case sir Copleston Warwick BAMFIELD versus Popham all Lord keeper Jan a devise  to trustee and their heir in trust for a for life and to his first c son in  tail but if a die without a heir male of his body beget then to go over a be  only tenant for life and the word if he die without a heir male c do not give  he a estate tail by implication post case Henry Roger by will devise his  estate to trustee and their heir in trust for the defendant Popham for life  and to his first and other son in tail but in case the defendant Popham die  without a heir male of his body beget the trust to be void and in such case he  give the estate to defendant the bill be bring to stay waste and for a account  of timber already sell Mr Popham have no son the question be whether the word  if he die without a heir male of his body beget give he a estate tail by  implication and it be hold it can not enlarge a express estate devise to he  for life sander v Nevil Vernon chancery case er report date Vernon chancery  case case sander versus Nevil Jan master of the roll Eq can ab pl S c where a  trust be limit to a man and the heir of his body with remainder over the court  will not decree the trustee to convey to he a estate in fee but a estatetail  only a trust be limit to the plaintiff and the heir of his body and in default  of heir of the plaintiff body or accord to the answer if he shall die without  heir of his body then remainder over the rend and profit to be apply in his  maintenance till and the surplus if any to be pay to he r l with remainder  over the bill be to have the trustee convey to he in fee this be not correct  the bill be for a conveyance to plaintiff and the heir of his body he have  attain and have two child in marriage and the defendant insist that the will  be so word it be the intention of the testatrix that the plaintiff shall not  have the legal estate nor be enable to dock the entail but that the premise  shall be preserve for the heir of the body of the plaintiff if he shall leave  any at his death or in default thereof for the person in remainder and the  decree be that the defendant the trustee shall execute a conveyance of the  estate in question to the plaintiff and the heir of his body Reg lib b fol  vide Phillips v Phillips post and p wms S c Vernon chancery case er p the  master of the roll decree they to convey a estatetail only and refuse to  decree a conveyance in fee and the case of Mr cook and uvoodward be cite where  the Lord jefferies do refuse to decree a conveyance in fee the remainder after  a estatetail be limit to a charity