case STEIGNES versus STEIGNES at the roll eoden die the word movable in its  full sense take in all personal chattle Mr solicitor general for the plaintiff  baron Steignes make his will in French and give his wife beside all his  movable plate jewel picture linen c except mosely report er p his three book  of miniature and his whole library pound south sea stock and the question be  what passes by the French word meubles which be translate movable in the will  to which the probate be annex and by which we must go but in the French  signify only household good supellectilia the wife insist that by this word  all the personal estate be devise to her whereas the other word confine the  sense of it and show the testator only mean it of thing corporeal as plate  jewel linen and the c can never extend it to foreign thing the several species  he enumerate be corporeal and there be no specification of any thing  incorporeal so stock and debt do not pass and in the mosely report conclusion  of his will he devise all his other pretence to his wife or for the benefit of  his adopt son which take all his debt out of the word movable and the  intention of the testator be also plain from another clause of his will  whereby if his wife marry he give her the plate jewel and other movable in the  first clause for life only Mr attorneygeneral for the defendant the word  movable in this will can be confine to household good for then there will be  no reason for the exception for his library and three book of miniature will  not pass by the word movable for they be not household good nor be they  comprehend under the particular nor be the word confine to be thing corporeal  but it be to be extend to stock debt c for good nobilia not only comprehend  all corporeal thing but right credit and all personal chattle but the  plaintiff say the testator have restrain this general sense of the word by use  it with the word plate jewel picture linen which show he mean something of  that kind but the c plain intimate that the testator do not intend to confine  the word to those particular but to take in other thing and leaves the word to  be understand in its full legal sense master of the roll I be of opinion that  the word movable in this will comprehend only corporeal movable though if  there be nothing to restrain the meaning of it in this clause or in the other  part of the will the word will take in the whole pure personal estate the word  plate jewel picture linen will not confine the generality of the word though  they be only corporeal thing for c must signify et the nobilia nor be the  sense of it restrain by the exception but the testator by say that his wife  shall have pound south sea stock beside all his movable show that in his  understanding of the word movable will not comprehend stock for it will be  absurd to say she shall have all my stock and pound south sea stock beside and  he have give away his debt in another clause and the word can be confine to  household good for he have particular mention his jewel which be not household  good Swinb Fol go Jon spark versus den Swinbl part sect n mosely report  Wednesday February the that