case Lionel FARRINGTONS case a action who tam and all proceed thereon shall  stand unabated notwithstanding the demise of the king for it be a civil suit  and within the provision of Edward c more and   a dyer Hutton lev Lut say cro  Elizabeth hard stram Com dig Cowp lev hawk p c debt be b ought upon the  Elizabeth c S against Thomas prince and his wife ad to answer one hundred and  twenty pound for the recusancy of his wife and absence from church for eleven  month videlicet from the d of September James to the day of the writ per quod  action to grow progressively eiden lord king et Lionello Farrington who tam c  ad habendum the say one hundred and twenty pound upon this declaration the  defendant demurrer pro eastern quod revelation Self Lionelli minus sufficient  in lege step forth ad Self Lionellum who tam c versus Self thomam manutenendum  c unde petit judgment et quod prediction Lionellus who tam c ab action svan  prediction versus eos habendum praecluda et prediction Lionellus who tam c ex  quo ipse to put under means in lege ad act prediction versus eos manutenendum  superius to disclose c and they join in demurrer which be enter in Hilary term  king James depart this life in the vacation follow and it be move in easter  term whether the original writ declaration plead and demurrer upon that action  be bring by the informer for the king and himself shall he abate by the demise  of the king as a original bring by two where by the death of either the writ  shall abate or as writ original bring by the king in his own name only as it  be in   or whether the writ and declaration only shall stand and not be  discontinue as it be resolve in the say case or whether the writ and  declaration and all proceed thereupon shall stand by the statute of Edward c  as it shall do in writ of debt betwixt common person a and because no  precedent have be produce in such case and many precedent be that those only  shall stand but that all demurrer and plead to information be determine the  court advice until this term and order that precedent shall be search to know  what have be do in action of debt upon penal statute bring by information for  the king and party croak car and now be move again and inform that there can  not any precedent be find and that such writ upon that statute have not be  frequent but of late the court resolve that this writ and declaration with all  the proceed thereupon shall stand for it be mere the suit of the party and  within the statute of Edward the six which shall not be discontinue or abate  for although the writ be quod To give back lord king et informatori yet it be  presume for himself he be as the original party only for the statute appoint  that no protection or wager of law shall be therein and the plead upon this  writ show as much videlicet that the plaintiff Farrington shall maintain his  action and that the declaration be not sufficient to compel he to answer to  the informer never mention the king and the replication and join in demurrer  be only by the informer videlicet that it be a by Ann c no writ plea process  or other proceed on any indictment or information or for any debt or account  to her majesty or successor shall be discontinue and null without day by the  demise of the crown croak car er p not sufficient to bar he of his action  whereupon they all resolve that not only the writ and declaration but all  plead thereupon and the demurrer shall stand Rep dyer Edward Fitzherbert  nonsuit