black vers DODEMEAD ux on a to know facias by baron and feme upon a judgement  recover by the feme dumb sola the plaintiff need not allege their marriage  with a venue l raym barn b r S c error e c b in a to know facias bring by  husband and wife on a judgement recover by her dumb sola and the to know  facias allege quod post redditionem judgment prediction prediction Sara to  take in hand in man pillage Johan Dodemead they ind et pro causan no venue  where the plaintiff be marry and it be insist on error by sergeant Hawkins  that there must be a venue as to every fact necessary allege to entitle the  plaintiff to recover and here the marriage be the only foundation for the man  join in this to know facias these Br owe lev more reeve contra this be only a  surmise to which no venue be necessary if alien nee be plead in abatement a  venue be not necessary salk this concern strange report er p the person only  and therefore be triable where the action be bring beside the precedent be  many of they in this manner these Br off Br S clift in debt upon a bind by  husband and wife it be never allege at another day lee for the plaintiff in  error cite Henry Leon   Ent that where it do not come in by supposal but be  positive allege there must be a venue he object likewise that there be a  discontinuance the demurrer be quod narrative minus sufficient in lege step  forth ad act manutenend and the joinder be quod breve good et sufficient step  forth ad execution c which be put in judgement of the court a matter not  insist upon by the demurrer salk strange contra in answer to the first  objection cite more precedent short catalog Judicialia where it be allege  without any venue that the plaintiff be strange make a knight raze a on a to  know facias ad understand relaxationem no venue where the release make raze  Reg jud as to the second exception it will have be wrong if we have follow the  defendant demurrer there be no such thing as a declaration on a to know facias  the plea be to the writ and narrative and breve in this case be the same the  case in Salkeld be a demurrer in bar to a plea in abatement which be go off  from the matter of abatement to the merit of the cause whereas here the single  point always in view be whether the plaintiff shall have execution or not et  per curian if the joinder have be otherwise it will have be a discontinuance  the declaration and writ be synonymous and the demurrer be wrong the plaintiff  can not demurrer to it and as to the first objection there be precedent this  way we think it well enough without a venue