coke b John Talbot case hill James if there be lord and tenant by fealty and  heriot service and the lord purchase part of the land the heriot service be  extinct Resolved I some entire service by alienation of parcel of the tenancy  shall be multiply and some entire service by alienation of parcel shall not be  multiply the four manner of entire service what they be and when multiply  there be no difference between entire annual service valuable or of pleasure  which shall be multiply and such entire service not annual I if the tenant  have first feoff a stranger of part of the land hold and then have feoff the  lord of another part the heriot service will have remain for the land the  stranger hold if a heriot be due by the custom of the manor upon the death of  the tenant and the lord purchase part of the tenancy such purchase will not  extinguish the lord right to a heriot SC Brownl   a b sand d n d Vol I p f n b  d Com dig susp c Bac ab her b John chapman bring a writ of second deliverance  against John Pendleton of two heifer take at Albrighton in a place call  Bromley in Albrighton in the county of Salop c the defendant make conusans as  bailiff to John Talbot Esq and say that the place where c contain three acre  of pasture lie in a field call Bromley in Albrighton and that one John chapman  father of the say John chapman who heir he be be seize of the say three acre  of pasture in fee and hold they of the say John Talbot as of his manor of  Albrighton in the say county by fealty and suit of court to the manor from  three week to three week and by the service to render after the death of every  tenant of the say three acre of pasture in which c die thereof seize optimum  animal such tenant have at the time of his death nomin heriotti of which  service he be seize by the hand of the say John chapman the father as by the  hand of his very tenant c and the say John chapman the father so be thereof  seize die seize thereof and that at the time of his death he be possess of a  ox of the a ante a Cr James Plowd a a price of S as of his proper ox which ox  to be optimum animal of the say John chapman the father which he have at the  time of his death c and because the say heriot be behind and not deliver the  defendant as bailiff of the say John Talbot acknowledge the take of the cattle  aforesaid in the place where c as infra fee et dominium suum etcetera in bar  of which the say John chapman now plaintiff say that before the say John  chapman his father have any thing in the say three acre of pasture one John  Barney be seize of a house and a halfyard coke a land of meadow and pasture  contain by estimation fifty acre in Albrighton aforesaid whereof the say three  acre of pasture in which c be parcel in his demesne as of fee and the say  house and half yard land meadow and pasture entire hold of the say John Talbot  as of his say manor by fealty suit to court and heriot service after the death  of every tenant die thereof seize and the say John Barney be so seize of the  say message and half yard entire year Elizabeth of three acre of land parcel  of the say half yard land feoff the say John Talbot to have and to bold to he  and his heir and afterward year Elizabeth of the say three acre of pasture in  which c feoff the say John chapman the father to have and to bold to he and  his heir who die thereof seize and they descend to John chapman the now  plaintiff c upon which the avowant demurrer in law and the only question in  this case be if the lord have by the purchase of the say three acre of pasture  in which c parcel of the tenement hold of he by heriot service extinguish his  heriot or not and the avowants counsel do insist strong upon the word of  Littleton lib cap ult fol where he say that notwithstanding coke report b er p  the purchase of parcel c by the lord the b Litt S   light a b light a brown b  homage and fealty remain entire to the lord for the lord shall have the homage  and fealty of his tenant for the remnant of the land and tenement hold of he  as he have before because such service be not annual service and can be  apportion which reason prove as it be urge that the heriot service in the case  at bar continue for this service be not annual be due only on the death of the  tenant and can be apportion because it be entire sure optimum animal so they  say that it appear by Littleton lib cap and c light S light a   b   light a c  Edward a b that he who hold by knight service ought to go in person or find  another able person for he proper array for the war c which be a entire  service and yet Littleton say where above fol that if the lord purchase part  of the land so hold d light S   light b light a d the escuage shall be  apportion which prove that the tenure by knight service remain for the residue  and the reason be as it be urge because the entire service be not annual and  the service by the body of a man can be apportion also they cite the book in  Edward a   a a Heriot where it be hold that if my tenant who hold of I by a  heriot alien parcel of his land to another each of they be Chargeable to I of  a heriot because it be entire and although the tenant purchase the land again  c I shall have of he for each portion a heriot so in the case at bar although  the lord purchase coke b parcel of the land yet he shall have a heriot for the  residue for it be entire and not annual but it be answer and adjudge per totan  curian that in the case at bar the heriot b   light b b service be extinct and  first the resolution in c   c Bruertons case in the six part of my report be  affirm to be good law by the whole court and in this case these point be  resolve that some entire service by alienation of parcel of the tenancy shall  be d   light d multiply sure that every several alienee shall pay several  entire service and some entire service by alienation of parcel shall not be  multiply but the lord shall be content with one among all the several alienees  and as to that it must be know that there be four manner of entire service  when a thing entire be it a chattel valuable or a thing of pleasure shall be  render and pay by the tenant to the lord a chattel valuable as a horse a ox  gild spur a how or arrow a sword a gauntlet or such like thing of pleasure as  a falcon or other bird a dog or such thing of pleasure all such entire service  by alienation of parcel of the tenancy shall be multiply and every alienee  shall render the entire service a Mr Watkins in his treatise on copyhold Vol p  state that where the heriot be reserve on a grant in fee the heriot will not  be multiply by alienation unless the tenant convey a fee for in the case of a  grant for year life or in tail the donee will hold of the donor and the donor  will still continue tenant of the lord for the whole land but in the case of a  grant to a for life remainder over in