bowl against atkins hill pound car rot tithe in Dism Br in debt on Edward the  jury find a special verdict that the land in question be parcel of the abbey  of Abington and hold by prescription discharge of tithe in the hand of he and  his tenant and he h alien to Allsouls college who make a lease to the  defendant and by Holloway pro plaintiff this lessee shall pay tithe none be  capable of this immunity but spiritual body as to the person and there be  another incident inseparable to immunity which be that the land remain parcel  of the abbey and the college can prescribe under the abbey no more than a  bishop who title within time of memory Hub be not sufficient I Cr Morehunt  against come crook pro defendant that the college be discharge this case  remain at the commonlaw and not within the personal privilege aforesaid and  Keble though a layman can prescribe in non decimand yet beginning his  prescription in a spiritual corporation he may and a prescription bare be a  discharge be intend by composition which can now be show as Slade against  drake and Keble er p this title stand alone as at commonlaw and needs not the  aid of any statute as the other four do which sometime be charge but by their  person discharge as be Hub and this prescription shall though in the hand of  spiritual person suppose a real consideration in its original as Cr f n b Cr  Nash against molins and Leond and therefore shall not die with they also the  verdict do not find they be immunes but that they be discharge a mere layman  as Evesq Winchesters case   beginning his prescription in a spiritual person  as Cr crouch against friar of a copyholder Seld hist tithe ass the king  patentee may be discharge but per curian this be mean of fermors not patentee  in fee the college be spiritual person and a appropriation may be make to they  and its here find that the parsonage of Lenknor be appropriate to they and  dyer Trinity college in Cambridge be hold within a licence to devise to  spiritual person and Cr Cooper against Evesq Lincoln a interruption do not  binder the prescription no more do the change of the corporation h in the  statute of Edward there be a proviso that none shall be charge to pay that  have by prescription be discharge Twisden say in the case of the forest of  Savernacle it be agree that the king patentee shall pay tithe which the court  agree and say that the case of Sydnam against Holmes Cr pl have be agree for  law in all the court of Westminster but per curian if the college can be  maintain to be a spiritual corporation they may thus prescribe in discharge  Adjornatur