case Shutford against PENOW Trinity term car roll where a promise be make to  do a thing upon request the cause of action do not arise until the request be  make and refuse ante godb Jones Hutton lev salk skin strange assumpsit whereas  the defendant have a dog which use to kill sheep and know thereof and that his  dog have kill the plaintiff sheep and have notice that the plaintiff intend to  sue he for recompense he thereupon entreat the plaintiff not to sue he and to  make what benefit be can of the sheep so kill and in consideration that the  plaintiff will desist his suit and make such benefit as be may of the say  sheep the defendant the first day of may James promise the plaintiff to  recompense he the damage which he sustain by the kill of the say sheep and  allege in fact that be thereupon desist from his intend suit and that he  endeavour to make what benefit he can of the sheep so kill but can not make  any and that he be damnified by the kill of they fourandforty shilling and  that upon the first day of may car he request the defendant to recompense he  for his damage sustain and the defendant refuse whereupon be bring this action  the defendant plead the James c and that this action lie not by the a   croak  car er p say statute be ground upon a promise make above six year since  whereupon the plaintiff demurrer and after argument at the bar by roll for the  plaintiff and by for the defendant it be adjudge that the action be well bring  within the time limit for although the promise be make James yet there be not  any cause of breach thereof nor ground of action against the defendant until  request to make recompense for until such request be do not know what to pay  nor be there any due for the duty arise upon the request and the nonpayment  after the request be the cause of the action as assumpsit to pay such a sum if  be marry a S or upon such person return from Rome upon request there be not  any thing due nor be there cause of action until the marriage or return from  Rome and the request make and although the promise be make ten year before yet  the cause of action be the nonpayment upon request after marriage or return  from Rome and not before and if the action be bring within the time of the  statute after the breach it be well enough whereupon it be adjudge for the  plaintiff