case Rakestraw all versus brewer see rajah Kishendatt ram v rajah Mumtaz Ali  Khan l r ind App leigh v Burnett Ch d see also kinsman v rouse Ch d at the  roll Sel can in Charles mos Eq can ab pl pl a bill in equity will not lie to  redeem a mortgage of chamber in the inn of court but the plaintiff must apply  to the bench or to the judge of the society by if on application to the bench  they refer the plaintiff to his remedy in equity one possess of a renewable  term mortgage it to I S who gain a new term from the original landlord to  commence after the old one this new term shall be subject to the old equity of  redemption the plaintiff as representative of Henry Holford late of grey inn  Esq bring their bill against the defendant who be the executor of John brewer  Esq late one of peer William er p the bencher of that inn to redeem a mortgage  of chamber there make in and by assignment transfer to brewer the term  mortgage by Holford be for fiftyseven year be a building term which will  expire at ladyday and the bench give a new term for eleven year to Mr brewer  to commence from the end of the former and he be the first person who be in  possession of the chamber under the mortgage but have not be in possession for  twenty year so that the plaintiff come within time see note b to cook v arnham  post vol they first petition the bench to be admit to redeem and thereupon the  saint of may a order of pension be make recite that the matterin dispute  betwixt the party be matter of account which the bench be not capable of take  and the mortgage peer William of long stand but that the plaintiff be at  liberty to seek their remedy in a court of equity as they shall be advice upon  which the plaintiff bring their bill and it be insist by the defendant that  these chamber mortgage be in a inn of court where the student be to enjoy  quiet without disturbance the plaintiff ought to apply to the bench and if not  redress there then to the judge of the society but that the court at  Westminster have be always please to decline interpose therein the king v grey  inn Doug Cunningham v Wegg bro c c and the rather for that the legal estate of  all the chamber of the house be in trustee and the order of pension which  grant term in chamber pass no legal title nor be the bencher that make such  order seize of the legal estate and though a bill which be only to foreclose  the equity of redemption and suppose the plaintiff to have a legal title may  be proper yet in the present case it be otherwise since the plaintiff neither  have nor can have it especial as they be the daughter of Mr Holford the  mortgagor who be not capable of have the chamber master of the roll I will not  meddle with this title to chamber which be no legal one see franklin v fern  Barnard Troughton v Binkes Ves but the bencher themselves have recommend it to  the plaintiff to come hither and leave they at liberty to make this  application therefore the bill be proper it be then urge for the defendant  that if the plaintiff be proper to redeem the old building term of fiftyone  year which will expire at ladyday yet they can have no title to the additional  term of eleven year which be distinct from not interfere with the other term  but independent thereof and to commence from the expiration of the former peer  William grant by the bench in pure personal favour and kindness to Mr brewer  their brother bencher whereas have it be ask for by the plaintiff it probable  will have be deny and they be woman be not capable of have chamber by virtue  of a new grant though perhaps if a old term come from a member to executor who  be no member they may have a reasonable time to dispose thereof but no  instance can be give where one not a member have a chamber by a original grant  say per cur this additional term come from the old root and be of the same  nature subject to the same equity of redemption else hardship may be bring  upon mortgagors by the mortgagee get such additional term more easy as be  possess of one not expire and by that mean worm out and oppress a poor  mortgagor whereupon a decree for redemption be pronounce by the master of the  roll Reg lib b fol and that afterward Sab July affirm upon a appeal to the  Lord chancellor upon the same principle be the case of keech v Sandford Eq can  ab pi taster v Marriot Amb raw v Chichester Amb Owen v William Amb lee v Lord  Vernon bro p c and Edward bro p c Pickering v vowles bro c c see the note to  Addis v clement ante peer William er p