coke b BOTHYS case mich James in the common plea when a act by the condition  of a bind to be perform to the obligee be of its nature transitory and no time  be limit although a place be express the act ought to be perform in convenient  time and when the act to be perform be of its own nature local without express  limitation of any place in local act where the concurrence of the obligor and  obligee be requisite the obligor shall have time during his life if not hasten  by request of the obligee but when the obligor may perform the act for the  benefit of the obligee in his absence the obligor ought to do it in convenient  time where the concurrence not of the obligee but of a stranger be requisite  the obligor shall not have time to do a local act during his life but he ought  to do it in convenient time but if the concurrence of a stranger and of the  obligee be requisite the obligee ought to hasten the performance of such local  act by request where the act which a obligor ought to do do not concern the  obligee nor benefit he but be to be do by the sole act of the obligor himself  and no time be limit for the performance the obligor have time during his life  and the performance can be hasten by request so also when the act to be do by  the condition be to be do by the sole act or labour or industry of a stranger  which in no manner concern the obligor or obligee or any other person and no  time be limit for the performance it be sufficient if the act be do in the  lifetime of he who ought to do it in debt upon a bind by Bothey against smith  which begin hill James rot the condition be that if the defendant deliver to  the plaintiff one obligation of the sum of ten pound wherein the plaintiff  stand bind with one t to the defendant for payment of five pound and also if  the defendant do acknowledge satisfaction of a judgement upon the say bind and  also deliver true note of all bill of charge as do concern the same that then  c the defendant plead in bar quod non fuer aligu bill misarum pro et concernen  sect prd and do not answer ad residuum creating pretend that he need not  inasmuch as they be collateral act and no time be limit when they shall be  perform and it be adjudge against the defendant for he ought to have perform  the residue of the condition in convenient time and that without any request  and the difference be take and agree when the act by the condition of a bind  to be perform to the obligee be of its nature a transitory act as payment of  money delivery of charter and the like and no time be limit although a place  be express there the act ought to be perform in coke report a er p convenient  time and when the act to be perform be of its own nature local without express  limitation of any plAcc but in such local act there be a difference for when  the concurrence of the obligor and the obligee be requisite there the obligor  shall have time to do it during his life if the obligee do not hasten it by  request but when the act be local and the obligor may perform it for the  benefit of the obligee in his absence there the obligor ought to do it in  convenient time in this case at bar there be example of both for first the  delivery of the bind be transitory and therefore the obligor ought to have  deliver it in convenient time although the acknowledgement of satisfaction be  local coke a yet it may be perform in the absence of the other party and  therefore in both those case the obligor ought to perform the act in  convenient time without any request but when the act be of its own nature  local and to be do to the obligee and to the performance thereof the  concurrence of the obligor and obligee be requisite there the obligor shall  have time to perform it during his life unless he be hasten by request as  before be say as if a man be bind in a bind to feoff the obligee of the manor  of d without limitation of any time there forasmuch as the estate ought to  pass by livery and seize so that there ought to be a concurrence of both party  touch   light a roll more cro Elizabeth   light b Hardr   light a b roll    light b cro Elizabeth hard Bridgm and the obligor can do it without the  obligee and it can be do but upon the land the obligor have time during his  life if the obligee do not hasten it by request make to the obligor for it be  not reasonable that the obligee may make request upon the land when he will  for then the obligor will be force to stay always upon the land which will be  inconvenient but in such case the obligee ought to make request to the obligor  and appoint a certain time when the feoff shall be make unto he but there be a  difference in such case between the concurrence of the obligor and a stranger  and of the obligor and obligee for if I be bind to you to feoff a stranger and  no time be limit although the concurrence of the obligor and the feoff be  requisite yet the obligor shall not have time to perform it during his life  but he ought to do it in convenient time for in such case the obligor have  take upon he to do it to a stranger and may do it without the concurrence of  the obligee but when the obligee himself be party and the act can be do  without his concurrence there it be reasonable that the obligor shall have  time during his life unless the obligee hasten it by his request for in such  case the obligor do not take upon he for the obligee who be party to the deed  as he do in the other case for the stranger but it be say if the concurrence  of a stranger and of the obligee be requisite in such case the obligee be a  party he ought to hasten it by request as if I be bind to you that S shall  feoff you without limitation of any time I S shall have time during his life  unless you hasten it by request also it be resolve that when the act which the  obligor by the condition ought to do do not in any manner concern the obligee  nor his benefit but be to be do by the sole act or labour of the obligor  himself and no time be limit in the condition in which it shall be perform  there the obligor have time during his life and the performance thereof can be  hasten by request as if I be bind to you that I will go to Rome or Jerusalem c  in the same case and all such coke b case the obligor have any time during his  life to do it so when the act to be do by the condition be to be do by the  sole act or labour or industry of a stranger which in no manner concern the  obligor obligee or any other person and no time be limit when it shall be do  it be sufficient to the obligor if the act be do in his lifetime who ought to  do it as if I be bind to you upon condition that I S shall go to Rome or  Jerusalem c or that such a student in divinity in the university of Cambridge  shall preach at saint Paul cross or such a student of the law in the Inner  temple shall argue a matter in law in westminsterhall in these and the like  case no time be limit they have time to do it during their life e b hob e a b    light b a   b roll   b Bulst   light a roll Rep dyer I it b more   light b    light a and the performance thereof can be hasten by coke report a er p  request and by these difference and reason you will better understand your  book which prima fancy seem to disagree videlicet h hilarys case e e sir James  harrington case e e light fol h mark dyer Elizabeth Andrew case and Elizabeth  e h see the difference where the duty be Payable on demand c and where it be  no duty till demand c Mod note to former edition