ABREES case more of the case which you see before c henden argue that that  release be but special and that it extend only to error and first for that the  intention of the party be principal to be regard and ex to go before  consequence optima fit interpretation the precedent clause be only a release  of error and then the consequent suit and in the last clause release all  action and suit of error before second a release be particular and may be by  inference of other word have a general sense yet particular construction shall  make nisi to entangle opinion or thought a part for that also suit in the  middle of the clause shall have relation to the other word and to that purpose  be h dyer a grant to the lessee that be shall have the rue for hedge by the  assignment of the bailiff of the lessor and for necessary fuel to burn and the  opinion of the court be that he shall have the fuel also by assignment e a man  submit himself to the arbitrament of I S de omnibus act of follow continually  complaint and it be rule that that word personal refer to all and the case in  question be the very case as that in reason h a man grant the custody of his  park and all the windfall c and it seem there that the grant of windfall be  absolute for that that the intent can be otherwise Pasc Elizabeth banc roy  between pigeon and Gibson Norff the case upon the special verdict be in  trespass and pigeon the father make a feoff to his young son by which he grant  thus in all respects that messuagia of me property in east Bockham that late  be father urinate and since in the tenure of n d and c and it be adjudge that  that land do not pass by that feoff for where particular word be in the end  the middle shall never be take general and so also Rep althams case there it  be resolve that where it have particular word there all shall be of the same  nature c three expend encircling position thought nothing to come to know  which may be intend also in suit more than in right of way for cattle for will  you have action particular and suit general and so the intention appear in the  first word error and the subsequent be but declaratory and although that suit  be last put in the second clause yet there it be not but a surplusage and that  which be not release by the first suit can be by the second for it be not but  a repetition of that which be before Richardson the word be all writ action  and suit by error without question it shall be intend but error or if it be so  and all action and suit of error it can extend but to error Hutton in that  release there be not any word of debt and therefore it seem that the intention  be not to release other action but error and it be adjudge in this court in a  writ of annuity a release be plead that the plaintiff acquit he of one payment  for half of the year and release to he all action suit and demand and adjudge  that that release do not bar he but of the arrearage of a year hetley er p  hetley a quid law proclaim in a quid law proclaim the tenant be adjudge to  attourne and the question be whether he may attourne without be swear in court  to do fealty to his lessor and Brownlow chief prothonotary say that all the  precedent be that he shall attourne and do fealty by which the tenant be swear  to do fealty and the fealty be take for a authority