case gregory versus Molesworth march approve Soorjomonee dayee v Suddanund  Mohapatter lr ind App sup Vol Tekait doorga Persad Singh v Tekaitni doorga  Konwari lr ind App a infant be bind by a decree in a cause where he be  plaintiff as much as a person of full age Lord brook v Lord Hertford p W a  plea of a former decree sign and enrol be plead to a new bill for the same  matter Mr attorney general in support of the plea insist that a infant be bind  by a decree in the cause when she be plaintiff as much as a person of full age  and be so determine between the duchess of Buckingham versus Sheffield before  Lord Hardwicke atk Lord chancellor this be a plain case for it will be very  mischievous if a new bill be allow to be bring by the plaintiff here this be a  plea of a former decree make in a cause relevant to the same matter with the  present bill the question will be first whether the decree be a determination  of the point between the party as to this it be improper for the court to give  a different judgement because there will be two contradictory judgement appear  on the same record the former decree be on a bill bring by the plaintiff wife  to have a account of her father personal estate and to have a five as her  share of it that bill charge the defendant pretend the legacy of Margaret  Molesworth be lapse this be the common and only way of bring on the question  by set forth the pretence of the defendant and therefore sufficient put the  poi t in issue the decree have direct a account to be take of the estate and  express that the Southsea stock shall be sell and one five part reserve for  the benefit of sir John Molesworth when he attain his age of twentyone atkins  er p atkins this be as full a determination against the plaintiff as if a  declaration on the point that the plaintiff be not entitle court of equity no  more than court of law be not oblige to give reason for their judgement if a  man in a court of law bring his action for several demand and he have a  judgement for one only it be as much a judgement as if there have be a  particular determination upon each a decree can be alter only by bill of  review either for error on the face of the decree or for new matter not know  at the time of bring the first bill here she be of age during some of the  proceed in the cause but if she have continue a infant during all the time of  the proceed she be as much bind though a infant as a person of full age I know  but of one case that be a exception lady essingham versus sir John napper p W  where upon a appeal from Lord macclesfield decree with regard to real estate  the house of lord give sir John napper leave to show cause when he come of age  against his own decree but it will be most mischievous with regard to personal  estate if a infant after be of age be allow by a new bill to dispute any thing  that be do during his minority with regard to maintenance education c it be  right to follow the rule of law where it be hold a infant be as much bind by a  judgement in his own action as if of full age and this be general unless gross  laches or fraud and collusion appear in the prochein any then the infant may  open it by a new bill I can presume that improper proof be make in the former  cause but must take it for grant that proper one be give unless the enrolment  of the decree be open by bill of review and the plea to that bill disallow  there the court overrule the plea and then the cause be open again and can  proper come at it if error appear on the face of it gold v Tancred t atk but  as it stand now the plea must be allow