article on marriage to settle land on the husband and wife for their life  remainder to the first c son of the marriage remainder to the heir male of the  body of the husband by any wife remainder to the heir of the body of the  husband by the first wife remainder to the husband in fee with provision for  the daughter of the first marriage if no son the husband have one daughter by  the first wife suffer a recovery and marry a second wife and take notice of  the first marriage article in his second marriage settlement the daughter by  the first marriage bar this recovery Trin Powell and price et all et econt in  chess will Rep I S devise all his land to a and his heir to the use of a and  his heir in trust to pay debt and then in trust for b and the heir of her body  late plaintiff wife remainder to a and his right heir upon condition that he  marry b and give a his personal estate in trust for b until she shall attain  twentyone and make a executor and then die b refuse to marry a and marry c and  afterward at equity case abridge her age of twentyone she and her husband make  a bargain and sale to d in order to suffer a recovery in which she and her  husband be vouch and the use thereof be declare to the issue of the marriage  remainder to her own right heir the condition of the devise of the remainder  in fee to a be dispense with by the lady be refusal but then that remainder be  well bar by the recovery suffer by b and her husband hill Geo sir John  Robinson and comens case in Eq tempt Talbot his lordship take notice that it  have be say that a legal and a equitable interest can be incorporate together  but his lordship say that objection can not affect this case for though the  legal and equitable estate can be incorporate together yet I S have not limit  a equitable estate first and then the legal estate but have at first give the  whole fee that it happen indeed that the last part of the equitable interest  may be consider as merge by come to one and the same person who have the whole  legal estate in he but that it will be hard that by come to a although not  absolute for the heir upon the condition break may have take the whole  equitable interest out of he that this shall prevent their incorporation and  therefore his lordship think it a equitable estate in a as well as that which  be in b and consequent that b and her husband have a power to bar it ibidem  vide p can and can this work for two other question that arise upon this case