case Richard all versus owner bergavenny refer to Evans v Evans Ch Nov pale  yellow S c a house together with the furniture thereof be limit to a feme and  such heir of her body as shall be live at her death and in default of such  remainder over the feme have a estatetail in the house and the absolute  property in the furniture devise to a for life remainder to the heir of his  body though in the singular number be a etatetail   b the word heir of the  body can in the same clause be construe word of limitation as to land and as  to good word of designation of the person a estate together with the furniture  of the house be limit to the lady bergavenny and such heir of her body as  shall b live at her death and in default of such the remainder over the  question be whether the good go over to the remainderman or whether the  absolute property thereof vest in the lady bergavenny Vernon chancery case per  cur the limitation of the estate to the lady bergavenny and such heir of her  body as shall be live at her death with a remainder over for want of such be a  estatetail a devise to a man for life remainder to the heir of his body though  in the singular number or to the issue of his body be a estatetail and this  now clear consider as law king v mell vent Le v SC for the word issue be nomen  proceeding by inference dubber v Trollope Amb where see this point much  discuss by Lord chief justice Eyre do v lame burr et vide white v Collins Com  Rep Robinson on gavelkind so in the devise of a fee the word heir though in  the singular number will do be nomen proceeding by inference there can be but  one heir at a time and it shall go from heir to heir roll ab clark v day cro  Elizabeth sheep touch p qy whether such limitation in a deed will give a fee  that it will seem to be the inclination of Eyre Ch just opinion in his  judgement in dubber v Trollope Amb but if the limitation be as in archer case  to I S for life remainder to the heir of the body of I S in the singular  number and to the heir of the body of such heir there I S be but tenant for  life and for the reason of this see king v mell vent Bowey v Lowdal roll style  SC cite in dubber v Trollope ub sup et vide Fearne count Rem et seq but in the  principal case the limitation make a estatetail in the land the good dispose  in same clause must go in the same manner and consequent the absolute property  be in the first devisee and no remainder of good after a estatetail be good  for the word heir of her body must not as to the land be construe to be word  of limitation and make a estatetail and as to the good to be only word of  designation of the person intend to take the good porter v Bradley t r but  that the same word as apply to different subject may receive different  construction vide forth v chapman p wms crook v de Vandes Ves Daintry v  Daintry t r roe v Jeffere t r do v cook east note e martial v Holloway swan  and beside his intention appear that the good shall go along with the house  and the devisee to have like interest in both the bill in this case be file by  the executor of the late Lord bergavenny against lady bergavenny his widow for  good under the above limitation and decree that on the death of lady Bellasis  who be the mother of lady bergavenny and have by her will limit the estate and  good as state in the print report the say good belong to Lord bergavenny and  on his death to the plaintiff his executor to who the defendant be by the  decree order to deliver the same Reg lib b fol vide Danvers v Lord Clarendon  ante Vol Vernon chancery case er p