burgess against burgess trust of a term decree from the heir to a  administratrix Thomas burgess after his intermarriage with Elizabeth hughs his  first wife by lease and release date July in consideration of his wife be  settle her land upon he and his heir which be do by fine convey diverse  freehold land to the use of himself for life and after his decease to the use  of the wife Elizabeth for her life and after the determination of the say  estate then to the use of the first son of the say Thomas on the body of the  say Elizabeth to be beget and the heir of the body of such first son and for  default of such issue to the use of the d d that that that that and every  other son and son of the body of the say Thomas on the body of the say  Elizabeth to be beget successive and the heir of the body of such son or son  and for default or such issue then if at the death of the say Thomas the say  Elizabeth shall be enseint with child then to the use of Skinner and clark  trustee and their heir until the birth of such afterborn child or child and if  it be a son or son then to the use of such son and son and the heir of the  body of such son and son and for default of such issue to the use and behoof  of all and every the daughter and daughter of the say Thomas burgess on the  body of the say Elizabeth beget or to be beget as well which shall be bear as  which she the say Elizabeth shall be enseint with at the time of the death of  the say Thomas and the heir of the body of such case in chancery daughter and  daughter and for want of such issue to the use of the right heir of Thomas and  Elizabeth for ever Thomas burgess be likewise possess of other land by two  lease for ninetynine year determinable upon three life by a other deed bear  date with the forementioned deed of settlement for the consideration therein  mention do assign the say leasehold land to Skinner and clark two of the  defendant in trust to the several intent and purpose and for the use which be  limit and declare of and concern the say land of inheritance of the say Thomas  burgess in and by the say indenture bear even date with the say deed and  assignment Thomas burgess have no son by the say Elizabeth but have one  daughter which be now the defendant Elizabeth who be alive at the time of the  make of the say indenture be Dec Thomas burgess survive and after marry Ursula  a second wife by who he have issue two son and one daughter and die intestate  and Ursula mrs wife be administratrix queen whether the trust of the say lease  do belong to Elizabeth the daughter or the administratrix after this Cause be  state and the Lord keeper finch have take time to consider it he declare that  the limitation because it be a remote trust and tend to a perpetuity to the  defendant Elizabeth as daughter of Thomas burgess be a void limitation and on  that reason decree the two lease to the plaintiff as administratrix to Thomas  burgess case in chancery de term sanct trin year king car two in cancellar