case OFLEY against paradine Trinity term James roll a declaration in debt for  rend on a lease state that the plaintiff be yet seize of the reversion when it  appear that at the time of the writ the lease be determine be not erroneous if  he be seize when the cause of action accrue post Yelv latch salk cro Elizabeth  Com dig dougl in debt for rend if the plaintiff entitle himself as a  reversioner by a recovery he need not show in what action it be suffer dougl  debt upon a lease for twentyone year by John paradine January Elizabeth from  the Christmas before render twenty pound a year at the four usual feast of the  annunciation midsummer Michaelmas and Christmas or at the end of one month  after every of the say feast who convey the reversion by common recovery to  Hugh Ofley who die seize and this reversion descend to the plaintiff who be  yet seize of the reversion at the day of the bill purchase which be February  James and the defendant be possess of the term by virtue of r the say demise  there be ninety pound due for four year and a half end at Michaelmas James and  for a month after the feast and yet be behind unde action to grow  progressively c the defendant plead to issue and it be find against he and  judgement give for the plaintiff whereupon he bring a writ of error the first  error be for that he declare on a lease for twentyone year make January  Elizabeth beginning at the Christmas before and suppose that he be seize of  the reversion the day of the bill videlicet February James which be false and  repugnant in itself for the term end by his own show the Christmas before then  he can be seize of the reversion nor the other possess of the term the day of  the bill so it be false and ill in itself say non allocatur for although he  can be seize of the reversion at the day of the bill yet he be seize at the  time when the rend be incur which be the cause of the action and the other be  but surplusage wherefore it be well enough second for that he plead a recovery  which be his title insufficient not show in what action Sed non allocatur for  although the recovery be imperfect yet the defendant be a stranger can take  advantage of any insufficiency therein wherefore the judgement be affirm