case brown against Wootton Hilary term James roll see Brinsmead v Harrison lr  c p judgement recover in trover may be plead in bar to a second action against  a different person for the same cause without aver satisfaction post SC Yelv  SC more car   burr strange term Rep trover of certain plate the defendant  plead that at another time the plaintiff have bring his action for this same  plate against I S suppose the conversion to a roll ab   b dyer Leon cro  Elizabeth side Mod sheep touch b post hob roll ab Carth lie salk c roll Abr    light lev Com dig Bac Abr term Rep term Rep croak James er p have be by croak  throw he and in that action have judgement to recover twenty pound for damage  and have I S in execution for those damage and aver that it be for the same  good and for the same trover and conversion it be thereupon demurrer clerk for  the plaintiff argue that it be not any plea because the have judgement and the  party be in execution be not any satisfaction unless the money be pay and  therefore by be plead without satisfaction it be not any plea in bar of this  action as in debt against two by several praecipes upon one obligation  judgement and execution against one be no plea for the other without  satisfaction and execution of the body be not any satisfaction as Henry pl  Henry Henry title execute Henry but all the court hold the plea to be good for  the cause of action be against diverse for which damage uncertain be  recoverable and the plaintiff have judgement against one person for damage  certain that which be uncertain before be reduce in remember judge and to  certainty which take away the action against the other and therefore Popham  say if one have judgement to recover in trespass against one and damage be  certain although he be not satisfy yet he shall not have a new action for this  trespass by the same reason e contra if one have cause of action against two  and obtain judgement against one he shall not have remedy against the other  and the allege that he have the one in execution for this cause be not a  answer to the purpose and the difference betwixt this case and the case of  debt upon a obligation against two be because there every of they be  Chargeable and liable to the entire debt and therefore a recovery against one  be no bar against the other until satisfaction Fenner say that in case of  trespass after the judgement give the property of the good be change so as he  may not seize they again wherefore by all the court nullo to speak against not  any of the defendant counsel be there it be adjudge for the defendant