Bulstrode evely plaintiff against SLOULY defendant enter Trin James b r rot  trespass for a assault battery and imprisonment Ro r hob in a action of  trespass for a assault battery fine and for false imprisonment at Charlton the  defendant as to the assault and battery plead non culp and as to the false  imprisonment he justify the same at Ashberton in this manner set forth that  there the court be hold before he for the stannery he be the steward of this  court in which court there be a suit between the now plaintiff and another for  debt which suit there go against the now plaintiff who be condemned in the  suit and take by his command and in execution for this until he shall pay it  and his fine which be the same imprisonment and justify and take a travers S  without hoc that he be worthy of blame in any place extra curian Stannerioe  upon this plea the plaintiff demurrer in law Hele for the plaintiff this plea  be vicious and repugnant in it self have first to all the trespass plead non  culp and afterward unto parcel make a justification he do justify the  imprisonment and do not show that there be any imprisonment by he and so not  good as to the traverse this be not good but a idle traverse the action be  bring against the defendant for a false imprisonment of he at Charlton in  county c he be steward of the stannery court then hold he do travers without  hoc that he be culpable out of the StaDDery court at Asbberton this travers be  not good for by l e fol in a false imprisonment if he do justify for a special  reason he ought to traverse both the time precedent and subsequent and so be h  fol here he ought to have take a travers in this manner S without hoc that he  be guilty at Charlton or in any other place out of the stannery court George  croak for the defendant the action here be for a assault battery and  imprisonment at Charlton in his justification be show that he be steward of  the stannery court there that a bill be there exhibit before he against the  plaintiff for a debt of and for want of bail he commit he to prison until be  pay the debt and fine and take a traverse without hoc that he be after  culpable in any place out of the jurisdiction of the stannery court there this  plea be good in law and no repugnancy in it in a suit there he ought to have  his manucaptors or to be commit the court of Stanneryes here be a ancient  court and have be confirm by diverse parliament as to the traverse be the  principal matter it be show that January the commitment be just without hoc  that he be guilty afterward out of the stannery court of necessity here he be  only to travers the time subsequent if he do not justify the imprisonment the  same day as the plaintiff have lie the same to be then the course of plead be  to travers the time before as well as the time after but otherwise not so as  it have be here resolve in a assault battery and imprisonment if he justify  the imprisonment the same day he needs not to traverse the time before here he  be condemned and in execution till he pay the without hoc that culpable after  the same day which Bulstrode er p he justify or in any other place out  Bulstrode of the Stanner court also he needs not to travers the place as  appear by h fol and h where a special justification in one county he be not to  travers further also the point of the traverse be but matter of form as it be  resolve Elizabeth in one blunt case and the law will intend Charleton to be  within the stannery so that the plea in bar here be good and the demurrer be  generali without cause show Haughton justice the place where the court be be  Charleton or Chalterton and your justification be local S at Ashberton and so  not good dodderidge justice you ought to have say in your traverse without hoe  that you be guilty at Charlton or in any other place extra jurisdiction Curho  Stannerim you have answer the first exception well for by Assisar fol plea  something ought to be offer to make a assault word will not do it there the  hold up of a hatchet be a assault nor a command to one to have he imprison the  exception to the traverse for the time be well answer but not for the place  and for this cause the traverse as here it be take be not good croak justice  as touchina the dlace whether the same be within the jurisdiction of the  stannery court or out of it non constat Curi a so the court at this time seem  to be all of opinion that the travers here be not good because he therein  answer nothing to Charlton the place where dodderidge he ought not here to  travers the time before and notwithstanding this exception the travers be good  but not for the other defect in it and so this cause be by the court adjourn  till the next terrae for the defendant then to show better cause or judgement  to be give for the plaintiff afterward S termin mich James b r this matter be  move again croak justice demand whether Charlton the place of the imprisonment  be within the jurisdiction of the stannery dodderidge by this plea here it do  not appear whether this place be within or without the same Haughton you have  here answer bene but not plene t trespass be lie in the declaration to be at  Charlton no answer be here make as to this and we can know unless the same be  special show unto we by he by his plea where this Charlton S Ashberton be lie  to be within the stannery no good answer by this plea be here make to this  declaration as to the repugnancy allege this be not material here money be to  be pay but this be no part of the trespass it be not comprehend within the  matter of the imprisonment here be a good justification of the imprisonment  dodderidge the travers here be not good for by this it do not appear what the  jurisdiction of the stannery court be nor how far the same do extend it self  the trespass here for the imprisonment be lie to be at Charleton he plead a  suit between the plaintiff and another in Ashberton that the plaintiff in the  suit there be condemned and imprison until he pay the debt and fine with a  traverse absqua hoc that he be guilty alibi extra curian of the stannery this  be not good for by this plea in this manner without hoc that he be guilty in  any place in county Devon out of the jurisdiction of the court of Stanneryes  by this it do not at all appear unto we whether Charleton be within or out of  the stannery and if it be within the same then here be no answer by this plea  unto this and therefore the plea not good otherwise it will be if this be out  of the Stanneryes but this be altogether uncertain if he plead non culp to the  imprisonment he shall not then plead to the fine otherwise it be where he  plead non culp and justify the imprisonment there he be to answer to the fine  for the imprisonment be for the fine so where be make a special justification  there he ought also to answer to the fine and so be the difference croak agree  herein that the travers here be not good for there be no answer Bulstrode here  make by this unto the imprisonment at Charleton but as to the matter of  repugnancy there be none here curian the whole court absent coke chief justice  agree herein clear for the reason aforesaid that the plea and travers bear be  not good and so by the rule of the court judgement be give for the plaintiff  Bulstrode er p