case clayton against coatsworth a declaration in trespass that the defendant  way et arms break and enter a ship and also take and carry away good and  convert they to their own use and also assault and threaten the sailor and  also detain the master per quod the ship can not proceed on her voyage by  which he lose the profit et alian irregular c be good after verdict trespass  for take good and threaten the sailor so as the ship and good can not go c be  not repugnant in trespass for break and enter at a and also take such good the  nec non after verdict couple the venue for the break with the charge of take  the good away declaration in trespass for that the defendant together with a b  on the thirty of march in the second year e way et arms a certain ship belong  to the plaintiff call the William and Deborah at then load with diverse good  of the plaintiff to break in pieces et to go into and the cabin of the same  ship then and there divulsit et diripui nec non good et catalla videlicet two  hundred librar lead c do take and carry away and to their own use do convert  and dispose and also on the mariner of the say ship belong be the servant of  the plaintiff do then make a assault and to the say mariner tale mina de vita  et imprisonment then and there to place upon and they with in assault and  affray adtunc et ibidem designated that they can not go their jury videlicet  voyage for two day and one of the say mariner videlicet the master do then and  there imprison and detain by two day per quod the ship can not proceed in the  voyage shower KB for seventeen week per quod he lose the profit of his good et  all irregular c contra peace c the defendant plead not guilty and verdict for  the plaintiff and forty pound damage I move in arrest of judgement that here  be case and trespass join both trespass way et arms trover conversion and  special case all jumble in one count say non allocatur per curian for that it  be only a aggravation and in the register be abundance of precedent of that  nature second exception it be repugnant because he say we take and carry the  good c and yet threaten the seaman so that the ship and good can not go c and  they can be intend different good c answer that the latter be only a  aggravation three exception that there be no venue lie where the good be take  away and this can be couple for it be as a distinct count the defendant may  have be find guilty of this part and not guilty of the break c in the case of  Danett v Collingden mich car in this court a on Mr holt motion in arrest a  show shower KB er p of judgement in trespass for take averia to express grief  videlicet One horse et One equan nor One cap or hat made of skin hold ill  because it lie no property in the hat but per curian the nor though it do  couple they yet it can not be call in averia but in the present case the nor  couple all and it be but one sentence so that it be well enough after a  verdict for the nor be copulative c and so judgement for the plaintiff