case the queen against Swanson Bainton Hartley and spurr the subsequent  consent of a woman forcible marry will not extinguish the offence SC holt SC  saint Tr the defendant be all indict upon the statute of Henry c against steal  of woman c modern er p the indictment set forth the woman age that she be a  heiress to I S be worth in good and chattel so much and so much inland of  inheritance and that she be a virgin upon evidence the case appear to be thus  Bainton personate a country lady though in truth a woman of the town take a  lodging in the house where mrs plaisant Rawlins modern lodge for that be her  name and after some time introduce the say Swanson into the house as her  brother where he frequent have the conversation of the say Rawlins in the mean  time mrs Bainton use to magnify her pretend brother merit and goodness  insomuch that the say Rawlins have likewise declare her like of he and wish he  will marry her but to get her abroad without any of her friend Bainton delude  her aunt and her to go with her to church and against the time get bailiff to  take out a writ for Rawlins and her aunt and so they waylay and arrest they  and convey they from Westminster where they live first to the garter tavern in  Drury lane and there separate the aunt and her and carry her to Holborn to the  vine tavern where Swanson come as her bail and there marry her continue under  the arrest Bainton tell her that if she do not marry he she must go to Newgate  Swanson and Bainton be find guilty for the court deliver it to the jury for  law that though the say Rawlins have a fancy for the man yet because she be  not privy to the contrivance of come out to he and know not beforehand or  consent so to come to he and be marry while she continue under that restraint  and violence though perhaps she consent to the marriage yet the say fact be a  crime within the statute for here be a forcible take away and her subsequent  consent while under the restraint can not be look upon but a effect of the  continue force and that though Swanson have know nothing of the first force  yet he know her to be under it and marry while he know her to be under it make  he approve of the first force and so partake of it so as to be guilty note  upon this statute all aider and assister be principal and note the man be bang  hearty and spurr the bailiff be acquit michaelmas term the first of queen  whether in the queen bench sir John holt Knt chief justice sir Littleton powys  Knt sir Henry gold Knt sir John Powell Knt justice Edward Northey Esq  attorneygeneral Simon Harcourt Esq solicitor general