case lady Dacres versus chute eoden die in court Lord keeper Ch Rep Cas  sequestrator have by virtue of a order power to fall timber they fall timber  to the value of pound and pay over but pound to the plaintiff for who benefit  the sequestration be take out plaintiff not Chargeable with more than the  pound the lady Dacres by agreement make on her marriage with the defendant  grandfather be to have a jointure of pound per annum or pound in money she  elect the pound in money and have a decree for it and the sequestration of the  defendant land and a writ of assistance to put her in possession and a decree  be make against the defendant then a infant vide leg v turnbull p wms for  maintenance to be allow his young brother and sister and this be to be pay out  of the sequester estate upon a appeal the house of lord reverse this decree as  to the maintenance which have be pay to the lady Dacres and which she have  apply to the maintenance of the child and now the cause come back to the court  to have the account take of what the lady her agent or any under her have  receive out of this estate the Lord keeper upon the account allow the  principal sum pay for maintenance towards the sink of the lady Dacres debt but  will not let they be apply at the time they be pay but in one entire sum at  the end of the account and so strike off all the interest for above sixteen  year which come to more than the principal say that this be a hard case and  damage be in the power of the court in this case the sequestrator have power  by order of the court to fall timber and it appear by proof in the cause that  the real value of the timber take by they off this estate amount unto pound  and but pound have be bring to account and for as much as it do not appear  that the lady Dacres have receive more than pound on account of the timber the  Lord keeper will not charge her further save the sequestrator be the officer  and agent of the court and man must take care to pay their debt at their peril  though the defendant be all this time a infant Reg lib a fol but this point as  to sequestrator do not appear it come on upon exception to the master report  for that in take the account the master ought to have charge the plaintiff  with a sum of pound for timber cut from the estate in question over and above  the sum of pound allow upon the say account as pay the plaintiff by one Owen  his agent but it appear to the court that the proof of the defendant be  extravagant represent value and estimate make long after the wood be dispose  of and upon the memory and opinion of witness as well as their credit and  therefore can not be set in the balance with account take at the time and it  not appear that there be any fraud or undersell nor any more money receive  than be place to account neither be Owen the plaintiff agent in the management  of the wood but the guardian of the infant defendant may have allow his  account whether the plaintiff will or no and in case there have be any  overvalue or mismanagement which have not appear Owen ought to be therefore  Chargeable and not the plaintiff the exception be overrule