bachelor against parson Trin banc sup mich rot error to reverse a judgement in  debt bachelor bring a writ of error to reverse a judgement give against he for  parson in a action of debt in the common plea and the error assign be that  there be two declaration in the record  one in the emparlance roll the other  in the plea roll and the original certify upon the writ of error do not  warrant the first declaration for it be file after it hale answer that the  record be good enough if the original do warrant the last declaration for this  be the common course use in the Comn on plea as the clarks there do inforin I  there be many case like this in the common plea wile of council on the other  side answer that this be a strangp course for they ought first to file the  original because it be the beginning and groundwork of the suit and it not be  so do here the judgement be give without a original this be a judgement by  default and the imparlance be part of the suit roll chief justice the  imparlance roll be the principal part of the suit and to confound thing by  intendment that the imparlance may be touch another suit be not good and it  matter not what the custom be in the common plea if it be against law and both  roll ought to be certify here jerman justice ad idem roll chi f justice all  the record in the common plea which be in the custody of the chief justice  there ought to be certify by he upon the return of the writ of error and here  the imparlance roll be in his custody and therefore he ought to certify it and  if there be two writ of error and one be good and the other nought we will  take the best to affirm the judgement the original ought not to be fit to the  declaration but the declaration to the original because the original be the  foundation of the suit and therefore the course use in style report the common  plea be a preposterous course videlicet to declare against the defendant and  after to file a original against he to warrant the declaration it be here  certify to be one record and how can we take the imparlance roll to be part of  the record it be not certified with it and if there be variance between the  emparlance roll and the plea roll it be error we will advice but we must not  suffer new way yet we be loath notwithstanding to reverse judgement give in  the common plea therefore show cause next term why the judgement shall not be  reverse style report er p