arnold vers jefferson S C salk trover lie upon a special property the baillee  of a bind may maintain trover for it trover de scribe his obligatorio the  plaintiff declare that he and I S be bind by this obligation joint and several  to r f that the plaintiff be possess of this and that he lose it and that the  defendant find and convert it c not guilty plead verdict for the plaintiff and  now it be object that though the obligee may bring trover for this bind ut de  scribe his obligatorio yet it can not be scribe obligatorium to a stranger  therefore the plaintiff can not bring trover in this Lord Raymond er p manner  for though it be suppose that the bind be give to the plaintiff yet nothing  pass to he but the material part videlicet paper c but the lie and right of  action continue undisposed in the obligee but it be admit that the plaintiff  he have have trespass because that may be maintain upon the bare possession  but trover will not lie without property therefore the plaintiff have mistake  his action at least if it shall be admit that trover will lie yet the  plaintiff have not bring his action well because this can not be Lord Raymond  scribe suum obligatorium since it appear of his own show that it be the bind  of r f but to this it be answer and resolve by the court that trover and  conversion will lie upon a special property as in case of a carrier that any  stranger may maintain trover for a bind upon a special property by bailment as  well as the obligee himself that a stranger may not only bring trover but also  ut de scribe his obligatorio as well as the obligee himself because the scribe  obligatorium be not insert to declare that the defendant have convert the duty  or choose in action which belong to the plaintiff but to show what sort of  deed it be which be convert for per Treby chief justice it be admit that the  obligee may bring trover pro scribe his obligatorio but in that case the  trover be not of the right of action which be a thing invisible but it be of  the material part of the deed and therefore these word be use to intimate what  sort of deed be convert after verdict that the court will intend that the bind  be give to the plaintiff and in truth the fact be so for the plaintiff be  force to pay the money whereupon the bind be give to he