c blithes case master of the roll sir Jo Churchill power execute by a feme  covert a widow have one child and be possess of a term for year just before  her marriage with the second husband assign this lease to two trustee without  the privity freeman er p of her husband in trust that she shall receive the  profit during life and afterward in trust for her child for life and afterward  upon such trust as she shall by any write sign in the presence of two witness  declare and appoint and then marry the husband enjoy the lease for several  year during the life of his wife and after the death of the wife the child  receive the profit during his life the wife during her coverture by the second  husband by deed under hand and sea in the presence of two witness appoint the  trustee after the death of the child to permit the defendant to receive the  profit during the residue of the term after the death of the child the  plaintiff be administrator to the husband prefer his bill against the trustee  to compel they to assign to he whereupon it be hold that this lease be a thing  of small value about pound per annum and there appear no treaty of marriage  nor freeman any contemplation ofthis lease nor any agreement concern it with  the husband that the assignment make to the trustee be not fraudulent against  the husband but that he shall be bind by it so as that the child after the  death of the wife shall hold it and if she have then limit it over the husband  have be bind by it a assignment in trust make before treaty for the second  marriage and no fraud practice by hold out that the term be unfetter by any  trust establish in the countess of Strathmore v bow Br it be hold that the  execution of this power by the wife after marriage be void and so the  plaintiff who be the administrator of the husband have the decree not but that  a feme covert may in many case execute a naked power but here this power be  couple with a interest which interest by the marriage do vest in the husband  this seem the sound reason for though it be hold in the case cite in the  margin that a feme covert can execute a naked power only yet it have be long  settle that a marry woman may execute a power couple with a interest if proper  create and that whether the power be appendant in gross or simple collateral  peacock v monk Ves wright v Cadogan Eden Dillon v grace Sch and Lef Daniel v  Uplee latch for the residue of the term be not dispose of in the first  settlement be a trust for the wife and by consequence be by marriage a trust  for the husband Bates v Dandy atk ante c p and note which the wife can not  dispose of without he