case Langston against Blackmore Nov see Morgan v Gronow l r Eq in re turner  settle estate Ch d execution of a power of appointment to child hold good  though it extend to the issue of one of they under the special circumstance of  the case lib Reg b foe nom Langdon v Blackmore on marriage of George  Southcombe with Dorothy his wife by indenture of d may a leasehold estate be  assign to trustee to the use of George Southcombe for life remainder to his  wife for life remainder to the child of the marriage with power for the father  to appoint the whole or any part to any one or more child of that marriage if  there shall be more than one there be four child of the marriage and on d may  by deed of appointment in which the wife join George the father in  consideration of pound pay to he and pound to his son George by Lewis his old  son and for other consideration appoint the estate to trustee as to one moiety  to the use of himself for life remainder to the use of Lewis for life and as  to the other moiety immediate to the use of Lewis for life remainder as to the  whole to such wife as Lewis shall marry for her life remainder to the issue of  the body or child or child of Lewis and for want of such issue to the use of  the other son of George Southcombe the father and of their son or issue male  or of such one or more of such other son of the say George Southcombe to who  Lewis by deed or will shall give or dispose of the same and for want of such  issue male to the executor or assign of Lewis for the residue of the term  Lewis die without issue John be the only survive son and afterward die leave a  son and a daughter the son be dead and the daughter be plaintiff and bring  this bill to be relieve against the appointment several objection be make to  the appointment by Murray attorneygeneral Pratt v Jones ambler saint that it  be find in corruption it ought to be a pure gift for the benefit of Lewis and  no consideration ought to be take for the appointment d that George Southcombe  be confine as to the object that be to the child personal and can not give any  part or interest to the issue of the child ambler er p d that the remainder in  default of issue be give to the other son of George Southcombe general which  be not warrant by the power for that confine the appointment to the son of  that marriage and the generality of the appointment will let in son of a  second marriage Lord Hardwicke chancellor stop the counsel for the defendant  and say it be a very plain case I agree that the father can take any benefit  to himself but must appoint to a child or child and can give any part or  interest to a stranger but if a further advantage be give to the child than he  can have have under the power and the father sell to the child part of his own  interest in the estate this court will not weigh the quantums of the  consideration pay for it whether it be adequate to the advantage in the  present case the mother right to a moiety be give up and she have join in the  appointment the sum of pound pay by Lewis to his brother George be to be  consider as part of the appointment in Thwaytes v die vern there be such a  power and the father appoint a rentcharge out of the estate to the young son  and in a certain event pound apiece to his two daughter and hold a good  appointment ambler to d question the appointment to Lewis and his family with  his consent be good for if it have be to Lewis absolute he may immediate  afterward have settle it in that manner this court never set such a  appointment aside to d question several answer may be give to this objection  saint if it have be in the power of George Southcombe to appoint to any other  of his son in default of issue of Lewis yet that must be take to mean such son  as be then exist the appointment be forty year after the power when George  Southcombe be old have several child by his then wife and not likely to have  any by a second wife bill dismiss with cost see lane v page ante brudenell v  Elwes east Ves Jun Bristol v ware Ves Jun Alexander v Alexander Ves Dillon v  Dillon b b Robert v Dixwell Eq can Abr pl the principle upon which such a  appointment be support in equity be that it operate first as a appointment to  the child and second as a settlement by he for the same reason a appointment  of personalty to the child of a marry daughter who be herself the object of  the power be valid if make with the concurrence of the husband see white v  saint Barbe Ves b Routledge v Dorril Ves jun Alexander v Alexander Ves sen  brystow v ware Ves jun Tucker v Sanger I MClel