case SAFFYN against Adam Trinity term Elizabeth roll a grant of in all  respects good et catalla in custodian svan will pass the interest of a term SC    roll Abr Leon Leon Leon comb light Rep skin Carth if a lease in going to be  commence after a fine pass and before the five year expire it shall be bar if  not claim SC   lev cro car   light b Leon Mod Com dig ld ray Bac Abr a lease  in going to be be not bar by a fine and five year nonclaim before the term  commence post   light b   a cro car   pl Com Noy hard salk sheep touch Com dig  Bac Abr Bac Abr cruise on fine will replevin upon a special verdict the case  be that the abbot of b make a lease for year determinable upon the life of  Kellmay and afterward in Henry let the croak James er p land for eighty year  to begin after the determination of the first term king Henry the eight have  afterward the reversion grant it to sentleger in fee the first lease expire  sentleger the grantee of the reversion enter the second lessee before entry  grant in all respects good et catalla in custodian seu possession svan to step  out seu in custodian of any other afterward before any entry by the second  lessee or his grantee sentleger make a feoff in fee and levy a fine with  proclamation the five year expire the question be whether by this fine this  second lease which be but the interest of a term be bar and it be resolve  first that by this gift of in all respects good et catalla in cuslodia svan c  this interest of the term well pass second Walmsley and Daniel hold that the  fine be not any bar for although they all agree that if one have a term in  possession and be oust by he in reversion or a stranger so that his term be  turn into a right if a fine with proclamation be levy of the land and five  year pass without claim that it shall bar yet when a term be to begin at a  future day until the lessee enter he can be oust and he be always quasi in  possession and it be well grantable over and of that whereof one be in  possession as of rend or common c a fine shall never bind he and this point of  the interest of a term be adjudge in Michaelmas term and Elizabeth in b r in  sander v Stanford a that it be not bar by such a fine it be also say that this  fine be of the franktenement and this term be of another thing of another  nature and therefore not levy thereof and the lessor do not any wrong by his  feoff or fine and therefore there need not any claim but it be always save to  he wherefore they hold that this fine be not any bar but Anderson Warberton  and Kingsmil e contra for the statute b extend to the interest of a term  express for they be one equal mischief as a sleep lease of a thousand year  shall bind the purchaser as well as a sleep right or title and therefore there  be as great reason to bar it as any other right and it be not like to rend or  common for a term be a interest in the land whereof the fine be levy but the  other be collateral and the fine be not levy of they but a fine levy before  the beginning of a term shall not bind if he make his claim within five year  after his title come croak throw in be but if he make it not within five year  after he shall be bar and whereas it be say that he be always in possession  that be not so for he can maintain a ejectment or trespass without entry and  the statute which mention interest especial extend thereto for if he enter  after the term commence and be oust then it be not any interest in he but a  right and as to stanfords case it be upon another reason for there he who have  the future interest die the first term expire the lessor enter and levy a fine  with proclamation before any administration commit the five year pass and  after administration be grant the question be whether the administrator shall  have five year and resolve that he shall for none have title of entry before  which differ much from this case and Warberton say that he have see the read  of Catlin where he with diverse other hold that such a interest be present bar  if he do not make his claim afterward in easter term James they give judgement  accord against the opinion of Walmsley and Daniel that the fine be a bar