case Burdett versus rockley a sequestration which issue as mesne process  determine by the death of the party otherwise if it issue after a decree  though for a personal duty a sequestration that issue as mesne process of this  court will be discontinue and determine by the death of the party but where a  sequestration issue in pursuance of a decree and to compel the execution of it  there though the same be for a personal duty it shall not be determine by the  death of the party Sic dict Hawkins v crook atk send vide contra Bligh v earl  Darnley p wms Wharam v Broughton ves white v Hayward ves vide university  college v Foxcroft post Rowley v Bidley dick and case there cite as to the  rise and progress of sequestration vide hide v petit Ch can and case refer to  in the margin there and say sequestrator on mesne process be Accountable for  all the profit and can retain only so far as to satisfy for the contempt  Gibson v Scevington post a sergeant at arm must return non be invention before  a sequestration can issue ex part Jephson pre Ch and on a decree to account  and sequestration have against the heir it appear that the heir have take a  new estate under a limitation by the father in pursuance of a power the  sequestration be discharge anon Ch can but the sequestration do not go against  the heir until the suit be revive unless the father conveyance be plead  Colston v gardener Ch can SC from Lord nottingham ms swan n Wharam v Broughton  ub sup and will extend to land copyhold and personalty ibidem but quaere as to  copyhold Carmarthen v Hawson swan n as to the extent in which decree be say to  be equal to judgement at law it be clear lie down by the master of the roll in  Bligh v earl of Darnley that they do not bind the real asset descend as a  judgement do and that it be only by process for contempt that the land can be  bind and as to decree quod to sum up they be but as interlocutory judgement at  law smith v Haskins atk it be object that it be but for a contempt that a  sequestration issue and that the principal intent thereof be to bring the  party to a compliance and not to levy the duty though that be collateral do  Lord chancellor the sequestration bind from the very time of award the  commission and not only from the time of execute of it and its be lie on by  the commissioner for if that shall be admit then the inferior officer will  have to tie et non to tie power this be a bill against the widow and the  daughter and heir of Francis Rockley decease for a injunction to stay proceed  at law in ejectment bring by defendant on recovery in a writ of dower to have  the benefit of a sequestration grant by this court of all the estate real and  personal of the say Francis Rockley for satisfaction of the sum of pound S d  and pound S d decree to be pay by he to the plaintiff he have stand out all  process of contempt to this the defendant demurrer for that the decree be for  a personal duty and not for the land in question nor for any rend or  maintenance of or upon the same and the sequestration be only for the contempt  of the say Francis Rockley for disobey the decree be discharge by his death he  have die in and consequent the sequestration do abate and the proceed after  his death be irregular and the rather for that the decree be not revive after  the death of the say Francis Rockley and a order be thereupon make to revive  against the personal representative of Rockley Reg lib a fol afterward in  Michaelmas vacation the demurrer come on for judgement and it appear that  after the death of Rockley the plaintiff renew the commission of sequestration  by order of the court and a injunction be award to establish the commissioner  in possession and accord possession be obtain the court allow the demurrer and  the injunction which have be grant in this cause for stay of defendant proceed  at law dissolve and the rather for that after the death of Rockley no subpoena  in nature of to know facias have issue against the defendant the heir Reg lib  a fol Vernon chancery case er p