case the king against lee newton and other a proctor be a spiritual person  belong to the ecclesiastical court and entire under the control of the arch  and therefore if he be deprive the court of king bench will not grant a  mandamus to restore he SC ante SC post SC lev SC holt SC Mod SC Carth SC skin  SC salk mandamus to restore to the office of proctor they make a special  return that at doctor Commons c a Mr darnel take exception to it first that a  mandamus lie for the office of proctor for it be of a public concern the party  admit to it take a oath a mandamus lie because no assize lie and so there be  no other remedy for he have only a action on the case and that be but a  imperfect remedy because it be only for damage to be assess by a jury and no  more there be no restitution Hursts case side it lie for a attorney second  here be no power of visitation set forth for either the dean of the arch and  the archbishop have one and the same power or if they be different then the  dean of the arch have no power to turn we out three it be uncertain for it be  not say that the archbishop have the power of visit so as to restore as it be  set forth it be only in spiritual matter here be no prescription of a right to  restore   the return ought to be certain there be no cause set forth to  justify the turn he out no manner of right set forth to make a rate nor any  rate in particular set forth nor when it be make they show no power or law to  remove a proctor for nonpayment of ten shilling tax fourthly the statute set  forth be void for no man that have a office for life can be turn out without  prescription or charter now that statute can only be for the better government  of the proctor five they set not forth any time when this cause be receive and  then it may be before the general pardon six they have proceed against he  without any warning or bear of he side holt chief justice what the dean of the  arch do the archbishop do as what the chancellor do the bishop do dolbin  shower KB justice the dean of the arch be the very archbishop it be one and  the same jurisdiction summer solicitor general it be true in point of cause  the dean of the arch act be the act and sentence of the archbishop but here we  have return that the archbishop be visitor there and have the government and  superintendency of the proctor and officer the steward of a court baron deny a  mandamus b grant for treasurer of the NewRiver water but never determine move  for the clerk of the work of the city c cook case side which book by dolbin  justice be fit to be burn be take by he when a student and unworthy do by they  that print it holt chief justice a ecclesiastical corporation always have a  visitor and therefore a see the return and the first argument in this case  post and the second argument with the judgement of the court ante b but see  side raym lev c cock case side side lev see also I term Rep Bl Rep and Com dig  vo edit shower KB er p you never hear of a mandamus move for a abbot or a  prior every private corporation have a visitor but this differ from all the  other case for he be a public person we take notice of a proctor for our  prohibition be direct to they many act of parliament mention proctor as  officer I think it lie and for cause of removal here be none but the question  be whether the archbishop can be visitor of his own court whether we shall not  leave the judge to hear and determine their own cause and govern their own  officer it be fit to be far consider of eyres justice the judge there be more  than a deputy for the archbishop may sue before the chancellor for a pension  and yet in archbishop sheldon case a prohibition be grant to a suit for  library before dean of arch Adjornatur d