case Hancock against field and other executor of crouch Hilary term James Ro a  release of all action duty and demand make by a lessor to a lessee will not  discharge a subsequent breach of covenant to leave the premise in good repair  post roll ab   dyer bro lev   light cro Elizabeth Bac Abr ld raym Cowp dougl  term Rep   light b   post cro Elizabeth roll Abr side Yelv Mod Mod lev show  Bac Abr in covenant if the breach be assign accord to the covenant it be  sufficient covenant for that the plaintiff by indenture let to the testator a  house in fleet street for year and the lessee covenant to repair it well from  time to time during the term and at the end of the term to leave the same well  repair to the lessor and assign the breach for that he do not leave it well  repair at the end of the term the defendant plead that the plaintiff within  three day after the date of the indenture release to the testator all debt  duty and demand the truth be that the plaintiff have recover six pound damage  and cost against the testator and make a acquittance upon receipt thereof with  a general release of all action duty and demand which be plead in bar be enter  in haec word whereupon it be demurrer and after argument at the bar all the  court resolve that it be not any bar for be a covenant future and not in  demand at the time of the release make but to be perform at the end of the  lease this release although it be of all demand which be the most general word  in release yet there appear not any intent to release it can therefore be  alley bar but if he have release all covenant in such a indenture that have be  a bar and although a release of all demand be good to extinguish warranty  though future and to bar demand of relief croak throw as Edward pl be yet that  be because in the croak James er p one case the land be bind by the warranty  and the relief be by the reason of the signiory whereto it belong so it be a  good bar so it shall extinguish a rend reserve upon a lease although it be  make before any rend arrear because it be due by the contract which be before  the release make but the covenant here be mere future and be not break nor to  be sue before the end of the term and a release of action be not any bar  thereto as long quint Edward be and by consequence a release of demand be not  any bar Tanfield cite a case of one b in Elizabeth to be adjudge accord and  for that purpose the case of hoe v martial a be vouch where one become bail  and before judgement the plaintiff release to the bail all action and demand  and afterward the principal be condemned and do not render his body and in a  to know facias upon this recognizance the release be plead and adjudge to be  no bar because at the time of the release there be not any recognizance in any  sum nor be there any duty due so here c all the court be of that opinion a  exception be take to the declaration because the breach be assign in not  deliver up the house well repair at the end of the term and he do not show in  what point it be not well repair say non allocatur for the breach be accord to  the covenant be sufficient but if the defendant have plead that at the end of  the term he deliver it up well repair then if the plaintiff will assign any  breach he ought particular to show in what point it be not repair so as the  defendant may give particular answer thereto and William justice say it be so  resolve in the case of boil v Saxye that in a declaration in a action of  covenant it suffice to assign the breach as general as the covenant S  wherefore it be adjudge for the plaintiff