bishop OF saint davids versus Lucy see SC ld raym with note salk SC Danv p  sell a curacy and take money for admit person into order be simony Mod dr  Watson bishop of saint Davids be convene before his provincial the archbishop  of Canterbury at Lambeth to answer certain article exhibit against he before  the archbishop at the promotion of the defendant Lucy by which article he be  charge with simony and other high misdemeanour in his office of bishop and  they be above thirty in number some of they be as follow sacred scripture that  the bishop in consideration of by he receive do covenant by deed with one  brook a clergyman to make he curate of his the bishop S rectory of BoronyGreen  in the diocese of Ely which he hold in commendam and that he have private give  a bind to the say brook to resign to he in some short time another of the  article be for take several sum of money from several person name they to  admit they into order and for collation and institution more than what be the  customary fee allow and it be allege that original no fee ought to be pay in  such case and this be also charge against he as simony another of the article  be that the bishop of that diocese for the time be be former make visitor of a  public school of charity and that this bishop bad pervert the charity to other  person than direct by the founder and upon his visitation have carry away all  the book which concern the charity and the very Carthew grant it self by which  it be give and govern now at his pleasure that the bishop have make  certificate under his episcopal sea that several person who have institution  have likewise take the oath of allegiance and supremacy to qualify they which  be false in fact and so bad abuse the authentical seal that the bishop bad  give complete ordination to one Owen who be but nineteen year of age whereas  he ought to be twentyfour year old and now it be move for a prohibition and as  to the first and second article admit they to be true the bishop be only  guilty of a misdemeanour for what be charge in those article be not simony but  it be object that the archbishop have no jurisdiction to convene before  himself any suffragan for a misdemeanour say curian of another opinion and per  holt chief justice the sell the curacy and take money to admit man into order  be simony and punishable by the metropolitan and this very plain that all the  clergy be bind by the canon confirm only by the king but they must be confirm  by the parliament to bind the laity and after many debate a prohibition be  deny but only quoad the matter about the school which be hold to be mere  temporal and afterward they proceed at Lambeth against the bishop upon the  rest of the article and there a sentence of deprivation pass against he from  which he appeal and that sentence be affirm by the delegate and then dr Watson  withdraw himself out of the kingdom secret