case addison versus Hindmarsh on point as to appeal to duchy court see  Wilbraham v Scarisbrick h l c eoden die in court Lord chancellor Eq can ab pl  S c the defendant plead himself heir on the part of the mother and do not say  he be heir of the whole blood plea over rule upon a bill of appeal from a  inferior court you need not assign particular error as you must do upon a bill  of review but you can examine de to make new upon either of those bill though  in the spiritual court they examine over and over again upon new allegation  the bill be to be relieve touch certain land which the plaintiff claim title  to as heir on the part of his father the defendant plead that the mother be  the purchaser of those land and that the defendant be heir on the part of the  mother but it not be plead that the defendant be heir of the whole blood to  the mother and in fact he be only of the half blood to the mother for that  reason the plea be overrule note in a bill by way of appeal from a inferior  court the plaintiff therein must complain of the injustice do he by the  inferior court but be not oblige Vernon chancery case to assign any particular  error which be the difference betwixt a bill of appeal and a bill of review  but in this they agree videlicet that both must be upon the same evidence and  you can examine de to make new and on the argument of the motion it be pray  that the plaintiff counsel will instance in what they will amend their and the  plaintiff counsel not instance any one particular wherein they will amend and  it appear to the court that the bring the proceed on the bill of review be  mere for delay c Reg lib b fol vide dunny v Filmore ante p though in the  spiritual court they examine over and over again and proceed upon new  allegation Vernon chancery case er p and the Lord chancellor seem to incline  that a bill of appeal will lie from a inferior court to the court of chancery  as to superior and inferior court vide stride v little ante vern as at  commonlaw the king bench correct all inferior court note that from the court  of equity at Lancaster a appeal by act of parliament lie to the duchy court et  vide Omerod v hardman Ves