case chapman versus tanner eoden die in court Lord keeper Eq can ab pl I pl S  c mortgagor become a bankrupt and the mortgagee refuse to enter and permit the  bankrupt to continue in possession and to fence against a ejectment bring by  the assignee with this mortgage mortgagee shall be charge with the profit from  the time of the ejectment ante case post case a sell land to b who afterward  become a bankrupt part of the purchase money not be pay a shall not be bind to  come in as a creditor under the statute but the land shall stand charge with  the money unpay though no agreement for that purpose a bankrupt before he  become such have make a mortgage of his estate the assignee of the statute  bring a ejectment for recovery of the land comprise in the mortgage the  mortgagee refuse to enter but suffer the bankrupt to take the profit and to  fence against the assignee with this mortgage Lord keeper the mortgagee shall  be charge with the profit from the time of the ejectment deliver this do not  immediate appear in the decree the bankrupt son after his death have get into  possession of the mortgage land and a general account as against he and other  who have get into possession of other land of mesne profit during their  possession be decree r l another point in this case be that the bankrupt have  buy land and all the purchasemoney not be pay the assignee will have have the  vendor come in as a creditor under the statute for the remainder of his  purchasemoney Vernon chancery case per cur in this case there be a natural  equity that the land shall stand charge with so much of the purchasemoney as  be not pay the vendor have some of the deed in his hand say per Lord Camden  Blackburne v Gregson bro Ch Rep the word of the decree in this part be as  follow as to the demand of the say defendant Samuel Trotman the vendor be  pound due upon bind before he deliver up the write in his custody his lordship  declare that a natural equity do arise for he he have the write in his custody  and not be pay his purchasemoney and thereupon do order and decree that the  say defendant Samuel Trotman be pay the say pound with interest and cost at  law out of the say bankrupt estate and that upon payment thereof he deliver up  upon oath to the commissioner all deed c r l and that without any special  agreement for that purpose the vendor have in a schedule to his answer set  forth a listen of several write in his hand belong to the title of the say  estate and which he by his answer swear be by agreement between he and the  bankrupt to remain in his hand until he be pay the sum of pound remain due of  the purchasemoney and for which he have also a bind from the bankrupt n b the  plaintiff have reply to the answer state the aforesaid agreement and the  defendant the vendor have not make any proof of the agreement Reg lib a fol so  where bankrupt article to sell assignee can compel purchaser to pay remainder  of purchasemoney unless title make accord to article orlebar v Fletcher p wms  et vide coppin v coppin p wms and case cite in not there and it seem now the  settle doctrine of the court that equity give the vendor a lie for the price  of the estate sell without any special agreement nairne v prowse Ves at the  roll but such lie may be lose by vendor accept a special security ibidem so  say as to security general per Lord Camden Chan Fawell v Heelis that June Amb  and so hold in the case where vendor receive a note of hand for part and  mortgage for other part bind v ken post vol upon the general principle of  marshal adopt in equity the benefit of the vendor lie may be extend to three  person trim v bayne Ves at the roll et vide powell law of mortgage et seq  Mackreth v simmons Ves Headley v redhead coop and see further as to the vendor  lie Elliott v Edward Bos p Hugh v Kearney Sch l Cowell v Simpson Ves grant v  mill V b ex part Loaring rise ex part peak mad sander v Leslie ba be ex part  park g I winter v anson S S Vernon chancery case er p