case parker against atfield if executor plead a judgement general he confess  asset for so much and can after say he have asset to a less value S c salk S c  ld ray debt upon a bind for twenty pound against a executor who plead that the  a see Tidds pract a but see and whether c S Tidds pract modern report er p  testator be indebt in one hundred pound to I S ultra quod he have not asset  replication that the judgement be keep up by fraud and the party to who the  judgement be Willing to take twelve shilling for it rejoin that it be not by  fraud and that he have not asset but to the value of five pound and a demurrer  because that when a executor plead a judgement general he thereby confess  asset for so much and afterward be can come and say he have asset but to a  less value holt chief justice the fair way for a executor be to plead the  judgement and show how much be due upon it and then to say that he have not  asset but to so much and that be the honest way of do it for if a judgement be  plead in its full extent of the penalty thereof and the plaintiff reply that  there be but so much due or that the party be Willing to take so much or that  it be keep up by fraud and issue be thereupon join if it be find by the jury  that the executor have not wherewithal to satisfy it be shall not be charge  for more because there be be not guilty of fraud if there be three judgement  of twenty pound each and the executor have asset only to the value of twenty  pound and he plead these three judgement which in all amount to sixty pound if  any one of they be ill plead or issue join and find that any of they be keep  up by fraud the executor have confess asset for that judgement that be  illpleaded keep up by fraud c but if the plaintiff desire to have judgement  when asset descend and so admit modern report your plea to be true then the  question be whether the executor have but twenty pound in hand and forty pound  come to he be just enough to satisfy the three judgement plead he shall not be  liable to the plaintiff execution who take judgement to execute when asset  come and he shall not for he have plead those judgement and the plaintiff  demand judgement to execute when asset come after the judgement plead be  satisfy wand he quote pasch car rot Walpole v prettiman upon a cognizant fa  upon such a judgement to have execution the defendant executor plead that he  have not asset over and above what will satisfy the former judgement plead and  hold a good plea but if he plead any of the judgement ill or that it be find  against he upon issue try that any of they be keep up by fraud he shall not  then have the allowance of be free of such a judgement till asset descend to  the value of the other judgement and more so that there be no mischief to the  executor let he but plead well and honest and to hold they to this be the way  to make executory honest and to reduce matter into certainty but if he have no  asset at all his best way have be to plead the judgement specialty in their  order but he must take care to plead they honest for if any one of they be  false he be go for all so that if there be a mistake in the plead or fraud it  be a devastation if issue be take upon the fraud and it be find but if you be  not find to have asset for the whole judgement it shall not be intend you have  more than you confess for the fraud be the only thing traversable and gold  justice quote the case of veal v Gileston a and workhouse v Simon b that issue  must be join upon the fraud for if you reply a composition make and that yet  the judgement be continue by fraud still it be the fraud that be traversable  and if one plead ten judgement and one of they be by fraud he have confess  asset at least to the full value of that judgement and he say it have be hold  in the common plea that a traverse in the composition have be well but a writ  of error bring and the judgement reverse here for the fraud only be  traversable judgement be give for the plaintiff