c hide v petit Oct S c Charles can Eq can ab Lord keeper I Rainsford ba  Windham award by consent ante case this cause have be many year depend in  court See ante c p post c p decree upon appeal to parliament by petit to be  send back to be reheard upon hear again refer to account before a master upon  hear exception to the master report a order be make by consent of both party  to stand to the award of a and b Jolleis two eminent merchant they several  time attend the Jolleis petit perceive that the Jolleis will condemn he by  their award in pound before the arbitrator have draw up their award petit by  deed under hand and seal revoke the authority give to the arbitrator and  retract the submission however the arbitrator make their award and upon debate  it be hold that the award ought not to be decree in regard of the say  revocation water v tailor Ves Nichols v Chalie Ves king v Joseph taunt but the  court award a attachment milne v Gratrix east Harcourt v Ramsbottom James and  walk against petit unless he show cause and the judge go on this reason that a  authority in its nature be revocable by law though refer by order of court and  a case cite between Norton and roll in the very point where the award be to  have be make by sir Mund Brampston freeman this award can not be decree  because some matter refer be not determine by the award and so not final Pedly  v Goddard t r Selsby v Russell Comberb Reg lib a fol the Lord chancellor  assist by Rainsford and wile I I be of opinion that the award in this case can  not conclude the defendant for that it be but of part of the matter in  difference which be refer and though and case cite ware v sawer child v  Colwell and car Mayers case where by order of court the submission and award  be to be final without appeal or exception that yet the court do allow  exception to the award as against a master report and the word without appeal  or exception but system a clergyman but the court give no opinion in the point  freeman er p it be a abuse of the court in the defendant to retract his  consent after he have attend the preference have first subscribe the consent  under his band yet such a consent give a bare authority only be revocable it  be therefore order that the say award be set aside but a attachment be award  against the defendant for his abuse of the court in retract his consent unless  cause show