a seize in fee of Blackacre and Whiteacre have two sister e and f and have b a  son by a former wife and on his marriage with m a second wife he convey the  whole to W r and W S and their heir to the use follow videlicet Blackacre to a  himself for ninetynine year if he so long live and after the expiration to the  use of the say m for a jointure and after her death to the use of the heir  male of the body of the say a remainder to a s right heir and as to Whiteacre  to the use of a for ninetynine year if c and after to the trustee and their  executor for two hundred year in trust to raise portion for his child by m  remainder to the heir male of the body of a remainder to his right heir the  marriage take effect and after a die leave b his son by his first wife and h  and I daughter by m his second wife m enter into Blackacre b enter into  Whiteacre and cause part of the rend to be pay to the trustee towards raise  portion pursuant to the settlement and grant lease c and die without issue in  m s life afterward m die his honour be of opinion that the limitation of  Whiteacre be void mich pound Ann I rawley and holland vin Abr pl h and as to  what have be urge that a use arise by operation and construction of law his  honour mid that to talk of raisin a use by implication be a mystery in law  which he do not understand and will have decree Whiteacre to the sister of b  but upon the importunity of the defendant counsel a case be state and send to  the judge of c b who certify Nov that as to Blackacre nothing but a reversion  expectant on m s estate for life descend to b so that by her enjoy the land  and survive b there be no possession brother to exclude h and I the sister by  the second venture from inherit as heir to a their father but as to Whiteacre  they hold the limitation to the heir male of the body of a void no freehold be  limit to any person precedent to that estate and that no estate of freehold  can result to a for his life by implication because another estate videlicet  for ninetynine year if c be express limit to he which will be inconsistent  with a freehold in he by equity case abridge er p implication and that a  freehold either express or imply be necessary to support such limitation and  consequent the freehold and inheritance in feesimple of Whiteacre descend to b  expectant only on a term for year to the trustee of which there be such a  possession brother as entitle e and f the plaintiff ant and heir of the whole  blood to b the son to that land ibidem rich v Beaumond equity case abridge er  a conveyance be to such use as shall be by will direct the use declare by the  will be that the trustee shall convey to the use of a till b come of age or be  marry and after such age or marriage one moiety to a for life and if b shall  die during his minority then all the estate to a but if b shall attain such  age or marry then one moiety in possession and the reversion of the other to b  and his heir the question be whether this be a use execute by the statute and  it be send to the judge for their opinion Feb rich and Beaumond vin Abr pl