case wilcocks against BRADELL the wife and daughter of a principal at Oxford  may sue a scholar in the court of the vicechancellor there for assault and  defamation for they have no remedy against he in any other court and therefore  he can disclaim this privilege vide post yearbook Henry pl Inst Inst hetley  jenk cent pl Hardres Godbolt hale Com law ld raym Mod vent hob Bl c intro two  Bl Com wood Inst Bac Abr vern vern stram will Com dig b r h Bac Abr  prohibition by wilcocks against jane Bradell the wife of John Bradell  principal of saint mary hall in Oxford and Christian the daughter of the say  John Bradell to stay their suit in the ViceChancellors court of Oxford for  that whereasJane Bradell have libel against he in the ViceChancellors court of  Oxford for call her bawd and old bawd which be term the action of injury and  Christian for these word scurvy whore and jade and that he do strike her for  stay of these suit sentence be give against he in both wilcocks pray to have  several prohibition and now the agent for the university move for a  consultation and show the charter of the university of the Richard and the  Henry whereby be grant to they that they may inquire of all trespass injury  and of all plead and quarrel and of all other crime and matter except plead of  franktenement where a scholar or their servant or minister are One a part et  getting to know et amendment ind habend secundum the dawn to cause to stand  well custom well secundum law royal power our men England ad will porter ita  quod justice de banc king sive de common banc well a see the mutiny Act croak  car er p justice de assisis non see to send in et si the same justice to seek  after seu aliqualiter understand seu intromitter perstrinxeri tunc super  certificationem notificationem seu signal porter university seu he  commissioner search seu getting to know hujusmodi to sit upon nec part ad to  answer in person the dawn to put down send pars that in person porter seu  commissioner his only to set right et to punish in form prediction and that  these charter be confirm by Act of parliament Elizabeth c and so be recite  verbatim in the Act and because wilcocks be a scholar and master of art of the  say university it be pray that the cause may be remand it be much debate at  the bar and bench for that the party plaintiff be woman who be not any person  privilege there and the defendant who be the scholar do not desire that  privilege but will oppose it and pray these prohibition croak car but the  court agree forasmuch as the charter be that the university shall have  cognizance of those plead where One pars be scholar and so the plaintiff be  thereby enforce to sue there therefore the cause shall be remand