case Nicholls versus how and porter all e contra Nov pre Ch S c from what time  the land of a receiver of the crown be bind by the statute of Elizabeth can  when the king receiver be seize of the inheritance and there be a term for  year attend the inheritance the term be bind as well as the inheritance but if  the king receiver be possess of a term in gross and it be assign before a  actual extent the assignment be good against the crown Bevis Loyd have first  purchase a long term for year in the LambInn and of other house in saint  clement parish and afterward purchase the inheritance he afterward become  receiver of north Wales and have occasion for pound assign over the term by  way of mortgage to I S afterward on the marriage of Evan Loyd his son he  settle the house in saint clement inter alian on himself for life remainder to  Evan Loyd and the heir of his body there be issue of the marriage a daughter  now the wife of porter after this Bevis Loyd mortgage these house to Mr John  Nicholls for pound the king extend these house for the debt of Bevis Loyd and  Nicholls get a assignment of the extent and a privy seal for the debt Vernon  chancery case first resolve that by the statute of queen Elizabeth the land  and real estate of Bevis Loyd be bind and stand liable to answer the king debt  although he be not actual a debtor to the king nor any extent against he in  several year after second that where a term be attendant on the inheritance if  the king extend the inheritance he shall have a right to the term so where  escheat of the inheritance Thruxton v attorneygeneral ante Vol but if it be a  term in gross and assign before any actual extent the assignment will stand  good and the term not liable to the king debt there be in the register book d  Nov a long entry of plead in a cause relate to the lamb inn but no point of  the nature of those state in the print report occur Reg lib b fol enter Nicol  v bellers vide sir Gerard fleetwood case Rep attorneygeneral v Alston Mod