to elect another must determine his will to the former the case in  Ventris seem in point fortescue justice of the same opinion in these case they  may return a amotion or a election of another I see no difference between this  and tenant at will where the landlord may determine his will by express word  or any act which be inconsistent with the estate Reynolds justice I think for  the same reason that it be a good return if a actual amotion be necessary here  be one per curian mandamus quash and the return allow a see king v Thames  stram king v Taunton Cowp king v Pateman term Rep a