Bulstrode doiley plaintiff against white defendant enter Hillar James b r rot  Cr a action for false imprisonment in a action bring for a false imprisonment  the case appear to be this a warrant be direct to take Julian doiley widow  unto white the defendant who by force thereof do take Julian doiley the  plaintiff be the wife of c and yet in veritv she be the same person that be to  be take by the say warrant and upon special justification make by the  defendant and set forth the whole matter the judgement be quod to wrinkle  Julianarn predict per noalen of Julian Goddard ad to give satisfaction bring  addict leonardum pro financial loss c the truth be that at the time of the  warrant issue out against her she be then Julian Goddard widow but at the time  when she be arrest take and imprison she be then Julian doiley the wife of  doiley upon this special justification the plaintiff demurrer in law it be  urge for the plaintiff that the sheriff have no warrant to take Julian doiley  the action be first bring be trespass against Julian Goddard widow hang this  suit she take doiley to husband judgement be give for Julian Goddard against  Leonard the plaintiff in the action who reverse this judgement by a writ of  error and so have the warrant to the sheriff ut above by force of which he do  take the say Julian doiley wife of the plaintiff have no warrant so to do and  for this be cite Elizabeth fol c e fol brook title faux imprisonment it is  pleasing if a capias do issue out against I b of dale gentleman and there be  two of the same name and mystelT within the same ville the sheriff at his  peril ought to take upon he the knowledge who it be that be sue for if he take  the other who be not sue he shall have a action of false imprisonment against  the sheriff and he shall not excuse himself by equity of their name Haugliton  justice Preadictain Julianam this extend it self to the person the judgement  give be for Julian Goddard the error to reverse the judgement this be against  Julian Goddard and so the process she be sue and pfeaeed as a feme sole and so  be the capias and so she be bind by conclusion she be take now and bring a  false imprisonment dodderidge justice she plead in the c b as a widow and  judgement be there give for her as a widow a writ of error bring here in this  court against her as a widow to reverse the judgement and it appear that at  that time she take another husband doiley Henry Yelverton it appear by the  justification that before the to know facias ad to hear wandering she take her  husband doiley dodderidge justice the false imprisonment be here bring by  doiley against whae for make a assault Bulstrode er p in super wife Self  doiley and imprison of her he sue the suit in Leonard love name before the  marriage versus prmdictam Julianam in the c b and that after issue there join  to lead in wife prediction Julianam judgement give there for her the same  reverse here by a writ of error quod predict Julian to wrinkle so that here be  a certain denotation of the person that be to be take and she be so take  accord croak justice the action shall not here be change by reason of  Bulstrode the intermarriage dodderidge justice and Fleming chief justice the  book before cite of e and e make nothing at all to this case here now in  question there be no manner of inducement within the record as here there be  in this case for here throughout the whole record there be a sufficient and a  good inducement for the take of her and the subsequent marriage here by her  with doiley be but as a add he and in the per if this process here have not  sufficient denote out the person who ought to be arrest as if the same be to  take a felbe sole and before she be take she become to be a feme covert and be  so take by this process here in this case without all doubt a action of false  imprisonment well lie but it be not so here in this principal case for here be  a good and sufficient designation of the party nominati that be to be take and  the capias here also well award and if it shall be demand who shall pay the  cost here the answer hereunto clear shall be that the say Julian widow be to  pay the same the capias here issue out against her but not against her husband  as take no notice at all of he be not once so much as name in any part of the  record if upon this capias the sheriff have return that she be not marry or  have return a non be invention without all doubt this have be a ill return  either to have return that she be marry or a non be invention for by this he  will have falsify all the proceed and so clear by the whole court it be agree  that the take and imprison her be lawful and justifiable and the action of  false imprisonment thus bring here by the husband be no way maintainable and  by the whole court if all action be bring against one be a widow and she be  find guilty and before judgement she take a husband yet the capias shall be  here against her and not agailitt her husband and so the whole court agree in  this that upon the whole record here it do sufficient to agree de personal to  be arrest that the defendant bereil have well pursue his warrant and that the  action of false imprisonment here bring by the plaintiff not maintainable and  so the rule of the court be quod querells Dil to take in hand per billam