coke a read case mich Elizabeth in the king bench in trespass the defendant  justify under a lease for year make to he by one W who be seize in fee the  plaintiff in his replication make title by descent and traverse the lease hold  on demurrer the traverse be good the plaintiff may have traverse the seize in  fee in many case the one or the other be traversable in trespass the defendant  plead that a be seize who feoff c who feoff d who estate the defendant bad the  plaintiff may traverse which of they he will and so in all case where the  defendant do not claim by any mean conveyance from the plaintiff himself SC  more in trespass quare enclosed space to break in pieces by William read Esq  against William arminger gentle the defendant justify that a Wheatley Esq be  seize in fee and lease to he for year and justify the plaintiff reply that the  lady Gresham be seize in fee and die seize and the land descend to the  plaintiff and maintain his count without that that Wheatley lease to the  defendant upon which the defendant demurrer and it be object that the seize in  fee be traversable and not the lease for he allege a freehold in a stranger  and if in trespass the defendant say that the place where be the freehold of a  and be by his commandment c the commandment be not traversable if the  plaintiff claim by a stranger a but it be adjudge in chamber v Donaldson east  that such command may be traverse by the plaintiff a for the freehold be  allege in a stranger that ought to be answer but it be adjudge that the  traverse be good and there be a great difference between the say case for in  the one case the plead be that at the time of the trespass suppose it be the  freehold of a moor Cr car Cr Elizabeth Doct pl vide contra e b but in the case  at bar the defendant plead that long time before the trespass Wheatley be  seize c and so seize demise and that may be true and that afterward the lady  Gresham do seize he and a descent be cast so that it be not allege that  Wheatley be seize in fee at the time of the trespass as in the other case and  then the most material thing to be traverse be the lease vide e traverse Br  that in this case the seize in fee be traversable vide Br traverse h e b h h  traverse Elizabeth dyer Elizabeth dyer h e repeat e e and it seem upon all the  say book that the one or the coke report b er p other in many case be  traversable at the pleasure of the plaintiff vide e vide h h double plea in  trespass the coke b defendant plead that a be seize and feoff b who feoff c  who feoff d who estate the defendant have the plaintiff may traverse a Doct pl  a which of they he will e in trespass the defendant b Doct pl Cr James Cr  Elizabeth Doct pi e b b plead that I be seize and feoff b who feoff the  defendant the plaintiff say that one r be seize and die seize and the land  descend to he and traverse without hoc that I feoff b and it be adjudge a good  traverse and so be h and this be true in all case where the defendant do not  claim by any mean conveyance from the plaintiff himself for then that be  traversable b Vid note I porter case Rep a b