case russell against corn a action of false imprisonment of the wife bring by  husband and wife declare per quod the husband domestic concern remain undo ad  damnum of both be good and the per quod only for aggravation S c salk S c holt  S c ld ray false imprisonment by husband and wife for the imprisonment of wife  per quod to carry on business household member of the husband per interval to  stay behind infectan ad grave damnum of both it be move in arrest of judgement  that the business of the husband remain undo can not be to the damage of the  wife and that the action for that ought to be by the husband alone as if the  husband conclude per quod source of comfort et consortium to send away be must  conclude ad damnum of he alone but it be answer that here the action be well  bring and conceive for the imprisonment what come under the per quod will only  be take for aggravation as if word in themselves actionable be speak of a wife  and the husband and wife bring the action and conclude per quod the husband  lose his customer it will be well see colman and his wife v Harcourt lev and  grove and his wife v heart bull n p a for the word be in themselves actionable  the per quod shall be take for aggravation queen in all respects cur to go  away and by holt chief justice matter may be lie by way of aggravation in  trespass for break his house and beat his servant without say per quod slavery  to send away see chamberlain v Greenfield will b No action lie for the master  for battery of his servant without a per quod yet it may be well put in as a  aggravation but if you make two several count of it one of they videlicet for  beat servant will be bad suppose a man get another maid or daughter with child  no trespass lie for it but if he that have do it come into the house without  the owner leave he may put the get his daughter with child in for aggravation  or he may omit it and give it in evidence within the alian irregular judgement  be give for the plaintiff nisi causan the first day of next termSee Newman v  smith in the king bench in easter term whether salk S c holt note to former  edition see also milner v Milnes term Rep c easter term the three of queen  whether in the queen bench sir John holt Knt chief justice sir John Powell Knt  sir Littleton powys Knt sir Henry gold Knt justice Edward Northey Esq  attorneygeneral sir John hawles Knt solicitor general