case rice clampe against edmund clampe to a avowry for copyhold land by  dissent of the seize of a a replication that a and b surrender the land by the  name of the reversion after the death of the say a and b to the use of the  plaintiff be have for b have nothing and it leaves a particular estate in a  and the seize shall have be traverse post hob cro James burr roll Rep godb  Leon roll Rep roll ab pale yellow ten   post replevin the defendant avow for  damagefeasant in the land which be parcel of the manor of c and that this land  be copyhold parcel of the say manor and of the nature of borough English and  demise to John Boreman and Margaret his wife and their heir by copy of court  roll by the name of a mese contain twelve acre of land and that John Boreman  die and Margaret he survive and take to husband John clampe and have issue the  plaintiff their old son and the avowant their young son and afterward Margaret  die seize and the land descend to the avowant as young son and heir by the  custom c who enter and take the cattle damagefeasant the plaintiff by  replication confess the grant to John Boreman and Margaret and that John  Boreman die and Margaret survive c and take to husband the say John clampe and  have issue the plaintiff and defendant but say that the say John clampe and  Margaret surrender the say land per nomen of the reversion after the death of  the say John clampe and Margaret to the use of the plaintiff and his heir who  be admit accord and afterward the say Margaret die and John clampe do survive  and afterward the say John clampe croak Elizabeth er p die the plaintiff enter  without hoc that the say land do descend to the defendant as puisne son p and  upon this replication it be demurrer in law coke for the avowant pray  judgement first for the matter in law the plaintiff plea be not sufficient for  he plead a surrender of the land by the name of a reversion after the death of  the baron and feme and by that pretence there shall he a particular estate  leave in the feme and also in the baron whereas the baron have nothing before  which can he for the surrender be void for when one be seize in fee he can by  any matter in fact give away the inheritance after his death and so leave a  particular estate in himself but peradventure it may be do by matter of record  and of that opinion be the court Henry Henry and it be absurd that by a mere  grant the baron shall have a estate for life who have nothing before second he  say there be a apparent fault in the plead for the avowant plead that croak  Elizabeth Margaret die seize and the land descend to he and the plaintiff in  his replication traverse the descent and not the die seize Henry pl and the  avowant have judgement at the end of the term notam it be move that the twelve  acre can not pass by the name of a mese but the court give no regard to it