case rudge versus barker July a bequeathe to his grandchild b c and d pound  apiece and the interest thereof to their use and if any die to the survivor or  survivor share and share alike the interest to be pay to their father to be  improve to their use b die a infant then c die the share which c take by the  death of b shall not survive to d but go to e the father who administer to c  the interest and principal be to receive the same construction Thomas coal  make his will as follow videlicet I give unto in granddaughter Elizabeth and  whether and to my grandson Thomas pound of my capital stock case tempt Talbot  in the east India company and the interest thereof to they for their use and  if any die to the survivor or survivor share and share alike and my meaning be  that the interest shall be pay to their father my son Howard to be improve to  their use the grandson die a infant by which his share survive among his two  sister then one of the sister die and the question be whether the share she  have take by survivorship upon her brother death shall survive to the other  sister as well as her original legacy of pound or whether that share take by  survivorship shall go to the father who be her administrator master of the  roll the first question be whether the interest shall receive a different  construction from the principal but I think it will not for be both couple  together they must receive the same determination the next question be whether  the share arise by survivorship which the decease sister take upon her brother  death will survive to the next sister or whether it will go to her father who  be her administrator and I be of opinion that it do not survive but go to her  administrator indeed it may be the testator intend the whole to go among his  grandchild and nobody else to have any benefit but whatever his intent may be  I must judge upon the word of the will and accord to those the limitation over  relate to the legacy only have they not be distinct legatee it may have be  another question but be entire distinct and not even so much as tenant in  common the case be the same as that of bearnes versus Ballard there be a  devise to four child of pound apiece at eighteen or marriage then to the  survivor or survivor of such survivor one of the child die a minor and then  his share survive to the three remain child another afterward die a minor and  the question be whether the share which come by survivorship to the last  decease minor shall upon the minor death survive again and hold it shall not  before the Lord king June where it be decree for the administrator and agree  with the Lord holt opinion cite in uvoodward and Glasbrooks case vern the  testator e g by his will inter alian devise several parcel of land to his  several child in tail and if any of they die before twenty or unmarried such  child part to go over to the survivor child in ejectment before Lord holt he  be of opinion that Thomas die unmarried though he attain his age of twentyone  his moiety go over to the survivor and John another son likewise die unmarried  though after twentyone that his moiety go over to the survivor but that what  go over to John on the death of his brother Thomas will not go over again a  second time the devise be several and the question be not upon the original  share but upon the share that accrue by the survivorship which go to the  administrator by reason of the word share case tempt Talbot and share alike  which be tantamount to the word equal to be divide and so decree vide ex part  west in the matter of Scaise a bankrupt bro Chan re from the report of which  case it appear as if Lord Thurlow do not altogether coincide in opinion with  Lord Talbot in the doctrine exhibit by he in Rudge v Barker for he seem to  think it a very natural construction that the word share use by the testator  in the lastmentioned case mean all that the party take under the will which  will take in the survive part as well as the original share and that it strike  he forcible that the whole ought to survive but as there be case in point  which express determine otherwise he do not carp sit in bankruptcy to overturn  they in the case before he the party afterward file a bill and the cause be  set down before his honour the master of the bolls who decree that the share  do not survive a second time Vid also Perkins v Micklethwaite p will pain v  Benson atk the share accrueing by survivorship to the father who be the  administrator of the decease Reg lib a case tempt Talbot er p