a devise pound to m pound to b and pound to c all infant Payable at twentyone  and if any of they die before twentyone his share equity case abridge to go to  the survivor b die in testator lifetime and the question be if this be a lapse  legacy king c a legacy can never be lapse where it can take effect accord to  the will if land be devise to a for life remainder to b though a die in the  lifetime of the testator yet b shall take and so decree the legacy shall go to  the other legatee refer to vern June Willing and baine ms Rep quaere if the  legacy shall carry interest from the time of the testator death ibidem will  Rep Trin SC state it thus I S devise pound apiece to his child Payable at  their respective age of twentyone and if any of they die before their age of  twentyone then the legacy give to the person so dry to go over to the survive  child I S devise the residue of his personal estate to a b and c be three of  his child and have make they executor die one of the child die in the testator  lifetime and after the testator death one of the executor and residuary  legatee die upon this two question arise first whether the legacy of the child  that die in the life of the testator shall go to the survive child or shall be  a lapse legacy and sink into the surplus second whether when one of the  executor and residuary legatee die his share of the residuum belong to his  executor or to the survive residuary legatee resolve per cur that the rule be  that where the legatee die in the lifetime of the testator his legacy lapse I  e it lapse as to the legatee so die but that in this case the legacy be well  give over to the survive child as to the second point it be hold per cur that  there may be a joint legacy as well as a joint grant and that as the executor  equity case abridge er p ship survive there be the same reason why the devise  of the residuum shall do so too wherefore it be decree b that the survive  devisees of the residuum shall have the benefit of such surplus except as to  what have be receive and divide ibidem b see the case of Webster and Webster  but more particular that of Cray and Willis both in will Rep and and sir  Joseph jekyll argument on this point