case Charnock and his wife against Worsley Trinity term Elizabeth roll a  husband and wife levy a fine and the wife be within age they bring a writ of  error joint to reverse the fine adjudge that it shall he reverse in toto and  not quoad the wife only ante post roll Abr   b a cro James lev Hobart Plowd    light Leon I f n b Owen bro fin bro err co on pale yellow use dougl error the  case be baron and feme levy a fine the feme be within age the baron and feme  bring a writ of error and she be adjudge within age and if the judgement shall  he that the fine shall he reverse general or quoad the feme only be the  question of the plaintiff part two precedent be show Trin Henry rot Pas Henry  rot that the fine shall he reverse general and for the defendant a precedent  be show in Elizabeth that it shall he reverse quoad the feme only but there  the case be that the baron and feme levy a fine the feme be within age and the  baron die and she take a second husband and they bring writ of error and the  fine be reverse quoad the feme only and her heir and now it be argue by  Egerton and Golding of GraysInn that the fine shall he only reverse quoad the  feme and her heir and shall stand good against the baron for it may be that  the land be the inheritance of the baron which he may lawful convey and that  the feme be join only to bar her dower or that they be jointtenants before  marriage so he may well give his part and if it be the inheritance of the wife  yet he may dispose of it during his life and it shall not he reduce to he  against his own act coke and Atkinson contra it shall he intend the  inheritance of the wife if the contrary he not show as in Pigot case before  Wray c j when baron and feme join in a fine it shall he intend the inheritance  of the wife and not that they be jointtenants or tenant in common and if the  fine shall he reverse only as to the inheritance where shall the freehold he  and to who shall the conusee he attendant gawdy justice this matter be dubious  the court shall intend it to he rather the inheritance of the wife than  otherwise and the fine be the foundation of the conveyance it be reverse all  shall he restore as the case in Littleton sect the croak Elizabeth baron  discontinue the land of the feme and take a estate to he and his wife the wife  be remit and so be the husband though he can say so for she can be remit but  the husband must he also remit for they be one person and this fine shall he  reverse in all for it be error in law of the court and the b aron by the fifie  give nothing divide from the feme and all that passes from the wife shall he  reverse in all for the conveyance be in law erroneous as if a man confess a  action which be erroneous yet against his own act he shall avoid it by croak  Elizabeth er p error and if it shall he reverse quoad!the feme only then it  shall he a fiae levy by the husband only and so it will have discontinuance at  the commogjaw against the wife which be not reason and by the reversal of the  fine a particular interest e can be give to the conusee and if this fine shall  stand to bind the baron  then the baron can join in the writ of error for a  man can bring a action to reverse that which bind he but all the book be they  shall join in a writ of error Wray c j the baron give no more than the wife  eth with he and this give be error in court to receive the fine and if the  fine shall he reverse but eessabit execution during the life of the baron then  the wife shall not he restore to her inheritance live the baron which be not  reason and here be no mischief to any for if the conusee have make a feoff  scirefacias shall issue against he in which he may show and plead that it be  the inheritance of the baron and the conusee may have plead it and if he do  not the court will not help he and it be afterward adjudge that the fine shall  he reverse in tolo and Wray c j say he have conferrer with diverse other  justice and they be of the same opinion