case blunt and far against SNEDSTON Michaelmas term James roll if a juror be  return in the venire and distringa of the Christian name of Constantine and be  call in the panel evenly the judgement be erroneous post roll ab   a cro car  cro Elizabeth hob Com dig Bac Abr Cowp dougl if judgement be give in ejectment  against several defendant and one of they obtain a release pen a writ of error  he may plead it in bar against the releasor puis darrein continuance error of  a judgement in the common plea in ejectment where one of the defendant plead  not guilty and verdict for the plaintiff against both and judgement accord the  error assign be because in the venire facias Constantine callard be return and  so name in the distringa but in the panel annex thereto by the sheriff evenly  callard be return and swear and so be return by that name upon the dorse of  the postea this error be assign over as far as the record of the venire facias  and distringa be remove before it be hold to be manifest error for they be  distinct name of baptism and there can be any amendment as this case S  wherefore they be of opinion to reverse it but give day to advice from Hilary  term until this term croak throw the defendant in the writ of error in the  mean time obtain a release of all error from one of the plaintiff in the writ  of error and the first day of this term plead it in bar as a plea puis  darraigne continuance thereupon a demurrer be enter in the name of both the  plaintiff in the writ of error for in nullo be erratum be plead before there  can not now be any summons and severance and it be now argue whether this  release of one of the plaintiff in the writ of error shall bar both or none of  they for it be move that in regard the action be in the personalty the release  of the one shall bar the other but all the court after argument at the bar  resolve that it shall bar but he only who release it for the plea be by way of  action to discharge themselves of damage which be recover against they and to  be restore to the possession which be lose by the first judgement and they be  join in the first action by the act of the plaintiff and not by their own  voluntary act it be not reason that the act of one shall charge or prejudice  the other for then by such practice any one may be charge and shall not have  any remedy to discharge himself but if they have be plaintiff in the record by  their own act as in debt upon a obligation and have be bar in judgement in  error upon that judgement the release of one shall bar the other for as the  one may have release the obligation or discharge the principal action which  shall bar his companion wherein they be joint plaintiff by their voluntary act  so the release of the writ of error by the one shall bar the other but it  shall not do so in the principal case for the reason before allege wherefore  it be adjudge that the judgement shall be reverse as to he who do not release  and that he shall be restore to all what he lose and as to the other who  release that he shall be bar in his writ of error note this manner of  judgement be enter by special direction of the court fide Henry pl Edward pl  Richard condemnation and a judgement in easter term Elizabeth roll in the case  of razin v ruddock croak James er p