case the king against FAIRFAX justice may compel a man to take a apprentice  against his will SC comb SC Mod SC Carth SC holt SC Foley order of session  upon a man to take a apprentice move to be quash by Powell sergeant for they  can compel any man to take a apprentice against his will the effect of the  statute Elizabeth c S be to make a infant indenture of apprenticeship valid  notwithstanding his nonage and the statute say as the party shall agree which  govern the shower KB whole clause and show plain it be not their design to  make it compulsive then for the Elizabeth c S these word where they shall see  convenient will not bear such a construction as to make it compulsory whereas  before they can only bind they to tillage now they can bind they to other  trade for that they make a rate for it beside have they this power there will  be no occasion for a stock of money to do it with then by James c that enable  the master to take and keep they the general practice be object but I say that  arise upon this mistake of the judge resolution in Dalton justice a whereas  Twisden justice say they be never the resolution of the judge they be draw for  the purpose as reasonable but never agree unto it be also object that the Act  then will have no effect but this be a mistake for they may raise a stock then  pine case hill car b be express and in Cantual v Egginton c Twisden justice  declare it to be the opinion of all the judge then summer e contra that they  may compel the word be plain where they shall see convenient those resolution  be so agree and bring in by hide and none but Mr justice Jones do differ from  they and the settle practice have be all along accord the end of the statute  of James c be to excuse the master from the penalty of former law holt chief  justice the statute mean somewhat when it give a power to raise a stock that  the master shall have money with they I think otherwise it be needless so that  by my opinion they can compel dolben justice in the case of king v gillyflower  d before foster chief justice it be resolve that they be compellable and  foster declare that it be so resolve judgement be therefore give for the  plaintiff by Powell rokesby and Ventris justice against the opinion of  pollexfen Ch I SC lev with the argument of the chief justice S c vent and SC  Mod with the argument of all the judge but see Reynolds v grey easter term  will salk ld ray where holt Ch I be of opinion that the nomination of a umpire  determine the authority of the arbitrator although the umpire refuse unless he  be nominate upon a express condition but rokesby I doubt for that the  authority to elect a umpire imply a condition that he shall accept the office  see ld ray term Rep a Dalton justice page b show keb c Hilary term car side d  Hilary term car raym lev shower KB er p in the beginning of king James reign  in the twelve year of Charles the first Hutton and croak declare it for law at  Derby in pine case several of the judge do tell I that they be of a different  opinion and I think the practice be accord to the law Gregory justice the  inconvenience will be great the other way by mighty tax if a servant be  disorderly the house of correction will reach he eyres justice where a statute  give a power it give all that be necessary to that power the justice have  power to discharge the apprentice I take it they have distinct power they may  bind to husbandry by compulsion but not to other without money shower KB holt  chief justice then in husbandry only they can bind by compulsion dolbin  justice in the six year of Charles the first it be question whether a  apprentice may be impose on a clergyman and all the judge in England give  their opinion for it e but the order be quash because make by the session  original and not by appeal and holt chief justice say because it be not in  husbandry but by all the other judge Le part be compellable all prender un  apprentice you all meins en husbandry f