case Haywood against davis and another plead in a action of trespass Middlesex  to wit be it remember that on Friday next after three week from the day of  saint Michael in this same term before the lady the queen at Westminster come  Rebecca Haywood by William smyth her attorney and bring into the court of the  say lady the queen now here her certain bill against Margaret Davis otherwise  Davison and mary bonner in custody of the marshal c of a plea of trespass and  there be pledge of prosecute namely John do and Richard roe which say bill  follow in these word that be to say Middlesex to wit Rebecca Haywood complain  of Margaret Davis otherwise Davison and mary bonner in the custody of the  marshal of the Marshalsea of our lady the queen before the queen herself be  for that they the same Margaret and mary on the first day of October in the  first year of the reign of our lady whether now queen of England c with force  and arm c the close and courtyard of the say Rebecca in the parish of  Stebunheath otherwise Stepney in the county of Middlesex aforesaid break and  enter and her the say Rebecca in the quiet use and occupation of the say close  and courtyard do then and there disturb and binder and also for that they the  same Margaret and mary afterward to wit the day and year aforesaid with force  and arm c another close and courtyard of the same Rebecca in the parish and  county aforesaid do break and enter and five hundred pail of water and other  water of the same Rebecca to the value of twenty shilling from and out of a  certain fountain of her the same Rebecca in the parish and county aforesaid be  without the licence of her the say Rebecca and against her will from and out  of the fountain aforesaid then and there do take and carry away and also for  that they the same Margaret and mary afterward to wit the same day and year  last abovesaid with force and arm a great quantity of dirt soil and water in  and upon the land and another courtyard of the same Rebecca in the parish and  county aforesaid do then and there put place pour out and cast forth and other  enormity to the same Rebecca do then and there commit against the peace of our  say lady the queen that now be and to the damage of her the say Rebecca thirty  and nine shilling and therefore she bring this suit c and the say Margaret and  mary in their proper person come and defend the force and injury c and pray  judgement of the say bill of her the say Rebecca and that the same bill may be  quash because they say that the close and courtyard and also the place in  which the say trespass be suppose to be do be and at the same time in which c  be one acre of land and that the say Rebecca at the same time in which c have  nothing in the same acre of land unless together and undividedly with the say  mary bonner who be in full life at the parish of Stepney in the county of  Middlesex and this they be ready to verify wherefore they pray judgement of  the say bill and that the same bill may be quash c and the say Rebecca say  that the aforesaid bill of her the say Rebecca for the reason before allege  ought not to be quash because she say that she at the several time the several  trespass aforesaid be suppose to be commit be sole modern er p seize of the  say close and courtyard in the declaration of her the say Rebecca first  mention and also of the say close and courtyard in the declaration aforesaid  of her the say Rebecca second mention and of the aforesaid fountain in that  declaration in like manner mention and also of the three courtyard in the say  declaration of the say Rebecca three mention and that the aforesaid Margaret  and mary at the say several time when c do commit the several trespass  aforesaid as the say Rebecca by her say declaration above complain against  they without that that the say mary bonner at the respective time aforesaid or  any of they have any thing in the say premise or any of they and she pray that  this may be inquire by the country and the say Margaret Davis otherwise  Davison and mary bonner say that the plea aforesaid by her the say Rebecca  Haywood in manner and form above by their say replication plead and the matter  in the same contain be not sufficient ill law to compel they the say Margaret  and mary to answer the bill of her the say Rebecca to which say plea they the  same Margaret and mary deed not neither by the law of the land be they bind in  any manner to answer and this they be ready to verify wherefore for want of a  sufficient replication of the say Rebecca in this behalf they the say Margaret  and mary as before pray judgement of the say bill of her the say Rebecca and  that the same bill may be quash and for cause of demurrer in law in this  behalf accord to the form of the statute in such case late make and provide  the say Margaret and mary here show to the court these cause follow for that  the say plea of her the say Rebecca be double uncertain and want form and  conclude to the country and the say Rebecca Haywood say that the plea  aforesaid by her the say Rebecca in manner and form aforesaid in her  replication above plead and the matter in the same contain be good and  sufficient in law to compel they the say Margaret Davis and mary bonner to  answer the bill aforesaid of her the say Rebecca which say plea and the matter  in the same contain the same Rebecca be prepare to verify and prove as the  court c and because the say Margaret and mary have not answer that plea nor  have hitherto in any wise contradict it the same Rebecca pray judgement and  that the say Margaret and mary may further answer the say bill of her the say  Rebecca c but because the court of our say lady the queen now here be not yet  advice of give their judgement of and concern the premise a day therefore be  give to the say party before our lady the queen at Westminster until Tuesday  next after eight day from the day of saint Martin for hear their judgement of  and concern the premise for that the court of our say lady the queen now here  be not yet thereof c