bold case verdict general or special may be amend by the clerk note in civil  case but not in criminal ante pl   cro car hob roll Rep light Rep ante pl  Wilson a verdict general or special may be amend by the note in the book of  the clerk of assize if there be a misprision but this be to be intend in civil  and not in criminal case vide Keil cro in assumpsit defendant plead payment  for part and non assumpsit for the rest and the jury find for both quod non  assumpsit whereas for one it shall be non to loosen and the record be deliver  to the clerk of the assize to amend because it be his misprision it appear the  jury find both issue for the plaintiff cro cro car   cro a special verdict  have be amend by the note of counsel in the entry and that after a writ of  error bring for per cur it be but what be find and we may amend here what they  may in Com banc a notam amendment shall not be make after the court can help  see that the matter be upon record as give leave to withdraw a demurrer and  plead to issue after other issue join in the same cause have be try and  verdict form with contingent damage for the whole must be suppose to be still  in paper burr way t r t r a in Newcombe v green Str a verdict be amend by the  judge note the officer have enter S damage instead of in may v archer Str a  when de nov be move for on affidavit that certain material fact not state in  the special verdict be prove at the trial but the court direct the verdict to  be amend in Eddawes v Hopkins Doug a declaration consist of several count and  after a general verdict a motion in arrest of judgement be make on the ground  of their inconsistency the court allow the postea to be amend by the judge  note and apply to particular count Lord Mansfield mention the case of one  Gibson who be convict of robbery and a mistake be discover in the verdict it  be on consultation with all the judge correct from minute sign by the jury and  the prisoner execute buller I say if there be only evidence on the good and  consistent count the verdict may be amend by the judge note otherwise if there  be any evidence applicable to the other count verdict amend in b r by apply  damage to a particular count accord to the judge note after error bring in the  house of lord and a assignment for error that the count ought not to be join  and a day for argument appoint in the house of lord Petrie v hannay t r  plaintiff Q can after apply a general verdict to one count upon that appear  insufficient resort to another Holloway v Bennett t r in Cogan v ebden burr  the court be of opinion that a verdict may be amend on the affidavit of eight  of the jury that it be give contrary to their intention by mistake of the  foreman and it appear on the judge report that the weight of evidence accord  with their intention vide will Doug burr t r Lord Mansfield observe in the  case of Alder v Chip burr that the court have not use the same strictness of  late year with regard to amendment as they former do and it be much better for  the party that they shall not however the court will always take care that if  one party obtain leave to amend the other will not be prejudice or delay  thereby in that case the plaintiff have by mistake of his former attorney  traverse a lease under which he claim and have leave to withdraw his  replication and reply de to make new Salkeld er p Salkeld amerciament and fine