Barnardiston king b the king and the inhabitant OF melton vide Mr Abney now  come to show cause and say he do agree if this case have subsist upon the  statute of car this rend will have gain a good tenement but as it depend upon  the statute of W he submit it that it can not for the word in that last  statute be that no person come into a parish with a certificate shall gain a  settlement there unless he rend a tenement of per annum or execute a annual  office in such parish now the word such must be apply to the rend the tenement  as well as the execute the office and if so the rend the tenement must be in  such parish where he come with the certificate Mr reeves on the other side say  that he remember a case which be determine upon debate where the resolution of  the court be that the word in this statute and those in the statute of car  shall receive the same construction that case be mich Geo and the dispute  there be between the parish of saint John and the parish of Annwell accord the  court declare themselves to be of the same opinion and judge lee say he think  the word such that have be Barnardiston king b er p rely on may well be  confine to the execute office upon which Mr Abney take a exception to the  order of two justice for its remove the wife of John coke and six child  without ascertain the name of the six child or say that they be her six child  and in the case of the king and alder mich Geo which be a order of removal of  a woman and a bastardchild he remember both these exception take and the order  quash upon they in answer to this Mr reeves say that he well agree that the  complain part of the order be as have be mention but in the adjudicationpart  it be say that they be her child and therefore he hope that be sufficient  however the court be of opinion that this be necessary to be in the complain  part for upon that the adjudicationpart be find and accord they quash the  order of session in the whole and the order of two justice as to the child but  confirm it as to the wife king v inhabitant of Stilton barn KB er report date  the king and the inhabitant OF stilton vide this matter come on again the  exception by Mr Filmer seem to be that the name of the child be not mention  and not that it be not say it be their child the other side insist that Mr  Filmer do not cite any authority to show that this exception be ever allow the  chief justice say if this be the first case in which it be ever take he think  it ought to be allow and accord the court make the rule absolute for quash the  order as to the child