case Adam v pierce Lord chancellor Macclesfield where a term for ear be devise  to a for life remainder to b and the executor assent to the devise to a this  be a good assent to the devise over if money be devise to a infant daughter  who marry the court may refuse help the husband to the money unless he make a  suitable settlement Though if the portion be small and the husband a freeman  of London the custom of London be a suitable provision one Adam possess of  some leasehold and other personal estate have a son and two daughter and by  his will give to the value of about pound apiece to his two daughter and  devise several leasehold estate to his son and if his son shall die within age  then the premise devise to his son to go to his daughter the residue of his  estate the testator bequeathe to his daughter and make his brother the  plaintiff executor the old daughter marry the defendant dr pierce who before  marriage settle a ground rend of pound per annum on his intend wife and her  issue in strict settlement and also settle pound part of the wife portion the  second daughter marry a freeman of London and before the marriage the executor  with the consent of the peer William intend husband assign over good part of  the portion to trustee for her separate use and to be at her separate disposal  both the daughter and also the son be infant and the son have by assent of the  executor enter on the leasehold premise die during his infancy whereby a  considerable personal estate to the amount of about pound come to the two  daughter the plaintiff the executor in trust bring this bill to pass his own  account and that the two husband in consideration of the increase of their  wife portion may make additional settlement especial the citizen who out of  his own estate have make no settlement before Lord chancellor the executor be  here plaintiff and not the husband if the latter have ask any aid in equity  the court will have refuse grant it but on such term as shall appear  reasonable but the executor have assent to the legacy of the leasehold estate  to the son this be a assent likewise to the devise over to the daughter who  have thereby gain a legal interest in such leasehold estate which I can take  from they nor divest they of what be already vest in they by act of law indeed  with regard to such part of the estate as consist in money the executor be but  a trustee thereof for the wife the court can choose whether they will let the  husband have the money without make a peer William suitable settlement upon  their wife but the defendant dr pierce have make a settlement before marriage  and be a person eminent in his profession as a clergyman and possess of great  preferment in the church let he take the money due to his wife also as to the  other husband he be a linendraper in Cornhill a man of great deal and in a  thrive way the provision which his wife will be entitle to by the custom of  London be a good provision and the money come to the husband exclusive of the  leasehold estate already vest in they by the executor have assent to the  legacy be but inconsiderable it be not worth while to settle that therefore  the executor account with the husband and have his cost to this time reserve  all subsequent cost vide jacobson v William ante vol Bosvil v Brander ante vol  milner v Colmer ante vol peer William er p de term S trin Eyre case Peer  William er report date case Eyre case Trin Lord chancellor king Eq can ab pi  money be article to be invest in a purchase and to be settle on a in tail  remainder to a in fee a have neither wife nor issue and may by a fine only  dispose of the land if settle yet the court will not order the money to be pay  to a a strong they will not if there be either wife or issue but see the note  by marriage article money be lie out on security and agree to be invest in  land and settle on the husband for life remainder to the wife for life  remainder to the first c son of the marriage in tail male remainder to the  right heir of the husband the husband and wife die leave only one son who be  come of age petition the Lord chancellor that in regard if the land be  purchase he will as the only issue be entitle to the purchase premise  remainder to himself in fee as heir to his father and since a fine only will  enable he to dispose of the premise which fine may be levy as well in vacation  as in term f or these reason the petitioner apply for a order that the peer  William money shall be pay to he agreeable to what have be do by the Lord  Parker in the case of short v wood Vol and in many other of the like nature  for that it will be a vain thing for the court to enforce the make of a  settlement which as soon as make may immediate be defeat otherwise have there  be a remainder to a three person as in such case the settlement can not be  defeat without a recovery and the same not be to be suffer but in term before  which the tenant in tail may die therefore the court have be tender of take  away such chance from the remainderman Lord chancellor I can see why I shall  not have the like regard for the issue in tail as for the remainderman it be  possible the son the petitioner in this case before he can light on a purchase  and settle it may die leave issue and this be a chance of which I will not  deprive such issue also here may be a wife who I may hinder of her dower and  though Mr solicitor general Talbot press this matter with some earnestness for  the petitioner the Lord chancellor declare he can not do it until he shall be  better satisfy from precedent afterward in the case of Mr Onslow cite in that  of mill v bank ant the Lord king declare his perseverance in opinion as to  this point observe that the levy of a fine be a thing of time there be several  office to pass and the writ of covenant be to be under the great seal all  which impediment not be to be remove in a instant the tenant in tail may by  they be prevent from perfect a fine though never so much intend by he but yet  after all the present practice conform to the Lord Parker opinion vide Benson  v Benson ante vol short v wood ante vol Edward v countess of Warwick ante vol  Trafford v boehm atk Cunningham v moody ves nay if a feme covert be interest  in the money article to be lie out in land and settle her come into court and  consent will be sufficient to dispose of such her interest Cunningham v mood  ves Oldham v Hugh atk as to the objection make by the Lord king in the  principal case that by this mean a wife may be hinder of her dower if the  party apply for the money be marry it will without doubt be expect that his  wife shall appear in court and give her consent thereto peer William er p peer  William de term S michaelis