case William VAISEY vers hundred OF Whiston in come gloucest in c b in a  action upon the statute Edward for a robbery it ought to appear that the  plaintiff have the whole property in the money of which the robbery be commit  or otherwise if entire damage be give it will he have in toto Bac Abr sand keb  SC vin Abr title robbery S pl this be a action upon the statute Edward Edward  stat c a in which the plaintiff declare de plea quod quidam malefactor c in a  certain Johan goodman robertum capel servien Self quer insult fecer consisten  de to visit peciis ear coin money peremptory or urgent call guinea to visit  peciis ear coin money peremptory or urgent call half guinea de denar Self Gul  Vaisey not common with others in shades of dead guard pillage comens John  invent existen ac twenty peciis ear coin money peremptory or urgent call  guinea in shades of dead custodian pillage roberti invent existen de the same  John Roberto felon ceper asportaver abduxer c in domini king nunc contempt  grave damnum Self guglielmi contra form stat unde idem William who tam c quer  quare cum quidam malefactor c ut prius upon not guilty plead a verdict be find  for the plaintiff and damage be assess at and now sergeant cheshire move in  arrest of judgement for that the plaintiff have declare only for ut de denar  Self William not common with others but it do not appear by the declaration  that the guinea be the money of the plaintiff for though comens er p they be  in the possession of his servant which when the master be present be  sufficient to show that they be the master money for the possession of the  servant be the possession of the masterIt be determine in the case of comb v  Bradley hundred report in Mod comb holt Mod that if a man deliver money to a  servant to carry and he be rob of it the servant may maintain a action against  the hundred and declare that he be possess ut de good nest not common with  others yet the master be not divest of his property for he may bring a action  if he please infra p where the master be present yet it be not of consequence  that they be the money of the master who be absent and therefore entire damage  be give it will he have in toto afterward the chief justice say that all the  justice be agree that the plaintiff must have the property in the money of  which the robbery be commit and be and Tracy think that it do not appear here  that he have the property in the guinea but blencoe and dorm be of the  contrary opinion judgement be not arrest