ashfield and ASHFIELDS case the case be a enfant copyholder make a lease for  year by word not warrant by the custom render rend the enfant at his full age  be admit to the copyhold and afterward accept of the rend the question be  whether this lease and the deception of the rend shall bind or conclude the  enfant Crawley sergeant argue that it be a void lease and that the acception  shall not bar he it be a ground in law that a enfant can do no act by bare  contract by word or by write can do any act which be a wrong either to himself  or unto another person or to his prejudice in this case if the lease shall he  effectual it be a wrong unto a stranger videlicet the lord and a prejudice  unto himself to make a forfeiture of the inheritance if a enfant command a to  enter into the land of S and afterward the enfant enter upon a a be the seize  and tenant and the enfant gain nothing so if a enter to the use of the enfant  and the enfant afterward agree to it in this case here be but a bare contract  and a agreement will not make a enfant a seize no more shall he he bind by a  bare deed or matter in write without livery h a enfant grant a advowson and at  full age confirm it all be void Br release two jointtenants one be a enfant  release to his companion it be a void release e a enfant make a lease without  reserve rend or make a deed of grant of good yet he shall maintain Godbolt er  p trespass nay though he deliver the good or lease with his own hand the same  will not excuse the trespass nor will it perfect the lease or make the grant  of the good good if the contract have but a mixture of prejudice to the enfant  it shall he void James in the king bench Hendloes and holiday case a  obligation make by a enfant with a condition to pay so much for his  apparol because the bind be with a penalty it be adjudge void if tenant at  will make a lease for year he be a seize at the commonlaw before the statute  of west cap lot e tenant at will make a lease for year e e but if a enfant he  tenant at will and he make a lease he be no seize in our case if he have make  livery then I confess it have be a defeasible forfeiture and he may have be  remit by his entry upon the lord Farrer for the plaintiff the lease be not  void Godbolt but voidable e Brian e h a enfant make a lease for year and at  full age accept of the rend the lease be good because the law say that he have  a recompense Com a lease for year the remainder for year render rend by a  enfant and afterward at his full agehe accept the rend of the particular  tenant it be a good confirmation of theestate of he in the remainder Litt if  he at full age confirm it be good which can not he if the lease be void and  yet in that case it do not appear that there be any rend reserve the enfant be  a copyholder make no difference in the case and in Murrels case c part it be  say that if a copyholder make a lease not warrantable by the customer it be a  forfeiture which prove it be a good lease otherwise it can not he a forfeiture  hill Elizabeth n the king bench rot east and Hardings case a copyholder make a  lease for three year by word to begin at Michaelmas next ensue it be a  forfeiture of the copyhold and a good lease betwixt the party hill James  Haddon and Arrowsmiths case one licence his copyholder for life to make a  lease for if he shall so long live and he make a lease for year and leave out  the word if he shall so long live yet because he be a copyholder for life and  so the lease do determine by his death and so he do no more then by law he may  do it be adjudge a good lease and no forfeiture otherwise if he have be a  copyholder in fee all condition in fact shall bind a enfant but not condition  in law c part Whittinghams case a enfant tenant for life or year make a feoff  in fee it be no forfeiture for if the lessor enter the ehfant may enter upon  he again yet it be a good feoff but he shall avoid it by enfancy but if it he  by matter of record then it be otherwise for if a enfant he lessee for life  and levie a fine it be a forfeiture and in that case if the lessor enter for  the forfeiture the enfant shall not enter again the same law if a enfant  commit waste which be against a statute it be a forfeiture and if the lessor  recover the place waste the enfant shall not enter again h a woman a enfant  who have right to enter into land take a husband and a dissent be cast yet she  shall avoid the dissent after the death of her husband The Court say that if  in the case at bar the enfant have be tenant in fee at the commonlaw and make  a lease without deed and have accept the rend at his full age that the same  have be good for that there he have a recompense but be a copyholder it be a  question Jones justice it be adjudge in the common plea in Peter case that if  a copyholder without licence make a lease not warrant by the customer that  such lessee shall maintain a ejection firm the coancel against the enfant in  the case at bar say that Godbolt the enfant make the lease as tenant by the  commonlaw for that he make it by conveyance of the commonlaw and so the lease  be voidable and not void and then the acceptance of the rend have make the  lease to be good it be adjourn to another day hill carom rot in the king bench