case Hancock against Hancock bind fraudulent obtain S c Eq Abr Hancock have  issue two son the one marry a daughter of Dolswell the other be the young have  make his address to a lady and all thing be adjust and conclude upon for the  wedding Dolswell take the young gentleman aside show he a bind ready draw  which as he say be prepare by the direction of his father and tell he that  unless he will execute it his father will not suffer the match to proceed and  moreover that he must not so much as mention anything relate to this bind as  he value his father displeasure the condition of this bind be that if he shall  die without issue by that marriage he will leave three thousand pound to one  or more of the child of the elder brother who have marry this daughter of  Dolswell the young gentleman under this terror execute the bind afterward he  speak to his father of it who deny that he ever give such direction and give  he three thousand pound to indemnify he against the bind which three thousand  pound be when this bind shall be deliver up to he to be distribute among the  grandchild the father die the second son in his lifetime and by his will give  modern report in land and money more than three thousand pound to one of the  child of his elder brother and die without issue the only evidence of the  manner by which this bind be extort be a recital in the will of the second son  it be prove in the cause that when the young brother be make these gift in  favour of his elder brother son he be advice to declare that this be in  satisfaction of the bind but his answer be that this will look like comply  with a bind which he have all along declare have be unjust extort from he this  bind be of fifty year stand Parker Lord chancellor I make no doubt but this  bind be fraudulent extort but I know not how to come at it for to allow a  recital in the will of the obligor as evidence to overthrow a bind may be a  thing of dangerous consequence however I think the bind have be satisfy and  the reason give why he will not declare it to be in satisfaction do very plain  amount to a declaration of his intention that he do not design to make the  gift he do over and above the satisfy his bind modern report er p trinity term  the five of George the first in the king bench sir John Pratt Knt chief  justice sir Littleton powys Knt sir Robert Eyre Knt sir John fortescue aland  Knt justice Nicholas Lechmere Esq attorneygeneral sir William Thompson Knt  solicitor general