CCCLXXXIV hollingshed and king case debt privilege of London hollingshed bring  debt against king and declare that king be bind to he in a recognizance of two  hundred pound before the mayor and alderman Leonard er p of London in those  camera de guildhall London upon which recognizance the say hollingshed  heretofore bring a to know facias before the say mayor c in exteriori camera  and there have judgement to recover upon which recovery he have bring this  action and upon this declaration the defendant do demurrer in law because that  in set forth of the recognizance he have not allege that the mayor of London  have authority by prescription or grant to take recognizance and if he have  not then be the recognizance take in person non judge and so void and as to  the statute of west cap it can be take to extend to recognizance take in  London which see by the word de his who think over are in person porter domini  king and he justice who record to have in rotulis the dawn irrotulatur c and  also at the time of the make of that statute London have not any sheriff but  bailiff and the say statute ordain that process shall go to sheriff c but the  whole court be clear of a contrary opinion for they say we will know that  those of London have a court of record and every court of record have a  authority incident to it to take recognizance for all thing which concern the  jurisdiction of the say court and which arise by reason of matter there depend  another matter be object for that the recognizance be take in those camera but  the court be hold in exteriori camera and therefore not pursuant but as to  that it be say by the Lord Anderson that admit that the recognizance be not  well take yet because that in the to know facias upon it the defendant do not  take advantage then thereof he shall be bind by his say admittance of it as if  one sue forth a to know facias as upon a recognizance whereas in truth there  be not any recognizance and the party plead admit such record and thereupon  judgement be give against he it be not void but voidable Fleetwood recorder of  London allege many case to prove that the court of the king be bind to take  notice that they of London have a court of record for if a quo warranto issue  to justice in eire it behoof not they of London to claim their liberty for all  court of the king be to take notice of they and at last after many motion the  opinion of the court be for the plaintiff and it be say by Anderson and in  manner agree by the whole court that if depend this demurrer here the  judgement in London upon the to know facias be reverse yet the court here must  proceed and not take notice of the say reversal cro hill Elizabeth in the  common plead