case jesus college versus bloom Michaelmas term see Pulteney v warren Ves Jur  Parrott v palmer my king sawyer v Goodwin l I Ch wright v Pitt l r Eq SC cite  Ves SC Amb post bill for a satisfaction for waste in cut down tree against a  assignee of the lessee of the college after the assignment and for waste do  before the assignment after the estate of the tenant that cut down the timber  be determine by assignment a bill can be entertain mere for satisfaction  without pray a injunction the bill be bring to have a account and satisfaction  for waste in cut down tree against the defendant a assignee of the lessee of  the college after a assignment of term and for the waste do before assignment  Lord chancellor upon the open of the case the bill seem improper and a action  of trover be the remedy where the bill be for a in junction and waste have be  already commit the court to prevent a double suit will decree a account and  satisfaction for what be pass so upon bill for discovery of asset the court  will decree a account which the party be entitle to here and be incident to  the other relief atkins let precedent be search for if there be any I will  follow they but if none I will not in make one his lordship adjourn it to the  first day of cause after term and upon that day Mr Hoskins cite for the  plaintiff p wms bishop of Winchester versus knight and p wms Whitfield versus  bewit Lord chancellor the first question be whether bill ought to be entertain  mere for satisfaction for timber cut down after the estate of the tenant that  cut it down be determine by assignment or otherwise without pray a injunction  I be of opinion they ought not waste be a tort and the remedy lie at law in a  action of waste the place waste be recover in a action of trover damage the  ground of come into this court be to stay the waste and not by way of  satisfaction for the damage but by way of prevention of the wrong which court  of law can do in those instance where a prohibition of waste will not strict  lie but in all these case this court have go further mere upon the maxim of  prevent multiplicity of suit which be the reason that determine this court in  many case as in bill for account of asset c that original be only a bill for  discovery atkins er p which can he have without a account and therefore the  court will make a complete decree and give the party his debt likewise so in  bill for injunction the court will make a complete decree and give the party a  satisfaction and not oblige he to bring a action at law as well as a bill here  but nothing will tend to great vexation than to admit of such bill as the  present after the term be at a end vide smith v cook atk and I be glad to find  there be no precedent it do not appear in the case cite out of p wms that no  injunction be pray I believe there be and if so it be the common case atkins  it be beside different from the present because the plaintiff there be only  entitle to a moiety of the i and of the timber which be the principal matter  and therefore a account be necessary the other case be the case of a I which  be a sort of trade and a account be therefore necessary vide story v Lord  Windsor atk and there be many case where this court have make decree in the  case of i which they can not have do in case of timber therefore the present  case be reduce to this that it be a bill bring by the college to have a  account after the determination of the tenant estate he have assign of a  little timber cut down without pray a injunction and I think it be such a bill  as the court ought not to entertain the next question be as to cost and I be  of opinion as the plaintiff be not bar of his remedy at law he ought to pay  cost beside what the bill be bring for be of so small value as to be beneath  the dignity of the court another reason be that this suit may have be bring in  the court of grand session in Wales which have be often hold and this be a  strong reason for discourage bill here therefore let the bill be dismiss with  cost but without prejudice to any remedy the plaintiff may have at law