Brampton and crab after the inquest be take by default the defendant can make  no suggestion on the roll after a verdict for the plaintiff in a indebitatus  assumpsit and shilling damage assess the defendant come into court and suggest  upon the roll quod to express grief no one misas et custagia versus Self in  hoc grammatical case super veredictum mock to retake debet send abjectly petit  idem defendens quod misae et custagia svan per Self daughter of the Sun a  defending svan in here part expenditure per judgment what curiae juxta form to  cause to stand Himself adjudice because to say quod set out the Act of James c  make for the recovery of small debt in the city of London and which subject  the plaintiff to lose his cost and pay cost where the party be citizen and the  damage under shilling then the defendant aver that at the time of make the  promise in the declaration et always from that source thus far he be and be a  freeman of the city of London reside within the city videlicet in such a  parish strange and ware use the trade of a cooper and that the plaintiff be  and be a freeman reside within the city videlicet c use the trade of a barber  and that the cause of action arise within the jurisdiction of the court of  conscience which be hold every Wednesday and Saturday every week since the  time of the promise he likewise aver that he be indebt to the plaintiff in no  more than shilling and that he have expend so much in his defence which the  plaintiff ought to pay juxta form to cause to stand pillage the first doubt  upon this suggestion be whether the defendant shall not have make it before  the cause have so far proceed as to a verdict and whether it be not a matter  pleadable to the jurisdiction of the court but upon cite a case of pennel v  Wallis in b r mich W where after verdict for shilling the defendant make such  a suggestion which be argue on demurrer and hold to be well suggest after a  verdict this first difficulty be get over but then it be object that it appear  the inquest be take by default and therefore the defendant be out of court as  to all purpose but have judgement against he after a default there can be no  repleader salk Mod can salk roll Abr pl for this last reason the court hold  that the defendant can not be receive to make the suggestion and so the  plaintiff have judgement vide instance where this shall be suggest on the roll  where the judge shall certify and where it must be plead Devenish v Mertins  post Hickman v colley post and the note see also king v Poland post strange  report er p strange easter term george king in b r Thomas Lord Parker chief  justice sir Littleton powys Knt sir Robert Eyre Knt sir John Pratt Knt justice  sir Edward Northey Knt attorneygeneral sir William Thompson Knt recorder of  London solicitor general