between the parish OF saint Andrew and saint bride when a wife marry a second  husband and it be find the first have no access to her for a long time the  child of the second marriage be bastard and the wife settlement where the  first husband be Sess can p No case of Sett and Rem p No S c order of session  for the removal of a wife and three child from the parish of strange report er  p saint Andrew to the parish of saint bride set forth that a about twentythree  year since marry b and live with her five year in the parish of saint bride  and have by her four child two whereof be dead and the other two provide for  that at the end of five year be go away from her and marry another woman with  who he live somewhere in England but that be never see his first wife b from  the time of his go away b after the separation have hear nothing for a long  time of a marry a second husband by who she have eight child in the parish of  saint Andrew who all go by the name of the second husband five of they be dead  and the other three survive and the session presume that the second marriage  of the wife be void ab beginning adjudge that her settlement and that of the  three child be in the parish of saint bride where the first husband live as  deem the child the legitimate issue of the first marriage the court quash the  order as to the child and confirm it as to the wife first because the second  marriage and live with the second husband in saint Andrew be void ab beginning  and therefore the place of her settlement be where the first husband live  second it be adjudge that the first husband have no access for seventeen year  no presumption shall be admit but that these be the child of the second  marriage and they not be bear in the parish of saint bride nor have ever  inhabit there forty day can have no settlement in saint bride strange roll ab  r pl pl bract lib fol   Litt b roll Abr cro James Fleta lib c Bracton lib c    Litt a salk h all which case be quote to prove that improbability will  bastardize the issue and therefore it be argue a strong that impossibility  which be find in this case will bastardize also vide Pendrell v Pendrell post  and the note