case PRODGERS versus PHRAZIER eoden die in court Lord keeper Eq can ab pl S c  ante case this day upon debate the matter wear the Lord keeper he refuse to  change the possession or to do any thing in it until the validity of the  patent be determine Vernon chancery case er p in a legal trial and therefore  direct the plaintiff to bring his ejectment guard to be try in the king bench  next term and the defendant to admit the plaintiff be once in possession it  appear in this case that after the order for overrule the plea the plaintiff  have waive the proceed on the bill have obtain a order for a new commission de  idiota inquirendo and obtain a inquisition thereon to be take and the say  Bridget again to be find a idiot and obtain a new grant from his majesty of  her person and estate and a order out of this court for a injunction to the  defendant and other the tenant of the estate to deliver the idiot and her  estate to the plaintiff and also a writ of assistance to the sheriff for the  purpose and a order for a attachment against defendant and the other tenant  for not obey the last mention order the Lord keeper this be on a rehear order  that all the before mention order for overrule the plea c shall be discharge  and direct a trial at bar king b and in the mean time respite the judgement on  the plea Reg lib b fol the court of king bench upon the issue adjudge the  grant to be good hold it to be a trust couple with a interest of which a  infant be capable in the debate of this case it be in it all object whether  the grant of the custody of a idiot will pass any interest to the executor of  the grantee because such a grant carry a trust with it and that the king may  have some knowledge and consideration of the grantee but not of his executor  to which it be answer here be a interest couple with a trust as in the case of  wardship former which always go to the executor of the grantee and which be of  great consideration in the law than the feed or cloth of a idiot and of that  opinion be the court and that the king have a good title to dispose of both  the ware and the idiot one till he be of age and the other during his ideocy  and it be object in this case that the find a idiot per interval eight a year  be bad for that the find of a idiot ought to be a birth it be answer and agree  to by the court that the find a idiot be sufficient without the addition of  any other word and therefore per interval eight a year shall be surplusage for  in this case word be not so much to be regard as the reason of the law which  do not allow of ideocy otherwise than a birth judgement for the defendant Mod  vide also this case report in king b show skin et vide Dennis v Dennis sand  Rep Lord Donegals case ves