BRACEY and dawson vide before this matter come on again Mr strange argue for  the plaintiff he say he take it to be a clear case be it not for the doubt  arise for the king be concern in interest that the plaintiff have a good title  to the good for this purpose he mention the statute of James salk and lev and  as Barnardiston king b er p to that doubt arise from the king be concern in  interest he apprehend as this case be it make no difference the statute which  this question turn upon be Geo and by that statute he do apprehend that the  money assess upon the division be not to be consider the king money while in  the hand of the collector but only after it come into the hand of the receiver  general the collector be only consider as the servant to the respective person  charge in the division to pay their money over to the receiver and be appoint  by they the receiver general be consider as servant to the king to pay the  money over to the exchequer he do however agree that a extent will have reach  this money in the hand of the collector and that from the time of the testae  of it but submit it that the warrant in the present case can not have such a  effect that this warrant be no matter of record and therefore the good of the  collector be not bind by it till the time the warrant be execute upon they Mr  Moreton argue on the other side and even in regard to the first point submit  it to be not so clear for which purpose he cite Ven and cro with regard to the  second he say he do agree that the division have a power of appoint two  assessor one of which the collector shall be but the commissioner have the  power of nominate which of the assessor shall be the person and therefore he  submit Barnardiston king b it when the money be pay into the collector hand it  be consider as the money of the king if this be so he do not see but the good  must be bind from the testae of the warrant equal as in the case of a extent  and that this warrant no otherwise differ from a extent than that it be a more  expeditious remedy the court say they will consider of this case among  themselves and then deliver their opinion vide postea