case CLOWDSLEY versus pelham novembris Lord chancellor Eq can ab pl S c one  devise all his land to a and the heir of his body remainder over and in  another part of the will devise to a all his personal estate and make he  executor Willing he to pay his debt this be a charge upon the land as well as  on the personal estate to pay the debt the plaintiff bill be to have  satisfaction for a debt owe to he by Anthony dean decease who by his will have  devise all his land to the defendant Pelham and the heir of his body with  remainder over to another and in another part of his will recite that he owe  the defendant Pelham money upon account he therefore devise to he all his  personal estate and make he executor Willing he to pay his debt vide Newman v  Johnson ante p lypet v carter ves real estate decree to be charge with annuity  give by the will though no express word to charge the land the executor be  devisee of the land Elliott v Hancock post vol so as to legacy Alcock v  sparhawk post vol where say this case of Clowdsley v Pelham affirm on appeal  to the lord upon the read of the will though the clause as to payment of debt  seem to relate to the personal estate only and though the land be devise to  the defendant in tail with a remainder over to another and that it be object  that a tenant in tail can not be a trustee yet the court decree both real and  personal estate to be sell for payment of the testator debt Reg lib a fol vide  haslewood v pope p wms and case in not there grey v Minethorpe Ves Burton v  Knowlton ibidem Brummell v Protheroe ibidem William v city ibidem Hartley v  hurl Ves and the rule at present seem to be that the personal estate be the  natural fund that against the charge natural throw upon the personal estate  you may show a distinct exemption or from the whole will you m a collect that  there be a intention express in the will not in as many word that the personal  estate shall be exempt but that charge the real estate ever so anxious for  payment of debt will not of itself be sufficient to exempt the personal estate  tait v Lord Northwick Ves bridge v Phillips Ves and the declaration or  intention to exempt the personal estate must be plain and manifest how v Lord  Dartmouth Ves Powell v robin ibidem so Milnes v slater Ves Bootle v Blundell  mere Gittins v steel swan green v green mad