case SANDBACK against turvey Trinity term James roll in c b Hilary term James  roll in b r in debt on bind for the defendant plead payment of l secundum form  et execution creating the plaintiff reply non to loosen predict l this be a  immaterial issue not aid by the statute Henry c or Ann c more cro car hob    light Leon sand sand cro Elizabeth Com dig Bac ab Bac ab hawk p c dougl error  of a judgement in the common plea in debt upon a obligation of two hundred  pound condition for the payment of one hundred and five pound at a day and  place the defendant plead that he pay at the say day and place the aforesaid  hundred pound quas ad to go to loosen to withhold croak throw the plaintiff  reply quod non to loosen predict one hundred and five pound at the say day and  place et hoc petit c it be find that he do not pay the hundred and five pound  and judgement be give for the plaintiff error be assign that there be not any  issue join for the defendant plead payment of the say hundred pound only and  the plaintiff say he have not pay a cro car side croak James er p the  aforesaid hundred and five pound quas c so they do not meet and there be not  any issue join and so the verdict ill and the judgement erroneous and although  it vas object that when the defendant plead that he pay prediction l quas to  loosen to withhold secundum form et execution creating it be say to be intend  the aforesaid hundred and five pound and the verdict find that he have not pay  the aforesaid hundred and five pound that that shall help the issue and  compare it to the case of hals v Bonython a where the defendant plead payment  that June such a year the plaintiff reply that he do not pay it the say that  August the same year and verdict find that he do not pay it the that day of  June and adjudge good say non allocatur for there the defendant plea be accord  to the condition and the plaintiff replication quod non to loosen the say that  day although he misname the month which be idle and the foresay day have be  sufficient but here be another sum in the plea of the defendant than be in the  condition and another sum in the replication than be in the bar and so they do  not meet and thereby the issue ill and shall not be aid by the verdict  wherefore the judgement be reverse