Burrell jurisdiction over fisherman pain fisherman preferred thing per  ambrosium Berbinsall ejusque associate fisherman de Le hundred de Stroud  contra William peach Thomain Cooper et Henry rise et elsewhere fisherman de Le  hundred de Milton in come cantii this be a dispute as to the right of fish for  oyster on the east ground on the shore of the county of ken the fisherman of  Milton claim a exclusive right of fish and seek to exclude the fisherman of  Stroud tumult have arise in reference to the dispute the matter be refer by  the counsel of state to the admiralty court the fisherman of Milton do not  appear a decree be make in their absence on the that October the substance of  the entry in the assignation book that Oct be as follow after recite the  reference of the matter to the court of admiralty by the Council of state the  citation of the party default of appearance on the part of the Milton  fisherman that the east ground be within the ebb and flow of the sea and be a  arm of the sea that London Greenwich bark and Gillingham fisherman have fish  there without interruption for forty year that the fisherman of Stroud and of  Milton have for forty year serve together as juror in the viceadmiralty court  of ken and bring in order for regulate the fish and that those who break such  order be punish in that court that the waterbailiff have never prevent Stroud  man for fish on the east ground and that Stroud man have in fact fish there  for many year without interruption that prima fancy the fish must be public  since the east ground be a arm of the sea that the Burrell er p Milton man  have produce no grant to they of the fishery or proof of anything to hinder  the commonlaw right of the Stroud man the court by interlocutory decree  pronounce that the Stroud man have the right to dredge for oyster on the east  ground and that the Milton man have no right to exclude or prevent they that  the latter be monished not to interfere with the man of Stroud and condemned  the Milton man in cost