ambler case lade against Holford see nqueen v mead l t devise to I I for life  remainder to his first and other son in tail male with a proviso that if the  devisees entitle to the possession of the estate shall be several under the  age of the trustee shall receive the rend and apply they as direct I I die  leave a son under and hold the proviso be void as against he see duke of  Marlborough v Godolphin Eden S c bro p c Lord Southampton v marquis of  Hertford v b see king v burchell ante heath v heath Eden S c hill ms b l bull  burr sir John lade by will of that August devise his manor c to certain person  to the use of his cousin John Jaskip for life with remainder to his first and  ambler er p other son in tail male with remainder over to Ann nut and her  first and other son in tail male with remainder over provide and he direct  that during such time as his cousin John Jaskip shall be under the age of year  and so often as and during such time as the person who for the time be in case  I have not otherwise direct will by virtue of this my will and the limitation  herein contain have be entitle in possession to the say devise premise and the  estate to be purchase or the trust thereof as tenant for life in his own right  or tenant in tail male shall be several under the age of year his say trustee  and their heir executor administrator or assign shall or may enter upon the  premise and take there sand profit and apply the same in manner follow to  reimburse themselves cost and charge their maintenance and the residue in such  manner as the residuum of his personal estate be thereinafter direct to be  apply and he then devise his copyhold and leasehold to the same use and then  give the residue of his personal estate to trustee upon trust to lie it out in  land to be settle to the same use and subject to such proviso limitation c as  he have before limit his manor c John Jaskip have take the name of lade accord  to the will of the testator bring a bill to have the trust of the will perform  and have a decree for that purpose he afterward die leave his wife ensient of  the plaintiff in who name the present bill be bring for the direction of the  court and on hear the cause a question be make whether the proviso be not void  as be repugnant to the estate before devise to the plaintiff in tail and a  case be ambler make for the opinion of the court of kingsbench with the follow  question whether rise full the heir at law of the survive trustee do upon the  birth of the plaintiff take any and what estate in the premise the court of  king bench after hear it argue twice make the follow certificate we have hear  counsel upon the case refer to we and be of opinion that rise full the heir at  law of the survive trustee do not take any estate in the premise devise b  virtue of the proviso in the will of sir John lade that June Mansfield t  denison I e Wilmot