case mary Ridout widow and executrix of William Ridout plaintiff dowding and  other Reg lib b fol defendant November the that a by his will first give a  estate for life to his wife and in the latter part create a trust term for  payment of debt to take place from the day of his death William Ridout who die  seize in fee of the reversion of several estate in somersetshire convey they  to two person and their heir to the use of himself for life and afterward to  the use of such person and for such purpose as he by will shall appoint and do  accord devise the say premise to Robert and Richard tyte and their heir in  trust for the plaintiff for life and afterward for a term of year in trust by  and with the consent and direction of the plaintiff testify in write under her  hand and seal in the presence of three witness for raise such sum as shall be  think necessary for discharge his debt with remainder over and appoint the  plaintiff executrix and residuary legatee and die soon after without issue the  defendant set up several demand upon the estate of William Ridout and  particular the defendant dowding who claim by bind and otherwise Lord  chancellor a testator in the first part of a will give his wife a estate for  life in particular land and in the latter part create a term for year to take  place from the day of his death in trust for raise sum of money to discharge  his debt in such manner as the wife shall direct the question be whether the  wife be entitle to have her estate for life discharge of the term  notwithstanding the testator have in the outset of his will give her a estate  for life yet I be of opinion the term though subsequent shall take place of  the wife estate for life and it be plain it be his intention it shall be so by  make use of these word the term to take place from the day of his death these  word do not appear in the register book nor do the decree take any notice of  the point here make but direct the sale of the year term general as mention in  the decree here state and it be immaterial how a testator place the several  devise in a will because the whole must be construe together so as to make  atkins it consistent see uvedale v halfpenny p W Worseley v Glanville Ves  brown v Jones ante and here it be not subject to a bare and naked term only  which may have admit of some doubt but to the trust of a term to raise money  for discharge the testator debt and the word that follow in such manner as his  wife shall direct do not intend the wife shall have a power of exempt her  estate for life but only that she may raise it in the most convenient method  either by mortgage or otherwise his lordship decree if the personal estate of  William Ridout be not sufficient to pay his debt that the trustee shall sell  the term of year to make good such deficiency atkins er p