ccl holland and drake case in a ejection strong bring by holland against drake  and five other drake plead not guilty the other five quoad acre plead not  guilty also and as to the residue that long time before that Andrews lessor of  the plaintiff have any thing in the land that Henry Lord Cromwel be seize and  lease the same to they for two year and afterward grant the reversion to  Andrews to who they attorned Andrews within the say term enter upon they and  lease to the plaintiff upon who they reenter as be lawful for they to do the  plaintiff by replication say that long time before the say Lord Cromwel have  any thing c Andrews himself be seize until by the say Lord Cromwel seize and  lease to the defendant ut above and grant the reversion to the say Andrews  with attornment who enter and lease to the plaintiff who enter and be possess  until by the say defendant Leonard er p eject modus form pro ut c and upon  this replication the say five defendant do demurrer in law it be argue that  the plaintiff in his replication have depart from his declaration for by his  declaration he have suppose himself to be eject by all the six defendant and  in the replication he say that he be possess until by the say five defendant  who plead in bar he be eject so he have depart from his declaration in the  number of the ejectors for he ought to have say until he by the say five and  also by the say drake be eject as e in trespass upon entry upon the statute of  r against I and e I die pendant the writ and e plead in bar and the plaintiff  do reply and conclude and so be he seize until the say e comparison cum speech  I name in the writ enter upon the plaintiff c but the opinion of the whole  court be clear to the contrary for here in the case at bar drake by his  several issue which he have join with the plaintiff upon not guilty be sever  from the other five defendant and then when they plead in bar the plaintiff  ought to reply to they without meddle with drake who upon his several plea and  issue join upon it be a stranger to they as if the say five have be the only  defendant but if he have not reply to drake as if drake have make default or  have die after the writ bring as in the case before cite of e there he ought  to have reply as it be object so in a ejection strong of twenty acre the  defendant as to ten acre plead not guilty upon which they be at issue and the  plaintiff reply and say as to the other ten acre and so be he possess until by  the defendant of the say ten acre he be eject this be good without speak of  the other ten acre upon which the general issue be join and the court be ready  to have give judgement for the plaintiff but they look upon the record and see  that one issue in this action be to be try between the plaintiff and the say  drake and although the plaintiff offer to release his damage and the issue  join and to have judgement against the five defendant who have demurrer yet  the court be clear of opinion that no judgement shall be give upon the say  demurrer until the say issue be try for the action be a ejection strong in  which case the possession of the land be to be recover and it may be for any  thing that appear that drake Leonard who have plead the general issue have  title to the land c but if this action have be a action of trespass there in  such case ut above upon release of damage and the issue join the plaintiff  shall have judgement present way d before mich Elizabeth in the king bench