case Blandy versus WIDMORE S c p wms wh t l refer to lady e thin v earl of  Glengall h l c Thacker v key l r Eq distinguish James v castle lt master of  the roll Feb one covenant to leave his wife pound he die intestate and the  wife share on the statute of distribution come to more than the pound this be  a satisfaction post case Benjamin Bland on his marriage with the defendant now  the wife of Widmore covenant if she survive to leave her pound he die  intestate without issue but leave four brother or their representative the  defendant have take administration to her husband the bill be by a son of one  of the brother for a account and distribution of the intestate estate and it  be admit that the widow moiety of the estate upon the distribution amount to  above pound the Vernon chancery case question be whether the widow shall first  come in as a creditor for the pound and after for a moiety of the surplus of  the estate by the statute of distribution for the plaintiff it be insist that  by the husband die intestate possess of a personal estate of upward of pound a  moiety whereof come to his widow that be a good performance even literal of  the covenant for he have leave her pound and Vernon chancery case er p upward  and fall under the same reason as if he have make a will and leave her that  sum for where a man die intestate the statute of distribution have make a will  for he the case of wilcocks and wilcocks Ant can Trin be cite where the father  covenant to settle pound per and on his son but do not yet have suffer pound  per and to descend upon he that be decree to be a good performance of the  covenant and the case of Phinny and Phinny Ant can where the husband covenant  if he marry a second wife to give his son by the first wife pound he die  intestate decree to have it bring into hotchpot in the principal case the  master of the roll decree for the plaintiff that the widow pound be well  satisfy by her have a moiety of the personal estate of great value by the  statute of distribution and that she shall not come in first as a creditor for  the pound and also for moiety of the surplus affirm on a rehear vide p wms SC  and case cite in not there and further on the head of satisfaction goodfellow  v Burchett ante p but where trust term by the will of the grandfather for  raise portion provide among other event that if the child shall be by their  father in his lifetime advance and prefer with portion as good or great then  the trust term to cease the father die intestate and the child become entitle  to personal property of the father under the intestacy Eldon Lord chancellor  be of opinion that this personal estate so take by the child do not adeem the  portion give by the grandfather will Twisden v Twisden Ves but note the Lord  chancellor intimate to the party that on account of the importance of the  question he be Willing to bear it reargued with the assistance of the master  of the roll and Lord Alvanley but afterward the party not have express any  inclination to have the case argue again the Lord chancellor make the decree  for raise the portion however in the case of garthshore v Chalie Ves where a  covenant in marriagesettlement by the husband in the event of his death leave  his wife survive and child that his heir c shall convey for her use a moiety  of his real and personal estate it be hold that the widow be not entitle to a  three of the residue of the personal estate by the intestacy of the husband in  addition to the moiety under the covenant note in the above case of garthshore  v Chalie ub sup p the authority of the principal case be a good deal canvas  and consider as establish et vide further on the doctrine of satisfaction leak  v leak Ves goldsmid v goldsmid swan and case collect in note ibidem