black versus or blacket versus lumley keb Q side raym error of a judgement in  replevin in the manorcourt of hexam in Northumberland where the defendant avow  for damagefeasant the plaintiff reply that I S be seize of the manor of  Tallowfield in d and that time out of mind he have common c in the place where  and show himself to be tenant and justify the put in of his beast for common  and the prescription be traverse it be find for the avowant the error assign  be first in the venire which be because nee the plaintiff nee the defendant  aliquan relation by marriage moisten instead of because nee hale say it be aid  by the statute of h that help error in process but Twisden say that statute do  not extend to inferior court another error insist on be that the avowant do  not show that the manor of Tallowfield be infra jurisdiction curiae but the  venire be extra will manor de Tallowfield infra jurisdiction curiae but the  court hold that that be not sufficient to intimate that it be within the  jurisdiction but must have be show in plead and hale say see the plaintiff  have omit to do it the avowant may in his rejoinder have allege Tallowfield to  have be within the jurisdiction as where one plead a plea without a place the  other be not bind to Ventris demurrer but for his expedition may show the  place in his replication then wile say this seem to be aid by the statute of  James which enact that if the jury come out of any one of the place it suffice  and here the jury come as well out of the will where the beast be take show to  be within the jurisdiction as the manor of Tallowfield hale that will not  serve in this case for the court can not award a venire to a place out of the  jurisdiction nor juror can not be return out of such a place to try a cause  there another error assign be that the award of the venire be teaching be per  seneschallum and not say in eaden curian to which it be answer that be on the  same day upon which the court be say to be hold it must be intend so wile hold  the judgement ought to be reverse for the last cause Twisden principal for the  first for he hold that the statute of h aid not process in inferior court  therefore where in the award of the venire it have be per quos rei veritas  melius to know to be able instead of to know the judgement have be reverse  hale say that it ought to be to know for so it be in the register and in the  statute Ventris er p of Elizabeth that set the estate of juror at l per annum  but for the second error be hold that the judgement ought be reverse