clxiv Annesley and johnson case in a ejection firm upon evidence the case be  that Roger wake be seize c and before h feoff certain person to his use c and  they be so seize to the use aforesaid the say Roger by his will will that his  feoff and Leonard er p executor shall find a chantry in perpetuity and a  priest there to say mass pro anim c and that they procure a licence to alien  in mortmain and also a incorporation for such chantry priory and that the say  land shall be convey to such a priest c and also that every such priest shall  be schoolmaster there and that post dictam cantariam such establish make firm  the say priest shall say mass c Roger wake die the feoff and executor do not  procure any corporation or licence to alien in mortmain nor make any estate to  the chantry priest but the appoint a priest who say mass accord to the will of  the say Roger and be also a schoolmaster and take the profit of the say land  as owner of they and die after which one veer be appoint to be schoolmaster  there but he be mere a layperson and so continue until his death and take the  profit of the land and upon part of the land be build a house and there dwell  and keep a school and after his death one Curtis be appoint by the executor to  beach there and he be a layman and there teach many year and afterward be take  order and become a priest and say mass and other divine service and continue  schoolmaster also and h the same be present for a chantry for firstfruits and  firstfruits be pay for it as appear by a particular which be show in evidence  and also e it be present for a chantry and the possession of it seize into the  king hand and it be much insist upon that veer be a mere layman that the same  be a forcible interruption of the reputation of the chantry but it be the  opinion of the whole court to the Leonard contrary and that notwithstanding  that no corporation be obtain yet because that the priest be appoint by colour  of the will and he say mass accord to the will although veer who succeed he be  a mere layman and not a priest yet afterward when Curtis come be appoint but a  schoolmaster be also a mere layman yet afterward when he take upon he order  and demean himself as a chantry priest there ration institution by the will of  wake which be confirm by the certificate and also by the presentment the first  reputation be revive and the law shall not construe that Curtis take the  profit in the quality of a schoolmaster but as a priest for the law have  respect to the will of the say wake which be the ground of all these proceed  and that although he do not say mass within year before the statute of I e and  note that the certificate of h be that Richard Curtis be cantarista and it  have always be adjudge that a chantry by reputation be within the statute of e  trin Elizabeth in the common plead