case marsh and his wife a executor may bring a writ of error to reverse the  outlawry for felony of his testator post roll Abr   a Mod Owen Leon than ab  godb salk hawk marsh and his wife as executrix to Wilkenson bring a writ of  error to reverse a outlawry of felon against the testator the error assign be  that the exigent issue to London and the sheriff return quod ex gi fecer de  county in county whereas it ought to be de hustingo in hustingum for they have  no county and for this cause it be hold a manifest error but the principal  question be if error lie by a executor to reverse a attainder of felony in the  testator?Coke and Popham attorneygeneral allege that it can be maintain by a  executor first because a person attaint can have executor second executor can  have error but to reverse a judgement inthe personalty but her the judgement  be more high for it be in the realty and it may be mischievous for the  executor may pursue faint and so the judgement may he affirm and bind the heir  three upon a writ of error to reverse a attainder in felony a to know facias  ought to be to warn the lord mediate and immediate which can be at the suit of  a executor gawdy conceive the action do well lie for executor be privy to the  judgement and peradveriture have all the loss for it may be that he that be  outlaw ad only good and no land and as to the disability allege that the  testator be attaint and so have no good nor can make a executor it be not  material in this suit wherethey be to reverse the attainder which do disable  they as Henry pl but it do not appear by that book that he be outlaw for  felony and as to the faint pursue of the action the heir and executor by  reason of their several interest may have several writ of error as the tenant  and vouchee may and as to the to know facias this needs not he in respect of  the good which be intend to he in the queen hand who be always present in  court and it be to he well consider if it may be against the lord but the  clerk say a scirefaciag have been award against the lord Wray the disability  allege be not to he object against the executor the suit be to reverse it and  the case be to he well consider for it may be very mischievous against the  lord el adjournatur see the continuation of this case post