case strafford versus Berridge in court Lord chancellor the general sense of  the word of a will be to be restrain by the intention of the testator and the  other word they be in company with by the word all the rest and residue of my  estate chattel real and personal only the residue of the testator personal  estate passes Mr solicitor general for the plaintiff mr Strafford by a codicil  devise to mrs Berridge his niece in these word I give and bequeathe all that  my mansion house c to mrs Berridge during the term of her natural life also  all my good I chattel householdstuff furniture and other thing now be and  which at the time of my death shall be at or in my say dwell house and the  appurtenance I and also the use of all my plate during life he also devise to  her his coach horse pound and pound for mourning and by this codicil mrs  Berridge claim pound in money which be in the house at the death of the  testator the testator by first give her his house for life show what he mean  by his good and chattel and so do the follow word household stuff and  furniture for if the word good and chattel be to be take in their full sense  then household stuff and furniture be comprehend under they and those word  will be superfluous and in this sense the title deed of his estate or security  for money if they be find in the house will pass whereas it be plain he do not  design to comprehend even the plate under these general word for he after  express devise the use of it to her for life and the word now be and which c  plain show he do not design to give her money because it will be so very  difficult to prove that the money in the house at the time of his death be the  identical money he have there when he make his will Mr lutwych the general  signification of the word of a will may be restrain by the intention of the  testator and other word they be in company with as appear from the case of  Merryland and Wilkinson cro can and of Markham and Twisden which be decree by  Lord Harcourt after it have be speak to two or three time the testator make  his will inter all in these word all the rest and residue of my I estate  chattel real and personal I give to my wife his lordship decree mosely report  only the residue of the personal estate to the wife though a fee will have  pass if the will have go no further than the word estate in this case the  testator to show it be not his intention to pass every thing the word will  extend to mention afterward particular as his coachhorse and the use of his  plate for life and a pecuniary legacy mosely report er p of pound and though  bind will pass by a grant of in all respects good yet here by the word good or  other thing only furniture and thing of the like nature will pass and in the  case of the bishop of Salisbury and dorm it be adjudge by LordHarcourt that by  a devise of good jewel money or picture do not pass Mr attorneygeneral for the  defendant it be allow that all the word of this will be general enough to take  in money but it be say they must be restrain to household good and furniture  because if they be take in the general sense the word household stuff and  furniture be superfluous but this be the usual manner of word will after  general word to enumerate particular and may not we with more reason say why  do he use those general word if he mean nothing by they and that they show his  intention to pass more and the word other thing show he mean every thing that  be personal whereas the plaintiff by other thing will have he mean only the  same thing and the word will not comprehend the title deed for they follow the  estate and though he may be suppose not to have mean security for money which  be choose in action yet this money be a thing in possession and actual in the  house at the time of his death and the express devise afterward of the use of  the plate to her for life show that he think that it will otherwise have pass  to her absolute by the general word and these word must signify more than  furniture for a library of book wine in the cellar c if any will have pass I  agree that where word which by themselves will have carry the real estate be  mix with word that will pass only the personal estate that it be reasonable to  restrain their general signification but that authority can they produce to  restrain the sense of these word which all relate to a personal estate Q the  word now be and which c the say be a double description of what be to pass but  I rather think his intention be to extend the word either to such thing as he  have at the time of the make the will or at his death in the house and though  he have remove any of the good he certain design they shall pass and the money  in his house at the time of his death shall be take to be there when he make  his will unless the plaintiff can prove it come in since mosely report Lord  chancellor there be a opinion that the sheriff on a become facias can seize  money because the money be to be levy de good catallis but money can be levy  from money but not to trifle the testator can reasonable be suppose to have  mean money by these word but only good of the nature and sort of household  good and the word can be understand in their general sense for that will take  in bind and security for money which there be no colour to suppose the  testator design to pass Swinb part sect n Chan Rep Ant Cas