case SPETTIGUE v carpenter Lord chancellor Talbot S c dick Eq can ab pl after  a award make it be too late to confirm the submission so as to make it good  within the act of W cap a party submit to a award desire the arbitrator to  defer make his award until he shall satisfy he as to some thing which the  arbitrator take to be against he though this be within two or three day before  the time for make the award be out yet the request not be comply with the  award be hold ill on a bill to set aside a award the case be there be several  state account between the plaintiff and defendant whereby considerable sum be  due from the defendant to the plaintiff but the arbitrator without regard to  any of these state account make up a account in his own way bring in the  plaintiff indebtedto the defendant pound and award the former to assign over  to the latter a mortgage which he have on the other estate upon which mutual  release be to be give peer William er p the plaintiff understanding what award  the arbitrator be about to make send a messenger about two or three day before  the time for make the award peer William be expire to let the arbitrator know  that the plaintiff desire he to defer make his award until he shall talk with  he about his demand to support the state account and know what objection be  make against they however the arbitrator will not defer make the award the  submission be confirm by a order of the court of chancery but such  confirmation be after the award be make for the defendant it be insist that  this submission be confirm by a order of the court pursuant to the statute of  the that and that if W cap it can not be set aside but for corruption or some  other undue mean and that in point of time the party be confine to make his  complaint even as to that before the end of the next term after the award be  make the Lord chancellor call for the act and have read it take notice saint  that it be thereby provide that where the submission be confirm by rule of  court the award that shall be make shall be conclusive to both party and the  performance of it enforce by process of contempt of the court so that within  this act the confirmation must be prior to the make of the award dly that with  regard to the time within which the complaint be to be make it be in this case  impossible for the party to apply within a term after the award make because  the submission be not confirm by a order of this court until the end of the  next term after make the award dly that with respect to the reason allow by  the act for set aside the award they be corruption or other undue mean now it  be act undue to proceed in make the award when the plaintiff have desire to be  hear against the arbitrator determine in contradiction to so many state  account peer William and though it be answer that this be within two or three  day before the time for make the award expire and with a intent that no award  shall be make and though it do not appear that the plaintiff be ready to be  hear within the time yet forasmuch as here seem to be just ground for the  plaintiff to desire to be hear and in regard it will be difficult to assign a  reason for reject so many state account so late allow and pass between both  the submit party the court set aside the award with cost Reg lib b fol the  practice of the court be not in conformity to this opinion see Alardes v  Campbell Barnard in king b Chicote v Lequesne ves sen Pownall v king Ves  Fetherstone v Cooper Ves smith v synes mad with respect to the time limit by  the statute which be a bar only to a application to set aside the award and  can be insist upon in support of a application to enforce it see Zachary v  shepherd t r Pedley v Goddard t r Lowndes v Lowndes east Davis v Getty S and S  Dawson v sadler S and S Auriol v smith turn Anderson v Coxeter Str but the  legality of a award may be question on other ground appear on the face of the  award at any time when the adverse party attempt to enforce it by attachment  or otherwise holland v brook t r Pedley v Goddard Lowndes v Lowndes Auriol v  smith Dawson v sadler ub sup