case vernon versus Stephens Eq can ab pl a article to buy land and pay part of  the purchase money afterward he enter into several order of court to pay the  residue by such a day and in default thereof to give up the article and lose  what he have before pay court will relieve though these order have not be  comply with the plaintiff bring this bill for a specific performance of  article enter into b the defendant father Stephens to the plaintiff for sale  of the manor of Wheelock in Cheshire for pound and guinea there have arise  some difficulty about the title and the plaintiff insist that the same be not  good without a act of parliament the defendant father procure a act of  parliament upon which the plaintiff pay part of the money but make default in  payment of the residue the defendant father bring a bill to have the residue  of the money or to be discharge of the article peer William er p peer William  just before that bill be ready for hear the plaintiff and defendant father  enter into a order by consent sign by both party and recite the article by  which the plaintiff agree to pay the money by such a day or in default thereof  the article to be deliver up and cancel and the defendant father to hold the  premise discharge of the article then the plaintiff pay pound in art but make  default in payment of the residue and enter into another order by consent sign  by both party whereby a further day be give when if the money be not pay the  plaintiff agree to lose all the money which he have advance before and to lose  the benefit of the article which be to be put into the hand of Mr Cox the  counsel and deliver over to the defendant father in default of payment and in  case of such default the defendant father to hold the premise discharge of the  article the plaintiff Vernon have again make default now bring this bill to  have the purchase complete on payment of what be due with interest and to be  relieve against these order Lord chancellor here have be solemn agreement that  ought not slight to be get over but however if the defendant have his money  interest and cost he will have no reason to complain of have suffer on the  contrary it will be a very great hardship on the plaintiff to lose all the  money which he have pay lapse of time in payment may be recompense with  interest and cost and as to these agreement they be only intend as a security  for payment of the money which end be answer by the payment of principal  interest and cost peer William in when the money be to have be pay there be a  great scarcity of money they in who hand it be lock it up also at that time  the defendant father be dead which be the act of God and his executor not act  it be some time before the defendant take out administration with the will  annex of his father which be the default of the party so that the plaintiff  payment of the money at the exact time be dispense with let the plaintiff be  relieve upon payment of principal interest and cost but see Mackreth v Marlar  Cox approve in broom v monk Ves Lowther v lady Andover bro c c ex part hunter  Ves Steadman v Lord Galloway Sugden vendor that Edit Hudson v Bartram mad  Reynolds v Nelson mad Morse v mere mad