case thompson versus town refer to in re Lawley Zaiser v Lawley Ch Eq Abr pl S  c Eq Abr c S c vern S c a indebt to b pound in consideration of a settlement  on he by a after his death give bind to c in trust for a to pay as a shall by  will direct a direct the to be pay to c and make he executor on his sue this  bind and a bill bring by b this hold asset in bs hand to pay what be due to he  William Thompson seize of the manor of Boothby in Com Lincoln of about pound  per and which be charge with a rentcharge of pound per and for life and be old  and not marry in November settle the say manor on himself for life and after  on the plaintiff Anthony Thompson who be his near kinsman and his heir and the  plaintiff as the consideration of the say settlement do at the same time give  a bind to the defendant by William Thompson direction and in trust for he of  pound penalty condition to pay any sum or sum of money not exceed pound to  such person or person and in such manner as the say William Thompson shall by  his last will devise and a point William Thompson be at the time of make this  settlement and give this bind indebt to the plaintiff in pound by bind and do  afterward become indebt to he in several other sum of money to pound and  upward precedent in chancery er p in the year William Thompson make his will  and recite the say bind to the defendant in trust for he devise the pound  secure thereby to the say defendant the obligee and make he executor and  direct he to pay pound to one William Disney to bind he a apprentice and pound  more to set he up and pound per and to one whether Perkins for life and in die  defendant put the say bind in suit against the plaintiff who bring this bill  to subject this money to be asset in his hand to pay the pound and pound due  to he from the testator precedent in chancery the defendant by answer insist  that the consideration of William Thompson make the say settlement be that he  may have to dispose of and that he will not else have make the settlement and  therefore the say pound ought not to be asset especial to answer the plaintiff  debt and at the hear of the cause the defendant pretend he have prove that the  plaintiff and William Thompson have agree at make the say settlement that the  plaintiff bind shall be deliver up but these deposition be oppose and can not  be read because that matter be not put in issue by the defendant answer and  the proof do amount to no more than that William Thompson himself have say  that he intend that bind shall be deliver up my Lord keeper direct it to be  try at law whether it be agree that the say bind of pound shall be deliver up  or sink and that issue be try for the plaintiff videlicet that it be not agree  c the cause come after to be hear on the equity reserve the keeper decree the  say pound to be asset to pay the plaintiff debt and that it shall go to a  master to compute what due to he and he to retain so much as to satisfy  himself and to pay the overplus to the defendant and on appeal to the house of  lord this decree be affirm this case be thus state in Vernon I S on the sale  of land take a bind from the purchaser to pay any sum or sum of money not  exceed pound as he shall by will appoint he afterward appoint payment of it to  several of his relation bill be bring by the creditor of I S for satisfaction  out of asset and inter alian to have the pound apply towards payment of their  debt per cur I S have power to dispose the pound must be look upon as part of  his estate and decree it to be asset liable to plaintiff debt precedent in  chancery de boundary S the number three in curian porter