a by licence from king Henry grant certain land to the mayor c of g in trust  that whenever the lease make by her to p and b his wife shall determine that  they the mayor c will make a new lease to they the say p and b or to the heir  of the say b at any time on request on payment of mark and under the yearly  value of mark for the term of year with the same covenant c as in the old  lease and upon the expiration of the say term the mayor c be at any time on  the request of the heir of the wife to grant a new lease to they in the same  form the plaintiff and h Hoskins defendant Hoskinss father be coheir of b and  in Hoskins the father get a assignment from the plaintiff of his right for  pound consideration only when the land appear to be of the value of pound per  Ann therefore plaintiff bring his bill against defendant Hoskins son and  executor of say h Hoskins to set aside this assignment as obtain by fraud and  imposition by misinform the plaintiff of his right and against the mayor c to  have a lease make to plaintiff and defendant Hoskins as coheir to b and accord  to the covenant in the original lease the defendant by their answer  acknowledge that plaintiff and defendant h be coheir to b and that a make such  a grant c and that lease have be make of those land accord to the covenant in  the original lease that plaintiff for pound pay he by defendant father assign  all his right in the say lease to he and by another deed covenant that he  defendant father may make use of his name in take a new lease c and that his  name may be insert in such new lease in trust for defendant and that the city  accord make a new lease to defendant father accord to the covenant in the  original lease without name the plaintiff and defendant Hoskins and deny fraud  c the court set aside the assignment and decree a new lease to be make to the  plaintiff and to the heir of Hoskins the father accord to the covenant in the  original lease make by a and defendant Hoskins to account for a moiety of the  profit c during his father be life and since his death and to pay cost hill  Geo Evans v Hoskins and the city of Gloucester ms Rep Mod can in law and Eq SC  and decree say on read the proof it appear that there be no more than pound  pay to plaintiff as a consideration for say assignment and that the benefit  thereof be worth more than pound per Ann to Hoskins the father and that twelve  year of the old lease be unexpired at the time the plaintiff execute this  assignment and that it appear by a letter which be prove to be write by  defendant Hoskinss father to plaintiff purport that he and the plaintiff be to  pay pound to the city for a fine on renew the lease when they be to pay only  mark and no more and all that the defendant Hoskins prove be that the land be  not of so great a value at the time of the assignment as they be now and that  the city insist on pound fine which be true but the reason be because Hoskins  the father will have a lease make to he exclusive of the plaintiff ibidem