caveat the lady Willoughby wife to the late sir Francis Willoughby sue in the  chancery as administratrix of her say husband against Percivall Willoughby  which have marry one of the daughter of the say sir Francis and the defendant  plead that before any administration commit to the say plaintiff he himself  put in a caveat in the spiritual court hang which caveat she bath attain these  letter of administration whereby the defendant bath appeal the which appeal be  not yet determine for which he demand judgement if hang this appeal the say  plaintiff shall be receive to sue in this be court as administratrix and it  seem to Egerton then Lord keeper of the great seal that the defendant plea be  good to stay the suit until the appeal be determine but not to be dismiss out  of the court no more than a excommunication and he say there be difference  between a appeal in spiritual law and a writ of error in our law for by the  purchase of a writ of error the judgement be not impeach until the record be  rehearse but the very bring of a appeal be a suspension of the first judgement  in the spiritual court for the principal matter but not for the cost and for  to prove that he cite r quare hinder vide h Gaud pound m dyer Elizabeth  Gouldsborough report execution upon a extent of a remainder in the chancery a  special verdict be return upon a extent and the case be this that there be  tenant for life the remainder in tail and the tenant in remainder in tail make  a statute staple and after grant his remainder and after the tenant for life  die and the grantee of the remainder enter and whether execution shall be sue  of this land upon the say statute insomuch that the say land be never in  demean in the hand of the conusor and so not extendable in his hand be the  question and sir Thomas Egerton Lord keeper of the great seal say that before  that time there have be a difference take between a remainder and a reversion  depend upon a estate for life for to a remainder be no service due nor  incident and for that it be term seck but a reversion have service incident  and those may be extend and by consequence the reversion when it commethin  possession but it seem unto he that all be one for one may charge a remainder  when it happen as well as a reversion and a statute be in the nature of a  charge cook the queen attorney say there be no question in the case for albeit  there be some scruple make in h b yet the case be without question for if he  in the remainder make a lease for year to commence at a day to come yet if be  grant over his remainder the grantee shall hold that charge with his lease and  every statute be a charge executory by which the say Lord keeper award that  there shall be a liberate make to the conusee upon the return above