BOCKENHAM versus thacker post in a action upon the case the plaintiff declare  that I S be indebt in a sum of money to the plaintiff not exceed and that the  defendant as he the defendant say be indebt to I S in or thereabouts that the  defendant in consideration that the plaintiff at his request will procure a  order from I S in write to the defendant for payment of the money which the  defendant owe I S or any part thereof to the plaintiff he promise to pay the  money accord to such order the plaintiff aver that be procure such order from  I S for the defendant to pay he which he show to the defendant and the  defendant refuse to pay c the defendant demurrer general to the declaration  levinz for the defendant argue that it be not sufficient set forth that the  defendant be indebt to I S and if not there be no consideration cur contra for  it must be intend that he be indebt for it be set forth that the defendant say  so but if not the procure the note at the defendant request by the plaintiff  be a sufficient consideration it be object further that the plaintiff have not  allege that be procure the note at the request of the defendant as the  agreement be and for that Leon be cite in consideration that he shall repair  such part of a house at his request it be hold nought for not lie the repair  to be do at request say non allocatur for it shall be intend to have be do at  request and so be Bretton and bolton case cro cro Berisfords case and Pqjnters  case cro say notam all those case be after verdict and so be the above cite  case see more of this case afterward fol Ventris boundary consecrated  michaelis year W m in common banc sergeant trinder move the court to set aside  a verdict recover in a action for the mesne profit after a recovery in a  ejectment show that the defendant in the ejectment have bring another  ejectment since and recover so that the first recovery be disaffirmed and  therefore there ought to have be no recovery for the mesne profit but the  motion be deny by the whole court