case chapman against turner a from Mr short manuscript a at the roll February  S c vin Abr come out d p discuss ex part Gilbert Q b joint administrator and  executor must retain all their debt rateably and in proportion to the asset a  and b equal creditor by bind to c who die intestate take out a joint  administration of his good and effect and possess themselves of what effect  they can get into their hand a possess himself of sufficient to pay his debt  but there be not enough leave to pay b his debt whereupon be bring his bill  against a the other administrator to have he account for what he have receive  and that both may be pay their respective debt in proportion to the asset  leave by the intestate the question therefore be whether one administrator can  retain for his own debt against another administrator who have a equal right  with he by virtue of the joint administration and a equal demand by virtue of  his bind modern report er p modern report it be agree by all side that there  be not a case in any of the book exact in point to this the nigh to it be one  in Ro Abr cite by Mr fazakerley where there be two executor or administrator  and one pay a debt due from the intestate to another with his own money for  which he retain so much of the intestate good as amount in the value to the  debt pay and then die intestate his administrator take possession of these  good with the other of his intestate upon which the survive executor bring a  action of trover against the administrator of the decease executor for these  good but it be hold that the decease executor may retain they for the debt  which he pay of testator and therefore his administrator be well entitle to  they by the administration and may retain they against the survive executor  but Verney master of the roll say that the executor do not take the good as a  retainer for the debt which he pay but as a purchaser of they for a valuable  consideration for a administrator or executor can pay debt with the specific  good or effect of a testator or intestate but he must sell these good or  effect and pay the debt with the money arise from such sale therefore if a  administrator pay a debt of the intestate and take good c to the amount of  that debt he be to be look upon as a purchaser of those good for a valuable  consideration and so his executor or administrator will be entitle to such  good in the same manner as to any other of the testator or intestate good and  it be order that a account shall be take of the intestate effect and that both  a and b shall be pay their debt rateably and proportionable to the asset leave  by the intestate