case the queen against BLAUCHER ten be to he pay at the parsonage and a per on  authorize by the bishop must demand they otherwise the certificate be  traversable post more Inst Savil Bl Com the question be if upon a traverse to  the certificate of the bishop of Lincoln for nonpayment of ten upon demand nor  within forty day after whether the henefice he void by the Hen c that enact  that after such default and certificate thereof make to the court under the  seal of the bishop that it shall he void manwood chief baron say it have be a  great question if this certificate of the bishop he peremptory or that the  party shall he admit to his traverse of it and upon great deliheration hetween  the baron and by the advice of the other justice it have be clear hold that  the certificate be not peremptory for the bishop do it only as a officer  scilicet as collector of the ten and not as a judge as in the case of bastardy  and here be to be a default in the parson videlicet non payment which be  triable perpais for otherwise all the parson of England may he put out of  their a term Rep croak Elizabeth er p parsonage by such nude surmise and bare  certificate without any answer and the law never intend to make the  certificate so peremptory baron gentleman say he have know it so rule in his  experience upon a issue upon avoidance or non avoidance upon that statute in a  quare hinder and all the baron hold in the principal case that the officer of  the bishop who be to demand the ten ought also to he authorize to receive they  for he can appoint they to he pay to another place or to another person for  the parson be to pay they at his own house and to the person that demand they  in the name of the bishop and they say it have be so former rule a croak  Elizabeth hilary term Elizabeth in the queen bench sir Christopher Wray Knt  chief justice sir Francis gawdy Knt John Clench Esq Rohert schute Esq justice  sir John Popham Knt attorneygeneral sir Thomas Egerton Knt solicitor general