Bulstrode Rawlins plaintiff against barret defendant enter mich James b r rot  Cr a writ of error upon judgement to make partition in a writ of error to  reverse a judgement give in a writ of partition it be show in the writ quod  accuse tenent the other plead quod non tenent hereupon they be at issue and  find by the jury quod accuse tenent and so judgement to make partition upon  this judgement a writ of error bring and before rror assign because it be not  show how they hold George croak this be no error be the course in the c b and  so be the book of entry without show comment and so be all the precedent in  point it be urge by Glanville for the plaintiff in the writ of error the case  be further that after this judgement give one of they die also the declaration  be contra form to cause to stand and there be two statute for partition h cap  h cap and it do not appear upon which of these statute he do declare George  croak the difference will be where it be feesimple land and where not but some  other particular estate be it in tail for life or for year where it be  feesimple there not to show comment they do hold otherwise it be in case of a  particular estate croak justice in the writ of partition there be two  judgement to be give the first be quod distribution fiat the second jud merit  be quod distribution fanctam sit of Firmum to make firm after the judgement  for the partition one of the party die and the other two bring a to know  facias as daughter and heir and do not show how where in the roll there be no  second judgement enter but only quod distribution fiat here the writ of error  be bring too soon before any partition have dodderidge justice in Berkeley and  the lady Warwick case the writ of error be bring after the first judgement in  partition and before the second and therefore rule to he have the same be  bring too soon for before the second judgement there be no perfect record here  to this purpose see e fol plea in a account man secondary inform the court  that this writ of error upon the first indictment and before the second come  too soon and so it have be diverse time here rule the whole court agree that  this writ of error be not well bring and so the same to be quash Bulstrode er  p