case Jennings versus SELLECK June in court Lord chancellor Eq can ab pl S c  Lord of a westcountry manor his tenant refuse to renew make a lease of the  premise to his daughter for year and afterward sell the manor to I S who have  notice of the lease but have security that the daughter when at age shall  surrender daughter decree to have the benefit of the lease the plaintiff  father be lord of a westcountry manor and the tenant in possession of a  tenement refuse to renew the lord thereof make a lease for ninetynine year to  the plaintiff his daughter and afterward sell this estate to the defendant who  have notice of this lease take a collateral security that the plaintiff shall  release within four year after she attain her age of twentyone year the  plaintiff bill be for a account of the profit of the land comprise in the  lease and that she may hold this estate during the lease which the defendant  have get into his possession and have suppress for the defendant it be insist  that this lease make by the lord to the plaintiff his daughter be but a trust  for himself and it be the usual method that lord of westcountry manor take  when the tenant in possession refuse to renew that they may have the estate in  their own power Lord chancellor this lease do not appear to be a trust for the  father but I take it to be a advancement for his child so where a purchase by  a father in the name of his infant son decree to be a advancement and not a  trust for the father mumma v mumma post vol so where infant son have a  reversion settle on he expectant on the death of his mother Lamplugh v  Lamplugh p wms III et vide Lloyd v read ibidem but distinction where child  already advance Lord grey v lady grey mention in Lloyd v read ub sup and the  plaintiff have purchase with notice of it and take a collateral security he  must make the best of Vernon chancery case his security and therefore decree  the possession and a account of profit from the time of the defendant entry  thereon together with cost to be tax Reg lib a fol