case Carleton against MORTAGH Michaelmas term whether roll if want of a  original be assign for error and a release be plead yet a certiorari to inform  the court whether there be any original or not may be award in the same manner  as if in nullo be erratum have be plead but the party can demand it of right S  c post S c salk S c salk S c holt want of a original be assign for error and a  release of error plead the doubt be whether the court after a release of error  plead in this case may award a certiorari ad to shape knowledge Curi to be  certify if there be a original to support a judgement for a just debt and it  be agree that the party can not demand it of right after this plea a diversity  be endeavour at that where the party himself express confess or admit a thing  the court ought not to desire any further information but that where the  admittance be not express but imply or by nient to dedicate it be otherwise  against which holt chief justice put this case in annuity riens arriere be  plead the jury find that there be no rend behind and it appear to they that  there be no grant yet they can find a non to go away contrary to the  admittance of the party and he say if error be assign which in truth be no  error and the defendant plead a release of error which be find against he yet  the error assign be bad judgement shall be affirm because the issue take upon  the release be impertinent Powell justice quote the yearbook roll Abr cro  James Jones bro Abr error yearbook Edward pl Edward pl Edward pl Edward pl a  that upon a release of error if it be find against the defendant yet the court  shall proceed to examine the judgement but if it be find for the defendant the  judgement shall be to bar the plaintiff of his writ but if there be no error  at all and the release be find against he the judgement shall be affirm and it  be put in the paper to be speak to solemnly at another day ware quote the  authority in the margin by Littleton justice in the case of moil v Danby  Edward pl a which be all upon the same opinion with the yearbook before quote  by Powell justice Edward pl b and be move again the last day of term holt  chief justice say that if the plaintiff in error assign that for error  particular which be not so or the general error and the defendant plead not in  nullo be modern erratum but a release which be either insufficient plead or if  well plead upon issue find against he there the court ought not to reverse the  judgement without examine if the error be good now why shall not we have a  certiorari ad to shape knowledge though the party of right can demand it  bishop case   Jones c suppose want of original be assign for error and it be  return that there be no original of that term the defendant in error if there  be a original of another term ought to modern er p make such a suggestion on  the roll of a original of another term for if he plead in nullo be erratum he  be thereby conclude from make such a suggestion yet the court may award a  certiorari because there may be a original of another term say Adjournatur  till next termSee this case move again post where it be determine by three  judge against the opinion of holt chief justice that the court may in this  case grant a certiorari to inform the conscience of the court and by S c ld  ray the writ be afterward grant accord d