ccclxix CLEYPOOLS case information upon the statute of Elizabeth of tillage  information in the exchequer against Cleypool upon the statute of tillage  Elizabeth set forth that the defendant have convert three hundred acre of  arable land of tillage to pasture and the same conversion have continue from  Elizabeth unto the two and twenty of Eliz the defendant as to the conversion  plead not guilty and as to the continuance the general pardon by parliament  Elizabeth upon which the attorneygeneral do demurrer in law it be argue that  that pardon do not extend to the continuance of the say conversion and first  the baron be clear of opinion that if a be seize of arable land and convert  the same to pasture and so convert leas it to b who continue it in pasture as  he find it he shall be charge by that statute and it be not any good  construction where the exception in the pardon be except the convert of any  land from tillage to pasture make do commit or permit that the conversion  except out of the pardon shall be intend and construe the bare act of  conversion but the whole offence I the continuance and practice of it be  understand as if by general pardon all intrusion be except now Leonard er p by  that the instant act of intrusion I the bare entry be not only except but also  the continuance of the intrusion and the perception of the profit and note the  word of the statute be conversion permit and conversion continue be conversion  permit and the say statute do not punish the conversion but also the  continuance of the conversion for the penalty be appoint for each year in  which the conversion continue and Egerton solicitor put this case h it be  enact by h cap that upon recovery in debt if the defendant in delay of  execution sue a writ of error and the judgement be affirm be shall pay damage  now the case be that one in execution bring such a writ of error and the first  judgement be affirm he shall pay damage and yet here be not any delay of the  execution for the defendant be in execution before but here be a interruption  of the execution and the statute do intend the execution it self I the  continuance in execution ibidem to delay until what time it be say on the  other side that the conversion and continuance thereof be two several thing  each by it self and so the conversion only be except in the pardon the  continuance thereof remain in the grace of the pardon and it appear by the  statute of and Ph man that conversion and continuance be not the same but  alian and to visit and distinct thing in the consideration of the law for  there it be enact that if any person shall have any land to be hold in tillage  accord to the say statute but convert to pasture by any other person the  commissioner c have authority by the say statute to enjoin such person to  convert such land to tillage again c and in all case in the law there be a  difference betwixt the beginning of a wrong and the continuance of it as the  father levy a nuisance in his own land to the offence of another and die a  assize of nuisance do not lie against the heir for the continuance of that  wrong but a quod to let pass see f n it be adjourn Leonard mich Elizabeth in  the king bench