Bunbury ROLLFE v budder Feb devise of bind to a wife to her sole and separate  use it be her sole property as much as if it have be vest in trustee a man and  his wife after many year cohabitation part and live separate about the year  she be then above sixty year of age the wife be destitute of a place to live  in be at last receive by the defendant at his house at Dulwich after the  separation a son of they die and by his will devise a hundred pound bind to  his father and a hundred pound eastindia bind mark No to his mother who he  make executrix and her assign for ever to her sole and separate use the bind  devise to the father after the son death be pay the mother be indebt to the  defendant for lodging necessary c agree to let he have her eastindia bind and  that it shall be change for another in the defendant own name which be accord  do the mother die and now the husband exhibit his bill to have a account and  satisfaction for this hundred pound eastindia bind suggest she have elope and  that he be possess of the bind to which the defendant answer as above deny the  elopement or any indirect practice to draw away the wife but that she be force  to leave he upon the account of his cruelty to her but no proof be enter into  so it stand single upon the point whether under these circumstance she have  not such a separate property in the bind as that she can dispose of it and per  curian clear she be not only executrix but the bind be devise to her sole and  separate use which vest the interest in her in a court of equity as much as if  the son have vest it in trustee for her separate use and there Bunbury be many  instance where a court of equity have decree a husband to stand as a trustee  for the separate use of his wife lady Suffolk case who marry sergeant Maynard  sir Joseph herns wife Seymour v Dilkes Nov and they say it will have make no  alteration in this case if the plaintiff have take out administration to his  wife and so the bill be dismiss with cost