Bellew vers Aylmer in to know facias against executor no cost Sayers law of  cost what judgement may be reverse in toto and what in part only in a to know  facias against a executor execution be award and then the record go on with a  to look at closely be etian that the plaintiff shall have cost it be admit  that the W c which give cost on a to know facias do not extend to executor and  therefore the judgement for cost be erroneous but then it come to be the  question whether the court shall reverse the whole judgement or only quoad the  cost and fazakerley for the executor insist to have it reverse in toto for  that it be one entire judgement on which they can not have several execution  cro Elizabeth there be damage give to the crown in a quare hinder and the  judgement reverse in toto so be Leon Allen if one defendant die and judgement  be against all it must be entire reverse roll Abr pl keb roll Abr pl vent cro  car salk reeve contra if the record have stop at the award of execution no  doubt but all will have be well enough and then when it go on with a to look  at closely be etian that be a distinct independent judgement and may be  reverse without affect the other if part of the word lie be not actionable and  several damage be give judgement shall be reverse in part only hob send vide  salk the case deny for strange law cro more cro Elizabeth I agree the case in  hob be deny in cro but the reason on which it be deny do not impeach the  authority of it as to my present purpose in this case where there be two  different judgement roll Abr pl   as to the case salk my report differ from it  for I take the damage to be several but he report they to be entire per curian  to look at closely be etian do not disjoin it at all if a man declare for two  ten pound it be the same thing whether the judgement be entire for l or  several for each Adjournatur and hill Geo without far argument it be reverse  as to cost and affirm pro residues on the authority of green v Waller hill W  rot and adjudge in b r Trin Ann on error out of Ireland it be reverse as to  cost and affirm as to the rest Henriques v Dutch WestIndia company post ken v  ken post Knox v Costelloo burr