case Hobbs who tam c against young Hilary term will mary roll or a merchant  who hire clothworker and dyer to make and die clothes for the purpose of  export they abroad in the way of trade be liable to the restraint and penalty  of Elizabeth c S although all the journeyman so employ have f raym vent march  g keb Mod h march I vent style king side lev raym stram burr Com dig shower KB  er p serve regular apprenticeship to their respective trade and the work be do  in his own house SC post SC salk SC Mod SC comb SC Carth SC holt debt on the  statute of Elizabeth c on not guilty plead a special verdict find the  defendant a merchant trade by exportation to Turkey never apprentice to the  clothworker that for his own merchandise be employ journeyman in his own house  who have be apprentice and such one to overlook and give they all weekly or  yearly wage c argue for the plaintiff that this be use the trade c that by the  statute Edward c artificer be to hold to one mystery that the Edward c repeal  that only as to merchant and so the Edward c continue till Elizabeth c that he  who can use a mystery himself can employ other for that purpose and so be the  case of mason v nightingale James for the trade of pinmaking resolve within  the statute though be employ none but those who have be apprentice in the case  of pardoe v couth the same opinion and a verdict for the plaintiff in Dalton  just one take a miller and employ he in his trade this be a trade if not for  the private use of his family a merchant can brew for transportation it be not  for the use of his own family here though the poor man have wage yet they have  not the benefit of the trade as if they do it themselves e contra argue it be  not find that the defendant have utter any of these commodity in England but  it be find quite otherwise that he export English clothes to Turkey at  commonlaw all trade be free and be so till this statute and never any  construction be make of this by equity No man will say a merchant be within it  if he buy and export a commodity the preamble of the statute be for husbandry  shower KB and art and mystery in England the make of his cloth be here but the  mercbandizing of it be abroad this statute meddle with merchant only as to  take of apprentice not as to the probibiting clause of use the trade c here  the end of the law be answer that the cloth be work and manufacture by those  that have be apprentice he have not personal use it nor be be within the  clause of set on work those who have not be apprentice in the city of London    I may exercise a trade for my private family I may employ a man for that use  the defendant have not do this for the sake of any trade in England this  statute have be always construe strict as in the case of Rotheram v morris at  Shrewsbury a man be a mercer and he sell bat and the party be apprentice to he  as mercer he may use the trade of batter a in the petty town it be usual b  because serve to he who do so a wife that have concern herself in the trade  may use it when a widow if she live with her husband seven year c for she  shall be construe within the word to have serve as a apprentice though never  be one beside by the statute the set person on work who have not be apprentice  be another offence and perhaps that be a evidence of the use of a trade but  when it be find that he only set man on work that can be a use of a trade holt  chief justice Horner be a ancient trade for the press of horn and a comb maker  do press horn d for his own service in his own trade and hold he be within the  statute e a Carth comb Mod salk ld ray b Mod burr Rep c cro car bend palm    hut hob sand ld ray d at the assize at Cambridge see Mod e in Trinity term the  judge deliver their opinion seriatim and judgement give for the plaintiff post  page shower KB er p