bridget Dennis by sir alexander Frazer her committee against sir thomas bad  Frances Dennis his daughter and other January see Winchelsea earl of v  norcliffe vern Awdley v Awdley vern a infant estate in his guardian hand apply  to payment of his debt the case of sir Thomas Badd be that he be guardian to  Edward Dennis who sister and heir the plaintiff be and at fifteen year of age  marry he to the defendant Frances his daughter sir Robert Dillington have a  mortgage of pound of part of the infant estate which mortgage sir Thomas Badd  pay off and take the sameassigned to other person the infant after at  seventeen year of age make his will and the defendant Frances his wife  executrix the bill be that though sir Thomas Badd have aid off the mortgage  with the infant own money yet he now pretend it be not for the benefit of the  infant but that he pay it with his own money and for what money he have of the  infant he be Accountable to his own daughter the executrix and so will leave  the whole mortgagemoney still on the mortgage land which belong to the  plaintiff as sister and heir to the infant case in chancery the defendant sir  Thomas Badd by answer say that the money he have id sir rob Dillington be his  own money and that he have not near enough of the infant to pay the same and  that if he have have enough of the infant money yet he can not justify the  dispose of it it be prove that when sir Thomas Badd pay off the mortgage he  call in about pound of the infant money and that that be apply that way and in  this case the master of the roll declare that sir Thomas Badd ought to case in  chancery er p employ what he have of the estate of the infant as far as it  will go to pay his debt and do decree a redemption of the mortgage and that  sir Thomas Badd shall account and that what he have of the infant in his hand  when the mortgage be pay off shall be apply in discount of mortgagemoney and  upon payment of what be more due to the plaintiff to redeem the Lord keeper