case marsh case ante pace case a writ of error libs by a ekecutor to reverse  the outlawry for felony of his testator ante I Leon Owen roll Abr godb Swinb  hawk salk   light b the case be argue by Altham that the writ of error lie by  the executor for the loss of the good which they shall otherwise have for it  may be head have no land nor any loss to any other than the executor and so it  be reason that they shall have the suit to reverse the outlawry and to be  restore to the good and for that vouch assize pound Henry pl Edward error  where two may have several writ of error or ttaint for several loss and Edward  pl Edward pl Edward pl pound where executor shall have a to know facias for  the damage recover and the heir for the land and he show two precedent mich  term Henry roll where one sue be indict for robbery and outlaw the executor  bring a writ of error and one error be assign that no proclamation be award  and a second error for that there be not five month hetween tile date of the  exigent and the return of it and there a to know facias be award against the  lord of the fee and it be return there be no tertenants and the outlawry be  reverse the other precedent be Trinity Henry roll where one be indict of  murder and outlaw and the administrator bring error and the error assign be  because the indictment be contra peace domini king whereas the offence be in  thetime of Richard the ThirdCoke argue contra for that the outlawry trench in  the realty and the land and good be forfeit and the blood be corrupt and  therefore the executor shall not have error because de least non curate law  and for that reason at the commonlaw tenant for year shall not falsify a  recovery which bind croak Elizabeth the land in the realty Henry Falsifle  recovery so at the commonlaw a traverse shall not be of a office which find a  wardship c for the king for they be but chattel until the statute of Edward  saint c pound Edward c and for the precedent cite he say the error be such as  be apparent fault whichwere reversible by motion and although the book of  Henry pl Richard pl be that a outlawry erroneous in this court be not rever  croak Elizabeth er p sible by plea but by writ of error yet he say the law be  otherwise dt the justice hold that a outlawry here can be reverse by plea but  ought to be by writ of error and the clerk say so be the course dlways but for  the matter they will advice notam coke f this case be eited to he resolve that  the writ of error be well bring by the executor and that it be reverse at his  suit v pasch plea fol