case in chancery uvoodward contra king service of a injunction uvoodward have  a injunction for keep c possession which in truth be issue under seal but no  order or affidavit to warrant it but order and affidavit be after videlicet in  December though injunction be in November one urry deliver Mr king a Copy of  the injunction and as he swear show he the Writ under seal king desire urry to  show he the Writ to examine the Writ and Copy to see how far he be concern in  it which urry deny and king thereupon deliver back the Copy but disturb  uvoodward possession king be prosecute for the contempt it appear sufficient  that there be a disturbance and contempt if the Writ be well serve it be  acknowledge to be a good service prima fancy but when sight if the original be  desire it ought to be show as in Mackalleys case coke report a bailiff or  sheriff make a arrest he need not show the case in chancery er p capias but if  the party require to see it he must show it or the party be not bind to obey  it and if the officer will not show the Writ the party may resist the bailiff  and be not in contempt for his resistance but though it be in case of murder  ensue be excusable and much more be the defendant excusable where a private  person who be no officer serve a process on he if he refuse to show it when he  be request to show his warrant videlicet the Writ else it be he who serve the  Writ be disobey rather than the Writ and otherwise the inconvenience may be  great for if a injunction be not grant but one show another Writ and deliver  the paper and tell the person that it be a true Copy of a injunction to  deliver possession or to deliver up a bind or other write whereas there be no  such injunction if he will not show it however I must believe and either fall  into contempt or lose my possession or deliver up my write to I know not who  and what remedy then for though in an occurrence rei if I disobey I shall be  free because there be no ground of the Writ yet I be in danger and in doubt  till I can examine it and suppose it be true that such injunction be yet  possible I know not of it and then it be very hard that the bare affirmation  of a stranger who serve the Writ which may be be unknown to case in chancery I  and they be common mean person who serve process shall put I on a dilemma  either of contempt or loss of possession or the like but the Lord keeper  declare the service sufficient to ground the contempt for if he shall deliver  it to one party if he keep it how shall the rest be serve with it his lordship  be go to the Council else it may have be reply that it be one thing to show it  to be examine and another to deliver it he be not desire to deliver but to  show it to be examine d such mischief may be prevent if fear be of such  miscarriage by take a duplicate the Lord keeper declare that notwithstanding  the irregularity of issue the injunction it ought to be obey and though the  disturbance which be be by a justice of peace on view of detainer of  possession with force and there be a detainer with force yet that shall not  excuse it for then the process of this court shall be subject to a justice of  the peace