case the earl of Kildare versus sip morris Eustace AF novembris in court Lord  chancellor post case Eq can ab pl Ch can S c bill lie here to be relieve touch  a trust of land in Ireland defendant be in England the plaintiff bill be to be  relieve touch the trust of certain land in Ireland the defendant have appear  and answer the bill and have not any way object to the jurisdiction of this  court but the cause come now to be hear the Lord chancellor object this court  can not hold plead of land in Ireland for the plaintiff it be urge that he be  proper for relief in this court by reason that both plaintiff and defendant be  here in England and that a court of equity do only field in mask its proceed  be to reform the conscience of the party and if at any time a court of equity  may be say to field in remember it be only in the case of sequestration which  be for the contempt of the party and that therefore the defendant be serve  with a subpoena here and live in England this court have proper jurisdiction  of the cause though the land lie in Ireland and the rather Vernon chancery  case for that it be never yet pretend that there be any local action in equity  and they instance for precedent the late case of the Lord Arglasse and  Muschamp ante vern and Lord Arglasse and pit and archer case et vide Barker v  dorm Vernon chancery case er p show and insist that otherwise there will be a  failure of justice for the defendant live here can not be serve with process  issue out of the chancery in Ireland but the Lord chancellor overrule the  plaintiff counsel and say as to the case of the Lord Arglasse the fraudulent  contract be make here in England and as to the present case there will be no  failure of justice for they may have a subpoena out of this court returnable  in the chancery of Ireland Qure autem if the defendant will not appear whether  there can be any further proceed upon it and whether any attachment can be  take out vide post as in his own experience in case between master and  apprentice in the city of London he have know subpoena to have issue out of  this court returnable in the mayor court in London for person that live out of  the jurisdiction and therefore pronounce the rule for the dismiss the bill but  at the importunity of the plaintiff counsel give they a week time to search  for precedent Reg lib a fol