case Lord brook versus Lord and lady hertford Lord chancellor king Eq can ab  pl land convey to trustee in trust as to one moiety to a a infant in tail as  to the other moiety to b who be of age in tail a the infant bring a bill for a  partition cur decree a partition but the trustee not to convey till the infant  be of age that he may join in confirm the partition sir George stride devise  diverse manor and land to trustee and their heir in trust after several other  trust since determine for his two grandaughters the countess of Hertford marry  to the earl of Hertford and Frances lady brook wife of the late Lord brook for  their life share and share alike remainder to the heir of their respective  body and to the heir of their body respective with diverse remainder over the  testator die long since Lord and lady brook die leave the plaintiff the Lord  brook a infant the only issue of their body the plaintiff bring this bill for  a partition and that the trustee shall convey the legal estate of the separate  moiety to be allot to the plaintiff the Lord brook on this partition to he and  the heir of his body in regard though there may peer William be a doubt  whether the lady Hertford have more than a estate for life the word of  inheritance be subsequent to the limitation to the heir of the respective body  of the daughter vide let v jewel ante vol yet as to the plaintiff the Lord  brook who be the only son and heir of the lady brook it must be agree he be  entitle to a estate tail which be admit Lord chancellor decree a partition and  for that purpose let a commission issue to allot one moiety in several to the  plaintiff the Lord brook and the other moiety in severalty to lady Hertford to  hold to they accord to their respective estate which they be entitle to under  the will and let the plaintiff and the defendant the lady Hertford be  respective quiet in the possession of the premise several to be allot as  aforesaid but forasmuch as the infant plaintiff can join in a conveyance of  the moiety to the lady Hertford so that there can be mutual conveyance let the  conveyance to be make by the trustee of the legal estate be respite until the  infant plaintiff come to twentyone or far order of the court at which time all  party interest may join in mutual conveyance Reg lib a fol so tuckfield v  buller Amb attorney general v Hamilton mad then it be object that the will of  sir George stride under who the infant plaintiff the Lord brook claim be not  prove cur this will not be material for a infant when plaintiff be as much  bind and as little privilege as one of full age Gregory v Molesworth atk peer  William er p peer William de term paschae