case PHYLER against boson Michaelmas term will mary roll direction of writ of  error to a inferior court SC ante now a new writ of error be bring direct  bailiff community our men exon et the dawn who because in record et in person  bailiff c and so right return the writ be to reverse a judgement in trover  after a verdict in the sheriff court in Exeter the first exception take by Mr  Carthew be that the plaint be enter December in cur dom king James d and so  all one as in cur pillage which be ill because of the abdication to which I  answer that by the Act of continuance of plea and the term c all bill plaint  judgement and proceed in court of city or town corporate or any other inferior  court and all other execution thereupon have since eleven of December and  before the thirteenth of February shall be good and effectual in the law as if  the say late king have remain in the exercise of his regal power so by that it  be well enough for the style of the court second that there be a  discontinuance because that the die datuss be ad prox cur tenant tali die and  do not say before who the court be to be hold and for it recite Rastals and  coke entry to which I answer it be true it must be say before who the court be  hold but it need not be in the die act of giving it be well enough if it be in  the ad how indeed predict cur and so it be here and so be the precedent in  those book the three that there be a discontinuance for want of a ei to go  away upon the imparlance pray from the that to that of February there be only  a petit licent interloquend and that ad how the party appear but no die act of  giving or to go away a ante page b it seem now to be settle that the word  value receive be not necessary for they only import that the bill be make upon  a valuable consideration which the law presume fort Mod post ld ray and the  case of white v Ledwick Bayley on bill App n c see stram b Rep term Rep and  kid on bill of exchange Reichard v Bollman term Rep Roger v Stephens term Rep  shower KB er p to which I answer that that be help by appearance afterward or  at least by the verdict by the case of swift v not side discontinuance of  process be help by appearance in Marsham v Anderson Keble want of die act of  giving be help by the verdict in Rawlins v Higgins keb hold error in judgement  for the defendant otherwise not in green v cube keb discontinuance shower KB  aid by verdict in inferior court and in mollineux case cro James but a express  authority be coal v green sand by the judge in the house of lord that the  statute of Jeofails do extend to inferior court that they be help by James c  and of this opinion be all the court and the judgement be affirm for that the  discontinuance of process be help at commonlaw by appearance and a  discontinuance of court be help after verdict by the statute of Jeofails and  so they hold in another case this term of Walwin v smith see Jesson v laxon  cro car roll Abr a