case DUNCALF v BLAKEA February the that a insurer by his bill suggest the ship  be lose fraudulent and in the charge part mention that instead of proper good  there be only wool on board and in the interrogatory part pray defendant may  set out what kind of good he have on board defendant plead several statute  that make it penal to export wool in bar to a discovery of all kind of good on  board the plaintiff subscribe a policy of insurance for a considerable sum of  money the ship be lose and as suggest fraudulent and with a view of charge the  plaintiff with the policy the bill set forth that the ship instead of have  proper mercantile good on board be bind from one of the port of Ireland to one  of the port in France have only wool on board by the interrogatory part of the  bill it be pray that the defendant may set out what kind of good he have on  board what the invoice be in what manner the ship be clear and whether she  have not arm on board her atkins the defendant as to so much of the bill as  seek a discovery of the particular nature and quality of the good mention to  be ship on board the say ship to be send to France and what quantity plead a  act of parliament of I will mark that no wool shall be ship from Ireland or  import from thence to any port but Liverpool and some other in England which  be afterward make perpetual by the will mark and by another act make the W it  be enact that none shall direct or indirect export from Ireland into any  foreign dominion any wool and all offender against this act be make liable to  the forfeiture of the say wool and also to a forfeiture of pound for every  offence that the value of the cargo on board the say ship and insure by  plaintiff be by the policy ascertain at pound by the sum insure thereon and  therefore it can no way concern the plaintiff to know the particular of the  good but the discovery thereof may occasion several forfeiture and the bill  charge that the good ship on board c by the defendant be to be send to  Pontraffe in France which by the law and statute of this realm be prohibit and  high penal and the discovery manifest tend to draw in the defendant to accuse  himself he submit whether he shall be compel to make any other answer the  attorney general for the plaintiff admit that in the charge part of the bill  nothing be mention to be on board but wool but by the interrogatory part  defendant be ask in general what kind of good he have on board and defendant  plea go in bar to a discovery of all kind of good which be on board Lord  chancellor allow the plea see Harrison v Southcote post and the case cite  there in note under page but agree if other kind of good have be mention in  the charge part the defendant may have be oblige perhaps to have atkins er p  give some answer to it but as there be not defendant be not oblige to answer  that interrogatory part the only doubt he have be as to the clear of the ship  and have arm on board and that part of the bill he think afterward may be  cover with the plea agree in this case that a plea may be bad in part and yet  not so in the whole earl of Suffolk v green post Harrison v Southcote post  earl of Derby v duke of Athol Ves east India company v Campbell ibidem finch v  finch Ves bishop of sodor and man v earl of Derby ibidem