coke a the countess OF Rutland case mich Elizabeth in the king bench a juror  be right name in the venire facias and in the distress but in the panel at  nisi prius and in the postea his surname be mistake if on examination it  appear that he be well name in the venire facias and also that he be the same  man who be return and swear the postea shall be amend in debt on a bind of  bring by the countess of Rutland the defendant plead to issue and it be find  for the plaintiff and now in arrest of judgement it be show that one Robert  more be return on the venire facias and so name in the distress but in the  panel before the justice of nisi prius by misprision he be name roll   b more  roll Rep roll Rep a Robert mawre and so on the postea upon which it be say  that a coke report b er p stranger who be not return be swear and give verdict  for which cause judgement shall not be give but it be resolve by the whole  court that if it can appear by examination that his coke b right name be  Robert more so that he be well name in the panel on the   b more roll Rep roll  Rep postea a roll Cr Elizabeth h cap Elizabeth c James cap Cr James Cr car  roll b venire facias and also that he be the same man who be return and be  swear there the postea shall be amend and to this purpose vide e by Danby  pound h title amendment Br h by which book it appear that if one be well  return in the panel of venire facias and misname in the distringa or habeas  corpora that it be not amendable but the process against the juror be  discontinue but at this day after verdict judgement I shall not be therefore  stay for all discontinuances be remedy by the stat of h and Elizabeth but at  this day if a juror be misname in the panel of venire facias although he be  well name in all the subsequent process it can be amend and so it be adjudge m  Elizabeth in the king bench in Codwells case and afterward the sheriff be  examine and on examination it appear that the true name of the juror be Robert  more and the say Robert more who be return appear and give his verdict and  thereupon for the reason aforesaid the record of the postea be amend by the  opinion of the whole court videlicet Popham chief justice Clench gawdy and  Fenner Vid n a Roland case ante p a a