case cox and other against coffin and other bill against a mortgagee to compel  he to reconvey upon payment of principal and interest the plaintiff who be  heir at law exhibit a bill to redeem a mortgage make by his ancestor the case  upon the plead be thus one Butchin have occasion for money borrow it of one  fry and to secure the repayment thereof with interest he mortgage his land to  fry for two thousand year with a proviso to be void upon payment of the  principal and interest and soon afterward he die in the year the plaintiff and  her sister who be heir at law to the mortgagor exhibit their bill to redeem  and the defendant coffin be employ by they to prosecute the suit and fry the  mortgagee in his answer to that bill submit to a redemption upon payment of  the principal and interest but coffin persuade they be ignorant woman to drop  that suit allege that the land be not worth redeem fry the mortgagee some time  afterward by will devise this term and estate to one grove who he make  executor and die and then the now defendant coffin purchase it of the say  grove and by his agent Willis threaten the now plaintiff to exhibit a bill to  foreclose they of the equity of redemption the now defendant coffin after he  have purchase this term of grove for one hundred pound in consideration of so  much money pay to he assign part of the estate to one lake for five hundred  year be part of the say term of two thousand year and afterward sell the  remainder of the term to Willis now the end of this bill be that the defendant  coffin who know the plaintiff title and by unfair and fraudulent mean dissuade  they from pursue their right and afterward purchase this mortgage for himself  may be oblige to reconvey upon payment of so much money which he pay for the  purchase the counsel for the plaintiff say that there be two thing to be  consider in this cause first modern report whether this be a redeemable estate  and second if so then on what condition it shall be redeem as to the first  point it be plain that this be a redeemable estate for upon fill the first  bill fry the original mortgagee under who the defendant claim submit to a  redemption but the defendant coffin who be then solicitor for the plaintiff  dissuade then to redeem and the other defendant Willis who act for coffin  modern report er p threaten to foreclose the equity of redemption now this  show that he know it be a redeemable estate therefore the plaintiff be entitle  to redeem as to the second point upon what term the plaintiff shall redeem it  be insist that they shall redeem upon payment of the principal sum of one  hundred pound and interest which say sum of one hundred pound the defendant  coffin pay to grove upon the purchase of this term for as he be solicitor for  the plaintiff he be to be take as a trustee for they and therefore shall be  content to receive what he pay for they deduct rend and as for lake who take  the term of five hundred year of coffin this seem to be a trust for he but if  it be grant to he good fide without any trust yet he take it with his eye open  and shall not be in a better condition than coffin under who he claim  therefore it be insist for a decree to redeem c a Jason v eyres Chan case  Howard v Harris vern Manlove v ball vern Willet v Winnel vern cross v Powell  comy Rep Exton v greaves vern Floyer v Levington Peer wms a modern report  hilary term the eleven of George the first in the year in the court of  chancery the earl of Macclesfield Lord chancellor sir Joseph Jekyll Knt master  of the roll