c anonymous power   mildmay case it be say per cancellar where a covenant be  make to stand seize to use and a power raise thereby to make lease which be  void at law cross v Faustenditch cro James the obvious reason be that the  power be general will extend to lessee who be stranger to the consideration of  blood which consideration be necessary to support a covenant to stand seize to  use such a power therefore be void in its creation can be make good by be  subsequent exercise in favour of a party within the consideration unless he be  express name in the deed Goodtitle v Petto Str Barnard king b r that lease be  make by virtue of such a power it be decree in this court but in the late case  of Warwick v Gerrard vern Lord chancellor jefferies who though detestable in  many part of his public character have be pronounce by the high live authority  a very able lawyer decide when sit in equity conformable to the legal doctrine  the reporter it be true add a quaere yet to his note but the result of inquiry  will probable be that it be desirable the establish rule of law shall be  support in equity also and that in fact it be so notwithstanding the dictum in  the text see Sugd on pow d edit by the Lord Elsmere that the lessee shall  enjoy their lease de term S hill in curian porter c anonymous north Lord  keeper upon the act of distribution for intestates estate these point have be  resolve as it be affirm to I by Mr Keck and Mr Moseley c that the customary  part belong to the administrator of a citizen of London die intestate be not  within the Act the stat of distribution and car c because the custom of London  be save by the Act the customary part shall go whole to the administrator as  it do before and so it have be resolve at commonlaw and in chancery But three  year after this decision the law in this respect be alter by the stat James c  S by which it be provide that such part of a intestate citizen estate as  devolve upon his administrator shall be subject to the statute of distribution  this dead man part as it be term be one three of the property if he leaves  both a wife and child one half if he leaves only a wife or only child salk if  he leaves neither wife nor child the whole be distributable by the stat  Percival v crisp show that where a man make a executor to who he devise all  the rest and residue c and this executor die before the testator he that take  administration cum testament fastening shall be liable to make distribution of  this surplus within the Act of parliament salk that if a child die and the  mother administer she shall not be compellable to make distribution to any of  the brother and sister of the intestate But see the stat of throw before cite  but see the stat of James before cite freeman de term S mich in curian porter