c lady Radnor v rotherham S c Charles can Prec in Charles vern Eq can ab dower  Sho Rep the Lord Radnor in his settlement limit a term to trustee for  ninetynine year for such use and purpose as he shall appoint and for default  of appointment to attend the remainder which be to the use of he and the heir  of his body remainder to his own right heir afterward he make several  appointment in pursuance of the trust and die the appointment be all satisfy  the plaintiff bring a writ of dower and recover at law but can have no fruit  of it by reason of this term which be take in by the defendant who purchase  part of the estate and be keep on foot to protect his purchase whereupon she  prefer her bill to be let into the estate notwithstanding the term the  appointment be all satisfy it be insist for her that the trust be satisfy and  the term be to attend the remainder ought likewise to attend her dower which  be reserve out of the remainder it be agree in this case that a jointress  shall have have this term to have attend her estate and shall not have stand  in her way in case there have be any agreement that she show have have her  dower that then this term in shall not have stand in her way in case there  have be a mortgage upon the estate she shall have be let into a redemption for  that when the mortgage be satisfy the mortgagee have no more to do with the  estate Beverley and hay in case of a extent of a satisfy statute a dowager  have be relieve against it because it ought to be vacate freeman er p freeman  but the Lord keeper be of opinion that the plaintiff can have no relief in  this case he say there be no precedent where the dowager be ever yet relieve  against a heir at law where there be a term to attend the inheritance and much  less in this case where the defendant be a purchaser and for that which be  allege that the defendant at the time of the purchase have notice of the  plaintiff right of dower so he have also notice of the lease which be to  protect it and so that be nothing for the case of Fesont and Fesont where the  dowager bring a bill to be relieve against a term to attend the inheritance it  be not resolve but the case be agree the case of Fletcher and Robinson cite in  Prec in Charles p wms p wms where colonel Robinson be in danger of a  forfeiture make a lease to his young son and after the elder son marry and die  his widow bring a writ of dower and this lease be insist upon it be decree  that it shall not be give in evidence but there the reason be because it be  perfect a fraudulent lease and for the case of clay and sell where it be hold  that tenant by the courtesy shall have the benefit of a term attend the  inheritance which decree be make at the roll and affirm before he he say he  have look upon his note and never find that that point be stir in the case and  though in this case here be great reason to assist the plaintiff she have  bring a great fortune into the family he say that can make no alteration for  it may be say to be reasonable that there shall be dower of the trust of a  inheritance or of a long term for year and yet it be never do and he say if  the defendant hero have be only heir at law he can have give no relief there  have be no precedent especial in a case which must needs happen often Affirmed  in dom proc on appeal show p c see the case and the ground upon which it be  decide discuss at length in maundrell v maundrell Ves Ves by which it be  settle that in order to protect himself by a satisfy term against claim of  dower the purchaser must have procure a actual assignment thereof for his use