a information against sip edward Dimock the bishop of Carlisle call John may  in a Elizabeth make a lease in reversion to queen Elizabeth of the manor of  Horncastle whereof the bishop be seize in right of his bishopric and this be  for year and it be acknowledge before commissioner appoint for this purpose  and the bishop pray it to be enrol and this prayer be endorse but not enrol  and in Elizabeth this lease be confirm by the dean and chapter in the life of  the lessor and in Elizabeth the successor bishop lease this land to sir Edward  Dimock the statute of the of Elizabeth bath a proviso that it shall not extend  to any lease before make by the bishop of Carlisle to queen Elizabeth then not  enrol and after the death of the queen videlicet James this lease in Elizabeth  be return and certify to be acknowledge and be then also enrol and sir Edward  Dimock have enter and be in possession by virtue of his lease in the James and  the information be for entry and intrusion in James and upon the bar all this  matter be discover and a demurrer join George crook for the king conceive that  the lease make in the Elizabeth be good first he say that although the queen  can take a inheritance or freehold without matter of record yet she may take  chattel upon a surmise make that they be grant unto her and therefore he vouch  if foe that a obligation may be grant to the king without enrolment of the  grant and assize pl brook title suggestion pl it appear lane that the king  shall have a chattel by a demise by parole upon a suggestion make thereof in  the exchequer without a record and in the h foe the king baily who be not of  record may be compel to account upon a suggestion make brook suggestion plan  and in the h foe if the king give good with his hand this be good although no  record be make thereof because it be but a chattel and by the same reason be  infer that be may also accept of chattel without a record but admit that he  can take without a record it seem that here be a thing well enough record to  entitle the king after the return make by the commissioner for the  commissioner be officer of record to this purpose and they endorse the prayer  of the party to have it record and this be after the return be a sufficient  record to entitle the king and he vouch the h foe where the servant of justice  Catesby after the death of the judge make a return and this be good and the h  a record certify by a judge after he be displace and assize if a coroner make  his roll and die before he certify they they may be certify after his death  and so here this acknowledgement and prayer be certify may at any time after  be enrol and although it seem by the book in the Elizabeth dyer foe that a  grant be make to the king and acknowledge before one of the master of the  chancery and enrol in the time of another king make not the grant good yet he  say that it be adjudge for another grant make to the king by the duke of  Somerset and acknowledge before one of the master of chancery and enrol in the  time of another king be good enough to perfect the grant and this be by a  grant make by the duke of Bozoms inn in London and he say that it be not  reasonable that the law shall adjudge otherwise for it may be that the clark  will not enrol it until such a time videlicet a month within which time the  king may die shall it now be reasonable that it shall not be enrol at all he  say it be unreasonable and he say that it appear by the h foe that a deed  deliver at the king coffer be good enough to avoid his lease make in the  Elizabeth for although that it be true that a grant of a reversion shall never  operate to the destruction of a right of a three person yet it seem that a act  commence may be confirm well enough to the destruction of a mean interpose act  and it seem that the enrolment here be but a confirmation of a precedent lease  and not a relation to make a thing which be not before and therefore to  examine what thing a enrolment be and it seem to he that it be no matter of  record as it appear e and h foe and therefore it appear by Wymacks case cook  that a deed enrol ought to be plead hic in curian lengthen which prove that  the deed and not the enrolment thereof be the thing which passes the estate  and therefore he vouch the case in the e brook title faits if one joint tenant  sell all his land in d a I after his companion die and then the deed be enrol  yet a moiety only shall pass and Elizabeth cook Perimans case lib if a man  make a feoff of land and enrol the deed within t manor as by the custom it you  he to be yet the enrolment shall pass nothing and therefore it be there lane  er p say the enrolment may be good enough after the death of the party so by  the same reason aforesaid it be put in the same case of periman and also in  butler and baker case cook lib that if a man deliver a write as a escrow to be  his deed upon certain condition perform and after the obligor and the obligee  die and then the condition be perform the deed be good for there be giving up  begin in the life of the party and this be after consummate take his effect by  force of the first delivery and acknowledgement and therefore also he say that  it be late adjudge that if two man be mention to be bind by one obligation and  the one seal at one day and the other at another day this be as good as if it  have be at one day and therefore be say that there be no doubt but if a lease  be make to the king by a bishop and after another lease be make also of the  same land or if the bishop die yet if after the first lease be enrol this lane  be good and therefore also he cite a case to be adjudge in banc king Elizabeth  between Collins and Harding that if a man be seize of freehold and copyhold  land and make a lease of both for year with licence render rend and after he  grant the reversion of the freehold and make a surrender of the copyhold to  the use of the same person and a attornment be have for the freehold and the  presentment of the surrender for the copyhold be not make until a year after  yet he in reversion shall have a action of debt for all the rend for the  presentment the surrender be but a perfection of the surrender before make  also he cite the case as I observe he to this effect in the that of Elizabeth  n the abbot of Colchesters case where be say that the abbot of Colchester  commit treason and after make a lease for year and then he surrender to the  king all his land and after a office find the treason and it be hold the lease  be good against the king who take by the surrender and not by the treason  commit before but as Walter say the case be adjudge that the king shall avoid  the lease for now he be in by the treason paramount the surrender