case stanley against Lennard saint may see Allgood v black l r ex devise to S  for life remainder to his old son and his issue male and for want of issue of  S to c S die without issue and hold he take a estate tail in remainder like  Langley v Baldwin p wms note Eq can Abr S lib Reg b foe nom Stanley v Burrel S  c Eden hill ms vol p more full sir Samuel Lennard have no legitimate issue but  two natural child by will that November devise his estate to trustee upon the  trust follow and take notice that he have two son who he cause to be baptise  by the name of Samuel and Thomas he direct his trustee after payment of his  debt and legacy to permit and suffer Samuel the old of his say child to  receive the rend and profit for life and after his death to permit the old son  of the say Samuel and his issue male to receive the rend and for want of issue  of the say Samuel to permit Thomas to receive the rend for life and after his  death to permit the old son of Thomas to receive the same and the heir male of  his body and for want of issue of both his say child or if their issue shall  die without issue then to permit his sister Dorothy Lennard to receive the  rend for life with remainder to her first son in tail male he and they take  the name of Lennard and for want of such issue to permit his nephew Francis  leigh to receive c for life remainder to his second son that shall be live at  the time of the beforementioned contingency in tail male remainder to his  nephew next son which be not his heir he or they take upon they the surname of  Lennard and for want of issue to his own right heir for ever and after give  several legacy he direct that his old son shall have the use of all his  picture for life and if he have any issue at his death he will that such issue  and the issue of such issue shall have the use of they for their several life  ambler er p but if he and his issue die without issue he will that his son  Thomas shall have the use of they if ambler he have none then he will that  they shall go to his sister and her issue in manner as his estate be above  direct and he will that pound ayear be lie out by his executor in keep up the  garden testator die rd October Thomas Lennard Dorothy Lennard and Francis  leigh die without issue in the lifetime of Samuel Samuel die in leave the  defendant Sarah his daughter and only child bill by plaintiff as heir at law  to the testator for a account of the rend and profit from the death of Samuel  and to have a conveyance of the estate from the trustee Q whether Samuel  Lennard be entitle to a estate tail and that depend on the question whether  Samuel by virtue of the word for want of issue take a estate tail by  implication for the plaintiff it as argue that the manifest intent of the  testator be that his estate shall go in the male line of succession and that  by the old son of Samuel he mean the old as they shall be in succession and  that the word for want of issue of Samuel ought to be construe for want of  such issue or for want of issue male on the other side it be argue that those  word ought to be construe for want of issue general the prior limitation be  only to the old son of Samuel and the case of Langley v Baldwin and  attorneygeneral v Payman p wms be cite as authority in point and Lord keeper  be of that opinion bill dismiss