case Snellgrove versus baily march SC Ves S b who have a bind for pound from  one Spackman deliver it to the defendant say in case I die it be you and then  you will have something this be a sufficient donation causan death to pass the  equitable interest of this bind on the intestate death vide miller v miller  Cox p W note ware v turner Ves hill v chapman bro Charles Rep Hassell v tynte  Amb Blount v burrow bro Charles Rep Ves jun SC Tate v Hilbert bro Charles Rep  a bind for pound be give by one Spackman to Sarah Baily which Sarah Baily  deliver to the defendant say in case I die it be you and then you have  something atkins er p the plaintiff as administrator to Sarah Baily have bring  this bill to have the bind deliver up Mr attorney general counsel for the  defendant cite Drury versus smith p wms and Jones versus Selby Prec in Chan  Lord chancellor I be satisfy upon the reason of the thing and the case which  have be cite that this be a sufficient donation causan death to pass the  equitable interest of this bind upon the intestate death the bill be bring  know where the bind be to have the defendant deliver it up to he the question  be whether the plaintiff be entitle to take this bind out of the defendant  custody this be not a bill bring mere upon the loss of a bind you can sue at  law without the bind for though you may give evidence of a deed at law that be  lose yet you can of a bind because you must make a profert of it so anon atk  contra totty v Nesbitt term Rep in note there be no evidence but the defendant  answer that she have the bind and by her answer she set forth the whole case  the question be whether this bind be the proper subject of such a gift  especial consider how far the court have go late in assignment of choose in  action atkins put the case if a chattel in possession have be buy by the  intestate and the bill of sale take in a three person name in trust the legal  property will have be in the trustee and only the equitable interest in the  beneficiary and trust and yet if the beneficiary and trust have deliver it  over to the defendant that will have be a good gift donation causan death as  to the equitable property this come very near the case of a choose in action  and the case be so and that in p wms particular be in point one by will  dispose of his personal estate and afterward by parole give pound bill to one  to deliver over to his nephew if the testator shall die of that sickness such  gift decree good Drury v smith p wms see S c more full ride t hard therefore  his lordship decree for the defendant and dismiss the bill but without cost