aprice versus hay in ejection strong upon a special verdict the case be this  videlicet a prior in convent in primo h make a lease of land for three life to  a and afterward make another lease of the same land to b for fifty year and  afterward make another concurrent lease for sixty year to a three person  afterward these land come to the hand of king Henry the eight by the  dissolution of monastery and from he by descent to queen Elizabeth who in June  year royal power Himself seven recite the good service perform by one Jones in  France who be slay there in consideration of eighty pound pay and for the  maintain of his wife and child and recite the say lease for three life and  that twoof they be expire grant the say land to the wife of Jones for sixtyone  year after the expiration of the say lease for three life or whensoever the  say land shall come by any mean into the king hand and the sole question be  when the lease make to the wife of Jones be to commence videlicet from the  death of the last beneficiary and vie or after the expiration of the lease for  and year and whether or no the party have a election to have it commence at  the expiration of the lease for life or those for year Hardres Montague pro  quer the lease to Jones wife commence from the expiration of the lease for and  year for so the queen intend and the grantee will else have no benefit by it  which the queen design she shall have and here be a consideration of money pay  which else will return to no account and it be for the queen honour to have  her patent so construe and if the law will not make that construction yet the  grantee or her assignee who be the party here concern shall have their  election to have the lease commence after the lease for year be determine ut  ring to greater extent to be strong for that the word here be in the  disjunctive which always find in favour of the person that be to take by they  vide   the bishop of bath case   the earl of Rutland case Trin b r Stevens and  capel ease dyer car Keble c hall case b r and that such election shall go to  the assignee vide more Rep Rep Cluns case and so he conclude pro quer  afterward in Hillary term car winnington argue pro to ward off first be say  the queen be deceive in her grant and therefore the patent void because she do  not recite all the lease that be in be but to this it be say and hold per  curian that no lease in be need to be recite but only those that be upon  record and not lease make by subject which by intendment can be know nor  discover by the party but winnington urge that the king grant shall be void  when the king be deceive and where his grant operate contrary to his intention  Rep Yelv Rep Anders I part Rep second he conceive that the lease to Jones his  wife commence after the death of the last beneficiary and vie vide Plo Com  stapletons case Rep dyer Stevens and hall case hill and that the lessee shall  not have a election against the king because here the king take notice of the  estate for three life only and mention no other and therefore the king  intention shall be take to have be that the lease shall commence then and the  statute of Elizabeth of confirmation do not make this lease good and conclude  pro defend Stroud pro quer the interest grant to Jones his wife shall commence  when the land be to come into the queen band and not before for these follow  reason Hardres first in regard of the consideration which be the service  perform by Jones in his lifetime and the maintenance of his wife and child for  if the other exposition be admit it will not be effectual for the benefit of  the grantee second in regard of the profit which the queen have by grant it  which be which be a valuable consideration and for which there ought to be a  recompense but there will be no recompense in this case for it if the lease  begin at any other time than at the end of former lease for year three the  intention of the queen and of the party be so and the queen charity imply as  much who design to confer a boon upon the patentee Hardres er p fourthly the  rend be reserve so as to become due after the death of the last beneficiary  and vie five the king grant shall be construe beneficial for the subject so  far forth as such construction be consonant to the rule of law six the king  intent appear to be so and the word which shall first happen shall be  understand to make a estate good and not to destroy a estate bro patent in I  Rep former lease need not be recite and if word may be take in two different  sense that sense shall be take which make the grant good Edward object the  estate for three life be only take notice of resp it be not formal recite but  be only mention in a clause where it be say who in all respects be to come  into the queen band post c object it shall be intend to commence after the  death of the last beneficiary and vie for the benefit of the child resp for  that reason it shall be intend to commence after the lease for year be end  because that be more beneficial for they and he conclude pro to ward off hale  chief baron there be no question but the last lease be good in its creation  and it may take effect in reversion or by surrender of the other lease and if  it have be for one hundred year it will have be good for so many of they as  remain unexpired at the determination of the other lease but when it shall  commence depend upon the exposition of the letter patent if it be intend to be  a lease in reversion all be well but if the king intend to grant a lease in  possession then the grant be void though there be a Hardres rend reserve for  the rend will not be Payable till the lease take effect in interest and if all  the lease have be recite the lessee may have have a election because then the  king have take notice of the estate in be but here they be not recite but the  patent refer only to the estate for three life and that determination of that  estate by surrender forfeiture or elsewhere modus et adjornatur