boulton versus Hillesden merchant S apprentice draw a bill and charge the  master if a merchant S apprentice draw a bill as I do promise to pay such a  sum for my master to charge the master with this note there ought to be either  a authority precedent or a consent subsequent or that the master have entrust  he with his affair otherwise the master shall not be Chargeable by action with  the note of his servant Comberbach Northi if a servant usual buy good for his  master and he pay for they he shall be Chargeable for all thing of the like  nature that the servant buy though they never come to his use but if he have  never any authority though he buy in his name he shall not be liable holt Ch I  I remember the case of sir Robert wiseman who allow d his servant so much per  week to furnish his house with victual and other necessary and every Saturday  night a account be make of the expense of the week and allowance for the same  and noauthority give to the servant to run on score with any one yet it be  hold that the master be Chargeable with all debt contract by the servant for  thing usual buy for do ought to receive prejudice by the servant of another  especial since they be not conusant of the particular agreement between the  master and servant die Mercury post term paschae at guildhall land per Mather  a widow take her husband S good Sans administration if a widow after the death  of her husband seize his good without take letter of administration although  she afterward dispose of they by will or otherwise yet be that take out letter  of administration to the husband may bring trover for these good for a  administrator may have trover for good take after the death of the intestate  Comberbach er p and before administration commit and although he declare of  good take out of his own possession whereas they be take before he be  administrator yet it be good enough for the administration shall have relation  to the death of the intestate per holt Ch I though he think it a hard case if  a foreign bill be draw upon a English merchant Payable at so many day sight  though the day incur without any notice give to the party on who it be draw  yet that bill accord to the custom of merchant may be protest and thereby  recourse bad to the first drawer for the money which holt Ch I think  unreasonable because the drawer ought not to lie at the mercy of he that have  the bill c per shower if a bill be draw for like value receive and this be  protest a indebitatus assumpsit lie against the drawer