brewster versus kitchen see SC comb sub dom Brewster v Kidgill Mod e r with  note covenant to pay c free of all tax a rend be grant year with a covenant  that it shall be for ever pay free from all tax and the court doubt whether  the tenant may lawful detain for the tax of S per the first clause in the  statute charge every hereditament but after this say tenant to pay and deduct  and there be another clause not to make void any agreement between landlord  and tenant or any other sir Barth shower   Jeffere S case reach only to  landholder a rentcharge be not subject to any such charge so that free from  tax must be intend parliamentary sergeant wright contra here be nothing to  hinder the tenant from deduct rend be express mention in Elizabeth so in h of  sewer both plaintiff and defendant be party to the Act of parliament and it be  not to be intend that man covenant against future parliamentary tax Ven  Davenant S case Lucy versus Levington holt Ch I the case of Lucy be not for  brother wright yet it do not seem to make any thing against he if a attainder  be reverse by Act of parliament a patentee shall not answer for mesne profit  otherwise if reverse by writ of error h I make a great question whether it be  good unless it be express mention tax impose or to be impose by Act of  parliament as to Jefferey S case this by the ancient law and custom of England  that parishioner do contribute it be not so by the civil law for the parson  have the freehold Comberbach I think this feign issue have be direct out of  chancery else I will not have try d it do you bring fob action to learn the  opinion of the court sir Barth shower one of the great case in my Lord coke S  report be so holt ay Corbet S case which be only a preparative for Mildmay S  case which be the real one but I have hear my Lord chancellor finch say when  at the bar that Comberbach er p it be not know to be so till too late and then  Anderson be very angry they shall bring a proper action vide residuum post