Bulstrode boundary michaelis caroli king banc king at read read plaintiff  against holms defendant enter Termin Trin caroli king b r rot error in a writ  of error to reverse a judgement give in a inferior court de Havering in a  action of debt upon a bind of l condition for the save and keep of the  plaintiff harmless read there plead to the condition that he have save he  harmless from all action the plaintiff reply that one Thomas holme who be to  have be keep harmless by the condition of the bind be arrest at the suit of  one meek and imprison at Rumford hoc a preparation be verify per record the  other plead that he never obtain any such judgement it be urge for the  plaintiff that this judgement be erroneous in omnibus S in Bulstrode er p the  style of the court be Havering at the bower and the court of the manor hold at  Rumford in the county of Essex parcel of the manor whereas he shall have say  infra jurisdiction manor and so be the precedent the court be claim part by  prescription and part by charter this ought to have be by virtue of the king  letter patent where the same be a court of record he ought to have set forth  that he be a tenant and a inhabitant for to enable himself to sue there which  he have not so do and which be the main and principal error he show that he be  arrest and imprison at Rumford but by what wooer this be so do non constat  curiae hoc a preparation be verify per record there be judgement and execution  have this be not to be put in issue per pais but per record verify as appear  by Elizabeth dyer f upon the statute of apparel h and Elizabeth dyer f verify  per record this be usual the venire facias de Rumford no place be specify  where the action or judgement be for to cause the man of Rumford for to try  this the whole court clear of opinion that the whole record be bad and  erroneous throughout the title insufficient to hold the court and the plea bad  the judgement Bulstrode erroneous and to be reverse they be not to try a  record per pais the whole record be vicious and erroneous and therefore by the  rule of the court judgement be reverse notam that bank move a exception to  quash a indictment in which five several person be indict the exception be  because the addition come after the alias speech and so not good by e fol b  the whole court clear of opinion that this be a good exception because that  the alias speech be not his true name but that which do precede as appear by h  brook case fol plea brook title brief plea h dyer fol l and so for this cause  by the rule of the court the indictment be quash