case pyat versus Winfield at the chancellor house Lord chancellor eoden die  one coparcener join with her husband and sister in a letter of attorney to  sell the timber which be sell accord baron die the court deny the wife a  injunction because the letter of attorney be good in equity for the wife be  not impose on and be to have half the money and the other sister have a power  by law to cut down all the timber the court grant one tenant in common a  injunction to restrain the other from cut down the timber and refer it to a  master to see what timber be fit to be cut down and to sell it and to pay the  money to the party accord to their interest two coparceners one marry baron  and feme join with the other sister in a letter of attorney to a three person  to sell the timber on the estate which he dispose of accord mosely report er p  ingly the baron die and the feme bring this bill to restrain the purchaser and  her sister from cut down the timber and the Lord chancellor grant a injunction  nisi but allow the cause show by the defendant this day for though in law the  letter of attorney be determine it be good in equity and a injunction ought  not to be grant pure to deprive the purchaser of his bargain when one sister  have undoubted a power and the other know what she do and do not pretend she  be impose on and be to have half the money and his lordship say that since the  other sister have a power by law to cut down the timber he do not know how he  can restrain her but the plaintiff ought to make a partition and though this  case be different he declare himself not satisfy with the case of the earl of  Chesterfield and Mr viner which be quote by the council for the plaintiff the  earl of Chesterfield be entitle to one four and Mr viner to three four of a  estate Mr viner be for cut down some timber off the estate the earl be against  it and file a bill against Mr viner and Lord Cowper grant a injunction and  refer it to a master to see what timber be fit to be out down and to make a  sale thereof and the money be to be pay to the party accord to their interest  for both have a title by law and one be desirous to have the timber fall and  the other oppose it it become necessary for a court of equity to interpose