case in chancery the eastindia company contra MAINSTON to have a account of  his employment and charge he with such diverse deceit and omission in his book  of account which he have send and deliver to which the plaintiff plead the  case on the plea be videlicet factor of eastindia company to reaccount the  company have one chief factory at Bantam and other inferior factory as at  jambee and other place in which the factory videlicet their agent and Council  there have power to place other factor and chief and to inspect their account  place and displace they Bantam factory and Council place the defendant chief  factor at jambee who act in that service six year and then give his account to  the factory at jambee which be there allow and then be again reexamined by the  chief and Council at Bantam and send to the company here and here the company  draw many exception to the defendant account in write and send they to the  factory at Bantam to inspect and examine which they do and on full perusal and  examination thereof they allow the account and disallow the exception and make  a balance of money due to the defendant and charge the company here with bill  of exchange to pay it the defendant return into England the company pay part  of the bill of exchange and deliver to the defendant diverse good of the  defendant as pepper c but now sue for a account suggest the same error and  deceit former take and examine and disallow to which the defendant plead the  matter aforesaid and that rest quiet till he press for the residue of his  money due on the account and bill of exchange and far that diverse of his  voucher be forcible take from he by the king of jambee a heathen die his book  and many of his voucher deliver up to the factory at Bantam without which he  can not account but the company now offer that he shall have the use of his  book case in chancery the Lord chancellor disallow the plea and that the  defendant shall answer for he say that this differ from other case for it be a  national Cause and concernment and nothing shall discharge the factor in India  but a release or discharge from the company its self else their agent may by  mutual connivance ruin the company another point be the company impose a great  value on commodity prohibit by their agent to be trade in videlicet five six  or seven time the value yet the defendant rule to answer though it be a  penalty case in chancery de term sanct mich year king car in cancellar