ccxxxvi SALWAY and LUSONS case Writ of right abatement of a Writ visne Matthew  Salway bring a writ of right against luson and the writ be message sharp  jampnor bruerae and exception be take to the writ because jampnor bruerae be  count together where they ought to be distinguish several as so many sharp  jampnor and so many sharp Bruer although it be object on the part of the  demandant in the maintenance of the writ that in the register the writ of  right be return One librae of cleave and mace together without distinction or  severance and it be say that in a writ of right we ought to follow the  register and therefore a writ of right be abate because this word orchard be  put in the writ for in the register there be no such writ because the word  gardinum comprehend it but in other writ as writ of entry c it be otherwise  see the case of the Lord zouch two Elizabeth in a writ of enter sur seize  mille sharp Jampnor bruer but this exception be not allow for it may be that  jampnor bruer be so promiscuous that they can be distinguish vide h the  respect the justice have to the register be such as they change their options  and conform the same to the register another exception be take to the writ  because thereby the demandant do demand two part watch deal hay in the forest  of c and the court be of opinion that the writ ought to be duty watch two a  part de hay c and not two part watch as legal support two a part church and  not two part church another exception because the writ be two part c in three  dividend where it shall be diviz for dividend be not in any writ but only in a  writ of partition and by Windham the part of this office be divide in right  which the court grant another exception be take because that in the writ it be  not set down in what town the forest of c be so as the court do not know from  whence the visne shall come for no venire shall be de vicineto forest as de  vicineto hundredi manor and the same be hold to be a material exception  another exception be take because a writ of right do not lie of a office for  at the commonlaw au assize do not lie of it but now Leonard Leonard er p it do  by the statute of west cap for it be not book be but the party grieve be put  to his quod to let pass and of this opinion be the whole court Len cro mich  Elizabeth in the common plead