case richard rook against nicholas rook a assumpsit lie for so much in toto  for money expend have and receive and pay without show in particular how much  for each cause on a promise to pay before the plaintiff go his next journey to  l it must be aver that the time of his go be his next journey assumpsit  whereas the defendant on the February James in consideration croak James er p  he be indebt to the plaintiff in forty pound videlicet pro to visit containing  ten each allow to grow long ei it is better ac pro to visit containing ten  each allow to grow long de eoden Richardo retreat et condition et pro a  certain money summa by the plaintiff at the defendant request to one John  amias unbound for diet assume to the plaintiff that he will pay the say forty  pound to he ante start nearer journey of the plaintiff to London and allege in  facto that he upon the d February follow to take hold iter suum ad London and  come thither the that of the same month yet the defendant have not pay he the  say forty pound although often require after non assumpsit plead and verdict  for the plaintiff it be move in arrest of judgement that the declaration be  not good first because it be not show how much he be indebt for every of the  cause and so it be too general say non allocatur for it be not material be  that he be indebt so much in toto he need not to show every particular croak  throw second because he do not show that it be his neighbor iter to London for  otherwise there be no cause of action for the nonpayment before that journey  and although it be allege that it shall be so intend be in so short a time  after the bargain and no other be show yet the court hold that it be a  material exception for the duty grow upon the commencement of his next journey  and therefore he ought to show it to enable himself to the action as if the  promise have be to pay such a sum to he who first come to Paul wherefore for  this cause the declaration be hold to be ill and adjudge for the defendant