case waller against king the court of chancery will not vacate a award on the  ground of its be unreasonable and that the party after notice to attend be not  hear S Eq Abr this be a bill bring against the defendant to set aside a award  and also a judgement and execution get on a bind and a warrant of attorney  extort from the modern report er p plaintiff Waller by duress and to have  restitution of the money levy by sale of good take in execution the case be  thus the plaintiff Waller be arrest at the suit of the defendant and thereupon  both party submit all difference between they to two arbitrator and that if  they can not agree in a award then to a umpire and the arbitrator not agree  the umpire award thirtysix pound to be pay by the plaintiff to the defendant  without hear the plaintiff thereupon a action of debt be bring against he for  nonperformance of the award and be under a arrest a bind be extort from he and  a warrant of attorney thereon to confess judgement which be enter and modern  report execution take out and good be levy to the value of forty pound all  which the plaintiff pray may be set aside the defendant in his answer set  forth that be hold land by lease under the plaintiff and that be indebt to  several person the plaintiff his lessor persuade he the defendant to make over  his good and to deliver up his lease to he the plaintiff on purpose to protect  the same against his creditor which be do accord but that the plaintiff abuse  the trust and insist that the good be his own by a absolute surrender make  thereof by the defendant and this be the great cause of difference between  they it be refer to arbitration and all this matter appear to the arbitrator  in the presence of the umpire he make the award c the counsel for the  plaintiff argue that the award ought to be set aside because it be make  without the privity of the plaintiff and therefore he can make no defence  against it and that it be a very unreasonable award a that a award must be  reasonable see roll Abr arbitrament b linsey v Ashton Bulst Anonymous keb  Tavener v Shingley cro car alley v Cox keb Godfrey v Godfrey Mod a because it  appear upon the proof that the plaintiff have good of the defendant to the  value only of seven pound ten shilling and no more and yet he be award to pay  thirtysix pound which be a very hard award the court will not set aside the  award upon account of any hardship therein because the arbitrator be judge of  the party own choose b see Jones case roll Rep brown v brown Ch case S c vern  b and the plaintiff have notice and may have be hear if he please therefore it  be decree that the bill shall stand dismiss with cost