case beck versus rebow see cave v cave vern in re de Falbe ware v tailor Ch  hang chimney glass or pier glass be matter of ornament and furniture and not  to go with the house the plaintiff beck marry the daughter of alderman  chamberlain and in consideration of this marriage and of a settlement make by  the plaintiff beck on his wife and the issue of the marriage alderman  chamberlain covenant to settle his house in Leadenhallstreet on the plaintiff  beck and his wife and the issue of the marriage and likewise covenant to grant  to the plaintiff all the picture upon the staircase over the door and  chimneypieces and all thing fix to the freehold of the message alderman  chamberlain die have make the defendant his executor to who he devise this  house in trust to settle it accord to the marriage article but the defendant  the devisee in trust of the house have after the death of the testator take  away the picture upon the staircase and over the door and chimneys and  likewise the pierglasses hang and chimneyglasses which the plaintiff allege be  as wainscot and fix to the freehold of the house and the bill inter all be  that the defendant shall make a specific peer William performance of the  article and account for the value of the pier glass picture chimneyglasses and  hang which the defendant have take away it be urge for the plaintiff that  these hang pierglasses chimneyglasses and picture be as wainscot be fix with  nail and screw to the freehold and that there be no wainscot under they and  that they will have go to the heir and not to the executor so a strong will  they in this case go to the plaintiff who be as a purchaser of the house in  consideration of marriage and a settlement and especial the covenant be to  grant to the plaintiff all thing fix to the freehold and the case of cave v  cave vern be cite as in point but lordkeeper as to all but the picture over  the door chimneypieces and on the staircase be of a different opinion say that  hang and lookingglass be only matter of ornament and furniture and not to be  take as part of the house or freehold but removable by the lessee of the house  so Harvey v Harvey Str and see squire v mayor Freem ex part Quincy atk Lawton  v Lawton atk Dudley v ware Amb Fitzherbert v shaw h Bl Lawton v salmon ib n  Ponton v Robart east Elwes v maw east Buckland v Butterfield Brod b b more S c  peer William de term S the number three