case ashton against marriagesettlement portion for young child decree to be  raise by sale the question in this case arise upon the pen of a  marriagesettlement of sir Ralph Ashton and upon that clause of it which relate  to a provision for young child by that clause after the create of a term of  ninetynine year and vest it in trustee for that purpose it be provide that in  case he have both son and daughter the daughter shall have a thousand pound  each to be pay they at the age of twentyone or day of marriage which shall  first happen if there be no son and but one daughter then she be to have five  thousand pound but if there be more daughter then there be to be eight  thousand pound equal divide among they which sum be to be raise out of the  rend issue and profit of the estate as soon as they convenient can the father  die leave three daughter and no son the three daughter bring their bill to  have the eight thousand pound raise by way of mortgage or sale and for the  interest of the money from the time of their father death it be urge for the  plaintiff that there have be many case where a term be create for time raise  of portion for young child to be pay out of the rend issue and profit of the  estate and not say by sale or mortgage yet this court have decree a sale or  mortgage if that have appear to be the most convenient way for the raise of it  a Stanhope v Thacker Prec Chan Chan Rep a profit be a word of large extent a  grant of the profit of land be in law a grant of the land itself b ante b it  be observe that this practice of the court of chancery be very rational and in  support of the intention of the party because it be for the preferment of  daughter in marriage modern report the counsel of the other side acknowledge  that there be several case wherein this court have decree a sale or mortgage  though those word be omit but then they say that this distinction be to be  observe videlicet that the court of chancery have exercise this power where a  time be limit for the payment of the portion it appear altogether impossible  that they can be raise within the time so limit by the annual profit rend c  but that here no time at all be limit the counsel for the plaintiff reply that  here be a time limit for the payment of these portion videlicet upon the death  of the father without issue male for then say the deed the portion shall be  raise as soon as convenient they may which be in judgement of law present from  which time the portion be to carry interest Parker Lord chancellor be of this  opinion and decree it accord