c bloys v bloys S c Ventr Ch Rep a devise to one that have a provision before  sir Thomas bloys have issue a son and two daughter by a first venture upon his  marriage with a second wife make a provision by settlement of for his daughter  by the second venture afterward have issue one daughter by his second wife by  his will devise all his estate real and personal to his three daughter provide  that if the son will pay pound to his sister that then that devise shall be  void and die first it be hold that the whole charge upon the estate of the  testator real and personal be but pound of which the pound settle upon the  daughter of the second venture be to be part but the question be whether she  shall have her share in the remainder of the pound beside the pound for if so  then the two daughter by the first venture will have have but pound apiece and  this daughter by the second venture will freeman have have pound if this  provision by the will shall be take to be additional to what be settle upon  the marriage and the Lord chancellor hold clear that it shall not without a  clear indication of such a intent the court will not decree a double provision  or double satisfaction Jesson v Jesson vern Thomas v Kemys ibidem bruen v  bruen ibidem bide v bide Eden there be no proof that it be the intent of the  father that it shall be additional and he cite the case of pile and pile Ch  Rep I Eq can ab Reg lib a fol the court declare there be no proof of any  intention of the father to make a double provision for his daughter by the  second venture and therefore that she ought to have but one pound but she  ought to have that in the first place whether the land liable by the will  shall or shall not be sufficient to raise the whole pound and decree accord  where sir Francis pile settle pound apiece by deed upon his three daughter and  after in his will give they pound apiece without take any notice of the  provision he have make by deed and there be no proof of his intent to make  this in his will additional to the other by deed it be hold it shall be intend  the same pound and so they have each of they but pound in the whole and if  that exposition be make there in case of the daughter and heir of the family  for the benefit of the collateral heir male then this be a much strong case  where it be betwixt the daughter of the second venture and the daughter of the  first freeman de term S hill in curian porter