case uvarneford against haddock Michaelmas term pound Elizabeth roll a person  who have two part of the reversion of a house may bring waste though the  defendant hold by several title and if default be make after appearance it be  a confession of the waste and the enquiry shall he of the damage only ante  Owen Poph   light Bl Com error to reverse a judgement in a action of  waste First error in the action of w te the defendant appear upon the distress  and after declaration make no answer but judgement be give against he by  nothing dicil and upon the writ award to inquire of the waste and damage the  sheriff go not to the place waste but inquire of it at another place and this  be assign for error say non allocatur for when judgement in waste be give upon  a demurrer or nothing to say the waste be confess and the writ shall he only  to inquire of damage and although the writ do command the sheriff to go to the  place this be but of form and nugation but otherwise it be where judgement be  give by default before appearance so be Elizabeth dyer second error he assign  the waste in a house and by his title it appear the p laintiff have only two  part of the reversion of the house say non allocatur for although he have but  two part yet he shall punish the defendant for waste do in that which be hold  of the plaintiff and the message be entire he can assign the waste otherwise  and he do count accord to his title three error because it do appear the  defendant have the two part by several demise and therefore though the  plaintiff have the reversion in one band yet he ought to have several action  say non allocalur for he have count upon the whole matter it be as several  count and he may well join they in one action in easter term Elizabeth the  case be move again for that it do appear by the count that the defendant hold  one part of the demise of the plaintiff and the other of the demise of a  stranger which have grant his reversion to the plaintiff so as he have the  reversion by several title he can maintain this action and although he have  declare special how he hold it ex dimission assignation this will not aid he  but if he have make several lease he may have have one action of waste as  Edward S but all the justice hold the contrary for inasmuch as he have show  the truth of his case in his declaration and he have the reversion in one band  he shall maintain this action four error that the sheriff have take a inquest  to inquire of the waste whereas the judgement be by confession it ought not to  he inquire but because diverse precedent be so it be award no error and the  judgement be affirm note in this term die sir Roger manwood chief baton and he  be succeed by sir William periam Knt one of the judge of the common plea croak  Elizabeth er p croak Elizabeth hilary term Elizabeth in the queen hench sir  John Popham Knt chief justice sir Francis gawdy Knt Edward Fenner Esq John  Clench Esq justice sir Thomas Egerton Knt attorneygeneral sir Edward coke Knt  solicitor general