between the parish OF BURCLEAR and EASTWOODHAY descent of a copyhold to a  certificateman give he a settlement case of Sett and Rem p No Mod S c on a  special order of session the case be state for the opinion of the court that  Abraham hatchett be legal settle in the parish of Burclear about year since  marry and have four daughter about eight year since he come with his wife and  child into Eastwoodhay as a certificateman while they be there a copyhold of l  quaere if it shall not be S vide burr SC and the several report of this case  per annum descend to his wife which they enjoy for five year till her death  and then accord to the custom of the manor it descend the copyhold come to the  wife not by descent but by the surrender of her father vide king v Deddington  burr SC notorious facts post and Cas of Sett and Rem pl to the old daughter  about half a year ago the man ask relief in Eastwoodhay and thereupon the  session send he back to Burclear before they take up the case upon the special  state of it a objection be make to the order of the two justice that strange  they only adjudge he likely to become Chargeable whereas a certificateman be  not removable till he become actual so and though the order of session state  that he ask relief of the parish yet one order shall not be make good by  another no more than it can by matter allege in the return to which it be  answer that if the order of two justice be to stand by itself then it will be  well enough for it be a general order of removal wherein no notice be take of  his be a certificateman and therefore likely be sufficient beside that order  be entire out of the case for the special matter be refer to the court they be  to judge upon that only quod to be concession per curian then it be move to  quash the special order because though the man come into Eastwoodhay with a  certificate yet the enjoyment of the copyhold for five year during which time  he be not removable have gain he a settlement there on the other side it be  say that the W c have provide that a certificateman shall not gain a  settlement unless he take l per annum or serve a parish office and that be a  explanatory Act which be not to be explain therefore this man not come within  either of those case be notwithstanding the descent of the copyhold to his  wife removable upon his become a charge to the parish et per curian this be  not a explanatory but a new law and must therefore receive a liberal  construction the exception in the statute prove this case be a case more  reasonable than either that be there mention if a certificate man by take l  per annum gain a settlement a strong shall he that have a estate of his own  especial in this case where he do not come to it by act of his own which may  savour of fraud but it be cast upon he by the act and operation of law if he  that serve a parish office gain a settlement upon account of his presume  ability with great reason shall he that have ability of his own visible to all  the world it have be already adjudge that any other person by the descent or  purchase of a freehold or copyhold or by become entitle to a lease for year  gain a settlement and it can be suppose the parliament intend to put a  certificateman in a worse condition the value of the copyhold be not material  for it be its be his own make he not removable a man must take a tenement of l  per annum to gain a settlement but yet he may come to settle upon a tenement  of his own though of ever so small a value this man therefore be for five year  irremovable from Eastwoodhay have gain a good settlement there and the order  to remove he from thence must be quash strange report er p