case STYART against roland what shall be evidence of a P  of mutuor debt for  ten pound pro eastern quod cum the defendant have account with the plaintiff  of diverse sum as due and upon that account be find in arrear eight pound per  quod action to grow progressively to have the say eight pound at any time  etian the say defendant have borrow of the say plaintiff ten pound to be pay  on request de who indeed separalibus denarior sum this defendant afterward  satisfy eight pound yet the ten pound have not pay plea nil debet on the trial  they give in evidence only eight pound which I urge can not be evidence of the  P  of mutuor for that be one entire contract and another contract for eight  pound be not the same they have declare upon and of that opinion be the Lord  chief justice holt then to prove the accuse computasset they prove that the  defendant and plaintiff wife reckon that the defendant have borrow at one time  forty shilling at another time forty shilling and at another time four pound  and this come to eight pound and he promise to pay it I urge that this can not  maintain a accuse computasset for that it be only a reckon on one side for  there be neither payment nor deduction on the other and at that rate say  shower KB one and one be two will make a account but holt chief justice  overrule I that it be good evidence of a account and so they have a verdict  quoad reckon for the plaintiff and quoad resid for the defendant then I move  in arrest of judgement that no judgement can be on this for the plaintiff  because the verdict be repugnant to and different from the declaration for the  declaration acknowledge part of both the sum to be receive and consequent part  of the eight pound to be receive and the jury have find the contrary that  there be nothing due on the P  of mutuor and that the whole eight pound in the  accuse computasset be due so that they have find the plaintiff declaration to  be false but by dolbin justice the exception be too nice and by holt chief  justice the ten pound if receive of any of the two sum be receive out of the  several sum and so by the court the plaintiff have his judgement shower KB  trinity term the three of William and mary in the king bench sir John holt Knt  chief justice sir William dolben Knt sir William Gregory Knt sir Giles eyres  Knt justice sir George Treby Knt attorney general sir John summer Knt  solicitor general