case MESERETT ux versus MESERETT all see Keeling v smith Ch d also note to  creagh v Wilson vern Lord keeper Feb Eq can ab pl S c a devise pound to b her  daughter and that if she marry under twentyone without consent of the executor  or major part of they the legacy to go to the child of her sister the wife of  c and make c and two other executor b be at the house of c there marry his son  by a former wife with his privity be under twentyone b and her husband bring a  bill for the legacy c in favour of his other child insist the legacy forfeit  the other executor confess they have notice of the courtship and do not  contradict or disapprove of it decree the pound to the plaintiff there be at  least a tacit consent Hester tanden devise to the plaintiff maria her only  child the sum of three hundred pound a pearl necklace and her jewel but if she  marry before the age of twentyone without the consent of the executor or the  major part of they in such case what she have devise to her daughter the  plaintiff shall go to the child of her sister the wife of the defendant David  Mesgrett the word of the bequest be to Susanna maria meaning the wife of the  plaintiff pound necklace jewel c and do recommend her and her education to her  the say testatrixs say executor and three of the defendant and do further will  that if the plaintiff wife shall marry before the age of twentyone year unless  with the consent of the executor or such as shall be live or if she shall  refuse to be educate as her executor or two of they shall appoint in either of  the say case she the say testatrix declare she give the plaintiff wife nothing  but do give the same over to the child of her sister Mesgrett that shall be  live and make the say plaintiff wife residuary legatee r l and make the  defendant David Mesgrett one tanden and Chawell executor the plaintiff maria  be eleven year old at the death of her mother live for some time afterward  with Chawell one of the executor and be there court by the plaintiff her now  husband the son of David Mesgrett by a former wife Vernon chancery case and  afterward the plaintiff maria remove to the house of the say David Mesgrett  where the marriage be have with the privity of the say David Mesgrett although  he now set up a pretence that the legacy be forfeit and devise over to his  child by his second wife the sister of the testatrix and the other executor by  answer confess that they have notice such match be carry on do not contradict  or disapprove of it nor remove the young woman as they may have do Vernon  chancery case er p Lord keeper decree for the plaintiff it plain appear there  be at least a tacit consent and the will not prescribe the manner of the  consent to be in write or otherwise and look upon it as a fraud in David  Mesgrett in promote the marriage and afterward to pretend a forfeiture for  want of a consent to gain the legacy to his child by his last wife the court  declare it sufficient appear that the plaintiff intermarry with the consent of  all three executor and that the condition of the say will be perform Reg lib b  fol vide creagh ux v Wilson all ante and case cite in note there