case the parish OF saint Giles in the field against the parish OF Weybridge in  the county OF surrey a remove by certificate from b to c take a apprentice who  serve out his time at c and life two year can be remove with his master S c  fort Simons a tailor by trade a inhabitant of saint Giles parish remove to  Weybridge in Surrey with a certificate and there take a apprentice who serve  out his time set up his trade and live two year in Weybridge but his old  master be become Chargeable the justice of the peace make a order to remove  Simons and his say apprentice as part of his family to the parish of saint  Giles the order be move to be quash because the word family must not be take  in so large a extent and this term the court give their resolution that the  order be ill holt chief justice say the question be whether this apprentice  ought to be remove with his master by the word family in the statute will c  the Act say that if any person or person shall come into any parish to reside  and shall bring a certificate from any other parish thereby own and  acknowledge the person or person mention in the say certificate as inhabitant  legal settle in the parish from whence such certificate shall come be or they  shall oblige the say parish to receive and provide for the person mention in  the say certificate together with his or her family as inhabitant of that  parish whenever he she or they shall happen to become Chargeable to the parish  to which such certificate be give and then and not before it shall and may be  lawful for any such person and his or her child though bear in that parish not  have otherwise acquire a legal settlement there to be remove and settle in the  parish or place from whence such certificate be bring now this apprentice  never come with a certificate beside the statute say any such person that be  the person mention in the certificate and his or her child though bear in that  parish that be they that come along with he shall go back and no other than  they and the child bear after and for modern report they there be a special  provision in the Act second he inhabit two year after the apprenticeship which  be another settlement therefore he be well settle at Weybridge and can be  remove to saint Giles whereto Powell justice accord powys justice say it be  like the case of saint bride be v the Savoy where a lodger in the Savoy come  into saint bride be parish and rend a shop in fleet street but gain no  settlement there but take a servant or apprentice who serve his time with the  lodger this be adjudge a good settlement for the servant or apprentice though  the lodger or master himself have never gain one because the service be  perform in the parish of saint bride be it gain the servant a legal settlement  and the notice to be give accord to the statute do not extend to a servant or  a apprentice gold justice say see that he have live two year in Weybridge  after he be out of his time he can not be remove but if the master have be  remove during his apprenticeship it have be another case a by Ann c S if any  person whatsoever shall be a apprentice bind by indenture to any certificate  person and not afterward have gain a legal settlement in the parish such  apprentice by virtue of such apprenticeship shall not gain or be adjudge to  have any settlement in such parish by reason of such apprenticeship but every  such apprentice shall have his settlement in such parish as if he have not be  bind apprentice to such person as aforesaid and see Ivinghoe v Stonebridge  stram king v Clisthydon burr S c king v seller will king v Bishopswill burr S  c king v Spotland burr S c king v Weddington burr S c king v saint Peter term  Rep king v Hinckley term Rep a modern report er p