case sir Charles Howard against sir William cavendish and his wife Michaelmas  term James roll a sheriff`s return to a writ oft to have facias in dower that  he have make seize de to make one property sive of Firmum c be sufficient  certain error of a judgement give in dower and in execution thereof whereas  the demand be to be endow of the three part of the honour of Clun and of six  hundred message two thousand acre of land c in Clun and twentylhree other town  and of the advowson of Hoxsey and a recovery by default the to have facias  seisinam be award with a writ to esquire of the value for that the husband die  seize whereupon the sheriff return quod to have fecit seisinam de tertian part  of the honour hundredor tenementor croak throw et legal support videlicet de  to make one property sive of Firmum in Clun peremptory or urgent call Weston  Ferm tune well recently in occupation William unton c the error assign be that  it be uncertain for a tenement or farm be uncertain and therefore a ejectment  de messuagio sive property be ill a so all indictment that he enter into a  message or tenement be rule to be ill so in other place after it be de  messuagiis sive property cum terris meadow pasture et pastur eisd to stretch  out tunc well recently in tenure well occupation of I S and twelve other  tenant by copy which be allege to be uncertain for the cause aforesaid and  then be ill in this point and damage find for all it be ill c Houghton justice  incline to that opinion but all the other justice hold it to be well enough in  assignment of dower because it be but the return of the sheriff and needs not  such precise certainty as in declaration or indictment and therefore it be say  by lea chief justice that messuagium sive property in tenur I S be good and  usual and it will be infinite to set down here every of they by itself but  when he say in the end that he have deliver they all by meet and bind it  suffice vide old bk of Ent and new bk of Ent it be also move at the bar that  the judgement be good as be confess and the writ of seize well award there be  not error in the court in award execution and no error can be assign in the  sheriff act in give the seize and return thereof Doderidge be of that opinion  unless it be as this case be where damage be to be inquire and judgement for  they so as if for any of they it be ill then the recovery of the damage be  entire it be ill for all a second error assign be because the sheriff have  give the three part of the advowson et good et catalla felon which be  franchise whereof she be not dowable say non allocatur for they hold that the  return be good for of a advowson if it be in gross or appendant she be dowable  vide Edward dower Edward ibidem Edward ibidem Edward ibidem and of franchise  parcel of the honour of Clun may be well assign and they may be parcel and  appendant to the honour although they be not belong to a manor which be of a  inferior nature wherefore the judgement and execution be affirm