coke DOCT0R hutchinson case simony if a presentation to a benefice with cure  be make for money fee reward or other profit the presentation admission and  induction be void although he who be present know nothing of it in the case of  dr Hutchinson parson of Kenn in the county of Devon it be resolve per totan  curian that if any shall receive or take money fee reward or other profit for  any presentation to a benefice with cure although in truth he which be present  be not know of it yet the presentation admission and induction be v oidper to  press out word staluti of Henry cap and the king shall have the pre a Acc  bagshaw v goward cro James SC S p Noy where it be say by Noy arg that it be  resolve in one Pridenzs case that a man may shear a estray but can work it Vid  vin ab estray e accord to roll ab distress p pl Vid ab distress p pl Com dig  distress d if a cow be take for a distress the distrainer can milk her for  though the cow be the better for it yet he ought not to do good to the owner  without his consent and perhaps the owner will have come before any damage by  this come to the cow and if it perish by this yet be that take the distress  may distrain again and so he be at no damage h James b r between bagshaw and  galliard per curian in the report of bagshaw and Gavin Noy which be say to  have occur James but be probable the same case with that in roll ab it be say  that a cow take for a distress can be milk nor wrought because it be a  punishment to the owner and in guard law in the report of the case by croak  nom bagshaw v goward the point do not full appear but it be say that a  distress may not be use because he have it by law only as a gage in  chamberlain case Leon the court to differ Anderson I say that beast distrain  as cow can not be milk in more v Conham Owen the court agree that if a man  take a distress he can work the distress for it be only the act of the law  that give power to the distress for he have no property in the distress nor  possession injure in Duncomb v reeve cro Elizabeth Bac ab distress d it be say  by Popham CJ that one may in some case meddle with and use a distress where it  be for the owner benefit as where one distrain armour he may cause they to be  scour to avoid rust so if one distrain raw cloth he may cause it to be full  for it be for the owner benefit in king v Colton Ves the doubt be notice by  Parker ch but he give no opinion himself whether a cow take as a distress may  be milk but be refer to cro James as a authority for the affirmative and to    as countenance the opinion the learned chief baron seem to have overlook the  fact thet both in the case in croak as well as in that in the twelve report  the cow be suppose to have be take not as a distress but as a estray cow take  as a estray be in a different situation from those take as a distress for in  the former case the party take they be bind to find they in food as long as he  keep they if cow be take in withernam inasmuch as they be deliver to the party  in lieu of his own cattle they may be milk by he chamberlain case ub sup and  Vid anon Leon coke report er p sentation here vice for the statute intend to  inflict punishment upon the patrol as upon the author of this corruption by  the loss of his presentation and upon the incumbent who come in by such a  corrupt patron by the loss of his incumbency although that he never know of it  but if the presentee be not cognizant of the corruption then he shall not be  within the clause of disability in the same statute and so it be resolve by  all the justice in fleet street mich James fol vide word to cause to stand  which be very well pen against the avarice of corrupt patron a