case BANYSTER against trussel a person attaint of felony can plead his  attainder in bar to a personal action for he be equal liable to answer civil  as if he be not attaint say vide ante croak Elizabeth er p and latch Jones  more Owen Leon stand Inst hawk salk ld raym Peer will by Rep will foster dougl  term Rep c b debt upon a obligation the defendant plead that he be attaint of  felony which attainder continue yet in its force and demand judgement if he  shall he put to answer and it be thereupon demurrer Walmsle hold that it be a  good plea and that he shall not he put to answer and so be all the authority  in the yearbooks Edward pl Edward pl Edward pl Henry pl Stamford be that he  shall not he put during that time to answer to another felony for he can  forfeit more than he have forfeit before and Britton say that a felon attaint  shall not answer to any thing unless to a great felony there be no authority  in our book against it and these authority be ground upon good reason for  there be a rule the law will not make a man to labour in vain and it will be  in vain for one to sue and in the end not to enjoy the effect of his suit  videlicet execution which he can have of his land because they be now the lord  nor of his body or good for they belong to the queen wherefore during that  time all obligation and contract betwixt he and other be dissolve and he may  he resemble to a man who enter into religion or to a femecovert who can be sue  without her baron to who she have give her body Anderson Heaumond and owel d  contra for in all the authority which be vouch there be not any judgement or  settle opinion wherefore the law be to he examine how it stand and in truth  there be more and great reason to maintain that he shall he put to answer than  otherwise for the other construction will he very mischievous the principal  reason pretend against it be because the queen have a interest in his body and  in all that he have and may cause he to he execute when she will but that be  not any cause to stop the plaintiff in his proceed for he may proceed and have  judgement against he and if he shall he at large take his body in execution  and yet the queen when she please may command execution to he do on his body  notwithstanding the party execution there be a rule that none shall take  advantage de sontort demesne and there be not any difference betwixt this case  and where one be outlaw in debt or trespass for then the queen may have his  body in prison and his good as forfeit and he be disable to sue any man but  yet it be not to he doubt but that he shall answer to the suit of any other it  be object that his body be not his own during this attainder but that be not  so croak Elizabeth for he may purchase any land and if there he any personal  wrong do to he when he be pardon he may have his action for it the case of a  JeTecovert be not like hereto for that be to avoid the intolerable mischief  which otherwise will happen to her husband it be not reasonable that a man do  a wrong shall takeadvantage thereof to himself and take away another man  action and therefore it be fit he shall he put to answer for the queen and  plaintiff may he both serve the queen by execute he when she please the  plaintiff in the interim to have in execution and therefore Owen say it be  adjudge in the exchequer in one Crofts case where one have a judgement against  another in debt who be afterward attaint of felony and imprison at Newgate  during that time the plaintiff pursue a capias ad to give satisfaction and  deliver it to the sheriff of London the felon be afterward pardon and let  large and the party thereupon bring debt upon the escape and adjudge  maintainable which prove that he may he take in execution during the attainder  send oucere if it be not adjudge because he be in their custody after the  pardoii shall then he say to he in execution for the party wherefore upon  these reason against the opinion of Walmsley it be adjudge that he shall  answer vide   entry croak Elizabeth er p