case the parish OF saint clement against the parish OF saint Andrew Holborn  the session may vacate a order make in the same session SC salk ante a appeal  by one parish from a order of justice for the removal of a poor person from  the other parish to they at the beginning of the session the order be confirm  and afterward at the same session another order be make for the reversal of  the original order a writ of certiorari be now bring the order of confirmation  and also the order of reversal be both return et per curian first the  judgement of the justice be in their breast and alterable by they all the same  session second if they make a subsequent order direct contrary to a former of  the same session in the same cause the subsequent one be a absolute repeal of  the former be inconsistent with it though there be no express word of repeal  in the second order as if at the old Bailey c one indict of felony will not  plead and judgement of pain fort et dure be give against he now by Geo c in  felony and piracy the judgement shall be the same on stand mute as if the  prisoner bad confess the indictment a and he be carry away and the next day he  alter his mind he shall be admit to plead and if he be convict be shall have  judgement to be hang which be a supersedeas or set aside of the first  judgement Powell justice say if there be two act of parliament direct contrary  one to another the same session the last shall only be take for law see king v  cator burr king v Davis case cro law b holt chief justice if they both shall  general refer to the same session I do not know which to take for law and he  quote a case of the town of Colchester here some year ago exact like this and  for that the second order do not express repeal the first order and that the  justice do return they both as order the second order be quash and the first  set up and the chief justice put a case that be in chancery a day or two  before which be this a appeal from a decree of the master of the roll and the  question be whether new evidence that bad arise between the say bear and  decree and the appeal shall be receive and it be hold by the Lord keeper by  Powell justice and holt chief justice that all the matter at the roll have  fall to the ground upon the appeal and it be now the same thing as if nothing  bad ever be do in it and by consequence the new evidence ought to be admit but  at last the matter here be refer by consent to the three judge or any two of  they to arbitrate modern er p