case William SEAGOOD against hone and alice his wife Michaelmas term car roll  a surrender to the use of a and b and the long liver of they and for want of  issue of the body of b the remainder to c be good notwithstanding a clause  that it shall not be in force till after the death of the surrender roll ab  roll ab   Copy Jones Brownl Noy ld raym cro Elizabeth cro James sand march  ejectment for land in tuddington of a lease of Henry Seagood for three year  upon not guilty plead and special verdict the case be John reve copyholder in  fee of the manor of tuddington where the custom be find to be that any  copyholder may surrender out of court into the hand of two tenant copyholder  of the manor to the use of any other surrender into the hand of two such  tenant of the manor the say tenement to the use of Francis reve and John reve  son of the say Francis and of the long liver of they both and for want of  issue of the say John croak car reve the son of his body lawful beget the land  to remain to the young son of mary Seagood wife of William Seagood this  surrender not to stand and be in full force until after the death of John reve  John reve die and the surrender be present at the next court and Francis reve  and John reve son of the say Francis be admit tenant to they and the long  liver of they and to the heir of the body of the say John reve the son the  remainder to the young son of the say mary Seagood they also find that Francis  and after John reve die without issue and that Henry Seagood be the young son  of the say mary at the time of the surrender who be admit tenant and enter and  make a lease for three year to the plaintiff and that the say Alice wife to  the defendant be heir to the say John reve and enter and oust the plaintiff  and if c the first question be upon this clause this surrender not to stand  and be in full force until after the death of John reve whether the surrender  be good and that clause void?And it be resolve that the surrender be good and  that clause be repugnant to the premise shall be reject as void and idle and  shall not destroy the premise the second question be whether upon this  surrender John have a estate for life only or a estate to he and his heir of  his body?And it be resolve that John have but a estate for life and be a  estate for life limit by express limitation it shall not be a estate to he  high by implication and although peradventure it may be further enlarge by  implication in a devise yet it shall not be so in a surrender or conveyance in  pass of which the party ought or may have have sufficient counsel to direct he  wherefore for the two first point it be resolve for the plaintiff by the  opinion of all the four justice but for the manner of the find Jones doubt  whether it shall be a sufficient surrender to the use of the plaintiff because  the verdict find that it be customary land of the manor of tuddington and the  surrender ought to have be into the hand of two tenant of the manor but the  copy of the surrender find be in haec word tuddington in the margin at the  court baron of the honour of Hampton I S and I d tenant of the honour of  Hampton do present that John reve do surrender into the hand of the two tenant  of the honour c ut above and that be a court of the honour and into the hand  of the tenant of the honour be not good but all the other three justice hold  it be good enough for tuddington be in the margin it shall be say a distinct  court by itself for a honour consist of many manor yet all the court for the  manor be distinguish and have several copyholder and although there be for all  the manor but one court yet they croak car er p be quasi several and distinct  court and so it be usual in the time of the abbey that they keep but one court  for many manor whereupon it be adjudge for the plaintiff