atkins case Bridgman versus dove November a devise to sir I b her heir Clifton  land he pave all debt and legacy charge on these land and after his decease to  a nephew sir I b as tenant for life be oblige to keep down the interest if the  principal be not discharge but if it be he be to pay one three and the  reversioner two three a person by her will say I declare sir I Bridgman my  heir of Clifton land he pay all such legacy as I shall charge on these land  after his decease to my nephew Roger Bridgman doctor of divinity in tail with  remainder over to other person by a codicil in the testatrix give a annuity to  be pay out of the Clifton estate by sir I Bridgman if he survive her and if  not then by her nephew Roger Bridgman I devise to sir John Bridgman my heir  Clifton land he pay all debt and legacy charge on these land and after his  decease to my nephew Bridgman doctor of divinity in another part of her will  she say f leave my jewel plate picture medal furniture to my two executor to  be equal divide in the last clause of the will she say create saint mary and  create saint olaf I make liable to all debt I have contract since note or bind  if any and what remain to be pay to mary dove spinster after the Creatings be  sell Lord chancellor a principal question be whether the debt and legacy shall  be pay out of sir John Bridgmans estate for life notwithstanding the  inaccuracy of the will which be draw by herself her intention appear to I to  charge the legacy upon the Clifton land but not so as to exhaust all the  profit of the estate for life what colour be there to say that this create a  condition on sir John Bridgman that he shall take nothing but upon pay indeed  it will be a strange thing to give a estate for life to a person of year of  age on condition to pay legacy of pound out of a estate of pound per annum by  the latter word there be a plain charge in the will upon these land and  therefore sir John Bridgman as tenant for life be oblige only to keep down the  interest if the principal be not discharge vide partridge v paulet atk but if  discharge to pay one three thereof and the reversioner the other two three his  lordship decree that the legacy be a general charge upon the Clifton estate to  be raise by sale or mortgage that the plaintiff sir I Bridgman shall keep down  the interest of so much of the say legacy as shall not be satisfy by the  personal estate that the principal shall be raise by sale or mortgage and in  case the same shall be raise by mortgage then the plaintiff sir I Bridgman  shall keep down the interest during his life but if by sale then the surplus  money after payment of the say legacy shall be invest in the purchase of land  to be settle to the use in the will Reg lib a fol vide rowel v walley Charles  Rep ballet v spranger Prec Charles Verney v Verney Ves the next question be  relate to the personal estate in all clause with respect to provision for  payment of debt they relate to the time of the death of the testator in order  to make a more honest and faithful provision for payment of debt atkins if it  have be all debt that I owe still it will be extend to the time of her death  the word here be which I have contract have contract must be construe shall  contract I know of no authority where the word I make my real estate liable to  pay my debt will exempt the personal estate without any special exemption of  personal estate atkins er p see Galton v Hancock atk Waller v Jackson ibidem  nor have the court ever say that personal estate shall be apply only to pay  legacy and not the debt nor will make a particular estate in land liable to  pay debt exonerate the personal estate because it be the natural fund for  payment of debt suppose a man devise a real estate liable to the payment of  debt and subject to those debt give it over to another or what remain after  payment of debt which be all one if there be not express word to exempt the  personal estate it shall be first apply and I be of opinion that the residue  of the personal estate here ought first to be apply in exoneration the last  question be upon the devise of the jewel plate picture medal furniture Mr  clarke for the executor have insist that under the word furniture book will  pass and that under the word medal piece of current coin keep with they will  pass if current coin be curious piece and keep with medal I be of opinion  notwithstanding they be current coin yet as they be keep with medal they will  pass as such for even medal themselves be once current coin but as I be at  present advice I be clear of opinion that a library of book will not pass as  furniture so Kelly v powlet Amb nor do it operate at all on my mind that it  will pass as furniture because it be a small library for most common great  library be more often put up as ornament and less accurate choose than small  one as to the case which have be cite of the duke of Beaufort versus Lord  Dundonald and the duchess of Beaufort his wife vern there be very little  opposition be between a mother and son and I lie no stress upon it atkins but  I take it too it have be determine that a library of book will not pass as  furniture and his lordship decree accord Reg lib a fol