archer vers frowde a general admission of prochein any be sufficient error of  a judgement in c b in trespass and assault by one infant against another  verdict pro quer and assign for error that whereas the plaintiff have appear  to prosecute this suit by one Isaac knight her next friend as one special  assign by the court yet the say Isaac knight be never so assign nor do any  such admission appear upon record in nullo be erratum plead strange pro quer  in wandering argue that the defendant have come in gratis and plead in nullo  be erratum have thereby take away the necessity of the plaintiff procure the  return of a certiorari to verify the error for now the fact be admit and put  in judgement of the court whether upon that state of the case there be error  in point of law or not though there be a verdict in this case for the  plaintiff yet the matter assign for error be such as at commonlaw will have  vitiate the judgement in the case of a person of full age want of warrant of  attorney be always hold to be error till the h and then sure the want of a  admission of a prochein any be much more so because accord to roll Abr a and  many other book where it be say that the reason why a infant can authorize a  attorney to appear for he be because he be not suppose to be capable of choose  a proper person and therefore say the book he shall have a guardian appoint  against who he may have a easy remedy in case of misbehaviour but before he  can sue by prochein any there must be the appointment of the court and that  must likewise appear upon record whereas in this case it be admit there never  be any appointment to strange prosecute this suit the statute Westminster c  which appoint a infant to sue by prochein any run in omni grammatical case quo  those inferior in rank infra oetatem implacitare to be able concession be quod  near clothe admitta ad to follow pro the dawn which in Inst be take notice of  to be thus render by Fleta to follow One de propinquioribus anicis et  admittatur and this admission say coke must be by order of court as this be a  error at commonlaw it lie upon the other side to show whether it be within any  of the statute of Jeofails there be no such thing mention in any of they and  there be a case which be a tacit admission that it be not within they and that  be read v Waldron comb SC vide post a in b r hill W rot trespass by strange  report er p prochein any not guilty plead and a verdict for the plaintiff the  same error assign as here and upon a certiorari return that there be no  admission in nullo be erratum be plead but after this a certiorari be award ad  to shape knowledge Curice which need not have be if the verdict have help it  and then a admission be return and the judgement affirm but it will be object  that in this case the very fact of our assignment of error appear upon view of  the whole record to be false for that Isaac knight be return at the he d of  the record to have be admit to prosecute and defend all suit in c b on behalf  of the infant to this I answer that the admission return be not such a one as  we have assign the want of for error which be a admission to prosecute in this  particular cause and I have a affidavit that accord to the course of c b there  must be a separate admission in every cause to prosecute or defend in plea  prediction and such a admission it be that be want in this case so that to say  here be a general admission be beg the question because a general admission be  not sufficient indeed in this court it be take that a admission of a guardian  to appear in one cause will serve for other but that depend upon the  particular practice of this court that one in custody at the suit of a be bind  to answer all other suit against he of the same term without a distinct  process to bring he in but still in suit by a infant which must be by several  process there must be separate admission for the reason fail which support the  contrary practice in suit against a infant and agreeable to this be the entry  raze a concession be quod W b to follow pro I c who infra eatatem be versus h  e de plea one born of the earth strange and the admission return upon the  second certiorari in read v Waldron be particular to prosecute that suit at  commonlaw before the statute which enable man to make atorneys all party  appear secundum urgency short catalog in proper person unless where they  purchase the king writ of dedimus and that always recite the pendency of such  a particular cause and in the case of a infant register a b b there be writ to  the justice of c b signify that such a person be depute to sue for the infarit  and so require they to admit he and these recite a suit depend between a  plaintiff and b defendant de plea transgression or as the case be Wearg contra  in nullo be erratum confess no error which be improper allege but as to such  it serve for a demurrer and that we say be this case for the error assign be  contrary to the record which run et unde eaden Susanna who infra eatat a year  exist per Isaacum knight neighbor friend svan per curian domini king de banc  nunc hic specifically admissuin to step out to express grief c cro Elizabeth  hold that you can assign for error that there be no such attorney as the  defendant have appear by because it be contrary to the record which call he  his attorney as to the practice I be tell that when this general admission be  enter it be object to by my client and the officer of c b inform he it must be  so but if it shall be error at commonlaw yet it will be cure by Elizabeth  which help want of warrant of attorney and this be a case within the same  reason strange reply there be no general word in Elizabeth and to say it shall  extend to case of the like nature will be make that statute entire useless for  the h c have before help want of a warrant of the party against who the issue  be try but go no far and then the make the subsequent statute to extend to the  warrant of the other party show the judgement of the legislature that similar  case be not within the former provision and it be strong too because in the  Henry there be general word the recital in the declaration can never be set up  against the admission return at the head of the record which be concession be  that knight be admit tam ad to follow how ad to ward off all suit by and  against the infant in read v Waldron there be the same recital prout per roll  which be bring into court and inspect strange curian the practice of this  court warrant a general admission and there be no inconvenience in it it  amount to the same thing whether the admission be strange report er p general  or particular and no reason can be give why it shall not be one way as well as  the other the judgement of c b be affirm