case leg versus Goldwire S c wh t l c that edn see bold v Hutchinson de g m g  Cf case collect in Loxley v heath l de g f I Nov N B by Lord chancellor where  article be enter into before marriage and settlement make after marriage  different from those article as if by article the estate be to be in strict  settlement and by the settlement the husband be make tenant in tail whereby he  have it in be power to bar the issue this court will set up the article  against the settlement Streatfield v Streatfield post heart v Middlehurst atk  but where both article and settlement be previous to the marriage at a time  when all party be at liberty the settlement differ from the article will be  take as a new agreement between they and shall control the article and  although in the case of west and Erisey bro parliament Cas and Edward bro PC  mich in the court of exchequer and afterward in the house of lord in the  article be make to control the settlement make before marriage yet that  resolution no way contradict the general rule for in that case the settlement  be express mention to be make in pursuance and performance of the say marriage  article whereby the intent appear to be still the same as it be at the make  the article so honour v honour p will vern S c partyn v Robert Ambl Rep Robert  v Kingsley Ves the general doctrine upon this subject appear to be that in the  case of article before marriage contain limitation that will give the parent  or either of they such a estate tail as will enable the father alone during  the coverture or the survive parent afterward to bar the issue of the marriage  under a legal settlement limit the estate in the same word equity will rectify  it and make a strict settlement unless the issue be otherwise provide for than  by the limitation to the heir c or case tempt Talbot er p from other  limitation or provision in other land it appear the party know and intend the  distinction but that the court will not interfere if both article and  settlement be make before marriage unless the settlement in that can be  express to be make in pursuance of the article for the court will suppose that  the party have alter their intention with respect to the term of the marriage  which they may do before the marriage though not afterward and that the  settlement be make in pursuance of such new agreement and not of the article  but when it be say to be make in pursuance of the article all room for such a  supposition be preclude case tempt Talbot de term pasche geo in curian porter