case anonymous Lord chancellor Talbot the court will not order the fill a  original to make good a judgement on error bring without some excuse for not  fill one before though a slender excuse may be sufficient a motion be make by  the attorneygeneral to discharge a order of the master of the roll for fill a  original nunc pro tune to make good a judgement after a writ of error bring on  the other side it be urge that a court of law and much more of equity ought to  favour any thing that tend to support a judgement which must be suppose to  have be obtain for a just demand and therefore at law if there be any mistake  in a writ of error to reverse a judgement let the mistake be never so trivial  yet it be to reverse a judgement the court will not amend it peer William Lord  chancellor though a slight excuse may be sufficient to induce I to make a  order for leave to the plaintiff to file a original nunc pro tune still some  excuse there ought to be otherwise no person will file a original until he  shall have be force to it by a writ of error see vol and this will be in a  manner to give away the small revenue of the crown upon original writ which  the king court ought not to peer William er p do and thereupon his lordship  discharge the master of the roll order for fill the say original the  consequence of which be that the judgement be reverse upon a writ of error  vide pengree v Jones bro c c the statute of h for the amendment of record be  exclusive of a writ of error that go more in reversal than in affirmance of a  judgement and the intent of the act be to support original judgement and to  avoid writ of error Carth but there be a further reason to be give why a writ  of error be in no case amendable because it be the commission to the court and  the court can amend their own commission see Salkeld Thompson v Crocker it may  be likewise observe as material to this purpose that after in nullo be erratum  plead the plaintiff in error can have a certiorari ex debt is owed justit and  as it be discretionary in the court they will award it in order to affirm but  never to reverse a judgement or make error salk Carlton v Mortagh