case edward Jackson a infant plaintiff whether Jackson and other defendant  where there be a fall of stock without the neglect of the trustee he be not  liable to make good the deficiency but be answerable only as far as the value  especial where it be specific stock the sum of pound have be convey to trustee  for the benefit of mary the plaintiff mother during her coverture and for a  provision for child and if no issue then the husband of mary if his necessity  require it with the approbation of the trustee may sell the pound the  plaintiff mother mary before her marriage be possess of pound Southsea stock  which accord to the then price of that stock be value at pound it be agree  that pound part of this pound shall be settle on mary and her child by the  marriage the settlement recite that mary be possess of pound principal money  for which sum the trustee under the settlement give a receipt but in fact no  part of the pound SouthSea stock be sell to raise this pound except pound  which sell for pound out of which sum whether Jackson one of the trustee  retain pound in order to make up with the remain pound Southsea stock the say  sum of pound afterward the pound Southsea stock great fall in value plaintiff  bring his bill to have the deficiency of the pound principal money make good  decree that so far as the bill seek to make up the pound principal money as  the value of the pound Southsea stock be dismiss and a account be direct of  what be due for the pound Southsea stock and the pound part of the produce of  the sale of the say pound Southsea stock as aforesaid with interest at pound  per cent from mary death Reg lib a fol vide Trafford v boehm post vol whether  Jackson the mother of mary and her uncle be the trustee under the  marriagesettlement and the pound be pay into their hand mary Jackson be by the  trust allow to make a will during the coverture and to dispose of this money  as if she be a feme sole mary Jackson live but four year before her death she  make a will and devise the pound in trust for the benefit of her husband as to  the interest thereof during his life and for the infant as to the principal  and if the infant die the whole for the husband whether Jackson the mother of  mary pay the interest for the pound for a considerable time atkins er p insist  by her counsel that as the stocksare fall she be only answerable as far as the  value of the stock especial as it be specific stock and the fortune of her  daughter lie in this specific stock and therefore ought not to be consider as  money especial as stock be of such a fluctuate nature and liable to such  frequent change and that the money pay to the daughter be only the dividend of  the stock atkins but it appear in the cause that the receipt from the daughter  to the mother be for interest general and nothing be mention in they of stock  the settlement too recite the daughter to be possess of pound principal money  in her own right Lord chancellor this be a mere fall of stock without the  trustee neglect and therefore come under the last clause of that e statute of  Geo make for the indemnity of guardian and trustee which provide that if there  be a diminution of the principal without the default of the trustee they shall  not be liable it have be say that after the stock fall the trustee pay  interest for pound amount to much more than the produce from the dividend and  therefore to a demonstration it appear to be a trust for money but it be well  know that during the golden dream people be so infatuate as to look upon  imaginary wealth as equal valuable with so much money it have be say that long  after the fall of the stock the defendant whether Jackson continue pay the  same interest but still it do not answer either way for it do not amount to  the common rate of interest and yet be more than the dividend of the fall  stock and to compel trustee to make up a deficiency not owe to their wilful  default be the harsh demand that can be make in a court of equity  notwithstanding antecedent to the marriage it be agree by the defendant to  take the stock at seven hundred and fifty and a transfer make accord yet this  court will never oblige a trustee to acquiesce under so hard and unreasonable  a contract mary Jackson in her will recite the deed of settlement and her  power of devise the counsel for the plaintiff insist the devise to the husband  be illegal make and not pursuant to the power and have endeavour to show from  the whole tenor of the marriagearticle she have no power of dispose of any  part of the money for the benefit of her husband to the prejudice of the  infant the plaintiff and rely principal upon the follow proviso provide  nevertheless that no part of the principal money shall be apply to the use of  the say Edward Jackson without the consent of the trustee under hand and seal  to the end that this sum may be keep entire for the advantage of the infant I  be of opinion that mrs mary Jackson have no power to dispose of the principal  to the prejudice of the infant but in one particular circumstance therefore  the this position she have make be not pursuant to the power his lordship  direct that the defendant whether Jackson shall account for the whole interest  of the pound stock from the death of mark Jackson atkins the father of the  plaintiff appear to be sufficient competent his lordship will give no  direction with regard to her maintenance for he say that whether a infant  shall have a allowance of maintenance during the life of the father depend  always upon the particular circumstance of the case see butler v butler post  vol oh atkins er p