case Verney against Verney in chancery April tenant for life of a estate hold  for three life one of the life drop tenant for life must contribute to the  renewal but where such tenant for life be one of the person on who life the  lease be hold he shall not contribute to expense of add another life if one  drop lib Reg b foe S c Ves sen Mr Verney the late master of the roll devise a  leasehold estate which be hold of the dean and chapter of Westminster on three  life in trust for his wife for life remainder to his son in tail c one of the  life be drop the son petition that ambler er p mrs Verney may fill up the life  this be amicable do in order to take the sense of the court upon the occasion  Lord Hardwicke c after argument at bar these kind of estate be look upon by  testator as continue estate and be devise as such with remainder over  therefore the intention be that they shall be keep fill up from time to time  the question be at who expense where such a legal estate be devise to one for  life with remainder over and the tenant for life be one of the nominal person  upon who life the lease be hold there be no reason he shall be at any expense  in add another life because he can have benefit from it for the lease in be be  at least as durable as his interest the money therefore pay by he for renewal  shall be a charge on the estate Adderley v Clavering Cox bro c c so where it  be give in trust in the same manner and the beneficiary and trust be one of  the life name in the lease this court will not compel the trustee to surrender  that lease in order for a renewal at the expense of the beneficiary and trust  for life the present be the case of a trust where the beneficiary and trust  for life be not one of the life name in the lease but she have a chance of  have benefit from the renewal and the son who have the remainder in tail have  no more than a chance of benefit therefore it be but reasonable that she shall  contribute to the expense of obtain such renewal query in what proportion the  rule of the court be that the tenant for life shall pay onethird of the charge  or keep down the interest and that seem reasonable in this case the counsel  for mrs Verney acquiesce and agree to pay onethird of the expense note it be  order that mrs Verney do pay onethird part of the fine and charge and that the  other twothirds thereof be pay by I Verney the first tenant in tail lr this  rule of contribution do not now prevail but the tenant for life and  remainderman several contribute in proportion to the actual benefit which they  respective derive under the renewal Nightengale v Lawson bro stone v reed bro  white v white Ves Allan v backhouse v b