Barnardiston king b full and Josling executor of lady Twisden vide ante this  matter now come on again it be insist by the defendant counsel that letter of  attorney to enter up judgement be bare naked authority not couple with a  interest and to this purpose they cite Ven in point and the consequence of  this they say be that the present one must determine by the death of the party  they do allow that the case of oat and uvoodward be pretty strong against they  but yet they observe that two case in salk and may be cite in answer to that  authority where it be hold that a warrant of attorney to confess a judgement  give by a feme sole be countermand by her marry beside it be say that in the  case of oat and uvoodward the judgement be set aside for another irregularity  for not bring in the record before the essoinday of the subsequent term and  therefore it be not necessary in that case to have determine the other point  but Mr reeves and Mr Filmer on the other side argue and not only rely upon the  case of oat and uvoodward but cite the case of sir John parson and hill mich  will as be very material for they the defendant die there in the vacation  after judgement a writ of execution be take out immediate after his death test  of the precedent term when he be live on motion to set aside this execution  the court hold it to be regular and that there be no occasion for a to know  facias to revive the judgement accord in the present case the court hold the  judgement to be regular they declare that by the course of the court all  matter enter up of any part of a term or of a vacation follow shall have  relation to the first day of the term and therefore by the record the  judgement in the present case appear to be a judgement when lady Twisden be  live a warrant of attorney to confess a judgement be undoubted revocable in  itself either by the act of the law or by the act of the party but by the  record judgement appear to have be give while the authority be subsist the  chief justice observe too that the case of oat and uvoodward be a full  authority to this purpose for he say he well remember that the court clear  give their opinion upon that point which relate to the present case before the  other matter be stir and as to the case cite out of Salkeld that a warrant of  attorney give by a feme sole to confess a judgement be countermand by her  marriage he say he take they not to be law in such case where by the course of  the court judgement can be enter up so as to be a judgement at the time when  she be sole accord upon the whole matter the court refuse to set aside the  judgement Barnardiston king b term hill geo two