brook against hustler England to wit our lady the queen have send to her  trusty and wellbeloved sir Thomas Trevor Knt her chief justice of the bench  her writ close in these word to wit whether by the grace of God of England  Scotland France and Ireland queen defender of the faith c to her trusty and  wellbeloved sir Thomas Trevor Knt her chief justice of the bench greeting for  as much as in the record and proceed and also in the give of judgement of the  plaint which be in our court before you and your brother our justice of the  bench by our writ between sir William hustler sir Richard Osbaldeston Knts and  William Osbaldeston Esq and Thomas brook late of Overflocton in the county of  York yeoman of a debt of seventy and nine shilling and eleven penny which the  same William Richard and William demand of the said Thomas as it be say  manifest error have intervene to the great damage of the same Thomas as we be  inform by his complaint we Willing that the error if any be be daily amend and  that full and speedy justice be do to the party aforesaid in this behalf do  command you that if judgement be thereupon give then you send to we distinct  and plain under your seal the record and proceed aforesaid with all thing  touch the same and this writ so that we may have they from the day of easter  in fifteen day wheresoever we shall then be in England that we have inspect  the record and proceed aforesaid may cause further to be do thereupon for  amend the say error that which of right and accord to the law and custom of  our kingdom of England shall be meet to be do witness ourselves at Westminster  the second day of march in the second year of our reign Hungerford the answer  of sir Thomas Trevor Knt chief justice withinnamed the record and proceed of  the plaint within mention with all thing touch the same I send before our lady  the queen wheresoever c at the day within contain in a certain record to this  writ annex as I be within command thomas Trevor Salkeld plea enrol at  Westminster before sir Thomas Trevor Knt and his fellow justice of our lady  the queen of the common bench of the term of saint Hilary in the second year  of the reign of our lady whether by the grace of God of England Scotland  France and Ireland queen defender of the faith c roll Yorkshire to wit Thomas  brook late of Overflocton in the county aforesaid yeoman be summon to answer  sir William hustler Knt sir Richard Osbaldeston Knt and William Osbaldeston  Esq of a plea that he render to they seventy and Salkeld er p nine shilling  and eleven penny which he owe to they and unjust detain c and whereupon the  same sir William hustler sir Richard and William Osbaldeston by Robert  Hopkinson their attorney say that our Lord James the first late king of  England be seize in right of his crown of England as of fee and right of and  in the courtleet and view of frankpledge with the appurtenance and all and  every thing which to a courtleet or view of frankpledge belong or in any  manner appertain or ought to belong or appertain within the manor or lordship  village or hamlet of west Bretton Cawthorn Overflocton and Netherflocton in  the say county of York and within the precinct of the same manor or lordship  village and hamlet and every of they in the say county of York be or not be  parcel of the duchy of Lancaster of all resident and inhabit within the manor  or lordship village and hamlet beforesaid and within the precinct of the same  manor or lordship village and hamlet and every or any of they the say  courtleet and view of frankpledge aforesaid to be hold twice by the year  within the manor or lordship village and hamlet aforesaid or any of they or  within the precinct of the same manor or lordship village and hamlet or any of  they at such day and time in the year as the say lord king James the first his  heir or assign shall see fit convenient and necessary accord to the law and  custom of this kingdom of England before the steward of the same lord the king  of that court or the deputy of such steward for the time be and be so seize  the late king James the first afterward by his letter patent under the great  seal of England and under the seal of the duchy of Lancaster in like manner  make bear date at Westminster in the county of Middlesex on the twentyninth  day of June in the thirteenth year of his reign in England and the fortyeighth  in Scotland which the say sir William hustler sir Richard and William  Osbaldeston here in court produce as well for and in consideration of the sum  of twenty shilling of lawful money of England well and true to be pay at the  receipt of his exchequer at Westminster to his own use by his belove subject  George Wentworth of Bulkliffe in west Bretton in the county of York gentle  whereof the same Salkeld late lord the king do acknowledge himself to be full  satisfy and pay as for diverse other good cause and consideration the same  lord the king especial move of his especial grace and certain knowledge and  mere motion do give and grant for himself his heir and successor to the say  George Wentworth his heir and assign for ever that they shall and may have  hold and enjoy within the manor or lordship village or the hamlet of west  Bretton Cawthorn Overflocton and Netherflocton and every of they in the say  county of York and within the precinct of the same manor I or lordship village  and hamlet and every of they in the say county of York be or not be parcel of  the say duchy of Lancaster a courtleet and view of frankpledge to be hold of  all the resident and inhabitant and other resident come within the lordship or  manor village and hamlet aforesaid and within the precinct of the same manor  or lordship village and hamlet and every or any of they to hold the say  courtleet and view of frankpledge twice by the year from time to time within  the manor or lordship village and hamlet aforesaid or any of they or within  the precinct of the same manor or lordship village and hamlet or any of they  at the same place day and time at which the say George Wentworth his heir or  assign shall see fit convenient and necessary accord to the law and custom of  this kingdom of England before the steward of