barker versus ringrose word thou art a bankrupt rogue Barker bring a action  upon the case against ringrose and declare that whereas he be of good fame and  exercise the trade of a woolwinder the defendant speak these scandalous word  of he that he be a bankrupt rogue and it be move in arrest of judgement that  those word be not actionable for the word themselves be not actionable but as  they concern a office or trade c and it appear by the statute of e that a  woolwinder be not any trade but be but in the nature of a porter so that the  plaintiff be not defame in his function because be have not any also it be not  aver that he be a woolwinder at the time of the word speak Jones justice if  one say of a woolwinder that he be a false woolwinder action upon the case lie  and it be demand by the court what a woolwinder be and it be answer that in  the country he be take to be a woolwinder that make up the fleece and take the  dirt out of it and a woolwinder in London open the fleece and make they more  curious up and in London they belong to the main of the staple Popham  Doderidge if one say of a sherman that he be a bankrupt action lie and so it  have be adjudge of a shoemaker and note that if one say of any man who by his  trade may become a bankrupt within the statute that he be a bankrupt a action  lie as of a tailor full c and the court seem to incline that in this case be  speak of a woolwinder in London the action lie but mich car the case be move  again the court be of opinion that the action can not lie and will not give  judgement for the plaintiff the same term in the same court outlawry reverse  upon reversal of the principal judgement notam by Doderidge and Jones justice  that upon the principal judgement reverse the outlawry be also Self facto  reverse also if a outlawry be award if it be not per judgment coronator unless  it be in London the outlawry be void it be demand by the justice when the  outlawry and judgement be affirm how the entry be and it be answer by broom  secondary that the entry be general quod judgment affirme in omnibus and this  suffice but if the judgement be affirm and the outlawry reverse then the entry  be quod judgment affirme utlagario empty the same term in the same court