case curtain against WOLVERSTON Hilary term Elizabeth roll a devise of land in  borough English to a second son he pay twenty pound to each of the daughter of  the devisor at their full age be a condition and not a limitation bait it be  not break unless notice of their full age be give and a demand make Com dig  roll Abr carter Poph dyer cro Elizabeth   light Leon Bac Abr burr trespass  upon demurrer the case be a copyholder in fee of land descendible in borough  English have issue three son and surrender it to the use of his will and by  his will devise it to his middlemost son in fee upon condition that he will  pay to his four daughter to every of they at their full age twenty pound and  die the old son have two daughter and die the middlemost son be admit and do  not pay the say sum at the full age of the say four daughter and the young son  enter in name of the two croak throw daughter of the old son and they  disassent and after he enter in his own name and surrender to the use of the  defendant who be admit enter upon the middle brother who bring trespass the  first question be whether it be a condition or a limitation annex to the  estate for if it be a condition it go to the daughter of the old son second  admit it be a condition whether it be break or not there be not any demand  allege of any of the say twenty pound by any of the four daughter it be hold  by all the justice except William that it be a condition for it shall be  expound accord to the commonlaw where it be not necessary to expound it to the  contrary but where a devise be to a old son upon such a condition if it shall  be expound to be a condition it shall be void and to no purpose for it descend  upon the old son and so shall not hind he to perform it and no remedy against  he and therefore the law shall construe it to be a limitation and no condition  which be the reason in wellock v Hamond a but here there be not any such  reason to construe it to be no condition accord to the word second they  resolve that it be not break without a demand of those sum after their full  age for he be not bind of himself to take notice of their age but after notice  ought to pay it wherefore the condition here be not break and if it be break  he can enter for the daughter without their express direction or appointment  for they have but a title to enter which a stranger without their command can  perform and this point be clear because they have disarm to that entry make  for they wherefore the entry of the young son be not lawful but William hold  that it be a limitation and that it shall go to the young brother who be  inheritable by the custom for otherwise he shall be prejudice which the law  will not suffer but notwithstanding for the reason before give it be adjudge  for the plaintiff