bodens v Lord Galway that Dec bequest of personal estate to a during his life  and if he have no heir then over hold the bequest over be void as be too  remote SC Amb good bodens by her will bear date the that of April after give  several legacy and annuity give the residue of her estate to the plaintiff  George bodens in manner follow videlicet her house and all her effect to be  sell and lie out in the fund for the plaintiff after all the legacy be pay  during his life and if he have no heir to his sister mrs jane Watson the cause  come on at the roll on the that of may Amb nom Boden v Watson when his honour  direct a general account but decline give any opinion as to what interest the  plaintiff take in the personal estate it now come on for further direction Mr  serjeant Whittaker Mr York and Mr Crofts for the plaintiff the  solicitorgeneral Mr ambler and Mr Bicknell for the defendant contend that the  court will construe the word have in the same way as the word have be construe  in target v gaunt p W and other similar case by which mean the devise over  will be good in case the plaintiff have no issue at his death it be also urge  that this be a contingent devise to the child of the plaintiff if he shall  have any to they if not to the defendant Eden the Lord chancellor I have lie  it down as a principle that in all question of this nature the whole will must  be take together and a judgement form from thence of the testator intention be  I to determine this limitation over to be good I shall destroy the principal  intention of the testatrix which be that George bodens and his issue shall  take before mrs Watson I can imply a gift to the issue as purchaser for such a  implication must be necessary which be not the case here the word heir must  mean heir of the body and the testatrix certain intend that not only George  bodens but also his issue shall take preferable to mrs Watson and that can  only be by transmissibility for they can take as purchaser it be the same as  if it have be give to he for life and to the heir of his body and if no such  heir then over the failure of issue be general and I can find nothing to  confine it to a particular time I must therefore decree the residue of the  money to be pay to the plaintiff Reg lib a fol note the case upon the subject  of limitation over of personal property which be too numerous to bear citation  be collect in bridge Eden er p man digest to these may be add spring v Jeffere  Cox do v Ellis east Barlow v salt Ves lion v Mitchell mad Rep and the report  of Tothill v Pitt subjoin to it brounker v Bagot Meriv Donn v penny ib SC Ves  Elton v eason Ves Britton v twine Meriv Kinch v ware S and S the case upon  this point comprise in the present publication be Salkeld v Vernon Eden grey v  Shawne ib tailor v clarke Eden grey v Montagu ib Howston v Ives ib destouches  v walker ib