case cotton against Hawkins a judgement give in a inferior court without say  per cur or use any word to such effect be erroneous Writ of error to reverse a  judgement give in the court of Burton upon Trent in Staffordshire in a action  of the case for word bring by Hawkins speak of he in respect to his profession  as a attorney I the a James roll king skin saint Tr at Salop car g in SC Mod  it be say that the judgement be arrest a see the case of trover v wall that a  declaration in a inferior court must state not only that the defendant promise  to pay but that the money be have and receive within the jurisdiction of the  court term Rep see also the case of Roland v veil Cowper shower KB er p I be  of counsel with the plaintiff in the writ of error assign this error videlicet  that it be not say in the judgement per cur nor be there any word use to  supply it neither per seneschallum nor so much as ad the same curian so that  for ought appear it may be a award for recovery by the jury inferior court  ought to keep to the strict form of judgement therefore concession instead of  onsideratum be error in a judgement in any borough or other inferior court as  in the case of horn v warden a in full v righton b in robin v Sambeth c and in  slocomb case d and several other case be there of judgement in such court  reverse here for not observe the due form of entry as to retake instead of  recupere e it shower KB be true in superior court concession or adjudicatem be  may suffice because the practice and course of the court at Westminster be the  law of these court and in coke report in the plead there you may find several  judgement with therefore concession be by the court here above nay this very  omission of per curian be no error in a superior court as the common plea  where they never say any more than therefore to look at closely be and it  shall be intend to be by the court but otherwise in case of inferior  jurisdiction as in the case of smith v smith f it be hold express to be error  in a inferior court and in siderfin g there be this note when it be in a  inferior court it ought to be to look at closely be per curian otherwise it be  erroneous see mead v Axe h writ of error bring on a judgement in case for word  as this be and reverse for this error because the judgement be to look at  closely be and the word per cur omit march Rep case again in the same book I  be a anonymous case of a writ of error to reverse a judgement in debt upon a  arbitrement and the error assign be in the entry of the judgement it be to  look at closely be and per cur leave out in this court it have be allow error  in the award of a venire facias to omit per curian it be so rule in the Lord  Rainsfords time much more be it necessary in the judgement which be proper  right of way for cattle curiae in the case of stub v Manley king debt on a  obligation in the court at Owsebridge in the county of York writ of error  bring here and the common error assign and roll chief justice upon oyer of the  record take this exception that it be therefore teaching be viscount and do  not say per cur and the judgement be reverse and in roll Abr be several of  this nature and upon this exception we have a rule for judgement of reversal  unless better cause be show before the end of the term shower KB but afterward  the last day of the term they come and move to quash our writ of error for  that the record be not remove the record be and the court hold in person W S  seneschallo and our writ of error be direct to the steward and bailiff and  recite in person we so that it be not the same judgement if the court have be  before they both though one return it yet it will be well enough but be before  one only it be nought and the writ of error be quash