case mason against hanson a declaration by a administrator that administration  be commit to he by a b peculiar of c in the cathedral of d be good after  verdict without show the authority of a b to grant it S c show debt for rend  by a administrator due in the lifetime of the intestate upon nil debet plead  they be at issue and the plaintiff have a verdict it be move in arrest of  judgement that the plaintiff have make out no title for he have set forth that  administration be commit to he by the official aweinspiring man John hall  praebendarii praebend et personal jurisdiction de Brampton in church of to an  bishop de Lincoln and do not say that it do belong to he to grant  administration c this official be neither bishop ordinary or archdeacon and  therefore it shall not be intend that he have a authority if not show by the  plaintiff it be otherwise in case of a defendant Morgan v William cro  Elizabeth temple v temple cro Elizabeth Skidmore v Winston cro Elizabeth  marshal v Ledsham style Petto v ruddock side a this be in a peculiar  jurisdiction and therefore in entitle himself the plaintiff ought to say who  administration to stretch out c and show that he have a lawful power to grant  it Mayhew v flower side slow v Wilmot sand b for it shall not be presume to be  prove at the trial he may have a peculiar jurisdiction to be exempt only from  the visitation of the bishop but not to grant administration e contra this may  have be a good objection upon a demurrer but it be cure by the verdict and now  by Ann c which extend the car c to judgement upon confession nothing to say or  non sum shape it be enact that the default of allege of the bring into court  letter of administration shall not impede the judgement except the same be  particular set down and show for cause of demurrer see Crawford v Whittal  dougl notorious facts c since the statute of car c and before the make that  statute it have be hold that in a action bring by a administrator omit profert  hic in curian litter administration see ld ray ld ray Com dig pleader d Bac  Abr d be good after verdict so the judgement in this case be affirm modern er  p