case HOLDERSTAFFE against sander a attachment will not lie in the first  instance against a attorney for procure one to be turn out of quiet possession  S c post S c holt Hooper sergeant move for a attachment against a attorney and  some other who have get one in quiet possession turn out thus he get one to  come upon the land who assume the name of the tenant in possession and own  himself to be the man and get the common affidavit of service to he by the  borrow name as tenant in possession have deliver a declaration to he before  and thereupon get judgement against the casual ejector and turn the tenant who  be whole ignorant of all out of possession upon affidavit of this matter all  the accomplice be order to attend for though the court look upon it as a very  great offence they will not at first grant a attachment but say that it be in  a criminal matter if endeavour be use to serve they with the rule and they can  not be find upon affidavit of that matter they will grant a attachment without  require personal service Hooper sergeant then insist to have it part of the  rule that they shall not modern er p move for a injunction in chancery in the  mean time for that will hinder the further inquiry of this practice but the  court say they can not do that for that will be to send a injunction into  chancery but they say that when the court have a hank over a man and he come  for a favour to the court they often refuse to grant he that without he  consent not to go into chancery and that if after such consent he will go they  will send a attachment against he for a contempt and holt chief justice say  sure chancery will not grant a injunction in a criminal matter under  examination in this court and that if they do this court will break it and  protect any that will proceed in contempt of it and he say he think that copy  of these affidavit upon which the rule be make here and a oath of their be  true copy ought to be ground sufficient to stay the chancery from grant a  injunction