case player against warn and due in the exchequer Chamber in trover against  two the jury may find the defendant several guilty as to part of the property  and not guilty as to the residue post roll ab roll ab Jones Carth bull n p cro  Elizabeth Bac ab espin dig dougl term Rep term Rep there shall be only one  judgement in pity although defendant be several find guilty post   a action of  trover and conversion of two thousand load of coal upon not guilty plead the  defendant be find guilty several for several load of coal and be find several  not guilty for the residue and judgement accord and entire cost and one  therefore in pity against the defendant and one therefore in pity against the  plaintiff pro falsely warcry and thereupon a writ of error be bring in the  exchequer Chamber and the error assign because the judgement be against both  the defendant for the several damage several for it be allege that several  damage ought not to have be assess but there be a joint trover and conversion  lie to their charge they ought to have be both find guilty and they ought not  to have be divide in the verdict and in the assess of damage and if they may  be sever vet the plaintiff ought to have but the damage give against one of  they as it be in sir John Heydons case   b Edward but all the justice and  baron agree that the plaintiff shall have several damage for be find several  guilty of several parcel convert he shall have judgement accord and it be not  like sir John Heydons case where there be but one croak car joint and sole  trespass of battery and so find and there although the damage be several  assess yet the plaintiff ought to take his judgement for damage but of one but  when the trespass be several and so find as in this case videlicet the one at  the one time and the other at another although it be contrary to the supposal  of the writ yet be find by verdict it shall not abate the writ and the  plaintiff shall recover accord to the verdict as it be say there in Heydons  case so here this be several find and the conversion by they several of  several thing the damage be well assess several and he shall have judgement  against they several for damage accord to the verdict and it be say that there  be diverse precedent in the king bench and common plea to that purpose the  second error assign be that there ought to have be several judgement de  therefore in pity against the defendant and be otherwise it be error But  against that it be also resolve that there shall be one judgement only of pity  a although the defendant be several find guilty and so be the precedent  whereupon the judgement be affirm vide Edward Henry assize