case the king against lady onebi alias truder a outlawry for not come to  church reverse for not state that the county court be hold in and for the  county a outlawry on a indictment for not come to church may be reverse for  defect of form indictment for not come to any church or chapel for the space  of a month contra form to cause to stand for want of appearance process of  outlawry issue and a exigent be return thereupon the defendant bring a writ of  error to reverse the outlawry and the error which I assign over as far as be  the usual fault be not say the county court be hold pro comitat a objection  per curian the James c S that no indictment c nor any proclamation outlawry or  other proceed thereupon shall be avoid discharge or reverse by reason of any  default in form or lack of form or other defect whatsoever other than by  direct traverse to the point of not come to church whereof such person or  person shall be indict but the same indictment shall stand and be in force and  be proceed upon any such default of form or other defect whatsoever  notwithstanding to the which I answer at another day that it be true the  statute include outlawry and proclamation and shower KB say none of they shall  be annul for any lack of form but if that construction be make of it then it  will be inconsistent and contradictory in itself now this be all but one  entire sentence and the whole must be take together the latter word must  explain or control the former else no outlawry can be reverse at all but upon  conformity whereas the statute say other than by direct traverse to the point  of not come to church and that the indictment shall stand good which admit it  may be reverse but then the party must plead not guilty to the indictment  several outlawry be reverse in the Lord Scroggs time I confess I can remember  that notice be take of this objection but at last the outlawry be reverse and  she plead not guilty and this per totan curian a see the case of king v Wilkes  burr where a outlawry be reverse because in the sheriff return to the capias  cum proclamation the name of the county in which the county court be situate  be not state and because the county court be not state to be hold for the  county this objection be also take in king v Barrington term Rep and the court  seem to think that it will not now prevail but the outlawry be reverse on  another point and in the case of king v yandel the writ of proclamation  require the sheriff to proclaim the party in open court in the sheriff county  not say county court and hold good term Rep shower KB er p