case DEMAINBRAY versus Metcalfe all Lord chancellor Nov ante case pre Ch pale  yellow Eq Rep Eq can ab pl S c plaintiff pawn some jewel to knight who sign a  write that they be to be redeem in twelve month otherwise for the pound they  be to be as buy and Vernon chancery case er p sell knight within a short time  after deliver over the jewel together with some plate of his own to Metcalfe  as a pledge for pound and knight afterward borrow pound and pound of Metcalfe  on promissory note to be repay on demand and Metcalfe by answer insist it be  agree verbal r l that the pledge shall be a security as well for the money  upon the note as for the money first lend but can make no proof of any such  promise or agreement Lord chancellor although Metcalfe a bookseller and do not  deal in plate or jewel and so have not gain any property as have buy in a  marketovert yet it be natural to think although he take note for the pound and  pound that the pawn be not to be part with until that money as well as what be  before lend be pay and say he look upon it be a personal pawn r l as a Vernon  chancery case account current between knight and Metcalfe and therefore he may  retain what he have in his hand until balance pay three class of case seem to  come as to tack and stoppage within the principle of the above case saint  mortgage and mutual credit d personal pawn or pledge with respect to the first  class vide Baxter v man ante vol p Shuttleworth v Laycock ibidem and the case  cite in not there respective as to the second class vide Curson v African  company ibidem p and case cite in not there and as to the three class the only  general rule that appear from the case be that the court be favourable to  liens but how far it will determine that a subject which be pledge as a  security for a debt shall be consider as security for further loan must from  the nature of the thing and in fact do depend in each particular case on the  circumstance the case that contain the material disquisition on the subject be  green v farmer burr Bl Rep SC Jones v smith Ves jun in which the other case  that have occur on the point be respective refer to and therefore decree a  redemption to the plaintiff of his jewel upon payment of all that be due to  Metcalfe as well upon the note as on the pawn Viz principal interest and cost  and in default of payment thereof the bill to be dismiss with cost Reg lib a  fol note knight be a bankrupt and the bill as against his assignee dismiss  with S cost but the good of knight which be pawn be to be first apply as far  as the value thereof shall extend