case Skipwith against green if a lease be make of meadow pasture and arable  land in which two parcel be describe as lane meadow and a action be bring  against the lessee for plough up lane meadow contrary to covenant the  defendant may show that the land thus describe be arable and not meadow land  for the word in the lease be descriptive of the locality and not of the  quality of the land S c stram S c Mod S c Danv action on a covenant in a lease  for year wherein be several parcel of land demise and among other one parcel  call lane meadow and one entire rend reserve and over and above the rend  reserve five pound a acre per annum for every acre of meadow or pasture that  the say green shall blow up and the defendant covenant to pay both the say  rend as reserve it be aver that he blow one hundred and twelve acre of meadow  call lane meadow for which so much rend be in arrear and do not pay it plea as  to thirty acre parcel of the hundred and twelve non to plough as to eightytwo  the residue that at the time of the lease and for sixty year before they be  and have be arable per quid he blow they as it be lawful without hoc that they  be meadow demurrer and joinder reeves these land be demise to the defendant as  meadow by the name of lane meadow he be therefore estopped to say they be not  meadow and this estopped appear on the record we need not show it by  replication but may demurrer Kemp v Goodale easter term Ann Hawkins sergeant  contra the estopped be the word of the lessor and we accept the land by the  name he give they it be unlike where the covenant or estopped come from the  party himself this be not contradict the deed or destroy the effect of it it  be only say that the land which come to we by the name of meadow in reality be  not so estoppels be odious in the law and therefore when we covenant not to  blow any meadow or pasture it must be take to mean a actual meadow reeves in  reply the indenture be all the word of both party on a deed poll one may plead  nil to have in property it be the word of one only Pratt chief justice the  rule in law that a deed shall be construe accord to the intent of the party be  never to be break through which be not here that lane meadow be meadow but  only that it be a description of land which have be ancient know by that name  and have keep the same description though they have be blow for many year they  be not estopped to say anything which be not contrary to the intent of the  party if it be a estopped it be the same who word soever they be for they be  all the word of each party modern report powys justice of the same opinion  fortescue justice by accept the lease and execute the counterpart the lessee  assent to every material part the instance of nil to have in property be deny  the lease and strong than this which be only deny that which be in the lease  call meadow to be so which may well be try Raymond justice a estopped be what  the court shall never come into but of necessity there have be no case to show  that the party can not have have that parcel of ground if it have not be  meadow suppose it have be lane meadow contain one hundred acre will he have be  estopped to say they be but fifty fazakerly acquaint the court that he be  retain to speak to it but the court give judgement for the defendant unless  cause this term be very clear modern report er p