case burgis against burgis in chancery if a grant be make of a term of year to  a for life with remainder to a and b his wife for life remainder to the first  son of their two body and so on to their other son successive and if they  shall have no son then with remainder over to their daughter the remainder be  void although a and b never have a son but modern er p a daughter only for  such remote contingency tend to create a perpetuity S C l Chan case S C  Pollexf S C finch c r see ante note a side vent Mod Mod Mod pale yellow Eq Rep  Abr Eq vern vern fitzg Prec Chan Cas Tem Talb Peer wms Peer wms Peer wms Ch  Rep Com dig chancery W bro can Ch dougl term Rep term Rep brown Chan case  brown Chan case case tempt Talbot d edition page a term devise de to make new  out of the inheritance to a and the heir male of his body do not determine by  his death without issue but like a term in gross shall go to his executor see  the case of Clare v Clare case lenl Talb a man have a long lease settle it in  trust upon himself for life the remainder to his wife for life the remainder  to the first son of their two body the remainder to the second son and so to  the ten son and if they modern shall have no son or son then the remainder to  such daughter and daughter of their body c the man and his wife die and leave  only a daughter who prefer her bill against the trustee for the execute of  this remainder to her the question be whether this remainder be a good  remainder or whether it be void finch Lord keeper hold it be a void remainder  because it do depend upon so many and such remote contingency for otherwise it  will be a perpetuity and be say he will allow one contingency to be good  videlicet that to the first son though the first son be not in be at the time  of his d cease and be cite a case in dyer and Matthew Hannings case a     Ent  a and Leon Lovies case b roll Abr   more Brownl cro James b and Lampetts case  c roll Abr   Brownl winch Erit c and the case of child v baily d Eq Abr roll  Rep palm cro James Jones but this case be deny to be law Carth and by l c  Nottingham in the duke of Norfolk case Chan Rep see also ld ray term Rep d and  be say he do deny Lord coke opinion in Leon Lovies case e roll Abr   more  Brownl cro James e which say that in case of a lease settle to one and the  heir male of his body when he die the estate be determine for be say it shall  go to his executor a more roll Abr pollexfen   side Cas Chan salk and Peer wms  Com dig chancery W Chan Cas Sheph touch   light a note Fearne a and he say  there be the say case with this in this court Backhurst v Bellingham b Pollexf  b and be say that the commonlaw do complain that this court do encroach upon  they whereas they be behold to this court for their rule in equity as former  when ecclesiastical person make lease a misnomer will avoid they but Elsinere  Lord chancellor in his time will notwithstanding the misnomer make they good