coat against wade TR car rot ante rend lindly pray judgement in debt on a  annuity out of land grant to craven and another of S a year which by the death  of the other come to craven and from he to the plaintiff because there be a  place of the grant and other place of death whereupon issue may be take but  however want of place be aid by the statute h of Jeoffails the say it come to  he by several assignment be Keble er p sufficient especial after verdict  though on demurrer not and Hub in herd against Baskervells case pl be that  this be but form after verdict and it be but matter of fact which on nil debet  plead may now be presume to be give in evidence like a prescription that owner  of enclosure ought to repair ancient must show their estate but now the  defendant in trespass or the plaintiff be a stranger it be sufficient to lie  it in occupier Jones pro defendant want of place be not here aid because the  visne here can be presume in any place also the and estate be not matter of  form but substance and the prove one assignment too many or too few have  nonsuted many at the nisi prius Keeling say all age be not of this opinion nor  be the contrary strange for of thing in grant a and estate can be plead  without particular show the estate but as Elizabeth dyer in a account and  Edward it be very reasonable that the plaintiff be in by livery and a stranger  may well allege this and estate as well on a lease for year as of fee for both  be alike traversable which Twisden agree be after a verdict though it may not  be good on demurrer also on the part of the defendant though not on the part  of the plaintiff Windham ad idem some book as l   ab say a and estate can be  of a lease for year nor and estate Br it can be of a particular estate Keble  but the law doubtless be contrary where it be aver that the particular estate  continue as here it be this be the general rule but none can plead a and  estate to himself as dyer without show how because be be party Com pound and  do know his estate but on demurrer this have be nought and that be after a  verdict but I think in reason that a man may well enough allege a and estate  in a stranger without show the mesne assignment and Cr be durus sermon and not  consonant to the rule of law and these late numerous authority guide he only  as consonant to the natural reason of the old book and it will be hard to  supply this by put the party to his oath in chancery and this very case be  resolve to be good after verdict without notice take of the verdict James but  in debt for the refit the purchaser must show all the mesne assignment but the  conveyance of the land he be a stranger to and therefore need not show they  but say that by mesne assignment it be come to the defendant as here but if a  man set forth the mesne assignment then if be vary it be his own folly Moreton  ad idem Keeling say that a man may plead a and estate of a lease for year to  himself and so be dyer and Twisden say the several assignment may be give in  evidence by recital show possession have go accord in ejectment which Windham  agree where the original lease be show and have continuance judgement pro  plaintiff nisi