case barker versus Talcot shaw of the eighth month in court Lord chancellor a  indebt to b for rend b die c administrator to b a give a note for this rend to  c c die intestate this note be a alteration of the property and the rend  belong to the administrator of c and not to the administrator de good non of b  the plaintiff Barker hold a farm by lease from one Talcot who die intestate  and Talcot his son take administration and settle a account with Barker for  the rend then in arrear which amount to Barker satisfy part thereof by cheese  c and give a note under his hand promise payment of the remain pound to Talcot  the son before the pound be pay Talcot the son also die intestate and  afterward plaintiff Vernon chancery case Barker pay the pound to Mr shaw the  administrator of the son after this Talcot the defendant take out  administration de good non to Talcot the father and then bring a account  against plaintiff for the pound upon the trial the judge doubt whether the  note give to Talcot the son be a absolute conversion a verdict be suffer for  the plaintiff which by agreement be to stand as a security and a case be to be  make for the opinion of the judge and pen that matter Barker bring his bill  against the administrator of the son and also against the administrator de  good non of the father set forth the matter as above and pray relief and that  he may not be double charge and compel to pay the same money twice the Lord  chancellor on a full hear adjudge the note give to Talcot the son for the  pound to be quasi a payment and a good conversion in he and that the same  ought to go to his administrator and not to the administrator de good non of  the father in the argue of this case be cite the case of Norden and Levett sir  though Jones Rep Le v S c where a administrator bring trover for good and  recover and take part in hand and accept a covenant for satisfaction of the  residue and the debtor afterward fail it be adjudge in the king bench to be a  devastavit in the administrator and the judgement be afterward confirm upon a  writ of error in the house of lord and the Lord chancellor cite a case adjudge  by sergeant Pemberton when chief justice where a executor of a obligee accept  a note draw on a goldsmith for the money the goldsmith accept the bill and  before payment fail the executor afterward bring a action upon the bind and  this matter be give in evidence be adjudge a good payment vide Vernon v  Bouverie show Cooksey v Bouverie ibidem ware v Evans salk so a bill draw on a  to pay money for value receive be a good discharge of a debt though not pay  unless return by creditor in convenient time Durrach v savage show so where a  merchant draw a bill upon a correspondent I e in favour of a three person who  accept it this be payment for it make he debtor to another person who may  bring his action per Parker Ch just Louviere v Laubray Mod so if executor take  a obligation in his own name for a debt due by simple contract to his testator  this shall charge he as much as if he have receive the money for the new  security have extinguish the old right and be quasi a payment to he off of  executor so say in a note give to the editor but it do not appear there but  where executor deliver up bind due to his testator and take a new bind with  surety to himself for the debt this though a conversion at law hold to be none  in equity Armitage v Metcalf Ch can so executor invest the estate of his  testator in the fund or transfer stock from one fund to another be not a  conversion wait v whorwood atk as to the right of executor to bind the asset  of his testator by any disposition of they vide hill v Simpson Ves tailor v  Hawkins Ves Macleod v Drummond Ves Ves Drohan v Drohan ba be ray v ray coop  keane v Robarts mad Vernon chancery case er p