case Laurence against jacob Thursday April in a action on a promissory note  against the endorsor the plaintiff need not allege a demand on drawer S c  stram upon a writ of error in the court of king bench upon a judgement in the  common plea the case be the plaintiff who be the executor of a second endorsee  of a promissory note bring a action against the endorsor for default of  payment by the endorsor and after a demurrer to the declaration and judgement  for the plaintiff in the common plea a writ of error be bring in the court of  king bench the error assign be that the plaintiff in his declaration do not  set forth that the drawer have notice of the endorsement nor any demand or  default allege in the drawer say non allocatur it be the constant form and  matter of evidence the judgement be affirm the same point be determine in the  case of ship v hook easter term Geo on the authority of this case and on the  reason of the thing for the defendant by his demurrer admit that in  consideration of the premise videlicet the defendant make the endorsable note  and the endorse it to the plaintiff the defendant assume to pay the money  accord to the tenor of the note comy Rep note to former edition in the case of  Bromley v Farron also the same point be determine stram but in the case of  Collins v butler Hilary term Geo lee chief justice hold that a demand upon the  drawer be necessary before a endorsor can be charge stram and it appear that  the judge be for some time of different opinion on this subject burr but in  the case of heylin v Adamson mich term Geo it be determine that in action on  inland bill S of exchange by a endorsee against a endorse the plaintiff must  prove a demand of or due diligence to get the money from the drawee or  acceptor but need not prove any demand of the drawer and that in action on  promissory note by a endorsee against a endorsor the plaintiff must prove a  demand of a due diligence to get the money from the maker of the note burr Rep  and in a action against the drawer or endorsor of a bill it be necessary to  state a demand of payment from the acceptor of the bill or the maker of the  note and due notice of refusal give to the defendant Ruston v aspinal dougl a  modern report er p