case not versus hill see berny v Pitt vern wiseman v beak vern Davis v duke of  Marlborough sweet n and case there collect ORorke v Bolingbroke App Cas eoden  die in court Lord keeper Ch Rep Eq can ab pl cite ves a purchase of a  reversion from a heir in the life of his father at a under value set aside  though if the heir have die before his father the purchaser will have lose all  his money ante case Vid post case note this decree not be sign and enrol the  cause be reheard before the Lord chancellor jefferys that may who reverse the  Lord guildford decree and confirm the decree make by the Lord Nottinqham  declare he take hill purchase to be a unrighteous bargain in the beginning and  that nothing which happen afterward can help it the plaintiff be entitle to a  estate tail after the death of sir Thomas not his father in a house at  Richmond in Surrey which if in possession be worth to be Vernon chancery case  er p sell about pound and be cast off by his father and destitute of all mean  of livelihood do in for pound pay he in money and pound per and secure to be  pay he during the joint life of he and his father absolute convey his  remainder in tail to the defendant hill father and his heir it appear upon the  plead that the plaintiff receive no more than the pound and the pound per and  for five year and no long Reg lib b fol Vernon chancery case the plaintiff  father live year after this conveyance and after his father death plaintiff  bring his bill to be relieve against this conveyance charge that it be intend  to be only as a security and though there be no proof to that purpose and the  deed be absolute and though hill have lose all his money if the plaintiff have  die in his father lifetime yet upon the first hear of this cause that June car  the Lord Nottingham decree a redemption and this cause be now reheard before  the Lord keeper he reverse the Lord nottingham decree and declare he do not  see how he can relieve the plaintiff if it be to be declare a law in chancery  that no man must deal with a heir in his father lifetime that be something but  as it now stand he see no reason to relieve the plaintiff but dismiss the bill  Reg lib b fol say vide this decree reverse post vol vide Barney v Tyson vent  batty v Lloyd ante and case cite in not there