case gay against key where the custom of a manor be quod dominus pro tempore  may demise in possession or reversion the grant of a tenant in dower shall  bind the heir though the reversion do not fall into possession during the  estate of bien who make the grant say vide more contra Ro ab more godb roll  Abr cro James Owen Leon Mod Mod the lord of a manor have no service but  demesne only may hold a special court but not a court baron   light a the  operation of the per nomen ante post trespass upon demurrer the case be that a  feme recover dower of the manor of Fremington wherein be many copyhold for  life and a custom qubd dominus pro tempo may demise for one two or three life  in possession or in reversion upon a writ of hahere facias seisigbam the  sheriff return that he have deliver to the feme the three part of the manor  videlicet such several tenement recite they particular whereof a copyhold  tenement in the tenure of Alice pilchard vas one the tenant in dower keep  court and grant the say copyhold tenement to the plaintiff and to two other  for their life hahendum post death Alice price the tenant in dower afterward  die and then Alice price die the lord enter the plaintiff enter and the croak  Elizabeth defendant ousts he and whether this grant by copy in reversion which  be not execute during the life of the tenant in dower be good a ante post  croak Elizabeth er p or not be the question William sergeant move for the  plaintiff that it be good and say that it be so adjudge in the common plea  Elizabeth brag v bourn and sir Peter carry v Southcott in this court and in  Elizabeth dyer in arundel case wherefore c and of that opinion be Popham and  Clench justice they only be in court and be ready to have give judgement  accord Fir Popham say that it be now without question hold to be good although  it be not execute in the life of a particular tenant who grant although it be  doubt in the earl of arundel case Trin Elizabeth for the reason why tenant in  dower or a particular tenant may grant a copyhold in reversion as well as in  possession be the custom and thereby the grant be warrant and therefore there  be not any difference in either of the case but one who have a particular  estate in a manor can grant a copyhold by parcel or demise part and retain the  residue himself and therefore if a feme he endow of several copyhold tenement  she can grant part of they by copy in possession or reversion wherefore c but  h W at take exception to the plead first because it be not allege you that any  the service of any of the freeholder be allot to the feme but the dernesnes  and copyhold tenement only so as she have not any manor nor can keep any court  nor grant any copy c but Popham hold clear that she may notwithstanding for  although she have no service can have a court baron yet she may have a special  court for this purpose and it be good enough and so it be adjudge in Str  Christ hatton case for Wellingborough where he have twenty copyhold tenement  parcel of the say manor grant unto he by the queen and because some of they  refuse to come to his court they forfeit their copyhold wherefore c second he  move that the grant be not well plead for he plead it as a grant in possession  and not as in reversion the record be view and it be that he grant  tenementaprcedicta per nomen of a message which Alice price hold for life and  it be resolve to he a incurable default for it be not allege that he grant the  tenement in reversion and the per nomen will not help it wherefore for this  cause it be adjudge for the defendant