coke b the countess OF north UMBERLANDS case mich Elizabeth in the common plea  a release in quare hinder from one coheir plaintiff do not bar the rest in all  case of thing entire and in the realty the release of one shall enure to the  benefit of the other a presentation by the grantee of the next avoidance be a  sufficient title for the heir of the grantor the coheir need not allege any  presentment by their ancestor the same law of lessee for year for life tenant  in dower by the courtesy c c presentment allege in lessor or donor and also in  lessee or donee be not double the presentment of the lessor or donor only be  traversable SC cro Elizabeth more and Fitton and the countess of  Northumberland his wife sir Thomas Cecil knight and Dorothy his wife William  Cornwallis esquire and Lucy his wife and the lady davers daughter and heir of  the Lord Latimer bring a quare hinder against hall and other who plead a  release of William Conwallis pen the writ judgement of the writ and thereupon  the plaintiff demurrer and it be adjudge that it go in bar a   light b Doct pl  roll   a a only against William Cornwallis and his wife and the writ stand for  the other a in a quare hinder bring against a and b tenant in common of a  advowson be assignee of coparceners who do not agree to present a suffer  judgement by default and b die pen the writ this judgement be a bar to another  quare hinder bring by a and c the representative of b in which a be summon and  sever to recover the same presentation but be not a bar to c s right to  recover on the next avoidance in his turn Barker v bishop of London h black a  vide e a in the case of b Fitzherbert guard Br guard Br summons severance    light a e e b pl b ware et notam that in all case of a thing entire and in the  realty as presentation to a church ware ship of the body c the release of one  shall enure to the benefit of the other then it be move that the declaration  be insufficient for the plaintiff in their declaration entitle themselves that  the say Lord Latimer be seize of the advowson in fee and grant the next  avoidance to dean Carew and afterward the church be void dean Carew present  and so convey the descent to they without allege any presentment b in a quare  hinder the crown as well as the subject must allege a presentation a commendam  to hold back do not amount to one but when the verdict find that the crown be  seize ut de to make one young fig it cure the want of the allegation king v  bishop of Llandaff strange and Vid Com dig pleader I b in the Lord Latimer or  any other but only in the grantee of the next avoidance and whether this  presentment be good title for the grantor and his heir or not be the question  and it be adjudge that it be a c before b roll cro b e b before b b   b c  sufficient title for he do it in the right and coke a title of the grantor and  therefore it shall serve for he coke report b er p to make a title in a quare  hinder the same law of lessee for year lessee for life tenant in dower tenant  by the courtesy guardian tenant by statutemerchant staple c and this a free  with that diverse opinion in e e b h a h r quare hinder Elizabeth dyer and  true it be that it be a common learning in our book that where tenant for year  or for life bring a quare hinder he ought to allege seize in he who have fee  hoc regulantur yes be and yet presentation by themselves suffice as appear h  and this resolution do not oppose that rule for the presentation of the  grantee of the next avoidance be make in the title and right of the grantor  shall serve as well for he as his own presentment and be tantamount as if  grantee for year of a signiory or guardian get seize of the service it shall  be a good seize for he in reversion and therewith agree f n b f e e assize e  roll Rep Bulstr Cr Elizabeth Doct pl also it be hold in our book that if  presentment be allege in the lessor or donor and also in the lessee and donee  it be not double for the presentiment of the lessor or donor be only  traversable and see for both these point e e e e h e h Phil man dyer note a  case adjudge in which be diversity of opinion in our book in which the law be  now well resolve