case cook v martin pray general relief in a bill be sufficient admission of  asset to one admission to all where general relief be pray in one part and  particular in another the bill must stand over to be amend on the that of  September John martin make his will in which he say I give all my SouthSea  bind c in trust that my executrix shall pay unto my son John martin the sum of  fifty pound per annum and then give a legacy of pound to a niece and several  other pecuniary legacy all which I direct to be pay within six month after my  wife shall have make a final end of a affair depend with relation to a  particular estate and give all the residue of his estate to his wife and make  her sole executrix the question upon this will be whether these be specific or  general legacy Mr attorney general counsel for the executrix argue that if  there be a sufficient fund the legatee be entitle to payment and if not  sufficient so far as it go for if a particular fund fall short a specific  legatee must abate in proportion with other legatee and not be reimburse out  of the general asset atkins the executrix in her answer to a bill bring by one  of the specific legatee allow the fund be sufficient to satisfy the specific  legacy but can not set forth what be the exact amount of the SouthSea bind c  it appear in proof that the legacy come to pound over and above the fifty  pound per and and the SouthSea bind c amount to pound principal Lord  chancellor as the fund prove insufficient to pay the legacy be it not the same  case as if the testator have say I give such a sum out of a estate I be  entitle to but if the particular estate fall short of his expectation will any  body say they shall not be pay out of the general asset see purse v Snaplin  ante vol the payment within six month be no more than a direction for the  payment of the specific legacy and do not make any alteration as to the fund  the executrix by her answer confess that she have Southsea bind Southsea  annuity and other asset sufficient to satisfy all the legacy which be put the  same construction as be now contend for by the plaintiff and though no  confession of law can possible hurt the party unless the fact be right yet it  will be absurd as the very fund the testator have then in contemplation be not  equal to satisfy the legacy and annuity if I be not to extend they to the  other part of the personal estate especial where there be a residue allow see  ante vol by the executrix in her answer after all debt and legacy be satisfy  pray general relief be sufficient though the plaintiff shall not be more  explicit in the j prayer of the bill and Mr robin a very eminent counsel use  to say general relief be the best prayer next to the lord prayer see post  Grimes v finch the admission of asset by the executrix to one legatee be a  admission to all but as in this case general relief be pray in one part of the  bill and particular relief in another it must stand over to be amend upon pay  the cost of the day atkins er p