Bradle and STRATCHY march a bill may be bring by a patron against the parson  in order to restrain he from commit waste upon the glebe how far a patron may  have a prohibition to restrain the parson from commit waste upon the glebe the  plaintiff be patron of a church and the defendant be parson of it the  defendant have commit waste upon the glebe thereupon the present bill be bring  by the plaintiff against the defendant in order to have a injunction to  restrain the defendant from commit any far waste upon it and a affidavit be  make set forth that he have commit this waste last night a application be make  in order to have a injunction Lord chancellor at that time think that this be  not such a case wherein the court can interpose by grant a injunction and  incline to think likewise that the affidavit be hardly sufficient his lordship  say now that he have consider of this case again and he be full satisfy that  the injunction ought to be grant he say that when this matter come before the  court he think at that time that a bill can not be bring by the patron against  the parson in a case of this nature and that the proper remedy be for a bill  to be bring in the name of the attorneygeneral at the relation either of the  patron or of some other person but now he be convince that a bill of this kind  may well be bring by the patron it appear by Richard Lifords case in Rep  Barnardiston that the patron may have a prohibition in the court of commonlaw  in a case of this nature so if a prebendary commit waste in his prebend it  appear in the same case that the patron may have a prohibition in the same  case it S take notice of that the bishop of Durham commit waste in his  bishopric upon which occasion redress be apply for to the parliament hold at  Carlisle the answer that the parliament make be let he be forbid by Writ out  of the chancery that neither he nor his servant commit waste in the premise  his lordship say that that resolution of the parliament be agreeable to the  reason of the case beforementioned namely that as in the former case where  private person be patron the remedy for they be by prohibition so in case of  bishopric where the king be patron there ought to be the like remedy by obtain  a prohibition out of chancery in roll Abridg there be three or four instance  wherein prohibition have be grant in the case of waste commit by  ecclesiastical person a prohibition be the ordinary remedy for waste at the  commonlaw and on that ground it be that injunction of that kind be grant in  this court for these reason his lordship say that with regard to the nature of  the case it be extreme certain that the patron may have a injunction the only  remain doubt relate to the affidavit and his lordship opinion be that that be  certain enough by reason of the reference that it have to the bill and so his  lordship be please to order accord