burrow v JEMINEAU S c mosel I Eq Cas Abr Str see Ogden v sander Wheaton U S A  Ellis v MHenry lr c p Nov sentence of a foreign court who have jurisdiction  and the person be within it be conclusive bill of exchange be draw in London  Payable by a at Leghorn who accept it and be endorse by several person by the  law of Leghorn if the drawer fail the acceptor be no further bind to pay than  he have effect select case tempt king of the drawer in his hand to which  purpose there be sentence in the court of Leghorn which be read here the  acceptor come into England and action be bring against he injunction be have  and now bill bring to make the injunction perpetual in support of the  injunction it be say that the lawmerchant be a universal law that it extend to  all trade people and not to be circumscribe by local or municipal law and if  it be not so it will be destructive to trade and commerce that the acceptor on  who credit other endorse or take the bill shall not be liable but it appear by  the deposition of several eminent merchant that it be not the law of Leghorn  but if it be so that may be take advantage of at law and be only a conditional  acceptance to which it be answer that where a foreign court have jurisdiction  and the person be within it the sentence of that court must bind and by that  particular must be guide without regard to what the law be in other place Lord  chancellor here be a sentence by a proper court who have jurisdiction of the  cause and the person be within it I can have no regard to what merchant say be  the law of Leghorn since I have the sentence of the court here by which I do  think myself bind I remember in some of the report in Charles nds time a man  kill another in Portugal and be indict for it here on the statute he plead a  trial and acquittal there and hold a good bar that case be cite Mod there be  many case in roll abridgment of sentence of foreign admiralty carry into  execution here have I be to try it I shall have admit it as evidence I  remember when I be recorder of London I ask Lord chief justice holt whether I  shall oblige they to plead a sentence of a foreign admiralty or admit it to be  give in evidence he say whatever defeat the promise may be give in evidence on  non assumpsit it be every day experience if sailor bring action for their wage  a sentence in the admiralty will conclude they because the court have a proper  jurisdiction and they have make their election I shall think it a proper  defence at law but different man may select case tempt king er p have  different opinion there may be little nicety and formal objection at law here  we come to the real justice of the case so perpetual injunction but without  cost