the same g Wentworth his heir  and assign for the time be or before the deputy of such steward for the time  be and all and whatsoever to the say courtleet or view of frankpledge belong  or in anywise appertain or in any manner ought to belong or appertain and also  all and singular amerciament fine forfeiture pain penalty perquisite profit  liberty preeminence privilege right and jurisdiction whatsoever which at the  say courtsleet or view of frankpledge to the say lord the king or his  successor in any manner whatsoever may or ought to belong by virtue of which  say letter patent the say George Wentworth be seize as of fee and right of and  in the courtleet and view of frankpledge aforesaid with the appurtenance and  hold diverse court and view of frankpledge within the manor or lordship  village or hamlet of west Bretton Cawthorn Overflocton and Netheracton  aforesaid accord to the gift and grant aforesaid in the letter patent contain  and the say George be so seize of the courtleet and Salkeld er p view of  frankpledge aforesaid with the appurtenance afterward to wit on the second day  of June in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred and thirtyeight at  Netherflocton aforesaid die after who death the say courtleet and view of  frankpledge with the appurtenance do descend to William Wentworth gentle as  son and heir of the say George whereby the say William Wentworth son and heir  of the say George be seize as of fee and right of Salkeld and in the courtleet  and view of frankpledge aforesaid with the appurtenance and be so seize  thereof the same William afterward to wit on the four day of march in the year  of our Lord one thousand six hundred and thirtynine at Netherflocton aforesaid  die without any issue of his body after who death the say courtleet and view  of frankpledge with the appurtenance descend to Thomas Wentworth Esq afterward  sir Thomas Wentworth baronet as brother and heir of the say William Wentworth  whereby the say Thomas Wentworth as brother and heir of the say William  Wentworth be seize of and in the courtleet and view of frankpledge aforesaid  with the appurtenance as of fee and right and be so seize thereof the say sir  Thomas afterward to wit on the first day of April in the year of our Lord one  thousand six hundred and seventysix at Netherflocton aforesaid die without any  issue of his body issue after who death the say courtleet and view of  frankpledge with the appurtenance do descend to sir Matthew Wentworth baronet  as brother and heir of the say sir Thomas Wentworth whereby the say Matthew as  brother and heir of the say sir Thomas Wentworth be seize of and in the  courtleet and view of frankpledge aforesaid with the appurtenance as of fee  and right and be so seize thereof the same sir Matthew afterward to wit on the  second day of August in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred and  seventyeight at Netherflocton aforesaid die after who death the say courtleet  and view of frankpledge with the appurtenance descend to sir Matthew Wentworth  baronet as son and heir of the say sir Matthew Wentworth the brother whereby  the say sir Matthew Wentworth the son be seize of and in the courtleet and  view of frankpledge aforesaid with the appurtenance as of fee and right and  the say sir Matthew the son be so seize thereof afterward to wit on the eight  day of December in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred and  ninetythree at Netherflocton aforesaid by a certain indenture of bargain and  sale make between the say sir Matthew Wentworth the son of the one part and  the say sir William hustler sir Richard Osbaldeston and William Osbaldeston of  the other part the other part whereof seal with the seal of he the say sir  Matthew the son the same sir William sir Richard and William Osbaldeston  produce here in court the date of which be the same day and year in  consideration of five shilling to he in hand pay by the say sir William sir  Richard and William Osbaldeston bargain and sell to they the say sir William  sir Richard and William the say courtleet and view of frankpledge with the  appurtenance to have and to hold to the same sir William hustler sir Richard  and William Osbaldeston their executor administrator and assign from the day  of the date of the say indenture to the end and term of one year then next  follow and full to be complete and end by virtue Salkeld of which say bargain  and safe and by force of the statute in that behalf make and provide of  transfer use into possession the same sir William hustler sir Richard and  William Osbaldeston be in the possession of the courtleet and view of  frankpledge aforesaid for that term and be thereof so possess and the say sir  Matthew Wentworth the son be seize of the reversion of the courtleet and view  of frankpledge aforesaid with the appurtenance as of fee and right afterward  to wit on the nine day of December in the year of our Lord one thousand six  hundred and ninetythree abovesaid at Netherflocton aforesaid by a certain  other indenture make between he the say sir Matthew Wentworth the son of the  one part and the say sir William hustler sir Richard Osbaldeston and William  Osbaldeston of the other part the other part whereof seal with the seal of the  say sir Matthew the son the same sir William hustler sir Richard and William  Osbaldeston produce here in court the date whereof be the same day and year  last above mention be the say sir Matthew Wentworth the son release to the  same William hustler sir Richard and William Osbaldeston their heir and assign  all the estate right title and interest of he the say sir Matthew Wentworth  the son of and in the courtleet and view of frank Salkeld er p pledge  aforesaid with the appurtenance by virtue of which premise the say sir William  hustler sir Richard and William Osbaldeston be and still be seize of and in  the courtleet and view of frankpledge aforesaid with the appurtenance as of  fee and right and that Thomas brook on the twentyfourth day of April in the  year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and three and long before be  resident and a inhabitant at Overflocton aforesaid within the