case Francis leak against the bishop OF Coventry and doctor babington  Michaelmas term Elizabeth roll presentation by turn to a church be a choose in  action if therefore the bishop deprive a clerk and without notice wrongful  collate and the patron afterward grant over the advowson the grantee can  present as in his turn upon the death of the incumbent Owen hob ld ray burr on  deprivation a collation by the bishop without notice be good against all  except the patron ante   a will in quare he foot soldier it be sufficient to  say he be seize of every second turn ut in young fig ante   light ld ray Leon  will quare hinder and count how one Langford be seize in fee de center point  ecelesix de S videlicet ad proesentandum ad the same ecdesiam quolihet primo  vice ut in young fig and that one Bushy be seize of the other moiety  ecclesiceprcedictce videlicet e ut in young fig and that Langford present his  clerk in the first turn who be admit institute and induct and afterward the  church hecame void and Bushy present in his turn who clerk be admit institute  and induct and afterward deprive and that the bishop without give notice of  the deprivation collate and that afterward Langford grant this advowson to the  earl of Salop in fee who grant it to the plaintiff in fee and that the clerk  collate by the bishop die and the defendant in right of Bushy claim the turn  and present and disturhed the plaintiff and it be thereupon demurrer after  argument it be adjudge for the defendant for when Langford have right to  present upon the deprivation as in his turn although the collation by the  bishop without notice be not good nor oust he but that he always may have  present and oust the incumbent by his bring of a quare he foot soldier yet it  be but a thing in action and when he have grant the advowson over the grantee  can have this thing in action nor the grantor can have the action but he have  destroy it sa as none can now have it second all the court hold that although  this grant be sufficient to pass the advowson in fee as they all agree that it  be and although this title to present have be transfer to the grantee Vet this  collation b the bishop be good against all but against the very patron and  this only through defect of notice so as he may have remove the incumbent by a  quare hinder but when he do not remove he croak Elizabeth er p so that he die  incumbent this be a serve of his turn and as a presentment in his nce but  shall have it now as turn so as bush shall not he prejudiced by his neglige in  his turn and it be a good plenarty and incumbency against he so as he now may  present and well say that the turn of the other be serve so as they all hold  for the matter to be against the plaintiff and Anderson and Warherton here  hold that the declaration be not good because it be not show how the  presentment by turn hegan but the other justice hold it to he well enough and  they all hold that the collation never gain the church but a usurpation gain  it so that the advowson can be grant over wherefore it be adjudge for the  defendant