case bennet versus lee December SC ante post Lord Hardwicke doubt whether a  infant son can before he come of age put in a new answer so as to rehear the  cause over again for if there shall be a decree against he on the second hear  he may with as much reason put in a three answer which will occasion infinite  vexation a petition have be present on behalf of Francis lee heir at law to  sir Francis lee grandfather of sir John lee for a bill of review upon a  suggestion of new evidence discover since the decree in the former cause and  which be not in his power at the time of the decree and this be support by  affidavit the material evidence that be insist upon be a deed of settlement in  make by the father of sir John lee in which all the use under that settlement  be spend and the reversion in fee be descend upon Francis lee and his brother  Richard lee who be a infant in gavelkind it be argue on the part of Richard  lee that he be a infant can be preclude by the decree from vary his defence in  the former cause even before he come of age Lord chancellor the doubt with I  be whether a infant can before he come of age put in a new answer so as to  rehear the cause all over again for if there shall be a decree against he upon  the second hear he may with as much reason put in a three answer and make the  proceed endless and by this mean leave it in the power of a guardian to put in  a new answer for he atkins every year during his minority and occasion  infinite vexation n b in the case of Richmond ux versus tayleur p wms it be  hold that a infant aggrieve by a decree be not bind to stay till he be of age  but may apply as soon as he think fit to reverse it and may do this either by  bill or review rehear or original bill allege special the error in the former  decree on the side of the plaintiff Bennet they set up three recovery in and  which if they take in the Kentish estate claim by the defendant be a complete  bar to the petition some objection be make to the validity of these recovery  the cause be order to stand over that the petitioner may have time to look  into they