case cross against FAUSTENDITCH Hilary term James roll a covenant in  consideration of natural affection to convey before easter in trust for  himself for life with remainder over and also to stand seize from and after  easter of such land as shall not be sufficient convey before to the several  use mention no estate at all be execute before easter extend to all the land  Noy roll Abr   blow side Owen Leon pale yellow use lev Cowp dougl Com dig Com  dig Bac Abr if a man covenant in consideration of natural affection with a  power to make lease a lease to a stranger be void a settlement make for a good  consideration as for the provision of child will if make with power of  revocation in the seller be void by the Elizabeth c against a purchaser for a  valuable consideration a lease on which rend be reserve be a revocation of a  voluntary conveyance within Elizabeth c ejectment of a lease from John elm  upon not guilty plead the jury find a special verdict videlicet that Edward  elm father of the lessor be seize in fee and in Elizabeth covenant by  indenture in consideration of love to his old son and for the settle his land  in his name and blood and accord to the estate proviso and limitation therein  mention that he will before easter convey his land to Edward Apsley and other  to the use of himself for life the remainder tG his say son the lessor in tail  with diverse remainder over the remainder to his right heir and that all  estate make shall be to the use and under the proviso afterward mention with a  proviso that he may make lease for twentyone year of any part thereof and that  the conveyance shall be to the use of the lessee with a proviso that he may  revoke all the use and estate by any his write or will he also covenant that  he will stand seize from and after easter of so much of the say land which  shall not be sufficient convey to the say several use intent and purpose they  find that before easter no assurance be make accord to the indenture and that  in Elizabeth for thirty pound pay he by indenture demise to the defendant for  twentyone year and find the clause of the statute of Elizabeth c that if one  make a conveyance with clause of revocation and afterward for consideration of  money or for other consideration croak James er p bargain sell demise or grant  the say land to a stranger the say conveyance shall be void and revoke c they  further find that Edward elm die that John elm enter and let to the plaintiff  upon who the defendant reenter et si c first it be resolve without argument  that the use and estate raise by the covenant in this indenture be make in  consideration of love to his son and no estate at all be execute before croak  throw easter the covenant extend to all although it be object that the word be  that of so much of the say land as shall not be sufficient convey he will  stand c the intent be that he will stand seize when part be convey and  sufficient execute but when no part be execute it be not his intent that all  shall he raise by covenant say non allocatur for the consideration be  sufficient the covenant well extend to all there be nothing convey by the  estate execute second it be resolve that the estate be not execute the use  rise by covenant only the proviso to make lease be void for the lessee be  stranger to the consideration of blood and therefore can take benefit of any  such estate thereby and the father have not any authority to make lease vide  mildmay case   and Lord paget case ibidem three which be the principal  question when Edward elm who be but tenant for life by this conveyance with  power of revocation make a lease for twentyone year which may have have his  determination during his life it be make in consideration of money pay whether  that shall be say to be a lease derive out of the estate for life only or  whether the lessee shall have benefit of the statute of Elizabeth c that this  voluntary and revocable conveyance shall be say to be void and revoke quoad  the lessee be the doubt and it be hold by all the justice that this lease  shall be good and absolute and not be impeach by the former but he who make it  have power to revoke it the law shall construe it as revoke and void quoad the  lessee and that he be as tenant in fee when he make that lease for it be  express within the word and intent of the statute of Elizabeth c this lease be  make in consideration of a fine pay and it be say at the bar that in hind v  Collins a it be resolve in this court that where one have make such a  conveyance and have make a lease reserve rend without other consideration that  it be sufficient and a revocation of the first estate quoad that lease and  because none of the plaintiff part have argue they give further day et  adjournatur