coke b Lovedays case mich James on a information for usury if the verdict find  the corrupt agreement but say nothing as to the loan it be bad when a jury  return by force of any venire facias to try a issue have give a verdict which  be accept and record by the court be it perfect or imperfect the juror be  discharge thereof for ever and shall never be call back in the same cause to  try the same issue but if the verdict be so imperfect that judgement can be  give upon it then the court shall award a venire facias de to make new S c cro  James jenk Vid the entry   Ent nu in a information in the exchequer upon the  statute of usury by c who tam c against Loveday the defendant plead to issue  and a jury be return who give a imperfect verdict for they find a acceptance c  and no a bridge Q the case of Oldfield and Lycett in c b mich Geo where the  plaintiff be nonsuit bring error after a case make at nisi prius for the  opinion of the court which be for defendant so judgement of nonsuit enter by  order of nisi prius note to former edition a a venire de to make new be also  grantable where the jury be improper choose or where there be any irregularity  in return they or where they have improper conduct themselves also where the  declaration consist of several count and the jury give several damage and it  afterward appear that one of they be defective as also upon a demurrer to  evidence Vid note to Davies v price TR a venire de to make new be also  grantable where the jury find less than the whole matter in issue as also  where they omit assess the damage Kynaston v mayor c of Shrewsbury strange  Eichorn v Le maitre will drage v brand will a venire de to make new may also  be grant by a court of error as also after a bill of exception bend v baker TR  Lucerne v Crawford n r Harwood v Goodright Cowp but in Trevor v wall TR street  v Hopkinson strange the court refuse a venire facias de to make new after  error from another court Vid Tidds practice vol that edit do v jersey barn and  Cress by statute Geo c if the plaintiff or defendant in quare hinder or  replevin after issue process do not proceed to trial at the first assize he  may sue a venire facias de to make new but if the jury be discharge at the  assize in order to have a view there be no need of a venire de to make new Com  Rep S c strange Vid stat Geo c and in Davy v Hobson taunt where a person not  summon on the jury be swear at nisi prius in the name of a person for who a  summons to serve on that jury be deliver and to who house he have succeed the  irregularity be notice before verdict the court of common plea award a venire  de to make new Vid note a Codwells case   a a bridge Q the case of Oldfield  and Lycett in c b mich Geo where the plaintiff be nonsuit bring error after a  case make at nisi prius for the opinion of the court which be for defendant so  judgement of nonsuit enter by order of nisi prius note to former edition a  loan c wherefore the court award a venire facias de to make new and thereupon  another jury be return and appear and when they be ready to give their verdict  the plaintiff be nonsuit upon which judgement be give and now the plaintiff  bring a writ of error in the exchequer Chamber and assign for error that the  court of exchequer in the say case do err in grant a venire facias de to make  new but ought to have grant a new nisi prius for a imperfect verdict be as no  verdict as year Edward a a insufficient indictment be as no indictment and at  the commonlaw if the recognitors of a assize give a verdict which be not well  examine by the justice who take the assize but be imperfect for want of good  examination in that case the plaintiff shall have a certificate of assize and  the first imperfection shall be inquire by the first juror and that appear in  f n b b h a assize pl h and the word of the writ be because super a certain  point of time contingent assisam nome disseizince c qudam subsu doubt c but it  be resolve by the court and the two chief justice that the venire facias de to  make new be well award for when a jury return by force of any venire facias to  try a issue have give a verdict which be accept and record by the court be it  perfect or imperfect the juror be discharge thereof for ever and shall never  be call back in the same cause to try the same issue but if the verdict be so  imperfect that judgement can be give coke a upon it then the court shall award  a venire facias de to make new a a venire de to make new be also grantable  where the jury be improper choose or where there be any irregularity in return  they or where they have improper conduct themselves also where the declaration  consist of several count and the jury give several damage and it afterward  appear that one of they be defective as also upon a demurrer to evidence Vid  note to Davies v price TR a venire de to make new be also grantable where the  jury find less than the whole matter in issue as also where they omit assess  the damage Kynaston v mayor c of Shrewsbury strange Eichorn v Le maitre will  drage v brand will a venire de to make new may also be grant by a court of  error as also after a bill of exception bend v baker TR Lucerne v Crawford n r  Harwood v Goodright Cowp but in Trevor v wall TR street v Hopkinson strange  the court refuse a venire facias de to make new after error from another court  Vid Tidds practice vol that edit do v jersey barn and Cress by statute Geo c  if the plaintiff or defendant in quare hinder or replevin after issue process  do not proceed to trial at the first assize he may sue a venire facias de to  make new but if the jury be discharge at the assize in order to have a view  there be no need of a venire de to make new Com Rep S c strange Vid stat Geo c  and in Davy v Hobson taunt where a person not summon on the jury be swear at  nisi prius in the name of a person for who a summons to serve on that jury be  deliver and to who house he have succeed the irregularity be notice before  verdict the court of common plea award a venire de to make new Vid note a  Codwells case   a a to try coke report b er p the say issue by other b Acc b  and c b and therewith agree the book in Edward b where it be resolve that in a  cessavit because the inquest find part to be hold of the demandant and find  not by what service it be hold nor what arrearage be behind and for that  reason be not full take that a venire facias de to make new shall be award to  return a new jury and not a new nisi prius to try the same issue again by the  same jury so in a Fitzherbert process Br replead Br venire facias a h a b in  conspiracy against diverse all plead not guilty and one venire facias be award  against all and the sheriff return not the writ and the sheriff pray several  venire facias against the defendant and have it and it be find for the  plaintiff and all the justice adjudge it a jeofail so that the plaintiff can  not have judgement upon the say verdict which be full find forasmuch as the  first award be of one joint venire the plaintiff can not vary to have several  writ de venire facias from the first award and therefore the court do award  venire facias de to make new Henry b Br enq b Edward b a and as to the case of  c Cr throw c assize the recognitors be not return to try any certain issue for  there be a jury the first day before any plaint plea or issue there no new  process can be award for the recognitors who be once return shall stand but  when a jury be return on a venire facias which be a judicial process for the  trial of a certain issue there the court if the verdict be imperfect may award  a new judicial process sure venire facias de to make new but the court can do  so in case of assize for they be return on the original and because the writ  of assize de to make new disseizina be d Ant a d es inum remedy the plaintiff  shall have a writ of certificate of assize to supply the first imperfection  which happen for default of good examination accord to the truth of the matter  and judgement be affirm