Barham against Hayman in attaint after entry on the lessee at will he continue  possession whether the lessors accept future rend waive the seize and he shall  still be tenant by sufferance at in attain the jury may give a special verdict  east James a b it be agree by four judge that where the predecessor of the  bishop of Gloucester nude a voidable lease and the present bishop command his  bailiff to receive his rend and he pay it over to the bishop the lease be now  make good the case be between the bishop of Gloucester and Dandy note the  execution or Harper Rep Elizabeth this case be report whereby it appear that  in a action of trespass by lessee against lessor for take corn the defendant  plead not guilty and the jury find against the lessor upon which the lessor  bring attaint and it be adjudge that the juror have give a false oath for  after the discharge of the lessee he be a seize and when the disseizee enter  he have the corn sever and the acceptance of the rend do not aid in this case  by dyer for no rend be to be pay Turners Rep rule that he may take away the  emboliments for by his continuance c east James between mullineux and Malevers  Danvers ab pl upon evidence to the jury it be agree if the seize pay the rend  the seize be purge and it make he tenant at will and it be so agree in Egerton  the Lord chancellor case who bring assize against sir Edward kinaston who  before have pay he the rend and it be adjudge against the chancellor as rob  Godfrey of counsel in the case tell I and so it be adjudge in skipwith case  and a father tenant at will die his son enter and pay the rend this purge the  seize Elizabeth Norfolk assize by sergeant Anderson that if a man lease at  will and discharge the lessee this be a determination of the will Orig stir  without any actual entry and the lessee continue he be a tenant upon  sufferance and not a seize Ulster if the lessor have enter or his servant by  his command one be tenant at will and sufferance of certain land for which he  have pay rend continual and be discharge by his lord and a entry make upon he  by the servant of the lord and by his command and notwithstanding this he  continue the occupation of the land and sow they and afterward pay the  accustom rend at the day of payment S at the Feast of the annunciation and  afterward in harvest he sever the emblements and make they in shock upon the  same land and the owner of the land command his bailiff to take and carry away  the corn and he do so in who the property of the corn be at dyer b er p the  time of the take be the issue between the farmer at sufferance and the lord  and the court think that if the seize sow the land and sever it and leave it  lie upon the land and the disseizee command his servant to take it away that  the disseizee shall have it as his own for immediate by the entry it be remit  to the master and no other entry be necessary but it seem to some that the  continuance of the tenant at sufferance above and the acceptance of the rend  at the day prove that the owner never take it for a seize but by the advice of  the court the jury find all the special matter above except that they say that  notwithstanding the say entry and discharge the tenant at sufferance continue  his occupation as above and pay the rend to one who be reeve of the manor of  Yalding which rend indeed be in gross among other rend pay to the Lord  Abergavenny c and conclude with a whether the twelve juror off the first  inquisition upon the whole matter dyer aforesaid in form aforesaid find give a  trig and legal oath or a false one they pray the discretion and advice of the  justice c and in hill term queen Elizabeth cur ult advis vol see in attaint  the juror demand whether they may give their verdict special as in assize and  the judge say that they can not without say more and afterward S in Trin term  in the three year of queen Elizabeth by the opinion of the court the special  verdict above be hold good and judgement thereupon give accord to the statute  h c