chancery report green contra rook car f devise to father for life remainder to  the first son c remainder to trustee for year to support the remainder it be a  good term to support the remainder notwithstanding the same be limit and  insert after the limitation to the first son it be in the case of a will that  Laurence rook father to the defendant Heyman rook and to the plaintiff mary be  seize in fee or feetail or other estate of land by deed of the that of Aug  grant the premise to Edward Scott and other for eighty year if he so long live  and afterward convey the same on the that of the same month unto sir Henry  Heyman and Peter Heyman and their heir for the term of his life and by deed  the that of October then next follow and by a recovery in pursuance thereof  the say premise be settle on the say sir Henry and Peter Heyman and their heir  for the life of the say Laurence remainder as to part to the use of Barbary  wife of the say Laurence for her life for a jointure and after as to part to  the say sir Henry and Peter Heyman for ninetynine year in trust to raise pound  for the portion of the old daughter of the say Laurence and then to the use of  the first son of the say Laurence in tail male with the remainder over that  the say Laurence and Barbara be dead and the defendant Heyman rook be his  first son and the plaintiff mary be his old daughter and chancery report the  portion of pound be due to her and the same be unpay Peter Heyman the survive  trustee assign the term of ninetynine year to the plaintiff green to enable he  to raise the money and the defendant Heyman rook bath mortgage the same  premise to the other defendant so the question be who have the right or equity  of redemption and the bill be also to have the plaintiff mary portion pay or  the equity of redemption foreclose the defendant Heyman rook by plea insist  that George rook his grandfather by will in devise the premise unto Laurence  rook his old son and father to the defendant Heyman rook for life only  remainder to the first second three and four son of the say Laurence in tail  remainder to John brown and other for their life in trust for the better  secure and preservation of the several remainder limit unto the several son of  the say Laurence rook with chancery report er p remainder over that the say  George rook die without revoke or alter the say use limit in his will and so  Laurence rook can not by the say deed or recovery bar or cut off the remainder  limit in and by the say will in regard the say brown and the chancery report  other trustee for preserve of the contingent remainder be live since in which  year the term of ninetynine year be create this court declare that the term  limit to the trustee in the win for their life for the preservation of the  contingent remainder to the several son of the say Laurence rook be a good  term and a state to support the say contingent remainder notwithstanding the  same be limit to the say trustee and insert in the say will after the  limitation to the first and other son of Laurence rook in tail male for the  same be in the will and the intent of the testator plain appear so in the will  they hold the say plea and demurrer to be good and so dismiss the plaintiff  bill