Clifford against ASBLEY and other fine and nonclaim bar a trust George low the  father be indebt pound for profit of land which he receive by his will devise  that if his personal estate fall short that his own land in the county of  wilts Hereford and Lincoln shall be liable to make satisfaction there be a  decree against Georqe low the son for satisfaction out of the land and he be  dead a Subpna in the nature of a to know facias be bring against the defendant  as tenant and all the defendant but Asbley as tenant of the land to George low  plead inter alian that they be several purchaser for a valuable consideration  case in chancery er p by fine with proclamation after a decree and nonclaim  without notice and whether this be a good bar be the question and long debate  Lord keeper a fine with proclamation and nonclaim will bar a trust and so it  be resolve in the exchequer and a entry on the land by a beneficiary and trust  be no sufficient claim but it must be by Subpna but there be a decree which be  more than a trust and put case that a man have a judgement on debt at the  commonlaw on which he may have a elegit the defendant after judgement alien  the land by fine and proclamation and five year pass the plaintiff may have a  to know facias and elegit and why not so here I answer that in case of a  statute or judgement the case in chancery plaintiff or cognizee have no  interest in the land for if he release all his right to the land yet he may  sue execution on the land much be say on the other side touch the  inconveniency and ill consequence on the one hand how dangerous it will be for  purchaser and how much the statute of fine will be weaken on the other side  how decree will be weaken the Lord keeper take time to advice but Asbleys plea  be allow because as to the land videlicet Fisherton anger which he claim  George low party to the fine be but tenant in tail the remainder over to his  brother under who Asbley claim by fine without notice of the trust or decree