case sallow against Girling easter term James roll on a submission to four so  as any three or two make a award under hand and seal a award by two be good  but a plea that it be under their hand only be bad Yelv more roll Rep Bulst  palm Mod stram neglect of arbitrator to take notice of all matter submit must  be plead in bar if a award be of all matter except obligation it be good for  the exception be a award that the bind shall remain in force debt upon a  obligation condition to stand to the award of a b c and d of all action and  demand between they so as the say arbitrator or any three or two of they do  make the say award under their hand and seal before such a day the defendant  plead that neither they nor any three or two of they make any award or  arbitrament the plaintiff show that two of they make a award under their hand  videlicet that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff three pound at such a  day and that the one shall release to the other all action and debt except  obligation make for performance of former award and for nonpayment of the say  three pound he bring this action whereupon croak throw it be demurrer the  question be whether this award by two be good because the first part of the  condition be that all the submission be to four and not to three or two of  they which only come under the so as and all the justice conceive it to be  good enough for it be a explanation of the former part and as well as if it  have be insert therein for all shall be expound together and to make one  entire clause and to show how they shall have their authority vide Richard fol  Edward Fleming CJ doubt thereof for he hold that so as imply as much as that  two only be necessary to put their hand and seal but all four ought to make  the award the first exception be because they do not make the arbitrament of  all matter submit to they but except that they will not meddle with former  award and former bind and when arbitrator do not make their award of all thing  submit to they but refuse to meddle with part it be a void arbitrament as  Elizabeth dyer but it be then answer if the defendant will take advantage  thereby that the arbitrator refuse to intermeddle with any matter submit to  they he ought to have show it by way of bar that such thing be submit and  notify to they and that they do not make any award concern they otherwise the  court shall not intend that they have notice of any such matter and although  they except that they will not meddle with any bind for the performance of  former arbitraments non constat that there be any bind because it be in the  generality and so be Baspoles case   a all the justice except Fleming be of  this opinion croak James er p but he doubt thereof because they except they in  their award and it be not to be intend that they will have except they unless  there have be such but for another reason he conceive it to be well enough for  their award therein be they award that they except c which be as much as to  say they award that they shall stand in their force which be a good award  wherefore it be adjudge for the plaintiff vide Richard Henry and Edward pl pl  pl note a writ of error be bring upon this judgement in the exchequer Chamber  and this point be assign for error but it be resolve to be well enough for the  word subsequent explain it that it may be make by two or three of they but  because it be show that the arbitrament be under their hand and do not say  under their hand and seal for this cause it be reverse see o will c