case yates against Windham vide ante page and error in person thou may he  bring after the first writ discontinue and error assign and the plaintiff may  assign the same or other error either within or without the record but it must  he enter on the same roll with the first writ Carth   Ent stram ld ray it be  move this term coke show that upon the second writ gubd in person thou to sit  back the plaintiff assign new error sure a discontinuance and that the  judgement be that the defendant sit in misericordid whereas it appear that the  defendant do appear upon the summons to which the defendant in the writ of  error appear and plead that heretofore the plaintiff bring a writ of error  upon this judgement and show all the proceed in it and that this be  discontinue in which none of these error be assign and upon this the plaintiff  demurrer in law coke argue that this writ of error and the error ssi n upon it  can be maintain Fi saint the Dlaintiff can allege diminution toreverse a  record after error assign and to know facias sue upon it nor can the defendant  allege it after in nullo be erratum plead for by it the ecor disaffirmed and  so croak Elizabeth Henry Edward Edward second in a writ of error in person  thou to sit back the plaintiff shall not assign error but in the record remove  and not in the judicial process for the word of the writ be that there be  error in record queen d in person thou to sit back so it be admit that this be  all the record three upon a writ of error gubd in person thou to sit back the  entry be do in form d llegat and so be the precedent Trin Henry allegand  erroresprce a but if these error he overrule he may assign other error within  the record but there be no mention of the former error also this be enter in  another roll and not upon the same roll so that the court may see all together  and so be the course otherwise the court shall not intend it to he the same  cause and the court shall he compel to infinite search which the law will not  allow but the justice say that inasmuch as the first writ be discontinue and  this be a new writ sue the plaintiff be not tie to the former truant ris but  may assign other error at his pleasure for it be now as if no error be assign  heforehand he may assign other error in the record or other error out of the  record and this remove of the residue of the record in this manner be well  Allowable I and these error may be well assign and as to these point they be  satisfy but for the entry of it upon another roll they doubt old woman will  advice and afterward for this cause it be hold a misentry and the plaintiff  put to a new writ of error