case ewer versus Corbet at the roll Eq can ab pl one possess of a term devise  it to a and make b his executor and leaves some debt if the executor sell the  term the purchaser shall hold it against the devisee by if sell at a under  value or if the purchaser know there be no debt or that the debt be or can be  pay without break in upon this specific legacy one possess of a term for year  devise it to a and die indebt have make b his executor the executor sell the  term upon which the devisee of the term bring a bill against the purchaser  insist that the term be devise to the plaintiff the executor be but a trustee  for he and that the purchaser must have notice of this trust the term have be  buy of the executor and consequent must be take subject to the trust master of  the roll I remember it to have be once rule that a executor can not make a  good title to a term to a purchaser and that be in the case of major bill  versus humble but since that I take it to have be resolve and with peer  William great reason that a executor where there be debt may sell a term and  the devisee of the term have no other remedy but against the executor to  recover the value thereof if there be sufficient asset for the payment of debt  as for the notice of the will and of the devise of the term to a three person  that be nothing for every person buy of a executor where he be name executor  must of necessity have notice so that if notice be to be a hindrance then of  consequence no executor may sell it be not reasonable to put every purchaser  of a lease from a executor to take a account of the testator debt nor have he  any mean to discover they on the contrary as the whole personal estate of the  testator be liable for the debt this lease must inter alian of necessity be  liable and therefore may be sell kV the executor if equity be otherwise it  will be a great hindrance to the payment of debt peer William er p and legacy  and will lie a embargo upon all personal estate in the hand of executor and  administrator which will be attend with great inconvenience I admit if a  executor shall sell a term for a under value or to one who have notice that  there be no debt or that all the debt be pay this may be another consideration  but there be no such ingredient in the present case dismiss the bill see the  follow case vern where it appear that the mortgage make of a term by a  executor be by this court hold to be good and that a residuary or specific  legatee have only their remedy against the executor but that decree be on  appeal reverse by the house of lord bro p c and Edward bro p c so nugent v  Giffard I atk Elliot v Merriman Barnard and atk S c so although the term be  sell in satisfaction of the private debt of the executor nugent v Giffard I  atk Meadv Lord orrery atk Ithell bean I ves unless the purchaser appear to  collude with the executor as in crane v drake vern this point also come in  question in Scott v tiler bro c c S c dick see also Bonney v Ridgard Cox  Andrew v Wrigley bro c c Dickenson v Lockyer Ves Bedford v Woodham ib n hill v  Simpson Ves tailor v Hawkins Ves MLeod v Drummond Ves Ves Drohan v Drohan I ba  be bay v ray coop keane v Robarts mad the same principle apply to sale c by  trustee of real estate Watkins v cheek S S