ambler case jordan against Holkham Holcombe Dec estate give to a wife during  widowhood with remainder over it be good as a limitation but if give over on  her marry again within a limit time it operate as a forfeiture see Fearn count  Rem in chancery lib Reg a foe a on exception to answer Barret bow by will that  October devise his land to his wife during her widowhood and if it shall  happen my wife shall marry again then my daughter mary shall enter provide if  my wife marry and survive my daughter the estate shall return to her during  Lord Hardwick chancellor take a distinction when a estate be give widowhood  with remainder over in that case she take a estate for I determinable on her  marry and the remainder over take effect on determination of her estate either  by death or marriage in the present case it be give during widowhood with  emainders over on her marry again within a limit time that be in the lifetime  of his daughter and be by way of forfeiture the fact of this case be not give  in the register book but there be a entry of the that of December the day  mention above of the cause have come on to be hear when the bill be dismiss  the editor have examine the original bill and answer in the six clerk office  from which it appear that the testator devise all his real estate to mary bow  his wife during her widowhood she pay out of the income of the say estate the  yearly sum of pound for the maintenance and education of his daughter mary bow  until she be seventeen year of age at which time he give his say daughter the  sum of pound to be pay by her say mother and after the decease of his say wife  he give and bequeathe to his say daughter all his say real estate and to the  heir of her body for ever and after the decease of his say wife and daughter  leave no issue or heir of her body behind her then his will and intent be the  all his say real estate shall descend and come unto the right and possession  of such son of I jordan as his say wife shall nominate and appoint and for  want of such appointment he give the say estate to the plaintiff the son of  John jordan and his heir for ever and then the will proceed and be it further  know that my will be that if it shall so happen that my wife after my decease  shall marry again that then and at that time my say daughter shall immediate  enter into possession and enjoy all my say land c and be it provide that in  case my say wife shall marry and survive my say daughter it be my will that my  say estate shall return to my wife she pay pound ayear to the maintenance and  education of I jordan the plaintiff who be to enjoy the estate after her day  the daughter attain seventeen and die short after the death of the daughter  the widow intermarry with George Holcombe and about five year after death  leave her husband survive her upon her death she have make no appointment the  plaintiff John jordan enter into possession of the premise and file his bill  against the husband George Holcombe pray that he may pay the say yearly sum of  pound from the time of his marriage with the say widow to the time of her  decease the answer deny that the contingency have happen upon which the say  sum become Payable and further state that it be not certain that the plaintiff  will have be entitle to the estate after the decease of the widow as jordan  have two other son to either of who the widow may have appoint but admit that  no such appointment be make it appear from the register book as above that the  bill be dismiss the statement in the text that the case come on upon exception  must be erroneous ambler er p