case primrose v Bromley executor of mead December the that SC Ves cite where a  assignee die before he have account for what he have receive and leaves no  personal asset the creditor have a lie upon his real estate there be a decree  in another cause that all creditor as well those who be party to the bill as  otherwise shall come before the master to prove their debt against the estate  of mead among the rest there appear before the master more the survive atkins  er p assignee of one Barker a bankrupt and claim as a debt such money as mead  have receive as joint assignee with more under the commission against Barker  in the deed of assignment more mead and another assignee of Barker covenant  for themselves their heir executor and administrator to account for such money  as they or either of they shall receive to the commissioner mead before his  death get in very large sum of money from the bankrupt estate and be dead  insolvent the question before the master be whether the commissioner under  this assignment be to be consider as simple contract creditor only and it come  now before the court upon exception to this part of his report Lord chancellor  I be of opinion that the commissioner ought to be consider as special creditor  because the assignee execute a counterpart of the assignment to they and the  agreement be under band and seal make it in the nature of a speciality debt  and as they be consider in this light though mead be dead without any personal  asset vet they may come upon his real estate the word of the assignment to  account for such money as they or either of they shall receive must be so  construe as that the assignee atkins may be joint and several bind so that  they be to be consider in this court as mere trustee and each separate  answerable only for what they receive and it will be of dangerous consequence  to hold they otherwise there be a case which I determine in this court where  there be two person joint bind in a bind one of the obligors die and to be  sure at law it may have be put in suit against the survivor b it as I think it  extreme hard I decree the representative of the co obligor shall be charge  acquire step with the survive obligor in the payment of the bind Simpson v  Vaughan post vol bishop v church Ves in the latter case this point be full  discuss though the form in the assignment under this commission of bankrupt be  the common and usual one yet I think it verb proper that the word joint and  several shall be insert for the future for the safety and security of each  respective assignee