case wilcocks versus wilcocks see Blandy v Widmore vern and note thereto Eq  can ab pl S c a covenant on his marriage to purchase land of pound a year and  settle they for the jointure of his wife and to the first c son of the  marriage he purchase land of that value but make no settlement and on his  death the land descend on the old son on a bill by the son for a specific  performance decree the land descend to be a satisfaction of the covenant a  child entitle to a orphanage share of his father personal estate die under  twentyone and unmarried can devise it by his will for by the custom it survive  to the other child but he may devise his share under the statute of  distribution the plaintiff father upon his marriage covenant to purchase land  of pound per and and to settle the same upon himself for life and on his wife  for her jointure and to the first and other son in tail remainder to the  daughter the father who be a freeman of the city of London die intestate have  purchase land of the value of pound per and but make no settlement thereof but  permit they to descend upon the plaintiff his old son who now bring a bill  find on his father Vernon chancery case er p marriagearticle to have pound per  and purchase out of the personal estate and settle to the use in the  marriagearticle Lord keeper the land descend be of pound per and and upward  ought to be deem a satisfaction of the covenant Vernons chancery case and  decree it accord vide on this head Herne v Herne ante p and case cite in note  p there and that the personal estate shall be divide and distribute among the  three child accord to the custom of the city of London and the statute for  settle intestates estate one of the daughter have attain the age of seventeen  year make her will and devise her personal estate per cur the will be good as  to the share that belong to her by the statute but as to her orphanage share  both her original share and her share of her brother John orphanage share he  have die under age Reg lib b fol enter wilcocks v de Lanoy and wilcocks v main  she die unmarried before twentyone it survive to the other orphan by the  custom and her will can not take place upon her orphanage part vide on this  point the case cite in note to Fouke v lewen ante vol p by which case it also  appear that if she have be marry her part will have go to the husband and will  not have survive to the other child but note that if a man marry a city orphan  and her portion be in the Chamber of London and he die before the wife attain  her age of this shall not be look upon as a depositum for the husband but as a  choose en action which he not have take it out and reduce into possession must  survive to the wife and pheasant case vent Ch can S c