butler against crouch the lord have let one hundred year pass without claim  his villain or his issue can after that seize they mean that one butler of the  county of Gloucester make a entry into certain land and tenement of W crouch  of the county of Somerset as into land purchase by his villain and thereof  make a lease for a term of year to his servant who enter and be eject by  crouch against who he bring a ejection firmtrqn in b r in the county of  Somerset and crouch plead not guilty and in this term a substantial jury of  the county of Somerset of EsqLuires and gentleman be charge upon this issue  and upon the evidence this doubt be raise that if there be grandfather father  and son and the grandfather be a villain regardant and the father depart out  of the manor and remain so without return to the manor for the space of sixty  year and die without any seizure by he or without do any villainservice and in  the foreign place have issue the son who also life there where his father die  for forty year and more and be there hold to be and repute a freeman without  any seizure of his body or any claim make by if the king be seize of a manor  and a intrude into a acre parcel thereof and build a house and afterward the  king alien the manor to b and a continue and die it seem to Plowden in his  query that by the intrusion and building he have not gain any estate in  possession hill e b r rot bury v Robert Goodrnaq owe Leon a intrude upon the  king the king grant it to b a continue in possession and die seize whether  that toll the entry of b and the better opinion be that it do not toll it for  the court give a day to coke who argue that the entry be toll to show cause  why judgement shall not be give against he m and Elizabeth b r it be agree  upon evidence that the lord may here grant over his interest without entry  upon the occupier but if he have enter and the other continue in possession it  be otherwise for then it be seize dyer a er p the lord dyer so that the writ  de native habendum fail by reason of the limitation by stat h c but quaere  this whether now he be seisable by the lord as villain or not and it be hold  by the opinion of the court there that he be not j and this in favour of  liberty yet quaere well thereof by sander chief baron and dyer chief justice  of the bench and afterward the verdict upon the issue above pass for crouch  against the plaintiff see more thereof e of the present queen between Fleyer  and crouch fol