case Richard against baker a Reg lib b foe a in chancery Trinity term Geo  refer to child v Elsworthy de g m g if a husband devise to his wife all his  household plate linen and china belong to his house at a and also his house  and garden thereto belong so long as she continue his widow together with his  jewel coach and coachhorse she take the jewel coach and coachhorse absolute  and the use only of the house and furniture during her widowhood S c atk John  Richard the plaintiff father make his will in which among other thing be this  clause I devise to my love wife Dorothy Richard the sum of two hundred pound  to be pay in three month after my death and all my household good plate linen  and china belong to my house at Teddington and also my house and garden  thereto belong so long as she continue my widow and no long which last clause  be interline together with my jewel coach chariot and coachhorse and devise  all the rest and residue to the child of which his wife be enceinte if a son  and if not to Isaac Richard and make the child executor if a son and the  defendant executor durante those inferior in rank tate modern report the  plaintiff who be the child of which the wife be enceinte file his bill to  establish the will and it be order at the roll that the wife shall deliver a  schedule of those thing which be specifical devise her during widowhood a see  bill v kinaston atk a without determine to what part of the devise the  limitation extend and on a appeal it be argue by Mr brown that those word so  long as she continue my widow must extend both to the clause precedent to they  in which the furniture be devise and to the subsequent one which give her the  jewel and be cite two case in Ro Abr and the case of lake v Bennet b atk b  decree by Lord Hardwicke February where sir John lake by codicil dispose of  his household furniture in this manner I give to my niece one hundred pound  and the house I live in during her life together with the household good plate  picture and linen and it be decree she have only a lifeinterest in the house  and furniture and the word together with be connect with the two clause  Hardwicke Lord chancellor this will be very doubtful pen as to the decree at  the roll it be say there be no determination of this matter whether modern  report er p it be debate or not do not appear but certain it be take for grant  that something be give to her only during her widowhood but however be that as  it will the question come before I on the foot of the devise and the word be I  devise to my love wife Dorothy Richard two hundred pound which be a legacy  give her absolute then come and all my household good plate linen c and the  question arise upon these word of limitation as to their relation and extent  and whether they be to be confine to the house and garden or to extend to the  linen or last whether they be to be carry on to the simul cum my jewel coach c  now as to the first part I can be of opinion that it be confine to the house  and garden but that it at least extend to the furniture c this be a natural  construction for it be not a absolute bequest but restrain to the res  essential point videlicet the house in which they be and it be his view they  shall go together and as this be the natural sense the word pursue it for it  be impossible to divide they they fall under the same devise verb and under  the same description of devise some case have be cite but there be one more  modern on the same subject I mean the case of coal v Rawlinson c salk S c ld  ray S c holt see also viner Abr and the case there cite c it be true Lord  chief justice holt differ from the other judge the word be there I give ratify  and confirm all my estate right title and interest which I now have in it and  also the house call the bell tavern to John Bellingsley and the question be  what estate John Bellingsley take in the bell tavern by this devise and Lord  chief justice holt be of opinion that the word all my estate extend only to  the first clause but the modern report other three judge hold it be but one  sentence a and the judgement give on the opinion of the three judge be affirm  in the house of lord brown case in parliament a and put the case of translate  it into Latin but what they lie the great stress on be the whole sentence be  govern by one verb but the case be strong here because the word of limitation  follow both it have be observe that these word be in a interlineation and from  hence it be infer that this be a mere intention in the testator and that the  first copy be write without any interlineation and then he bethink himself of  add that clause but I doubt that be too incertain a conjecture for I to find a  decree on and will make the construction of will very doubtful for these  interlineation may arise from different cause it may be leave out of the copy  and what make way for that conjecture be that the word belong be twice use in  two line and the clerk skip over the line be often the cause of error both in  the Greek and Latin author if that be so it make way for the other part that  they be insert to restrain both and I be of opinion it go to both as to what  have be say of these thing be perishable be not material for notwithstanding  we often see people provide that china and furniture of that sort shall  descend with the house the next question if this limitation be to be carry on  will bear a different consideration for I may give one thing for life together  with another thing in a different manner unless there be some connexion  between the thing give and if they be appurtenant I shall be of opinion they  be give in the same manner but these thing be entire of a different nature and  extraneous to the house as to the jewel they probable be her paraphernalia and  there be no occasion to make they appendant to the house and if these word be  insert on a new consideration his place they in that part of his will be a  indication of his intention and indeed whether they be interline or not their  come before the jewel make this the most probable construction for if he  intend otherwise it will be more natural to place they afterward and it be  decree that Dorothy Richard be entitle to the absolute property of the jewel  coach chariot and coachhorse give to her by the will of John Richard but that  she be entitle only to the use of the testator household good furniture plate  linen and china in his house at Teddington wherein he dwell or to the house  belong during her widowhood modern report er p