a issue be direct to try the bankruptcy of John ware upon trial at bar in b r  he be find to become bankrupt Aug and now upon the equity reserve plaintiff  trustee for the SouthSea company pray a account and to set aside conveyance  that John ware have make since his become bankrupt the nature of the case as  state by Lord Chan be of a gentleman have a very great estate and not much  indebt except the demand by the SouthSea company by equity case abridge er p  deed of conveyance of and August and by subsequent deed all the real and  personal estate of I W even to Hushold good be vest in trustee to pay pretend  creditor the son join with the father but not one of the pretend creditor and  no distress from any creditor c among other trust be the extraordinary power  in the deed of September for I W to charge any other debt and last of all the  whole surplus of all the estate be vest in the bankrupt son then come the  marriage article in June and therein every one of the former deed be recite to  be in consideration of the marriage of the son with a b and pound portion but  not prove pay the surplus agree to be subject to a term of year to pay pound a  year to I W for life if he shall particular demand it and then for his son and  his wife then I W be to purchase land of pound per Ann in tail general to his  son remainder to his right heir with power as to portion for child and power  for trustee to provide Coach and horse for I W then there be another deed of  soon date by the son subject the manor of to some use a bill be bring by the  assignee to set aside these deed c a issue be direct and the jury find I W  equity case abridge bankrupt August be the date of the first deed of release  by which that deed be overreach and the judge certify that this deed be the  Act of bankruptcy as be make to defraud his creditor Lord chancellor the  question be what the consequence of this verdict be saint in law and next in  equity at law this deed and all subsequent one be void but it be object from  the stat James that the Commission of bankruptcy be not take out till November  above five year after the Act of bankruptcy and by a clause in that statute  purchaser in such case be not to be impeach c but his lordship hold that this  clause only affect purchaser good fide without notice of the fraud and Act of  bankruptcy and here the son must have have notice of the Act of bankruptcy so  that the son be not protect by this deed next the consequence of this verdict  in equity and here his lordship take notice that there be circumstance of  actual fraud and that here appear a long series from the power in the deed of  September to charge the estate with any other debt be fraud apparent because  it reserve in effect the whole estate in the bankrupt himself c the next  consideration be bow far the several defendant be to be affect and this be to  be consider in two respect saint under the deed from prior to the article dly  how upon the marriage article listen as to the deed prior to the article they  concern the trustee for the pretend creditor and those creditor but no proof  of any real debt and the first deed for that reason find void and therefore  this be out of the case then the question be under those deed how it stand  with the son and his lordship hold that he be affect with the Act of  bankruptcy and fraud be party to the first deed c and at best it be all  voluntary as to he and the surplus in all the subsequent deed be reserve to he  next as to the marriage and here his lordship say be the only appearance of  difficulty so as to the person provide for and as to I W himself he can  partake of the consideration all the party to be consider be ware be son and  his intend wife and the issue saint as to the son his case be not immediate  the marriage article he have notice of the bankruptcy of his father before it  be object that the son be to be consider as a purchaser by the article and the  statute not mention notice and where the Commission be not sue out within five  year c but his lordship hold that article in equity be the same as actual  conveyance at law and not to be impeach in equity but hold that the son can  take nothing under the article but what he have before but suppose it so his  lordship say the clause in the stat James not to be consider in the large  sense contend for so as to extend to all purchase but hold that this clause be  to be compare to the clause in the stat Elizabeth cap which provide against  purchaser have notice of the fraud the stat James take notice of the former  act against bankrupt and be for further provision for creditor therefore his  lordship hold this case like the case and warrant by the construction make on  the several statute about lease by ecclesiastical person vent baily and  graymousecolored the last resolution in that case and so hold that all the  statute against bankrupt be to be construe together and to be consider all as  one statute and no pretence but that the son have notice and therefore he the  son can protect himself under the statute next as to his wife and issue the  son wife for what appear be a innocent person no evidence to show her father  have any other notice than what appear equity case abridge from the deed but  his lordship think notice of the deed be no equity case abridge er p notice of  the fraudulent intent of these deed other than as to the son who be party c  and if the son wife have not notice of the bankruptcy she can be affect in  equity by the bankruptcy next as to the issue of the marriage saint as to the  heir of the body of the son that be a estatetail in he and his lordship agree  that in marriage article where the limitation be to the heir of the body by  the wife there it shall be carry into strict settlement but otherwise where  the limitation be general to all the issue and that this be the real intent  appear by the provision of pound which be express for the issue of the  marriage and extend to the old son as well as to the rest of the ChildrenThis  pound be secure by a power and trust and his lordship hold that the issue be  to be affect with the notice to the father and mother and trustee as to  plaintiff objection that the provision be of the surplus only after the  fictitious debt pay this will be strange and their provision ought to be what  be real due as to the bankrupt power to charge other debt his lordship hold  his join in the marriage article be a extinguishment of that power and amount  to a revocation ergo decree the marriage article to be set aside as to all the  use except as to the jointure of the wife and the pound for the issue mich  read and ware ms rep vin Abr pl SC and decree Lord Chan say this be a  extraordinary case and he believe none like it before and hope never will  again and that therefore it be incumbent on the court to do all they can to  prevent the like and observe that here appear a scheme of fraud through many  year to defraud just creditor ibidem p Lord Chan in SC declare that he have  speak with the c I of b r who have tell he that the jury find John ware  bankrupt from execute the deed of August and that no Act of bankruptcy be  prove before or after but the execution of that deed and no other Act of  bankruptcy till vin Abr n concern assignment make by a bankrupt just before  his bankruptcy in order TO give preference TO some OF his creditor