a s father be tenant for life remainder to a in tail remainder over a have  incur his father be displeasure be advice by b the defendant who have be a  attorney and who pretend great friendship for he and after a s father have be  reconcile to he and a be in debt and the father offer to give he pound for  this reversion he be dissuade by b from accept the father be offer b declare  that this be no valuable consideration but in about a year afterward when a s  father be ancient and sickly and in a very decline life b buy this reversion  of a for pound when the estate be worth pound per annum and a at this time be  thirtyfour year of age and have a child about ten year old who be inheritable  to the entail and a levy a fine of this reversion to b about two year after  a s father die and upon a s bill to set aside this be conveyance he in order  to gain a injunction by the direction of the court suffer a recovery and  declare the use of it to the two senior six clerk subject to the order of the  court and Lord Chan Cowper direct a to be relieve on payment of principal  interest and full cost but his lordship say he mean liberal cost east  Twisleton and Griffith will Rep ibidem his lordship say he ground his opinion  for relief chief upon the case of Bernee and Pitt vern equity case abridge er  p where the plaintiff father be tenant for life of a considerable estate  remainder in tail to the plaintiff remainder over and the defendant lend  plaintiff the two several sum of pound and pound upon which plaintiff give two  judgement of pound apiece defeazanced each of they to pay pound in case the  plaintiff shall survive his father and to pay interest for the same but if he  shall die in the lifetime of his father then the principal be to be lose this  Cause be hear car by Lord Nottingham who deny relief and after that the then  plaintiff have be constrain to pay the money videlicet pound upon the decree  yet upon the rehear hill James Lord Jeffereys do relieve declare that these  bargain be corrupt and fraudulent and tend to the destruction of heir send to  town for their education and to the utter ruin of family and that the relief  of the court ought to be extend to meet with such corrupt bargain and  unconscionable practice and accord Lord Cowper in the present case say this  also be in the case of a heir and who be the less upon his Guard with b as he  pretend nothing to he but friendship by encourage he to leave his father be  house and dissuade he from sell the reversion to his rather for pound which be  but pound less andthat a year before that the reason induce Lord Jeffereyss  decree be probable to discourage a grow practice of devour a heir on a  confidence on Lord nottingham decree but Lord Jeffereyss decree stand show  that every one think the same very just and that there be therefore no attempt  in parliament to reverse it and his lordship say he see no inconvenience in  the objection that at this rate a heir without difficulty can not sell a  reversion for this may force a heir to go home and submit to his father or to  bite on the bridle and endure some hardship and in the mean time he may grow  wise and be reclaim ibidem vide will Rep c d