case wallis versus Brightwell Lord Macclesfield Eq can ab pl one by will make  in England devise a annuity in trust for his wife out of land in Ireland the  testator and his wife and the trustee reside in England the annuity shall be  pay in England and the estate bear the charge of the return the testator  Brightwell be seize in fee of land in Ireland and he and his wife live in  England by his will in de in England devise his land in Ireland to a trustee  who also live in England for year in trust out of the rend and profit to pay  pound per annum to his wife for life insist on that the fund for this payment  be land in Ireland and no place appoint where the money be to be pay this  pound per annum annuity ought to be aid in Irish money which be less in value  than English money our shilling go there for d and by the same reason there  ought to be a deduction for the charge of remit the money from Ireland to  England by saint g c the currency of Ireland be assimilate to that of great  Britain but by Lord chancellor the will be make in England and the husband and  wife and trustee all live in England peer William and this be a provision for  a wife too the pound per annum shall be intend pound per annum of that country  where the will be make see Phipps v earl of anglesea vol it can be conceive  that the testator think of send his wife every year to Ireland to fetch her  annuity if one by will make in England give legacy of pound it must be intend  English money and it will be the same thing though charge on land in Ireland  and by the same reason that a single payment of pound will be take to be  English money so shall a annual payment of pound receive such construction and  this be still strong in regard it appear on the proof that the testator have  make lease of part of his Irish estate reserve just so much rend to be pay in  London free from tax as will be sufficient to pay all the annuity give by the  will wherefore the plaintiff have a decree to be pay her pound annuity in  English money without any charge of remittance and with cost and in Pierson v  Garnet bro c c before sir l Kenyon master of the roll on the that of march his  honour hold this point to have be conclusive determine by Phipps v Ei art of  anglesea and Wallis v Brightwell et vide sander v drake atk Malcolm v Martin  bro c c cockerel v barber Ves peer William er p