case Jackson versus Rawlins die Nov Eq can ab pl S c a man marry a  administratrix plaintiff obtain a decree against he and his wife for pound she  die whether the plaintiff can proceed against the husband without revive  against the administrator of the wife a man have marry a administratrix the  plaintiff obtain a decree against the husband find wife for one thousand five  hundred pound out of the estate of the intestate then the wife die the  question be whether he can proceed against the husband without revive and  bring a administrator of the wife before the court it be insist that although  the decree be to pay only out of asset and though the waste may be before the  coverture yet now the husband and wife be bind to answer it as far as any  asset come to the wife hand and be once charge the death of the wife shall not  discharge he this come on upon exception to the master report for that such  report ought not to have be make until the cause which it be submit have abate  by the death of the wife have be revive and the administrator of the wife make  a party and the order declare that by the death of the say Elizabeth Rawlins  the late wife of the defendant the suit be abate and that the administrator  ought to be make a party before any further proceed can he have in the cause  and do therefore order that the say exception be allow Reg lib a fol bachelor  v bean ante Sanderson v crouch ante and case cite in note there obrian v ram  Mod woodier v Gresham salk in the last two case judgement be recover in the  first against and in the second by a feme sole and after marriage husband and  wife in both case sue out and have sue out against they cognizant fa and  judgement quod to have performance c against husband and wife de financial  loss c and after this award and before execution execute the wife die and  after her death a new cognizant fa against the husband and he be hold  Chargeable which per holt c I prove that the award or judgement quod flat  execution on the to know facias make a plain alteration for the husband  survive h a not be liable on the first judgement only yet semble the husband  be not bind to answer it far Vernon chancery case than the value of the estate  which he have with his wife and the rule in equity be where two or more be  liable to a demand you shall not proceed against one alone but must bring all  the person liable before the court vide Barker v wile all ante Vol and case in  note and where a bill file against the executor of one of several obligors all  the survive obligors must be party that the charge may be equal Blois v Blois  vent so Madox v Jackson atk contra where the obligors be only surety ibidem  and so say to be clear where judgement obtain against one of several obligors  because the bind be drown in the judgement