case S upton against basset if a man make a lease by fraud and afterward make  another lea good fide the second lessee shall not avoid the first lease cro  James   more keb W Jones t Jones I vent   bridge lane SC lev verh I lev hard  roll Rep ves bull n p will burr Com dig Powel on power Cowp Bl Com trespass  upon demurrer the case be that the plaintiff and defendant claim by several  lease from one and the same person the plaintiff in his replication aver that  the defendant lease be make upon fraud but show not any fine by himself pay  for his lease nor any rend reserve thereupon nor any other valuable consider  cion wherefore it be make whereupon the defendant demurrer thereto Yelverton  at the commonlaw there be not any fraud remedy which shall defeat a after  purchase but that only which be commit to defraud a former interest quod to be  concession per curian and the statute of Elizabeth c do not remedy it for  there be not any money or consideration pay for this second lease no more than  for the first and therefore not aid by that statute Lewknor contra FoF every  one who obtain any thing or estate by his own act be a purchaser and so within  the word of the statute the plaintiff have also aver that it be make by fraud  to deceive he which be confess by the demurrer wherefore c Anderson the  confess the fraud be not material forasmuch as the plaintiff be not such a  person as ought to have benefit thereof and within the remedy and provision of  the statute it be clear a fraudulent conveyance be not make void against all  by that statute but only against those who afterward come to the land upon  good consideration for so be the word and so be the intent of the statute and  therefore if a man who have not good government of himself make a conveyance  by advice of his friend of his land upon trust and without any consideration  and afterward one procure he for five hundred pound or other petty  consideration to sell unto he land worth five hundred pound per annum although  this last purchaser pay money yet he shall not avoid the first conveyance for  the statute be make to help those who come to land upon good consideration  lawful and not without consideration or by any indirect mean and this case  have be resolve Walmsley accord for it be not void against all no more than if  a fraudulent gift he of good it be not fraud by the Elizabeth c against all  but only against his creditor but remain good against the donor himself a  Heaumond this be not void against all as a feoff upon maintenance or champerty  be not void against the feoff but against he who have right and I be privy to  a case which be resolve by the two chief justice and three other justice  videlicet one make a lease for eighty year without consideration and afterward  convey the land to his wife for a jointure after marriage and they resolve  because this last conveyance be voluntary without valuable consideration that  the wife can not avoid the former lease by aver that it be fraudulent Owen  accord croak Elizabeth with they in omnibus and say that he be at the make of  this statute wherein specidl care be take that there shall not he any word  which shall extend to purchaser but such as pay money or other good  consideration for their purchase wherefore it be adjudge for the defendant t    a adjudge to he but a tenancy in common and the judgement affirm on a writ of  error by four judge against three post a dyer     yely cro James croak  Elizabeth er p