coke a WYMARKS case mich Elizabeth in the king bench when any deed be show in  court the deed by judgement of law remain in court all the time in which it be  show but not after and in another term the defendant shall not have oyer of it  coke report b er p when a deed be by one show to the court it be not  respective as to he but all other shall take advantage thereof if letter  patent be enrol in any court of record they may be plead there without show  they if a deed be plead in court and show and deny it shall remain in court  for ever if a deed be deny in one court it may be plead in another without  prefert if one party improper get the deed into his custody and detain it the  other shall plead it without profert tenant by statute merchant or staple c  shall not show the deed otherwise of a lessee for life or year in b r no entry  of imparlance or continuance be make on any replication rejoinder c although  deliver of a subsequent term otherwise of a plea Vid the entry   Ent pl Abel  do bring a ejection firm against William law and declare of a lease make by  Richard Sleford Nov Elizabeth of a house c in north luffenham in the county of  Rutland for three year the defendant plead that ante prd time quo c the say  Richard Sleford be seize in fee of the tenement aforesaid and maii Elizabeth  by his deed indent and enrol within six month accord to the statute quod  indeed scribe indentat hic in a lane a Cur prefert c bargain and sell the say  tenement to Edward Wymark gentle in fee by which and by force of the statute  he be seize till by the say Sleford seize who make the lease in the  declaration mention on who the defendant by the commandment of Edward Wymark  enter c to which the plaintiff reply and confess the bargain and sale by the  say deed enrol to the say Wymark modam form prout c et idem Abel of one  another to say quod in eoden scribe indentato to will step forth modus form  following videlicet quod si prd Edward Wymarke c do not pay Nov to Sleford c  that then the say bargain and sale shall be void and show the breach of the  condition and reentry and the lease make to the plaintiff and the ejectment  prout in the declaration without that that the say Sleford seize the say  Edward Wymark c on which the defendant do demurrer in law and show this cause  accord to the statute a   a b   light a Elizabeth cap a because the plaintiff  in his replication do not show forth the deed indent which comprehend the  condition and after good debate and consideration of the matter in law it be  adjudge for the plaintiff and in this case two point be resolve by Popham  chief justice and the whole court coke b when any deed be show in court the  deed by judgement of law do remain in court b   light b   b a postea b Edward  a hard b all the term in which it be show a but letter testamentary or of  administration be not suppose to remain in court all the term for the party  may have occasion to produce they elsewhere Robert v Arthur salk SC Mod a but  at the end of the term if the deed be not deny then the law do adjudge it to  be in the custody of the party to who it belong for the whole term in law be  but one c   a godb c day and therefore it shall be intend to remain in court  all the term in which it be show but when the term d   light b   b   b   b h  pl Edward h e a d be close and end then there be no officer in such case to  who the custody of it by the law belong and therefore the party who show it  shall have the keep of it for a man evidence be as the sinew of his land and  where it appear by h a b that because the deed in another term be in the  custody of the party and not in court the defendant shall not have e Doct pl  Goldsb Br Laches Br oyer de record c Br Contin Fitzherbert monst de faits c e  over of it and there coke report a er p with agree h h b b Acc king v Emery TR  and as a general imparlance be always to a subsequent term it follow that oyer  of a deed can be demand after such imparlance mayor of London v Gorrey lev a  different doctrine be indeed lie down in one case anon Mod which must be  understand of a special imparlance to another day in the same term Tidds  practice that edition b also vide light fol b if the tenant in assize plead a  feoff by deedpoll of the plaintiff and show it in court in this case light f  light sect f say that forasmuch as the deed be in court the feoff may show to  the court how that in the deed there be several condition c but that be to be  intend that he shall take advantage of the condition in the deed in the same  term that it be plead and show four and therewith agree e b that when a deed  be in court one may take advantage of it without have it in hand e a and ass  pl send for and in e title feoffm g Fitzherbert feoff faits g faits in assize  against sundry tenant some plead as to one parcel the deed of the ancestor of  the pl to they with warranty show forth in court and some other of the tenant  as to other parcel plead in bar by the same deed without have it in hand and  it be challenge for that the deed ought to be show the court against one the  other can not have advantage of the same deed without show non allocatur note  when the deed be by one show to the court it be not respective as to he but  all other shall take advantage thereof e a in the abbot of Walthams case if a  Br show de faits c Br plead in fine palm a letter patent be enrol in any court  of record one may plead they in the same court without show they  notwithstanding that they be not plead before and difference be take between  letter patent or other matter of record which of their own nature be of record  and matter in fact for although a deed be enrol in court b Br monst de faits b  one can plead it in the same court without show it vide h b e b h record Br  but if a deed be plead and show in court c   light b c and deny then it shall  remain in court for ever for if it shall be find not in his deed it shall be d    b d damned c the bind ought to be keep in court but ought not to he cancel  because the judgement may be reverse by writ of error fitch v well salk in  Guilliams v Hulie side the court refuse to impound the deed c ass e  Fitzherbert monst de faits Br show de faits Br faits e h a b h f   b Br faits  f b h g   b Br faits Br obligate   b oyer of the writ Mod post b g b e a and  if a deed be deny in one court by coke a which it remain there this deed may  be h   light b h plead in another court without show it I Fitzherbert monst de  faits Br monst de faits Br faits I h a b e a send for for king   light a b  hard king law non think ad impossible d for when it be or be not necessary to  make profert Vid dr Leyfields case   a and note ib d note a good case in e a  where the case be that a l Statham waste Fitzherbert brief Fitzherbert show de  faits   light a b a l feme sole make a lease for life the lessee commit waste  the husband release and deliver the deed to a d person to be deliver to the  defendant on certain condition to be perform the defendant perform the  condition the husband get the release and detain it from the lessee and be and  his wife bring a action of waste the lessee on this special matter shall plead  it without show of it forth vide e a if husband and wife be implead in a real  action where the coke report a er p default of the wife be the default of both  if the demandant take the wife of the tenant from he it shall not turn the  tenant to a default so in dower detinue of charter c by the demandant it be a  good plea h tenant by statutemerchant or staple c shall not show the deed for  be come to the possession of the land by process of m   b Cr car Cr James    light b m law against the will of he who have the deed and have no mean to  come to it otherwise of a lease for life or year c because he come in by the  lessor and may have take a covenant or other security for his peaceable enjoy  of the land let to he and in case when the deed be deny n   light b n the law  which have appoint the deed to remain in court have also appoint a officer to  have the custody of it and that be the custos a f n b l   light b a narrow  places as appear in f n b l it be resolve that the course of the king bench be  that although the plaintiff after the bar plead have day to reply two or three  term after no mention shall be make in the roll of any imparlance or  continuance but when be reply the entry shall be ut above et prd Abel to say  quod ipse per aliquan per Self Williel sum periusplacit ab action svan prcludi  non debet c but otherwise it be of a bar there for that contain the imparlance  or continuance and be in such form et modus ad haec diem sure diem loveliness  c thither eoden boundary usque who diem prd William to have freedom  interloquend but no such entry be make on any replication rejoinder c by which  it shall be intend when they be general enter on record that they be make in  the same term in which the bar c be plead and by consequence the plaintiff in  the case at bar may take advantage of the condition comDrised in the deed show  forth by the defendant e Vid sergeant williams note mellar v walker sand e e