case anonymous prohibition must be on suggestion a prohibition may be grant  after sentence in all case where it appear on the face of the proceed that the  court below have no jurisdiction a prohibition may be ground on a suggestion  of a matter which do not appear on the face of the libel all prohibition be to  be grant upon some suggestion and not otherwise which suggestion be to be  bring into the office but qure of prohibition to the admiralty for the court  of admiralty do not use to set forth the special matter whereon they give  sentence but only recite that they have beard both side and so proceed to give  judgement and then they pretend it be too late to move for a prohibition but  by holt chief justice it be never too late to move for a prohibition after  sentence in any case but one and that be to the ecclesiastical court on the  statute Henry c where the suit be out of the diocese and the reason why a  prohibition be deny in that case be because you have by plead own their  jurisdiction a roll Abr tiler v mantle salk so in the admiralty court it shall  be intend after sentence that they have jurisdiction Ladbroke v cricket term  Rep but wherever in any case it appear on the face of the proceed that the  subject matter be not within the jurisdiction of the inferior court a  prohibition shall go although sentence below have be pronounce see gardener v  booth salk Rebowe v Bickerton bunb synes v synes burr smith v Langley b r h  Dawson v Wilkinson b r h shatter v friend show full v Hutchins Cowp case of  the rector of Bosworth ld ray Blaquiere v Hawkins dougl darly v cozen dougl  notorious facts S c term Rep bishop of Chichester v Harwood term Rep leman v  Goulty term Rep Velthasen v ormsley term Rep a modern report er p and note  although in the case of measure of land v joliffe b hob b a rule be lie down  that for anything not appear in the libel but only modern report suggest as  matter collateral to it no prohibition shall go after sentence c roll Abr godb  Lut Hedd v winter bunb c yet in the case of shatter v friend d show see smith  v Langley b r h d a prohibition go to the spiritual court after sentence where  they have disallow proof by one witness though that matter do not appear in  the libel or sentence and dolben justice in that case say that a prohibition  ought to go rather after sentence than before e Cowp e for then it will best  appear that they have disallow such proof f for prohibition after sentence see  side show Mod Faresl the case of Edmonson v walker show a prohibition to the  admiralty for refuse a plea of claim of property and Mod where a prohibition  shall go if they refuse a plea of the statute of limitation but note note to  former edition f