case hannis against packer devise after payment of debt and legacy legacy give  by a codicil not attest to charge land may be raise upon the land under this  general charge in the will lib Reg a foe nom hannis v stone S c hark ms Numb  in chancery that Nov mary Meredith be entitle to a real and personal estate  duly make her will that January and devise to her sister all the rest and  residue of her teal and personal estate after payment of her debt and legacy  and make they executrixs the testator some time afterward make a codicil and  give plaintiff a legacy in the word follow this I desire may be perform by my  love sister to give pound to my cousin Edward hannis but this codicil be not  execute in the presence of any witness the question make be whether the pound  legacy give by the codicil be a charge upon the real estate these case be cite  on the part of plaintiff master v master wms brudenell v Boughton that march  Lord inchiquin v obrian ante Lord Hardwicke chancellor when a real estate be  duly devise to trustee and be well charge by a will duly execute with debt and  legacy debt which are contract after make the will or legacy give by a codicil  though not duly execute will be a charge upon the real estate for the real  estate be well charge by the will with the debt and legacy and it be  immaterial by what instrument they appear provide such instrument have be  prove as part of the will and when that be do it be sufficient to denote the  trust and that it be part of what be intend to be comprise where a testator  have by a will duly attest charge his real estate in aid of his personal  general with the payment of debt and legacy the real estate will be Chargeable  with debt afterward contract and legacy subsequent give by codicil though  unattested master v master p W brudenell v Boughton atk Cox v Basset Ves  inchiquin v French ante Sheddon v Goodrich Ves see the reason of this rule  harbinger v Vincent Ves rise v cunningham Ves so where there be such general  charge in the will the testator may by a unattested codicil dispose of the  whole or part of his personal estate and thereby throw his debt and legacy  whole on his real estate Cox v Basset Ves buckeridge v Ingram Ves Jun or he  may by such a codicil revoke or alter any of the legacy give by the will or  substitute other buckeridge v Ingram Ves Jun brudenell v Boughton atk  attorneygeneral v ware yes Sheddon v Goodrich Ves but the above rule will not  apply where by the will the land be not general but only particular charge as  with legacy hereby or hereinafter give or abovementioned master v master p W  Buoner v bonner Ves nor where under the will the land be not charge in aid of  the personal estate only but be make the primary fund for the payment of the  debt or legacy brudenell v Boughton atk harbinger v Vincent Ves Jun Sheddon v  Goodrich Ves Hooper v Goodwin Ves but though where the charge by the will be  not general the testator may not by a unattested codicil give fresh legacy he  may substitute one legatee for another attorneygeneral v ware Ves the codicil  be without date DecreeTo compute interest on the legacy give by the will  particular on the legacy of pound give by the say codicil from the end of one  year after the death of the testator and if the personal estate shall not be  sufficient to pay the debt and legacy the deficiency to be raise out of the  real estate by sale or mortgage ambler er p