but a person entitle only to a estatetail in land shall not have the money  because of the remainder man chance vide will Rep and Eyre case will Rep  equity case abridge a be seize in fee of the manor of king intermarry with  defendant who have a portion of pound pound whereof be pay to a pound residue  thereof be agree by all the party to be lie out in land to be settle as the  manor of king have be settle videlicet on a for life remainder to the first c  son of that marriage in tail male remainder to a in fee and until such  purchase the be to be place out upon security and the interest thereof to be  pay to such person as shall be entitle to the rend and profit of the manor of  king a die leave issue of this marriage one son only who be entitle to the say  manor of king in tail remainder to himself in fee levy a fine thereof to the  use of himself in fee and then die without issue and intestate whereupon the  say manor descend to plaintiff she bring her bill to have the mortgage upon  which the pound have be place out assign to her the defendant a s widow insist  that she be entitle to the same as administratrix of her son and that this  pound be as yet in itself money ought by the statute of distribution to be  divide betwixt herself as the mother of the intestate and d his half sister  Lord Chan Macclesfield decree the security for the pound to be assign to  plaintiff but all the interest due at the death of the son to go to defendant  as his administratrix and the reporter say as he understand his lordship  though the son die in a break part of the half year this interest shall not be  take as a rend but shall be apportion and a proportion thereof go to his  administratrix but all the interest due since the son death be decree to  belong to the plaintiff the heir No cost on either side Trin Edward and lady  Elizabeth his wife and countess dowager of Warwick I bro p c equity case  abridge er p will Rep ibidem Lord Chan say if there have be so much as a  parole direction from the son for the payment of this pound to his mother he  shall have regard it be of opinion that it be in the election of the son to  have make this money or to have dispose of it as money but then he conceive  that the son must do something to determine such election which he have not do  in the present case and then in a court of equity the heir be ever prefer a to  a administrator as to the fine his lordship hold it to be immaterial for that  the son have as good a power before the fine to dispose of the manor of king  or of the pound in money against all but his issue as he have after the fine  and issue he never have but admit that the fine as it comprise the say manor  so it do also the trust of this pound it will make against the defendant  because by the deed of use the use of the fine be declare to be to the conusor  and his heir and consequent will entitle the plaintiff to this money ibidem a  see the case of Lingen and Sowray will Rep Prec in Chan and Vol Eq can Abr p  can