brereton case by a general pardon discharge all intrusion and entry the mean  issue of capale land in lease on rend and sue of livery that have not be  tender be discharge and the exception of homage relief rend c with the action  of account and debt reserve therein to the king do not apply to these rend  which he be not entitle to by law at the pass of the statute Thomas Brereton  be seize of the manor of Wettenhalle in Cheshire hold of king Edward in capite  be in lease for year to several tenant by several rend and so be seize thereof  die seize in the d year of Edward after who death his heir without tender any  livery enter into it and until this day have take the issue and profit thereof  to his own use no office yet find and the heir be call in the court of ware c  to know what he have to say why a office shall not be find and livery sue  allege the general pardon grant in the that year of queen Elizabeth g and  whether there be any word in the pardon sufficient to discharge hint of the  intrusion and the mean issue and sue of livery quaere and yet it be resolve by  the counsel and assistant of this court that the pardon discharge all entry  and intrusion and con dyer b er p sequent all mean issue and sue of livery but  if he have once tender his livery then by the proviso he ought to have sue it  out and so it be to be expound as a copulative and not as a disjunctive c a  like precedent of a pardon be strew by Manwaring in the time of queen mary S  in easter term that year in the court of ware and this by the opinion of  Portman and brook be chief justice of either bench brook chief baron of the  exchequer sander justice baker and Catlin queen sergeant for the discharge of  issue profit and rend of certain manor in the county of Cheshire receive and  perceive by the say Manwaring after the death of his father of which and of  the intrusion a once be find after the three pardon which be plead S the  general pardon of dyer h c and h c and e c but it do not appear that any of  the land be in lease for year as be the case of Brereton above and Bromeley  and Wray think that the queen may have a action of account against Brereton as  her bailiff or receiver and likewise a action of debt against the lessee who  be both except out of the pardon and Kayleway think that the rend be save by  the exception of all homage relief rend and service c which be not true for  the queen be not then entitle to any action or rend by law but at length it be  agree as be above resolve