COCKMAN and Farrer Jones raym tenant for life remainder in tail remainder in  fee tenant in tail levy a fine and the heir of he in remainder in fee forty  year after bring a writ of error and assign for error that the writ of  covenant bear testae after the death of the conusor which be admit for error  but if this fine with proclamation be not a bar to the writ of error five year  be pass be the question Treby for the plaintiff in the writ of error a writ of  error be a commission for the judge to inspect the fine and see if there be  error in it or not now for this fine to be plead in bar of this writ be absurd  and against a plain maxim in law non to lead to to be able exception the same  rei pron  interrog  Skinner peti disintegration therefore if a heir bring a  writ of error to reverse the attainder of his ancestor though the attainder  have corrupt the blood so that he can have no heir yet this attainder can be  plead in disability so likewise if a person be outlaw in a personal action  this outlawry can be plead in disability of his person he hold that a  erroneous fine bind till it be reverse and that he that have title to reverse  a fine by error have not thereby direct title to the land for that if it  descend to he it work no remitter which they agree Owen he take a difference  where there be a common recovery or judgement precedent and then a fine and  proclamation that this will be a bar to reverse the judgement c and likewise  all the court hold that if there have be a subsequent fine that it will have  bar this writ of error to reverse the fine precedent and they hold likewise  that a fine be levy of ancient demesne that it shall not be plead in bar to a  writ of disceit by the lord upon the abovesaid maxim and the court say in c b  where a fine be levy in another S name or any other thing whereby it appear  never to have be a lawful fine they set they aside every day though after five  year judgement be give here for the reversal cite per holt chief justice p W m  r b Skinner er p