case sir bernard GRENVILE against sir nicholas smith executor of sir George  smith a judgement upon a verdict enter different from the entry on the postea  be amendable by Henry c post ante roll ab Jones side cro car corn dig Cowp  dougl to Rep a record in c b may be amend after error and before removal into  b r covenant for that the testator covenant by indenture to pay for his  daughter grace marriage with the plaintiff son four thousand pound at several  day and for nonpayment of four hundred pound at one day the action be bring  the defendant plead non be factum testator and find for the plaintiff and  damage find four hundred and twenty pound and for cost fiftythree shilling and  fourpence and the cost increase by the court to twelve pound the judgement  enter upon the postea be quod recupere financial loss prediction amount to  four hundred and thirtytwo pound de good testator si so much to have in shades  of dead c et si non pro misis pillage de good not common with others c but the  entry of the judgement upon the roll be quod recupere financial loss pillage  attingent ad four hundred and thirtytwo pound de good testator si tant c et si  so much in shades of dead nest non to have tunc financial loss prediction de  good to ward off not common with others where it ought to have be lunc mix  p? cedie c hereupon a writ of error be bring and the record remove and the  matter upon the entry of the judgement be assign for error and it be now move  in the king bench that it may be amend for there be not here any defect in the  court nor be the prenotary who sign the judgement but in the clerk who enter  it contrary to his warrant for the entry upon the postea be well and that be  his warrant for enter it upon the roll which be enter otherwise be a mere  default in the clerk and be amendable by the statute of Henry c a and all the  court be of that opinion upon view of the postea and upon examination that it  be so before the entry of the judgement for it be award to be amend accord to  the roll and it be amend accord although it be object that the record be  remove but it be hold that the record be not to be remove but the transcript  thereof therefore it may be well amend and although the record itself have be  remove yet it be usual in the common plea upon such a misprision to amend the  record which be before they and so if the king bench will amend it there shall  not be several record before they wherefore it be here amend but afterward in  Hilary term James upon diminution allege in the exchequer a certiorari be  award to certify it and after diminution it be certify accord to the amendment  the judgement be affirm croak throw hilary term James in the king bench sir  James lea Knt chief justice sir John Doderidge Knt sir Robert Houghton Knt sir  Thomas chamberlain Knt justice sir Thomas Coventry Mt attorney general sir  Thomas heath Knt solicitor general