bernard v ersus bonner eject of Firmum in a ejection strong of land and acre  of wood in Stanmore in come Middlesex upon a lease allege to be make by the  earl of Rutland and Geo Sutton DominLexington and other upon not guilty it be  move by Mainard upon the evidence in a trial at the bar that Sutton be no peer  of the realm of England but only a Irish baron and so not the same demise and  the case in die a be cite but it be answer and resolve by the court that alein  report forasinuch as the issue here be not whether g Sutton dom Lexington do  demise as it be in dyer where his title be make parcel of the issue and  therefore a failure but here it be non cul so that it be sufficient that it be  the same person that do demise though misname and so it have be resolve in the  case of a demise allege by sir Ralph ever dom ever who be no baron and in  another case of a demise allege to be make per I S dom Sinclere who be a Irish  baron upon not guilty plead c and the evidence proceed the case be that sir  Thomas lake be seize in fee of the premise levy a fine to the use of sir Nich  fortescue for year if sir t l live so long the remainder to his wife for life  the remainder to sir Nich for the life of t l with other remainder over sir  Nich grant the land totum position suum to one page and duck c habendum for  year and after sir Nich demise the same land to the say page and duck c by  indenture for year if sir though lake junior or his wife live so long page and  duck by indenture recite this last demise assign and grant the say term  babendum tl e land totum position suum during the residue of the say term of  year to sir though lake and the opinion of the court be that by the grant of  sir Nich his whole estate his remainder pass and the habendum repugnant  because no other ceremony be requisite he himself be tenant for year then it  be move that there ought to be a entry by he but that be agree not requisite  for the statute execute the estate actual and such a lessee may attorn before  entry and the case be the strong because his ternie be not sufficient to  satisfy the grant for year then it be doubt what effect the assignment of page  and duck bad because the term recite be a lease by estoppel for the lessor  only for the lessor then have nothing in the land and it be agree in this case  that if lessee for life accept of a lease for year this be a surrender of his  estate for life