brown against expense in DECTMENT incumbent in evidence to a jury it be hold  per curian that read the article in the church porch be sufficient the divine  service be there by reason of denial of the key of the church by the defendant  lessee at will of disseizee by attorning as Locker against Polvert to seize do  determine the will and his continuance in possession after do make he  trespasser by Windham send curian contra but all agree that a special action  upon the case will lie against he for keep possession per quod the plaintiff  lose the profit c and if such person be any way concern in the controversy it  be a disablement to be a witness so much as to prove induction and read the  article quaere if read the article at a reputative hamlet church that be  belong to the principal be sufficient within the statute the principal church  be shut against he the plaintiff produce a institution of the bishop which  recite only that there be a judgement and a writ to he which per curian be not  sufficient without produce a copy of the judgement or award of execution no  more then the case of pinner against wright on diem to shut extremum the writ  be lose although there be a enquisition and such like paper it be hold  insufficient on demurrer as Twisden cite yet if become facias which the  sheriff be no more bind to return than this writ to the bishop be lose the  court will and frequent do admit the warrant of the sheriff as evidence to  prove such writ it be hold per curian that admission and institution by the  bishop on writ without any judgement be all a nullity and make no plenarty the  king can usurp without special mention of his intention to be so in his  presentation not when the presentation recite it be by title when possession  have go by mean conveyance although ancient it be lodge in the crown it need  not be show how it come out per curian contra Maynard who hold that plead be  the rule of evidence the party ought to show some record how it come out of  the king also Maynard hold that when the king recite any special title he can  usurp but when the patent be seu elsewhere wherever modus ei spectant he may  usurp send curian contra by Elizabeth a allowance by the bisbop of any diocese  be sufficient although his allowance be only to preach within his diocese the  statute not require any licence by the bishop of the diocese where the church  be if the bishop collate on a presentation of the king by a mistake title it  be void only the dawn quorum interest Rud against evesque Carleol in hut in  ejectment prior possession be a good title against the king presentation but  in quare hinder the incumbent ought although defendant to make a title against  the king presentation without title as h but if the incumbent be in by entry  of his own head without any presentation it be not sufficient in either