blisset versus Cranwell all Pas W m c b S C cite in ld raym devise to a and b  and their heir and the long liver of they equal to be divide between they and  their heir make a tenancy in common show Mod vent vent side pollexfen lev S C  comb Wilson Chanc Cas in ejectment upon trial at ken assize a case be make for  the opinion of the court videlicet a be seize of the land in question devise  in these word I give and devise to my two son and their heir and the long  liver of they equal to be divide between they and their heir after the death  of my wife all that my message c the devisor die his wife die one of the son  enter and make his will and devise his part to the lessor of the plaintiff and  die and the defendant be the survive devisee of a and therefore it be agree  that if the two son be jointtenants then this devise be void quoad the  survivor but if by the first will the two son be tenant in common then this  devise to the Salkeld lessor be good and after argument the chief justice  Nevil and rokesby be of opinion that they be tenant in common and that the  devise be good and the reason be upon the construction of will that it ought  to be accord to the intent of the devisor his intent appeal by the word to be  not only to provide for his two son but for their posterity that not only his  two son but their heir shall have a equal part for the word be equal to be  divide between they and their heir and though by the first word it be give to  they and the survivor of they yet the last word explain what be intend by the  word survivor and that the survivor shall have a equal division with the heir  of he that shall die first and though the testator have not apt express  himself yet upon all the word take together his meaning seem to be so that the  case in sty and Ro differ from this case as the c I say for there the  inheritance be fix and settle in the survivor which show plain his intent that  they shall be jointtenants but here the inheritance be appoint to be equal  divide betwixt they and their heir and here the word equal to be divide do  immediate follow the word survivor which show he intend a division in case of  survivorship but in the other case it be otherwise the case upon which they  ground themselves be cro and sty Powell I contra that the exposition of a will  may be enlarge to so great a uncertainty that it be fit to put a stop to it  and that it be the word of the will only that be to explain the testator  intent that the word survivor make a jointtenancy by express word but the word  equal or equal to be divide be take at first only to import a future division  to be make but afterward it be agree that these word also make a tenancy in  common but this be only a exposition collect out of the word where there be no  jointtenancy give by express word No construction of a intent shall be receive  against such express word for this will be to confound the text and he rely  upon the case in Ro sty and conclude for the defendant that the two son be  jointtenants but by the opinion of the three other justice it be adjudge that  they be tenant in common a judgement pro quer b a r ld raym atk that the word  equal to be divide between they Prec in Ch that equal among they Cowp that  equal ves that to be equal divide among they and the survivor of they and  their heir for ever make a tenancy in common in a will vide burr Br Ch atk wms  b a devise to b and c and the survivor of they and their heir equal to be  divide between they create a jointtenancy for life with several inheritance  Barker v Giles wms bro p c Salkeld er p