Barnardiston king b the king and the inhabitant OF GONERSALE the form which be  to be observe in order of removal Mr fazakerly move to quash several order of  justice of peace the first be in this form westriding in the county of York to  the churchwarden and overseer of Astwick in the say ride to remove and to the  churchwarden and overseer of Gonersale in the northriding to receive whereas  complaint have be make unto we two of his majesty justice of the peace quorum  One for the say ride by the churchwarden and overseer of Astwick in the say  ride c the exception take by he be that it no where appear that the complaint  be make to the justice of the westriding and as the complaint appear to have  be make by person of the westriding it ought to have appear that the justice  to who the complaint be make be likewise of that ride for the tide in  Yorkshire be take notice of in the law to be equal distinct as county but he  observe that accord to the rule of strict construction the justice appear to  have be of the northriding for the first word say ride in the second clause be  word of reference and consequent must relate to the last antecedent which be  the northriding Mr reeves on the other side answer that those word of  reference ought to relate to the word westriding in the margin but the court  be of opinion that the construction which Mr fazakerly put upon the word be  the proper construction and accord quash the order the objection then that he  take to the other of these order depend principal upon the time in which the  several order appear to have be make the order that have be speak of be make  on the eight of October which be for the removal of the wife and child only of  one Austin Stonan on the twentyeighth of April a order be make for the removal  of Austin Stonan himself single from Meldix to Astwick and upon a appeal this  order be confirm on the thirty of April and in pursuance of this order another  be make by two justice on the fourteenth of September for the removal of the  wife and child of this Stonan to the place where Stonan be last send  notwithstanding which three last order so make in pursuance one of the other  another have be make by two justice nine November which only recite the first  order and send the whole family to Gonersale accord now Mr fazakerly submit it  that this be irregular because the last order confirm Barnardiston king b er p  by the session be the order which these justice shall have abide by and though  at the time of make that order there be another order actual in force yet  consider how long a space of time there be between those two order it may just  be intend that from the time of the first order the party have acquire a  subsequent settlement but Mr reeves answer that the first order be confirm at  the session and therefore it ought to have be express adjudge in the second  order that he have gain a Barnardiston king b subsequent settlement accord the  court say that this very point be determine about two year ago and therefore  the court quash all the order