case wiseman versus beak follow Talbot v Staniforth I h ORorke v Bolingbroke  App Cas refer to fry v lane Ch d Cf on point of inadequacy of price in sale by  expectant heir case collect in Davis v duke of Marlborough swan note a and  Vict c sacred scripture die Ven of purifying in court lord commissioner Eq can  ab pl Freem S c a tenant for life remainder to his first c son in tail  remainder to his nephew b b enter into several statute to c for payment of ten  for one upon the death of a in case he die without issue male in the life of b  c in the life of a bring a bill to compel b either to pay principal and  interest or to be foreclose of any relief against the bargain b by answer  declare the bargain fair make and intend to abide by it and that he will seek  no relief against it a die and b bring a bill against the executor of c and  notwithstanding b s former answer he be relieve against the bargain on payment  of principal and interest without cost the plaintiff have enter into several  statute of great penalty to the defendant testator defeasanced for payment of  ten for one upon the death of his uncle who be only tenant for life of a  considerable real estate remainder to his first and other son in tail  remainder to the plaintiff in case the uncle die without issue male and the  plaintiff survive he and Vernon chancery case the plaintiff uncle die some  year since without issue the bill be to be relieve against this bargain and to  have up the security on payment of what be real due with interest for the  defendant it be insist that this be not the ordinary case of surprise a young  heir into a hard bargain but Mr wiseman be above thirty near forty year old  when this bargain be make have long be a man in employment to wit a proctor at  doctor be Commons and of experience in the world and beside the defendant  testator several year after this bargain make understanding that the chancery  begin to relieve against such bargain come to advice with Mr sergeant Philips  what be fit to be do in the case and thereupon a bill be exhibit by the  testator against the defendant to compel he either to repay the money with  interest or to be foreclose of any relief against this bargain and that in  answer thereunto in the lifetime of his uncle he elect to stand to the bargain  and that it be fair and duly make and that he will not seek any relief against  the same and therefore ought not now to be relieve against his own election  and oath per cur when he have spend the money then a specious offer be make to  relinquish the bargain on payment of the money lend with interest which at  that time be impossible for he to do and though such bill be exhibit it be not  prosecute but be a contrivance only to double hatch the cheat and therefore  think fit to relieve the plaintiff on payment of principal and interest only  without cost and decree it accord that January there be a entry of a order for  production of deed and that the plaintiff shall attend personal at the hear  Reg lib b fol and also that June of a order for sign and enrol a decree  therein mention to have be make on the that February precede on the petition  of the plaintiff same book fol but no entry of the decree appear batty v Lloyd  ante Vol and case in not there