Blackhall against Thursby one Blackhall petition in the court of request to  compel Thursby lord of the manor to admit he to a copyhold surrender to his  use which he refuse before to do and also forhad one to who the copyhold be  demifed by blackball to pay he any rend upon which it be decree that Thursby  shall admit he to a message and acre whereas the copy be of a message and acre  and also that Thursby shall set forth the bind of the copyhold which he have  deface and remove and that be pay the rend Hitcham move for a prohibition for  he say it be more just for a court of equity to compel a lord to admit his  copyholder for before admittance he can have a action and he have no remedy at  the commonlaw and so if a copyholder remove or deface the bind of the copyhold  it be proper for such a court to design they to which the court agree but they  will not compel he to admit he to the message and acre where the copy be but  of three acre which will be unjust unless that the will comprehend the other  but parcel or not parcel of copyhold belong to the commonlaw to try but the  court deny the prohibition for that cause for the justice say that that  admittance to acre do not bind the title but it set at liberty as to that but  if they have decree that he shall be admit and also enjoy it to he and his  heir then the decree have be unjust and a prohibition for that but for part of  the decree which touch the rend it be agree by the court if Thursby receive  the rend the decree be just that he shall pay it but if he do not receive the  rend nor take the profit but only forhad the tenant to pay the rend and he  will save he harmless then if it be decree that he shall pay the rend a  prohibition to that part shall be grant and Harvey justice in that case say  that he know it to be adjudge that a surrender with the appurtenance will pass  land and of a message and acre will pass more acre if diverse copy successive  have be so and upon question of blackball by the chief justice for say that  after there be a decree in the court of equity a order of the CommonBench can  not supersede the execution of it and justice Yelverton declare that when he  be in the circuit at York a poor man who sue before he in form poor man be  arrest by process from the council of York and that upon notice of it he  command a writ of privilege to be make for he but the officer of the council  will not obey it upon which he clap in a habeas corpus returnable at a certain  hour and the officer come without the body and refuse to deliver the prisoner  and say that he have not power to control the process of the council and upon  that he set a fine upon he of and his Act hetley be approve on by the whole  court for every one that sue before the assize ought to have free egress and  regress and stay while his business be end and afterward the Lord precedent  say to Yelverton that he will complain to the king and privycouncil of he for  that he have transgress his authority and power and the court say that they  will justify it c