CANDICT and PLOMERS case the parishioner have use time out of memory of man c  to choose the parish clark of the church of saint augustines in Canterbury d  the old clark be dead they choose a new clark and the parson by force of a new  canon choose another man for the clark upon which the clark choose by the  parishioner be sue in the spiritual court and he have a prohibition and  afterward he be sue again in the spiritual court for set of the bread upon the  communion table and for sing in another tune then the parishioner and the  other clark do and be deprive by lgei tense there Haughton sergeant move for a  prohibition and say that although the last suit in the spiritual court be not  direct for the use of the office of clark yet by the matter contain in the  lihell it be draw in question whether he be lawful clark or not and therefore  pray a prohibition cook you shall have a prohibition for the canon be against  the commonlaw for particular custom be part of the commonlaw and say that the  canon law will not endure gunshot and he say that by the suit in the spiritual  court the will examine whether hewere a lawful clark of not for if he he a  lawful clark then he have good authority to set the bread upon the communion  table Haugliton but what shall we do for we be deprive by sentence give there  cook there be no question but that the prohibition lie notwithstanding the  sentence there and for the deprivation it be mere void for the clerkship be  lie office and may he execute by a lie man and therefore the ordinary have no  power to deprive he but he may have a action as clark notwithstanding the  deprivation for so be the book in ass for a hospital and I wish that a  information he draw against they for hold plea of a thing which be a mere lie  thing as it be in temps h Br case walmesley justice the office be lie and the  deprivation by the ordinary be void for he can deprive he because he have  nothing to do in the election and a prohibition be grant at another day the  case be move again and the court be of the same opinion that the clark can not  he deprive because the clerkship be a lie office and e title annuity be cite  and e where a formedon be bring of the office of serjeancy of the church of l  but cook say the same day in another case which be move in court and give it  for a rule that after sentence give in the spiritual court Godbolt he will not  grant a prohibition if there be not matter apparent within the proceedings for  I will not allow that the party shall to have a prohibition show alley thing  not ground on the sentence to have a prohibition because he have admit Godbolt  er p of the jurisdic cion and there be no reason for he to try if the  spiritual court will help he and afterward at the commonlaw to sue forth a  prohibition all which be agree by the whole court