case trussel case a person attaint of felony can be take in execution for debt  and shall he discharge from detainer upon mesne process say bide contrapost  ante Leon Bl Rep see king v PAey case in crown law p dougl he be remove out of  London by haheas corpus and it be return upon the Writ that he be detain there  for one execution and for diverse other action at the suit of diverse person  and it be move to the court that he shall be discharge of all the action and  of the execution for he be a person attaint of felony and have neither land or  good to satisfy they and his body be not his own but at the queen pleasure and  all the justice hold that as to the action he shall be discharge for a person  attaint shall not he put to answer nor shall he put in execution and so be all  the book but they say they have speak with the justice of the common plea and  baron of the exchequer who in both court have adjudge the contrary and upon  the very matter in law and not upon the form of plead but they will discharge  their conscience as they have for they find no book against their opinion  wherefore they all resolve he shall be discharge of the action but for the  execution they will advice for then peradventure the party shall lose it for  ever but Egerton solicitor who move it say when he be let at lihertv by the  act of the court this do not discharge he of the execution for ever and oh I  have been take in this court afterward pasch Elizabeth it be move again that  he be attaint of felony be let go at large but not pardon of the felony and be  at large be arrest at the suit of by a writ of execution upon a statute oi t  of chancery and afterward he remove himself by a haheas cor u into the queen  hench and remove the record of his attainder and bring a to know facias  against ogn ell comprehend all this matter croak Elizabeth Ognell appear and  protestand he be not the same person who be attaint for plea say that he be at  large and out of prison when he be arrest upon the writ of execution and upon  this it be demurrer and afterward Trinity Elizabeth they all resolve that he  shall he discharge of the execution upon the statute for be a person attaint  of felony the queen have interest in his body so he can be take in execution  for debt wherefore they do discharge he of it