case Lord RANELAUGH versus sir John champante do you Eq can ab pl pre Ch S c  bind execute in England for a debt in Ireland shall carry but per cent  interest the court upon the account allow the defendant but pound per cent per  and for a debt contract in Ireland because the bind for secure of it be  execute here in England say vide the report of this case in Eq can ab and pre  Ch ub sup where say that Irish interest be allow and it seem former to have be  clear that interest must be pay accord to the law of the country where the  debt be contract and not accord to that where it be sue for Lord dungannon v  Hackett Tr lane v Nicholls Eq can ab pl ekins v e company p wms bro p c SC  Stapleton v Conway Ves but then the security must be execute in such country  for where a will make in England devise a rend charge out of a estate in  Ireland it be hold it I e interest shall be accord to the English value the  will be make here case on the earl of Donegalls will Eq can ab ub sup so in  case of settlement and will Phipps v earl of anglesea p wms Wallis v  Brightwell p wms but in Stapleton v Conway ub sup Hardwicke Lord chancellor  seem to imply a distinction between contract and voluntary disposition where  nothing be say about interest for there on a charge by voluntary settlement  upon a estate in the island of Nevis he consider the court as have a  discretion to fix the rate of interest and fix it at per cent note it be not  state in that report whether the settlement be execute in England and the  contract be consider as make where the security be it shall seem a specialty  be execute Connor v earl of Bellamont atk send vide sander v drake atk where  say per Lord chancellor if note give at Jamaica it must be pay in current  money but as to certain security execute in great Britain on property in  Ireland or the colony and which under the aforesaid case will bear English  interest only it be by stat Geo d cap enact that all mortgage and security  execute in great Britain upon property in Ireland or the colony hear a  interest not exceed per cent shall be valid unless the money lend shall be  know at the time to exceed the value of the property pledge the rule however  still hold where the interest be above per cent and it seem the act protect  such bind only as be enter into as collateral security for money lend on  mortgage but not those on mere personal contract vide driver v span t Rep and  further as to the operation of the act on the then previous and future loan  Scott v Nesbit bro Ch Rep arg as to the case of legacy where will make in  Ireland the west Indies c the rule be that the residence of the person devise  must decide it sander v drake atk Pierson v Garnet bro Ch Rep determine on the  authority of sander v drake and the other case Raymond v Brodbelt Ves which be  the case of a legacy of Jamaica currency decree to be pay with Jamaica  interest send vide Bourke v ricketts Ves before grant master of the roll which  be also a case of bequest of a legacy Jamaica currency where this point of the  subject and the case be state and a good deal consider and the doctrine seem  to be place by his honour rather upon particular circumstance e g of direction  to remit country where legatee may sue fund be here and in the country where  testator reside c than upon any determinate general principle Vernon chancery  case er p