case Merrell against smith the imparlance roll can be amend by the plea roll  ante post roll ab to Rep a declaration in ejectment be good although the day  on which the ouster be commit be not insert error of a judgement in the common  plea in a ejectment the error assign be because the first declaration be that  Thomas Eyre the that march James let to the plaintiff land in hox in the  county aforesaid for seven year by virtue whereof the plaintiff enter and be  possess until the defendant postea scilicet year say in addition to enter and  eject he so there be not any day mention after imparlance as the course of the  common plea be the plaintiff make a second declaration and there without any  space make the ejectment be suppose to be that maii and say in addition to and  the writ be bring of this ejectment mich James and thereupon the defendant  plead not guilty and find against he and judgement for the plaintiff the  question be whether this be erroneous by Geo c S where any tenant for life  shall happen to die before or on the day on which any rend be reserve or make  Payable upon any demise or lease of land tenement or hereditament which  determine on the death of such tenant for life the executor or administrator  of such tenant for life may ill a action on the law recover of and from the  lessee if such tenant for life die on the day on which the rend be make  Payable the whole or if before such day then a proportion of such rend accord  to the time such tenant for life live of the last year or quarter of a year or  other time in which the say rend be grow due croak James er p because no day  of ejectment be mention in the first declaration?But it be object and so a  agree by the court that the first declaration be the principal and material  declaration and the second be but a recital of the first and if any matter of  substance be omit in the first it can be aid or amend by the second for that  begin with a alias prout to stand open croak throw so it be but a mere recital  and therefore if the first be not good although the second be good and he  plead thereto and the trial be thereupon yet the judgement be erroneous but  all the court hold that as this case be the first declaration be well enough  for he declare of a lease the that march James which be the first day of that  year and the declaration quod postea scilicet James the defendant eject he be  certain enough for the year wherein he make the ejectment so as it appear that  it be after the lease make and in the same year of James wherein the ejectment  be and the action be bring year James and the ejectment be make between the  make of the lease and the action bring be good enough although there be not  any day certain allege and the certainty of the day be in the second  declaration and the verdict find he guilty of the ejectment the day of the  ejectment be not material it be before the action bring whereupon the  judgement be affirm