case William BUSSFIELD against John BUSSFIELD easter term James roll in c b a  award shall not be intend out of the term of the submission unless it be so  aver but if it contain matter not submit it be void as to so much ante   cro  car roll ab hut lev cro Elizabeth if a submission be so that the award be  ready to be deliver at l on that c quaere if a allegation that it be make at t  on the that adtunc et ibidem ready to be deliver at l be sufficient ante error  in debt for a hundred pound on a award make at castrum Eborum upon a  submission make saint December James of all matter and controversy betwixt  they ita quod the say arbitrament be make under the hand and seal of the  arbitrator ad well ante the five of December follow ready to be deliver at the  shop of George hill in the exchange London and show that they make their  arbitrament under their hand and seal at Castr Ebor adtunc et ibidem parat to  be deliver at the say shop of the say George hill in the exchange London and  thereby arbitrate that John Bussfield shall pay to William Bussfield a hundred  pound and that one shall release to the other all action and demand from the  that of November next before and that they shall pay ten shilling to the  writer of the award for his pain and it be thereupon demurrer for it be  pretend that here be not any award accord to the submission for the submission  croak throw be saint December James of all matter and demand before the say  time and it reconditioned ita quod c this award to release all demand be  before the that November and so omit two day before the submission there may  be diverse controversy between the say time which be not arbitrate and  therefore it be no award accord to the submission say non allocatur for it  shall not be intend unless it have be show but if it have be show that there  be controversy depend raise in those two day which be not before then the  arbitrament have be void in all but for the award of the ten shilling to be  pay to the writer it be void in this point a wherefore it be adjudge for the  plaintiff but now error be bring and assign in matter of law the court of the  king bench agree to affirm the judgement but it be then move that the  declaration be not good for it be declare that the make and deliver their  award at castrum Eborum quarto December adtunc et ibidem parat to be deliver  at the shop of George hill at London and it be a vide the statute Edward c  Elizabeth c Elizabeth c but now by the will c and Geo c this kind of trade be  permit under the regulation describe in those statute see burn Jus edit p a  ante roll ab bunb croak James er p allege that this be a void publication and  delivery for it ought to be publish and deliver at the exchange in London  where the party be to expect it and not at any other place and for this cause  it be void and not accord to the submission Doderidge and Houghton be of that  opinion for it be reason it shall be publish and ready to be deliver at the  place appoint where the party be to expect it and not at any other place for  the party have not by intendment any cognizance of such delivery and there be  a day and place appoint they need not to seek it in other place nor to take  cognizance of such delivery and as they may deliver it at the castle at York  so they may deliver it at any part beyond sea and the party may as well take  knowledge of the one as the other but Montague chief justice hold that this  publication there and the allegation that it be adtunc et ibidem read to be  deliver at the say shop in the exchange be sufficient wherefore the court will  advice note this exception be not take in the common plea