case clayton against Gillam trespass quare enclosed space to break in pieces  and dig up slate lie with a continuando be good for the continuance shall be  refer to that trespass which may be continue SC vent SC Jones SC lev SC skin  trespass for break open the plaintiff close and dig up his slate c with a  continuando transgression predict c exception be take to the continuation by  sir Francis Wythens in arrest of judgement a see ante Tomlinson v freeman a  prohibition grant after sentence and appeal it appear upon the libel itself  that the cause be without the jurisdiction of the court ante S p roll Abr salk  burr Cowp term Rep bunb term Rep b r h but if the want of jurisdiction do not  appear on the face of the libel the court will not grant a prohibition after  plea Anonymous ante roll Abr or sentence pronounce burr dougl unless if some  temporal matter incidental arise they refuse such proof as the temporal court  allow cro Elizabeth show Mod but prohibition shall not go after sentence on  account of the spiritual court have cognizance of part of the charge only and  not of the rest term Rep a SC skin say that judgement be arrest for not show  how seize for unless he be seize in fee he can not prescribe and that upon the  case be move again the court hold their former opinion see also S p down v  Gashford Com Rep S p pepin v Bustine ante a this statute as far as it relate  to the take of the oath be repeal by will mary c S see hawk p c ch sect to  sect shower KB er p but hold good enough be general and the continuando may  and shall be refer to that which may be a continue trespass and here be by the  court mention the case of Litchfield v Elliot a in this court about logwood  but answer by the court that there it be restrain to the throw so many  particular piece on the ground and in confirmation of this their resolution be  cite the case of Howel v Reynolds b about four year since in this court  videlicet trespass be bring for take and carry away oyster in separali  piscaria of the plaintiff with a continuando as to the take and upon motion in  arrest of judgement it be hold well enough and that there may be a continuance  thereof and for this be cite a Anonymous case Brownl where a continuando of a  trespass be lie in break and enter his house for diverse day together which be  there object to be a new trespass every time he shower KB enter the house but  the court hold it be well enough for that the continuando be only for  aggravation of the damage and see f n b l that a continuando may be as well  for break a house as for eat of grass