case BOWAMAN versus reeve ante a native of holland possess of a personal  estate both there and in England and make his will in holland how it must be  construe so as to take effect notwithstanding the difference of the law of  each country the defendant testator be seize of a considerable estate in  holland consist in house good merchandise jewel and other effect and be a  native of that country and reside there send for a notary public to make his  will and accord to the custom of the country a instrument be draw up in the  nature of a will and execute whereby the testator give some of the house to  the minister of the Presbyterian meeting there and other to the minister of  the reform church there and then give all the residue of his good chattel  plate jewel and other effect which be very particular enumerate to the  defendant who he make his universal heir and executor and die possess of a  very considerable personal estate in England beside what he have in holland by  the law of that country there be no distinction between real and personal  estate but both be equal liable to the satisfaction of creditor and therefore  after the testator death his creditor in holland take precedent in chancery  possession of those house so specifical precedent in chancery er p devise as  aforesaid for the satisfaction of their debt and though there be other  considerable effect in holland yet the reside devisee and executor will not  intermeddle therewith because by the law of that country if he do he must take  upon he the payment of all the testator debt whether they excite or fall short  of his asset but he prove the will here in England and by virtue thereof  possess himself of all the testator estate and effect here and thereupon the  plaintiff who be devisees of the house in holland bring this bill against the  executor and residuary agot to have a recompense in proportion to the value of  the say house and my Lord chancellor decree a account and satisfaction accord  and though it be urge that those house by the law of this country be liable to  the payment of debt and therefore the specific devisees must take they liable  thereto and that the testator never intend to give they otherwise or to give  they any other part of his estate and that they must take they cum load yet he  hold that they shall have such account and satisfaction as aforesaid and my  Lord chancellor further say that there be no difference between a devise of  these house and a devise of a horse or a term for year here and that in those  case if the creditor bring a action or take out execution upon a judgement  against the executor and take the horse or term for year in execution which  they may do notwithstanding the specific devise thereof yet most certain the  executor or residuary legatee shall be oblige in equity to make they a  recompense for they be to have nothing to their own use but the residue after  the debt and legacy pay and this residuum be Chargeable with the debt though  as to the creditor they must take what part they think fit in satisfaction of  their debt and the enumerate of particular in this devise of the residuum make  precedent in chancery it no more a specific devise than if he have only say in  general all the rest of his good and chattel or such like word and therefore  this residuum be liable to the payment of debt although the creditor think fit  to fix on other part of his estate and thereby deprive the specific legatee of  what be intend they precedent in chancery de boundary S HILLARII in curian  porter