case crying Euhan vers viscountess dowager fauconberg in chess if a defendant  plead nil to have in property to a action of debt for rend bring upon a  indenture of lease for seven year it be a good cause of demurrer cro Elizabeth    Litt b ld raym Str S c this be a action of debt for rend and the plaintiff  declare that by if the demise be by deed poll or by parole the defendant may  plead nil to have in property   light b lib Plac vent Lord holt determine in  the case of Chettle v pound report in ld raym p which be a action of debt for  rend on a demise in write that the defendant may give nil to have in property  in evidence upon nil debet plead because the plaintiff have never be in  possession a indenture of the that of September he demise to the defendant a  message in Bondstreet for seven year at per and by virtue of which demise the  defendant enter and be from thence in possession to the day of the Feast of  the annunciation of the bless virgin in and for a year rend due at the say  feast this action be bring c the defendant plead that before the demise  videlicet on the that of January the plaintiff be possess of the same message  for the term of year to come and the same day assign his term to whether  Colwell who afterward videlicet on the that of July enter and be and be still  in possession and this she be ready to prove to which the plaintiff demurrer  and show for cause that the plea do not confess and avoid nor deny the matter  in the declaration that it do not show expulsion of the defendant and that it  be argumentative c the defendant join in demurrer and it be argue by sergeant  Whitaker that the plea be a special nil to have in property and therefore the  plaintiff ought to have reply and rely upon the estoppel and not demurrer    Ent hob and perhaps the plaintiff have a interest and therefore the defendant  may confess and avoid   light b cro Elizabeth say non allocatur for upon a  plea of general nil to have in property comens the plaintiff may demurrer  where the estoppel appear in his declaration lev salk raym S c a a strong in a  special nil to have c and the defendant here do not show that the plaintiff  have a interest which can be avoid and also the defendant do not answer to the  possession as she ought vent and therefore judgement be give for the plaintiff  comens er p