case XXI     a b James Sheffield and Ratcliff hob forfeiture treason office  prerogative patent tenant in tail general make a feoff to the use of himself  and his wife and the heir of their two body he have issue by the say wife  after the h of use in the h the husband commit treason h he be attaint and  execute the wife survive he she be tenant in tail for she be neither the  offender nor heir to he the wife die the right of the first tail and the  second tail be forfeit for this treason by the statute of h cap by all the  judge of England this wife be not punishable for waste she shall not be compel  to attorn she may take lease for year or three life reserve rend accord to h  she can bar this special tail by fine or recovery for the kin have a  inheritance in it after the death of the wife as long as the estatetail  continue tenant in tail discontinue and commit treason and be attaint this  right of action be not forfeit but if the discontinuee feoff the tenant in  tail the right of the tail be forfeit for the inheritance be involve in the  possession if the discontinuee have make a lease for life to the tenant in  tail the tail have not be forfeit for in this case at the time of the treason  he have not any inheritance to forfeit as the say statute of h require tenant  in fee or in tail have right of entry by the commonlaw or by any statute the  fee or the tail be forfeit in the case of treason the h cap abrogate west for  estatestail as to Jenkins treason tenant in tail be attaint of treason his son  be not heir to he to this entail for the father have a inheritance in the land  when he commit the treason but in Rep a Cr hob Jo raym case of grandfather  father and son the grandfather be tenant in tail the father commit Jenkins er  p treason and be attaint of it and execute and afterward the grandfather die  the son shall have this entail for the father never have the estate tail nor  the right of it to forfeit and in this case west preserve the tail and in this  case there be no corruption of blood for the h do not extend to it and before  the say statute there be not any corruption of blood in this case of a  estatetail although the attainder be for treason the king be not bind by  abeiance nor by a common recovery where he have a reversion expectant upon a  estatetail nor by a collateral warranty of his ancestor without asset be be  not bind by fiction of law in the principal case if the wife have die in the  life of the husband before office find the son have not be remit for he have  no right and hob if he have be remit the office find afterward will divest it  a person attaint be restore to his blood this do not restore his land for the  attainder have two effect to corrupt the blood and to give a forfeiture of all  his estate real and personal to the king the statute of praemunire r give a  forfeiture of all inheritance it do not extend to a estatetail the h have the  word all manner of inheritance to be forfeit the offence be great within h and  the word more peremptory than in the other the statute of h cap which vest the  land of person attaint of treason without office be to be understand as well  as if the king title be find by office if a office find a stranger in  possession of the estate the estate shall not vest in the king before a to  know facias against he in possession or seizure of the land the king may grant  they by special word of right of entry cremers case Elizabeth put in the  marquis of Winchester case see Dowties case both in coke the statute of h give  a forfeiture of the inheritance of the wife where the husband commit treason  and so of a bishop prebend abbot c in right of the church whereas the  commonlaw in these case give a forfeiture only during the coverture in one  case and during life in the other these case be remedy by e cap by a  favourable interpretation of this last statute be a affirmative statute that  the husband shall forfeit during his wife life the other as aforesaid Stamford