Brownlow goldsborough aylet versus Chippin mich James the plaintiff declare  upon a lease make by John aylet for one year of certain land in c in the  county of e by virtue whereof he enter and be possess until the defendant do  eject he the defendant plead that the copyhold land be parcel of the manor of  d c of which one Jo aylet the lessors father be seize in fee accord to the  custom and that he make a surrender thereof to the use of his will and by his  will devise the land in question to John the lessor and h aylet his son and to  their heir male of their body and will that they shall not enter until their  several age of year and further will that W b and h b his executor shall have  the land to perform his will until his son Jo and h come to their several age  of one and twenty year c to which plea the plaintiff reply and confess the  will but show further how that such a day and year before the lease Jo his  lessor attain to his full age of one and twenty year and enter and make a  lease thereof to he c to which plea the defendant demurrer and adjudge for the  plaintiff for although the estate to do and et precede in word and the devise  to the executor ensue in construction Brownlow goldsborough er p yet the  estate to Jo executor precede in possession and be as if he shall have demise  the land until his son Jo and h shall attain to their several age of one and  twenty year and afterward to they and their heir male c to be enjoy in  possession at their several age so that the executor have only a limit estate  determinable in time when either son several shall attain to his full age for  his part for so it appear the devisor intent be that either son may enter when  he attain to the age of one and twenty year and although it be object by  justice William that the two brother be joint tenant by the will and if one  shall enter when he come to his full age the other brother be under age that  will destroy the intent of the devise for then they shall not take joint but  the court as to that say that the entry of he that attain to his full age do  not destroy the juncture but that they be jointtenants notwithstanding for  that entry in the intent of the devisor be only as to the take of the profit  and the possession and not as to the estate in jointtenancy and this be prove  by h devise where a devise be to four in fee and that one of they shall have  all during his life and this be adjudge good and it be as to the take of the  profit only which observe by the whole court but William rice v Harviston  BrownIow and goldsborough er rice versus Harvislon pasch James the plaintiff  declare of a lease make by Jo bull c the defendant plead that the Brownlow  goldsborough land be copyholdland parcel of the manor of c whereof the king be  seize and be seize and that the king by his steward such a day grant the land  in question to he in fee to hold at will accord to the custom of the manor by  virtue whereof he be admit and enter and be seize until the lessor enter upon  he and oust he and make a lease to the plaintiff and then he enter and do  eject he c the plaintiff reply that long before the king have any thing in the  manor queen Elizabeth be thereof seize in fee in right of her crown and before  the ejectment suppose by the defendant by her steward at such a court do grant  the land in question by copy to duplicate in fee to hold at will accord to the  custom of the manor who be admit and enter and further show the descent of the  manor to the king and how the lessor enter and make a lease to the plaintiff  who enter and be thereof possess until the defendant do eject he upon which  plea the defendant do demurrer because he suppose that the plaintiff ought to  traverse the grant allege by the copy of the defendant in his bar but the  court hold the replication good for the plaintiff have confess and avoid the  defendant by a former copy grant by queen Elizabeth under who the king that  now be claim and so the plaintiff need not traverse the grant to the defendant  but such a traverse will make the plea vicious for which see Hilliaiss case  Rep and h Dolkniss case e dyer and brook title confess and avoid for as no man  can have a lease for year without assignment no more can a man have a copy  without grant make in court which observe