case buckler against harvey a be tenant for life make a lease for year to b  and then grant the reversion for his own life to c hahendum from midsummer  next ensue the grant be void though the lessee attorns after its commencement  and if c after the expiration of the term enter under this grant and a levy a  fine to he it be a forfeiture of the estate for life for which the  remainderman may enter post SC   more and   light vin hob   roll Rep dyer vent    a cro James salk Com dig Bac Abr wood con   light a Ejectionefirmce upon a  special verdict the case be tenant for life remainder to a buckler in tail  tenant for life that march Elizabeth make a lease for four year and afterward  two that April Elizabeth grant the reversion hahendum tenement prcedicta from  midsummer next ensue for the life of the grantor after midsummer the lessee  for year attorns the term afterward expire the grantee enter the grantor levy  a fine unto he sur conusance de law come Ceo c the tenant in tail in remainder  enter for the forfeiture and let we it to the plaintiff upon who the defendant  be the grantee in reversion reenter the first tenant for life be yet alive et  si c it the first question be whether by this grand t of the reversion  hahendum after midsummer and the attornment make after midsummer the grant be  good or void second admit it to he void if when the grantee enter and he be in  by seize the tenant fc r life levy a fine to he sur conusance de law come Ceo  c whether this he a forfeiture of his estate or not it be argue by hole for  the plaintiff and by Harris for the defendant Walmsley justice a grant of a  reversion hahendum after the death of the tenant for life be good for so be  the course in fine for this limitation be as to the have the possession and  not as to the have the reversion for that be in the grantee present but when a  reversion be grant hahendum after a day future he be thereby exclude to have  the reversion until that time and therefore it be utter void and the hahendum  shall not he void but where it be not requisite as in release of a right or  grant of a term but here the hahendum be necessary to show the estate but as  to the forfeiture I make some doubt for I know not how there can he a  forfeiture to he who have not any reversion for by the entry of the grantee it  be seize and all remainder and reversion be take from the party in who they be  and how can one forfeit a estate which he have not as here he have not who  levy the fine and it have be hold in this court by Lord dyer and other that if  he in remainder for life levy a fine sur conusance de law come Ceo c that it  be not any forfeiture croak Elizabeth for it be but as a release and therefore  Edward rend can be reserve upon such a fine and there be not any book that it  shall he a forfeiture Anderson chief justice it be clear that it be a  forfeiture and it be not by reason of any estoppel but by reason of the  prejudice to he in reversion and although the tenant for life have but a right  yet when he have levy a fine he in the remainder may enter present for the  forfeiture upon the seize but if he have release by fine there shall not he  any forfeiture but by that fine levy every one shall I e conclude but that he  give a fee by the fine and it be not material although that he in remainder he  a stranger thereto as if a stranger bring waste against tenant forlife and he  plead nul wastefait or if tenant for life pray in aid of a stranger he in  remainder be a stranger to these record yet he shall take advantage in regard  of the prejudice to the reversion for the first point I doubt but I conceive  the grant to he void and that he by his entry be a seize Heaurnond justice the  grant be void for if the estate have pass by the livery it have be clear void  and the same law be here for the hahendum be not void otherwise but in regard  that no estate be limit in the premise and because the habdndum limit the  estate and all the estate depend upon that which be void and croak Elizabeth  er p the grant be void the grantee by his entry be a seize and yet there shall  he a forfeiture of the tenant for life in regard he presume to give a great  estate than he have wherefore c Owen justice be absent in the duchy Chamber  and it be there adjourn but afterward pasch Elizabeth upon these reason it be  adjudge to be a forfeiture and the entry of he in reversion to he lawful a