case roam against SKILLICORNE in chancery Nov devise of real estate to trustee  to sell and pay debt and legacy general trustee sell and embezzle part of the  money the purchaser not liable to the debt see Mr butler note xiv to   Litt b  and the case of Jebb v abbot and Beynon v Collins cite there Sugd vend see  Langley v Lord Oxford ante lib Reg b foe Joseph mason surrender his copyhold  and devise his real estate to trustee to sell and pay his own and his father  debt and legacy the residue to his two sister Hester and Elizabeth No  particular debt be specify in the will but legacy to the residuary devisee and  other to a considerable amount be give by both of their will the trustee sell  great part of the estate and embezzle the money without discharge the debt and  legacy the rest of the estate be possess by one of the residuary devisees bill  by plaintiff as purchaser of several part to be indemnified against the debt  and legacy by the estate remain unsold which be pray by the bill to be sell  for that purpose ambler Lord chancellor where there be a trust or devise for  payment of debt general a purchaser be not oblige to see to the application of  his money as he be where there be a schedule or particularize of the debt in  this case the subject the estate to the payment of legacy will not make the  purchaser answerable for the disposition of the money because the legacy can  be pay without the debt and they be not specify the above general rule have a  exception where there be a collusion between the purchaser and the trustee or  executor see hill v Simpson Ves mcleod v Drummond Ves S c Ves nugent v Gifford  Ves sen Adair v shaw I Sch Lef see Watkins v cheek S S Barnard atk I shall  have dismiss the plaintiff bill with cost if the defendant have make the  proper defence but instead of insist on the above rule they have in their  answer insinuate that the plaintiff be liable and indirect threaten to sue  they for the legacy due to they and suggest collusion between plaintiff and  the trustee that the sale be make when the other residuary devisee be a infant  which tend to foment dispute therefore decree plaintiff to hold and enjoy  against the defendant and all person claim or to claim the say several estate  or premise or any of they No cost give on either side lib Reg Kemble v bill Eq  can Abr pl ex part turner Mod Hardwicke v mind I Anstr Williamson v Curtis bro  Barker v duke of Devonshire mor Ithell v bean Ves sen keane v Robert mad abbot  v Gibbs Eq can Abr pl smith v Gaynon bro c c Dunch v ken vern Spalding v  Shalmer vern Cotterel v Hampson vern butler note xiv   light b Burke v Rakeby  mad Rep v Elliot v Merryman a estate charge with debt not liable in hand of  purchaser unless debt specify no more than estate devise to be sell walker v  Smallwood post see Ves jun n Sugd vend ambler er p