case Kingdon versus bridge discuss soar v foster key I distinguish Batstone v  salt l r Eq eoden die in court Eq can ab pl pl a purchase a walk in a chase  and take the patent to himself and to his wife and I S during their life and  the life of the survivor the husband die indebt the wife decree the benefit of  the patent during her life though a have not leave asset to pay his debt but  after her death I S to be a trustee for the executor the case be that the  plaintiff late husband purchase a walk in a chase and take the patent thus to  wit to himself and his wife and one bridge for their life and the life of the  long liver of they Kingdon die and make the defendant his executor the  plaintiff bill be to have the benefit of this purchase and to have the patent  deliver to her the defendant by answer set forth that Kingdon die great indebt  and have not leave sufficient asset for payment thereof and submit it to the  court whether this purchase ought not to be liable to the payment of his debt  Vernon chancery case per cur it shall be presume to be intend as a advancement  and provision for the wife the wife can be a trustee for the husband and  therefore decree that the plaintiff shall enjoy the benefit of the patent  during her life and after her decease in case bridge shall survive her to be a  trust for the executor of the husband and apply towards the payment of his  debt the decree on the rehear d July be that the defendant bridge be a trustee  for the plaintiff for all the say lodge and walk and therefore that she ought  to hold and enjoy the same with all its right member perquisite and profit  during her life and that the say defendant shall deliver up the possession of  the say premise to the say plaintiff or her assign and shall account with the  plaintiff for the rend profit and perquisite thereof receive by he or raise or  make out of the same or that may have be receive or make without his wilful  default and in case the say defendant refuse so to do then the court will  consider of cost Reg lib a fol vide back v Andrews pre Ch post Christ hospital  v budgin ux post but in that case there be sufficient asset Watts v Thomas p  wms where husband purchase a term for himself and his wife and the survivor  and after mortgage it without his wife and then die indebt the equity of  redemption asset Vernon chancery case er p