Barnardiston king b the parish OF NORTHFETHERTON against the parish OF  Horsington how far a order of removal shall be say to be conclusive to all the  world on rule to show cause why a order make by two justice for the removal of  one John powen mary his wife and three child to the parish of Northfetherton  which be affirm at the session shall not be quash and why a order of session  discharge a order of two justice make afterward for the remove the say mary by  the name of mary Hellior and four child as be bastard child to the parish of  Horsington where they be bear shall not be likewise quash and the say last  order of two justice confirm Mr fortescue say that he apprehend the law be  very clear that wherever a order of two justice be make for a removal and that  order not appeal from at the next quartersession or affirm upon the appeal  that removal be conclusive to all the world now he observe that there be such  a order in the present case for a removal to the parish of Northfetherton  which be actual affirm at the session and therefore he submit it that the  subsequent order of two justice be clear irregular Mr reeves on the other side  argue and say he shall not contend but the rule of law be as have be mention  neither shall he contend but the fact real be that the same woman with three  of the same child be send to the last parish of Horsington but he say upon  state the whole of the case it will appear that the parish of Horsington be  the parish which ought to be charge with these person and therefore if the  merit can in any way be come at the court will certain allow it the whole of  the case he observe be that this mary Hellior be indeed marry to this John  powen but he be at that very time marry to another woman and consequent the  marriage with mary Hellior be a mere nullity the child be bastard and  therefore mary Hellior and her child in conscience ought to be maintain by the  parish of Horsington which be the place where her settlement be and the place  where the child be bear now the way in which this order of removal to  Horsington may be make good he apprehend be by consider that the person remove  by the name of mary powen and the person remove by the name of mary Hellior  can not upon these order be take to be the same person the court doubt whether  this last order can be maintain in the manner that have be mention but if it  can in any way they say it certain shall upon this judge probin take two  exception to the order of removal to Northfetherton first that the order be  only say to be make upon due examination and other circumstance second that  the age of the child be not mention in it accord judge lee absent this matter  be order to stand over vide post