BEAUCHAMP contra SILVERLOCK car foe orphan money that William Beauchamp the  plaintiff father be a freeman and citizen of London by his last will give a  three part of his land and tenement whatsoever and wheresoever to the  plaintiff and appoint Dorothy his wife guardian to his child and make her sole  executrix and Richard Camden Robert Cheslyn chancery report John pace and  hogan hovel overseer and the say Dorothy make her will afterward and give the  great part of her estate to the plaintiff and will her brother hogan hovel and  her sister Margaret Cheslyn and the survivor of they to be guardian to her  child and make the say hogan hovel and Margaret hovel her executor and die  that by article of agreement between hogan hovel Robert Cheslyn and Margaret  his wife recite the will of Dorothy Beauchamp whereby they agree to administer  the estate to the best benefit of the child and exhibit a true inventory into  the prerogative court and that they shall with the consent and not without the  consent and knowledge of each other use their best endeavour to get in the  estate and not to release any part of it without each other consent and that  if hogan hovel shall die and Margaret survive then the executor or  administrator of hogan hovel to make a true account to Margaret of all the  estate which he shall receive of the say testator and pay the same to Margaret  or to such person who shall by the consent of the say William Beauchamp the  plaintiff be choose as guardian to receive the same or to such person to who  by right or law the same ought to be pay and the same agreement chancery  report and covenant be if the say Margaret shall die and hovel survive that  Robert Cheslyn die and the say Margaret marry the defendant James Silverlock  and hogan hovel possess himself of the great part of the personal estate of  the plaintiff say father and mother and receive the profit of the land of the  say Margaret receive only Title as executor that hogan hovel make his will and  mary his wife executrix and afterward the guardianship of the plaintiff the  orphan be at his friend decree commit to sir William Bateman chancery report  er p that the say mary hovel the executrix of hogan exhibit a account the  orphan court of the money receive by her husband belong to the plaintiff out  of which allowance be make there rest due to the plaintiff pound and that  afterward the defendant Silverlock and Margaret his wife the survive executrix  of Dorothy do by their deed empower sir William Bateman then repute a man of  great estate to receive of MaryHovell executrix of hogan hovel who be the  other executor of the say Dorothy the say pound to the use of the plaintiff  and to give a discharge for the same that sir William Bateman receive it  chancery report accord and give a discharge for it in the name of Silverlock  and his wife and give security after that to the court of alderman to pay the  plaintiff pound that mary hovel die and make executor that the plaintiff do  several time after he come of age own sir William Bateman to be his debtor for  the pound that the plaintiff receive of sir William Bateman pound and give  acquittance for it the first be on the four of January the last on the  twentyfifth of July that the plaintiff come of age in December and the say sir  William Bateman become insolvent at Christmas the question touch the say pound  claim by the plaintiff and whether the same shall be charge on the defendant  Silverlock and survive executor of Dorothy Beauchamp or on the defendant sir  William Bateman who have give security to the Chamber of London as aforesaid  for the plaintiff use this court as to the executor of mary hovel declare  there be no reason to charge they therewith but that they ought to be  discharge and dismiss from be Accountable for the same and as to the defendant  Silverlock the case be as aforesaid declare that there be a clear intention of  all party to perform the chancery report article aforesaid and that the say  defendant Margaret never receive any estate during hogan hovel life and that  sir William Bateman be choose by the consent of the friend of the plaintiff  and by the order of the court of orphan appoint guardian to the plaintiff she  the say Margaret give in a account to the court and empower sir William  Bateman to receive the money who before have give security to answer the same  or the great part thereof and when the plaintiff come of age he admit and own  sir William Bateman to be his guardian and receive several sum of money from  he and sir William prove not insolvent till three year after and so there be  no default in the say defendant Margaret there be no reason to charge her the  say Margaret with the same but that she ought to be dismiss and discharge from  the same but sir William have give security to the court of orphan for pound  part of the say pound by he receive by order of the defendant Margaret and  that for the residue be pound S there be no security give by the say sir  William this court declare that the defendant Margaret ought to be charge with  the same and decree accord but not with interest for it