case ord against Blackett where a person be report by a master to be a fit  guardian to a natural child yet such guardian be not allow but the child be  place with the father who own her S c Eq ab one Ord who be seize of a estate  worth four hundred pound ayear have a natural daughter by sir William Blackett  to which daughter she devise all her estate and make her sister Martha Ord  executrix and appoint her to be guardian to the infant a that a mother can  appoint a guardian by will see Vaughan ex part Edward atk a and die the  executrix pursuant to the will sue for this estate but die soon after the suit  be begin have first appoint the now petitioner Ord executrix who renew the  suit and recover the land for the infant but sir William Blackett remove her  from school last Christmas and send her into the country where she have be  keep ever since for which reason the petitioner make application to the court  of chancery complain that the infant be remove from a school where she may  have proper and suitable education and send into the country where she can  have none this petition be refer to a master to name a proper school and a  guardian for this infant he report the petitioner to be a fit guardian and Mr  cavalries school a proper school for her education the petitioner therefore  petition that the child may be deliver to her and send to the say school  modern report the counsel for sir William Blackett the child father and who  own her as his daughter and who preserve this estate for her against the heir  at law consent to send the child to Mr cavalries school but oppose the  delivery to the petitioner or that she shall have the lie out any money for  clothes or other necessary for the child she be very poor and have already  pretend that she deserve one hundred and eighty pound for her care in attend  this child therefore the money to be lie out for necessary ought rather to be  pay to Mr cavalry or his wife than to the petitioner the court be of opinion  that remove this child from school into the country to sir William Blacketts  house can neither be useful or instructive to her because he be a single man  and keep no person proper for her education yet it be not think reasonable to  remove her from his care since he own her to be his child a see roach v Gouvan  vezey Mellish v dam Costa atk hark   light b note Hopkins case Peer wms ware v  saint Paul brown c c a but that he shall pay the cost of the petitioner  application to the court out of his own money for otherwise be may remove her  from one school to another and the cost of apply to this court will be pay out  of the infant estate