case BLUMFIELD against ROSEWITH ante easter term Elizabeth Plac queen if  judgement in debt he obtain against two joint and several obligors and one he  take in execution and escape whether execution can he have against the other  SC ante   b more cro James cro car roll Rep Ro ab Bac Abr the case be now move  again and recite to he such may and Blunifield be oblige joint and several to  the defendant he sue they several by several bill and have judgement against  they several and afterward sue a she jas ad to give satisfaction against may  who be take in execution and the sheriff suffer he to escape and afterward he  sue execution against Blunifield who be thereupon take bring a hearing  complaint comprise all this matter and whether it lie or not be demurrer in  law gawdy and Fenner hold that the execution be well sue against the plaintiff  for the difference will he where one be discharge out of execution b the act  of the party himself to who he be indebt as by a release or make he his  executor or the like and where one S discharge by his own act or the act of a  stranger as by the sheriff permit he to escape for in the first it be a  discharge for both but it be not so in the last and if one of they die in  execution it be not any discharge for the other and if they be sue by one  original and severalprcoci pes yet he may have have several capias ad to give  satisfaction against they and so both shall he in execution at one and the  same time as Henry S and although the entry upon such a record be quod only  fiat execution yet that shall he intend oh he a execution with satisfaction  but when they be sue by several original or by bill as this case be there be  no question but that several execution may he sue wherefore c Popham conceive  that the plaintiff shall he relieve for the obligee have take against his  companion as great satisfaction as possible he may have for he be in execution  and discharge not new execution may he against he of his body good or land c  and because it be a execution with so great satisfaction as may he the other  shall not he charge croak Elizabeth er p but I agree when the one be in  execution that the other may he take in execution when they be sue by several  original or bill for non constat curio that it be all one debt but when they  he sue by one original and several proecipes I doubt that when the one be in  execution by a capias whether the other may he take by another capias for it  appear to we upon the record that all be but for one debt and the entry of the  record be qubd only tant and mfiat execution and it be clear that if one of  they he take by a capias ad to give satisfaction a become facias or elegit can  be award against the other and so be Edward pl Edward f pl et adjour nature a