case crowder against Goodwin process of a inferior court direct to be a  servant ad doorkey without say female attendant Curice be good assault and  battery and false imprisonment as to the assault and battery the defendant  plead not guilty and as to the imprisonment hejustifies by a process out of a  inferior court and upon demurrer these exception be take to his plea modern  first the defendant have set forth a precept direct to be a servant ad doorkey  and it be not say female attendant Curice to this exception it be answer that  a precept may be direct to a private Verson and therefore shall ervienti ad  doorkey be well enough second it be to take the plaintiff and have he  adproximam curian which be not good for it shall have be on a day certain like  the case of Adam v Flythe a cro James a where a writ of error be bring upon a  judgement in debt by nil to say in a inferior court and the error assign be  that after imparlance a day be give to the party till the next court and this  be hold to be a discontinuance not be a day certain to this exception it be  say that it be likewise well set forth to have the plaintiffad neighbor curian  for how can it be on a day certain when the judge may adjourn the court de die  in diem three it be not say ad respondend some but as to this exception it be  answer that ad to answer although it be not say some be good though not so  formal and it be no tort in the officer but it be to be intend that he be to  answer the plaintiff in the plaint fourthly nor that the action arise infra  burgun but to this it be answer that the defendant set forth that he do enter  his plaint secundum experience Curice castle and when the plaintiff declare  there be show that the cause do arise infra jurisdiction a plaint be but a  remembrance and must be short rastal and when it be enter the officer be  excuse for be can tell whether it be infra jurisdiction or not five the  precept be not allege to be return by the officer and as to this exception it  be say that the officer be not punishable though he do not return the writ the  end of the law be that the defendant shall be present at the day and if the  cause shall be agree or the plaintiff give a release when the defendant be in  custo no action lie against the officer if he be detain afterward the chief  justice doubt that for the second exception the plea be ill for it ought to be  on a day certain and likewise it ought to be allege infrajurisdictionem but  the other three justice hold the plea to be good in omnibus and say that the  inferior court have a jurisdiction to issue out a writ and the officer be  excusable though the cause of action do not arise within the jurisdiction  which ought to be show on the other side and so judgement be give for the  defendant modern er p