case WAKEFIELD against HODGESON and other a fine of a tenement in Goldenlane  be good without other description and if the conusee die before the  proclamation the heir may cause they to he make and if he plead to part and  attorns for the residue it may be engross for the whole error to reverse a  fine the fine be levy of a reversion of diverse tenement in London in  Goldenlane the conusee bring a quid law proclaim and hang that die the heir  croak Elizabeth bring a new quid law proclaim and the defendant in part claim  fee and for the other be ready to attorn a and the plaintiff accept thereof  and to the remainder it be award that the defendant eat ind without die and  the fine be en rossed and the proclamation make the first error assign be for  that the conusee only be to have the election whether he will levy the fine  with proclamation or not and he be dead the fine ought not to he with  proclamation at the heir suit as dyer S but all the court resolve to the  contrary for the heir have as well election to have it with proclamation as  the ancestor for it be for his benefit and the statute do not a see will and  mary Q S a see Elizabeth c and Ann c croak Elizabeth er p restrain it and the  reason of the case in Dyerj why the proclamation there make wem stay be  because a formedon be depend and that be only in the discretion of the court a  second error assign be because the judgement in the quid law clamal be that  the fine he engross for part only but here it be engross for the whole but the  court resolve it be well enough for the bring of the quidjuris proclaim be not  material for the conusee may have have the fine engross without sue a  quidjuris proclaim and the sue thereof be only for his advantage for without  sue thereof he can not have have any attornment wherefore although the  judgement thereby be that the fine shall he engross for part yet the party if  he will may have all the fine engross and the proclamation in the time of the  heir after the engross be well enough a three error assign over as far as be  for that the fine be levy of tenement in Goldenlane in London and there be not  any will hamlet or parish mention say non allocatur for the court say that it  appear not unto they but that may be a will or hamlet and it may well be so  intend unless it have be so allege that the party may have answer thereto  wherefore the judgement be affirm