case in chancery brown against VERMUDEN February where a parish be sue four  move to defend and a decree against they one who claim under none of the four  contest the decree where a parish be sue and four name to defend and a decree  against they one who claim under none of the four contest the decree brown  vicar of Worselworth sue a to know fac and by Subpna to have execution of a  decree have by and on the behalf of one carrier his predecessor for the ten  dick of LeadOar in the parish at the charge and labour of the miner there  videlicet case in chancery er p the vicar to pay one penny a dick carrier his  predecessor sue diverse miner there ground his suit by prescription four  person be name by the miner to defend the suit for they and a decree pass  against the four for carrier and his successor that the defendant and all the  miner shall pay Vermuden who own and wrought a I there be serve appear and  insist that he be not bind by the decree for that he be not party or privy nor  claim under any who be and if he shall be bind then the parson ought to be  bind if the decree have be against the parson which can not because the parson  nor ordinary be no party and the defendant can have no bill of review of it if  it be erroneous and therefore ought not to be bind the Lord chancellor if the  defendant shall not be bind suit of this nature as in case of enclosure suit  against the inhabitant for suit to a mill and the like will be infinite and  impossible to be end and declare that the defendant though no party nor privy  yet he may have a bill of review because he be grieve by the decree dly the  defendant insist on the jurisdiction of the DutchyCourt the parish be part of  the duchy and the king have cap and lat as in right of a duchy and a court of  revenue the chancellor it be within the county palatine this court may hold  plea of land in the duchy dly the court who make the decree hold the d per  dick too little and order a Commission to settle some more reasonable  recompense to the miner which never be execute non allocatur case in chancery  thly sir John heath be tenant in common with Vermuden who ought not to be  prosecute alone but the defendant notwithstanding be rule to perfect his  answer to the interrogatory the Lord chancellor the question be whether the  decree while it stand shall be obey not whether it be well make