a and b afterward countess of Suffolk and since decease by bind be each indebt  to I S in pound afterward I S by will give these two sum and all interest due  for the same to c and devise away the surplus of her estate with a proviso  that in equity case abridge case all or any part of these two sum shall be pay  in before the Testatrixs death then she give to the say c pound or so much  money as the principal money so pay in shall amount unto as the case shall  fall out afterward the testatrix in her lifetime release to a the pound due  upon his bind without have receive any part of the money and die and c die  intestate whereupon equity case abridge er p the say a who be her brother  administer to her and demand the pound release to himself upon his bind and  also the pound due upon b s bind the first he demand out of the asset of the  testatrix and the latter he claim against the defendant the earl of Suffolk  who though he be not executor or administrator of b his late countess nor have  any legal asset yet as plaintiff insist remain still Chargeable therewith in  equity in respect of a great jointure which he have long enjoy by his lady and  diverse rich jewel which she bring he upon their intermarriage and per Lord  Chan Parker the testatrix intend to make a provision of pound for c and though  she have show her kindness to a yet this no way import a alteration or  diminution of her kindness to c and his lordship say that he can not approve  of the diversity same diversity take arg and thereupon decree in the case of  rider and wager Eq can Abr p can that if the testator give away a debt by his  will and afterward call it in this must be a revocation by if it be pay in to  the testator unasked for for suppose the testator call in that debt fear it  may be lose vide will Rep ford and Fleming accord and Vol Abr Eq and not like  the security be there any reason that this shall deprive the legatee of his  legacy that the case of Orme and smith vern prove that the testator receive  the debt be no revocation or ademption of the legacy as to the release his  lordship say that imply payment and satisfaction of a debt be tantamount to  the testator receive it and give it back again and that in the present case it  be the same as if the will have say if these debt be pay or discharge and as  to a objection that a the plaintiff be administrator to c his sister claim a  double advantage of his debt for first say they it be give he by the release  and then he take it over again by the will as represent c his lordship observe  that his claim as administrator be in auter law vide vern Jason and Jarvis and  will Rep Copping and Copping and as if c be alive and make her claim and that  it will be liable to her debt and be the same thing as if any other person  have be her executor or administrator Trin earl of thomond and earl of Suffolk  will Rep to