case lord sand against pinner Trinity term Elizabeth roll in plead a  prescription for a way in right of a parsonage if the plaintiff allege that he  be seize in jure church it be good without aver that he be parson there or  that the parsonage be within the will allege d if the terminus ad who he  descrihed as the hamlet of l inthe parish of m it shall he intend that they be  both one Com dig trespass quare enclosed space to break in pieces vocal  Cadbury GrouWds at mottes on it the defendant plead that ante time quo c el  prcedicto tempore quo c he be et thus far be dericus et seisitus de Elizabeth  n reclorid church parochin de motte font prcedict in Motles/ont prce ac de et  in to make one messuagio vocal the parsonage parcel rectorice prCedid in of  his ut de Jeodo in jure ecclesice juice predict and that he and all his  predecessor guide ecelesiev prcedicke and all those who estate he have have in  the say house have have from time whereof c away from that house over the  place where to a hamlet call Lockerley infra parochian de Holles/ont prcedict  to carry his corn and tithe grow in the say hamlet to the say house from the  say hamlet c the issue be upon the prescription and find for the plaintiff it  be move in arrest of judgement that this plea be not good for he allege a  prescription in himself and all his predecessor parson of the say parish and  show not that he be parson there and so he do not enable himself to the  prescription but because it be allege that he be a clerk and seize of the  parsonage injure church although he do not say that he be parson yet it be  good enough for he can be seize in jure ecdesice unless he be parson so it  tantamounts and therefore well enough secondl because it be not allege in what  will the say house be whereto he claim the way for it may be it be in another  will say non allocatur for the parson shall he always intend to he resident  within his parsonage wherefore it be intend that the parsonagehouse be within  the say will where the parish be allege to he videlicet in mottesfont a but  the plaintiff may have sue the defendant by the name of John Winslow and if he  have plead a misnomer he mi he have reply the estoppel line v hook Mod Cas l c  b Parker ms croak Elizabeth er p three for that the v venire facias be only of  mottesfont and not from Lockerley also it be therefore allege that it be a  mistrial wherefore c but all the court hold that forasmuch as Lockerley be  mention as a hamlet infra parochian de mottesfont it shall he intend that the  parish and will of mottesfont be both one and then it shall he take to he the  hamlet of mottesfont for although a parish may he extend to many will yet it  shall not he conceive to he so unless it he show and to that purpose dowdy  cite long quint Edward that where croak Elizabeth one be name of a parish it  be a good addition wherefore it be adjudge for the plaintiff