case ex part COYSEGAME January the d see wright v Morley Ves cook b law S c  and more full state a bind give to a in trust to secure the payment of a  annuity of pound during the joint life of sir Edward smith and petitioner the  bankrupt wife he deliver up the bind upon his last examination she apply to  the court and pray the assignee may deliver the bind to her trustee and that  the arrear of the annuity and all future payment may be make to her the  petitioner in marry Coysegame who be now a bankrupt and at the time of his  last examination he deliver lip with the rest of his estate a bind which be  give to a in trust to secure the payment of a annuity of pound ayear to the  petitioner during the joint life of sir Edward smith and the petitioner she  bring a portion of pound to the bankrupt in marriage and have nothing to  subsist upon but this annuity and pray by her petition that the assignee may  deliver the bind to her trustee and that the arrear of her annuity and all  future payment may be make to her Lord chancellor order accord consider the  creditor as stand in the place of the husband and not entitle any more than he  will have be in case he be no bankrupt to the annuity without make a provision  for her atkins for the assignee under the commission it be insist that  notwithstanding the husband and wife must have bring the action in the name of  the trustee of the bind for the annuity yet accord to the opinion in mile v  William et ux I will where a bind be make to a in trust for b who become a  bankrupt the assignee may bring the action in their own name though b must  have bring it in the name of his trustee and this show that in point of law  they be consider as have the absolute property for the benefit of the creditor  but Lord chancellor say he do not remember there be any precedent for such a  action by assignee where a bind be give to a trustee for the wife benefit and  not to herself and as this opinion in I will mile v William and his wife I  will be not upon the principal point in the case but obiter only his lordship  deny it to be law and think clear by the manner of word the clause relate to  the commissioner power of assignment of a bankrupt effect James that assignee  can only have the like remedy to recover a debt as the bankrupt himself may  have have the word as the party himself may have have in the conclusion of  that clause appear to he to be mean of the bankrupt and therefore order the  bind to be deliver by the assignee to the petitioner and the arrear and future  payment of the annuity to be pay to her for her separate use vide Bosville v  Brander p wms grey v Kentish post Worral v Marlar and Bushnam v pell Cox p wms  Jewson v Moulson post vol prior v hill bro Charles Rep