case hoar against clement admiralty jurisdiction the defendant libel in the  admiralty against a ship and one Harris the master of her and smith her late  owner and hoar my client the plaintiff now owner for sail and other necessary  find to the ship in the plaintiff suggest the statute of Richard saint c and  that the material work do and contract make and every thing contain in the  libel be do on land and not super deeply mare and that in July last after the  time specify in the libel the plaintiff buy the ship cum omni preparation for  a considerable sum of money at land this suggestion I draw and thereupon I  move for a prohibition for though the sail be for the ship and do about it yet  they be not absolute necessary nor be it in a voyage so that the libel be not  for any suppose hypothecation by the master in a time and case of urgent  necessity beside we buy her upon land with all her furniture and the defendant  have his action at law upon his contract and for his ware sell and in cro  James be a express case violet v blague a ship lie at anchor be not within the  admiral be jurisdiction here be the case of Meuxin v Pensilminian about last  term be twelve month in which my Lord jefferies be then of counsel and a  prohibition be grant after several debate upon this very suggestion in the  case of leigh v Burleigh Owen be a case much like this a master of a ship buy  sail clothes and other thing and they be deliver to he aboard his ship that be  in the Thames and a prohibition grant because corpus come beside it appear  here and that by their own libel that the ship be in a port and that we have  buy her since and this case be express within the word of the c cotton record  the statute Richard c Rastals old statute Edward remembr parliament roll  Richard d part member parliament roll d Richard Plessingtons case Henry Inst  Inst e page f cro James g pritchard case easter term car b r h state trial I  state trial shower KB er p resolution of the admiral jurisdiction in cro car  it be in the old shower KB edition but not in the last and it be in Hugh Abr  that a prohibition ought to go the case be that sail and other good be deliver  on board in a port then the owner sell her with the furniture and the old  owner and the master run away and they will saddle the buyer with these thing  in the admiralty whereas no action lie at law for the same Mr Jones on the  other side will have have we put in bail here for the defendant in the  admiralty I offer it for ourselves for we have nothing to do with any other  person we have buy the ship and pay for her at length a prohibition be grant  as to the ship and my client hoar c