case skip versus Harwood August a commission of bankruptcy can supersede a  decree of this court for a receiver which be a discretionary power exercise by  this court with as great utility as any sort of authority that belong to they  and be provisional only and do not affect the right of party the plaintiff and  the defendant have be partner together in the brew trade several dispute have  arise between they and action among the rest a action in the court of common  plea and the partnership by the consent of both be dissolve in Mr skip  afterward bring his bill here for a account of what be due to he from the  partnership and on the that of June last there be a decree for a receiver to  collect in the partnership debt and that Mr Harwood shall not dispose of any  part of the dead stock a order that Harwood shall give security to pay what  shall be find due on the balance of the account and that the cause shall stand  over on the six of July there be a decree c the morning of the decree Mr  Harwood remove no less than butt of beer in a fraudulent collusive manner in  order to evade the decree he expect will be make in the cause for he be  present in court during the hear which last three day by a order of the  fifteen of July the court order that Harwood shall bring back all the stock  which he have remove upon or since the that of July on the that of July a  commission of bankruptcy issue against Harwood and he be find by the  commissioner to have commit a act of bankruptcy on the that of the same month  the assignee under the commission who be in possession of the good that be  clandestine convey away insist they have a right to detain they  notwithstanding the decree Mr skip have obtain and that he must now come in  acquire step with other creditor under the commission Lord chancellor a  judgement creditor to be sure have no preference under commission of  bankruptcy though execution have be take out if not actual execute but then a  commission of bankruptcy can supersede a decree of this court for a receiver  which be of a different consideration and be a discretionary power exercise by  this court with as great utility to the subject as any sort of authority that  belong to they and be provisional only for the more speedy get in of a party  estate atkins and secure it for the benefit of such person who shall appear to  be entitle and do not at all affect the right and therefore his lordship make  a order that the assignee and all other person who have take any of the effect  of Mr Harwood or note of hand to he for debt due to the partnership the word  since the pronounce the decree be not in the register book since t pronounce  the decree shall deliver they to the receiver as to what have be insist that  the decretal order be not actual pass and therefore Mr Harwood be not guilty  of a contempt his lordship say where a person as Mr Harwood have do attend a  cause to which he be a defendant the whole time of the hear and have notice of  the decree by be present when it be pronounce in court if he do any act that  be a contravention to the decree he be guilty of a contempt and punishable for  it notwithstanding the decretal order be not draw up and there be several  instance of this kind or otherwise it will be extreme easy to elude decree  some of which in their nature require a considerable length of time before  they can be complete draw up Lord Hardwicke commit Mr Harwood to the fleet for  his contempt of the order of the six and fifteen of July Reg lib b fol vide  anon atk pengree v Jonas bro Charles Rep atkins er p