case hussey and his wife against lady Dillon and other that may devise to  grandchild greatgrandchildren hold under the circumstance to take but hold the  devise do not extend to grandchild by marriage see Wythe v Thurlston Amb  Falkner v butler Amb gale v Bennett Amb lib Reg a foe S c Cox ms king king  Eden nom Hussey v Berkeley S c serjeant hill ms lady tyrconnel have several  grandchild and greatgrandchildren and by her will that may inter alian give  lady Netterville and her sister mrs Hussey who be two of her grandchild pound  each to buy they ring and desire Lord Berkeley her executor to pay and dispose  of the residue of her personal estate to such person and in such manner as she  shall by write under her hand direct and appoint and by a codicil in nature of  a letter of the same date with her will she give legacy to several of her  greatgrandchildren and to lady Dillon who be the widow of her grandson Lord  Dillon and direct that the pound give to lady Netterville and mrs Hussey shall  be pay out of her effect in Ireland she give to miss Hussey her Indian screen  with all her china in London and in another place she give the china in a  small Indian trunk as well as the china in the other chest to her  granddaughter miss Hussey and if her effect shall prove to be more than she  have already give away she desire it may be divide among her grandchild name  therein three question be it whether mrs Hussey the plaintiff wife who be  granddaughter of the testatrix or her old daughter be the person mean by the  description in the will of miss Hussey ambler d whether the greatgrandchildren  shall take a share of the residue under the description of grandchild d  whether lady Dillon who be only a grandchild by marriage shall take under that  description as to the let question it be say that the testatrix use to call  mrs Hussey by the title of miss and several letter from the testatrix be  produce which be direct to miss Hussey and which it be say it appear from the  content to have be send to mrs Hussey but they be not satisfactory to the  court on the d question the case of crook v vern be cite where it be hold that  in case of a trust for the child of a and a have one child and several  grandchild the latter shall not take any share Lord Henley chancellor as to  the saint I be of opinion that the testatrix mean the greatgranddaughter by  the description of miss Hussey she have make use of the expression mrs Hussey  in the codicil which show she mean distinct person the letter determine  nothing as to the d question I admit the case of crook v the word child mean  those in the degree of relationship in the first descent grandchild be a word  of large extent and in common parlance take in every body descend from the  testator and will have that effect unless the intention appear to the contrary  in this case she have call the greatgranddaughter miss Hussey by the  description of granddaughter which be decisive of the question as to the d  there be no colour to say lady Dillon be to be consider as a grandchild she be  so only by marriage the testatrix mean such as be her grandchild by blood  ambler er p