anonymous a covenant in a settlement that the land so limit in jointure shall  for ever continue of a certain yearly value will extend to all the estate  raise in those land by the settlement if any other land be mention therein  particular if the first estate be limit to the husband if no other land be  mention therein it must perhaps be confine to the estate of the wife covenant  the plaintiff declare upon a indenture of settlement upon marriage by which  the father settle certain land to the use of I S for four year and afterward  to the use of the son for life and then to the daughter for life and then to  the first second c son of their two body in tail c and the father covenant  that the land so limit in jointure after the expiration of the four year shall  be and for ever continue of the annual value of per annum and the breach be  assign that the land be not of such value this action be bring by the son  against the executor who demurrer to the declaration and Mr ware take  exception that this covenant do but extend to the estate for life limit to the  wife for her jointure and then the son can have a action for the word estate  so limit in jointure restrain it to this estate only and the security must be  intend to have be for the benefit of the wife only to the end that she may be  certain of a jointure of such a value and it can be intend that the father  mean to oblige himself to secure it to his son and he cite hob sand Alleyn  Ventr case where covenant be restrain by the intent of the party that the word  for ever continue can be construe to make a perpetual covenant but must have  some restriction and that which he have mention seem to be the most proper and  that if this construction be not make the word so limit in jointure will be  idle and of no effect for it do not appear that there be any other land  comprise in the deed but Northey for the plaintiff argue that the covenant be  that after the four year the land shall be and continue for ever c now the son  have by the limitation of the deed the next immediate estate after the four  year expire if this covenant be not construe to extend to he it will be  destroy since his estate commence immediate Lord Raymond upon the expiration  of the four year which holt chief justice grant and say that the word land so  limit in jointure be only a description of the land to which the covenant  shall extend and it be advantageous to the wife that the land shall be of such  value to the son of her husband for she may live in a more plentiful manner  and as to the objection that the word will be idle and of no effect he answer  that notwithstanding any thing to the contrary appear to the court there may  be other land mention in the deed and if the defendant will have take  advantage of this exception he shall have pray oyer of the deed to the end  that it may have appear that there be no other land comprise for the plaintiff  have no need to show more of the deed in his declaration than concern his case  and as to the extensiveness of the covenant he take this difference that it  will extend to all estate raise by the deed as if h limit a estate to a for  life remainder to b for life remainder to the first second c son of their two  body remainder to his own right heir with such a covenant annex to it it will  extend to the estate for life and the estate tail but if for default of issue  of the body of a and b the reversion descend to the collateral or lineal heir  of h he shall never take advantage of it because he be not privy to the  consideration of the deed nor party to the deed a nor be his estate raise by  the deed but if in such case the remainder have be limit to the right heir of  a or b or of I S they may sue upon this covenant because they have take by the  limitation of the deed and be privy to it judgement be give for the plaintiff  by the whole court ex relation mri Jacob a vide Bl Com Lord Raymond er p