ambler case peat against Powell see Cropton v Davies l r c p devise of the  residue of real and personal estate to executor for a till he attain and then  the trust to cease give the whole beneficial estate to a a release from a  young brother to the old of certain premise which have be devise to he by his  father execute in consequence of a threat to file a bill set aside in favour  of creditor lib Reg b foe S c Eden that Feb and that march Giles Powell be  seize in fee of a estate call Fexcoate and be also seize of another estate  call Frogmore for three life which estate be of near equal value and have a  wife and two son John his old and Giles and also two daughter make his will rd  July and thereby give a annuity of pound to his wife for her life Payable out  of both estate and also give her a house and close part of the freehold for  her life and after her death to his executor he give pound to each of his  daughter and several other legacy and take notice that he have lie out great  sum in the education of his old son John in consideration thereof he direct  his old son John to relinquish all his right in the leasehold estate to his  son Giles to who he give the say leasehold estate charge with the legacy and  annuity and then he devise all the rest residue and remainder of his real and  personal estate good and chattel to leak and how in trust for his young son  Giles till he attain and then the trust to cease the testator die d may Giles  attain in the testator lifetime soon after the testator death John claim the  freehold estate as heir at law to the testator and insist that the will be  void and threaten to commence a suit at law unless Giles will convey the  estate to he to avoid which at the recommendation of his mother Giles by  indenture of the that of August release and convey his right to the freehold  estate to his brother John who covenant to pay half the annuity to the mother  at the time of execute the release Giles be indebt to one gillet pound upon  bind and on the d December become bankrupt bill by assignee inter alian to  have the estate convey and the deed and write deliver up to they two question  be make in the cause saint what interest Giles be intend by the testator to  ambler take in the freehold estate whether a fee or only till he attain d  suppose he be entitle to the fee whether the release to John be voluntary and  void by stat Elizabeth against his creditor sir Robert Henley Lord keeper  after take time for consideration deliver his opinion that as to saint  question Giles be intend to have the whole beneficial interest in the residue  of the real and personal estate and that the trust be to continue only during  his minority that it be the same as if the testator have say I give the estate  to trustee in trust for Giles till he attain and then to Giles and his heir  that shepherd v Newland wms be a much strong case p wms see what be say of  this case in Fonereau v Fonereau atk and see challenger v shepherd t r to d  question this be not like the case where conveyance be make to quiet family  difference in which case the court will not require strict equality of  consideration see Wycherley v Wycherley Eden Cann v Cann p W ambler er p  Naylor v winch S S here be no equivalent give by John he do not so much as  release his right to the Frogmore estate here be no fraud but be a voluntary  conveyance be void as against the creditor of Giles see partridge v Gopp post  so where a legacy be give to trustee to invest and pay the interest to a and  in case she marry or die the interest to be pay to b in trust for her till she  come of age hold b take the legacy absolute hall v beck Eden see Philips v  chamberlain Ves stretch v Watkins mad c c