case tne queen against drury if a countess retain two chaplain and afterward  retaina three this three chaplain can hold a plurality by licence and  dispensation within the Henry c until one of the other two be advance post   b  more hob upon demurrer the case be the countess of ken have retain two  chaplain and afterward take a three chaplain and the three obtain a licence  and dispensation to retain a second henefice and take it accord and whether he  be such a chaplain as may obtain a plurality by the Henry c because the other  two chaplain be not advance be the question croak Elizabeth Walmsley hold that  he be because the statute restrain not the numher croak Elizabeth er p of  chaplain which a countess may have but the numher who be to have qualification  so he who first obtain the qualification to a henefice shall retain it and the  archbishop when he make a dispensation examine not who be first retain but who  be most worthy and he will dispense but with two so they who first obtain a  henefice by dispensation shall retain it and the retain of his lord or  countess confer nothing upon he but enable he only to the obtain of a  dispensation and sodden Elizabeth dyer and hear sergeant say that it be so  resolve in the queen bench in the case of lady bridge in a information  wherefore c and to that opinion Anderson and Kingsmil first incline but  Glanville contra because the statute show what person shall he enable to take  benefice by dispensation videlicet the king child or those of his Council or  the child of nobleman c which be by reason of the dignity of their person so  of doctor or bachelor of divinity c which be ky reason of their dignity and  then follow that countess c shall have two chaplain whomay obtain dispensation  c which be as much as to say that they be person of nified to have this  privilege hein chaplain S to such noble person whereby it be necessary to be  intend that none but they two be to have that dignity and when she have  advance two who have that privilege to take a second benefice when they will  by dispensation that privilege can be take from they as long as they remain  her chaplain and the retain of a three be more that the statute allow and  therefore he shall not have the benefit of that statute and a precedent of one  Skifilings easter term Elizabeth roll which be adjudge in the point and  another Elizabeth roll where issue be take b rule of court that he be the  first chaplain retain and easter term Elizabeth roll hetween archer and  Conquest where the same issue be take whereupon Anderson and Kingsmil change  their opinion and agree with Glanville that this three chaplain be not to have  benefit of this statute to obtain a dispensation wherefore it be adjudge for  the queen a   b