case pigot against mary pigot and Elizabeth lewen Trinity term car roll on a  appeal of treason and felony by the heir against the wife and a stranger for  the murder of his father be may take out one or two venires at his election  and if the general issue be join at the bar the same time in which the  appellees be arraign there be no necessity to file the declaration a appeal of  death may be against one for petty treason and another for murder in the same  court appeal of the death of his father who heir be be against the defendant  because that they videlicet the say mary Pigot proditory and Elizabeth lewen  felon conspire the death of Roger Pigot the plaintiff father and late husband  to the say mary and for that purpose the say mary proditory and the say  Elizabeth felony minister to he such a kind of croak car poison in a posset  which be not know drink up and afterward within such a time die so the say  Maryprodilorie and the say Elizabeth felon he murder and kill they be hereupon  arraign in the king bench plead not guilty and a venire facias be award to try  they at the bar in Michaelmas term car and after evidence apparent against the  say mary and doubtful against the say Elizabeth the jury find the say mary  guilty and the say Elizabeth not guilty Charles Jones for the defendant now  move in arrest of judgement that there be not any declaration upon the file in  the say Michaelmas term as it ought to be but Maynard for the plaintiff say  that this appeal be arraign at thb bar in Trinity term car and the defendant  be at the bar instant plead thereto the same term and so it be well enough  without other declaration file which be the usual course in this court and  that no other declaration be to be file but if they have not plead the same  term or if they have plead any other plea than not guilty so as there have be  adjournment to another term then the declaration ought to have be file all the  court be of that opinion hoddesden the secondary say that the usual course be  so a second exception be take because there be but one venire facias where  there ought to have be several venire facias in the appeal so they be several  offender especial the one be charge with treason the other with felony and for  that purpose vouch the old bk of Ent and new bk of Ent Maynard for the  plaintiff thereto answer that the plaintiff may take one venire facias or  several venire facias for doubt of challenge and so be Edward pl all the court  be of this opinion whereupon it be adjudge for the plaintiff and judgement be  give that the say mary shall be burn to death a a see Geo c by which this  judgement be abolish croak car er p