barn against hughs ante trin car rot court debt on Elizabeth cap for exercise  the trade of a grocer in Salisbury on nil debet plead and verdict on nisi  prius at Salisbury pro plaintiff it be assign on James cap that the action  ought to be bring there but Jones pro plaintiff pray judgement be not restrain  by the negative word which only be to such action where particular power be  give to the justice but these can proceed by bill or action of debt but must  proceed criminal by information or indictment and not between party this will  repeal penal law beside for no bill or plaint can be bring there so two remedy  will be out off and the parliament do not intend to give a jurisdiction or any  new power and there can be no bill or action but here therefore general word  can repeal particular statute but only in such case where the party may have  remedy and the king may wave the way wherein they have jurisdiction and sue  here Keble where they have none and the precedent do not prove the contrary to  this and no assize be free of some of these action Baldwin pro defendant child  and ball judgement be arrest and so Cr ken and drake on Elizabeth cap which be  that all suit shall be below on the statute Elizabeth but per curian this do  not limit debt there and Cr Shoyl and tailor be of information and the action  of debt be quite take away send curian contra that the statute look only at  information and Farrington against Kemer Cr adjudge this statute give no new  jurisdiction and on the statute Elizabeth do not confine action wherein  protection or essoins lie thither and unless this or some other statute give  the justice below jurisdiction this statute James cap do not extend to it dyer    Gregory case show all the case before James may be here by the king attorney  and that statute only confine the king attorney do not prohibit or confine  action of debt to the justice below Cr against guy the same agree and the king  attorney be only bar in information not in action of debt and per curian it be  never hear of before now that the action of debt shall be quite take away and  here will be a failure of justice be it take away in regard the justice can  award process if the party remove out of their jurisdiction and albeit the  constant practice of the exchequer be to stay such suit by action of debt yet  because debt can proper be on any statute quo minus but only information yet  per curian judgement pro plaintiff