case brompton versus alkis Nov a feme seize in fee of land charge with  specific debt marry the husband receive the rend but do not pay the interest  of the debt the wife die without issue on a bill by her heir decree the  husband ought to have keep down the interest Q Richard Brompton seize of a  reversion expectant on the determination of a estate for life convey the same  to trustee to be sell for payment of debt in a schedule and if any surplus to  go to his heir executor and administrator the defendant alkis marry the sole  daughter and heir of Richard Brompton and in obtain a conveyance from the  trustee to he and his heir and pay some of the debt his wife die without issue  and the plaintiff be her cousin and heir bring his bill to have a reconveyance  there have be as be surmise sufficient raise by rend and profit for the  payment of the debt the defendant insist that what rend and profit be receive  by he be receive in right of his wife and that he be entitle to retain they  and if the plaintiff will redeem he ought to pay what the defendant pay for  debt with interest and cost and that this be not like the case of a tenant for  life and a remainderman in fee there the tenant for life shall be oblige to  pay one three of the debt or to pay the interest Vernon chancery case out of  the profit but where there be a debt charge upon the estate of tenant in  feesimple he may do what he think fit with the land and much more with the  profit and his heir can call he to a account or complain that he do not pay  either principal or interest and where a man marry a inheritrix what the  husband do as to the management of the estate be the same as if do by the wife  nor shall he be so much as restrain or enjoin from commit of waste and there  can be no one to question or call he to account tenant in feesimple as he have  the whole estate so also he have his heir in he non be hres to live per cur  the husband who receive the profit in right of his wife ought thereout to have  pay the interest and shall not suffer the debt to increase and decree the  defendant to account accord Q yet the statement in the register book be rather  confuse but on the whole appear as follow the bill be for a account of the  rend and profit of certain premise call underwood Morgan and the pool and  other premise from the death of the defendant wife and for possession of the  promise to so much of the bill as extend to underwood and Morgan the defendant  put in a plea and thereby insist that the say Richard Brompton the testator be  seize in fee of Morgan and seize of the reversion of underwood convey the same  to trustee to sell as in the print report and to pay the money thereby raise  proportionable to the debt that the premise be extend by one Langley and suit  be commence against forester one of the say trustee to compel he to sell and  pay the debt that the premise be not above pound per and and yet the say  defendant and forester agree that the Vernon chancery case er p defendant  shall take upon he to pay the debt in his say plea particular mention amount  to pound S and that in consideration thereof forester shall absolute sell the  say premise to the say defendant and his heir that the say defendant actual  pay the debt of the say Richard Brompton to the value of pound and the say  forester by indenture of lease and release that and that of September sell the  say premise to the defendant and his heir and he enter and enjoy the same year  and be at great expense in suit in defend his title and insist he be a  purchaser of the say premise for a valuable consideration and as to the  personal estate and the premise call pool and the other premise that no part  thereof or of the rend and profit thereof have ever come to his hand that in  regard three of the schedule creditor be not pay he give forester bind to save  he harmless and believe that all the say Richard Bromptons debt be pay by he  the say defendant Samuel Brompton the brother of the defendant late wife and  by Anchorett the widow of the say Richard Brompton and the mother of Samuel  and Anchorett the defendant late wife and the decree be whereupon c his  lordship declare that what money be pay by or by the order of Anchorett the  mother be pay in discharge of her son Samuel estate and daughter inheritance  but that the defendant ought to be allow what he have pay in discharge of any  of the debt within the trust but that the same ought not to carry interest  during his wife life nor ought the defendant to account for the rend and  profit of the premise during her life but that he ought to account for the  rend and profit since her death and that the plaintiff ought to be admit to a  redemption of the premise on payment of what shall appear so due to the  defendant the defendant discount for the rend and profit by he receive since  his wife death and then the decree refer it to the master to take the account  accord and the master in take such account be to compute interest on the debt  pay by the say defendant within the say trust from the death of his say wife  defendant to pay plaintiff the cost to be tax and the overplus of money on the  account if any Reg lib a fol vide as to the proportion of tenant for life and  remaindermen in respect of principal and interest James v hale ante p and case  cite in note there Vernon chancery case de term S HILLARII in curian porter