case the king against the bishop OF Rochester and sir Francis clerk Hilary  term car roll the king be seize of a manor to which a advowson be appendant  and which be before hold by a abbot grant the manor without the advowson to a  bishop who regrants both the manor and advowson to the king a grant afterward  make by the king of the manor with the appurtenance name the advowson and  describe the whole as former belong to the abbot and late to the bishop passes  the advowson S C Mod S C keb roll Rep     hob cro Elizabeth Yelv cro James  lane   Mod ld ray the case upon a special verdict be thus the king be seize in  fee of the manor of Leyborn in the county of ken to which the advowson of the  church of Leyborn be appendant which manor come to he by the dissolution of  monastery have be part of the possession of the abbot of GrayChurch grant the  manor to the archbishop of Canterbury and his successor save the advowson  afterward the king present to the church be void I S the archbishop of  Canterbury grant the manor and the advowson to the king his heir and successor  which grant be confirm by the dean and chapter the king grant the manor with  the appurtenance and this advowson name it in particular which late do belong  to the archbishop of Canterbury and to the abbot of GrayChurch together with  all privilege profit commodity c in as ample manner as they come to the king  hand by the grant of the archbishop or by colour or pretence of any grant from  the archbishop or confirmation of the dean and chapter or by surrender of the  late abbot of GrayChurch or as ample as they be now or at any time be in our  hand to sir Edward north and his heir c the question be whether or no by this  modern grant the advowson pass Newdigate sergeant the king be not apprise of  his title and therefore the grant be void a   a a for he think this advowson  come to he by grant from the archbishop b Inglefields case more b if the king  be deceive I n deed or in law his grant be void c bro patent     Arthur legals  case hob dyer more     Henry b roll   Ent c Hardres sergeant contra he lie  down four ground or rule whereby to construe the king letter patent first  where a particular certainty precede it shall not be destroy by a uncertainty  or a mistake come after d cro car Yel Leon and Edward pl b Henry pl godb  markham case cite in Arthur legals case rep d second modern er p there be a  difference when the king mistake his title to the prejudice of his tenure or  profit and when he be mistake only in some description of his grant which be  but supplemental and not material nor issuable e Edward pl Henry pl Henry pl  and Henry pl Edward pl lane   Bulstr e three distinct word of relation in the  king grant be good to pass away any thin a dyer     a fourthly when the king  grant be upon a valuable consideration they shall be construe favourable for  the patentee for the honour of the king b Edward de quo warranto Inst   sir  John Molyns case   a b then he apply all these rule to the case in question  and pray judgement Maynard sergeant argue afterward against the pass of the  advowson he say those two description of the advowson videlicet belong late to  the archbishop of Canterbury and former to the abbot of GayChurch be couple  together with a conjunctive et so that both must be true so here be a falsity  in the first and material part of the grant videlicet the description of the  thing grant though the advowson of Leyborn be name yet it be so name as to be  capable of a generality for there may be more advowson than one belong to that  manor this falsity go to the title of the church No subsequent word will aid  this misrecital for the description of the thing grant end there the follow  word to such a degree full c and whatever come after do but set out how full  and ample he shall modern enjoy the thing grant and be no part of its  description can enlarge it or make it more certain turner sergeant contra cite  the book name in the margin c Bacon element the case of the queen v Lewis Leon  veritas a means of knowing to lift wandering a showing Edward pl and Plowd    Poph   Edward Fitzherbert grant Henry pl sir John lestrange scarce Markham  scarce lOCoin ArthitrLegat scarce CroCar Ann needler case in hob Henry pl bro  annuity baker v Bacon cro James and Bozouns case Rep   cro James Leon roll  prerog Le roy   Edward pl   roll prerog l     the earl of Salops case   light  b more roll c the court this term give their judgement that the advowson do  well pass in this grant there be as large word and the same word that be in  whistler case d   Ro Rep Ro ab d and the king be not here deceive neither in  the value nor in his title and judgement be give accord