case smith versus turner eoden die upon a bill of review the error assign be  that there be Vernon chancery case no ground for make this decree more than  that it be mention in the decree that it be make by the consent of the  plaintiff counsel and he ought not to be conclude by the consent of his  counsel and that be allow to be a good error but the court will not set aside  a decree obtain by consent of counsel on both side Harrison v Rumsey ves  Bradish v gee Amb mole v smith I W and see wood v Griffith mere so infant bind  by a decree take by consent though no reference to the master but not usual  make without a reference wall v Bushby bro Ch Rep but the remedy lie for the  party against his counsel c and also against such a decree if obtain by fraud  and covin Bradish v gee ub sup as also that the decree be make by the master  of the roll alone and he can by his commission make a decree without the  assistance of two master vide Merreitt v Eastwicke ante and as to the judicial  authority of the master of the roll as former consider vide a book entitle the  legal judicature in chancery state in which the question be much agitate as to  the force of a decree at the roll at this time stat Geo two cap et vide brown  v Higgs Ves note this case not be warrant by the record it be think fit to  insert the word of the record itself which be as follow videlicet Jupiter  fivepercent tax die novembris year royal power carol favorable king the  thirtieth sexto inter edwardum smith bar quer and a turner Vid defend Lord  keeper the matter upon the plea and demurrer put in by the say defendant to  the plaintiff bill of review come this day to be hear and debate before the  right honourable the Lord keeper of the great seal of England in the presence  of counsel learned on both side upon open the matter of the say defendant plea  which be ground on a submission or consent of the now plaintiff smith counsel  to a decree make in a former cause wherein the defendant turner be plaintiff  and the now plaintiff smith defendant and therefore the decree in the former  cause against which the plaintiff bill of review seek relief be ground on a  consent ought not to be impeach or prejudice by the now plaintiff bill upon  debate of the matter of the bill plea and demurrer this court hold the say  plea and demurrer to be good and sufficient and do order that the same do  stand and be allow Reg lib b fol Vernon chancery case er p