case edward Fitzgerald to drive to thomas Fitzgerald respondent that April to  a bill file in the court of exchequer in Ireland the defendant plead a decree  and proceed for the same matter in the court of chancery of great Britain the  plea be disallowed But on appeal the order be reverse the question seem to  have be determine on the ground that Ireland be a dependent jurisdiction and  therefore be no precedent as to the kingdom since the stat Geo c the appellant  have at several time from the year till pay and advance to the respondent  several considerable sum of money amount in the whole to pound the respondent  for secure thereof execute to the appellant a bind in the penalty of pound  condition for payment of the say pound and also a warrant of attorney to  confess judgement for the same the appellant out of compassion to the  respondent low circumstance forbear for several year make any demand of this  debt but in the respondent come into the possession of a very considerable  fortune the appellant do then apply to he for payment of the pound and  interest which the respondent neglect to comply with the appellant find  himself under a necessity of threaten to put the bind in suit whereupon the  respondent mere for delay and to stay the appellant proceed at law against he  exhibit his bill in easter term in the court of chancery in great Britain for  relief against the say bind and warrant of attorney suggest among a variety of  other falsehood that the bind be give on a marriage brokage account and that  by agreement it be not to have affect he during his life but be to have be a  demand on his executor or administrator only after his death brown to this  bill the to drive to put his answer and thereby absolute deny the several  suggestion make in the bill concern the consideration of the say bind and the  manner of obtain it and swear that the same be just perfect for the  consideration before mention the cause be at issue several witness be examine  on both side and the same be hear on the that of June before the Lord  chancellor king when his lordship be please to order that the respondent bill  shall stand absolute dismiss with cost the respondent far from attempt to  controvert the justice of this decree either by petition for a rehear or by  appeal against it suffer the same to be duly enrol but to elude the force  thereof and to avoid make any satisfaction to the appellant for his say debt  and cost the respondent immediate withdraw into Ireland where the appellant  with great difficulty three year afterward procure he to be arrest for the  debt due on the say bind whereupon the respondent cause a bill to be file  against the appellant in the court of exchequer in Ireland on the that of  November mere for delay and for the same relief and upon the very same  allegation in the hill so dismiss in the court of chancery in great Britain  and no other save only a collusion which he charge between the appellant and  his the respondent agent and that he be not in London when the say cause be  hear the appellant live in London can not plead or answer within the usual  time and be force to pray a dedimus to put in his answer the respondent obtain  a injunction of course to this bill the appellant on the that of April plead  at large the former bill answer proceed and decree of dismission enrol in bar  of so much of this new bill as seek to draw in question again the same matter  and by his answer brown er p deny the fictitious charge of collusion or  combination with the respondent agent in England or that the respondent be not  in London at the time the former cause be hear on the d of June this plea be  argue but the court do not think proper to allow it and dissolve the  injunction they be only please to order that the benefit of the plea shall be  reserve until the hear of the cause the appellant therefore appeal from this  order insist d rider e Malone that the court of exchequer in Ireland have no  right to examine into the justice of the decree of the court of chancery in  great Britain in the former cause and therefore ought not to have let the  respondent into a fresh inquiry touch any matter which have there receive a  final determination but shall have allow the plea as a absolute bar to so much  of the new bill as seek to draw the same matter into question a second time  that as the merit of the respondent pretend equity have already be try in a  court of competent jurisdiction and find against he brown it will be a most  unreasonable delay of justice to make the appellant wait till the same merit  shall be try over again in the present cause and that this be apprehend to be  the first instance where any court of judicature in a dependant dominion ever  claim or pretend to a jurisdiction of this kind so that it may become a  precedent of the most dangerous consequence to all such suitor as shall be  under the unhappy necessity of follow the person of their debtor out of this  kingdom in order to obtain justice it be therefore hope that the plea will be  allow with cost and the injunction dissolve No case appear to have be print on  the part of the respondent nor do any counsel appear for he on the hear of  this appeal and therefore after hear the appellant counsel it be order and  adjudge that the say order of the court of exchequer in Ireland shall be  reverse and that the plea put in by the appellant shall be allow and the  injunction of the say court obtain by the respondent dissolve jour vol p