Barnardiston king b the king and uvellen the manner of execute process within  the liberty of Dover a rule have be grant for a attachment against the  defendant as register of Dover for not bring in the body of a prisoner in  pursuance of a rule make upon he for that purpose after a return of to take in  hand corpus the attorney general now move that it may be discharge he say the  constable of Dover have both a military and civil jurisdiction and he be the  immediate officer to this court the constable have a lieutenant or deputy in  his military jurisdiction and a register or deputy in his civil he have  likewise a court of admiralty and equity and the register have the keep of the  seal which be fix to all sort of process the register likewise make out  warrant for execute this process and likewise make out the return but he say  the register have no power over the body of the prisoner the boder or marshal  have the custody of they so that at most the register can be consider but in  part deputy to the constable in his civil jurisdiction the boder be deputy to  he in the other part of it for which reason he submit it this case be by no  mean like that of a sheriff and undersheriff for there the undersheriff have  the whole of the sheriff authority and such deputation can be divide the  consequence of which he say be that the rule be not right make upon the  register to bring in the body and therefore he hope the Barnardiston king b er  p rule for the attachment shall be discharge but the court say the boder do  not seem to be a proper person to make this rule upon because he be only in  the nature of a gaoler and against the constable they will not grant this  attachment because though they may do it yet as he be the principal officer  they always do grant they in such case against his deputy they do agree that  in all these case the rule be make upon the principal officer for do the act  and so it be in the case of a sheriff but yet there be a clause in the rule  that service upon the inferior officer shall be good service the question then  to be consider be whether the register in this case be to be look upon as the  inferior officer they say he make out warrant to execute all process that be  direct to he he make out the return to all such process and therefore they  think he be sufficient within the description of a inferior officer and judge  page say he think the acceptance of the seal from the constable make he a  sufficient deputy however the court say if they have not so much reason for  grant the attachment against he yet as he omit to show this matter upon the  rule that be make on he for show cause why he shall not bring in the body they  say they will certain grant the attachment against he accord the court refuse  discharge the rule but upon the defendant consent to go before the master they  order it to lie in the officer hand for a week