and countess live together and no demand be prove to be make of these arrear  of pinmoney that it be in the nature of a present of they to the earl or a  waiver of they and that at most in such case the court never allow more than a  year arrear because it be impossible but that at the husband be death some  arrear must be unless they be always pay punctual at the day and therefore a  year have be always hold to be as much as be reasonable to allow in those case  but in this case the court allow the whole as the whole be prove to be in  arrear and that between husband and wife who live well together three quarter  of a year make but little difference another point insist upon for the  defendant be that by the fine levy by earl EdwardHenry the estatetail be  extinguish or consolidate with the reversion or remainder in fee in he and  that the plaintiff Title to demand their debt equity case abridge then attach  upon the estate and cite salk Symonds and Scudmore and therefore that the rend  and profit receive by earl Edward Henry ought to be apply towards a  satisfaction of the plaintiff demand and by consequence that the plaintiff the  countess be administratrix to the say earl have asset in her own hand for that  purpose but the court be Clear of opinion that the rend and profit receive by  earl EdwardHenry of his own estate whereof he be then owner shall not be  applicable for that purpose before a demand make because till then he do no  wrong in receive the rend and profit of his own estate and so it have be  decree late in the case of Montague and board in this court mich countess of  Warwick and Edward SC dick the testator charge his real estate which be  subject to a mortgage contract by his ancestor and also all his personal  estate with his debt and legacy it be decree by ld Thurlow and afterward in  the house of lord that the mortgage shall be bear by the estate original  liable and that the executrix have discharge it out of the personal estate  shall be repay Lawson v Hudson equity case abridge bro Chan