argyle vers hunt No prohibition after sentence though word whore appear to be  speak in London fort SC cite Atl and see vin Abr libel in the spiritual court  for the word whore which upon the face of the libel appear to have be speak in  London and after sentence Corbet move for a prohibition because the defect of  jurisdiction appear in the libel itself and the court will judicial take  notice of the custom of London where a action lie for the word whore show roll  Abr roll Abr lev sty Inst b Ketelby contra it be now too late and it shall  have be plead below Lutw et per curian the rule be that you shall never allege  matter dehors the libel as a ground for a prohibition after sentence but the  foundation of our grant it must arise out of the libel itself in defect of  strange jurisdiction and if there be a defect of jurisdiction appear in the  libel then the party never come too late for the sentence and all other  proceed be a mere nullity smith v Langley Cas tempt hard head et ux v winter  bunb Paxton v knight bar full v Hutchins Cowp but where the spiritual court  have a original jurisdiction which be to be take from they upon account of  some matter arise in the suit as for defect of trial there after sentence the  party shall never have a prohibition because he himself have acquiesce in  their manner of trial which be a waiver of the benefit of a commonlaw trial it  be true these word appear to be speak in London but how do the custom of  London appear to we there be nothing of that in the libel and though we have  such a private knowledge of it that upon motion we do not put the party to  produce a affidavit because the other side never dispute it yet we can  judicial take notice of it and if any body will insist on a affidavit we must  have it in every case hartop v hoar post Surbi et ux v York and hind v  Thompson ib driver v driver ib theyer v Bastwick burr buggin v Bennet ib Caton  v Burton Cowp it be never know that the court judicial take notice of private  custom but they be always special return mich Ann stone v foul there be a  prescription for the parishioner to repair the fence of the churchyard and  after sentence they come and suggest that the rector be bind to those repair  and that the spiritual strange report er p court in as much as the  prescription be not admit have no power to proceed but the court hold they  come too late after sentence vide cook v Wingfield post fort buggin v Bennet  burr full v Hutchins Cowp Blacquire v Hawkins Doug but it be there lie down  the where a custom of London have be once certify the court must take notice  of it and need not have it certify over again a prohibition be deny