case thomas versus freeman Eq can ab pl S c a possibility can be assign but it  may be release I S the beneficiary and trust of a term upon his wife join in a  sale of part of her jointure by deed direct and appoint that his trustee after  his and his wife decease shall assign the residue of the term to his wife  daughter under who the plaintiff claim when she shall attain the age of  twentyone or be marry after the decease of her father and mother the daughter  be marry she and her husband in the lifetime of her father and mother assign  the term to the plaintiff question if such a possibility can be assign and  plaintiff well entitle in equity Lord keeper equitas sequitur law and that  which be the rule of law must be the rule here it be a notion that have obtain  at law that a possibility be not assignable but no Vernon chancery case reason  for it if res integran but the law be not so unreasonable but to allow that it  may be release vide Fulwoods case   Rep b Lampetts case   Rep b the law hold  it to be unreasonable that there shall be a encumbrance on a man estate that  can no way be discharge and therefore do allow that a possibility may be  release and dismiss the plaintiff bill but without cost that Oct there be mere  a entry of dismissal without cost Reg lib b fol it be clear that in equity a  possibility may be both release and assign Theobald v Duffay cite in not to  wind v Jekyl p wms Jewson v Moulson atk and the question say to be now at rest  even at law arg at the bar spragg v Binkes Ves so by commissioner assignment  bankrupt possibility will pass Higden v Williamson p wms stat Geo d cap the  word of which be all such effect of which the party be possess or interest in  or whereby he have or may expect any profit possibility of profit benefit or  advantage whatsoever Jewson v Moulson ub sup brown v Heathcote atk but it must  be such a possibility as the bankrupt can disclose upon his examination moth v  from Amb which be the case of a possibility arise under a settlement of land  to settlor for life remainder to his wife remainder to the child of the  marriage as settlor and his wife shall appoint and for want of appointment to  the first and every other son in tail male remainder to daughter reversion in  fee to settlor settlor and his wife die without make any appointment leave two  child whether and Thomas who die Thomas have survive whether leave the  bankrupt his heir and the court of opinion this not a possibility within the  stat Geo d it can not be assign or release nor disclose upon bankrupt  examination so husband may assign wife possibility if for a valuable  consideration Bates v Dandy atk so in general upon consideration Robinson v  Bavasor vin ab pl and possibility will go to executor or administrator anon  vent Pinbury v Elkin post arg so a possibility if couple with a interest be  devisable Jones all v very term Rep where the subject be much discuss and the  lead case state by Kenyon chief justice very v Philips Ves jun as to  possibility and choose en action be put on the same foot vide wind v Jekyl p  wms note in wind v Jekyl ub sup and in wright v wright ves in note Fearne  count Rem p be refer to on this point but the editor have not be able to find  any thing on the subject there in moth v from Amb the master of the roll say  that hidgen v Williamson p wms be the occasion of the stat Geo d cap and see  Geo c sec Vernon chancery case er p