Bulstrode the king against doctor white a quo warranto in a quo warranto for  use of certain liberty within the manor of Bradwel in comitat Essex juxta mare  doctor white set forth in his plea that king h do grant possession in common  of oneself Katherinae the manor of Bradwel juxta mare with certain liberty  that after her death they come unto the crown again which be afterward grant  by the king to sir Walter Mildmay with these word of tot ankle of such size  qualia some the unquan to have and from he they come to the doctor in as large  and ample manner as the king himself or any other have the same by  prescription or by any other way and show that queen Katherine have those  liberty to her grant for her life all which liberty he claim to have in this  manner that the king attorneygeneral have confess his plea to be true and so  pray to have allowance of the liberty the court upon the first move of this  say by this which be show you be to have but tot ankle of such size as any  other have if this be to be take general this may trench very much upon the  crown land the queen have these liberty for her life they determine by her  death it be urge for doctor white that he be by his grant to have tot ankle of  such size privilegi freedom as the king himself or any other ever have the  question move to the court whether the doctor by this his grant be to have  those liberty which queen Katherine have it be enforce that he shall have they  by the law because Bulstrode er p by this recital they be draw into a  particular as much as if he have show such to be grant unto he as king h have  grant before possession in common of oneself Katherinaae this have be good so  here in this case this have a reference unto the first grant without any  recital of the particular nominati and this shall be so and the reason of it  appear in e Fitzherbert title avowry placit where certain liberty be grant to  the town of Northampton though they be repeal yet a new grant with a reference  to they may be good so here in this case with a reference in this manner of  tot ankle of such size be good the doctor here to have they as it be urge if  another have they before though but for year mich Elizabeth in Scaccario ex  part Rememoratoris thesaurarii rot coke lib entry fol the very case with this  now in question his word in a quo warranto against the earl of Pembroke for  claim certain liberty plead the same plea as here set forth the first grant to  queen Katherine as here in this case with a tot ankle of such size there  adjudge for he and at this day he enjoy the say liberty coke pars fol b the  case of the abbot de Strata Marcelia the case there remember be the grant of  queen mary June mark unto Francis county de Huntington Katherine his wife  where the grant be with a tot ankle eaden hujusmodi freedom privilegi c quot  qualia tantus who c or some well in some way c there resolve that when a  charter have a general reference to other charter this be as much in law as if  all the charter have be recite and in this the difference will be as in  Elizabeth b r the Lord Darcies case where liberty be grant and afterward  parcel of they repeal by Act of parliament and so become as no grant and there  tot ankle tantus shall not refer to those liberty which be repeal unless they  be special name but no general reference to those which be repeal Bulstrode  and so for doctor white the king attourn general have confess his plea to be  true allowance be pray to be grant by the court of these liberty by he thus  claim the whole court incline to be against the allowance of these liberty  thus and in this manner claim by doctor white Haughton justice if this shall  be allow of by the court this will make many new liberty in Essex if by these  general word of tot ankle of such size he shall have all which queen Katherine  have this may prove very hurtful to the crown dodderidge justice agree with he  herein tot ankle of such size be too general word against the king Montague  chief justice agree with they herein for there ought to be a certainty in  reference to a thing and to a person the whole court agree in this case  against the doctor that his plea be too general and so not good that he shall  be oust of his liberty and judgement to be give for the king in this quo  warranto