case duke of chandos versus talbot ux for subsequent proceed see p wms Lord  chancellor king master of the roll Eq can ab pl regular the answer of a feme  covert if separate ought to have a order to warrant it but if the feme covert  separate answer be put in without a order and the same be a fair and honest  answer and deliberate put in with the consent of the husband and the plaintiff  accept of it and reply to it the court will not at the motion of the wife or  of her executor set it aside the duke of chandos bring his bill against the  defendant Talbot and his wife to compel they to perform article enter into by  the husband for the sale of the manor of shaw in the county of Berks be the  wife inheritance and late the estate of sir Thomas doleman to who she be heir  the wife answer separate insist that she be not bind by the husband article  however provide she may have pound of the purchasemoney to dispose of to her  separate use the whole purchasemoney be pound and the timber to be value she  be Willing the sale shall go on the defendant the husband also answer and  desire that the article may be perform the plaintiff reply to both the answer  and some of the relation of the wife insist that the wife answer be gain by  threat and fraud it be by the court refer to the master to examine how and in  what manner this answer be gain from her also peer William there be no order  for the wife answer separate it be refer to the master to state whether her  answer be regular put in or not the master report that the defendant the feme  cover do advice about the put in of this answer and be full apprise thereof  and do it with great deliberation and as to the matter of regularity he report  that it be put in separate in her peer William er p favour at her desire and  with the consent of her husband and the plaintiff have accept thereof and  reply thereto he conceive it to be regular in the meantime the wife die but  before her death exception to the master report be file as to the regularity  Lord chancellor call to his assistance the master of the roll and on hear  counsel they both hold that in regard it be report that the answer be put in  by the wife deliberate by good advice that she be full apprise thereof consent  thereto and that it be do at her request with theconsent of her husband and  that the plaintiff have accept of it and reply to the same therefore the feme  covert any on her behalf can not assign that which be do in her favour as a  irregularity and the master of the roll instance in the case of a essoin be  grant to a defendant where it ought not to have be that there the defendant  himself can not assign this for error it be do in his favour no more can the  defendant the feme covert or any on her behalf object to her have put in a  separate answer when it appear to have be for her advantage peer William for  which reason the feme covert answer be resolve to be regular put in and the  exception to the master report overrule re lib a fol