case the king against stanton Michaelmas term James roll a quo warranto lie  for hold a courtbaron to which if the party plead and entitle himself to a  manor he needs not show title to hold the court for that be incident to the  manor Com dig   a Yelv   light Bulst Noy more   Ent stram Bl Rep to Rep in quo  warranto if the king have not the franchise judgement of ouster shall be give  a manor grant by copy can have a court baron for forfeiture of the tenement  quo warranto for claim a leet and courtbaron from three week to three week  infra manor de Warfield et de Wargrave and to have good et catalla felon and  diverse other liberty he disclaim in all except the have of a courtbaron  within his manor of Warfield and thereto he say that sir Henry Nevil be seize  in fee of the manor of Warfield whereof the manor of Newname the manor of  lafield and the manor of Aylwards within the say manor of Warfield be parcel  and demise and demisable time whereof c in fee by copy at the will of the lord  accord to the custom of the manor of Warfield and that the manor of Newname be  know and time whereof c have be know as well by the name of the manor of  Newname as by the name of a message and seven acre of customary land and  twenty shilling rend and by that name be demise by a copy and that Sil Henry  Nevifl Elizabeth grant it by copy to the defendant in fee by the name of a  message c ac ration et army to say before he hold a courtbaron and claim from  three week to three week tanquam pertinent c the like title he make for the  other two manor and it be thereupon demurrer first it be move whether a quo  warranto do lie of a courtbaron for it be incident to the manor and be not any  liberty which the king can have distinct from the manor and be of common right  the king can have a quo warrant thereof and Fleming chief justice vas of that  opinion Fenner doubt thereof but Yelverton William and croak hold that a quo  warranto well lie for it be matter of right to hold court and to administer  justice and to hold plead and to croak throw draw assembly of man together and  to swear officer which if any do without right he be to render a account  thereof and therefore a quo warranto lie to show by what title he hold it but  if he there entitle himself to the manor then he need not to show that he be  to have a courtbaron for that be incident thereto Edward quo warranto   and  here the judgement be not that the king shall seize because it be not any such  franchise as the king may have but it be that the defendant shall be oust of  that liberty as Edward pl S and so it be cite to be adjudge in Chadwells case  for the manor of exon but they all hold that a copyholder can hold a  courtbaron to have forfeiture and hold plead in a writ of right for it be  standing against in interposing that a tenant at will shall hold a court  Fleming say that a copyholder peradventure if it have be well plead may have a  court to admit other copyholder there but the other croak James er p justice  deny it for a tenant at will can grant a estate to another Wherefore it be  adjudge for the king that he shall be oust