case east against essington a declaration on a bill of exchange draw pay this  my first bill the second and three not be pay c and state that the drawee  endorsavit super billam that he who disregards billae that before to loosen to  the endorse be good after verdict although it do not state that the second and  three bill be not pay SC salk SC ld ray a action by the endorsee of a bill of  exchange against the drawer declare upon modern er p the custom of merchant  and that a to who the bill be make endorsavit super billam pillage content  billae pillage to he the plaintiff solvend and here it be agree by the court  that endorsement be a term know in law and signify a write on the back of a  paper or parchment contain another write to this declaration two exception be  take in arrest of judgement first that the word of the endorsement be not  significative enough to pass the property of the bill to the plaintiff accord  to the custom of merchant the second exception be that it appear there be  three bill for the same sum and that whereon the action be bring be the first  and say my second or three not pay pay this my first but per curian however  that matter will have be on demurrer it will be well after verdict for if the  second or three be pay there have be no promise at all for the promise be  conditional to pay this if the second or three be not pay therefore if the  second or three be pay the jury can not find for the plaintiffSee Slarke v  Cheeseman Carth and Weggerstoffe v keen stram where it be hold that this  allegation be unnecessary after judgement by default or on demurrer to the  replication see also Hotham v east India company term Rep Collins v Gibbs burr  a and as to the first exception they hold that that will be likewise good  after verdict for without find a endorsement they can not find for the  plaintiffSee Pinkney v hall ld ray a and it be not true to say that at this  rate and for this reason it may be say if there be no manner of endorsement  that defect will be cure by verdict for here there be a kind of a endorsement  set forth and the jury can not find for the plaintiff without find this to be  a good endorsement and such as amount modern to a agreement to have the money  pay to the plaintiff a bill of exchange may be accept by parole but not  transfer otherwise than by write upon the back of it and that transfer the  property by the custom of merchant and they put the case of debt for refit by  the grantee of reversion without show attornment and help by verdict and so in  case of bargain and sale plead without enrolment good after verdict holt chief  justice if a man write on the back of a bill of exchange this be to he pay to  I S or the content of this bill to be pay to I S and set his hand to it it  will be a good endorsement Qure pro I why not a declaration of trust but if  there be no endorsement at all set forth the verdict can help and judgement be  give for the plaintiff