coke appeal OF robbery a upon a appeal of robbery the defendant be acquit and  the jury find what damage they have sustain and also that the party who bring  the appeal can not satisfy the damage and they further find who be the abettor  the appellor be a pregnant woman be let out upon mainprize to have her body to  satisfy the damage the defendant ought to recover their damage whole against  the principal or whole against the abettor and not part against one and part  against the other the damage shall be assess several a appeal of murder  treason felony and other offence be abolish by stat Geo c coke report er p if  the appellor can pay his body shall be take ad to give satisfaction the  abettor shall not be conclude by the find of the jury h p c Inst bro appeal  Dany hawk c sect c among the record in the treasury etinter placita in person  lord ring de boundary consecrated mich year Edward rot cornubia Helena son  hugonis Allot bring a appeal of robbery against Laurence Boskosleake Richard  cohort Jo Gilman and Johan his wife and diverse other the defendant plead not  guilty c and be find not guilty of the felony c going ind aforesaid nec unquan  see subtraxeru therefore predictus Laurentiusetom S all at rest etprdicla  Helena pro fabso appeal his To bring together prisonce in custodian Marescall  Richard de Inworth Marescalli c et super coke hoc predictus Laurevthts et some  to strive for juxta form to cause to stand quod a swearer hoc inquirant queen  financial loss prad Laurentius et alff to hold up occasion falsehood appeal  predicti et si prd Helena sit sufficient ad financial loss to loosen et sm  prdic per hoc qusitum be a prfatis juratoribus queen damna frankincense  Laurentiusetalii suslinuerunt one by one occasion preceding who to say quod  predictus Laurentius to hold up financial loss ad valentian et Richard cohort  ad valentian et Johannes Gilman et Johanna wife speech John Gilman et such one  by one de cteris queen thirst be si preceding Helena sit sufficient ad aliquan  financial loss to loosen who to say quod non Qusitum quis well who abellavil  well abbellaverunt prfatam helenam ad appeal predictam prosequend who to say  quod Johannes Riddel senior Johannes Riddel junior though Drury et Alicia  allet abbettaverunt prfatam helenam therefore Self distringa secundum form to  cause to stand ad to answer c out of which record these thing be to be observe  although it be enact by the statute of Westmin cap that in this case justice c  punia appellant per prison One striving c and accord to the court commit to  prison c so that they be not bailable yet because eaden Helena pregnans to be  et in danger death she be let out upon mainprize to have her body hich ad to  give satisfaction predido Laurentio etaliis de financial loss one by one  adjudicates occasion predicta and the reason of this be for this that the  commonlaw require in every case conveniency and it be inconvenient that a  woman with child shall remain in common gaol sub salv et to shut up custodian  where woman can resort to her upon time as necessity shall require forthwith  for conveniency and principal where it be for avoid the danger of death the  court have power to put her mainprize until she be deliver for it ought to be  a truth concern the judge of the commonlaw which the moral poet have speak  Redderepersonce inquire agreement whoever it be and with it agree that advice  which Bracton give to the judge lib cap to sit down judge effectually quid it  is necessary secundum need quid expedierit secundum usefulness quid to tie to  be secundum permissionem et quid it was becoming secundum honor that the  defendant recover their damage either whole against the principal or whole  against the abettor and not part against the one and part against the other  and that the record be qusitum be sipredicta Helena be sufficient ad aliquan  financial loss to loosen and with this it be agree in Edward although that the  statute say to set up again appellant financial loss appellee yet the damage  shall be one by one assess for that the word be further secundum separation  justice condition looking back ad prison well arrestationem c so that  forasmuch as the cause of damage be several as the defarnation c of the one  may be great than the other so the damage of the one may be great than of the  other that although that the appellor be not sufficient for to pay yet his  body shall be take ad to give satisfaction because who non to have in core to  loose in corpore that although that the juror in the appeal have find the  defendant abettor yet insomuch as they be stranger to the original they shall  not be conclude for coke report er p they shall be distrain ad to answer and  so that they may plead not guilty or other plea because res inter elsewhere  actce one mocere non to withhold vide the book of entry title appeal division  damage I and and this do appear also by the say statute which say that si  abettor coke intimacy sit de hujusmodi abelfat per ill will to punish per  prisonametlenetur ad rebuilding hurt to make