case the lord DARCYS case if the Kina orants a manor with such privilege and  franchise as the dean and chapter of st Paul former enjoy therein it be a good  grant because of the certainty to which it relate SC roll Abr SC more   Ent    dougl term Rep quo warranto against Lord darcy for that he claim to he  discharge from the queen purveyor in his manor of NorthKitby and Walton in the  coul your of Essex he plead that king Edward the four grant to the dean and  chapter of croak Elizabeth Paul diverse liberty within those manor whereof one  be to be discharge of purveyance non to stand before to some place to cause to  stand that afterward in Henry thcis manor come to the king by surrender that  Edward the six grant those manor to Lord darcy the defendant father with all  those liberty franchise and privilege as the dean and chapter ofPauls or any  other have it by reason of any charter or prescription non to stand before to  some place staluto c el eastern warranto he claim those liherties the  replication be that by the Henry c a it be ordain that all place shall he  subject to the king purveyor wherefore c it be thereupon demurrer and argue by  Atkinson for the defendant that inasmuch as the dean and chapter of Paul have  those liherties and privilege and those manor by the grant of king Ed hard the  six be give to Lord barce with all such liherties and privilege as the dean  and chapter of Paul or c ever have with a express clause of non to stand  before to some place to cause to stand the statute thereby be dispense with  which give those liherties to the king and the patentee may well have those  privilege but gawdy and Popham hold contra for the clause be general of all  liherties and privilege c it be to he intend of such liherties and privilege  which the dean and chapter have and be not resume by any statute but this  liberty to he discharge of purveyance be resume by that Henry c wherefore  going shall not he revive by general word but by a special grant of those  liherties by their express name with a express non to stand before of that  statute so that it may appear that the king intend to grant them And therefore  it be agree in the exchequer in notwithstanding this statute Lord paget case  about Elizabeth a for certain liherties claim in the forest of Canhockwood  that whereas liberty of catalla felon be grant by king Henry the six to I S in  that forest and afterward by a private statute en all liberty grant by he be  resume and afterward this forest come to the king by attainder and this forest  be grant over with all the liherties which I S have therein with a non to  stand before to some place to cause to stand yet this liberty which be  reassume be not revive nor pass unless there have be a express mention and  they hold that this statute of Henry c go to the successor although he he not  name c say adjournatur b