coke b the earl OF Cumberland case mich James king e by letter patent grant  the castle and manor of S c to r c in tail king h grant to t c the reversion  of the say castle and manor of S c with the appurtenance and also the manor  and castle aforesaid hold admit the grant to r c be void the castle and manor  pass by the late grant to T U in feesimple in possession see Skinner lane in  the great case of the earl of Cumberland hear in the court of ware this term  before the earl of Salisbury master of the ware and livery with the assistance  of the two chief justice and chief baron for the castle and manor of Skipton  in craven c in the county of York it be hold by the two chief justice and  chief baron that where king e by his letter patent have grant the say castle  and manor of Skipton in craven c to Robert de Clifford in tail king h to go  away as it be find by office though lord Clifford cousin and heir of the body  of the say Robert de Clifford reversion prd castle et manor de Skipton in  craven c cum nest pertinent nor castrum manor prd that admit that the say  grant in tail to the say Robert de Clifford be void which be only put by way  of admittance without prejudice to any of the party that yet the say castle  and manor do pass by the late grant to Thomas Lord Clifford in feesimple in  possession for the intent of king h be that be it in possession or reversion  it shall pass and his word agree with his intent for first be grant the  reversion if the first estatetail be good and if the estatetail be not good  then he far grant the say manor in possession and so his word in his letter  patent agree with his intention and both agree with the law as many lease make  by the king and other his progenitor before he to one to begin after the  determination of such a lease if the lease be good and if the lease be not  good from such a feast and such lease be good note reader as to coke a the  recital of a estatetail or lease for life or year by these word mentionatur  before to go away or to send different ways c it be but of late and yet of  good invention but the ancient form be to recite the first grant and to grant  the reversion and far to grant the land in possession and these several coke  report b er p grant in a cart Mod salk l raym skin a a patent be as good and  strong in law as if the king by a patent have recite the estatetail and grant  the reversion and by another patent have grant the land in possession without  question the one or the other will be good so be it when the several grant be  contain in one and the same patent for b   b   light b Bulstr Nov roll Rep  hard b in vain fit per more quod become to be able per pauciora and the  opinion of c Plowd b c hussy CJ in h a b be good law if it be well understand  for non in to bring together send in to come to know law consistent for where  be say it be clear if the king intend to ratify and confirm a grant make by  his predecessor of a franchise by his letter patent and he ratify and confirm  the estate and further add this clause damns et to go away this be but a void  grant which ought to be thus intend that for fear of a forfeiture of the  franchise the patentee take a confirmation of the successor king which be  sufficient before office find of the forfeiture to discharge the patentee of  any forfeiture and therefore he well say that the subsequent word damns et to  go away be but void for the king in such case have not any estate grantable in  law before office find and therefore of necessity it ought to take effect by  way of confirmation and can enure by way of grant and all this appear by  Hussey reason express in the say book why fallow et to go away in such case be  void for as he say if it shall not pass by this confirmation and by grant then  it shall enure by way of confirmation and not by way of grant vide two e b h a  b blow Com but in the case at bar there be not any confirmation which  presuppose that the king have but a title or right not grantable but both  estate as well of the reversion as of the possession be grantable estate and  so not like the say case put by Hussey and when the king charter may be take  to d   a   a   b   a b Bulstr kelw a a side Leon roll r a b d two intent and  both intent be of effect and good in many case it shall be take to such intent  which be most beneficial for the king but if it may be take to one e before a    a   a b e intent of effect and good and to another intent void and of none  effect it shall be take and construe accord to such intent that the king grant  shall take effect and which in judgement of law stand with the king intent for  it be not the king intent to make a void grant and therewith agree the book in  a   a r   a   b keb dyer pl ig Br patent Br exempt Br expos Plowd a a b b  Fitzherbert grant more hard roll Rep side a e in the abbot of Walthams case  the reason and rule of which coke b book overrule the case now in question  sure either to make the grant good either of the reversion if the former grant  in tail be good or of the possession if the former grant be void or if no  grant be make entirely but not to make the king grant utter void as well of  the reversion as of the possession when the king have either the reversion or  the possession in he so it be hold if the king grant totum mock manor sive  strong de d or totan that rectorian sive legal support de d that if the king  have a manor or a farm and no manor or a rectory impropriate or ail advowson  and no rectory that which the king have shall pass for the effect of the grant  be be it a manor or farm rectory impropriate or advowson that which the king  in truth have shall pass a upon the subject of grant by the king Vid note r et  seq Alton wood case   a a coke report a er p