case ball versus burnford Eq Abr pl S c Eq Abr c the wife join with the  husband in let in a encumbrance on her jointure land and bar the estate tail  and then limit the use to the husband for life remainder to the wife for life  remainder to their daughter the daughter be not purchaser so as to shut out a  judgement creditor of the husband antecedent to the bar of the estate tail but  the limitation to they voluntary unless the consideration of the wife part  with her jointure have extend also to the limitation to the daughter Edmund  Anderson be tenant for life of land then as to part to his wife for life for  her jointure then to the heir male of their two body acknowledge a judgement  to the plaintiff and then enter into covenant with I S that he and his wife  will join in a fine which shall be in the first place to I S and his heir by  way of mortgage for secure a sum of money then to the husband for life then to  the wife for life for her jointure then to thesons of they two in tail then to  the daughter in tail and a fine be levy accord and there be other encumbrance  upon the estate prior to the first settlement which I S the mortgagee or the  defendant burnford for who he be a trustee purchase in Edmund Anderson die  without issue male leave two daughter of that marriage who be likewise  defendant precedent in chancery plaintiff bring his bill to be let into the  benefit of his judgement pay the mortgagee what he have real pay for that by  the fine the estate tail be bar and the judgement let in and this settlement  on the daughter be voluntary it be admit that the fine have bar the estate  tail create by the first settlement but insist that the daughter be purchaser  by the mother join to bar her jointure and let in the encumbrance and that  that consideration do extend to the estate of the daughter as well as her own  my Lord keeper be of opinion that this may have be make a good consideration  for both but it be not express in the deed to be any consideration for settle  the estate upon the daughter but be a voluntary gift of the wife to her  husband and therefore the daughter estate must be take to be voluntary and so  a judgement creditor ought to have the assistance of this court before they