case graham versus stamper noise Max Doct and Stud dial c vern S c Eq Abr pl S  c a servant bespeak thing for his master and also for himself of the same  tradesman how far he shall be liable for the good of his master a servant to  king James relieve against a judgement at law for lace c deliver for the king  use just before his abdication on the circumstance of the case whereby it  appear the defendant never take the plaintiff in his own person to be liable  but have always be pay out of the privy purse the plaintiff Graham be privy  purse to king James the second and also master of his buck hound the defendant  be a laceman and by his friend make interest precedent in chancery er p to the  plaintiff that he may be make use of to furnish lace c for the king hunt c and  be employ accord and Graham do likewise deal with he on his own private  account and he be from time to time pay for what he furnish for the king  livery out of the privy purse but on king James go away the defendant bring  Indebitat Assump precedent in chancery against Graham as well for what he have  furnish for the king use as for what he have furnish for Graham own particular  use and recover for both this bill be bring to be relieve against that  judgement the court go on these circumstance in the case that stamper have be  permit to furnish lace and fringe c for the king on his own desire and  application make to Graham on his behalf that the entry in the daybook of such  good as be deliver for the king use be without price that they may be add in  the leidgerbook high or low as they have a prospect of soon or late payment  that the defendant have from time to time be pay out of the privy purse and  one witness have swear that the defendant be pay say that he expect payment  from the privy purse and not elsewhere that the account of the good deliver to  the king use have beenpaid off to about ten month but the account deliver on  Graham private score be of four year continuance which show stamper keep they  as distinct account that none of the good deliver for the king use come to  Graham nor be there any particular promise of his to pay for any of they and  therefore if the law shall be that he who speak for or fetch good for his  master without any particular promise of pay for they be liable to pay for  they which they seem to doubt yet on the particular circumstance of this case  it will be fit to consider how far use shall be make of this judgement as to  the objection that the damage at law be entire can not be sever and apportion  by this court the court answer that the defendant have already do that by his  answer and the schedule annex to it have therein set forth how much Graham own  proper debt be and how much for good deliver for the king and in doubtful case  it be most prudent precedent in chancery to try their fortune at law before  they come into this court and that therefore the proceed that have be at law  ought not to be object for if this court can relieve after judgement at law it  can correct the rigour of the law at all for till judgement it may be very  doubtful what the law be Trevor say it be a lease of great consequence but of  very little doubt but because of the great noise and discourse that have be  make about it they order a master to state it on the book answer proof and  plead and then the court will direct for how much execution shall be take out