case lodge against Hollowell Trinity term car in the crown office if a carrier  buy hide of leather and curry and tan they and sell they unwrought into make  ware he incur the penalty impose by I James c information for the king the  city of London and the informer for that the defendant be a currier buy two  bide of tan leather each of they of the value of sixteen shilling of person  unknown and sell they unwrought and not convert into make ware to one James  mercer a shoemaker in London contra form to cause to stand whereupon he demand  the three part of the say value for the king the three part for the city of  London and the three part for himself croak car the defendant plead not guilty  and the jury find a special verdict that the defendant be a citizen and  inhabitant of London buy the say two hide of person unknown and after curry  they with on and tallow and other thing necessary and after shave and die they  and so be wrought sell they to the say James mercer a shoemaker in London and  whether that be a buy and sell not be otherwise nor convert into make ware  against the form of the statute they pray the discretion c and find they to be  of the same value as in the information c it be argue at the bar by roll  sergeant and Maynard for the plaintiff by mallet sergeant and HolborD for the  defendant and this term by all the court seriatim because it concern a  multitude of carrier and they all resolve that it be a offence against the  statute of James c and the value forfeit by the statute for this sell by a  currier not be cut out and make into ware be against the letter and meaning of  the statute of Edward c Elizabeth c and James c all which be well weigh and  consider and this information be ground upon the statute of I James c for it  demand the three part which none of the other statute give and the statute of  Edward c be perpetual which express forbid all person to regrate for the buy  and sell by wholesale and all person who be not artificer to convert leather  into make ware and this be a perpetual statute not repeal by any unless by the  mary S which repeal Edward c as make and procure by the shoemaker for their  private gain and the carrier be restrain by the say statute and therefore the  statute of mary repeal the statute of Edward the six and allow currier to buy  and sell leather to artificer who work it into make ware but this statute of  queen mary be repeal by the statute of Elizabeth c which repeal eight several  statute there mention concern leather and express revive the statute of Edward  c because by the repeal thereof leather be dear boot and shoe and other ware  sell at excessive prince to the undo of many but only as to one clause therein  videlicet that shoemaker may sell boot and shoe and other ware at Calais which  then in the time of Edward the six be English but now because that part of the  say statute be repeal it show that all other part of the say statute be  continue and especial the statute of Elizabeth c be express in the point that  carrier by name shall not buy and sell tan leather unless it be wrought and  cut out and convert into make ware now use or hereafter into make ware which  show that curry only be not account a convert into make ware and Berkley cite  Bracton who describe ware to be make by cut out and sew and convert they into  another species and croak car er p the statute of James c repeal the statute  of I Elizabeth c a for it have the same word no person or person c tan leather  c they who convert it into make ware c and although it be object by Holborn  that this statute be never in ure against currier but that curry and dress  have be account make ware by their trade it be answer that those statute be in  force and not repeal the currier be bind thereby and croak car punishable as  it be hold in the like case Edward pl and Henry pl wherefore they all hold  that a currier may pot sell nor buy by wholesale but peradventure they may buy  and sell in any other manner not prohibit by any statute as to coachmaker  joiner and other for the make of chair and stool who use such leather and  great inconvenience will ensue if they shall be permit to buy and sell whole  not cut out and make into some kind of ware wherefore it be adjudge for the  plaintiff