case MACAREE against tall at the roll that Aug one devise to I m all his  freehold copyhold and leasehold estate in Essex and give the rest of his  estate both freehold and leasehold to m f he have freehold and leasehold in  Middlesex but no copyhold out of Essex hold I m take the fee in the freehold  and copyhold and the absolute property air the leasehold in Essex lib Reg b  foe a Wheeler v Walroone alein John tall by his will d September give to his  cousin John Macaree all his freehold copyhold and leasehold estate in the  county of Essex and give and bequeathe all the rest and residue of his estate  both freehold and leasehold to mary fournee on hear it be refer to the alaster  to inquire if the testator have any other freehold and leasehold estate any  freehold and copyhold land l r than what be in ambler Essex and it be report  that he have a freehold estate in Middlesex of ayear and it appear from the  defendant answer that he have also a small leasehold in Middlesex question if  Macaree take a fee in the freehold and copyhold estate and all the leasehold  estate in Essex master of the roll after argument in case of a will the  intention be first to be consider and that by two way saint as appear on the  face of the will dly from circumstance the testator have mention the different  species of estate which he have in Essex videlicet freehold copyhold and  leasehold in the devise to Macaree and in the residuary clause he leaves out  copyhold because he have none out of Essex and use the word freehold and  leasehold cause he have those sort in Middlesex there be no doubt that the  word estate in a will without other word or around ambler er p stances to  restrain the generality of the sense will carry a fee countess of Bridgewater  v duke of Bolton in salk in Barry v Edgeworth p W the word in Upper Catesby be  as strong as the word in the present case in ibbetson v Beckwith king t Talb  testator introduce his will by declare his intention to dispose of all his  estate and lie require the devisee to change his name so that case be not  quite applicable but Lord Talbot consider the word estate as carry the  interest in it Tuffnell v page burn atk S c hark ms be very strong I give all  my estate in kerby hall to a and hold it pass the fee ambler it be doubtful on  the first clause and I do not give my opinion on that sole but on the whole  case and circumstance in the first clause the testator give such species of  estate as he have in Essex by the residuary clause he describe such as he have  out of Essex upon that I find myself the quantity of estate in Middlesex be  not material if there be any it satisfy the will decree accord that deed and  write relate to the freehold copy hold and leasehold estate in Essex be  deliver to plaintiff Bailis v gale Ves Chorlton v tailor v b Pettiwood v  Prescott Ves roe v wright east see do v Clayton east do v Langland east see  Goodwin v Goodwin Ves barn v patch Ves Woollan v Kenworthy Ves do v Hurrell b  a do v Gilbert Brod b the decree declare the plaintiff entitle to a feesimple  in all the say testator freehold and copyhold land in the county of Essex and  also to all the testator leasehold estate in the say county see tanner v wise  can tempt Talb S c p wms Ridout v pain atk goodwyne v goodwyne Ves Bailis v  gale Ves Loveacres v blight Cowp den v gaskin ib price v Gibson Eden do v  Allen t r Petteward v Prescott Ves barn v patch Ves Woollan v Kenworthy Ves  Charlton v tailor v b do v Clayton east do v Hurrel d a do v Gilbert bro bing  do v Langlands east Patton v Randall I W