air and Lenthall Monday may error note by hale chief justice pro lege that  ancient as h before the day in bank error be not allow yet Richard the record  be thereby remove smith and bowl roll error testae before day in bank not  allow so in Jobson and Jobson and smith and lake Elizabeth the course be  settle but Keble er p after various practice that error testae before the  judgement or day in bank yet the record be remove but if the day of the return  be before testae it do not remove but if upon declaration before issue error  be bring the court may allow it or not and stone case in Norfolk assize about  three year since a man indict of barratry plead in summer have day to try in  lend and procure a writ of error testae before the assize which I disallow  because it will spoil all practice be before the court of oyer establish but  the party be discharge by pardon and so this come not in question but in  inferior court it will be mischievous if the error may not be testae before  the judgement and the entry of the judgement be not material for that may be  several term after by hale chief justice and per curian in the exchequer where  the ancient course be hold the chief baron on the writ of error write  allocatur such a day but in other court the clerk of the chief justice write  keep back such a day and they seldom make the roll and since this there be  four day after the show the writ of error to put in bail but on error testae  the first day of easterterm if it be not show nor allow in four day its no  supersedeas to the court but execution after such testae and before show to  the clerk or allowance be not avoidable by supersedeas so be h mich car  Stibbings and Gwin and h Elizabeth Cr carter and Peter and on be made fa and  seizure if no supersedeas come before sale its good but though er Keble cause  dew be mean between seizure and sale it do not avoid it in Methold and bawd  roll title supersedeas style pl and if execution be execute before show or  allowance of error its unavoidable and ancient error be either show to the  court or allow by the chief justice which be since find inconvenient but it  will be as inconvenient if the bare take out error shall without show or  allowance be a supersedeas Twisden say that Trin car Godbolt it be settle on  solemn argument that the writ of error be the supersedeas in it self and there  be no inconvenience and if it be deliver show or allow before the return  thereof its a sufficient supersedeas but if the return be before the day in  bank or of the judgement per curian its no supersedeas and by hale chief  justice error nor other record be not return till a term after take out and  sometime long therefore its no reason to stay so long which Rainsford and wile  agree and wile say he know it rule that allowance of error after execution  take out and before execute be a supersedeas but the case in question be that  the plaintiff have judgement for security after which the defendant come in  and pray leave to plead and before the rule be out procure a writ of error and  show it to the plaintiff after which the plaintiff enter a second judgement  for want of a plea and to which of these judgement the writ of error shall be  apply be the question per curian its in the plaintiff election to either and  so be apply to the last and a supersedeas thereon grant