CARESWELL against vaughan ante voucher William except that in case of  particular estate for life or in tail the title must be in the writ f n b or  in the count and assize Br on h reconcile the former book Edward per Needham  that demand as law boereditatem may be general the judgement quod to answer  ouster be only to look at closely and say not per curian as the peremptory  judgement be the voucher need not be of a person name in the writ as in a  assize which be on the particular reason of the recognitors presence at the  day to allow it which be not in quod ei deforceat in nature of a writ of entry  Inst the like of essoins   Entr which lie not in a assize but in quod ei  deforceat it do and by assize Br other difference be take in dilatories and  bar and process of both and that a voucher will lie in quod ei deforceat Inst  be a authority in point and quod ei deforceat Br and Edward voucher Br and  foreign voucher be   Entr not take away by any statute W cap or of gloc cap  which only regulate they and Edward cap the like and before h cap any  foreigner may be vouch in England or Wales and that statute give liberty to  the session to try a voucher in England without regard to the voucher so of  foreign plead yet both be try below which the court deny this counterplea  shall be aver both which latter exception be overrule before and judgement  affirm as to those nisi Moreton except that the writ of error be bring too  soon the writ of enquiry of damage be not return but per curian on   metcalf  case and   Specots case if there be a complete judgement as quod recupere and  not quod recuperar to withhold error lie without writ of enquiry and so it  have be resolve in ejectment latch and the party may at any time after release  the damage here the judgement Keble be perfect as to the land or the party may  have a writ of enquiry here if it be needful Jones pro defendant in error that  h cap be only that session shall be keep and continue six day and appoint no  day when it shall begin and the continuance be only to Wednesday in the grand  session which be well enough every day be a retornday which the court agree  and albeit a Sunday be between the continuance be well enough as to the court  it be well enough raze Entr and entry Fitzherbert and the court in writ of  entry never show by who or of who gift the estate be but unde seisitus ut de  book tenement as the count be here and must be intend for Keble er p his own  life but Moreton on raze doubt and Twisden also as on avowry in replevin by  lease of I S who be seize not say for what estate but per curian any precedent  be show thus they will never reverse the judgement post