case lloyd against gregory the surrender of a infant lessee by deed be void  but his surrender in law by the acceptance of a new lease be good if such new  lease increase his term or decrease his rend SC Jones SC roll ab SC roll ab  sheep touch   light Jones more cro Elizabeth Perk Mod vent atk ves ld ray Com  dig Com dig Bl Rep term Rep a lease ad holiday c after the determination of a  former lease be as good as if it have be a holiday c ejectment upon special  verdict the case be a lease for ninetynine year be make by a dean and chapter  Edward croak car to begin at the Feast of the annunciation after the end of a  lease of fifty year make Henry this lease be assign to John shepherd and  William shepherd infant of eleven year of age they Elizabeth which be before  the end of the term for fifty year take a new lease of the same land from the  dean and chapter for the same term and for the same rend and upon the same  covenant and after the end of the say term for fifty year the infant be of  full age enter and hold by that second lease and pay the rend accord to the  dean and chapter which they accept for diverse year and afterward a new dean  and the chapter cause a entry to be make to avoid this lease and let it to the  defendant who enter and oust they who be infant and make a lease to the  plaintiff c this be argue by Whitwick for the plaintiff and by Maynard for the  defendant the first question be whether a infant may surrender a future  interest by the take a new lease for if he have actual surrender it have be  void be but a interest of a term and for that point all the court hold that a  surrender by a infant can be by deed but it be absolute void a and that a  surrender by acceptance of the second lease be void because it be without  increase of his term or decrease of his rend and where there be not a apparent  benefit or the semblance of a benefit his act be mere void and here be no  benefit or appearance of any to the infant for he have no manner of advantage  thereby but cause of quarrel by this lease b second whereas it be object that  it do not appear that the infant have a lease for ninetynine year for it be  misrecited in the grant videlicet the grant mention a by Geo c in all case  where any person under the age of twentyone year be interest in or entitle to  any lease for life or year he or his guardian may apply to any of the court of  equity by petition or motion in a summary way and by deed may be enable to  surrender such lease and to accept a new lease of the premise comprise in the  lease so surrender c c b see zouch v abbot burr Lord mansfield observation on  the report of this case croak car er p the lease for ninetynine year to  commence ad holiday annuntiationis after the lease for fifty year be determine  and it ought to be a holiday Annuntiationis the court hold it to be all one  for there shall be no fraction of a day and it shall begin instant from the  determination of the former lease and it be not like the case of miller v  Manwaring c where there be a recital that a lease be make Henry for year and  that lease be grant c whereas in truth it be date Henry for there be a whole  year difference and no such term wherefore it be adjudge for the plaintiff d