case ex part wildman December the that S c yez pl the petitioner creditor of a  bankrupt who give he beside bill of exchange on merchant in holland that make  themselves liable by acceptance Lord chancellor the present petitioner be  creditor of a bankrupt who have give he bill of exchange on Vanvillen and  other in holland who make themselves liable by accept they and afterward fail  and compound with their creditor so that the petitioner have two personal  security consider it in the common case abstract from the cameo of bankrupt  atkins suppose several obligors the obligee may have several action against  they all several judgement too and several execution but he shall not levy  more than one satisfaction for his debt if he do court of law will step in the  same in bill of exchange action c lie against drawer and all the endorsers but  only one satisfaction for the debt so under commission of bankruptcy the  creditor be entitle to come under the commission against all the obligors  drawer c and this be not a preference give to such a creditor but a benefit he  be entitle to at law upon all his security till he be come pletely satisfy  there be two person at stake for this debt one of they a bankrupt a the other  have make a composition of S in the pound the petitioner have receive nothing  under the composition at the time be prove his debt under the commission of  bankruptcy and therefore admit a creditor for the whole but before a dividend  he receive S d in the pound under the composition of the acceptors of the bill  the commissioner in the commission of bankruptcy direct he shall be pay his  dividend after deduct what he have receiver on the bill of exchange atkins er  p the assignee say he shall be pay a dividend only on the sum leave after  deduct the S d but this will be take away from a man the double security he  have and which he may make use of in law and equity till he be satisfy his  whole debt as this composition be not pay he till after his debt prove he  shall receive a dividend on the whole debt and shall account hereafter for  what he have receive or shall receive on the bill of exchange and this will  not be any prejudice to the estate for if he receive more from those bill of  exchange than will answer twenty shilling in the pound he shall account to the  assignee for such surplus order therefore the petitioner to be let in to a  dividend on his whole debt pro rata with the other creditor Mr clark for the  assignee cite the case of Cooper versus Pepys to show that the court will not  admit a person who have receive atkins a dividend of six shilling against the  drawer to prove more than the remain fourteen shilling as a creditor under the  commission against the endorsee Lord chancellor say this differ from that case  because the creditor there have receive the benefit before he have attempt to  prove his debt against the endorsee under the commission