case thompson versus town refer to in re Lawley Zaiser v Lawley Ch Julii pre  Ch Eq can ab pl Eq can ab pl S c where a man have a power to dispose of money  by his will this be asset and liable to his debt I S on sale of land take a  bind from the purchaser to pay any sum or sum of money not exceed as he shall  by will appoint and I S by will distribute it and appoint payment of it to  several of his relation the bill be bring by creditor of I S for satisfaction  out of asset and inter alian to have the pound apply towards payment of their  debt per cur I S have power to dispose the pound must be look upon as part of  his estate and decree it to be asset liable to the plaintiff debt the cause  come on the that Nov precede and it then appear that the defendant testator  William Thompson be indebt to the plaintiff in the sum of pound secure by bind  date in Jan and another sum of pound S d and be a single person and mind to  continue his manor of Boothby in the county of Lincoln in his name and family  and have a kindness for the plaintiff his relation do about Oct by deed and  fine settle the manor of Boothby and other land in the county of Lincoln which  it appear be of the yearly value of pound subject to a annuity of pound during  the life of one mrs bowl to the use of himself the settlor for life remainder  to the plaintiff and his heir and that in consideration thereof the plaintiff  do about the that Nov give the say William Thompson a bind in pound penalty in  trust to pay such legacy and sum of money as the say William Thompson shall by  his last will give away and dispose of so as the same do not exceed the sum of  pound and the bill be bring by Anthony Thompson only for a account of the  asset of William Thompson and that the say bind for pound may be subject to  the plain tiffs aforesaid demand a issue be direct to try whether the say bind  of pound be agree between the plaintiff and the defendant testator to be  discharge or sink on the make of the settlement on the plaintiff or not Reg  lib b fol on this issue a verdict be obtain for the plaintiff that the say  bind of be not agree between the plaintiff and the defendant testator to be  discharge or sink on make the say settlement on the plaintiff and thereupon  this cause come on this day again on the equity reserve the decree declare  that the say pound be asset of the testator liable to the satisfaction of the  debt due to the plaintiff and that the plaintiff ought to retain the same out  of the say pound Reg lib b fol and affirm on appeal in dom proc that march  jour Ho lord vol p so Lassells v Lord Cornwallis post pre Chan SC Hinton v toy  all atk Bainton v ware atk Lord Townshend v Windham Ves l and see Buckland v  Barton h black Grise v Goodwin Freem and Holmes v Coghill Ves so where power  to charge on land by deed or will and execute by deed pack all v Bathurst atk  Troughton v Troughton ibidem Vernon chancery case de term S michaelis in  curian porter