case the king against the parish OF ISLIPP in what case the absence of a  servant during part of the year will not prevent his gain a settlement S c  stram S c fort the case on a special session order appear thus Henry Wilson at  the statute be hire by William Jones for a year from Michaelmas then next and  during the year he be sick two day and go for three day to see his mother who  be sick but upon his return his master receive he again deduct sixpence off  his wage for the time he have be absent which he agree to at the end of the  year the servant go to a statute against his master leave the master save he  shall go for good and all he refuse to go on those term but do go and return  no more during the service the master often say that the servant shall not  gain a settlement at Islipp Mr Hawkins a discontinuance or to be remiss of a  service in the middle of a term prevent a settlement as well as at the end if  a servant lie out one night the master be not bind to take he again or pay  wage for the time pass a see king v Marlborough Mod a the master and servant  shall not by their agreement make the parish liable that be not so Pratt chief  justice the master may give his consent to let he go then if be be absent for  any time without leave the master by take he again give his consent Eyre  justice the service for a year must be such as usual service be this term  Pratt chief justice deliver the resolution of the court during his sickness he  be in service b see king v Christchurch burr S c king v Madlington burr S c  king v Sharrington Bott b the master receive his service again when he go to  his mother continue his service within the intent of the Act for he have  dispense with his absence as to the last fact as this case be it be well  enough for first the servant in a dutiful manner desire his master leave to go  on a honest and just account and the master ought not to have refuse it and  the servant not agree to the dissolution of the service but insist upon the  continuance of it and the master have refuse the liberty although he do not  return it be sufficient modern report to gain a settlement the rather for that  it appear in the order that the master several time say that his service shall  not gain a settlement therefore he be settle at Islipp