case the king against broom by admiralty law property of a ship take from a  enemy without letter of mark vest in the king S c Carth S c Mod S c salk S c  comb broom by authority under the African company who by the king letter  patent have order to take the ship of enemy and dispose they as they please  take a French ship on the high sea and carry it into a river beyond sea and  sell it there this ship upon a general monition contra all men gentes fix upon  the exchange be condemned in the admiralty for prize and the grantee of the  perquisite of the admiralty libel in the name of the king advocate against  broom recite the take and the condemnation and that it be a perquisite of the  admiralty at d allege that broom have not deliver the ship on request but have  convert it c and sentence be give against broom in the admiralty from which he  appeal to the delegate and now pray a prohibition suggest that the matter  arise infra corpus Com and this be a plain action of trover but against the  prohibition it be object that it be after sentence and to stop his own appeal  and for this cite cro latch winch bro   roll Abr but per curian if a  prohibition be not grantable after sentence they sit all the vacation may  hasten the sentence and conclude the party before the term and it be proper  for the party to appeal to suspend the sentence until he may be relieve by  prohibition and where in the libel or proceed it appear that the cause of suit  arise on the land they may be modern report prohibit at any time second it be  object against the prohibition that this river do not appear to be part of the  continent or of the main sea and the suggestion that this be infra corpus Com  be not proper because beyond sea there be no such division by county but this  be not regard by the court that where the original cause arise on the high sea  the admiralty shall hold plea of the entire suit though other matter  subsequent arise on the land cro sand side and it be resolve by the whole  court that though if good be take from a enemy it vest the property in the  party take they by our law yet by the admiralty law the property of a ship  take without letter of mark vest in the king upon the take and this on the  high sea therefore that which be take be but in trust for the king and he who  take it be but Accountable to he and for the account and breach of this trust  the suit be in the admiralty very proper now if the party who take this ship  bring it to land and there sell ft and convert it to his own use this make he  a wrongdoer ab beginning a and the conversion on the land be but one continue  act with the capture and be evidence to explain his intent in the capture to  show his breach of trust on the sea and as case very strong in this case be  cite side sand palm roll Rep and the rule for prohibition be discharge b a the  six carpenter case   b as to the exclusive jurisdiction of the court of  admiralty upon the question of prize see Le Caux v Eden dougl Lord Camden v  home term Rep see also strange term Rep modern report er p modern report  michaelmas term the nine of William the three in the king bench sir John holt  Knt chief justice sir Thomas Rokeby Knt sir John Turton Knt sir Samuel Eyre  Knt justice sir Thomas Trevor Knt attorneygeneral John hawles Esq solicitor  general