case man versus western April Eq can ab pl S c a indebt by specialty and also  on simple contract pay several sum and enter they in his book as pay on  account of what be due by specialty this entry not sufficient to make the  application defendant be indebt to the plaintiff on specialty videlicet on  article under hand seal and also on simple contract on a run account make  several payment Vernon chancery case er p of sum in gross and enter they in  his own book as pay upon account of what be due upon article question be  whether these sum shall be apply towards satisfaction of what be due on the  article which carry interest or in satisfaction of the debt by simple contract  Vernon chancery case per Lord chancellor although the rule of law be that  whoever to loosen to loosen secundum manner to loosen yet that be to be  understand when at the time of payment he that pay the money declare upon what  account he pay it but if the payment be general the application be in the  party who receive the money and the entry in the defendant book be not  sufficient to make the application by the decree in the register book the  defendant book of account be state to have be read the plaintiff be a iron  manufacturer and the defendant a ironmonger and the debt arise upon two  different set of article or contract for iron hoop to be make by the plaintiff  for the defendant the first without and the second with interest and the  principle of the position state in the print report be uphold by the decree by  which it be refer to the master to take account between the party and on the  take such account the say master be to see what be due to the plaintiff on the  slit account be the first contract on the first of may when the say pound be  pay which pound the defendant by his answer start he have enter in his book he  have keep a particular account as pay to the second account and in case so  much be due on such slit account the same be to be apply in discharge of but  if there be not so much as the say pound then due on the say slit account then  only so much as shall appear to be then due be to be apply in discharge  thereof and the residue of the say pound be to go and be apply in discharge of  the money that become due on the second contract and it be further order and  decree that the other payment which have be make general by the defendant be  in the first place apply to satisfy what be due on the slit account be the  first contract at the respective time of such payment and then to satisfy what  be due on the second contract and particular the pound which by the receipt be  distinguish to go in discharge of the second contract be to be so apply Reg  lib b oh vide on this head Heyward v Lomax ante vol p and case cite in not  there Vernon chancery case de boundary paschae in curian porter