case HUMERSTON versus HUMERSTON refer to Vanderplank v king hare Lyddon v  ellison Beav follow Parfitt v Hember l r Eq refer to Juttendromohun Tagore v  Ganendromohun Tagore l r ind App sup vol Hampton v Holman Ch d vern S c Eq Abr  pl burrow wms S c vezey pale yellow Eq Rep S c fearne count Rem S c a devise  land to the draper company in trust to convey to b for life remainder to his  first c son for their life successive and so to their issue male for their  life only c though this be a vain attempt of a perpetuity yet the trustee  shall make as strict a settlement as may be make all the person in be but  tenant for life but the limitation to the son unborn must be in tail there be  several question in this case which arise upon the will of one Matthew  Humerston one whereof be concern his intention to perpetuate his name for  which purpose he have give a very considerable estate to the draper company  and their successor for ever upon trust to settle the same on such a one of  the name of Humerston for his life and after his death to his first son for  life only and so to the second and all other his son for life only and for  want of such issue then to another precedent in chancery er p of the name of  Humerston for his life and so to his first and other son for life only and for  want of such issue then to another of the name of Humerston and so reckon up  about of that name to who he give only estate for life with like remainder for  life to the first and other son of each of they respective as they shall  become entitle thereto and if there be none of that name to be find in England  then the trustee and other be to choose out the most comely young man they can  find in such a parish and he to take upon he the name of Humerston and then  the estate to be settle on he for life with several limitation over in the  like manner without limit a estate in tail or in fee to they or make a  disposition of the fee but both court and counsel hold this to be such a  affectation of a perpetuity that nothing be say in support of it only the  limitation for life to the several person in be be hold good and a settlement  decree to be make accord videlicet to the first Humerston precedent in  chancery name in the will for life remainder to trustee during his life to  support contingent remainder with remainder to his first son a nd the heir  male of his body and so to the second son in like manner and for want of such  issue to the other in remainder successive in like manner and it be hold clear  that the word and for want of such issue with wms and in the will will not  raise a estate tail by implication to the first Humerston who be to take  against such express limitation to he for life only I Leon man and Andrews be  cite