case long versus Clopton eoden die if a heir or any other buy in a encumbrance  he shall not be allow as against a purchaser any more than he real pay for  such encumbrance ante case on a master special report to who the account in  question be refer to be take it be determine by the court that a heir or any  other shall not as against a real purchaser be allow more on any encumbrance  buy in than what he actual pay for the same without regard to what be real due  on such encumbrance and that where a prior encumbrancer buy in a subsequent  encumbrance with notice of a intervene security he shall not be allow the same  and the case of borough and Frances be cite vide darcy v hall ante brathwaite  v brathwaite ante Phillips v Vaughan ante William v Springfield post ascough v  Johnson ux post vol and case there respective cite the case by the register  book appear to have be that a bill be exhibit against the defendant as heir of  his father against who a judgement have be obtain to discover the real and  personal estate of his say father liable thereto and for a account of profit  of the say estate and that at the hear a account be direct of what have be  receive and pay for precede encumbrance for principal and interest and for  charge in defence of the title and defendant have compound several encumbrance  the court reserve the matter whether defendant shall have the benefit and it  be agree that the encumbrance be particular and charge on several part of the  estate some of which estate be of far eater value than the money lend thereon  over and beside all general security that effect the same plaintiff ought to  be admit to a redemption to such particular estate as he shall think fit and  not be bind to redeem the whole and the decree be that the defendant though he  be a heir yet ought not to be allow the benefit of composition to the  prejudice of plaintiff debt but ought to be allow what he have real pay for  principal interest and charge as well on account of encumbrance precedent to  plaintiff judgement as subsequent till he have notice of say plaintiff  judgement and that plaintiff ought not to be admit to a redemption of any part  of the estate without redeem the whole and pay what shall appear to be due to  defendant upon the account and as to the account Lord chancellor declare that  defendant be charge with the rend of the land for the time he hold it ought to  be allow tax repair and all incidental charge annual and the cost and charge  he have be put unto in relation to the title of the premise and that defendant  ought not to be charge with any rend or profit while any of the encumbrancer  be in possession of the premise or with any more than he raise or receive out  of say estate Reg lib b fol