case Holditch versus miss Lord chancellor Parker one of the late director of  the SouthSea company owe money which be recover against he at law though all  his estate be take from he by the late act and provision man de for his  creditor yet the court deny a injunction the plaintiff have be one of the late  director of the SouthSea company be sue at law for pound he have take that sum  of the defendant for pound SouthSea stock which he have as he affirm put into  the subscription book in the name of one mrs peck whereas upon search in all  the book it do not appear that there be any sum whatsoever set down in the  name of peck upon whichthe defendant mistress bring a action against the  plaintiff as for so much money receive for the defendant use and obtain a  verdict the defendant at law now bring his bill and move for a injunction urge  that in regard the late act Geo c have vest all his estate in the trustee for  the SouthSea company and make a provision for the payment of his debt be late  a director out of his estate the defendant mistress ought to repair to the  trustee that it will be extreme hard to permit the plaintiff at law to take  out execution against the body of his debtor when the legislature have disable  he from pay peer William any of his debt and provide another method for that  purpose and that it be like the case of a bankrupt where the court have not  only grant a injunction but also release the bankrupt who after have give up  all his estate and submit to be examine have yet be arrest by a peevish  creditor vide ex part James ante but the Lord chancellor refuse to grant a  injunction say there be nothing of this act of parliament disclose in the  plead or if there be yet that the act be not make in favour of the late  director however afterward by consent the present trustee of the SouthSea  company pay the debt in question out of the allowance make by the act to the  plaintiff Holditch I vide Hornby v Houlditch cite in Ludford v barber t r and  Auriol v mill h Bl and t r the case of Holditch v mistress have also be peer  William er p apply in argument to those which have late arise respect American  loyalist sue in this country by American creditor kempe v Antill bro Ch c h  wright v nut h and bro c c folliot v Ogden h Bl and t r in wright v Simpson  Ves Lord Eldon recognize the authority of the principal case and express doubt  as to the soundness of the decision in wright v nut