case Ashurst against mingay and Farrer Hilary term car roll a grant a lease  for year to b and c who covenant for themselves and their assign to pay the  rend to a and his assign accord to the reservation b with the consent of a  assign the remainder of his interest in the term to c a receive the whole rend  from c and afterward assign his reversion to d d as assignee of the reversion  may maintain covenant against b for rend accrue after the assignment of his  interest in the term to c for no act of the lessee can discharge d but see  Burwells case vent king v Bacebaker salk smith case sell and Rem contra and  king v shed stram accord see also the vol Mr Consts edition bott poor law ch  sect where all the case upon this subject be collect a see the statute Henry c  and Edward c a under sheriff be mention in all the print edition of this  statute shower KB er p he or his assign from the special covenant of which the  assignee of the reversion shall have advantage by the Henry c SC Jones  covenant a lease to two render rend c one lease to the other all his part c a  assign his reversion to b who accept the whole rend of the lessee to who c the  question be whether b may charge the other with covenant agree by all that in  case a lessee assign over his estate and the rend be accept of the assignee  that then the lessee be not Chargeable with debt for the rend after the  assignment but it be also agree that covenant lie against such lessee after  such assignment and acceptance for be a express covenant the acceptance of  another will not discharge the covenantor but here the doubt be concern the  assignee of the grantee of the reversion if he shall have covenant now the  statute of Henry c say that assignee of reversion shall and may have covenant  c in the same manner that the lessor may have have which be as much as if he  have be party to the deed and in case of reparation it be so in the case of  baily v ford a it be resolve that a shower KB assignee of a term shall have  covenant by way of retainer against the assignee of the reversion and in the  case of bachelor v gage b it be resolve on a covenant not to erect any  building in the garden that notwithstanding a assignment and acceptance of the  rend from the assignee and death of the lessee yet it be a express covenant a  action of covenant lie against the executor of the lessee now he in reversion  be without doubt as much concern to have the rend pay as to have the house c  repair sander e contra in the first institute b where Lord coke expound this  statute he say it extend not so far as the word seem to include for the  payment of a sum in gross the delivery of corn or the like be not within it  now suppose the lessee and another have covenant to pay rend it will have be  collateral and the assignee can not have take advantage of it for as to the  three person covenant the lessor have it not as a lessor now in our case the  acceptance of Farrer for his sole tenant make Mingays covenant to be  collateral and mingay be only Chargeable with the covenant to the lessor for  he be now a collateral person and Chargeable only with the covenant and not  with the rend and for his part he say he think if a release have be of the  rend to mingay after the assignment and acceptance it will have wrought  nothing and there be a great difference between this case and that of Brett v  Cumberland c for there the acceptance be before the grant of the reversion and  so the covenant be settle by the acceptance and he sue he on the covenant as  on a collateral security not as tenant curian my Lord coke say collateral  thing but Mr sander interpret this of collateral person now the rend be no  collateral thing though the person be so for here be real rend due from mingay  Adjornatur d