case thompson versus ATTFEILD Eq can ab d pl S p a conveyance by way of feoff  may operate as a covenant to stand seize defect in a voluntary conveyance not  supply in equity otherwise if make for a provision for child in this case it  be allow although a conveyance be make purport a feoff yet nevertheless it may  operate as a covenant to stand seize so cross v Scudamour vent Stapleton v  Stapleton atk so where conveyance by lease and release and lease for year lose  the release shall nevertheless operate as a covenant to stand seize brown v  Jones atk so a deedpoll contain disposition of the whole real and personal  estate of a be in consideration of love and affection but without livery shall  be good by way of covenant to stand seize Rigden v vallier ves feoff in future  be void for livery which be essential to it can give a freehold in future    light a a but a man by covenant to stand seize to the use of another may make  a estate to commence in going to be cross v Faustenditch cro James Osman v  sheaf Le v and a difference be take between the several sort of voluntary  conveyance for though general defect in a voluntary conveyance shall not be  supply and make good here yet if man voluntary make a settlement as a  provision for his child and for their maintenance such a voluntary conveyance  shall be supply and make good here the case in the register book be as follow  Henry Attfeild the defendant greatgrandfather purchase a message call  Frogpoole and upon the marriage of William Thompson plaintiff grandfather with  mary his old daughter declare that he have purchase the same for the benefit  of William and mary and that he will settle the same accord but the say h  Attfield die before he have make any such settlement although the say William  and mary have be in possession of the premise for several year before his  death leave I Attfeild the defendant grandfather his son he survive who  previous to and in consideration of a marriage which afterward take effect  between Anthony Thompson plaintiff father the son and only child of the say  William and mary and Elizabeth his daughter settle the say premise on the say  Anthony and his heir for ever and the say Anthony be in possession thereof  until he die leave plaintiff a infant the bill then state that after his death  the say I Attfeild the settlor apply to mary Thompson his sister and the  grandmother of the plaintiff in who hand the title deed of the say land be and  obtain they from her under pretence that the same be defective Vernon chancery  case er p in law and that he will cause the same to be rectify and that he  will show they to counsel and then will convey a good and lawful estate so  that the same shall come forthwith to plaintiff and his heir but that instead  thereof he get possession of the premise and into receipt of the rend and cut  timber and conceal and retain the deed the decree therefore be on the ground  of the execution of the deed of settlement on the valuable consideration of  marriage and that there be no defect therein save only the form of livery of  seize that the defendant shall deliver up to the plaintiff all the title deed  of the premise and also the say deed of settlement and that defendant shall  execute livery and seize thereon and by any other conveyance grant feoff and  confirm the premise to plaintiff and the heir of his body and the plaintiff be  to hold the premise free from all encumbrance make or do by the defendant and  all claim under he or his late father the settlor and that defendant shall  covenant to that purpose and a account of rend and profit by fall timber or  otherwise Reg lib b fol so in lee v sir Robert Henley other ante thorn v thorn  post bold v Corbet pre Ch saltern v Melhuish Amb but such conveyance or a  surrender shall not be supply in favour of a grandchild or a natural child  Watts v Papal bull p wms and case there cite nor of a husband moody v Reid mad  or grandchild very v Whitehead Ves