case leaves against bernard Trinity term will roll a plea which though  informal be in substance a demurrer be good S c post S c Mod the plaintiff  declare that in consideration he have pay to the defendant sixteen guinea he  promise to pay the plaintiff a hundred pound if no town in Flanders garrison  with two thousand man shall be take or surrender to the French king before the  first day of September and lie a indebitatus assumpsit for the hundred pound  upon a wager and another indebitatus for the hundred pound receive by the  defendant for the use of the plaintiff to which the defendant plead thus et  modus ad haec diem scilicet diem loveliness prox post crast saint the number  three thither eoden boundary usque who diem pillage Isaacus Bernard friends  are living Himself omnibus et in every way exception quoad billam pillage to  have freedom ad billam interloquend et tunc ad responden c in person dom ring  at Westminster when tam pillage Johannes leave per attorn suum pillage how  pillage Isaacus per Johan Bernard attorn suum et idem Isaacus defen vim et  injure when c et petit judgment de narration pillage because quoad chiefs  promise et assumption superius in narration that mentionat idem Isaacus to say  quod pillage Johannes leave valor pillage sexdecim peciarum ear wedge in per  Self Johan leave eiden Isaaco ut carry in front loosen supposit in narration  svan pillage in certainly to point out et allegar per law terrae holding et to  withhold unde ex quo pillage Johannes leave yes valor sexdecim peciarum ear  wedge in that superius non to point out seu allegavi idem Isaacus petit  judgment de narration pillage quoad chiefs promise et assumption pillage et  quod narratioilla in she part empty c et quoad secundum promise et adoption  pillage superius in narration Self Johannes leave mentionat idem Isaacus  similiter petit judgment de narration modern er p that because pillage  Johannes leave in narration svan pillage non to stretch out de well pro who  pledge in eaden promission et assumption superius express fact to be inter the  same Johan leave or Isaacum or as well in quo modus pillage Johannes leave  pignus ill de eoden Isaaco modern lucrasset prout per law terrae to stretch  out to withhold ita quod curian dom king hic that this only is apparent utrum  pignus pillage to be for sale seu illicit to be unde ex quo pillage Johannes  leave ill curiae dom king hic non to stretch out seu to point out idem Isaacus  petit judgment de narration pillage quoad pillage secundum promission et  assumption et quod narrative ill in she part empty c et quoad tertian promise  et adoption pillage superius in narration Self John leave mentionat idem  Isaacus similiter petit judgment de narration pillage because to say quod  centum librae in eaden tertian promission et assumption superius express are  eaedem centum librae in sencundam promission et assumption pillage superius in  narration Self John leave similiter mentionat et express et non all nor to  visit et hoc parat be verify unde ex quo pillage Johannes leave un et the same  containing ten each top in One et eaden action bis to strive for idem Isaacus  similiter petit judgment de narration pillage quoad tertian promission et  assumption et quod narr in she part similiter empty c it be object against  this form of plead that it be neither a demurrer nor a plea in bar and  therefore it must be a plea in abatement and so no judgement final can be give  but a to answer ouster first it can be a demurrer for that be where the party  will eastern no far because the other have not show sufficient matter against  he a t therefore he say that narrative minus be sufficient in lege to make he  give any answer thereunto whereupon he pray the judgement of the court if he  shall be compel to answer all which form be want in this plea second it can be  a plea in bar to the action for then he shall have plead that the plaintiff  act svan against the defendant to have non debet and conclude his plea thus  unde petit judgment si pillage the plaintiff act svan pillage ind versus the  defendant to have seu manutenere to withhold c three therefore it must be in  abatement and that be either to the writ or count if the action be bring by  original then the plea be petit judgment de short catalog and it must conclude  in the same word if it be to the declaration then it must be petit judgment de  billa et narration for billa and narrative be the same and in this form the  defendant have now plead modern the first time that such incertainty of plead  be introduce be in the twentysecond year of Charles the second where the  defendant begin his plea in bar action non c and conclude in abatement unde  pro diminution to put under narrative c petit judgment but all the other entry  be otherwise but the court be of opinion that the substantial part of a  demurrer be in this plea and therefore the defendant have judgement