case capel versus brewer Julii Lord chancellor a farmer of the excise have  estate of his own sufficient to satisfy what he owe the king take out a extent  in aid against a person who owe he money and have fail decree to refund with  cost the bill be to be relieve against a extent out of the exchequer take out  by the contrivance of a farmer of the excise who have a debt owe he by a man  that fail procure the kin to take that debt in aid and by that mean to defeat  all the other creditor per cur it be become a common practice and a great  oppression in the city that any accountant to the king shall sell wine upon  credit at a extravagant price and when the man fail a execution come as the  first process out of the exchequer at the king suit and sweep away all so that  all other just creditor be defeat and a commission of bankrupt render  ineffectual and therefore declare that where a farmer of the excise as the  principal case be or other accountant to the king have sufficient estate of  his own to satisfy the king debt and shall use this trick to defeat other  creditor by get the debt owe to he to be take in aid of the debt to the king  such person shall refund with cost and decree it accord the defendant in this  case acknowledge that he be able otherwise to satisfy the king debt Reg lib of  fol vide contra Dickinson v Molineaux pre Ch with a quaere by reporter the  court of chancery have no jurisdiction to set aside extent in aid such cause  be proper for the exchequer brown v Bradshaw ibidem so brown v Sandys post vol  otherwise where defendant confess he have sufficient estate of his own to pay  the king debt ibidem for a investigation of the doctrine and case on the  subject of the interference of equity in respect of extent in aid vide  Phillips v shaw Ves note it be observe with regard to the principal case that  the bill be only against the party that prefer himself and the decree be only  against he to refund upon the fraud and that they do not meddle with the  extent vide brown v Bradshaw pre Ch extent in aid have be great restrain by  stat Geo c and by rule of the court of exchequer and June it be order that  from henceforth no fiat for a extent in aid shall be grant unless the party  apply for the same or some person or person on his behalf shall make affidavit  that unless the process of extent for the debt due to he from his debtor be  forthwith issue the debt due to the crown from the party apply will be in  danger of be lose to the crown sand d note h t edit