case the queen against Ridpath if a person be apprehend for a libel and bring  up by habeas corpus enter into recognizance to appear in the court of king S  bench on the first day of term ad to answer c and a information ex duty be  exhibit against he on that day and a nolle attendance be enter thereon and on  the last day of the term a new information file the recognizance be not  discharge by his appearance to the first information or by the nolle  attendance but oblige he to appear to the second information c fort salk a  recognizance be enter into by Ridpath with security whereby he be bind to  appear the first day of the term ad to answer c in the mean time to his good  behaviour and not to depart without the licence of the court a information be  prefer against he by the attorneygeneral to which information by reason of  some defect in the plead the attorneygeneral think fit to enter a nolle  attendance and then the attorneygeneral exhibit another modern report er p it  be insist in favour of Ridpath and his security first that the word ad to  answer must be extend to those crime only the suspicion of which be the cause  of his commitment and enter into the recognizance and not to the crime he  shall afterward commit or be charge with for then it will be utter impossible  for a man to get anybody to be bind in a recognizance with he a opinion of the  innocence of the person as to the crime charge be probable the only motive  that can be sufficient to induce man to become bind for other second that ad  to answer refer to the first day of the term when he be bind to appear three  that the enter of a nolle attendance be a bar to the offence contain in the  information at least that it be a discharge from any further prosecution for  it and that it be all one whether he be discharge from the recognizance by  rule of court make for that purpose modern report or by a judgement that by a  necessary consequence amount to a discharge but the court be of opinion that  the recognizance extend to all crime whatever which he shall be charge with  and that if it have relation to any particular crime only it must be mention  in the recognizance but that be only ad to answer general that there be no  such inconvenience as be pretend the bail in this case be bind in a sum  certain and not to stand in the place of the principal as in civil case that  the person not appear accord to his recognizance his absence be the cause or  reason of it what it will be the cause of the forfeiture of the recognizance  that ancient in special bail in civil action where the bail be to stand in the  place of the principal bail to one action be to stand bail to all action that  he shall be charge with when in court that this be hard in case of special  bail and be therefore now alter though alter only by rule of court and that as  to common bail the law be still the same that the nolle attendance be neither  a bar nor discharge