case Kettleby versus atwood of the eighth month in court Lord chancellor Eq  can ab pl SC ante case this cause come on to be reheard and the question now  be between the wife and the heir on the part of the husband who shall have the  money after the death of the wife the wife be administratrix both to her  husband and her child and the court decree for the heir that the money be bind  by the article and shall be for the benefit of the heir as the land shall have  go in case the money have be lie out accord to the article and the case of  Whittick and Jermin be cite which have be late decree by this chancellor and  be a case in point and the chancellor say he remember the case of Laurence and  Beverley t keb see the case of Laurence v Beverley state in Baden v earl of  Pembroke post vol upon a special verdict before the Lord Ch justice hale in  which himself be of counsel and be there rule that the money be not asset to  satisfy a creditor but be bind by the article so Scudamour v Scudamour pre Ch  per Lord Macclesfield lancey v Fairchild post vol et vide on this head  Wheldale v partridge before the master of the roll Ves and on appeal where  decree of master of the roll confirm Ves in which the doctrine of conversion  of real or personal property as between the real and personal representative  be much discuss and the case full state see the note to this case ante in the  argue of this case it be insist for the defendant that the wife by the article  have a election in case her husband die without issue whether she will have  the Vernon chancery case land or the money and have six month time to make  this election after the death of the husband and although the husband have  issue at his death yet that issue die within the six month and therefore the  wife may elect say non allocatur for the husband have issue at his death he  can not be say to die without issue Vernon chancery case er p so no election  can arise to the wife where in a marriage settlement there be a proviso that  if the wife shall happen to survive the husband not have issue or without  issue lawful beget between they then the wife to have power to dispose of such  land the husband die leave issue which issue sometime after die without issue  et per Cowper Lord chancellor the wife have sufficient power to sell these  land holt v Burleigh pre Ch et vide Pulteney v Darlington bro Ch Rep and the  case of Goodier and clark be cite in siderfin part foe