case oat lessee of sir William joule versus Robinson Lord Macclesfield Str  where cognizee of a statute extend land in one county which extent be  afterward return and file yet all the land of the cognizor though in other  county shall be make liable upon application in chancery sir William Wolesley  acknowledge a statutestaple before the chief justice of the common plea to sir  William Jolliff for pound to be pay at Candlemas then next peer William on  this statutestaple a extent be sue out direct to the sheriff of Staffordshire  by virtue of which and of a inquisition take thereon the say sheriff extend  diverse land of the cognizor in Staffordshire and this extent be return and  file in the pettybag office afterward sir William Jolliff sue out another  extent upon this statutestaple direct to the sheriff of Nottinghamshire who  upon inquisition extend other land and thereupon a liberate be sue out and  return and sir William Jolliff bring a ejectment upon which there be a full  and perfect extent before and the same be file it be hold that this be a  satisfaction and no new extent can be afterward make peer William er p upon  the same statute and it be say to be the folly of the cognizee to file his  extent until he know he have land sufficient for which be cite the follow  authority Inst vent hob Forster versus Jackson stat h cap cro James lev roll  Rep Godbolt Bulstrode lev cro Elizabeth but on a petition to Lord chancellor  his lordship give leave that a special prayer shall be enter upon the record  of extent show that the cognizor of the statute sir William Wolesley die seize  in fee of several land in several county videlicet in Staffordshire  Nottinghamshire c and pray that the cognizee sir William Jolliff may be at  liberty to sue out extent upon the land in all these county peer William and  his lordship say he will give the cognizee of the statute liberty to enter  upon the record what prayer he please for that the intention and agreement of  the cognizor who give this security be that all his land be they in ever so  many county shall be bind by the statute and consequent it will be most  unreasonable to confine the cognizee to the land of the cognizor in any one  county for this will be to defeat that security which the party himself have  agree to give and have actual give see the stat g c S and note to Underhill v  Devereux William sander c d whereupon this special prayer be enter and the  cognizee recover the land in Nottinghamshire notwithstanding his former extent  file of the land in Staffordshire and though afterward there be another  petition prefer to set aside this order insist that the defendant against who  the ejectment be bring for the land in Nottinghamshire be a mortgagee and  without notice though subsequent to the statute yet his lordship affirm the  first order with great clearness save that the law be rather nice upon a  elegit on a judgement because of the word elegit but that this word be not  make use of in a extent and have it not be insist on that the defendant be  poor and a honest creditor of the cognizor the court be inclinable to have  give cost upon the second petition