christopher Ross and Elizabeth his wife plaintiff george Pudsey Esq and  Stephens and mary his wife and other defendant bill to establish a old  settlement the defendant plead that the tenant in tail in possession levy a  fine and suffer a common recovery to bar the entail and declare the use to  himself and his heir the plea be hold good the case ff George Pudsey the  grandfather of the say Elizabeth and mary have two wife by the first he have  issue Richard and Michael by the second venture he have issue George and  William Michael the second son by the first venture have issue two daughter  Elizabeth marry to the plaintiff Ross and mary marry to the defendant Stephens  and George the old son by the second venture have issue George the defendant  report tempt finch in march James article of agreement be make between the say  father and son by which the manor and rectory of Ellsfeild in Oxfordshire be  to be entail on Richard his old son and the heir male of his body remainder on  Michael and the heir male of his body remainder to the right heir of the  father with power to the say Michael to make lease for life to his young child  when he shall come into possession of the premise by virtue of the say entail  and then also to relinquish to George the old son by the second venture a farm  call W farm worth per and which he have for a long term of year and a annuity  of pound per and which he have in fee and pursuant to these article a  settlement be make accord and soon after George the father die and now Richard  his old son be in possession of the premise by virtue of the say entail levy a  fine and suffer a common recovery of the land limit to Michael in remainder  and declare the use thereof to himself and his heir and afterward by another  deed date year car he make another settlement by which he limit the premise to  Michael only for life remainder to George the old son of his father by the  second venture for life remainder to William and his heir and short after die  without issue the say George who be to have the benefit of W farm in case the  first settlement have stand and in case the estate therein limit to his  brother Michael have come into possession find himself aggrieve by this second  settlement exhibit a bill former in this court and obtain a decree to set it  aside in obedience to which decree Michael deliver up his lease which he have  for a long term of year in W farm have first make several lease to his young  child pursuant to the power he have by the first settlement the interest of  which lease be vest in and survive to the plaintiff Elizabeth and the  defendant mary which the say Elizabeth have enjoy accord but the party to that  decree die William the second son by the second venture do again set up the  second settlement make car and make entry and bring ejectment c against which  the plaintiff exhibit this bill to be relieve and that the article and first  settlement make James shall stand in force c the defendant George Pudsey plead  that if any such deed of settlement be make by George the elder year James yet  immediate after his death Richard his old son enter and become seize of a  estate in feetail of and in the premise and be mind to bar the remainder and  to have a absolute estate in fee in himself he do in easterterm car levy a  fine report tempt finch and suffer a common recovery in order to bar the  entail and by a deed date April declare the use report tempt finch er p  thereof to himself in fee and thereby the say Richard become seize of a  absolute estate in feesimple of the premise and afterward by deed date car in  consideration of settle the same in his own name and family and blood he do  convey it to the use of himself for life and afterward to his brother Michael  for thirtyone year if he shall so long live and afterward to George his half  brother by the second venture for eighty year if he shall so long live  remainder to the first and all other son of the say George successive in tail  male remainder to William Pudsey and his heir by virtue of which settlement  the say Richard and Michael enjoy the same successive during their life and  after their deceases the defendant George who be the issue male and old son of  the say George Pudsey his father who die in the lifetime of the say Michael be  vest and settle in the premise to he and his heir male by virtue of the say  deed car and other assurance as aforesaid and thereby he hold and enjoy the  same and justify the keep all deed concern the premise for defence of his say  Title and for demurrer he say that it appear by the plaintiff bill that the  lease under which they claim be make long after the settlement car by which  settlement Michael be only tenant for thirtyone year if he live so long and he  be dead the say lease set up by the plaintiff which of their own show be  voluntary be now determine and by their own show it likewise appear that the  article in the bill mention be perform by the subsequent deed make in  pursuance thereof year James and that the entail be bar by Richard who execute  the deed car and the bill be to set aside that deed and to abridge the tenant  in feesimple from dispose his inheritance for these and other reason the  defendant demurrer and demand the judgement of this court the Lord chancellor  allow the plea with liberty to the plaintiff to reply