case the attorneygeneral against LANDERFIELD in chancery Michaelmas term Geo  see in re Thompson settlement trust Ch a devise his real and personal estate  to saint Bartholomew hospital and it be doubt whether this devise be within  the statute of mortmain the governor of the hospital and next of kin come to a  agreement that onefourth shall be pay to the next of kin the other  threefourths to the hospital and this agreement carry into execution a by will  devise all his estate both real and personal to the hospital of saint  Bartholomew c and it be a question whether this devise be within the late  statute of mortmain the governor of the hospital c and the next of kin come to  a agreement that all the estate both real and personal shall be sell and  divide into four part one of which be to be for the next of kin and the other  three to be pay to the use of the say corporation the leasehold be four  hundred pound ayear and the personal four thousand five hundred pound after  debt pay this agreement come now to be establish in chancery but it not appear  what proportion the leasehold and personal estate bear to the real the court  be unwilling to decree until the master shall report whether this agreement be  for the benefit of the charity for by the write it appear to be a proposal  only and no agreement if the latter the agreement of so great a corporation  will have great weight with I but these corporation be only trustee for the  several charity and can alienate the land or estate give to those use and  these estate be distinct from those which they be seize of as mayor c of  London modern report er p note this agreement be afterward establish by a  decree note in this case the attorneygeneral argue that as corporation can not  be seize to a use at law no more can they be trustee but shall have the land  to their own use divest and free from the trust   Cheedlieghs case modern  report but the chancellor will not let he go on nothing be clear than that  corporation may be trustee