case the king against lord dover outlawry of a peer omit the addition of his  barony be erroneous SC comb Henry Lord Dover be outlaw on a indictment for  treason and he bring a writ of error the assignment of error be et super hoc  Henry Baro de Dover who per nomen Henry dn Dover utlaget step forth in not  common with others mask svan go for sale et to say quod in record et process  pillage ac etian in promulgatione utlagariae pillage manifesto be erratum in  hoc quod dom jacobus secundus recently king England per litter urge patenes  sub Magno seal his England gerent that at Westminster die maii year royal  power Himself primo who idem Henry hic in cur proffer A king of Corinth the  same Henry baron shower KB de Dover per nomen henr baron de Dover in Com  Kantiae unde ex quo pillage Henry baron de Dover pillage in record process et  promulgatione utlagar pillage non nominator baron de Dover nec to have in the  same aliq sufficient addition sive distinction therefore in eastern manifest  be erratum erratum be etian in hoc videlicet quod non constat per record  pillage Self henric before outlaw per judgment coronator nec per pron   interrog  judgment outlaw to be prout per law what royal power England to  agree to withhold therefore in eastern manifest be erratum erratum be etian in  hoc videlicet quod tempore indictament et process pillage locus resident  pillage henr to be at paroch Sti James Westminster in Com Middlesex et non  incivitat l well alibi extra pillage come Mid et quod no one breve de capias  unquan to flow out viscount come Middlesex pillage super indictament pillage  prout per stat what royal power England emanasse to withhold therefore in  eastern manifesto be erratum erratum be etian in hoc videlicet quod per record  et process pillage that this only is apparent the same Hen outlaw be where per  law terrae no one judgment outlaw versus the same Henry superinde to bring  forward publicly seu some processus versus pillage henr super indictament  pillage become emanar seu adjudicar to withhold therefore in eastern manifesto  be erratum et hoc a preparation be verify unde petit jud c note that the say  judgement be reverse for the first error assign videlicet want of a true  addition accord to the statute Henry c as to the second that be none b see the  case of Blackwell v Nash stram and clark v Tyson stram in point and see boon v  Eyre h Bl Rep notorious facts shower KB er p because in London and the  practice there be always different as to the three quer the statute Henry c  and Henry c