case Dorrell against collins a exception in a lease which go to the whole  thing demise be void post hob wood Sh touch in convey a interest under a  administration grant by a archbishop it need not he show how administration be  grant post cro James lev b ab salk dougl a term hold in autre law will not  pass by a grant of all my good and chattel S post ejection firm upon not  guilty the jury find that the master and scholar of the college of Sinkford be  seize in the time of Henry of the manor of Hodley of which the place c be  parcel and let all their land in Lamhehurst except the manor of Hodley in ken  and Sussex to I S for year and they further find that the master and scholar  have no other land in Lamhehurst than the say manor the question be if the  manor passes by the lease and all the court hold that it be find they have no  other land than the manor the exception be void because it go to the whole  thing demise otherwise of a exception of part but a exception be take to the  declaration because the plaintiff convey his interest by a administrator to  who the archbishop of Canterbury do grant administration of all the good of  the lessee in ken and Sussex but do not show how the archbishop grant it  either as ordinary or by his prerogative and this be hold by all the court a  material exception but it v as afterward allege that all the precedent in this  court and in the common plea be so in general without special show how and for  that they will not change the precedent they disallow the exception and in  this case it be hold that if a administrator do grant in all respects good el  catalla svan a term which he have as administrator do not pass for it be not  suum but he have it in right of the croak Elizabeth intestate but if one have  a lease as executor or administrator of the manor of d and he grant all his  right and interest in the manor the term which he have as executor do pass for  he have no other right in it and his intent be to pass it but by general word  it shall not pass a