case newland vers collins in c b by the stat Geo c S it be enact that it shall  be lawful for all defendant in replevin to avoid or make conusance general  that the plaintiff in replevin or other tenant of the land and tenement  whereon the distress be make enjoy the same under a grant or demise at such a  certain rend during the time wherein the rend distrain for be incur and still  remain due or that the place where the distress be take be parcel of such  certain tenement hold of such honour lordship or manor c without further set  forth the grant tenure demise or title of landlord lessor or owner of such  manor pale yellow hist d Edward p the inducement to a traverse be insufficient  where the traverse be a thing immaterial vin Abr title traverse b pl Com dig  this be a action of replevin the defendant avow for that Thomas Collins his  father be seize in fee and be so seize on the that of may demise to the  plaintiff for twentyone year to commence after Michaelmas then next ensue at  the yearly rend of that Thomas Collins on the first of December die seize of  the reversion which descend to the defendant as his son and heir who for rend  arrear avow c the plaintiff in bar to the avowry say that Thomas Collins be  seize in tail without hoc quod to be seized in of his ut de fee to which the  defendant demurrer and show for cause that the traverse be a thing immaterial  and the inducement to the traverse insufficient and it be understand to be  agree that the plaintiff may traverse the title allege by the avowant though  he need not allege such title to maintain his avowry die cro Brownl S c a Yel  SC cro but then there ought to be a proper inducement to the traverse to show  that the matter contain in the traverse be material for though the inducement  to the traverse be not traversable general yet it ought to be such as if true  will defeat the title of the other party otherwise the traverse amount to a  negative pregnant hob and therefore in a prohibition where the plaintiff  suggest that the prior c be seize in fee and insist upon the unity of  possession time out of mind till the dissolution h ration pron  interrog  he  be discharge of tithe the defendant plead that by agreement make on the first  of may between the master of the hospital of Burton Legars and the prior that  tithe shall be pay in the handsof the tenant c without hoc that he be  discharge of tithe comens it be hold that the inducement to the traverse be  have for it do not show any title which the master of the hospital have to  make such a agreement and to the same purpose be the case cro car Jones S C a  dyer more pl S c b   cro and therefore here though Thomas Collins the father  be seize in tail only yet comens er p his lease may be good especial where the  son be the issue in tail have affirm it by his distress and avowry for the  rend