c duchess OF Albemarle v the earl OF bath S c Nels Eq can ab and at great  length in Charles can power of revocation execute ante case post case the duke  of Albemarle have make his will in make a settlement by deed in wherein he  settle great part of his estate upon the defendant with a power of revocation  by deed or will to be execute in the presence of six witness three whereof to  be peer and upon tender of d afterward in he make his will testify by six  witness but none of they a peer and give his estate to one Mr monk and no  tender be make of the d in this case it be agree that this be not a legal  revocation because the circumstance be not pursue accord to the power there be  no peer witness to the last will nor any tender make of the d so the only  question be whether freeman the court of chancery shall supply this defect to  establish the last will as it be say in some case it have do and the case of  arundel and Philpot ante c p and several other case to that effect be cite and  this rule be lie down and seem to be agree videlicet that where there be two  conveyance to two several person which be mere voluntary there this court  shall not supply any defect in the execution of either of the conveyance or of  any power and there he that have the first deed have the better right see  stapilton v stapilton atk morris v morris ibidem ex part Dubost Ves Graham v  Graham Ves jun Coventry v Coventry atk and particular Clavering v Clavering  vern cite in Worrall v Jacob Meriv but this court will oftentimes in case of a  purchaser or a creditor or for a provision for a young child supply the want  of livery burgh v burgh Rep tempt finch post append c or attornment or  surrender in case of a devise of a copyhold see now Geo c and so likewise in  case of the execution of a power of revocation where all circumstance be not  exact performed But the intent to revoke must have be manifest Holmes v  Coghill Ves and though it be allege that the law have be very favourable in  the construction of the execution of those power as a power to revoke by deed  where a fine be levy and a deed seal afterward to lead the use adjudge a good  revocation though the fine itself have extinguish the power yet both shall be  take together for one conveyance ante c p post c p and it be say that the  circumstance of revocation ought to be pursue or otherwise it will not be good  although the law have sometime be favourable in expound where they be pursue  as where a man reserve a power to revoke by express word by deed or will and  make his will and devise the land this be construe a revocation by express  word so in the case of William there be a deed though the fine be first levy  so it be revoke by deed in the principal case the court deliver no opinion  because other point be to be debate but incline that they can not supply the  defect of the execution of this power Adjournatur afterward the court deliver  their opinion for the Lord of bath that the deed be not revoke post case  freeman er p