coke Report26b neal and jackson case pasch Elizabeth in the common plea SC cro  Elizabeth SC cite send for Watk Cop two Cru dig vin Abr copyhold h pl z d pl  Com dig copyhold b g Bac Abr copyhold king Sembl contra pale yellow ten see  the note and reference infra if the lord demise the freehold of all the  copyhold within lip manor for year the copyhold remain and the lessee shall  bold customary court diversity where the inheritance of many and where of one  single copyhold only be grant it be adjudge by Anderson chief justice of the  common plea walmesley d totan curian that where the lord of a manor demise all  his land grant by copy of the demesne and parcel of the service as each of  they be in by act of law each have a manor post   a so it have be hold that a  tenant in dower of a three part of a manor have a manor and may hold court and  grant copyhold brag case godb ED king see pale yellow ten sup n f ED h roll    light a b Bridgm pale yellow ten Watk Cop vin Abr copyhold l pl n b pl Com of  copyhold g I post a Owen   light a Cr Elizabeth roll b n c Br court baron Br  tenant per Copy l S p Clifton v Molineux post a pale yellow ten vin Abr  copyhold n b pl court h pl Com dig copyhold g Acc ld raym dub pale yellow ten  Watk Cop the learned writer last refer to observe that most of the case as in  the present instance suppose the admission by the steward to have be at a  court hold out of the manor that it be clear that a court can be hold out of  the manor unless it be that special custom as where a court be hold in one  manor for a whole manor in which there be several manor Inst a cro car and  therefore this reason do not a ply to ail admittance mere as such since a  admittance may clear be out of court and as to the case of Tukely v Hawkins ld  raym so far as it relate to this point it seem to be complete answer by the  reason in that of Dudfield v Andrews salk which appear to apply as well to a  admission as to a surrender in Tukely v Hawkins sup it be hold that the  steward of a manor may take the surrender of a copyhold out of the manor and a  custom to the contrary be void but he can admit out of the manor see also wood  a steward as incident to his office may by the general custom of all manor  take a surrender out of court Dudfield v Andrews sup or as already observe out  of the manor though he be appoint by parole post   b so surrender to a deputy  steward be good Parker v Keck Com Rep ld raym salk more so if make to a person  appoint by a deputy steward though it be take out of the kingdom Heggor v  felston Leon but a surrender out of court by the hand of a bailiff or reeve or  of one or two tenant of the manor must be warrant by a special custom Inst a I    Cop S Tr post   a b roll Rep Kitch b ED coke report a er p to another for  two thousand year that such lessee coke Report27a may a hold a court for the  copyhold a accord to the resolution of the three point in Melwichs case and in  this case it be say that so it be resolve by all the justice in the cage of  sir Charles b Hatton late Lord chancellor of England touch copyhold in  Wellingborough in Northamptonshire notam reader a good difference between  these case which consist upon number of copyhold which may support a custom  and one single case of a copyhold b as in Murrels case before in which the  lord do not grant tacit any customary court nor the grantee have but one  single copyhold can hold court c