case godfrey versus watson march it come before the court on exception to a  master report where a creditor by judgement extend land by elegit he hold  until what time debt is owed be satisfied to be and at law the debtor can on a  writ ad to sum up insist on the creditor do more than account for the extend  value but if the debtor come here for relief the court will give it he by  oblige the creditor to account for the whole lie have receive but as he who  come for equity must do equity will direct the debtor to pay interest to the  creditor though it shall exceed the principal a creditor be not confine to the  extent of the penalty upon a judgement but may carry the computation of  interest beyond it the first exception be for not allow the sum of three  hundred eighty one pound be the surplus interest beyond the penalty of a  judgement this do not appear in Reg lib a fol it be say by the plaintiff  counsel that the creditor be entitle only to the extent of the penalty upon a  judgement and that he can carry the interest no further Lord chancellor at law  upon a judgement enter up it be the debt is owed regain and the state damage  between the party but if the creditor do not take out a become facias against  the person of the debtor or his personal estate but extend the land by elegit  which the sheriff do only at the annual value and much below the real the  creditor hold until what time debt is owed be satisfied to be and at law the  debtor can upon a writ ad to sum up insist upon the creditor do more than  account for the extend value but if the debtor come in to a court of equity  for relief this court will give it he by oblige the creditor to account atkins  for the whole that he have receive and as a person who come for equity must do  equity will direct the debtor to pay interest to the creditor even though it  shall exceed the principal send vide Bromley v goodere atk and I remember very  well upon sergeant whitaker insist before Lord chancellor Cowper that this  will be repeal the statute of Westminster his lordship say he will not repeal  the statute but he will do complete justice by let the creditor carry on the  interest upon his debt as he be to account for the whole he have receive and  the same rule prevail in this court where a mortgagee have tack a judgement in  a good condition and fit to be repair atkins er p to his mortgage he shall not  be confine to the penalty of the judgement but shall be entitle to interest  upon the debt secure b judgement though it exceed the penalty down to the time  the principal be pay off and therefore his lordship allow the defendant  exception Lord chancellor say that a mortgagee in possession be not oblige to  lie out money any further than to keep the estate in necessary repair but if a  mortgagee have expend any sum of money in support the right of the mortgagor  to the estate where his title have be impeach the mortgagee may certain add  this to the principal of his debt and it shall carry interest he also say a  mortgagee shall not be allow for his trouble in receive the rend of the estate  himself Bonithon v Hockmore vern French v baron atk but if a estate lie at  such a distance from the place of his residence as he must have employ a  bailiff if it have be his own he shall then be allow such sum as he have pay  to a bailiff to receive the rend of this estate