ambler case wilcocks against wilcocks court will not order perishable good  take under a sequestration for want of a answer to be sell before decree lib  Reg b foe b at the roll that July the defendant be prosecute to a  sequestration for want of a answer and the sequestrator have take eleven  hogshead of cyder and other perishable come ambler er p modities the plaintiff  petition to have they sell but the court refuse to do it till hear of the  cause and order the petition to come on at the same time with the cause and  now they come on to be hear together and the bill be take pro acknowledged  admitted fact against the defendant and the cyder and other perishable good be  order to be sell by auction and the money to be pay into the bank subject to  the further order of the court the petition state that part of the effect  consist of live cattle be attend with expense in care and feed and  preservation thereof and other part be in their nature perishable daily grow  worse and pray that they may therefore be sell the word of the order be the  great part of the good and effect take by the say sequestrator consist of  perishable stock and effect his honour do order that the same be sell after  give a fortnight notice in the Exeter journal thereof and the money after  reasonable expense deduct to be ascertain by affidavit of the sequestrator and  to be pay into the bank to the credit of this cause from the above extract  from l r it will appear that although the application extend to cattle as well  as to perishable good yet that the order be confine to perishable good in hale  v Shafto bro c c a motion for sale of good sequester on mesne propess be  refuse so also in knight v young v b in Maynard v pomfret atk cite Ves it  appear to have be grant on consent but it seem very questionable whether a  sequestration ought to be execute at all on mesne process see Mr dickens  reason on the case of Rowley v Ridley dick simmonds v Kinnaird Ves Wharam v  Broughton Ves after a decree the court will order the sale of perishable  commodity shaw v wright Ves but it will seem that the motion for such sale  shall be make upon notice Mitchell v draper Ves