ambler case BRADWIN against harpur at the roll saint June mistake in the  description of legatee yet legacy hold good and take place accord to the  intention see dowset v sweet ante and case in the note there and add Colpoy v  Colpoy James Thomas v Thomas t r do v Hurthwaite b a lib Reg a foe a Margaret  Jackson by her will give onesixth of the residue of her personal estate in  trust to be put out at interest and the interest to be pay to her niece mary  Bradwin for life and after her death one moiety of the onesixth to be pay to  the say mary Bradwins grandchild the child of her daughter mary at their age  of twentyone and the other moiety to be pay to whether the daughter of her say  niece mary Bradwin mary Bradwin the niece have two child mary the plaintiff  who be never marry and whether who marry Barnard Robert whether marry Robert  barn and not Barnard Robert l r and die in the lifetime of the testatrix and  before the make of her will leave two child William and Robert barn who be the  other plaintiff the six part amount to pound S and be place out and the  interest pay to mary Bradwin the niece till her death in b that one moiety of  the money may be pay to plaintiff mary and the other moiety to the two barn  upon their attain twentyone upon the foundation that the testatrix so intend  but by a mistake of name have give a moiety to the child of mary who never be  marry and the other moiety to whether who be dead at the time of leave the  child it be prove that the testatrix be eighty year old when she make her will  and live in Derbyshire and that mary Bradwin her niece and her family live at  saint Alban in Hertfordshire and that the testatrix have never see her niece  child or grandchild his honour the master of the bolls be satisfy of the  mistake and of the power of the court to set it right by decree accord to the  intention but doubt at first ambler whether he can do it for want of party  there be only one of the next of kin a party to the suit in that right though  the defendant harpur who be make a party as executor be in fact another of the  next of kin but the next of kin appear to be numerous and live in distant  place and the matter in dispute be very small and the plaintiff a pauper his  honour decree the money to be pay note the counsel for Wilson who be make a  party as claim in right of his wife who be one of the next of kin make the  objection for want of party but do not press it much I be of counsel for the  plaintiff and cite Beaumont v fall wms and Dowsett v sweet d July the former  of which be much strong than the present case as the devisee there be describe  by her name only but here be a sufficient certain description independent of  that part which be mistake videlicet grandchild and daughter v blow in case of  a grant and dare v Geary in chancery that June in case of a will if there be a  certain description and a further description be add it be immaterial whether  the additional description be true or false stand v stand Ves jun smith v  Campbell coop Stockdale v Bushby Ves Holmes v Eustace Ves in wait v temple sim  S a bill be file for the administration of testator estate and it be hold that  where the claim of the next of kin be raise on the record and one person be in  that character a party other person find by the ambler er p master to be next  of kin may be hear by the court though not party but where the claim be not  raise on the record and none of the next of kin be in that character party to  the cause there must be a supplemental bill to bring they before the court  decree declare mary Bradwin daughter to mary Bradwin testatrixs niece become  entitle on her death to a moiety of onesixth of the residue of testatrixs  personal estate she appear to be the same person describe in the will by the  name of Ann daughter of mary Bradwin and that plaintiff W and b barn  grandchild of testatrixs say niece m b become upon death of m b entitle to the  other moiety Payable when they attain twentyone they appear to be the same  person by mistake describe in the say will as grandchild of her niece m b by  her daughter mary