case the king against watson Qure whether a conviction of forcible detain a  chamber without describe its locality in the house be good upon a motion to  quash a conviction for a forcible detainer upon the view of the justice of the  peace the objection be that it be set forth that the defendant hold a chamber  in a house in such a street in the parish of saint Margaret Westminster by  force but do not allege who house it be or where it be situate nor whether the  chamber be forward or backward or how many pair of stair be up to it so that  if there shall be two chamber in this house the sheriff can not know of which  to deliver the possession modern report to which it be answer that the court  will not intend that there be two chamber on one floor it ought to appear that  there be two which it do not in this case and as to the house in which this  chamber be that be sufficient describe second which be the most material  objection the commitment of the defendant be to Newgate and it be not allege  that Newgate be the countygaol and if not then the justice have no power to  commit thither because the statute express require that the commitment shall  be to the countygaolThe statute Richard c which seem to be the statute upon  which this conviction be make inacts that upon complaint make to any justice  of peace of a forcible entry or detainer he may take sufficient power of the  county and go to the place where the force be make and if he find any that  hold such place forcible they shall be take and put into the next gaol there  to abide convict until they have make fine and ransom to the king a to which  it be answer that the court may judicial take notice that Newgate be the  countygaol and to prove this the yearbook Edward fol be cite but upon read the  record the word in the adjudication be all in the preterperfect tense when  they ought to be in the present tense and for that reason the conviction be  quash in the case of king v Morgan in Trinity term follow there be the like  judgement for the same fault note to former edition and in king v Robert a  conviction be quash for the same reason ld ray stram but where a conviction by  a justice be ground upon a information take at a time pass such conviction may  state that the informer come and give the justice to be inform in the  preterperfect tense king v hale term Rep b hilary term the nine of George the  first before the court of admiralty at the old Bailey