ambler case embrey against martin may one devise to his son I in tail  remainder to his daughter p in tail remainder to his daughter e in tail  remainder to her son I n alias trig and his heir on condition he pay pound to  the old sister the plaintiff mother at or soon after his be in possession and  for nonpayment the estate shall be to the plaintiff mother I p and e be dead  the plaintiff mother die and afterward the remainder in fee come to I n alias  trig hold the representative of the mother be entitle to the sim see Tunstall  v Bracken ante man v Herbert post emes v Hancock atk Sherman v Collins atk  Jeale v Titckener post Godwin v Monday bro c c see smith v partridge post lib  Reg a foe b S c I ken Walter Neabon by will that may devise his freehold  estate to the use of his son John Neabon for life and to the heir of his body  remainder to his daughter prudence for life and to the heir of her body  remainder to his daughter Elizabeth for life and to her son John Neabon alias  trig and his heir for ever upon condition that he pay to his old sister  plaintiff mother pound at or soon after his be possess of the premise and for  nonpayment the estate shall be to plaintiff mother c and if John Neabon alias  trig shall die before his be possess of the premise then to the next heir male  of Elizabeth trig under the same proviso and condition of pay pound to  plaintiff mother John prudence and Elizabeth Neabon be all dead plaintiff  mother be also dead and since her death the remainder in fee vest in John  Neabon alias trig in possession bill by plaintiff as executor of his mother to  have the pound raise and decree accord by Lord Hardwicke chancellor who say it  be a very plain case the decree direct the pound shall be raise with interest  at per cent from one year after the death of Elizabeth trig the fact be  correct state in the text saint it can not be intend as a mere personal legacy  for not likely plaintiff mother shall live to the time of the remainder vest  in John Neabon alias trig which be after two estate tail in many case money  have be direct to be raise where it be likely the legatee will die before the  event happen d it be a conditional limitation and there be a legal remedy for  raise the money it be a condition subsequent as all condition turn into  limitation be it be to be raise after John trig come into possession ambler  the only doubt be from the devise over be limit to the mother without say her  executor but with a c but it be agreeable to law that it shall extend to her  executor and as the testator be write what will be the law he leave off with  put a c vide Tunstall v Bracken and several case there cite