case Twisleton versus Griffith refer to fry v lane Ch d Eq can ab pl a son who  after his father death be a remainderman in tail sell this remainder at a  under rate court set aside the conveyance in a bill bring to set aside a sale  of a reversion the case appear to be that the plaintiff father be tenant for  life remainder to the plaintiff in tail remainder over to a three person that  the plaintiff the son have marry a wife with a small portion thereby incur his  father displeasure but upon the wife father advance pound for her portion the  father make a proportionable settlement and receive the son and his wife into  his house afterward the defendant have be a attorney though he have leave off  practice for a considerable time yet take upon he to advice and direct the  plaintiff in every thing and profess great friendship for he and after his  father be reconcile to he and when the plaintiff be in debt be desirous to  sell this reversion to his father who propose peer William give he pound for  the same the defendant by letter dissuade he from it declare that this be no  valuable consideration but in about a year afterward when the plaintiff father  be ancient and sickly and a very decline life the defendant himself buy this  reversion of the plaintiff for pound when the estate be worth pound per annum  and the plaintiff at this time be thirtyfour year of age and have a child  about ten year old who be inheritable to the entail and the plaintiff levy a  fine of this reversion to the defendant in about two year time the plaintiff  father die and upon the plaintiff bill to set aside this conveyance he in  order to gain a injunction by the direction of the court suffer a common  recovery and declare the use of it to the two senior six clerk subject to the  order of the court and now it be argue for the defendant that here be no fraud  in obtain this conveyance that the defendant run a hazard of lose his pound in  case the plaintiff have die without issue in the father lifetime and it appear  that the plaintiff himself buy a commission to go into the army and the child  be about ten year old be subject to many disease that may take he off as the  smallpox c and as the defendant run the hazard so he ought to have the benefit  thereof that if such a transaction as this be liable to be impeach afterward  in a court of equity it will be almost impracticable for a heir ever to sell a  reversion and that a purchase if fair make be not to be set aside mere for its  have turn out a good bargain peer William er p peer William but Lord  chancellor decree relief upon payment of principal and interest and full cost  ground his opinion chief upon the case of Bernee and Pitt vern one lend a heir  pound to pay pound if he survive his father else nothing equity relieve where  the plaintiff father be tenant for life of a considerable estate remainder in  tail to the plaintiff remainder over and the defendant lend the plaintiff the  two several sum of pound and pound upon which the plaintiff Bernee give two  judgement of pound apiece defeasanced each of they to pay pound in case the  plaintiff shall survive his father and to pay interest for the same in case he  shall marry in the life of his father but if he shall die in the life of his  father then the principal be to be lose this cause be first hear by Lord  Nottingham car who deny relief and after that the then plaintiff have be  constrain to pay the money videlicet pound upon the decree yet upon the rehear  before the Lord Jeffereys hill James his lordship do relieve declare that  these bargain be corrupt and fraudulent and tend to the destruction of heir  send to town for their education and to the utter ruin of family and that the  relief of the court ought to be extend to meet with such corrupt and  unconscionable practice accord Lord Cowper say this also be the case of a heir  and who be the less upon his guard with the defendant as he pretend nothing to  he but friendship by encourage he to leave his father house and dissuade he  from sell the reversion to his father for pound which be but pound less and  this a year before that the reason induce the Lord Jeffereyss decree be  probable peer William to discourage a grow practice of devour a heir on a  confidence in Lord nottingham decree but Lord Jeffereyss decree stand show  that every one think the same be just and that there be therefore no attempt  in parliament to reverse it his lordship add he see no inconvenience in the  objection that at this rate a heir without difficulty can not sell a reversion  this may force a heir to go home and submit to his father or to bite on the  bridle and endure some hardship and in the mean time he may grow wise and be  reclaim wherefore let the plaintiff be relieve on payment of principal  interest and full cost I mean liberal cost as to cost see gwynne v Heaton bro  c c Carwin v Millner June hill ms the plaintiff have borrow of the defendant  pound and give a bind and judgement to pay si on the death of his father or  father in law in case he survive either of they the father in law die four  month afterward and the plaintiff tender the defendant the pound and interest  which defendant refuse Lord chancellor king in consideration of the tender  refuse the defendant his cost so Bernee v Pitt vern Knott v Johnson ib wiseman  v beak ib coal v Gibbons post Vol III earl of Chesterfield v Jansen atk and  ves S c Barnardiston v Lingood atk gwynne v Heaton bro c c peacock v Evans Ves  gowland v de faria Ves Davis v Marlboro swan Carleton v Leighton mere Shelly v  Nash mad Bernal v Donegal dow Roche v obrien ba be Marsack v reeves mad fox v  wright ib III and see tweddell v tweddell Tur peer William de term S the  number three