burrow Cockerill assignee versus owston Monday that November bankrupt liable  to judgement on a bailbond see bosan Str the question be whether a bankrupt  certificate obtain after judgement in a action upon a bailbond against the  bankrupt himself for the bail be not at all concern in this motion shall  discharge the bankrupt from this judgement upon the bailbond as well as from  the original debt which the plaintiff so counsel agree that it do discharge he  from NoteThe defendant have pay the money into the sheriff hand upon be take  up by a can sa in order to procure his liberty so that the motion be that the  money may be restore to the defendant with cost and the court have grant a  rule to show cause upon Mr Luke Robinson be motion against which rule Mr  Clayton now show cause the court hold that the certificate obtain subsequent  to the bring of this action upon the bailbond though such certificate be find  upon a act of bankruptcy prior to the bring this action upon the bailbond do  not discharge the bailbond although it discharge the original debt for that  this be a new and distinct cause of action indeed such certificate shall  discharge the proceed depend against bail in in a case of king v mayor of  Bridgwater m g b r a information be refuse after thirtyfive year acquiescence  under the new charter but the Leominster case which be king v Spencer first  June Tr g b r be not determine upon this point far from it indeed it be refuse  for the insufficiency of the affidavit and not proper prove the bylaw on which  the motion be ground a Michaelmas a rule be make that no information in the  nature of a quo warranto shall be grant on a cause arise above the distance of  twenty year cite on a rule to show cause c king v haw mayor of Winchelsea hill  and that length of time alone less than twenty year will not be sufficient to  refuse grant a information but the objection to daw be that he be not a  resident nor pay scot and lot in September when he be make a freeman which by  the usage of the borough be necessary to entitle he to be admit t his freedom  the court at the distance of nineteen year as this be will not grant the  information to try these fact the rule be to show cause why a information  shall not be grant against he for usurp the franchise of a freeman which the  court say be a fair way of apply than it will have be to have apply for a  information for usurp the office of man or though the court be of opinion that  as the freedom of the city be a necessary qualification to entitle he to be  choose mayor in a information against he for usurp the office of mayor the  want of this qualification to be make free at the time he be make so may be  give in evidence and in that they be very clear though in this case it will  make no difference if it be not so but the cause be argue again the next day  and stand over to Trinity term and then the rule be discharge burrow er p a  action u the old debt who be not already fix so it have be late determine v  ante pa Woolley v Cobbe all which be the case they hint at rule discharge and  order that the sheriff pay the money to the plaintiff the end of Michaelmas  term Geo burrow hilary term geo two b r