c anonymous asset keb content this case in keb be year previous to the stat  note that where a mortgagor in fee be bind in a bind and die and the heir sell  the equity of redemption it be hold saint that the equity of redemption since  the statute of fraud and perjury be asset if the mortgage be in fee and  forfeit the heir may at commonlaw plead riens par descent but as he will still  have a equity to redeem such right of redemption will be equitable asset folly  v Gower vern but if the mortgage of a feesimple estate be only for a term of  year however long the reversion in fee leave in the mortgagor will be legal  asset plunket v Penson atk a analogous rule apply to the mortgage of a term if  it include the whole term the right of redemption will be equitable asset if a  remainder of the term be leave in the mortgagor that if the interest be a  legal one may be reach at law case of sir Charles Cox creditor p wms but not  if it be a trust term Scott v Scholey east and it be to be observe that where  judgement be obtain against a heir who have a reversion in fee by descent such  judgement be with a to be remiss execution and the creditor can by a bill in  equity compel the heir to sell the reversion in fee before it come into  possession but must wait for the asset when to fall upon Fortrey v Fortrey  vern kinaston v clarke atk to a bondcreditor and dly that notwithstanding the  alienation yet the value shall be asset in the hand of the heir a court of  equity will hold the heir to be a trustee quoad the debt and so far the estate  equitable asset Shiphard v lutwidge Ves come all moi to be dit per sir f  winnington ill esteant de council en Le case notam and per Le stat car the  trust of a inheritance be asset by the express word of the statute and liable  to a debt by bind freeman c anonymous will new publication a man that have a  lease of a dean and chapter all expire except nine month devise all his  interest in the say lease to b and afterward recover renew the lease and  republish his will and the question be whether this new lease pass by the say  will and resolve that it do by virtue of the new publication and be like the  case of Brett and Rigden in blow p concern land purchase after the make of the  will which pass by the republication Barnes v crow Ves jun but as this appear  to have be a lease for year it be not quite clear that even republication be  necessary though have it be a lease for life the renewal will have be a  revocation Marwood v turner p wms Abney v miller atk cart v cart Ridgew in  James v dean Ves it be allow that a testator may so express his intention  respect a lease as to pass any renew interest in it exist at his death and the  word of the will at present under consideration seem to express that intention  in Stirling v Lydiard atk the testator devise all his leasehold estate and  Lord Hardwicke g ask whether if the testator have purchase a new lease that  will not have pass and if so why a new term in a lease shall not equal pass in  flatter v noton Ves it be say that it must always be a question of intention  and the Lord Hutchins cite a case where a man lie on his deathbed and be ask  where his will be point to a box and say it be in that box and hold this  amount to a new publication freeman er p weather a renewal of a term shall  pass by a devise or only the term which actual exist at the time of make the  will and in that case word very similar to the present be construe not to take  in a renew lease that however be not a college lease as to which though it may  not be strict accurate to speak of a tenant right of renewal see ante c p yet  the experimental ground hope of such renewal constitute a well understand  interest Randall v Russell Meriv and see Colegrave v Manby mad but at all  event the republication in the principal case make the devise good as to the  renew lease