case ex part GREIGNIER August the saint the court will not set asideathe  choice of assignee because some of creditor live beyond sea and have no  opportunity of vote the application to the court be for new assignee upon a  suggestion in the petition that the time be too short which the commissioner  have appoint for the choice of assignee the person have be find a bankrupt  only on the saint of may and the sit for the choice of assignee be on the  first of June that the debt prove at the time of the choice amount only to  pound and the petitioner live abroad can not in so short a time send over  letter of attorney atkins to vote in the choice though their demand upon the  bankrupt estate will not be less than pound that the assignee already choose  be a hatter and not to be suppose conversant in foreign affair in which the  bankrupt concern chielfly lie for the petitioner the case ex part Anderson be  cite which be hear by Lord Macclesfield upon petition who order a new choice  of assignee on a suggestion that a great number of creditor can not possible  be present at the first choice Lord chancellor the word of the act of the that  of George the second be the commissioner shall forthwith after they have  declare the person against who the commission shall issue a bankrupt cause  notice thereof to be give in the London gazette and shall appoint a time and  place for the creditor to meet in order to choose a assignee or assignee of  the bankrupt estate and effect so that they be immediate to appoint a time and  place for the choice of assignee because it may be necessary to take care of  the bankrupt estate and effect and I must not lie it down as a rule that  because some of the creditor be abroad and beyond sea therefore I must at all  event give they a opportunity of vote in the choice and direct the creditor to  proceed to a new choice if this be to prevail the choice must be postpone to a  great length of time which atkins er p will be direct contrary to the act of  parliament and therefore the true rule be that the assignee ought to be  continue unless the petitioner can show there be some objection with regard to  the substance or integrity of she person who be choose assignee but to do what  be pray by the petition will be add to the expense by make two choice of  assignee instead of one I desire that precedent may be search to see if they  can find any case where it have be order that creditor shall proceed to a  second choice u on a suggestion mere that some of they live remote from London  or be out of England but no such case be to be find and beside it will be a  dangerous rule and therefore I be of opinion that the petition must be dismiss  and the assignee continue who be already choose