case Kynaston against lloyd and other in the exchequer land give in  consideration of money and marriage by a wife father to husband and wife in  special tail with remainder to the wife in tail general remainder to her  sister in fee be not within the Henry c although the valuable consideration  pay by the husband be to the full value of the land ante   a   palm Jones  Plowd more dyer   light a cro car cro Elizabeth Leon Plowd onslow n p  ejectment for land in Boditham in denbighshire of a lease of Andrew Kynaston  for three year upon not guilty plead and trial in the county of Salop be the  next county upon a special verdict the case be find to be thus David bee  Richard be seize in fee of the land in question which be find to be of the  annual value of twenty pound now and at the time of the assurance and have  only two daughter and coheir videlicet Margaret and mary by indenture betwixt  he and John Kynaston Elizabeth covenant with the say John Kynaston in  consideration of marriage betwixt the say John Kynaston and the say Margaret  and in consideration of one hundred and fifteen pound to be pay by the say  John Kynaston at such day to assure those land by fine to the use of himself  for life and after to the use of the say John Kynaston and Margaret and the  heir of their body remainder to the heir of the body of Margaret remainder to  the say mary and her right heir the assurance be make accord and the marriage  take effect John Kynaston a vide ante clerk v Thompson Hancock v field croak  James er p pay the one hundred and fifteen pound afterward the say John  Kynaston and Margaret have issue Andrew Kynaston lessor of the plaintiff the  say John Kynaston die his wife Margaret take a second husband and alien by  fine to I Lloyd the defendant Andrew Kynaston enter for the forfeiture and let  we to the plaintiff and whether this croak throw be a estate within the  statute of Henry c be the sole question it be several time argue at the bar on  the plaintiff part by John Jeffere and Glanville and by sergeant Jones and  George croak on the part of the defendant and much enforce on the plaintiff  part that it be within the word and intent of the statute it be purchase by  the husband for a valuable sum of money accord to the estate for it be but a  reversion expectant upon a estate for life of twenty pound a year for which  one hundred and fifteen pound be a sufficient consideration but against it be  argue that it be the land of the wife father so it be a inheritance move from  the ancestor of the wife and be in consideration of marriage which be intend  the principal and original consideration although there be payment of money  yet this be a real consideration the other but personal which be not regard so  much and therefore it be out of the statute of Henry c also it be as a gift in  frankmarriage where the donee have a inheritance by those word so here and all  the baron be of opinion that this be not any jointure within the statute of  Henry c because the land move from the wife father and her advancement in  marriage be intend to be the cause of the gift and not the money and this  appear because the limitation be to her and her husband in special tail and  after to the wife in general tail and for default of her issue to her sister  in fee so as the father principal intend the advancement of his daughter and  although the husband pay one hundred and fifteen pound that be not intend as a  valuable price for the land but to have the estate limit to he as well as to  his wife so as he may have the land although he have no issue wherefore it be  adjudge for the defendant a case be cite Elizabeth in the court of ware where  smith be seize of land of the value of twelve thousand pound by indenture  covenant with sir John Littleton in consideration of marriage betwixt William  Littleton son of the say sir John Littleton and Margaret daughter and heir of  the say smith and for thirteen hundred mark pay by the say sir John Littleton  to assure the land to the use of himself for life and after to the use of  smith for life and after to the use of William Littleton and Margaret and the  heir of the body of the say William on the body of the say Margaret remainder  to the right heir of William Littleton the land be hold by knightservice in  capite the marriage take effect the conveyance be make accord afterward smith  die the question be whether this be a conveyance within the statute of Henry c  for the advancement of his child that the king shall have a three part or as a  conveyance for that money for then the king shall have nothing and it be  resolve that it be a conveyance within the statute of Henry c although money  be part of the cause yet the principal cause by intendment be the daughter  marriage and advancement wherefore by advice of the chief justice upon a case  make and argue before they it be resolve to be within the statute and a decree  make accord