ambler case in the matter of Annesley a lunatic Oct court will not allow  committee of a lunatic any thing for his trouble the editor find upon enquiry  at the office of the secretary of lunatic that the orderbook for the year have  be miss for several year pass petition by Annesley the young son and committee  of the lunatic who have ayear allow he out of the lunatic estate for maintain  the lunatic to be further alloweda sum of money report by the master for his  trouble in take care of the lunatic estate which be large and lie disperse in  England and in Ireland the next of kin who be entitle to the personal estate  of the lunatic after his death consent to his have such allowance so far as by  law they can give such consent but Lord Hardwicke c refuse to make any order  for the rule of the court be otherwise trustee or committee of lunatic appoint  by the court never have any allowance make they for their trouble they be  suppose to have regard for the lunatic and his family and be often his  relation or at least friend and undertake the care upon charitable motive and  therefore as it never have be do he will not make a precedent now for himself  and successor this present case he say have less favourable circumstance in it  than where a stranger be committee for the plaintiff be young son of the  lunatic and be bind in duty to this trust nor be the consent of the next of  kin so far as they be by law capable of consent ground sufficient to obtain  the allowance for it be the rest of the lunatic which the court regard and  though they be next of kin at present yet the lunatic may outlive they and the  personal estate after his death go into other hand but as there must be great  trouble in the management of the estate and to save make a precedent the  petitioner be direct to prefer a petition to have a increase of allowance for  maintenance which petition he be not to take any notice of the master report  and on that petition his lordship say he will order a additional allowance of  pound ayear and the present petition be dismiss anon Ves but this rule be not  universal for there be case in which the court will allow a salary to the  committee see ex part farmer Jacob ex part Ord ib where no person can be find  who will act as committee without recommence a receiver be general appoint  with a salary ex part warren Ves ex part Radcliffe I W ex part billinghurst  post that the court will not make any allowance to trustee for their time and  trouble see Robinson v pell p W chamber v Goldwin Ves burden v burden v b  martial v Holloway Swanst Brocksopp v barn mad and see ailiff v Murray atk re  Ormsby b d