case take versus hastings all eoden die Eq can ab pl pl S c one covenant to  settle land of such a value or a annuity out of land and he afterward purchase  land have no land before and devise it and die this land shall be liable to  the covenant vide speak v speak ante Vol Eq can ab pl roundel ux v breare post  and the principle seem to be recognize in the class of case on the head of  satisfaction wilcocks v wilcocks post Blandy v Widmore p wms goldsmid v  goldsmid swan note per cur if a man covenant or enter into bind to settle land  of such a value or a annuity out of land of such a value and have no land at  the time of the settlement but afterward purchase land that land shall be  liable and that against a voluntary devisee as the defendant Hastings in this  case be and accord decree that Backwell as well as Churchill shall be liable  to the plaintiff annuity notwithstanding that Backwell be devise to Hastings  the testator have enter into bind to charge land of the value of one hundred  pound per and with the payment of this annuity and not have any other land of  that value but withal declare that Hastings the devisee of Backwell shall be  reimburse out of Churchill that not be devise but leave to descend on the  daughter the point of the after purchase and the particular value of Backwell  as state in the print report do not appear the case that appear be that sir  John Churchill in consideration of pound agree that he will settle one annuity  of pound per annum on Margaret the wife of the plaintiff take for her life and  after her decease another annuity of pound to her old issue male and in  default thereof then to her old issue female during the life of such issue to  be pay at quarterly payment and to be issue out of land of pound per and and  that in march upon the receipt of the say pound he enter into a bind of pound  penalty conditioner for settle such annuity on or before the first day of June  then next by such conveyance as shall be tender to or require of he sir John  pay the annuity of pound during his life but never make the settlement of the  annuity pursuant to the say bind that in October he die seize in fee of the  manor and land of Churchill and of the manor of Backwell worth pound have by  his will give his say manor of Backwell to trustee to sell to pay the debt  thereon charge by any legal conveyance and the residue of the money to arise  by such sale to Charlotte the wife of the defendant Hastings and by the same  will he devise his say manor of Churchill to his daughter mary Scroggs the  wife of another of the defendant William Scroggs and the wood in Lincombe and  new park in Churchill to pay out of the profit his debt that his personal  estate will not pay and otherwise as therein mention and it further appear  that on the marriage of his say daughter mary with the say defendant Scroggs  the say sir John Churchill on the that Dec enter into article under hand and  seal and a bind for performance thereof to secure to the defendant Scroggs  pound on his say manor of Backwell but make his will and die as before mention  before the same be effectual perform as to all which the decree somewhat  confuse in the statement be in the first place as to the say annuity of pound  and pound that both the manor of Churchill and Backwell together with the  other land of sir John Churchill in Backwell be liable to the payment thereof  and of the arrear and interest thereof from the respective time the same  become Payable and in the second place as to the say sum of pound that the say  manor of Churchill and Backwell shall both be sell for payment of the say  pound and interest to the say defendant William Scroggs and the arrear of the  say annuity of pound and pound together with interest thereon as aforesaid and  that the say annuity for the future do stand charge upon the say manor of  Backwell and Churchill and that upon payment of the say sum of pound and of  the arrear of the say annuity of pound the say trustee name in the say will of  the say sir John Churchill be to convey the say manor of Backwell and the  other land of the say sir John Churchill in Backwell as the defendant Hastings  and his wife shall appoint subject nevertheless to the payment of the say  annuity and in case the say defendant Hastings shall at any time hereafter  settle and subject land to the annual value of pound beyond reprizes to the  payment of the say annuity the say manor of Backwell be to be discharge  thereof Reg lib b fol vide this case cite in deacon v smith atk  attorneygeneral v whorwood ves Vernon chancery case er p