case in chancery Coventry c executor of sir henry thin contra thin now  executor of sir james thin November decree for mean profit after a former  decree for enjoyment sir Thomas thin treat with the Lord keeper Coventry for a  marriage between sir Henry his son by Katherine his second wife and daughter  of the Lord Coventry the portion pound which be pay Hempsford c to be settle  on Henry c the deed of settlement be execute by seal and delivery of it it be  by way of covenant to stand seize but want the word shall be or shall stand  seize and so be in law defective sir Thomas after the marriage die great suit  happen between sir James heir at law and sir Henry for sir James enter on sir  Henry sir Henry thin exhibit a bill in chancery against sir James on the  agreement and have a decree against sir James which be for enjoyment but no  further not for further assurance or mean profit sir James continue  disturbance sir Henry thin bring a second bill but that be ill pen he have  leave to mend it and make suit for the mean profit it abate by death once of  sir Henry thin and sir James thin also die now the bill be for the mean profit  against the plaintiff the objection be saint the length of time but that be  answer by the many suit and abatement of they d objection that it be irregular  and improper to have a bill for the mean profit now when sir Henry thin have a  former decree for the enjoyment for he then ought to have have a decree also  for the mean profit and it be to be presume that case in chancery er p the  court do then see Cause to make no decree for the profit in regard sir James  have a good Title in law and the time be troublesome and the possession a  stumble possession sometime with one of they sometime with the other however  this not reason now to patch up the former decree by a new one the reply be  saint the former bill demand not the mean profit nor a account thereof case in  chancery dly it be not unjust by one bill first to clear the Title by one bill  and then to exhibit another for the profit and it be not reasonable till the  Title be clear to the principal the manor settle while sir James set up title  to the whole one while by a entail which avoid the settlement if not cut off  another while for want of tenant to the praecipe in the recovery which dock  not the entail as to several tenement but those question be settle by several  verdict now and not before be time to have a account and dly after a decree  for enjoyment it be proper to exhibit a bill for the mean profit or as the  case may be for further assurance or for the evidence and for those two last  reason and particular for the last reason the Lord chancellor decree the  executor to account for all profit by he his agent and Baily receive since the  decree quaere if not the exhibit the bill but not for all profit which he do  or may receive without his wilful default as in some case be usual