case lane versus williams all Nov Rawlinson Hutchins lord commissioner Eq can  ab b pl S c a and b partner as woollendraper a borrow money of c and give a  note for the same for himself and partner though this money be not bring into  partnership nor the note give with the privity of the other partner yet hold  per cur that this will bind the other partner post case I S and defendant  williams testator be partner as woollendraper I S give a note to the plaintiff  Vernon chancery case for receive and borrow of he which he promise to repay  and subscribe it for himself and partner the bill be for a discovery and  satisfaction out of the asset against William the executor of the survive  partner to oblige he to pay it be insist for the defendant at the roll that  this money be never bring into trade nor be contract upon the account of the  partnership Vernon chancery case er p and therefore although one partner sign  it as for himself and partner that can not bind the partner that be not privy  nor consent thereunto and the master of the roll dismiss the bill with cost  vide post S c now upon a appeal the court declare they take it that both  partner be bind but the note be of pretty long stand therefore order the  defendant to admit asset in a action at law to be bring and not plead the  statute of limitation otherwise will decree for the plaintiff the note be of  rather more than a year stand and the defendant William have receive from the  other partner a bind of indemnity against all demand relate to the say  partnership and the decree be that Richard Newberry and the defendant williams  intestate be partner at the time of borrow the money and give the note in  question and the say money be lend on the credit of such partnership that  either of the say partner be liable to pay the same and the rather for that  the defendant William take such bind from Newberry as aforesaid and therefore  that the defendant William do pay to the plaintiff the say pound which be the  money lend and not and interest from the date of the note discount what have  be pay he in part of the say debt and what be due from plaintiff to the  copartnership and it be refer to the master to take the account c Reg lib t b  fol it be clear that the law of merchant be part of the law of the land and  that in mercantile transaction one partner may bind the rest style Pinkney v  hall salk raym S c Harrison v Jackson term Rep but not by deed ibidem unless  under pi particular power per Lord Kenyon ibidem it seem however that one  partner may bind the rest by deed or bind if execute in the presence of the  other ball v Dunsterville term Rep burn v burn Ves how far to make a  partnership liable in respect of a separate transaction with one partner a  express agreement must appear vide sheriff v Wilks east Rep ex part needle Ves  and in a late case of William v Bingley not report on motion for injunction  against partner accept or negotiate bill of exchange c for or in the name of  the partnership Eldon Lord chancellor grant the injunction except so far as  the same shall be give or negotiate by such partner for the purpose of the  partnership