attorneygeneral contra sir george sand pasch car in the exchequer how trust to  be forfeit sir Ralph freeman purchase a lease for year of several manor and  afterward purchase the inheritance thereof in the name of sir George sand his  soninlaw in trust for sir Ralph and his heir and afterward sir Ralph make his  will by which he appoint that both Mr freeman who he make his executor and sir  George sand shall join to convey part to freeman sand and part io George sand  the two son of sir George sand and to their heir and the residue to all the  son of sir George by his then lady sir Ralph daughter and their heir who shall  be live at the time of the death of sir Ralph and then die sir George have at  the time of sir Ralph death only freeman who soon after die without issue and  George sand chancery report but afterward sir George have another chancery  report er p son call freeman Mr freeman the executor refuse the executorship  whereupon Administration be grant to sir George sand afterward no conveyance  be make either of the lease or of the reversion of George sand by sir George  who have both in trust for sir George accord to the will freeman sand kill  George his brother and afterward be attaint for murder quaere whether any of  these trust either of the lease for year or the reversion which be in sir  George in trust as aforesaid be forfeit by this felony to the king of who the  land be hold who by his attorney sue sir George sand in the equity side of the  exchequer to answer the profit to the king suppose the trust to be forfeit by  the felony the case be several time argue at the bar and this term chief baron  hale and baron turner Rainsford be remove into the king bench and Atkins  disable by age both argue that the trust be not forfeit in their argument it  be agree that beneficiary and trust in fee or feetail forfeit the same by  attainder of treason and the estate to be execute to the king in a court of re  view by the statute of h h chancery report a alien beneficiary and trust of a  estate the trust belong to the king and the chief baron say it be the opinion  of the judge in holland case Trin car where the chief baron be of counsel for  a alien have no capacity to purchase but for the king use as to the king debt  by the commonlaw and the practice of this court which be part of the commonlaw  beneficiary and trust be indebt to the king the king shall have execution of  this trust for before the statute h h make in the time of h there be precedent  in the court that the Writ of to stretch out facias for the levy of the king  debt be of the debtor land or any other land of which any other person be  seize to his use and this be the reason of sir Edward croak case where the  interest of the king debt do attach upon the power of the king debtor to  revoke a settlement by he make of the estate pasch James ford case certain  term be take in trust for a recusant and hold liable to the king debt of pound  a month so that where the king debtor have the profitable part of the estate  the king shall not lose his debt by any fiction chancery report it agree that  the trust of the reversion can not be forfeit for felony which the court hold  clear and cite for authority   marquis of Winchester case   Edward cro h cap  and if inheritance it be not forfeit for felony by felon appear by h cap and  there be no fine due to a Lord as long as he have a tenant and therefore till  the statute of h cap the Lord can not seize the land of which his villain be  beneficiary and use and if it be demand what shall become of this trust if  beneficiary and trust die without heir it be answer the land shall be  discharge of this trust as if tenant in fee of a rentcharge die without heir  or be attaint of felony the land be discharge if a lease in gross the trust  thereof shall be forfeit for felony or outlawry in a personal action as the  earl of Somerset case in hob Daccombs case cro babington case and sir William  raleigh case a lease for year if it be of never so long continuance if it be  assign in trust for I S and his heir yet it shall go to his executor yet trust  be rule accord to the style and course of court of equity a real chattel in  law survive to husband chancery report but not the trust of such a real  chattel   light chapter remitter so if a man who be beneficiary and trust bind  himself and his heir in a bind this trust be not asset to the heir though  since question in Lord chancellor hide time but clear the trust of a lease for  year be asset to charge a executor in equity so a trust assign over to wait  the inheritance still go to the heir or heir of the body because keep on foot  for special purpose and this have great resemblance to the case of charter  which go with the inheritance to the heir but if grant over the parchment and  wax shall go to the grantee and his executor h and in the present case no  trust of a chattel be forfeit to the king because the lease for year be not in  freeman who be attaint of felony nor the trust in he as a chattel for then he  must have be executor or administrator to George the son and how be it sir  Ralph intent the lease and inheritance shall be confound and not keep separate  and again freeman can have his trust but as heir to George and as long as he  have the inheritance in he and no long it shall go to the heir as a nomin pn  patronage by Founderage charter c and the mischief otherwise will be great to  have such weighty chancery report er p term chancery report forfeit by  outlawry and so judgement be give against the king attorney Mews dig title  Criminal law b I SC hard freeman Nels see barrow v Wadkin Beav sharp v saint  sauver lr Ch