case Manaton versus Manaton Lord Macclesfield Eq can ab pl one seize in fee  and indebt by bind in which his heir be bind devise his land to a for life  remainder to his first c son entail remainder over in a bill bring by the  bondcreditors the court will not decree the devisee for life to account for  the profit but only to keep down the interest also the court will decree a  sale to satisfy the bind though the land be not devise for payment of debt one  seize of land in fee and be indebt to several person in bind in which his heir  be bind devise his land to a for life remainder to trustee during the peer  William er p life of a to preserve contingent remainder remainder to the first  c son of a in tail male successive remainder over with power to a the tenant  for life to make lease of the premise for one two or three life at the old  rend which be very small and conventional rend the land lie in the west of  England the devisee for life take the profit and raise considerable sum by  lease the premise out for life and by take of fine and have a son bear who be  now twentyone and the creditor by bind bring a bill for recover the money due  to they peer William the master of the roll decree saint a account of the  personal estate and then that the devise for life shall account for the rend  and profit of the real estate but the devisee for life appeal from this decree  and pray a sale Lord chancellor doubt whether there can be a sale decree there  be no devise of the land for the payment of debt and take time to consider of  it and at another day the cause be in the paper for judgement they who pray a  sale insist that the court have often decree a sale against the heir for the  payment of bind debt for that the land descend be asset and as such ought to  be sell and that it have be so decree in the case of Trevor and Trevor and  meller versus Edisbury that with respect to the money arise by the take of  fine these be temporary sale and though the tenant for life be not to account  for the profit nor do more than keep down the interest out of the profit yet  he shall account for all the fine which he have raise by lease Lord chancellor  it be sufficient that the devisee for life shall keep down the interest and  therefore the decree that he shall account for all the rend and profit of the  premise be not right as the testator in this case die seize of different kind  of peer William estate one usual let for life at conventionary rend and the  other at rackrents let the master first order the sale of the land lei at  rackrents and if those be not sufficient then so much be to be sell as be  requisite of the land grant out for life and on which the small rend be  reserve and in such case in regard the fine take by the devisee for life must  have lessen the sum for which such land will sell the devisee for life if any  of these land be sell must account for the fine which shall here be take as  part of the purchasemoney but if the sale of the land let at rackrent can  produce money sufficient for the payment of the debt then I take it that the  devisee for life shall not account for the fine which he have receive because  the devisee in remainder will have the same benefit of raise what money he can  by fine and so every one in his turn will enjoy the like liberty