case CUDLIP against rundall where part of a thing demise in general word be  well except by particular word S c Mod S c show S c Carth S c comb S c salk S  c holt case the plaintiff declare that be possess of a house with the  appurtenance the twentyfifth of march car for a term of year then and yet  unexpired by indenture demise they to the defendant for seven year next ensue  who enter and be possess et fire suum in house predicta tam negligent guard  that on the eight of November the house be burn ad damnum sum of three hundred  pound the defendant plead non to send different ways modus et form issue be  join modern report er p and a special verdict that the plaintiff be possess  and the twentyfifth of march car demise by indenture to the defendant all that  one message c together with all house and outhouse to the same belong except  and always reserve out of the say demise to the plaintiff his executor or  administrator the house common call the new house new build upon the premise  for the use only of the father of the say plaintiff the say plaintiff their  wife and family to live in as they please but not to be let to any person or  person whatsoever and all other time when they shall not dwell there to be use  by the defendant his executor administrator and assign to hold the premise  except as before except to the defendant for seven year that at the time of  the lease there be two mansionhouses on the premise one old one and one new  build that the new build house be only burn that at the time of the fire the  defendant be in possession of the new build house except one room which the  plaintiff have and that the house be modern report burn by fire negligent keep  by the defendant in the part of the house in his possession et si c and it be  agree in this case that no action on the case lie against a tenant at will for  his neglect in the custody of his fire by which his house be burn   b so the  sole question here be if the defendant be other than a tenant at will of the  due house and if the house be demise to he for seven year et per curian  seriatim it be not for the lease be make of the message c except the new house  so that it be except by express word in the premise and also in the habendum  which be not contrary or repugnant to the premise for there be another house  demise which supply the word together with all other house and where the  exception do not defeat the grant or be contrary to it it must stand as dyer b  hob and if the exception be good then the question will be if it be not avoid  by these word reserve to the plaintiff his executor c for a exception out of a  exception put the matter at large et per holt chief justice if a man lease his  house except his new house during the term this exception be good but if he  except it during life it be void or if a man have a term of two house for  certain year grant his house except one of they for life this exception be  void for the word during life qualify the exception and show his intent that  the one house shall not be except during the whole term and so be void which  difference appear in dyer b but here the new house be except to the lessor c  which make a full exception and the word to the use of he only c do not  qualify but rather declare the intent of the exception judgement for the  defendant in this case the plaintiff do not aver that the lease be not expire  at the time of the fire