case knight against Symms a ejectment for five close call furlong contain  twenty acre of arable and pasture be bad for it be uncertain how many acre of  arable and how many of pasture S c show SC salk SC holt SC comb S c Carth  ejectment for five close call furlong contain twenty acre of arable and  pasture to have and to bold the aforesaid close of land c upon not guilty  plead the plaintiff have a verdict it be move in arrest of judgement for that  he ought to demand so many acre certain of arable and so many of pasture and  upon this very exception a judgement in ejectment be reverse upon a writ of  error bring in this court Martin v Nichols cro car a the plaintiff declare of  a message and forty acre of land meadow and pasture thereunto belong and do  not distinguish how much of each Savells case   a be express that a ejectment  will not lie of a close but it must be of a certain number of acre and the  nature of the land must be particular express it have be hold that though a  ejectment will not lie de to make one enclosed space general because the  sheriff can tell of what to deliver possession yet where a name be give to the  close without set out the number of acre it be well enough and this be the  case of Jones v Howell in cro Elizabeth but in the same book and but two year  afterward it be rule jordan v Cleabourne cro Elizabeth b that it will not lie  of a three part of a close though a name be give to it and the reason there  give be because ail ejectment be in nature of a praecipe which must contain a  certain number of acre but that which come near to the case now in question be  the case of week v sparrow cro James c which be a ejectment of two close call  Gulwel contain three acre of land and do not show what each close contain  which be hold good because the quality of the land be mention but Houghton  justice be of another opinion in that case which seem to very reasonable for  if ail ejectment will not lie de to make one enclosed space because of  incertainty the addition of these word which follow videlicet contain three  acre of land do not make it more certain a ejectment de castle villan et  terris in Kilborough seem to be certain enough to describe the thing demand in  order to recover the possession but it be hold to be too general Yelv style d  and modern upon which no to have facias can be award and therefore  insufficient Tremaine sergeant contra if there be such a certainty of which  the sheriff may deliver possession it be well enough ld ray e in Savells case    f there be neither the quantity or quality of the land describe but here be  both that be ail ejectment of a message and a close call dovecote close  contain three acre but do not say whether land meadow or pasture c this action  be in nature of a trespass and therefore it will lie de to make one orchard  Bunbury v yeoman side g or de to make one house cro James palm Leon stram h  but it be not doubt but it will lie de to make one messuagio sive tenement  with this addition videlicet v cat the black swan Dict per Twisden justice  side but see Welsh v ford will that a ejectment for a message or tenement be  bad style for the word tenement be of a more extensive signification than the  word message it be uncertain what be thereby demand cro Elizabeth cro James  and therefore a ejectment for a tenement only have be hold bad stram but the  court have endeavour to get over this objection will and accord a ejectment  for a message and tenement and for a message or tenement have be hold  sufficient certain after verdict Stewart v Denton term Rep I modern er p  curian all the certainty in this case be the addition of the name call the  long furlong without those word the other be very uncertain now name of place  be neither necessary or material in give possession because they often change  with the proprietor and the sheriff must have sufficient notice out of the  record itself to give possession it be a doubt whether a ejectment will lie of  a close give it a name without add the number or quality of acre for if a  assize shall be bring de to make one enclosed space peremptory or urgent call  black acre it be not good but here it be very uncertain for the plaintiff do  not show how many acre of each in pasture and meadow and then to say habendum  enclosed space terrae be yet more uncertain for though the word land in legal  acceptation comprehend arable land yet it do not relate to pasture so nothing  be say of that and for those uncertainty the judgement be reverse after two  motion in Trinity term follow