case white versus nut Eq can Abr pl on casualty happen between the article for  a purchase and the seal of the conveyance who shall bear the loss one by  article recite that he have a estate for two life in a church lease covenant  to convey his title to the premise by such a day to I S as I S or his counsel  shall advice it happen that after the article and before the time appoint for  the conveyance one of the life drop and the question be upon who the loss  shall fall peer William it be decree per Lord keeper Reg lib b fol that in  regard here be no default in the seller in make the conveyance the loss of the  life ought to be bear by the purchaser in the same manner as if the  reversioner have article to peer William er p sell the reversion expectant  upon two life and one of they have die before the conveyance the purchaser  shall there have have the benefit of it and in each case in equity the estate  be as convey from the time of the article seal but his lordship seem to think  that if all the life have drop before the execution of the conveyance it may  have be another consideration for that the money be to be pay upon the  conveyance and no estate be leave there can be no conveyance as in equity the  estate belong to the purchaser from the time of his enter into the contract he  be entitle to all benefit ex part man post Vol two Mortimer v capper bro c c  Jackson v lever bro oh c and must bear all loss white v nut sup pain v Mellor  Ves revel v Hussey ba be Harford v purrier mad which may happen to the estate  between that time and the time of complete the purchase as to sale before the  master see ex part man ub sup why yet the reason of this distinction between  the loss of part and of the whole and vide the case of Cass v rudele all vern  vide also pope v root bro p c and Mortimer v capper bro c r in pope v root  Lord Apsley observe that the case of Cass v rudele as report by Vernon be  whole misrepresent that by the print case in the house of lord in ten it  appear that Cass do make a title in Jan by conveyance then execute that Tilly  die in and the earthquake do not happen till July and so far from rudele not  have sufficient effect of Tilly in his hand the decree state that rudele have  by his answer admit he have then in his hand pound residue of the  purchasemoney and the decree for payment be find on a good title have be make  to he of the premise peer William de term S HILLARII b r