case martin against monk if a nisi prius roll state the issue to be before the  lord the king and lady the queen when in fact the queen at the time be dead or  if it misstate the day on which the assize be hold it can be amend although  the plea roll be right motion to amend a fault in the to swear falsely after  verdict find for the plaintiff at the assize in Sussex it be nomina a swearer  between the plaintiff and defendant de plea c modern er p to put down in  looking back in person dom Reg et dom queen at westm c nisi justiciar c ad  assisas capiend assign prius die c fivepercent tax die of Mars it shall have  be in person lord ring only and the day of nisi prius be mistake for the  assize be the twentythird of march the record be right by which he pray it to  be amend and for authority the case of merchant v reason Le merchant v Rawson  cro car roll ab pl a be cite where the record be de plea debt is owed upon the  statute Edward c for not set out tithe and the to swear falsely in the record  of nisi prius be de plea transgression and this be amend after a verdict for  the plaintiff because it be only a misprision of the clerk so where it be upon  a nisi prius that challenge be make to the sheriff after issue joinedMusgrave  v wharton cro James see also Fowlis v child cro James and Aquila week case cro  car palm godb b and venire facias award to the coroner but the record be that  the venire facias be award unto the sheriff which be not enter at the time  modern of the trial but be usual make up afterward in time of vacation yet  this be only a misprision of the clerk shall be amend by the record but on the  other side it be insist that this be not amendable for the justice of nisi  prius have no authority to take such a record the misprision of a clerk in a  writ of nisi prius be amendable by the statute of Henry c but then it must  have sufficient matter express or imply to give authority to the judge to try  the issue for without that writ he can try the cause and therefore in debt a  Le merchant v Rawson cro car roll ab pl blackmore case   c against the  defendant husbandman the question be whether he be so die impetrationis short  catalog and the writ of nisi prius by which the cause be try take notice that  the defendant be a husbandman but the material part of the issue be leave out  videlicet whether he be so die impetrationis short catalog or not there be a  verdict for the plaintiff and though the record be right the court will not  suffer the writ of nisi prius to be amend yearbook Henry pl a because by that  writ the judge have no power to try the issue in the record in all the case  where the record of nisi prius have be amend by the roll the writ of distringa  have be right which together with the nisi prius be a sufficient authority for  the judge to try the cause   Carth salk post Bac Abr b but here the distringa  be wrong for it be gulielmus et maria God agreeableness c which can not be for  the queen die in December and the cause be try the twentythird of march follow  for which reason the court hold this not amendable