case arnold wear against Perkins Hilary term James roll in debt on a quantum  to deserve for work and labour as a tailor the declaration need not state  either the day or place where perform and after verdict the court will presume  the good be deliver to the plaintiff dougl error of a judgement in the common  plea where in debt he declare that on the that Oct James at London in such a  parish the defendant retain he quod to adapt et to make together for he a  doublet and hose and for that purpose that he buy so much satin at such a  price and other thing at such a price et to adapt et to make together for he a  doublet and hose and deserve for his labour so much which in all amount to so  much per quod action to grow progressively the defendant plead non debet and  find for the plaintiff and judgement give accord and error assign by Bridgman  first that he say quod to adapt et to make together and do not show the day  nor place and that be issuable croak throw second because he do not show that  he deliver they to the plaintiff or be ready to deliver they and for these  cause upon the first motion all the court absent lea hold it to be erroneous  and give rule to have the judgement reverse but two day after Coventry  attorney general move it again and produce a lev side hard salk croak James er  p the hand of all the prothonotaries of the common plea that declaration in  debt be usual in that form neither mention the day nor place of the make but  in a action upon the case in a assumpsit they use to mention both and the  reason thereof as Coventry urge be because in debt the defendant may gage his  law and the time or place of the make shall not be traverse but in a action  upon the case it be issuable and therefore ought to be allege to the second  point he ought not to allege delivery but shall come on the other part if he  will bar he of his action for it be say that a tailor shall not be compel to  bring they home or deliver they until he be pay for they or be satisfy upon  the delivery and that be to be prove upon evidence wherefore for these cause  the judgement be afterward affirm and all the court absent lea different  opinion hold it to be well enough especial after verdict Langley v pain James  er report date case langley against pain if a venire facias de to make new be  award the first verdict notwithstanding it be continue on the record and right  as to one of the defendant be a nullity ante roll ab cro Elizabeth salk where  the verdict be imperfect a venire facias de to make new be award and then a  general verdict give against both defendant whereby they be find guilty and  now move in arrest of judgement that this be a void verdict at least as to the  wife because before by the first verdict she be find not guilty which appear  upon the same roll whereupon the venire facias be award and as to her the  verdict be perfect and the venire facias be award for the trial of that which  be imperfect the then find here of the same trespass that she be guilty where  the contrary be find before be mere a void verdict and all the court hold that  the first verdict be mere void by reason of the imperfection therein and be as  no verdict and all that be find therein be void and not to be respect although  it be enter in the same roll wherefore the second verdict be good be find upon  better evidence and it be adjudge for the plaintiff