case sander versus DEHEW distinguish Bates v Johnson John follow Mumford v  Stohwasser l r Eq refer to Bailey v barn Ch on question of notice see  conveyance Act pound Vict c S sacred scripture June Eq can ab pi a purchaser  or mortgagee shall not protect himself by take a conveyance from a trustee  after notice of the trust for by take such conveyance he become the trustee  himself whether baily be possess of a term for year make a voluntary  settlement thereof in trust for herself for life remainder to her daughter  Isabel a barn for life remainder to the child of Isabel by Mr barn her then  husband Isabel a for pound mortgage the land in question to the plaintiff who  pretend he have no notice of the settlement Isabel a in the mortgagedeed be  call the daughter and heir of John baily the plaintiff hear of it get a  assignment of the term from the trustee per cur though a purchaser may buy in  a encumbrance or lie hold on any plank to protect himself vide Edmund v Povey  all ante Vol yet he shall not protect himself by the take a conveyance from a  trustee after he have notice of the trust for by take a conveyance with notice  of the trust he himself become the trustee and must not to get a plank to save  himself be guilty of a breach of trust and yet a purchaser have be allow to  defend himself by buy in a old statute or mortgage though nothing be due upon  it or though he come undue by it Lord Huntington v Greenville ante Vol and  case cite in Hitchcox v Sedgwick ante p and see brace v marlbro p wms and the  plaintiff bill be bring against the Vernon chancery case child of Isabel a to  foreclose they the court refuse so to do say if he may be suffer to protect  himself by thus get in the legal estate they will not carry it on by a decree  in equity to foreclose note in this case it be object that the plaintiff can  not be a innocent purchaser without notice because Isabel who make the  mortgage have no title but under the settlement and as to her be call daughter  and heir of John baily it be know that the estate be only a chattel if it have  be pretend to be a inheritance some deed or settlement must have be produce to  make it so note in this case the plaintiff have also buy in a mortgage make by  whether baily herself which though subsequent to the settlement that be  voluntary be a good mortgage and yet after a voluntary settlement a man can  devise the same estate though for the payment of debt nor be such a settlement  revocable bale v Newton ante Vol et vide villers v Beaumont ibidem Vernon  chancery case er p