case beak and other against ken Trinity term will mary roll in assumpsit  against a executor if the defendant plead several judgement recover and no  asset ultra and the plaintiff reply per fraud to each judgement separate the  plaintiff may rejoin general that the say judgement be not keep on foot by  fraud and need not traverse each judgement separate SC show SC Carth SC holt  Indebitatus assumpsit bring against a executor c for ware sell the defendant  plead several judgement c and that he have no asset ultra modern the plaintiff  reply particular to each judgement and that they be keep on foot by fraud the  defendant in his rejoinder put all the judgement together and say they be not  keep on foot by fraud the plaintiff demurrer the question be whether the  defendant shall have make several rejoinder to all the judgement in particular  and not have put they all together like the case of workhouse v SymondsCro  James roll Abr a which be a indebitatus assumpsit for fee the defendant plead  several judgement as here c and the plaintiff make the like replication their  the defendant rejoin and say that the judgement be all satisfy and that he do  not keep seperalia judge prediction on foot by fraud and have leave out nec  some the dawn and upon a demurrer judgement be give for the plaintiff in the  court of common plea which be affirm upon a writ of error bring in the king  bench curian the plaintiff need not aver in his replication that every  judgement but that separalia judge prediction be keep on foot by fraud which  have be a good averment and their this rejoinder have be likewise good if the  jury have find but one judgement keep on foot by fraud there must have be a  verdict for the plaintiff because sufficient matter of the issue will be then  find for he for it be enough if the substance entitle the plaintiff to a  action and avoid the defendant plea as in the case of Robsert v AndrewsCro  Elizabeth b waste be bring against the defendant for cut of twenty oak the  defendant ought to plead that he do not cut the twenty oak or any of they but  if air action of debt have be bring on a bind condition that the obligor shall  not do waste and the breach assign that he do cut twenty oak it be sufficient  to say that he do not cut the say twenty oak modus et form c for if it be find  that he cut one oak it be enough to forfeit the obligation so in a to know  facias upon a judgement against tertenants who plead several plead and the  plaintiff reply quoad separalia placita c without say quoad placitum of the  one and so of the other particular for the word separalia placita shall refer  to each plea reddendo one one it be state by Carthew that the plaintiff  perceive the opinion of the court to be that the rejoinder be good obtain  leave to discontinue S c Carth S c holt a