jurisdiction of  the leet and view of frankpledge aforesaid and ought to do suit at the court  of view of frankpledge aforesaid and they the say sir William hustler sir  Richard and William Osbaldeston be so as aforesaid seize of the courtleet and  view of f rankpledge aforesaid with the appurtenance the courtleet and view of  frankpledge aforesaid be hold at Netherflocton aforesaid within the manor and  lordship aforesaid the say twentyfourth day of April in the year of our Lord  one thousand seven hundred and three before Richard Witton Esq steward of the  say sir William hustler sir Richard and William Osbaldeston of that court of  which court so to be hold due notice be give to the resident and inhabitant  within the manor lordship village and hamlet aforesaid to wit at Netherflocton  aforesaid and that the say Thomas brook do not do his suit nor appear at that  court but make default wherefore at the same court by the juror who be swear  and charge in the same court to inquire and present those thing which  appertain to the say courtleet and view of frankpledge it be present upon  their oath that the say Thomas brook then be resident and a inhabitant Salkeld  within the manor aforesaid and within the jurisdiction of the court of view of  frankpledge aforesaid and ought to have do suit to the court of view of  frankpledge aforesaid and that the say Thomas brook although he be then  solemnly summon do not appear but make default by reason whereof the same  Thomas brook be then and there by the same court amerce which say amerciament  by Joseph senior and Timothy road then resident and inhabitant within the  manor aforesaid then and there choose and swear affeerors by the same court be  then in due manner afeard to thirtynine shilling and eleven penny of lawful  money of England whereof the say Thomas brook afterward to wit the day and  year last mention at Netherflocton aforesaid have notice whereby a action  accrue to the same sir William hustler sir Richard and William Osbaldeston to  demand and have of the say Thomas brook the say thirtynine shilling and eleven  penny parcel of the aforesaid seventynine shilling and eleven penny and  whereas also the say Thomas brook afterward to wit on the first day of July in  the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and three at Netherflocton  aforesaid borrow of the say sir William hustler sir Richard and William  Osbaldeston forty shilling residue of the aforesaid seventynine shilling and  eleven penny to be pay to the say sir William hustler sir Richard and William  Osbaldeston when he shall be thereunto require nevertheless the say Thomas  brook although often request have not yet pay the aforesaid seventynine  shilling and eleven penny nor any part thereof to the same sir William hustler  sir Richard and William Osbaldeston or either of they but have hitherto refuse  and still refuse to pay the same to they or any of they wherefore they say  that they be injure and have damage to the value of one hundred shilling and  thereupon they bring suit c and the aforesaid Thomas brook by Henry wood his  attorney come and defend the force and injury when c and say nothing in bar or  preclusion of the say action of the say sir William hustler sir Richard and  William Osbaldeston whereupon the same sir William hustler sir Richard and  William Osbaldeston remain against the say Thomas brook thereupon undefended  therefore it be consider that the say sir William hustler sir Richard and  William Osbaldeston do recover against the say Thomas brook their say debt and  their damage by occasion of the detention of that debt to eight pound by the  court here adjudge to the same sir William hustler sir Richard and William  Osbaldeston by their assent and the same Thomas brook in mercy c afterward  that be to say on Tuesday next after eight day from the day of saint Hilary in  the same term before the lady the queen at Westminster come the aforesaid  Thomas brook by Thomas Harvey his attorney and say that in the record and  proceed aforesaid and also in give of the judgement aforesaid Salkeld er p  there be manifest Salkeld error in this to wit that the declaration aforesaid  in the record aforesaid mention and upon which the judgement aforesaid in form  aforesaid be give and the matter in the same contain be not sufficient in law  to have or maintain that judgement thereupon give in form aforesaid and so the  say judgement thereupon in form aforesaid give be erroneous and void in law  and therefore in that there be manifest error there be error also in this that  where it appear by the say record that the say judgement in form aforesaid  give be give for the say sir William hustler knight sir Richard Osbaldeston  knight and William Osbaldeston against he the say Thomas brook whereas by the  law of the land of this kingdom of England judgement in the plea aforesaid  ought to have be give for the say Thomas brook against they the say sir  William hustler sir Richard Osbaldeston and William Osbaldeston and therefore  in that there be manifest error and be pray that the say judgement for the  error aforesaid and other be in the record and proceed aforesaid be revoke  annul and altogether deem as none and that the same Thomas brook be restore to  all thing which by occasion of the judgement aforesaid he have lose and that  the say sir William hustler knight sir Richard Osbaldeston knight and William  Osbaldeston may rejoin to the error aforesaid c and the say sir William  hustler knight sir Richard Osbaldeston knight and William Osbaldeston by  Adrian more their attorney come and forthwith say that there be not any error  either in the record and proceed aforesaid or in the give the judgement  aforesaid and pray that the court of the lady the queen now here may proceed  to the examination as well of the record and proceed aforesaid as of the  matter aforesaid by he the say Thomas brook above assign for error and that  the judgement aforesaid be in all thing affirm Salkeld plead before the lord  the king and the lady the queen at westminster OF the term OF the holy trinity  in the three year OF the reign OF our lord William and lady mary now king and  queen OF England c roll