bacon versus Dubarry Trin will B R Intr Trin ld raym S c vide record page salk  submission by a as attorney for b concern account between b and c good to bind  a but not b comb S C skin case B R Carth holt debt on a bind defendant pray  oyer condition be whereas there be a controversy between the plaintiff and the  defendant as attorney to de rutter concern certain account between the  plaintiff and de rutter and the plaintiff and defendant have submit the say  controversy to the award of I S arbitrator if I e rutter stand to the say  award then the bind to be void c upon nul agard plead the award set forth be  that the defendant shall pay the plaintiff and that the plaintiff and  defendant shall mutual release to each other to this it be demurrer and it be  hold per cur saint that the submission be good though the defendant submit for  another for one man may undertake for another or be bind for another but such  submission be good only to bind himself and can bind the other because he be a  stranger to the agreement of submission dly that the award be not good because  though the defendant submit yet be submit as attorney ex part of one another  and the matter which the defendant submit be the business and controversy of  another know his principal that a release to the attorney be no discharge as  to the principal therefore this release will not discharge such demand as the  plaintiff have against de rutter so if de rutter be to pay the he be to have  nothing for his money it make the award of one side only and not mutual a  aliter have the release be award to the defendant for the use of de rutter or  de super prmissis and the award be not so the plead it to be make Salkeld de  super prmissis can mend or extend it and as to nichol case holt chief justice  say it only prove that money pay and accept Salkeld er p in pursuance of a  void award may be plead or take as a accord with satisfaction judgement pro  defendant Ro sty hob   cro b a vide kid to the principal requisite to form the  mutuality of a award be nothing more than that the thing award to be do shall  be a final discharge of all future claim by the party in who favour the award  be make against the other for the cause submit it be sufficient to award a sum  of money in consideration of a debt long due   that all suit or controversy  shall cease and one party shall pay the other a give sum strangford v green  Mod coal case roll ab king Harris v knipe lev or the payment of a sum and that  the party shall continue in friendship roll Arb king to pay for a trespass  Ormlade v cook cro James hob Freem to recite that there have be deal between  the party and that be due to the plaintiff and to award payment of that sum  Elliott v chevall Lutw to award that the defendant shall pay the plaintiff for  cost in a suit commence against they by the defendant without cause and that  all suit and difference shall cease Walmough v Holgate Ventr comb to recite  several grievance by the defendant to the plaintiff and award the payment of  money without express it to be in satisfaction for that must necessary be  intend Burbridge v Raymond roll Abr king it may now be safe lie down that it  be not necessary that the award itself shall express that a sum award to be  pay or a act to be do in favour of one of the party shall be in satisfaction  or that it shall contain any equivalent term a discharge to the other must  necessary be presume kid a award to pay and the cost in a suit to the  plaintiff without direct release or use word of satisfaction hold a good bar  to a action of trespass Tomlinson v Ariskin Com a award for the defendant to  pay a sum of money and take his mare c from the plaintiff within a week good  Cowp v Kust Lutw quere whether in the case of Bacon v Dubarry the release  award will not now be construe secundum to throw under means to mean a release  for the benefit of the party interest b vide will comens