case the king against SANCKY and tipper where statute give a remedy for what  be before suable in the spiritual court unless the statute alter the offence  or punishment the jurisdiction be not take away S c holt S c ld ray the  defendant be quaker be commit to Worcester gaol for refuse to answer on their  solemn affirmation in a cause of substraction of tithe or other ecclesiastical  duty and it be move they may be discharge because in the statute will c S for  permit quaker solemn affirmation there be a clause appoint a speedy remedy  against quaker for tithe videlicet by complaint to a justice of peace which  take away the spiritual jurisdiction for where the common or statute law give  remedy in door secular whether the matter be temporal or spiritual the  conusance of that cause belong to the king temporal court unless the  jurisdiction of the spiritual court be save or allow by the same statute    light b Jo but by holt chief justice the remedy appoint by the law for tithe  against quaker seem only a additional remedy the ecclesiastical and temporal  court have herein a concurrent jurisdiction as in the case of a pension  Payable out of a parsonage by prescription notwithstanding the opinion of my  Lord coke on the statute of circumspect to put in motion you may sue in the  spiritual court for the same though a writ of annuity lie also at commonlaw  but where the statute alter the offence and make it of a high degree there it  take away the ecclesiastical jurisdiction as in case of polygamy after a man  have be try for the same so in case of a bastardchild where a man have be  adjudge the repute father of it they can proceed for slander on that account  then another exception be take that they be commit for not pay tithe modern  report or other ecclesiastical duty in the disjunctive without show certain  for what the suit be for though the word of the statute be in the disjunctive  yet in the commitment it shall be precise show and for this exception the  defendant be discharge