case Symonds versus rutter vern S c Eq Abr pl S c pale yellow can e contra  post post brown Rep S c cite by marriage article agree that pound the wife  portion shall be invest in a purchase of land to be settle on husband and wife  for their life remainder to the heir of their two body remainder to the heir  of the body of the wife remainder to the plaintiff the wife brother in fee the  wife die without issue and then the husband die the pound not be lie out per  Trevor and Rawlinson this money be not to be consider as land but per Hutchins  it be and to go to the person to who the fee be limit and not to the executor  of the husband the case be this upon the marriage of a woman pound of her  portion be put into sir Francis child hand upon article to this effect  videlicet that the money shall precedent in chancery er p remain in sir  Francis hand at interest to be lie out in land by the consent of the husband  and wife and the survivor and the land to be settle on the husband and wife  and the heir of their two body the remainder to the heir of the body of the  wife remainder to the wife brother c and that till a purchase have as  aforesaid the interest shall be pay to the husband and wife and the survivor  of they and the assign of the survivor the wife die without issue then the  husband die the brother and administrator of the wife bring this bill to have  the money invest in land pursuant to the article but the court videlicet  Trevor and Rawlinson be of opinion that the money shall not be lie out in land  but shall go to the administrator of the husband for that there be no child  nor creditor in the case that they do not take it to be the primary intent of  the article to have land purchase there be no express agreement to purchase  but only that it may be purchase if the husband and wife shall elect and agree  to have it so but Hutchins be of a contrary opinion he think the intent of the  party be that land shall be purchase and that for the remainder man the court  ought to decree it and rely on the case of annand and honeywood vern Withwick  and Jermy Attwood and Kettleby former adjudge in this court in a modern  authority Pulteney v Lord Darlington refer to as above all the numerous case  be cite on both side of the question and particular well class and arrange in  a elaborate argument of Mr Hargrave in behalf of the plaintiff as the case be  so extreme well arrange and to be find in Mr brown report page it be  unnecessary to refer to they in the margin