case young against young if a infant be admit to sue by guardian and by the  mistake of the clerk the admission be not enter the roll may be amend by the  judge note for neither the act of the court nor the negligence of its officer  shall prejudice a suitor Hutton Jones hetley lev Cowp dougl term Rep a infant  may sue either by guardian or prochein ami post formedon in descender after  judgement upon a verdict the record be remove by a writ of error it be move to  have it amend in the filazers roll videlicet whereas the defendant be admit  before justice Jones in easter term James be then justice of the common plea  to prosecute in omnibus act this be enter in the plea roll and on view the  roll it be quod concession be per croak car er p curian that the defendant by  such a one his guardian shall prosecute c and so it be enter in the  remembrance and the filazers roll be that John young by I S his guardian ad  hoc admission per curian to bring before see quarto die c but there be no  entry in the filazers roll as be usual in such case quod concession be per  curian quod to strive for to follow per I S his guardian the question be  whether this may be amend and insert and all the court hold it may well be  amend notwithstanding the writ of error bring and the record remove because it  appear by the note under justice Jones hand that be admit the guardian ad to  follow and by the several entry it appear that be sue by his guardian and the  entry in the roll in the filazers office be quod to bring before see so the  admittance of the guardian appear to be before the to bring before it be the  omission of the clerk or rather the act of the court which do not cause it to  be enter in the filazers roll it ought not therefore to prejudice the party no  more than the not enter of a warrant of attorney when it appear he have a  sufficient warrant of autorney which have oftentimes be use to be enter upon  examination of the truth although a writ of error be then bring wherefore by  the rule of the court it be order to be amend but some doubt be make whether  admittance to sue by guardian where it ought to be by prochein any be good as  it be in f n b h ?But the court deliver no opinion therein because there be  many precedent that such entry have be both way a