Bulstrode scriven plaintiff against wright defendant habeas corpus hearing  complaint Scriven have a judgement against wright in a action of debt and for  this have he in execution in the king bench afterward he remove himself by a  habeas corpus into the chancery and so upon this he be commit to the prison of  the fleet afterward he procure a release to be forge whereby Scriven have  release unto he the say execution this release be show and examine by the  master of the chancery there be procure a hearing complaint and a to know  facias against Scriven returnable at such a day in the chancery to show cause  why he shall not be discharge of and from the say execution and so he be bail  by some knight of the post and set at liberty and the court of the king bench  be inform of this William justice there be no book in the law to warrant such  proceed that upon a judgement give in any of the king court a hearing  complaint shall lip and a to know facias upon this returnable in the chancery  but only in the same court where the judgement be give for that they have the  best knowled thou of all the proceed in the same case the matter be hang  before they but if the judgement have be upon a recognizance upon a  statutestaple or statutemerchant there in such a case the same may have be  returnable in the chancery to show cause why he shall not be discharge of the  say judgement and execution because the recognizance be there before they and  they may there judge of this and this be the difference in such case to be  observe and herein all the judge do clear agree with he and the case between  Ross and pope in Plowdens commentary fol be cite to this purpose afterward the  truth of the matter be make know in chancery unto the Lord chancellor and also  the fraudulent deal and proceed of the say wright in obtain the say release  and so thefeby endeavour to avoid the execution upon the say judgement which  Scriven have against he all this undue practice appear to the Lord chancellor  he do hereupon cast he and his cause out of the court of chancery and leave he  to the commonlaw and upon this he be before in execution in the Marshalsea  Yelverton move for Scriven to have wright again in execution upon the first  judgement and upon this the rule of the court be quod to stay behind hic in  executioner ut prius to be accord IlntO the former judgement