case TASHMAKER who tam c vers hundred OF Edmonton in c b a action lie upon the  stat Edward against the hundred for a robbery commit on a Sunday  notwithstanding the stat car if it appear that the person rob be go only to  his parish church vin Abr title robbery c pl Str SC Com dig Brownl godb cro  James roll Rep SC Bac Abr burn Ecc law Gibs cod burn just bull Ni Pri edit p  this be a action upon the statute Edward Edward saint c a against the hundred  of Edmonton de plea quod cum pillage Tashmaker to be possessionat de two  peciis ear defecate peremptory or urgent call guinea valour S separatin ac to  be possessionat de good catallis sequen ut de good not common with others  videlicet a silver watch a gold watch and chain comens a pair of earring and a  diamond necklace such possessionat existen quidam malefact pardon Apr at  Edmonton infra pillage hundred de Edmonton insult fecit in Self Tashmaker  Juditham wife he tunc praesen pillage two guinea de eoden Tashmaker prediction  good catalla de pillage Tashmaker Juditha wife he tunc praesen felon to take  in hand c upon not guilty plead at the trial before king Ch I on the that of  November at Westminster it appear by the evidence that Tashmaker marry the  daughter comens er p of Mr gold who live at Edmonton and have continue with  his wife at the house of Mr gold from the first of march precedent and that  upon the that of April be a Sunday Tashmaker and his wife and Mr gold be in  his coach go from Mr Goulds house to Edmonton church two mile distant and by  the way be rob and the good beforementioned take from Tashmaker and his wife  and it be insist that the action be not maintainable since the statute car cap  which enact that if any travel on the lord day be rob the hundred shall not be  charge for the robbery c but it be answer that go to the parish church can not  be call a travel within that statute which be make for the better observation  of the lord day and confirm the statute make for the public exercise of  religion and by stat st elitz c S a Elizabeth every one be to resort to his  parish church on the lord day but the travel prohibit by this Act be such as  tend to the profanation of that day and the hundred by the statute be liable  to the king though the party can not have a action where he be rob on travel c  and therefore the bar to the action be intend as a penalty but such penalty  can never be suppose to be intend against a man who be go to his parish church  and afterward upon a motion the court declare that the action well lie though  perhaps it may have be otherwise if he have be travel for his pleasure as to  the manner of raise the hue and cry and what be to be do to take advantage of  sue the hundred for the robbery see hale p c p saint Elizabeth c saint Geo c  saint Geo c will