c VERDALL all v harvey Feb car S c Nels Lord keeper Coventry injunction from  the exchequer to the chancery the same day that the plaintiff cause be to be  hear in chancery the defendant cause the plaintiff counsel in westminsterhall  as the be go to the chancery bar to be serve with a injunction out of the  exchequer to stay the suit which the plaintiff counsel declare to the court  whereupon counsel not attend a far day be appoint and the defendant order to  attend then which accord he do and by the declaration of the plaintiff S  counsel and the defendant not deny it the case upon the injunction be as  aforesaid the court appoint two several order make by chancellor Elsmere to be  read by one of which it appear that a officer of the customhouse be serve with  subpnas to answer bill there will not answer thereunto but procure a  injunction out of the exchequer and serve it order there that the plaintiff  may proceed notwithstanding the say injunction and by another commit for the  contempt of this court and the Lord keeper declare that so it may be do in  this case but will hear the defendant counsel and that upon hear the cause it  may be dismiss or retain as be just and he ask the defendant if he will wave  the injunction and proceed in the cause to which he answer that he have no  counsel and desire time to advice the court be Willing that his counsel shall  be hear if also the plaintiff counsel may be hear freeman which the defendant  refuse pretend he be not able to wave the injunction which the court deny  since it be his own suit but the defendant still refuse the court order the  plaintiff counsel to open the cause which be do accord and the defendant allow  another day for his counsel to defend so that the matter of this cause may be  free debate on both side which the defendant refuse whereupon the Lord  Coventry declare that the court will not give way to this injunction for if it  be pretend that the defendant be a receiver of the exchequer that have be  overrule by multitude of precedent upon great deliberation in the time of the  Lord Bacon sir Thomas Bromle and Elsmere and other chancellor and keeper and  since his lordship be keeper upon the precedent and upon conference with chief  baron Walter and the rest of the Barons Tyke v clarke tooth cut v Peter ibidem  Matthew v Lord Arundel ibidem