ccxlv gomersall and GOMERSALLS case in a account the plaintiff charge the  defendant as bailiff of his shop spear to have administration will do you much  good the defendant answer to the good only and say nothing to the shop  Tanfield Leonard move the same matter for error in arrest of judgement as h  one charge another as bailiff of his house et spear habeas will do you much  good in eastern existen the traverse be that he be not bailiff of the house  pro ut that be good and go to all but be can answer to the good and say  nothing to the house see e Br account a man bring a account against one as  bailiff of his manor to have spear of twenty ox and cow and certain quarter of  corn and by Belknap if he have the manor and no good yet he shall account for  the manor and it shall be no plea to say that the plaintiff sell he the good  without traverse without that that he be his bailiff to account render and as  to the manor be may say that the plaintiff lease the same to himself for year  without that that he be his bailiff another exception be take by he that the  plaintiff charge he with money ad merchandizandum and he traverse that he be  not his receivor denarior ad to sum up pro ut and so be do not meet with the  plaintiff and so it be no issue and it be not help by the statute of jeofails  h but misjoining of issue be help by that statute Elizabeth W a attorney of  the common plea do charge another attorney of the same court with a covenant  to have three year board in marriage with the defendant daughter and he plead  that he do not promise two year board and so issue be join and try and the  same can not be help by the statute because it be no issue and do not meet  with the plaintiff so if one charge in the debet to hold off and be answer to  the to hold off only it be no issue and therefore it be not help by the  statute in h in trespass for enter into his house and take of his good the  defendant plead non to go into and the issue be try and damage give and  because the take of the good be not also in issue all be void e one shall not  account by parcel because the action be entire see e and book of entry a  precedent h that the verdict be not full and do not go to the whole and  therefore be void Hele sergeant contrary and as to the first point be say that  there be a case in e account where the plaintiff charge the defendant in  account as bailiff of his house and that he have the administration of his  good videlicet forty sack of wool and upon issue join the jury find that he be  not bailiff of his house but they far find that he have receive the forty sack  of wool to render account of the same and the plaintiff in that case have  judgement for the sack of wool although there be no verdict find for the house  see h where if a jury be charge with several issue and the one of the issue be  find and the other not that the same make no discontinuance or if one of the  issue be discontinue yet it be no discontinuance as to the whole but admit the  same be not help by the commonlaw yet be say it be help by the statute of of  jeofails which be non obste discontinuance or miscontinuance Daniel to the  same purpose and he say that the book before cite of h and e be not rule nor  the case there adjudge in the one book the defendant plead that the plaintiff  give the good unto he and in the other book Leonard er p that he sell the say  good unto he and demand judgement of the action and he say that it be no good  answer for they be plead only before the auditor and not in a action upon  account and far he say that although the verdict be find but for part yet it  be good for no damage be to be recover in a account in trespass it be true if  one issue be find and not the other and jointdamages be give the verdict be  not good for any part but if several damage be give then it be good as it be  rule in h coke h be that the plaintiff can declare general of a house spear to  have administration Leonard will do you much good but he must far say twenty  quarter of corn or the like c in the principal case it be a jointcharge and  but one for the shop and good and he answer unto one only but he ought to  answer to all or else it be no answer at all but coke find out another thing  videlicet that there be a thing put in issue which be not in the verdict nor  find nor touch in the verdict and that be the verdict of all which be find not  to be good and it be not help by the statute of h of jeofails I rant that  discontinuances be help by the statute of h but imperfect verdict be not help  thereby it be a great case argue in the exchequer Chamber and it be branch  case a information be against branch for enter into a house and a hundred acre  of land in Stepney he plead not guilty the jury find he guilty for the hundred  acre but say nothing as to the house upon which a writ of error be bring and  judgement be reverse and he say it be not a discontinuance but no verdict for  part Daniel that be the default of the clerk who do not enter it and it have  be the usage to amend the default do by the clerk in another term all the  justice say that be true if the postea be bring in and not enter but here it  be enter in the roll in this form Daniel where I charge one in account with so  much by the hand of such a one and so much by the hand of such a one although  there be but one without hoc to they all yet they be as several issue the  court answer not so unless there be several issue join to every one of they  but by gawdy justice if there be several issue and the one be find and the  other not no judgement shall be give Clench justice in the principal case it  be not a charge of the good but in respect of the shop therefore that ought to  be traverse shoot justice the traverse of the shop alone be not good Egerton  the queen solicitor say that the book may be reconcile and that there need not  a traverse to the good for the traverse of the shop prout be a answer to all  but now he take issue upon the good only which issue be not warrant by he  declaration and he say that if one charge I as bailiff of his good ad  merchandizandum I shall answer for the increase and shall be punish for my  negligence but if he charge I as his receiver ad to sum up I shall not be  answerable but for the bare money or thing which be deliver Vid