case gwyn against hook in chancery July S c will the testator Griffith daw  have two brother Francis and Thomas by will devise his estate to his  granddaughter and heir at law Elizabeth lady Bulkeley in the follow word I  give and bequeathe all my land and tenement to my grandchild the lady Bulkeley  during her natural life and after her decease to the right heir male of I the  say Griffith daw for ever and die lady Bulkeley upon her marriage with the  defendant hook settle the premise upon herself and her husband for their life  and the life of the survivor and after the decease of the survivor to the use  of the defendant his heir and assign for ever lady Bulkeley die and upon her  death the plaintiff who be the grandchild of Francis the testator next brother  bring their bill against the defendant to be let into possession of these  estate under the will of Griffith daw to who they be also by lady Bulkeley die  without issue become heir at law the point of law have already come in  question upon a demurrer on this very will in the case of daw v Ferrer a will  a lady Bulkeley have former be marry to Ferrer the Lord chancellor upon the  hear of the cause make modern report a case for the opinion of the judge of  the court of king bench whether the plaintiff be entitle to the estate in  question by virtue of the will of Griffith daw the judge now certify their  opinion in the follow word upon hear counsel on both side a see the argument  of the counsel in this case will a and consideration of this case we be of  opinion that the plaintiff be not entitle to the estate in question by virtue  of the will of the say Griffith daw date the fourteenth of November for we  conceive that Francis the brother of the testator under who the plaintiff  claim can not take by the description of right heir male of the testator  Hardwicke Lord chancellor now declare himself satisfy with the opinion and  dismiss the bill b it be say by the counsel and agree to by the Lord  chancellor that this differ from brown v Barkham precedent in Chan vern the  limitation be there to the heir male of the body and this be say to be the  same as sterling v Ettrick precedent in Chan b modern report er p