case TAVERNOR against SKINGLE a submission that if the arbitrator do not agree  they may choose a umpire shall be intend if they do not agree and make a award  roll ab side salk term Rep term Rep kid on award a award appoint one of the  party to pay money at or in the house of a stranger be good post Com dig kid  on award debt upon a obligation of one hundred pound condition to perform the  award of I S and I d so as they make their award before the ten of October  follow under their hand and seal and if they do not agree then to stand to the  umpirage of I n so as he make it in write under his band and seal before the  twenty of October follow the defendant plead that the say I S and I d do not  make any award before the ten of October nor I n the umpire before the twenty  of October c the plaintiff reply true it be that I S and I d do not agree nor  make any arbitrament before the ten of October but that I n the umpire do make  a award before the twenty of October under his band and seal and show it  wherefore inter alian the defendant be to pay to the plaintiff thirty pound  upon such a day at the house of William Sutton in Chelmsford be the sign of  the cock and for the nonpayment of the say thirty pound allege the breach the  defendant thereupon demurrer wright for the defendant move that this  submission be void and uncertain for it be if they do not agree and it do not  appear to what they shall agree and a uncertain submission be void say non  allocatur for the word if they do not agree have the intendment if they do not  agree and make their arbitrament under their hand and seal before such a day  for otherwise it be quasi no agreement within that condition wright then move  that this arbitrament by the umpire be void for he appoint money to be pay at  the house of a stranger wherein by intendment the defendant have no interest  nor can compel he that be owner of the house to suffer money to be pay there  and a arbitrament ought not to appoint a thing to be do to a stranger or by a  stranger over who the defendant have not power nor in a stranger house by  which act the defendant may be a trespasser   Henry pl but all the court agree  that the arbitrament be good for the appointment of the payment of the money  at a stranger house especial be by intendment a common inn can be unreasonable  or shall make a unlawful act but by intendment the plaintiff will procure such  kindness that the money may be pay croak car there a vide car c and Ann c ld  raym b   c strange will Cowp croak car er p and if the stranger shall deny the  payment to be there it peradventure may be a good excuse for the defendant but  the arbitrament by itself prima fancy be good enough whereupon it be adjudge  for the plaintiff