case in the matter of the SIMPSONS bankrupt December the saint former where  there be several partner the custom be to take out separate commission against  eachpartner as well as a joint commission but this be of late think a very  unreasonable practice and occasion great confusion with regard to bankrupt  effect have be discountenance and the court keep only one Commission on foot  and direct distinct account to be keep of the several estate John Simpson the  elder and Thomas Simpson his cousin be partner for a special purpose atkins er  p John the elder Thomas and John the young be also partner a commission be  take out against John the elder and Thomas John the elder afterward die a  second commission be then take out against John the young and Thomas afterward  Thomas die a separate commission be now take out against John the young the  present petition be present on behalf of the assignee under the second  commission to supersede the separate commission as separate creditor may by  order come in and prove their debt under the former commission Mr solicitor  general for the petition creditor in the separate commission cite ex part  Rollinson that of February to show notwithstanding a joint commission be  depend that separate creditor may take out a separate commission the case cite  be as follow Rollinson be a bind creditor of a and b a joint commission be  take out against they and also two separate commission Rollinson prove his  debt under the joint commission and afterward petition to be admit a creditor  under each of the separate commission Lord Talbot will not grant the petition  because it will break in upon the rule of equality among creditor under  commission of bankruptcy establish in this court but give the petitioner a  fortnight to make his election whether he will come under the joint or the  separate commission and will not supersede the separate commission atkins Lord  chancellor former where there be several partner they use to take out separate  commission against each partner as well as a joint commission this practice be  of late think a very unreasonable one as occasion great confusion with regard  to bankrupt effect have be discountenance the present case be one survive  partner of three person the joint effect vest in he in law and under this  commission may be proper distribute a creditor by bind upon the partnership  after a joint commission be de end take out a separate commission against John  Simpson the young so rat now here be two commission against the same person  which will create endless confusion and seem to I to be only a struggle for  the assigneeship and the clerkship for there be no doubt but this particular  creditor may have a satisfaction under the first Commission his lordship  therefore order the last commission to be supersede and by consent of the  assignee the first be supersede likewise and the creditor in general be order  to come to a new choice of assignee under the second the now only subsist  commission his lordship also give direction that there shall be distinct  account keep of the several estate and reserve the disposition of the effect  for the consideration of the court b this opinion of Lord chancellor it shall  seem for the future that where there be a joint commission depend separate  creditor ought not to take out a separate commission but apply for a order to  be admit to come in and prove their debt under the joint commission as be a  mean of save a expense to the creditor N B his lordship have former upon a  application of joint creditor to be admit to prove their debt under a separate  commission order it provisional that they shall be admit creditor and assent  or dissent to the bankrupt certificate because the certificate otherwise will  clear he of the debt of joint creditor as well as separate but it seem now  settle that a joint commission can be support while a separate one be subsist  ex part proudfoot post cook b law in margin Martin v ohara Cowp say vide ex  part Hardcastle cook b law vide ante the case ex part baudier December the d  which seem to vary from the present case