case Ridout versus the earl of plymouth and other in the paper of exception  December SC ante vol where a husband personal estate be not sufficient to pay  his debt a wife can set up any claim to jewel ring picture dress plate and  other trinket give her before marriage see Snelson v Corbet post vol the  question be whether jewel ring picture dress plate and other trinket give to  mrs Lewis prior to her marriage belong to her as her separate estate and  atkins er p the husband be to be consider only as a trustee for they and as to  thing give after the marriage videlicet mourning ring family picture c whether  they shall not be retain by mrs Lewis as too trifle to be call the personal  estate of the husband Lord chancellor be it a very unfortunate and a very hard  case that mrs Lewis shall be strip of these thing atkins she claim they in two  light saint as paraphernalia and in that respect she certain be not entitle  where the asset of the husband be not sufficient to pay his debt nor be there  any trust upon the real estate for payment of debt Northey v Northey ante so  that she can stand in the place of creditor and be allow for her paraphernalia  out of the real estate and there be no case which have carry it so far as to  let the widow come upon the real estate at all event to be satisfy her  paraphernalia the two thing rely upon be that the husband shall be consider as  a trustee for the thing give to the wife previous to the marriage but it will  be impossible to maintain this because though she have a absolute property in  the jewel c by virtue of the gift before marriage yet immediate upon the  marriage the law give they the husband and where his personal estate be not  sufficient to pay his debt a wife can set up any claim nor can I possible  consider he in the light of a trustee for such jewel c as be give previous to  the marriage as it will be a manifest prejudice and fraud upon the creditor  vide countess of Cooper case cite post vol there be no pretence for consider  the thing give after the marriage as the property of the widow but she shall  be allow to be a purchaser of they at the value set upon they by the master  none of the party oppose it Reg lib b fol the attorney general upon the  consideration of the greatness of the debt submit it to the court that the  real estate shall be sell and the money arise from the sale apply in a course  of administration the word of Mr Lewis will be that the trustee shall b that  perception of rend and profit or by lease or mortgage the same raise and levy  the say sum and legacy make Payable out of the say land amount to pound and  shall pay the same in such manner as be therein before mention Lord chancellor  where a man create a trust for payment of debt and declare the trust of that  term to be by perception of rend and profit or by lease or by mortgage to  raise sufficient money for the payment of his debt it restrain it mere to a  payment out of rend and profit if it have be a trust of the rend and profit  the term may have be sell for the satisfaction of creditor so bath v Bradford  Ves lingard v Derby bro Charles Rep silk v prime ibidem note say vide Hugh v  Doulben bro Charles Rep beside if the court will consent to decree a sale of  the term people be not fond of buy a term though for year and then it will not  answer the end propose atkins because it will not raise a sufficient fund for  the payment of all the debt where there be other limit word follow rend and  profit in a trust for payment of debt I do not remember any case which will  authorize I to direct a sale in respect of several difficulty appear in this  case as well relate to the interest of the earl of Plymouth as of the creditor  and legatee of the testator Thomas Lewis Lord chancellor recommend it to the  party in the mean time to make a proper application for a private act of  parliament in order to obtain a sale of the testator real and leasehold estate  or so much thereof as shall be sufficient for the satisfaction of the several  charge thereupon Reg lib b fol