case sir John Ratcliff against davies Hilary term James roll see Donald v  suckling lr Q b if good be pawn and no particular day of redemption agree the  owner may redeem they at any time the delivery of good pledge by the wife of a  pawnee to a stranger passes no interest in they though do with her husband  consent tender of the money to the executrix of a pawnee and her refusal to  restore the good revests they in the owner action of trover and conversion of  a hatband set with pearl and diamond upon not guilty plead a special verdict  be find that the plaintiff be possess thereof and pawn it to John Whitlock for  twentyfive pound but no certain time appoint for the redemption thereof that  Whitlock be sick his wife in presence and with his assent deliver it to the  defendant and afterward he make his say wife his executrix and die who prove  the will that the plaintiff tender to the say executrix the say twentyfive  pound who refuse and afterward demand the hatband of the defendant who refuse  to deliver it but convert it to his own use in this case three point be move  first there be no time appoint for the redemption whether it may be make after  the death of he to who it be pawn or ought to be in the life of both the  parties?And all the justice resolve it may be well make after the death of he  to who it be pledge but not after the death of he who pledge it Yelverton and  croak doub ed and hold that it croak throw can not for he at his peril ought  to redeem it in his time as it be upon a mortgage but Fleming and the other  against it for pledge do not make a absolute property but it be a delivery  only until he pay c so it be a debt to the one and a retainer of the thing to  the other for which there may be a redemand at any time upon the payment of  the money for the pledge deliver be but as security for his money lend so as  he who borrow the money be to have again his pledge when he repay it and his  tender give he interest therein and there be difference between a mortgage of  land and pledge of good for the mortgagee have a absolute interest in the land  but the other have but a special property in the good to detain they for his  security Henry pl Edward pl Edward bar second it be resolve that by this  delivery of the say good by the wife with the assent of her husband to the  defendant there pass no interest of they to the defendant but as it be a  custody only and therefore the tender of the redemption ought to be make to  the executrix and not to the defendant three that when he tender the money to  the executrix and she refuse it be as good as payment and the special property  of the good be revested in the plaintiff then when he demand they of the  defendant and he refuse to deliver they but convert they to his own use a  trover and conversion well lie although he come to they by a lawful delivery  and not by trover Wherefore it be adjudge for the plaintiff