Adam v er freeman and win it be not necessary to set out the proceed in a  inferior court in a plea to a action of trespass in a superior court in a  action of trespass the plaintiff declare in one court for a assault and false  imprisonment for the space of fourteen day and in another for a assault and  false imprisonment for the space of three month the defendant freeman plead in  his justification that a plaint be levy and process pray at his suit in a  inferior court that such proceed be thereupon have that a capias be award that  the plaintiff by virtue of this capias be arrest and detain in custody  fourteen day and that he be then bring into court and commit for the residue  of the term of three month the other defendant who be the officer by who the  arrest be make plead a like plea in his justification upon a demurrer to these  plead the question be whether it be necessary forboth or either of the  defendant to show that a summons issue before the capias wasawarded the plead  be both hold to be good sayer and by lee Cb J it be heretofore necessary for  the plaintiff in a action in the inferior court who will justify a  imprisonment under a capias award by that court to set out in his plea of  justification all the proceed anterior to the award of the capias but it be  never necessary for the officer by who the arrest be make to do this it have  however for some year pass be hold sufficient for the plaintiff in the action  in the inferior court to allege in such plea that a plaint be levy and process  pray in the inferior court and that superinde taliterprocessum to be that a  capias be award without set out all the proceed between the levy of the plaint  and the award of the capias in the case of gwynne v pool Lutw it be lie down  that it be sufficient to do this and it be in that case hold express that it  be not necessary to show in such plea that a summons issue before the award of  the capias the authority of the case of gwynne v pool have be frequent  recognize and the authority of the case of read v Wilmot vent in which it be  hold that it be necessary to show in such plea that a summons issue before the  capias be award have be as frequent deny it have be say that it be not allege  in the plea of freeman that the cause of the action in the inferior court  arise within the jurisdiction of that court but it be allege that a plaint be  levy in the inferior court for a cause of action arise within the jurisdiction  of that court this be a sufficient allegation that the cause of that action do  arise within the jurisdiction of that court sayer that the fact whether it  sayer er p do arise therein may have be traverse it be moreover lie down in  the case of gwynne v pool that it be not necessary to allege express in a plea  similar to that in the present case that the cause of the action in the  inferior court arise within the jurisdiction of that court for that it be  sufficient if it appear in the plea that the cause of that action do arise  within the jurisdiction of that court