case Bromfield against Chichester saint Aug if a bill be refer for scandal and  impertinence and so report exception be take to the report and allow the  plaintiff shall have the cost of the reference but he shall not on exception  be allow to the master report of irregularity No entry in l r S c not S p dick  the defendant obtain a order to refer the bill for scandal and impertinence  and the master report it scandalous and impertinent exception be take to the  master report and allow and on that may last a order be then obtain by the  plaintiff to have his cost of the reference tax and pay by the defendant and  be make without notice motion be make on the that to discharge that order when  a precedent of freke v Culpepper be produce by the plaintiff counsel the Lord  chancellor refuse to discharge the order the defendant have since ambler  discover several order of the like kind which be discharge the defendant apply  by petition to discharge the order of the that may and insert the precedent in  the petition upon hear the petition Lord chancellor take a distinction between  this case and the precedent they be for irregularity which happen every day  but this for a imputation upon the plaintiff charge he false with have insert  scandal and impertinence in his bill and if such reference be to be encourage  every bill will be stuff with impunity therefore as it be a reflection upon  the party and cost be discretionary he refuse the petition freke v Culpepper  before sir John strange master of the roll that may reference for irregularity  and report irregular and on exception to master report which be allow a order  be then obtain without notice to tax the cost of the reference Knighty dekin  that July reference for irregularity in take interrogatory and deposition and  the master report they irregular take exception to the master report and allow  a order be then obtain by petition to the master of the roll to tax the cost  of the reference and upon application afterward discharge by Lord Hardwicke  Stevens v long saint Nov dick the defendant procure a reference for  irregularity in sue out process of contempt for want of a answer and the  master report in his favour but the report be set aside on exception take  thereto and on the that April the plaintiff obtain a order of the late Lord  Hardwicke for defendant to pay the cost of the reference and the master in  pursuance of such ambler er p order tax the cost and make a report thereon but  before the same be pay videlicet on the that Aug the defendant prefer his  petition to his lordship sit as aforesaid and that the defendant long be  advice that the say order of the that April be irregular for that the master  have report in favour of he the defendant the plaintiff therefore ambler be  not entitle to cost no more than a plaintiff in error at law be entitle to  cost and therefore the defendant lon pray by his say petition that the say  order of the that of April may be set aside for irregularity with cost and  that proceed thereon may be stay till the hear the petition his lordship take  the matter into consideration and consult with his secretary and registrar  thereon and direct they to search for precedent and upon the aforesaid  precedent of knight v Delcin be produce to his lordship by his registrar his  lordship order a attendance upon the say petition and that all proceed under  the say order of that April shall in the mean time be stay the petition be  hear before his lordship on saint November when his lordship make a order for  discharge his order of the that of April at the same time say that he do it  not only on account of the say precedent of knight v dekin but from the reason  of the case that July nugent v Jones a reference for irregularity be direct to  a master at the defendant request and the master make his report in favour of  the plaintiff whereupon defendant except to the report and Lord Henley  chancellor allow the same and on that July the defendant serve a notice of  motion that the plaintiff may pay he the cost of the reference to be tax which  motion be on the that of say July debate by counsel on both side and reject  see Purcell v MNamara Ves beam on cost