c Cloberry v LAMPDEN SC Eq can ab Ventr Ch can and confirm on appeal to the  house of lord see journal of house of lord vol p legacy when go to the  executor a give to b pound when she shall attain the age of twentyone year or  be marry which shall first happen to be pay with interest a die and b die  before the age of twentyone freeman year or marriage the question be whether  the executor of a or of b shall have the legacy and resolve that the executor  of b shall have it for this be a present duty though the to loosen be in going  to be and it be not a contingent gift as it will have be if the word to be pay  with interest have be omit tailor v wood Nelson Rep where the case in the text  above be cite as it be in Stapleton v cheese vern and approve for now it be  all one as if he have say I give b pound to be pay with interest when he shall  attain the age of twentyone year or be marry which without question have vest  in b and his executor shall have have it if he have die and it be likewise  rule in this case that the executor be of full age shall have it present in  the anon case vern it be say it be decide in the principal case that though  the administrator of b be entitle to the legacy he must wait for it till such  time as b will have attain the age of twentyone year but the last editor Mr  Raithby in his note ad loc correct the mistake if the legacy though a vest one  have not be Payable till a certain fix period and no interest give in the  intermediate time the administrator must have wait otherwise in such a case  the personal representative of the original testator will be deprive of a  benefit apparent intend for they but where they be to be Accountable for  interest the same reason do not exist as observe above the distinction be full  establish by express decision Crickett v dolby Ves green v Pigot Br fonnereau  v fonnereau Ves sen but give a yearly sum by way of maintenance be not  equivalent to give interest for the purpose before advert to Chester v painter  p wms hanson v Graham Ves Reg lib a fol decree that the defendant do pay to  the plaintiff the say legacy of pound with interest from the testator death as  soon as asset of the testator be forthcoming for the designation of the  payment of it at the age of twentyone year be by reason of the incapacity of  the legatee before that time to manage it which reason cease in the executor  and when it be to be pay with interest it be the same I thing to the executor  for it will be no advantage to he to keep it in his hand so long as he pay  interest for it and Keck tell I that he have know it rule that when a legacy  be give in that manner to be pay without interest and the legatee die before  the age of payment that the executor have a decree for it present for that it  be debt is owed though not to loosen present and the designation of the time  be by reason of the incapacity of the person till then say quaere de Ceo car  semble Q be un grand difference enter less case for here by the will of the  testator the interest go to the benefit of the executor freeman er p freeman  de term S mich in curian porter