case Dorothy love widow and another appellant henry lestrange and other  respondent that February Mews dig xiv follow in sander v Vamtier Cr and Ph and  see Pearson v dolman l r Eq a give all his personal estate to trustee until W  shall attain and from thenceforth in trust for he his executor administrator  and assign the legatee live to attain but die intestate before hold that the  representative of W be entitle as the right vest in he immediate upon the  testator death and that the age of be mention not to prevent the right from  vest in W before that age but to direct the trustee as to the time of payment  decree of Lord chancellor king affirm Walter Walterson by his will date the d  of December after give several legacy bequeathe the residue of his personal  estate in these word videlicet brown er p and I hereby give and bequeathe unto  my say love friend sir Nicholas lestrange and unto Henry lestrange his young  son who I make the executor of this my will all the rest and residue of my  good chattel and personal estate whatsoever as shall remain after all my debt  legacy funeral and other charge of the say executorship and trust of this my  will full pay and satisfy and this my will full perform accord to the true  intent thereof in trust to sell dispose and improve the same to the best  advantage as in their judgement and discretion of they and the survivor of  they and the executor and administrator of such survivor whereunto for gain or  loss the same be hereby whole refer until Walter Nash of Docking in the say  county shall attain his age of twentyfour year it be my desire that he shall  be employ whole in his trade either as a apprentice accord to his present  indenture or as a journeyman until his say age upon trust in my say love  friend brown repose and from the age of twentyone year of the say Walter Nash  out of the say residue to pay he a annuity of pound yearly until his age of  twentyfour year and from thenceforth in trust for he the say Walter Nash his  executor administrator and assign and the account of the say residue to be  give by my say trustee to be bind and conclusive to he without exception or  any question at all to be make by he or they therefore and the testator by his  say will give to the say sir Nicholas lestrange and Henry lestrange his  executor fifty guinea provide they will undertake the executorship and act  therein in march the testator die without issue and the executor prove the  will and possess his personal estate the surplus whereof amount to about pound  and afterward sir Nicholas lestrange die Walter Nash attain his age of but die  before his age of intestate and a bachelor whereupon the respondent Henry Nash  and Susan Nash obtain letter of administration of his personal estate in  Michaelmas term the respondent gawen Nash Francis hill and Frances his wife  William smith and mary his wife and jane Nash exhibit their bill in the court  of chancery against the say Henry Nash and Susan Nash as administrator of the  intestate and against the say Henry lestrange the survive executor of the  testator to have a account of the say intestate estate and that they may have  their share thereof as be his next of kin and also to have a account of the  personal estate of the testator Walter Walterson and that the residue thereof  may be pay to they and the say intestates administrator insist that such  residue vest in Walter Nash although he die before his age of and so belong to  his administrator and next of kin the respondent Henry lestrange by his answer  set forth what the residue of the testator personal estate amount to and say  he be ready to pay the same as the court shall direct and the respondent Henry  Nash and Susan Nash by their answer insist that such residue belong to the  next of kin of the intestate and ought to be pay to they as his administrator  but in Hilary term follow the appellant exhibit their cross bill against the  respondent for a account of the testator personal estate and to have the  residue thereof pay to they as they be the next of kin of the testator insist  that Walter Nash die before his age of such residue do not vest in he but  belong to the next of kin of the testator the respondent Henry lestrange  submit to the judgement of the court to who such residue belong whether to the  appellant as next of kin of the testator or to the other respondent as next of  kin of Walter Nash and be ready to pay the same as the court shall direct and  the other respondent insist brown that such residue belong to they as next of  kin of Walter Nash the intestate on the d of August both cause come on to be  hear before the Lord chancellor king when his lordship be please to decree  that the respondent Henry lestrange shall account before the master for the  testator personal estate and for the profit and increase thereof and that he  shall pay and deliver over to the respondent Henry Nash and Susan Nash the  surplus of such estate and the security belong to the same after payment of  his debt legacy and funeral expense and all party to the say suit except the  appellant be to have their cost which the master be to tax and the respondent  Henry Nash and Susan Nash the ad brown er p nistrators of the intestate be to  divide the remainder of the money in their hand or which shall come to their  hand of the testator personal estate after payment of the cost into six equal  part to and among the six next of kin of the say Walter Nash the intestate  videlicet to retain to each of they the say Henry and Susan Nash one six part  thereof and to pay one other six part to the respondent gawen Nash another six  part to the respondent hill and his wife another six part to the respondent  smith and his wife and the other six part to the respondent jane Nash and that  the bill bring by the appellant shall be dismiss but without pay any cost in  respect thereof from this decree the appellant appeal insist p York W peer  William that by the testator will it appear he never intend that Walter Nash  shall be entitle to any advantage by the bequest of the residue of his  personal estate save only to the provision of pound a year until his age of  and that the right or property of such residue be not to vest in he till that  time and as Walter die before he attain that age and before any title to the  residuary estate vest in he the benefit of the devise can not belong to his  representative but ought to be consider as a lapse legacy and undisposed of by  the testator will and consequent belong to the appellant as his next of kin  and as not be give from they by the will on the other side it be contend c  Talbot t Lutwyche that the bequest of the residue of the testator personal  estate after debt and legacy pay be absolute and unconditional and the trust  be declare for Walter Nash in the manner mention in the will the equitable  right to such residue vest in he immediate upon the testator death and though  he die before he attain such right be transmissible to his proper  representative the age of be mention not to prevent the right from vest in  Walter before that age but to direct the trustee as to the time of pay it to  he that there be no material difference between a money legacy give to one  absolute out of a personal estate to be pay at a future day where it have  always be hold that such a legacy become vest and will belong to the proper  representative of the legatee although such legatee shall die brown before the  day of payment and the present bequest of the residue to the executor upon the  trust before mention and therefore it be hope that as the decree be just and  accord to the rule of equity it will be affirm and the appear dismiss with  cost accord after hear counsel on this appeal it be order and adjudge that the  same shall be dismiss and the decree therein complain of affirm jour vol p