case Elizabeth Fotherby widow executrix of Elizabeth broom who be the  executrix of Mr sergeant broom plaintiff William hartridge William PYSEING and  alice ux he bernard kendal and whether his wife defendant Lord chancellor may  legacy presume to be pay after a great length of time Lewis lees father of the  defendant Alice and whether in the year make his will and by it in it all give  to the defendant Alice and to Abraham lees one of his son pound apiece and  make his wife whether his executrix and short after die whether the executrix  afterward intermarry with the defendant hartridge and above thirty year since  she die and the defendant hartridge take administration of her good and de  good non c of Lewis lees the testator in the year because the defendant Alice  and her brother Abraham be then under age the defendant hartridge deposit  their legacy of pound apiece or security for the same in the hand of the  defendant whether who be then unmarried to the end she may pay they over  whereupon the defendant Kendal together with Mr sergeant broom enter into bind  to the defendant hartridge of pound penalty with condition to save he harmless  against the say legacy so deposit the defendant whether marry the defendant  Bernard Kendal and thereupon Bernard Kendal the better to secure the defendant  Vernon chancery case Alice give bind to her elder brother in trust for her  legacy afterward the defendant Alice and William Pyseing intermarry and then  Lewis lees their brother assign the defendant Kendal bind to the defendant  Pyseing who thereupon alter the security and take bind from Kendal in his own  name and obtain judgement upon the bind about the year Abraham lees die  intestate the defendant Alice Pyseing take administration of his good of which  all debt and charge pay there remain a great overplus one three part whereof  be order by the spiritual court to be pay to the defendant whether but it be  never pay the defendant Alice detain it still for satisfaction of the legacy  give and deposit as aforesaid so that by detain the defendant whether part of  her brother estate and by the bind and judgement which the defendant Kendal  give as aforesaid Pyseing and his wife be satisfy the two legacy that  nevertheless in Michaelmas term when Lewis lees the testator have be dead  about fortyfour year the now defendant Pyseing and his wife by combination  exhibit their bill against the Vernon chancery case defendant hartridge for  both the say legacy and the defendant hartridge have bring a action against  the plaintiff upon the say bind give by the say sergeant broom and the  defendant Kendal dumb sola to save he harmless all which be do by contrivance  after the plaintiff have pay in debt and legacy more than the testatrixs  estate amount to the Lord chancellor declare that in this length of time he  will presume the legacy pay and decree a perpetual injunction against the bind  and discharge the former decree against hartridge though enrol on this bill  and though no relief be particular pray against that decree this and the point  of enrolment not mention in the register book but the decree be there consider  to have be obtain by collusion and the bind decree to be deliver up to be  cancel Reg lib a fol vide Parker v ash ante Vol Vernon chancery case er p