case stone against newma ante page in plead a attainder of treason which be  confirm by special Act of parliament enact that the forfeit land shall be vest  in the crown without office find it be not necessary to allege a seize in the  king ante term Rep in plead a attainder of treason in a indictment take by  virtue of a special commission it be not necessary to state that the  commission be under the great seal this case be now move again upon exception  to the plead first because there be not any seize allege in the queen and then  sir Francis Wyatt title be good until seize for he croak car have the first  possession say non allocatur for it appear that after the attainder the queen  be entitle by the general Act of parliament of Henry c and by the special Act  of I and Philip mary c of the attainder of sir Thomas Wyatt it be in the queen  without office and that the queen grant it by patent to he under who the  plaintiff claim who enter and be seize until sir Francis Wyatt enter and  distrain for damage pheasant so he have the priority of possession and right  as it be now hold by the great opinion wherefore this exception be disallow  the second exception be that the indictment be by virtue of a commission grant  to diverse person and he do not say sub great seal England and that the  attainder be upon the trial before the commissioner and he do not say sub  great seal so that if it be not sub great seal it be not good and in proof  thereof the plead in the common plea in Moultons case a be remember that the  commission be sub great seal and in Huntley case b in this court because the  deprivation be find before the commissioner ecclesiastical army commission to  they direct and he do not say sub great seal it be hold to be ill and in page  case c letter patent be plead sub great seal and although it be true that in  walsingham case d it be plead as here and do not say sub great seal and yet  judgement give yet it be say that be because no exception be take thereto and  in   Ent the commission be plead by letter patent sub great seal and a  attainder by virtue thereof and in the case of sir moil finch e it be so  likewise plead so general the plead be sub great seal otherwise it be ill and  as no attainder plead Jones justice at the first be of that opinion but  afterward upon search of precedent whereby it appear that sometime sub great  seal be omit and when it be show quod per litter patenes commission omit sub  great seal it be to be intend under the great seal and not otherwise all the  court agree that although it be the better course to show that it be sub great  seal yet be omit it be well enough and good both way a cro Eli Leon Leon b  palm Brownl c   a d Plowd e   Ent croak car er p and they agree that here  accord to the great opinion in the exchequer Chamber judgement shall be enter  for the plaintiff