BLOURS case b a layman induct into a benefice be deprive by sentence in the  ecclesiastical court but pen that suit a quare irnpedi be bring against he and  the bishop and judgement therein by default on which deceit for nonsummons be  bring by the bishop and b and to both be plead in bar the sentence of  deprWahon hold no plea and the former judgement vacate one blour be within the  age of year and a mere this case well argue e c b yelverton Rep and judgement  give as here by Anderson Rhodes periam and manwood dyer a er p layman have no  clerical order obtain the benefice of Worthin in the county aforesaid which be  distant from Westminster league S mile and for this cause of insufficiency one  Corbet prosecute against he a citation out of the queen court of delegate to  deprive he by sentence declaratory pen which suit one William bring a quake  impede against the ordinary S the bishop of Hereford and blour name he clerk  and recover by default at the grand distress and a writ award to the  metropolitan because the bishop of Hereford be a party command he to move  blour and to admit the clerk of William which be execute and one griffin admit  and institute accord and induct after which the bishop of h and blour bring a  writ of deceit in c b against William and the sheriff and the summoner for not  summon William and the summoner appear and not the sheriff and the summoner  several examine upon oath deny any sufficient summons on account of the  shortness of the time before the day of the return of the writ c respect be  have to the distance of the place and William plead in bar of the writ of  deceit this disability of blour and sentence of deprivation by sentence  declaratory give by doctor Gibbons and Hussee judge delegatory c suppose  thereby that he may not be restore to his former title and interest in the  church c whereupon the bishop and blour demurrer in law and note that this  plea be plead in bar as well against the bishop as against blour and therefore  be bad wherefore judgement be give that the first judgement shall be annul and  vacate and the plaintiff restore to all that they lose c for the incumbency be  not in question but the disturbance of the plaintiff in the quare hinder to  present to the church which be void by the supposal of the writ dyer and the  matter of the deprivation or removal of blour from the church be not in  question by this recovery in quaere hinder by the defendant by which suit the  plaintiff in this writ of deceit be damnified c and upon this judgement  William bring a writ of error Icon and for discontinuance the judgement be  reverse but not for any matter in law therefore note that he be not restore to  the incumbency again in the writ of deceit because he do not lose it by the  supposal of the writ of blare irnpedit which suppose the church to be void