Bridgman I garth against ERSFEILD knight in cancellar observe upon Beavan v  Oxford de g m g in a to know facias to have execution of a recognizance of  eight hundred pound acknowledge in the chancery by sir Thomas Ersfeild the  father of the defendant the three of may James the case sir Thomas Ersfeild  the defendant father be seize in fee of diverse land and make a feoff to the  use of himself for life the remainder to the defendant his son in tail with  diverse remainder over with power of revocation by write under big hand and  sea and publish in the presence of three witness and then for the  consideration of four hundred pound do enter into this recognizance to the  plaintiff and die and whether this land be extendable or not against the son  be the question and I conceive that by the statute of the Elizabeth this  recognizance may be Bridgman I er p extend against the son the word of which  statute be and he it further enact by the authority aforesaid that if any  person or person have heretofore sitbence the beginning of the queen majesty  reign that now be make or hereafter shall make any conveyance gift grant or  demise charge limitation of use or use or assurance of in or out of any land  tenement or hereditament with any clause provision article or condition of  revocation determination or alteration at his or their will or pleasure of  such conveyance assurance grant limitation of use or estate of in or out of  the say land tenement or hereditament or of in or out of any part or parcel of  they contain or mention in any write deed or indenture of such assurance  conveyance grant or gift and after such conveyance grant gift devise charge  limitation of use or assurance so make or have shall or do bargain sell demise  grant convey sell or charge the same land tenement or hereditament or any part  or parcel thereof to any person or person body politic or corporate for money  or other good consideration pay or give the say first conveyance or assurance  gift grant demise charge or limitation not by he or they revoke make void or  alter accord to the power and authority reserve or express unto he or they in  and by the say secret conveyance assurance gift or grant that then the say  former conveyance assurance gift grant or demise as touch the say land  tenement and hereditament so after sell bargain convey dernize or charge  against the say bargainees vendees lessee grantee and every of they their heir  successor executor administrator and assign and against all and every person  and person which have shall or may lawful claim any thing by from or under  they or any of they shall be deem take and adjudge to be void frustrate and of  none effect by virtue and force of this present at so that this statute do not  only aid purchaser of the land but those who for a valuable consideration have  any charge out of the land or upon the land Bridgman I but it may be object  that the statute do make the revocable conveyance void only against the  bargainees vendees grantee and lessee but do not speak of any conuzee but I  answer that it appear by the forgo word that the statute intend to aid not  only bargainees oh but also all that have any charge out of the land or upon  the land a and although the last word of the statute do not speak express of  conuzees yet the statute shall be expound to extend to they and the statute of  west cap quod that who tenement data are in tail power to make strange c which  word seem only to restrain the donee in tail yet in the Edward form the issue  be thereby restrain and Edward formedon that tenant in tail can charge the  land no more then alien can forfeit the land so that if he grant a rend or  acknowledge a statute or recognizance or commit felony or treason and die the  issue shall have the land discharge and this statute have always be take as to  the equity thereof to relieve purchaser land those who have and therefore in  coke you b stand and bullock case mich Elizabeth where a man have convey his  land to the use of himself for life and then to the use of diverse other of  his blood with future power of revocation as after such a feast or after the  death of such a one and after and before the power of revocation commened he  for a valuable consideration do bargain and sell the land to another and his  heir this bargain and sale be within the remedy of the statute for although  the statute say the say first conveyance not by he revoke accord to the power  by he reserve which seem by the literal sense to be intend of a present power  of revocation for no revocation may be make by force of a future power until  it come in be yet it be hold that the intention of the Act be that such a  voluntary conveyance which be original subject to the power of revocation he  it in present or in future shall not be good against a purchaser bon fide upon  valuable consideration and if other construction be make the Act will signify  very little and it will be easy to evade such a Act and so if a have reserve  to he a power of revocation by the assent of b and then a bargain and sell the  land to another this bargain and sale be good and within the remedy of the say  Act Bridgman I er p