case the king against Edward and other a conspiracy by parish officer to marry  a female pauper settle in the parish of a to a pauper settle in the parish of  b in order to bring a charge upon the parish of b be a indictable offence but  the indictment must aver that the party be legal settle in their respective  parish for save they be inhabitant only be not sufficient S c Sess case S c  stram the defendant be indict for that they per concord in feeling inter eos  habitan give the husband money to marry a poor helpless woman who be a  inhabitant in the parish of b and incapable of marriage on purpose to gain a  settlement for her in the parish of a where the man be settle it be move to  quash this indictment because it be no crime to marry a woman and give her a  portion and the justice be not proper judge what woman be capable of a husband  neither have they any jurisdiction in conspiracy it be insist on the other  side that there be a crime set forth in this indictment which be a conspiracy  to charge a parish c and a conspiracy to do a lawful act if it be for a bad  end be a good foundation for a indictment a indictment for a conspiracy to  charge a man to be the father of a bastard child be hold good Temberley v  child side S c lev king v Armstrong vent a though fornication be a spiritual  offence because the court of king bench have cognizance of every unlawful act  by which damage may ensue so a information for a conspiracy to impoverish the  farmer of the excise be hold good king v starling side b modern report to  which it be answer that those be conspiracy to do unlawful act but it be a  good act to provide a husband for this woman the court the quash indictment be  a discretionary power of the court but in this case the defendant have not  show anything to induce the court to quash the indictment and if the matter be  doubtful the defendant must plead or demurrer but indictment for conspiracy be  never quash a bare conspiracy to do a lawful modern report er p act to a  unlawful end be a crime though no act be do in consequence thereof beg v best  ld Ra S c Mod a but if the fault in the indictment be plain and apparent it be  quash for that reason and the party shall not be put to the trouble to plead  or demurrer suppose there be a conspiracy to let land of ten pound a year  value to a poor man in order to get he a settlement or to make a certificate  man a parishofficer or a conspiracy to send a woman big of a bastard child  into another parish to be deliver there and so to charge that parish with the  child certain these be crime indictable it be also say that the court will  grant a information against overseer for this offence king v sadler sayer king  v Tarrant burr but the court have come to a resolution not to grant  information in these case easter term Geo and therefore it be refuse against  the overseer and inhabitant of Doncaster for conspire to prevail on a soldier  to marry a poor woman of their parish then big with child for the purpose of  throw the burden of maintain her on another parish king v Compton call it have  also be refuse in a very gross case that of a man under duress marry to a  idiot king v Upsdale mich Geo call notorious facts but if person concur in  such a conspiracy be of good circumstance and in responsible situation the  court will grant a information otherwise the injure party must resort to the  ordinary method of indictment call b but in this indictment it be not set  forth that the woman be likely to be Chargeable to the parish as to the  objection that the session have no jurisdiction in con piracy t he contrary be  true they have no jurisdiction in perjury at commonlaw but by the statute they  have and they have no jurisdiction to indict for forgery but certain they have  jurisdiction de conspirationibusRex v Rispal burr c and such a person as this  defendant be be punish by indictment at commonlaw it be say S c Sess case that  the court leave the defendant to demurrer or plead to it as they shall think  fit and S c I stram that on a demurrer to this indictment judgement be give  for the defendant because it be not a offence indictable d but in the Trinity  term follow judgement be give for the defendant because it be not aver in the  indictment that the woman be last legal settle in the parish of b but only  that she be a inhabitant there