case rudd against foster if the will of a contribute to the repair of the  church of b and perform all its marriage burial Christian and other parochial  rite in the parish of b it shall be consider as a part of that parish at the  time of make Elizabeth c although it have before a chapel of its own and  distinct constable belong to it SC salk replevin for take of a gelding the  defendant justify by virtue of the statute Elizabeth c for money due upon the  poor tax the party be at issue it be try at the bar the question be whether  the will of Stratton be in the parish of Biggleswade in Bedfordshire or not  the poor rate be admit and the evidence to prove it to be in that parish be  that there be but two churchwarden and two overseer of the poor and that  marriage burial and Christian and all other parochial rite be do at  Biggleswade and that the inhabitant of the will of Stratton do contribute to  the repair of the church of Biggleswade on the other side to prove that  Stratton be a repute parish by itself at the time of the make of this statute  this evidence be give videlicet in the reign of Edward the three there be a  public chapel there where the people go to hear mass and that divine service  be read in that chapel at the time of the make of this statute then it be  prove that a rate be make there in the year and that former they have distinct  constable and repair their own highway till the year and then the difference  between they be settle by the judge in their circuit they will have this like  the case between the parish of Tateridge and Hatfield Nichols v walker cro car  and see Hilton v pawle cro car a which be a special verdict upon this statute  the plaintiff live in Tateridge and have no land in Hatfield but have land  where he live he be rate to the poor of Hatfield but because at the time of  the make the statute Tateridge be a reputative parish and have distinct  constable churchwarden and overseer of the poor and make their own rate and  modern assessment which be levy by their own officer for this reason that be  hold to be a distinct parish from Hatfield but Stratton be not so much as a  parish in reputation at the time of the make of the Act and so not like that  case for all that be prove be that they have make rate since the statute and  have a chapel before but make rate will not make it a parish without all other  parochial rite and therefore it be hold to be a will in the parish of  Biggleswade king v Denham burr SC the case of Brewcomb lodge salk king v  Rufford strange king v Welbeck stram king v justice of Bedfordshire call king  v justice of Peterborough call king v ronton abbey term Rep king v Tamwalk  call king v sir Watts Horton term Rep king v leigh term Rep king v Newell term  Rep the above case be collect in Mr Consts edition of bott poor law b modern  er p