case edge against Salisbury and other April such of my near relation as my  executor shall think the great object of charity hold to extend only to such  as will take under the statute of distribution endless to find out more  distant relation vide Jones v beal for that child of brother and sister be let  in to receive a share in the lifetime of their parent Reg lib a foe S c Ves  Samuel edge by will devise pound in manner follow videlicet I give and  bequeathe unto and I hereby order and direct my executor to pay out of the  residue and rest of my estate the sum of pound to and among such of my near  relation of the family of edge as my executor shall think the great object of  charity in such manner and in such proportion as my executor and the survivor  and survivor of they shall think fit and I do hereby desire that my executor  will take the advice and direction of my say sister Salisbury in the  distribution thereof ambler bill by plaintiff as first cousin of the testator  and proper object of the testator charity against the defendant who be his  nephew and niece to be pay their proportion of the pound Lord Hardwicke c I  will not construe the intention to extend further than to the near relation  such as will take under the statute of distribution otherwise it will be  endless to tend out every body that be relation the plaintiff attempt to read  evidence that the testator mean to comprehend they but his lordship refuse it  because he say it will be to construe word which of themselves carry a meaning  see Dowsett v sweet post parole evidence be admit to prove that the testator  in conversation with the defendant Salisbury be inform that the plaintiff be  his relation and his lordship say it have be receive in the case of a  uncertain description of the person as by a wrong name to show that the person  intend to be describe by the testator be know to he by such a nickname bill  dismiss Mr wragg of counsel for plaintiff cite the case of attorneygeneral v  Buckland that June before Lord Hardwicke who say that where a gift be give to  relation it be to be confine to the next of kin but where it be give to poor  relation the construction have be more large and extend to those that be of  kin and object of charity Thomas v hold Cas in Eq in Lord Talbot time wms anon  Prec in Ch roach v Hammond cross v Clare that April in Ch post Whitehorn v  Harris Ves so also where a devise be to relation roach v Hammond Ch Prec green  v Howard bro c c Crawys v Coleman Ves anon p W Brandon v Brandon Swanst and  see Ves so a devise to person relate to I Rayner v Mowbray bro c c to each of  my relation by blood or marriage Devismas v Mellish Ves to poor or most  necessitous relation Isaac v Defriey post but see same for l r there Widmore v  woodroof post Sugd pow Brunsden v Woolridge post anon p wms and see Gower v  Mainwaring Ves mahon v savage Sch Lef in smith v Campbell Ves a devise to near  relation be confine to brother and sister see Swanst general if the testator  have mark a intention to extend the meaning of the word relation further than  the stat of distribution the court will so decree Bennet v honeywood post  Worseley v Johnson atk so likewise the will be the guide as to the proportion  and share into which the fund be to be divide on distribution Thomas v hold  can t Talb green v Howard ambler er p bro c c butler v strahan bro c c Wimbli  v pitcher Ves but see master v Hooper bro c c under a devise to relation with  a power of selection as to such relation as a shall think fit or think most  deserve a be not confine to select from such relation only as be within the  stat of distribution Harding v Glynn atk give more correct in brown v Higgs  Ves supple v Lawson post mahon v savage Sch Lef spring v riles t r note f S c  Sch Lef note a Forbes v ball Meriv but see Brunsden v Woolridge post if in  such case the power be not exercise the fund will go to the next of kin at the  death of the party who have the power Crawy v Coleman Ves Harding v Glynn atk  but see attorneygeneral v Bucknall infra note to this case but where a power  of apportionment only among relation and not of selection be give the  appointment unjust be among those only who be within the stat of distribution  pope v Whitcombe mere and in default of appointment in this case the fund go  to the next of kin at the death of the testator it as it do general where the  enjoyment of the fund be postpone to a future period Martin v Hooper bro c c  Rayner v Mowbray bro c c do v Lawson east in hark ms capper this part of the  judgement run as follow Lord chancellor I can admit evidence as to the  testator instruction to the person make his will or the testator declaration  about the construction of the clause in his will but evidence may be read to  show the testator know he have poor relation as if a person be misname in a  will parole evidence may be give to show who the person be the testator mean  this cause come on to be hear at the same time with the cause of Gooderige v  Gooderige which be report Ves in the last name cause it be declare that the  next of kin of the testator of the family of the edge who will have be entitle  to the distributive share of his personal estate within the statute of  distribution in case he have die intestate ought to be consider as mean and  intend by the description of the near relation in the bequest in question and  that the defendant the executor with the advice of mrs Salisbury have the  power of judge which of such person be the great object of charity lr see also  belt supply to Ves d edit where the decree be correct give at length from lib  Reg the follow account of the case of attorneygeneral v Buckland be extract  from the register book James ware who be a merchant employ Samuel bishop his  nephew as his bookkeeper by his will he devise away the bulk of his property  to bishop two day before his death he order bishop to fetch from his count  house a parcel of south sea bind and his waste book he then give he south sea  bind of pound each tell he he intend it to enable he to assist his poor  relation at the same time a entry be make in the waste book in the follow word  that June profit and loss debtor to pound south sea bind give to S bishop to  dispose of accord to my direction to he witness my band James ware bishop  afterward make a entry of the transaction in the journal and a double entry in  the ledger and after the death of ware sell the south sea bind and invest the  money in east India stock in bishop die and appoint the defendant his executor  the decree declare the gift of the pound south sea bind be a gift of principal  and interest for the benefit of James ware be pen relation and direct a  account to be take of the interest accrue due on the same since ware be death  or which may have accrue due if bishop have not dispose of the same the master  to certify what poor relation of the testator be live at the time of his death  also which of the relation of the say James ware as be live at his death have  since become poor