case a case out OF the court OF ware a conveyance by one of two jointtenants  in tail to the use of himself and his wife and the advancement of his son be  not within the statute of Henry of will fide car c see might case   b   a      light Inst burr Bl Rep and Mr hargrave note   light b upon the eleven of may  this term all the justice and baron be assemble the chief baron propound a  case depend in the court of ware videlicet two jointtenants to they and their  heir the one of they make a conveyance to the use of himself and his wife for  a jointure and the advancement of his son whether this be a assurance within  the statute of Henry c and Henry c so as the king shall have the three part  croak car sir Randolph grow the chief justice and the chief baron be divide in  their opinion from the other justice and baron in this point who all upon that  sudden motion conceive it to be out of the statute for the word be if any sole  seize or joint with other c there in such case the statute provide that the  king shall have the three part upon such conveyance but where two be joint  seize to they and their heir and the one make a conveyance this be out of the  word of the statute of Henry c and therefore ought not to be within the intent  of Henry c for that be a statute of explanation and shall be construe only  accord to the word and not with any equity or intendment for there can be a  explanation upon a explanation as it be hold in butler v baker a and Jones  justice say it be so resolve in the court of ware by the opinion of the chief  justice in the fortythird year of queen Elizabeth case memorandum a to know  facias must issue from the court where the judgement be give and queen what  process shall be against a administrator in England to a intestate in Wales  against who judgement in debt have be give at the grand session for the record  can be remove by certiorari sand Mod Vaugh Bulst lev Com dig Bac Abr term Rep  term Rep at the same time another question be move among they where judgement  be a   croak car er p give in debt at the grand session in Wales against a  defendant inhabit in one of those county and the defendant die intestate and  one who inhabit in London take letter of administration whether any execution  may be in Wales because he neither inhabit nor have any thing there and if not  then whether that record may be remove into the chancery by certiorari and  send by mittimus into the king bench or common plea to the intent to take  forth a to know facias upon it to have land out of Wales or good in the hand  of the administrator liable to it there and all the justice and baron conceive  and nemy for he may not have a to know facias in any court but where the  judgement be give and if such course shall be use all judgement in the court  in London or in inferior corporation will be remove and execute here which  will be a great inconvenience to the subject to make land or person liable to  such judgement in other manner than they be at the time of the judgement  wherefore there be no remedy but to execute such judgement in their peculiar  jurisdiction