air vers Falkland S c salk a term for year may be devise to several successive  I for their respective life r send for side Brownl send for Fearne d Edward in  such case the reversion expectant upon those estate will belong to the  personal representative of the devisor S C cit Fearne d Edward ejectment upon  a special verdict the case be thus a possess of a term Lord Raymond er p for  ninetynine year devise it to b for life and after to six other successive for  their life if the say term shall so long continue all the seven person be dead  and the term continue the question be whether the residue shall go to the  executor of the testator or to the executor of the last devisee it be object  that as there can be a remainder of a term for the same reason there can be  any reversion leave in the first testator but that the entire term be in the  last devisee and consequent will descend to his executor say totan curian  contra for per Treby chief justice and Powell justice these executory devise  depart from the rule of the commonlaw and be allow in compassion to family for  who provision be now general make by term and lease therefore one must not  have too great retrospect to search for rule and construction in such case at  the beginning the devise be oppose for when a possess of a term for year  devise the term to b for life remainder to c the remainder to c be hold void  because the term be entire and comprise the whole interest as Lord Raymond  much as if he have devise a fee and so the term be entire in the first devisee  nothing be leave to remain to the second beside that a term for year be look  upon as a less interest than a estate for life afterward to surmount this  difficulty this expedient be find out in Matthew man case that there shall be  a transposition and that the latter devise shall be construe to pass first for  doubtless a man may devise a term to a after the death of b and upon such a  limitation the devisor be not exclude from the disposition of the mean  interest which he have not dispose of for the interval of the life of b and  therefore if a term for year be devise to a for life remainder to b by  construe this a devise to b after the death of a and that a shall have it in  the mean while it be allow good but if a devise a term for year to b in tail  remainder over this remainder be limit to commence upon a possibility too  remote and therefore the law will not wait for it the same law if a devise a  term to b and if he die without issue remainder to c this remainder be also  too remote but when the limitation be to a for life remainder to b a in  probability may die before the term determine and therefore all the remainder  in the present case at bar be hold good but forasmuch as the first and  afterward every one of the seven devisees in their respective turn have the  entire term during the life of the first devisee the whole term be in he and  the second have but a possibility et such de the for as there may be a  possibility of reverter at commonlaw so in these case there be a possibility  of remainder then as a possibility of remainder may be limit over in these  case so it may be reserve and if it be not dispose it shall be leave in the  devisor for that which a man have in he and do not dispose from he remain  still in he beside that a man may have a possibility of reverter where he can  limit a remainder as if a give land to b and his heir during the time that  such a oak shall grow he have a possibility of reverter though no remainder  can be limit from whence it follow that the residue of the term in this case  after the death of all the seven devisees must revert to the testator and his  executor and judgement be accord for the defendant c