a seize in fee have a son b and a sister c and devise his land to his son b  and the heir of his body and if his son b shall die without issue of his body  and testator Wiie shall survive he the say b then she to enjoy the premise for  life and after her decease c to enjoy they for her Life and after her decease  b be dead without issue as aforesaid then a devise the premise to d e and f  and their assign for ever a die b the son die without issue but testator wife  die before he c the testator sister and heir enter and enjoy for her life and  then die e and h two of the devisees over in fee equity case abridge die d the  other devisee over survive and be lessor of the plaintiff the remainder limit  to d be a contingent remainder depend on the death of b without issue in the  life of a the testator wife and as that contingency never happen the remainder  which depend thereon can never arise r the opinion of Reynolds I who try the  Cause at Chelmsford assize and who afterward on take time to consider of it  retain the same opinion the postea be order to be deliver to defendant or  their attorney mich Davis and Norton will Rep Desbody v Boyville equity case  Abidged er I S by will give to his executor some SouthSea stock and annuity in  trust to apply the dividend thereof for the maintenance of the plaintiff his  granddaughter until she shall attain the age of twentyone or be marry and to  the intent that they shall transfer the say stock and annuity to the plaintiff  when she shall attain twentyone or be marry with the consent of a and b but  that in case she shall marry without the consent of a and b the executor to  pay her the dividend during her life and after her death transfer the say  stock and annuity to her child and if she die without issue then to go over  the plaintiff have attain twentyone bring her bill to have the stock and  annuity transfer to her which be oppose by the remainder man who insist that  in regard the plaintiff be not marry and if she marry without the consent of a  and b which may happen to be the case then she be only to have the dividend  for her life therefore the stock ought not to be absolute vest in her but king  c hold that the plaintiff be twentyone she have a absolute interest vest in  her and that the forfeiture must be intend only of marriage without such  consent before twentyone I S have express direct that the stock and annuity  shall be transfer to her when she be twentyone and decree the stock and  annuity to be transfer to her Trin Desbody and Boyville will Rep