Bunbury the attorneygeneral at the relation OF saint JOHN`S college in  cambridge v the town OF shrewsbury touch the name a master to the school at  Shrewsbury of royal foundation king Edward the six by letter patent erect a  freeschool in Shrewsbury and give the bailiff and burgess power nominand  appunctuandi a schoolmaster and of make law concernen tangent row steering  sending pedagogy with the advice of the bishop of Litchfield and Coventry and  also for the preservation of the revenue c queen Elizabeth year royal power  increase the revenue of the school in consideration whereof the bailiff and  burgess agree to such ordinance as Mr Ashton then the head master shall with  the advice of the bishop make who do accord make several relate to the  disposition of the revenue and qualification of the master year Elizabeth the  bailiff and burgess make bylaws the seven and eight of which be that upon  every vacancy of a master the college shall elect and nominate a proper person  qualify as by ashton ordinance to the bailiff who shall dominate such person  but by the eight bylaw have power to approve or disapprove and by indenture  Elizabeth between the bailiff and burgess and the bishop of Litchfield and the  college they covenant to perform the say bylaws and enter into bind of one  thousand pound for that purpose and this method of election have be observe  for one hundred and fiftytwo year without any interruption till late Bunbury  and now upon a information by the attorney general at the relation of the  college of saint John to compel the town to nominate accord to the bylaws and  usage it be first object by the court that by the letter patent of Edward the  six he be the founder be consequent visitor and the decree now pray be  interfere with the visitatorial power and the crown can visit only under the  great seal but upon the second hear the court think there be do weight in this  but that the court may proceed to establish this as a charity dly it be object  that the power of nominate by the letter patent of Edward the six be vest in  the body as a trust or naked authority and therefore can not be delegate to  which it be answer that this be not a total delegation of the authority but  only a regulation to prevent confusion as in the case of corporation lib to  which it be say that the same objection may be make as to this and the usage  of two hundred and fiftytwo year do much corroborate this case and of that  opinion be the whole court and decree for the plaintiff Bunbury de term S the  number three