case seal versus seal see lion v Mitchell mad pre Charles Eq can ab pl pl pale  yellow Rep one devise all his money in the government fund to be lie out in  the purchase of land of or pound per annum to be settle on the old son and the  heir male of his body remainder to the second son and the heir male of his  body c and devise the rest of his personal estate to his old son and the heir  male of his body remainder to his second son c the personal estate can be  entail but the whole vest in the old son where or pound per annum be direct to  be purchase the court will take it in the large sense and construe it to be  pound per annum one devise that all his money in the governmentfunds shall be  lie out in a purchase of land of or pound a year and settle on his old son a  and the heir male of his body remainder to his second son b and the heir male  of his body c and bequeathe the rest of his personal estate to a and the heir  male of his body remainder over in the same manner Lord chancellor it be clear  the personal estate can be entail but the whole property thereof vest in a as  to the other devise will construe it in the most liberal sense and it be  direct that land of or pound per annum shall be purchase it shall be pound per  annum peer William and though it be insist that this be the case of money  direct to be lie out in land be to be construe like marriagearticle where land  be covenant to be settle upon the husband and the wife and the heir male of  the body of the husband in which case the court will order a strict settlement  videlicet to the father for life remainder to the first c son to the intent  that the husband may not bar it and for the same reason shall do so here peer  William er p yet Lord chancellor say this case differ for that in marriage  article the child be consider as purchaser vide ante bale v Coleman but in the  ease of a will as this be where the testator express his intent to give a  estate tail a court of equity ought not to abridge the bounty direct by the  testator so Butterfield v Butterfield ves Stratton v pain bro p c and Edward  bro p c earl of Chatham v Tothill bro p c r and Edward bro p c Pelham v  Gregory bro p c and Edward bro p c duke of Montague v Lord Beaulieu bro p c  Chandless v price Ves Massey v Hudson mere so Blackburn v stable v b Lincoln v  Newcastle Ves Stratford v Powell I ba be Jervoise v Northumberland I W  Deerhurst v saint Alban mad