adney against vernon judgement in a inferior court plead brief I sander lev  ante post levinz viner ab trespass for take the plaintiff good the defendant  justify for that time out of mind c till James there be a court in Worcester  hold in person bailiff and from thenceforward cordm mayor c and plead a plaint  levy there in debt and a count thereupon that the defendant be indebt to the  plaintiff infrajurisdid cur promise ft whereupon in such a manner process to  be that afterward videlicet october car consideratumfuil and c and so justify  by awarrailtu pori this judgement the plaintiff reply de in an unjust manner  svan not common with others without tali causan absq hoc quod ha elur some  tale record the defendant rejoin quod to have tale record and at the day bring  in the record whereby it appear the judgement be give the that of December car  and if he have fail of the record be the question for it be argue for the  defendant that see the record produce agree with the record plead in the entr  of the plaint and in all other thing except the day of the judgement give it  be no such variance as will make a plea faulty see it be a sufficient record  by virtue whereof and of the warrant thereupon the defendant take the good but  as to that the court give no judgement but they give judgement against the  defendant for other matter in the plea videlicet he plead the court to be hold  time out of mind c before James in person bailiff and from thence in person  majme c and do not show any grant c for the alteration thereof and then the  court hold before the mayor c be without any authority and the judgement void  it be not show in the plea that the cause of action arise within the  jurisdiction and then the judgement be in person non judge and void it be true  in the levinz declaration set forth ill the plea here it be say to be in a  jurisdiction Curi but that be not sufficient for that be traversable but the  matter in the declaration there be not traversable here but only that which be  allege in the plea here and upon those exceptiODS to the plea judgement be  give against the defendant though they agree the replication to be ill by  reason of the double traverse yet the declaration be good and the plea l  though the replication do not show that the plaintiff have no cause of action  he ought to have judgement