baily against Monday a parson make a lease for year which be confirm this do  not determine by his death as by nonresidence SC I vent keb Bac Abr Cowp term  Rep ejectment and upon non culp and a special verdict the case be a vicar have  make a lease for year do after upon the eleventh of September the first lease  be unexpired make a new lease for twentyone year to commence at Michaelmas  next render the ancient rend and more Payable at four day or within twenty day  after which lease be confirm by the bishop be patron and ordinary and by the  dean and chapter the vicar die his successor make a new lease to the lessor of  the plaintiff upon which this ejectment be bring and the case be twice argue  at bar videlicet this term by Thursby for the plaintiff and turner for the  defendant and hill by sir William Jones for the plaintiff and sir Richard  Hardres for the defendant and after in Trinity term judgement be give for the  plaintiff by the whole court videlicet hale Twysden Rainsford and wile in this  case three point be argue saint whether the lease of a parson or vicar so  confirm be void by his death accord to what be say to be adjudge in mott and  hale case cro upon the statute of nonresidence videlicet if death levinz be a  nonresidence within this statute and resolve by the whole court it be not for  a nonresidence within the statute be a nonresidence voluntary and punishable  by the statute but a dead man be not punishable and nonresidence may be excuse  by sickness   butler and Goodales case and more pl by the exhibition of the  ordinary and in that case of mott and hale though report by croak to be  adjudge sir Francis more say in his report of it the court be divide in  opinion in that point the whole court agree that the reservation of this rend  at four day or within twenty day after do not make the lease void it be for  the advantage of the successor as suppose his predecessor die after the four  day and within the twenty all agree that this lease make the lth of September  for twentyone year to commence at Michaelmas next be a lease in reversion and  therefore void but hale say the first lease be in be do not make this a lease  in reversion but a concurrent lease which a vicar may make the former lease be  to determine within three year to which the rest say nothing Twysden only seem  to disagree thereto