case richardson versus gooding all Julii in court a and b partner in trade a  embezzles the jointstock and contract private debt and become bankrupt and the  partnership estate be assign by the commissioner first out of the jointstock  all the partnership debt be to be pay then whether out of a s share  satisfaction be not to be make for what he have embezzle of the stock  Richardson senior and Richardson junior and one gonson be partner together in  the trade of a drysalter gonson embezzles and waste the jointstock contract  private debt and become a bankrupt the commissioner assign the good in  partnership bill by the plaintiff for a account and to have the good sell to  the best advantage and insist that out of the produce of the good the debt owe  by the joint trade ought to be pay in the first place and that out of Gonsons  share satisfaction must be make for what gonson have waste or embezzle and  that the assignee can be in no better a case than the bankrupt himself and be  entitle only to what his three part will amount unto clear after debt pay and  deduction for his embezzlement and the court seem to be of that opinion but  send it to a master to take the account and state the case Reg lib b fol  afterward that Dec follow the cause come on upon the master report of money  receive by the assignee and receive on account of the partnership stock and  the decree be that the creditor in the say joint trade do come in before the  say master and prove their debt and such of the say debt as the say master  shall find do carry interest the say receiver and the assignee be to pay the  same off in the first place and the rest of the say creditor be to be pay in  proportion so far as the money in their hand will extend to pay but the say  creditor be first to give security to be allow of by the say master to be  answerable for what they shall receive as this court upon the say master  further report to be make in this cause shall think fit to direct Reg lib b  fol and Vernon chancery case er p this decree be afterward saint march affirm  on a petition of defendant to be hear against the same and the creditor of the  partnership prove their debt and be in the country be to be at liberty to give  such security as aforesaid before a master extraordinary to be approve of by  the say master Reg lib b fol there be two order afterward d June and d August  follow on the master report in confirmation Reg lib b fol vide west v skip ves  SC by name of skip v Harwood swan fox v Hanbury Cowp eddy v Davidson Doug  tailor v field Ves v Goodair Ves ex part king Ves rise ex part Reid rise