case crying Euhan against Hoskins and the city OF gloucester if a lease for  year worth l ayear belong to two coparceners and one of they upon a false  suggestion that a fine of l be to be pay for the renewal of it obtain a  assignment of the other moiety for a consideration of l equity will set aside  this conveyance as fraudulent and order the assignee to account for a moiety  of the profit S c Eq Abr lady Joan cook by licence from king Henry the eight  grant the land in question to the mayor and burgess of Gloucester in trust  that whenever the lease make by her to one partridge and whether his wife  shall be determine they will make a new lease to they or to the heir of the  say whether at any time on request on payment of twenty mark and under the  yearly rend of twenty mark for the space of thirtyone year and with such  clause and condition as in the old lease and that upon the expiration of such  lease of thirtyone year the defendant the mayor and burgess of Gloucester  shall at any time on the request of the heir of the say whether make a new  lease to they in manner as aforesaid the plaintiff Evans and one Holeman  Hoskins who be the father of the defendant Hoskins be coheir of the say  whether partridge and be the say Holeman Hoskins in the year get a assignment  from the say Evans of his right without any manner of consideration therefore  this bill be bring against the defendant Hoskins the son of the say Holeman  Hoskins to set aside the say assignment as obtain by fraud and imposition on  the plaintiff Evans by misinform modern report he of the state of his right  and against the other defendant the mayor and burgess of Gloucester to have a  lease make to the plaintiff Evans and to the defendant Hoskins as coheir to  the say whether partridge and accord to the covenant in the original lease  grant by the lady cook to the mayor and burgess of Gloucester the defendant by  their answer acknowledge that the plaintiff and the defendant Hoskins be  coheir to the say whether partridge and that the lady cook make such modern  report er p a grant to the mayor and burgess of Gloucester as in the bill be  set forth and that lease have since be make of those land pursuant to the  covenant in the original lease but that in the year the plaintiff Evans in  consideration of eighty pound pay to he by Holeman Hoskins the defendant  Hoskinss father assign all big right in the lease to he the say Holeman  Hoskins and by another deed covenant that the say Holeman Hoskins may make use  of big the plaintiff name in take a new lease of the city c and that his name  may be put in the say new lease in trust for the defendant Hoskins and that on  produce the say deed the city make a new lease to the say Holeman Hoskins  without name the plaintiff but deny any fraud in obtain the say lease the  mayor and burgess of Gloucester likewise own the pedigree the grant and the  trust as set forth in the bill and that on show they a assignment make by the  plaintiff Evans of all big right they make a new lease to the say Holeman  Hoskins accord to the covenant in the original lease this be the case those  who argue for the plaintiff insist that lease have be make from time to time  accord to the covenant and clause in the original lease and that the last  lease grant to Holeman Hoskins be in the year and that the say Holeman in the  year make application to the plaintiff Evans who be a stranger to this  covenant and inform he that the city insist on two hundred and fifty pound  fine and on a considerable advancement of the rend whereupon the plaintiff  Evans be thus misinform and not know but the lease in be will soon expire  execute this assignment in consideration of twenty pound to he pay by the say  Holeman Hoskins and no more it be true the defendant Hoskins who be executor  of the say Holeman Hoskins pretend that this assignment be make in  consideration of eighty pound pay to the plaintiff Evans which modern report  he deny but admit it be so it be a very small consideration for the purchase  of such a lease the land be worth above two hundred pound ayear beside at the  time of this assignment there be twelve year of the old lease unexpired so  that a fraud appear upon the very face of the deed itself a Cory v Cory vezey  oldin v Sambourne atk young v Peachey atk Kinchant v Kinchant brown c c Evans  v Llwllyn brown c c a therefore it be insist that the say assignment shall be  set aside and a new lease decree to the plaintiff Evans and that the defendant  as executor to Holeman Hoskins may account to the plaintiff for the profit of  the lease receive by big father Holeman Hoskins in his lifetime and by he the  defendant since his father death on read the proof it appear that there be no  more than twenty pound pay to the plaintiff as a consideration of his assign  his right in the lease to the say Holeman Hoskins and that the benefit thereof  be worth more to he than two hundred pound ayear and that twelve year of the  old lease be unexpired at the time when he the plaintiff execute this  assignment and it appear by a letter which be prove to be write by the say  Holeman Hoskins purport that he and the plaintiff be to pay two hundred and  fifty pound to the city for a fine on renew the lease when they be to pay only  twenty mark and no more and all that the defendant prove be that the land be  not of so great a value at the time of the assignment as they be now and that  the city insist on one hundred and fifty pound for a fine which be very true  but the reason be because Holeman Hoskins will have a lease make to he  exclusive of the plaintiff Evans whereupon the court decree that this  assignment shall be set aside and a new lease to be make to the plaintiff and  to the heir of Holeman Hoskins accord to the covenant in the original  indenture make between the lady Joan cook and the city of Gloucester and that  the defendant the executor of Holeman Hoskins shall account for a moiety of  the profit during the say Holemans life and since big death and shall pay the  cost of this suit modern report er p