case young against foul Hilary term car roll a grant by the bishop of the  office of register of a diocese in reversion after the death of the tenant for  life to a infant of eleven year of age to drive per see well deputy to put  under be good notwithstanding the infancy but if he make a insufficient deputy  it be a forfeiture of the office ante march roll ab roll ab   dyer hob cro  Elizabeth   light Inst Com dig case tem S Talbot Mod cro Elizabeth ante more  Bac ab the office of register of a diocese or any other office usual grant for  life in possession or reversion may be grant in reversion by every bishop and  if confirm by the dean and chapter will bind his successor ante action upon  the case for disturb he to execute his office of the register of the diocese  of Rochester upon not guilty plead a special verdict be find that from time  whereof memory c the bishop of Rochester for the time be have use to grant the  office of the register for all cause within the diocese of Rochester as well  in possession as in reversion for life habendum et to drive by such a person  to who such a grant be make when the office come into per see well to put  under deputy habendum for the life of such a person to who such a grant shall  be make and they find the statute of Elizabeth c and that Thomas Wardgar be  officer for his life that June and be in possession for his life by a former  grant and he be so in possession John young bishop of Rochester eoden that  June by his deed grant the say office to John young the plaintiff habendum et  to drive per see well to put under deputy suum for his life when it shall be  void by the death or surrender of the say Thomas Wardgar which be confirm by  the dean and chapter by their deed d June and they find that the say John  young at the time of the grant be a infant of the age of eleven year and six  week and not above but that he attain the full age of oneandtwenty year in the  life of the bishop and of the say tenant for life and that the bishop die in r  James and that Wardgar die in James and that the defendant disturb he to  exercise the say office et si super totan means the court shall adjudge for  the plaintiff they find for the plaintiff and assess damage to eighty pound  and cost and if c this case be argue at the bar by Maynard for the plaintiff  and by ware for the defendant b Trinity James roll cro James c I burr burr Bac  Abr stram croak car er p the first question be whether this grant of this say  office to a infant of the age of eleven year to drive per see well deputy suum  in reversion after the death ofa tenant for life be good or not second whether  a office for life usual grant in possession or reversion be grant by the  bishop in reversion and confirm by the dean and chapter be good to bind his  successor as to the first all the justice hold that this grant of the office  in reversion after the death of tenant for life to a infant of the age of  eleven year to drive per see well deputy to put under as the usual grant be be  good notwithstanding the infancy and notwithstanding the opinion cite in    light and there say to be resolve Elizabeth scambler v Walter that the grant  of the office of a understewardship in possession or reversion to a infant be  void because he be incapable thereof not have knowledge to execute pro  suitably king et poplar tree a but this case be deny unless it be with this  difference where it be grant with such a clause to exercise it per see well  deputy and where he be of such a tender age that he can by intendment execute  it by himself as be a infant of three or four year of age who have not  discretion to execute it but when there be a clause to execute it per see well  deputalum suum to put under it be good enough for he may appoint a sufficient  deputy and if be do not elect such it be a forfeiture of his office and a  deputy be allow especial in ministerial office and to be approve by the judge  of that court and as a infant may present to a church because the ordinary  give the allowance whether the clerk be sufficient so the lord of the manor or  the judge of the court be to give approbation of the deputy sufficiency and if  the deputy misdemean himself in his office or be unskilful it be a forfeiture  and at the infant peril and as a infant may have a office by dissent as to be  sheriff or warden of the fleet and the like which be office of charge and of  trust so he may have a office by grant nor be the plaintiff here mere  incapable of this office especial it be grant in reversion after the death of  the tenant for life which fall not unto he until he have attain his full age  and be sufficient able to execute it also if it have fall unto he at the time  of the grant he be their of such age as by intendment he may have write the  act and order c or make election of a sufficient deputy therefore they all  conclude that the grant be good notwithstanding this exception vide Edward  dyer Henry pl Edward pl I Henry Edward pl where a office may be entail and  grant in fee Edward pl a infant may be a mayor and the act by the mayor and  commonalty shall not be avoid by the nonage of the mayor   light croak car  Edward pl   Henry grant infant present   light concern office Henry pl  contract bind a infant the second point be whether the grant of a office for  life in reversion be usual so grant by the bishop with confirmation of the  dean and chapter be good against the successor or void by the Elizabeth c S  ware object that it be void because it be not necessary when there be a  officer in possession to make another officer and when it be not necessary to  be grant it be void against the successor by the say statute as it be hold in  the case of the bishop of Sarum   but the justice resolve to the contrary for  be find to be a office usual grant in possession for life or in reversion for  life then every bishop for his time may grant the office because it be a  necessary office and ought always to be full so as when one die there may be  another officer immediate to execute the say office for the benefit of the  king subject and when it have be usual grant for life in reversion as here it  be find it have there be not any prejudice to the successor for he take not  any matter of profit from he and he have a officer who be necessary and the  case cite of the bishop of Sarum well warrant it and in the case of the bishop  of Chichester v Freedland a it be hold that the grant of a ancient office by  the bishop without increase of a new fee it be confirm by the dean and chapter  be good against the successor but the doubt there be whether the addition of a  a r ante cro James cro Elizabeth roll   Cop Cowp a ante croak car er p new fee  make all the grant or only the additional fee to be void wherefore they all  resolve in this case that this grant in reversion as it be confirm be good and  adjudge it for the plaintiff   sir George reynolds case