case norris against trist livery secundumformam charlce where good S C salk a  special verdict in ejectment the case be a deed be make to three habendum to  two for their life remainder to the three for his life and livery and seize be  make to all three secundum foreman chartce the question be whether the livery  so make as if they have all estate in possession whereas in truth one of they  have but a estate in remainder be good seys sergeant on the one side say that  possession in this case be deliver accord to the form of the deed within  mention which must be to two for life remainder to the three person and livery  and seize be only to accomplish and perfect the common assurance of the land  ought to be take favourable ut res to greater extent to be strong queen m to  pass away and therefore if a feoff be make of two acre and a letter of  attorney to give livery and the attorney only enter into one acre and give  livery secundumformam charttv both the acre pass   light a Maynard sergeant on  the other side say that there be something more in this case than what have be  open for there be a letter of attorney make to give livery to two and instead  of do that he make livery to they all which be no good execution of his  authority and therefore no livery be make the authority not be pursue as to  the case in the first institute my Lord coke err very much there in that  discourse for in say that if there be a feoff of two acre and a modern er p  letter of attorney to take possession of both and he make livery of both but  take possession but of one and that both pass it be not law but if the  authority be general as to make livery and seize and he take possession of one  and then make livery of more secundumformam chartce that be good and this be  the diffierence take in the yearbooks Edward pl Edward pl Edward pl Henry pl  the remainderman in this case be a mere stranger to the livery modern there be  also a manifest difference between a matter of interest and the execution of a  authority for in the first case it shall be construe accord to the interest  which either have but a authority must be strict pursue the court be all of  opinion that the livery in this case be good to two for their life remainder  to the three person and the chief justice say that whatever the ancient  opinion be about pursue authority with great exactness and nicety yet this  matter of livery upon endorsement of write be always favourable expound of  late time unless where it plain appear that the authority be not pursue at all  as if a letter of attorney be make to three joint and several two can execute  it because they be not the party delegate they do not agree with the authority  and judgement be give accord