ambler case wheeler against caril Oct daughter entitle to a portion secure on  land marry clandestine in the lifetime of her father afterward the father  secure the portion to the husband on his make a settlement hold the settlement  be not fraudulent against the creditor of the husband No entry in lib Reg on  equity reserve query whether settlement by Mr caril on his wife after marriage  be voluntary and fraudulent against creditor Lord chancellor mrs caril be  entitle as daughter of Lord Molineaux to a moiety of pound secure by her  mother marriage settlement subject to the contingency of be lessen by the  birth of another daughter a marriage be clandestine have with Mr caril after  that Lord Molineux secure the pound on his estate and Mr caril make a  settlement upon her she be entitle to pound and no evidence appear that her  father intend her further bounty there be general principle well know a  settlement make before marriage be good against every body if it be in  consideration of marriage only if after marriage a settlement be make in  consideration of marriage only it be voluntary and fraudulent against creditor  this be also clear if after marriage her father or other person in  consideration of the husband make a settlement advance a sum of money such a  settlement will be good and for valuable consideration Prec Ch vide Remington  v hill and Prec in Ch anon cro James it will be good against a purchaser if a  young lady be entitle to a trust term which the husband can lie hold of and  possess nor get at without the assistance of this court if the trustee will  not raise the portion and the husband come for aid here the court will decree  a adequate settlement to be make on the wife and will support it as a good  settlement for valuable consideration Jones v marsh can in Eq in Lord Talbot  time the court have go further if after marriage the wife be entitle to such a  portion which the husband can touch without aid of the court and the trustee  will ambler not pay it without the husband make a settlement if the husband do  agree to it and do that which the court will decree it be a good settlement  against creditor question of this kind have come before the court in a case  report in vern in Lord cowpers time and before I in Jeuson v Vobe mich S c atk  nom Jeuson v Moulson vide more v Rycault Prec in Ch and Burnsdon v Stratton  Prec in Ch where the settlement on the issue be hold good though they be not  mention in the agreement this case be she be marry without a settlement  afterward the pound be secure suppose the money have be raise and pay in the  lifetime of the father and the settlement make on her in consideration of it  it will have be good after the death of the father the trustee see a  settlement make have pay Mr caril the money it will be the hard case in the  world to say under these circumstance she will lose the benefit of this  settlement therefore c note in the register minutebook that Oct there be the  follow entry Wheeler v Caryl this come to be hear on the master report cur let  bill stand dismiss out of this court as against the defendant the mortgagee  and trustee with cost to be tax by the master and without cost as against the  other defendant see Colville v Parker cro James anon Prec Ch Jones v marsh can  tempt Talb Russel v Hammond l atk brown v Jones atk Lanoy v duke of Athol atk  ware v Sheellet Ves Hilton v Briscoe Ves white v Thornborough pre Ch ambler er  p