case in chancery Snelling contra squib eoden die notice purchaser of land  subject to judgement not enforce to discover otherwise if to decree Snelling  have judgement against Sidenham of pound for payment of pound squib purchase  of Sidenham for valuable consideration without notice Snelling sue squib to  discover land subject c that he may extend not know the place case in chancery  er p nor who tenant squib plead his purchase for valuable consideration  without notice the Lord chancellor allow the plea for such purchase shall not  be hurt in chancery against the plea and therefore squib shall not be enforce  to discover what land be liable it be much debate and object that a judgement  bind the land who ever have it and the plaintiff bill be not to have a decree  for his debt or to have the land but to discover the same whereby at law he  may recover his debt his Title be give he by Act of parliament by which the  land be subject and be not of commonlaw the consequence of this will make all  statute and judgement which be a security by law to become of no effect for  the Conuzee must extend the whole or a moiety of the whole and if he omit any  part his extent be avoidable and by consequence he that acknowledge a statute  or judgement and after alien any part for valuable consideration secret it  will be in his power to avoid his own security there will be no difference  between a judgement obtain by consent and a judgement in invitum or process of  law in which case it will be very hard for any person that any man by his own  Act shall avoid the justice of the law whether he carry it secret or open or  to enable any other man to do it by secret or other mean where man contract  the purchaser may provide for himself by covenant but he that recover by law  can provide for himself b covenant so that the case S more strong in case of a  judgement than in case of a mortgage or other estate by conveyance case in  chancery a purchaser from I S who have a decree against he in chancery for  land shall be bind by the decree though he have never notice of it and yet the  decree in chancery bind the person and not the land and the judgement may bind  the person or the land and it be hard that the chancery who power be only over  the person shall execute their own decree against a purchaser and not assist  the execution of a judgement at law whereas a purchaser after a judgement be  as innocent as purchaser after a decree in point of conscience but the last  objection at the hear be not make