case MIDDLETON versus Lord Onslow et all at the roll Eq can ab pl pl if on the  consent of the wife and her trustee and in order to a composition with the  husband creditor the court order part of the trustmoney to be pay to the  creditor thus consent to discharge he of the debt any private note c take by  any of the creditor for part of their debt beside their share with the rest of  the creditor will be set aside one Mr Hockenel marry one of the daughter and  coheir of Mr Middleton without the consent or privity of her relation and be  much in debt abscond in peer William er p privilege place for fear of his  creditor but be a young gentleman in hope of some employment and his wife  entitle to a portion of about or pound in the hand of her trustee she with her  trustee petition the master of the roll that they may make proposal to Mr  Hockenels creditor touch the composition of his debt and that thereupon the  trustee may be at liberty to apply any sum not exceed for that purpose and mrs  Hockenel the wife be in court consent that the trustee peer William shall  dispose of pound of her portion for the purpose aforesaid several of the  creditor to the number of about fifty sign the deed of composition to take S d  in the pound but about seven of the creditor be the remainder of they delay  the execution of the deed of composition until the last day and then execute  it but at the same time take note and bind from Mr Hockenel to pay the rest of  the money at a future day some of which be postdated and bear date after the  deed of composition some make to other person in trust and other make Payable  to the creditor or order by way of promissory note and in the deed of  composition the petition and the order of court be recite and now mrs Hockenel  and her trustee petition the master oh f the roll that the creditor may  deliver up and discharge all these security cur I shall not nor indeed can I  compel any honest creditor to compound his debt but when they have compound  and agree to accept of S d per pound and by suggestion that Mr Hockenel be to  have his liberty have induce the court to give way and the wife to consent  that part of her portion which be not before liable to these debt shall be  apply to this purpose and have prevail upon the trustee to give away part of  the portion to the creditor and afterward on the last day mention in the deed  of composition which provide that the whole deed shall be void unless seal by  all the creditor by such a particular time have come in to take advantage of  the necessity of the husband and to gain these underhand security as they  thereby defeat the intent of the order of court authorize the trustee to peer  William compound as the disappoint the wife who in hope of her husband liberty  consent that part of her portion shall be apply to the discharge of his debt  and as they frustrate the intention of the trustee who in confidence of the  husband have his liberty have pay away part of the portion towards the debt  this underhand deal of the creditor be a fraud on the wife on the trustee and  on the court for which reason let all such security be set aside and deliver  up by the creditor to the husband Mr Hockenel vide Spurret v spiller I atk  earl of Chesterfield v Jansen ves atk S c and see child v danbridge vern  Mawson v stock ves Dalbiac v Dalbiac Ves Daubeny v Cockburn I mere and case  collect in the note to Lewis v chase ante and Robert v Robert post Vol III  Cockshot v Bennet t r