clxxxv sir henry GOODIERS case renounce of a executorship in a ejection strong  the case be sir Ralph Rowlet possess of certain land for year make his will  and ordain sir Nicholas Bacon keeper of the great seal of brand sir Robert  Catline Lord chief justice of England justice Southcote and Gerrard attorney  general his executor and die and afterward the say person name executor send  their letter to the chief officer of the prerogative court as follow whereas  our love friend sir Ralph Rowlet knight late decease make and ordain we  executor of his last will and whereas our business be so great that we can  attend the execution of the say will therefore we have think good to move the  bearer hereof Mr Henry Goodier one of the coheir of the say sir Ralph to take  upon he the execution of the say will and therefore we pray you to grant  letter of Administration in as ample manner as the justice of the cause do  require and afterward a entry be make in this manner in the same court  executor testament predict performance ind super see assumere distulera thus  far to stand apart and upon that the say Goodier obtain letter of  Administration and grant a lease to a for year of which the say sir Ralph  Rowlet die possess and afterward sir Robert Catline claim as executor grant  the same term to another c and all the matter of difficulty be if this letter  write by the executor be a sufficient renunciation of the executorship in law  so as the executor can afterward claim or use the say authority c if the entry  of the say renunciation be sufficient and effectual and it be argue by ford  one of the doctor of the civil law that as well the renunciation as the entry  of it be good and sufficient in law so that none of the executor can not after  intermeddle and he say that in their law there be not any certain form of  renunciation but if the meaning and intention of the renouncer appear it be  sufficient without any formal term of renunciation and he put many rule and  maxim in their law to the same purpose ego form ne mollo be to hang be  sufficient word to such intent non vult haeres be quin ad alian transferee  debet heir who semel repudiavi heir non to be able she to fall upon again quod  semel to please post to displease non to be able divergence of behavior non to  let pass in shrinking so that after the Leonard er p executor have signify to  the officer of their court their pleasure to renounce the execution of the  will they can afterward intermeddle nam interest republic ut owner a thing to  be in certainly and as to the entry of the say renunciation inter acta curiae  distuleri et thus far to stand apart that be the error of the clark and it be  rule in our law veritas a thing to bear about non to make faulty wandering  fanctorum and the Lord Anderson demand of the say doctor how far those word  haeres et inheritance do extend in their law who answer that inheritance  comprehend all chattel as well real as personal inheritance as well as chattel  for by their law inheritance nihilaliud be how succession in whole world law  quod death to have tempore death of oneself and afterward the court give day  to the other party to bear a argument of their side but the case be so clear  that no professor of the civil law will be retain to argue to the contrary and  afterward judgement be give that the say renunciation and the entry of it be  sufficient Owen office of executor cro   Leonard mich Elizabeth in the common  plead