case hewet versus Ireland see barn v Jennings l r Eq lock v Dunlop Ch d Lord  chancellor Parker pale yellow Rep Eq can ab pl pre Charles provision for  daughter to be bear shall extend to daughter then beget husband and wife have  issue a daughter and a provision be make by deed and fine out of the estate of  the wife after marriage for secure pound in trust that she shall peer William  er p have the interest during her life and afterward in trust that the shall  be pay to such daughter or daughter as shall be beget by the husband on the  wife such payment to be make at their age of eighteen or marriage which shall  first happen the interest in the mean time to go for maintenance and if no  such daughter then to the husband the fact happen to be that at the time of  the execute of this deed there be a daughter of the marriage about ten year of  age and no daughter bear afterward and the mother soon after die peer William  whereupon it be object that the daughter bear before the make of this deed c  shall not take because it be say such daughter as shall be beget which be word  of futurity Lord chancellor the parent can never intend to neglect a daughter  which be bear and yet so young as not to be capable of offend they videlicet  be but ten year old and at the same time to take care of a daughter to be bear  and which may never be bear and in fact never be for which reason if the word  can bear any interpretation the daughter bear before shall take beside as  bring into existence take in child to be beget and to bring forth include  child then beget I Inst b vern pre Charles ante in long v Beaumont and gore v  core post Vol two and as the word use here seem only to be mean for the word  beget or to be beget I be of opinion that this daughter though bear before  shall take also the word which shall be beget shall relate to the death of the  wife and then the daughter bear before be include under that description it be  like the case in cro car see this case cite ante Kentish v Newman and cite by  Lord c I hate in vent where a man devise to his old son and the heir of his  body after the death of his wife and if he die live the wife then to the  testator second son and the heir of his body the first son die live the wife  but leave issue and it be strong urge that his estate shall cease for that it  be say if he die live the wife this explain what go before but it be rule by  all the court that it be a absolute estate tail in the old son and as if the  word have be if he die without issue live the wife for the father can not be  think to intend to prefer a young son before the issue of his old and the peer  William construction contend for in the present case will be equal  unreasonable so Hebblethwaite v Cartwright can tempt Talb and see Burdet v  hopegood post do v Hallett m S Wilkinson v Adam v b Trower v butt S S