c bullock v knight S c Ch can S c Ch can trust of a term limit William bullock  possess of a term for year upon the marriage of Henry his son with Bridget the  daughter of sir John knight grant this term to sir John freeman er p knight in  trust for William until the marriage and then for Henry during his life and no  long and after his death for Bridget during her life and no long and after  their decease then to the issue of their two body to descend in nature of a  special entail so long as they continue in a thing naturan and for default of  such issue then in trust for the executor of Henry during the remainder of the  say term the marriage take effect and they have issue Henry assign all his  estate and interest c to the defendant plaintiff and then die and Bridget and  the issue die and the plaintiff defendant take out letter of administration to  Bridget and to the issue and the question be which of they have the best right  to the remainder of this term on the plaintiff defendant part it be urge that  if the issue take any estate in this trust that then he have a good title a  see administrator to the issue for if he take any thing he take all and the  remainder over to the executor of Henry be void and if the issue can take  nothing but the limitation to they be void then the trust of the whole residue  of the term be vest in Bridget by survivorship and then the plaintiff  defendant have a title as be administrator to Bridget freeman for the  defendant plaintiff it be urge that the issue can take nothing but the  limitation be void for issue shall not take by way of purchase in this case  but shall be take as word of limitation and that way the issue can take for  that will be to make a entail of a term therefore if a trust of a term for  year be limit to a and his issue the whole term vest in a lion v Mitchell I  mad Tothill v Pitt ibidem but though a term en gros can be entail a term  attendant may in effect see last case then admit that the issue take nothing  then the trust of the whole term be vest in Bridget by survivorship and then  although the husband can not dispose of so much of the term as be limit to her  for her life upon the marriage settlement yet this residue which vest in her  by survivorship the husband may well dispose of the Lord chancellor say this  be a new case and he will consider of it It appear by the report in Ch can  where above but his lordship eventual decide for the defendant and see Reg lib  as cite infra Reg lib a fol the court declare that the term vest in the issue  and upon this ground the defendant plea be allow but without cost and the  plaintiff bill dismiss