case sir William armin against APPLETOFT a prescription by the lord of a manor  to hold a courtbaron before his steward be bad it ought to be before the  suitor Leon Brownl cro Elizabeth Mod   light Inst ld ray hawk p c Cowp in a  declaration for a amercement in a courtbaron it must be allege that the  offence be commit as well as present stram debt upon a amereement in a  courtbaron suppose that he be lord of the manor of Pickworth and that he and  all his ancestor and all who estate he have in the say manor have have a  courtbaron there before his steward to be hold from three week to three week  where it have be use to inquire and present all trespass in the common field  of the say manor and to punish they by amercement and that at such a court  hold before one Robert clerk his steward it be a in the report of this case  Bulst the judge be say to have be unanimous of opinion that as the tenant have  neglect to plead the full age of the demandant before judgement he have  surcease his time and can not assign it for error and the judgement be affirm  by James c on a verdict give in any court of record the judgement thereon  shall not be stay or reverse by reason that the plaintiff in a ejection strong  or in any personal action or suit be a infant under the age of twentyone year  do appear by attorney therein and the verdict pass for he a vide ante croak  James er p present that the defendant commit a trespass in the common field  with his hog for which he be amerce and the amercement afeard by the homage a  at ten shilling et such de other amerciamentis upon nonpayment whereof he  bring this action the defendant plead non debet and find against he and it be  allege in arrest of judgement first that this prescription to have a  courtbaron before his steward be not good for it ought to be in person  sectatoribus The whole court be of that opinion but peradventure he may have  prescribe to have a court to be hold before his steward but not a courtbaron  second because it be not allege that any trespass be commit but quod present  to be that a trespass be commit and for this cause Houghton hold it to be ill  and say that so it have be adjudge before in this court during his time three  because he do not show when the trespass be commit but the court do thereto  give no great regard but for the first fault Montague absent it be adjudge for  the defendant