ccccv crisp and Golding case assumpsit in a action upon the case b crisp  against Golding the case be that a feme sole be tenant for life and make a  lease to the plaintiff for five year to begin after Leonard er p the death of  tenant for life and afterward the of October make another lease to the same  plaintiff for year to begin at Michaelmas next before and declare upon all the  say matter he say army pron  interrog  dimission I e the late lease the  plaintiff enter and be possess Crast Fest S mich which be before the lease  make and further declare that in consideration that the plaintiff have assign  to the defendant these two lease the defendant promise c and upon non  assumpsit it be find for the plaintiff and damage tax l coke argue for the  plaintiff against the solicitorgeneral who have take diverse exception to the  declaration I where two or many consideration be put in the declaration  although that some be void yet if one be good the action well lie and damage  shall be tax accord and here the consideration that the plaintiff shall assign  totum position distinction interest suum quod to have in land predict  exception that the lease in possession be make after Michaelmas I October and  the declaration be army pron  interrog  dimisstonis the defendant enter  tomorrow mich and then he be a seize and can not assign his interest and right  which be suspend in the tortuous seize and so it appear to the judge and be  say there be not here any seize although that the lessee have enter before  that the lease be make for there be a agreement and communication before of  such purpose and intend lease although it be not as yet effect and if there be  any assent or agreement that the lessee shall enter it can be any seize and  here it appear that the lease have his commencement before the make of the  lease and before the entry but put case it be a seize vet be assign all the  interest quod ipse tune to have accord to the word of the consideration and be  deliver both the indenture of the say demise and wherever way data be the  assignment good or void it be not material as to the action for the  consideration be good enough Egerton solicitor contrary in every action upon  the case upon assumpsit there ought to be a consideration promise and breach  of promise and here in our case the consideration be the assignment of a lease  which be to begin after the death of the lessor who be but tenant for life  which be mere void and that appear upon the record and as to the second part  of the consideration and the assignment of the second lease it appear that the  plaintiff at the time have but a right for by his untimely entry before the  make of the lease he be not to be say lessee but be a wrongdoer c in Elizabeth  n the king bench this difference be take by the justice there and deliver open  by the Lord chief justice I when in a action upon the case upon assumpsit two  consideration or more be lie in the declaration but they be not collateral but  pursuant as a be indebt to b in and a promise to b that in consideration that  be owe he and in consideration that b shall give to a S that he will pay to he  the say at such a day if b bring a action upon the case upon this assumpsit  and declare upon these two promise although the consideration of the S be not  perform yet the action do well lie but if they be collateral consideration  which be not pursuant as if I in consideration that you be of my counsel and  shall ride with I to York promise to give to you in this case all the  consideration ought to be prove otherwise the action Leonard can be maintain  so in our case the consideration be collateral and therefore they ought to be  prove and afterward judgement be give for the plaintiff cro Len hill and  Elizabeth in the common plead