case tailor versus johnson at the roll mos Eq can ab pl a by will devise pound  to his infant grandson without appoint time for payment with proviso that if  the grandson die before twentyone then the legacy to go over   b the grandson  shall have the interest of the legacy during his infancy a man by will devise  pound to his infant grandson without mention anytime of payment with a proviso  that if the grandson shall die before twentyone then the legacy to go over to  another the question be whether the grandson shall during his infancy be  entitle to the of this pound legacy object until this contingency have happen  non constat whether the infant will ever be entitle to the pound and  consequent he can have no interest for that legacy which never may become due  Payable or vest until the contingency be over interest be only due in default  of payment and this legacy not be Payable till the grandson age of twentyone  ought not to carry interest it be the same thing m if peer William a legacy be  give to be pay at the legatee age of twentyone and though the legacy be to a  grandson that be not material in regard the grandfather be not bind to  maintain the grandson and accord equity will not supply the want of a peer  William er p surrender in case of the devise of a copyhold to a grandson as  have be adjudge by the lord upon a appeal in the case of kettle versus  townsend salk but see the case of Watts versus Papal bull vol and the note  thereto subjoin indeed if it be the case of a legacy to a son who have nothing  else this court may perhaps give interest for the son subsistence because the  father be oblige to maintain he Mr Lutwyche contra the legacy of pound to the  infant grandson if no time be mention for the payment will by construction of  law be Payable present and equity of course allow interest from the end of the  year if to a son from the death of the testator for his maintenance and though  there be a condition to make the legacy void on the legatee die before  twentyone yet this be a subsequent condition and if the contingency of his  death happen it become void from that time only on the other hand if the  contingency never happen it be as if none have ever be annex to the legacy and  then the legacy must carry interest at least from the end of the year after  the death of the testator if instead of a legacy the testator have devise land  to the grandson be a infant to be void as here if the infant shall die before  the age of twentyone the grandson will have have the profit of the land until  his death though he have die before twentyone and there be the same reason  that the infant in the present case shall have the profit or interest of the  money until the contingency happen and this very case have often be determine  by the court peer William master of the roll it be extreme clear that this be  a condition subsequent and therefore as the infant death before twentyone will  only defeat the legacy from the time it happen consequent in the mean time it  shall carry interest at least from the end of the year after the death of the  testator Reg lib b fol by the name of tailor v guest by where the legacy be  contingent Shawe v Cunliffe bro c c Descrambes v Tomkins bro c c n Cox  Glanville v Glanville mere as to the case where interest on a contingent  legacy will be give in the shape of maintenance see note toHarvey v Harvey  ante or where though vest it do not carry interest heath v very atk Crickett v  dolby Ves Ellis v Ellis Sch l so Studholme v Hodgson post vol note Montgomery  v Woodley Ves Lambert v Parker coop as to the bequest of a residue vide  Nicholls v Osborne ante