bulloigne against William gervase administrator bulloigne bring a action of  debt upon a obligation of l against William gervase administrator to I S and  the defendant plead that the intestate die outlaw and that the outlawry always  continue in force and upon this the plaintiff do demurrer general and it be  argue by attoe for the plaintiff for the plea be not good for this be a plea  only by way of argument that he shall not be charge for this debt because he  have not asset and in this case this outlawry ought to be give in evidence  upon nothing in his hand be plead and it ought not to be plead in bar for by  possibility the outlawry may be reverse and then the administrator shall be  charge if he have any good and he vouch a cage in this court Trin Elizabeth  rot worley against Bradwel and dame manner his wife administratrix to sir  Thomas manner and the feme plead outlawry in the intestate and the plaintiff  demurrer general and it be adjudge to be no plea and note that the record be  bring into the court and read accord Hitcham sergeant to the contrary the  record in manner case be not well plead for the defendant only show that a  capias ad to give satisfaction issue against the testator and do not show any  recovery or judgement against he and that be the reason of the judgement in  that case and the plaintiff here ought to have demurrer special as the case of  of Elizabeth for otherwise he shall not have advantage of this plea and the  plea be only evil for the manner for it be apparent that by the outlawry of  the testator all his good be forfeit and this be the reason of the book of e  it be a good plea in a action of debt to plead a outlawry in the plaintiff and  to demand judgement of the action and not judgement of the writ for the debt  be forfeit to the king by the outlawry Hobert Hutton and winch the precedent  show by attoe be not answer for though the winch er p plead of the outlawry be  without show of a recovery and judgement yet the outlawry be good till it be  reverse and Hutton say that in some case a executor or administrator have good  though the testator die outlaw as if the testator let for life render rend and  the rend be behind and after the testator be outlaw and die this shall not be  forfeit but his executor shall have the rend and if a man make a feoff upon  condition that the feoff pay l to the feoff and his heir or executor and the  feoff be outlaw and the feoff pay the money to his executor as he may well the  executor and not the king shall have that also if the testator be outlaw and  be devise his land to his executor to be sell these money shall not be forfeit  and they shall agree that the plea be not good notwithstanding the general  demurrer for be who will bar another by a argumentative plea his plea ought to  be infallible to all intent and purpose and so it be not here for the executor  and the administrator may be charge by the have of good though the testator be  outlaw and for that the plea of the defendant be not good in substance and the  general demurrer be good by Hobert and by he if we suffer this plea then the  defendant will keep the good and not reverse the outlawry nor yet satisfy the  king also if he have not good the defendant may plead plene to manage or  nothing in his band and give this outlawry in evidence see e h h by the  opinion of Prisot and also see the case in e a case to this purpose and also  note well that it be say concern the case of manner that a writ of error winch  be bring of that afterward and that the case remain till this day undetermined