case todd and his wife against Redford a declaration in a action of assault  and battery by husband and wife state that the defendant on such a day drive a  coach over the wife and bruise her by reason whereof the husband lie out  diverse sum of money for her cure et alian irregular the same to bring in ad  grave damnum Self be good though entire damage be give for the per quid be  only lie in aggravation and the alian irregular too general to suppose damage  give for it action of assault and battery be bring by the husband and wife the  declaration set forth that the defendant on such a day c assault Eleanor the  wife and drive a coach over her bruise her c et ration ind the husband lie out  to visit denar summas for the cure c et alian irregular the same to bring in  ad grave damnum Self the defendant plead in abatement that his name be Redborn  and not Redford and on issue and verdict for the plaintiff grove sergeant in  arrest of judgement move that in this case the husband and wife shall not have  join because the damage be lie to be for the money lie out in cure of the wife  as well as for the battery and entire damage be give it be have for the whole  and cite side Yelv vent cro lev but the husband shall have sue alone for the  money lie out in the cure Raymond for the plaintiff say be agree that the case  cite by grove be so but that they be all in action of assault commit by  husband and wife and in this case the tort be only upon the wife and the  ration ind c be only consequential damage and so be it hold in the case of  Russell v corn a salk S c Mod S c holt S c ld ray a in assault and battery  bring by husband and wife per quid to carry on business of the husband to stay  behind infectan for there judgement be give for the plaintiff because they  hold the per quid only consequential damage which be a case in point and the  alian irregular be not certain enough modern report to have damage and  therefore it be never consider by a jury Powell justice say that where husband  and wife join in a action of assault and battery for beat both it be wrong but  it may be help by a verdict separate the damage and here the get of the action  be only the beat of the wife a Yelv Brownl roll Rep cro James cro car a and  the ration ind be only in aggravation of damage b smith v Hexton stram Dix v  brook stram read v marshal Mod b as to the alian irregular it be modern report  er p too general to suppose damage give for it he say also that husband and  wife can join in assault and battery per quid consortium to send away for the  per quid in such case be the get of the action and in the case at bar if the  ration ind have be leave out the surgeon bill may have be give in evidence in  aggravation of damage judgement be give for the plaintiff holt chief justice  absent