fee to a stranger so that the whole fee  pass from the grantor there a the particular tenant shall hold of the lord and  not of he who make the grant or gift and consequent a heriot will be due on  the death of a Mr Watkins further distinguish between those who take a portion  of the fee by act of law and those who take by the act of the party those take  by the act of the party do not become tenant to the lord and therefore on  their death no heriot be due the husband take his courtesy be in by act of law  and as he at least in case where he take the whole estate be tenant to the  lord a heriot will be due on his death whereas a widow take her dower and so  take by act of law except in case where she do take the whole be tenant to the  heir and therefore on her death no heriot will be due vin ab Heriot b Mr  Watkins also observe that if a person seize in fee of freehold land grant to a  for life with remainder to b for life remainder to c for life with remainder  to d in fee a b c and d shall hold of the lord as the whole fee be dispose of  but as the particular interest grant to a and the several remainder limit to b  c and d form together but one estate it shall seem to follow that a b c and d  form but one tenant to the lord and consequent that but one heriot can be due  and that on the death of the survivor of they copyhold Vol two Mr Scriven in  his treatise of copyhold Vol I p be of a different opinion Mr Watkins  afterward state that if either alien his portion it shall seem that a heriot  will be due on the alienation of each as the respective alienors will cease to  be tenant by their own act and the respective alienees will be in of a new  estate in Kitch it be lie down that to have a heriot after the death of tenant  for life or year be heriot custom and that heriot service be after the death  of tenant in fee but it seem to be now agree that heriot service may be  reserve on the grant of a less estate Fid Watk copyhold serjeant William note  to Lanyon v meat sand note a Bruertons case   b a and yet by the coke report a  er p purchase of parcel by the lord the whole be a   b more   light a Bac ab  exting a a extinct as it be resolve in the say case of Bruerton the second be  a personal service to be do by the tenant to the person of the lord as homage  fealty knight service to be b   a b carver sewer butler or such personal  service to the lord andsome of these shall multiply and some not and therefore  homage and fealty by alienation of parcel shall multiply because when the  tenant do homage or fealty he do they for all the tenement which he hold of  the lord so that these service extend to the entire tenancy and every parcel  of it and although the lord purchase part yet the homage and fealty remain for  the residue so that although Littleton where above hold that the homage and  fealty by purchase of parcel shall not be extinct but shall remain for the  residue because such service be not annual and can be apportion yet that be c    light a c ratio One send non only as appear before so knight service which  be a entire service to be perform by the body of a man shall be also multiply  by the alienation of parcel and although the lord purchase parcel the knight  service shall not be extinct but shall remain for the residue because d    light a b   a d pro good public et pro defension royal power and the escuage  shall be apportion but the personal service of sewer carver butler c or when  the tenant isbound by his tenure ad convivand dominium suum et household svan  semel in year et ad coke a equitand cum lord his in come n cost nest not  common with others c vide Edward in John de Bromptons case by alienation of  parcel it shall not be apportion nor multiply for such service which be for  the private benefit of the lord and be personal to be do by a man shall not be  multiply because they be to be personal do by one man only and multiplication  of they will be a prejudice and Chargeable to the tenant and the purchase of  parcel of the tenancy by the lord will extinguish all such personal private  service the three be when the tenant be to exercise a personal office as to be  steward of the court of the manor or bailiff of the manor or collector of the  rend of the manor or uvoodward of the manor or the like office they by  alienation of parcel of the tenancy shall not be multiply but the lord may  distrain each of they in these case to do it but one only shall exercise it  and if the lord purchase any part of the tenancy the whole service be extinct  the four be when the tenant by his tenure be to do manual labour or work touch  house land or tenement as to cover or repair the e   a e hall of the lord  house or to make or repair his park pale or to plough or sow the lord demesne  c or to reap his corn or to cut his grass or molar grain svan or such like  these or other service by alienation of parcel shall not be multiply for these  work be to be do on a certain thing which can be multiply it be resolve that  there be no difference between entire annual service be they valuable or thing  of pleasure and which shall be multiply as aforesaid and between such entire  service not annual as if lord and tenant be to render a horse every three four  or five year or upon alienation or death in these and the like coke report b  er p case if the lord purchase parcel of the tenancy such entire service not  annual shall be as well extinct as the like annual service it be resolve that  if John Barney have first feoff John chapman the father of the say three acre  of pasture and afterward have feoff the lord of the say three acre of land and  notwithstanding the heriot service have remain for the land which John chapman  the father hold and the reason be because John chapman by his purchase of  three acre hold by one several and distinct tenure of heriot service and  therefore the purchase of the lord of any part of the residue which John  Barney hold will extinguish only the heriot which he ought to render and not  the heriot which John chapman by reason of his distinct and separate tenure  ought to pay there be a difference between heriot service and heriot a   light  b brown Plowd a custom as to the extinguishment thereof when coke b the lord  purchase parcel of the tenancy for if the lord purchase parcel of the tenancy  the heriot service be extinct but if the custom of the manor be that upon the  death of every tenant of the manor who die seize of any land hold of the same  manor the lord shall have a heriot although the lord purchase part of the  tenancy yet the lord shall have a heriot by the b Watk Cop   light b brown h b  custom of the manor for the residue for be remain tenant to the lord and the  custom extend to every tenant vide reader the book cite in the case of  Bruerton   c by which these difference with the reason of they will appear