arnold versus jefferson mich will assize where it be good where not salk in  this case it be hold per holt Ch just that a assize or quod to let pass c  quare to raise up qudam edificia be good for there may be a building without a  proper name it lie de workshop which be a word more uncertain than edificia  yet it will not lie de mole because the thing itself be not to be recover as  in a prcipe Salkeld er p stop of light be a nuisance but stop a prospect be  not as for instance one who have a house and light time out of mind the  neighbour and owner of the next field build a shed which stop the light and  then make a lease thereof to W r against who the plaintiff Salkeld bring a  action for this nuisance et per curian admit he may have a assize of nuisance  against the builder yet he can have a action against his lessee because it  will he waste in he to pull down the shed and abate the nuisance but the  plaintiff may stand on his own ground and abate it et per curian where the  thing do be a nuisance per intervalla as a cock or pi pe or gutter a action  lie against the lessee because every fresh run be a fresh nuisance yet if W r  have a way over the ground of W m and he stop that way and then demise the  ground to c a action lie against the lessee for continue this nuisance a lord  of a manor may build a dovecote upon his land parcel of his manor and this he  may do by virtue of his right as lord thereof but a tenant of the manor can do  it without licence for he can have no right to any privilege that may be  prejudicial to other but this be not a common nuisance nor punishable in the  leet but the nuisance be particular the lord shall have a action on the case  or a assize of nuisance as he may for building a house to the nuisance of his  mill n b cro oath cro Elizabeth difference where the oath be to do a spiritual  and temporal thing assumpsit c in case he will make oath before such a person  her promise c et per curian oath be either by compulsion or voluntary and a  voluntary oath by the consent and agreement of the party be lawful and in such  case if it be to do a spiritual thing and the party fail he be suable in the  ecclesiastical court pro imsionefidei and if it be to do a temporal thing he  may former be punish in the starchamber if he fail and now in B R