case John DAFFORNE and thomas DAFFORNE versus goodman and bolt all refer to  web v web p wms Bartlett v green sim question lion v Mitchell mad Julii pre Ch  Freem S c one possess of a term for year on his marriage assign it to trustee  in trust for himself for life remainder to his wife for life remainder to the  heir of the body of the wife by the husband they have a son this be a good  limitation to the heir of the body of the wife and they be word of purchase  and not of limitation John bolt possess of a term for ninetynine year of  peachy farm in hallow in Worcestershire hold by a Lopus lease of the bishop of  Worcester Feb on his marriage with apoline his wife assign the term to trustee  in trust for himself for life remainder as to a moiety to apoline his intend  wife for life for her jointure remainder to the heir of the body of apoline by  he to be beget remainder as to the other moiety to the child of the body of  apoline John bolt die leave issue by apoline the defendant bolt apoline marry  a second husband by who she have issue a son Thomas and die John Dafforne her  husband take administration to apoline his wife who together with Thomas  Dafforne his son bring their bill against goodman Vernon chancery case the  trustee to compel he to assign over the term to they and account for the  profit for the plaintiff it be insist that the trust as to a moiety be that  the trustee shall permit John bolt to receive the profit for life remainder to  apoline for life and then in trust to permit the heir of the body of apoline  by John bolt to be beget to receive the profit during the residue of the term  that thereby apoline become tenant in tail and the whole term vest in her and  consequent belong to the plaintiff John Dafforne as her administrator but the  Lord chancellor hold that the case of peacock and Spooner ante can settle on a  appeal to the house of peer in Nov by which the decree of this court make in  be reverse must govern this case there the like limitation to the heir of the  heir of the wife by the husband to be beget adjudge to be take as word of  purchase and not as word of limitation and that on view of that precedent his  Lord ship have late decree accord in a like case and say it will be in vain to  make a decree to be reverse on a appeal and therefore dismiss the bill as to  that moiety peacock v Spooner ante and case there cite respective die pl  Cranmer be case as to the other moiety limit to the child of the body of  apoline it be insist that the plaintiff Thomas Dafforne as be a child of her  body though by a second husband be by the word of the trust entitle to a share  of that moiety and that it ought to be equal divide between he and the  defendant bolt the son of apoline by her first husband they two be the only  child of apoline Vernon chancery case but the Lord chancellor dismiss the bill  as to that demand also Reg lib a fol enter Dafforne v bolt for that it be the  estate of John bolt and Vernon chancery case er p the settlement to the  purpose before mention be make on his marriage the declaration of trust for  the benefit of the child of apoline must be intend the child of that marriage  and not as a provision for any child of her by any other husband vide Jenkins  v kemish hard Rep I lev Ch can SC cite arg Osgood v stride p wms when  settlement on marriage of the son of the settlor to settlor for life remainder  to the son and the heir of his body by that marriage remainder to the heir of  his body by any other wife with power to the settlor to charge the premise  with pound he borrow pound and secure it by mortgage by way of a lease and  release of the premise in fee the son die leave issue only a son by a second  wife and the question be whether the mortgage be a good execution of the power  as against he and on a special verdict in ejectment resolve it be not and by  Lord hale that the consideration of the marriage and the marriage portion will  run through all the estate raise by the settlement though the marriage be not  concern in they so as to make they good against purchaser and to avoid a  voluntary conveyance and see the above case of Jenkins v kemish state and  reason upon it Powell on power law of mort Vernon chancery case de term S  michaelis in curian porter