case Poulton Attorn c vers whether goddard executrix of Thomas Goddard in c b  plea that the defendant full administer ante display billae Self the plaintiff  where it ought to have be ante impetrationem short catalog de attachment hold  have Lutw Nels Lutw Com dig in a action upon the case for money due to the  plaintiff as attorney for the business of the testator the defendant plead  plene to manage ante display billae Self the plaintiff the plaintiff reply  that the defendant have do waste and upon demurrer it be allow that the  replication be have but then the plaintiff take exception to the plea because  that comens the plaintiff sue by writ of attachment if privilege and the  defendant say before the exhibition of the bill of the plaintiff she have full  administer where it ought to have be before the issue comens er p out of the  writ of attachment of the plaintiff and therefore in the case Lutw Royston  executor of Royston vers Barton in debt upon bind to the testator the  defendant plead a composition by two three of the creditor in number and value  accord to the statute stat W c a W and allege that the composition be make  before the exhibit of the bill of the plaintiff where the suit be in c b by  original writ and therefore the plea ought to have be before the sue out of  the original writ and for this cause judgement be give for the plaintiff and  it make no difference that here the suit be by a attorney who do not sue by a  original writ for the suit by writ of attachment be in the nature of a  original for as against other person the original be by summons in debt and by  attachment only in trespass and other action which be way arms so the atorneys  and other minister of c b have privilege to sue at all time by attachment if a  attorney sue by original he waive his privilege Richard bring king b Crompt  bring barn Richard bring c p imp bring c p imp bring b r b it be true that it  be usual say that atorneys c shall sue by bill For the privilege of atorneys  be in suit by bill see Richard bring king b and when a attorney of c b plead  his privilege he say it be the custom that no attorney be compellable to  answer any one upon original writ but by bill only Lut b Skinn SC lev S c c  and Inst it be say that the court of common plea can hold plea by bill against  the officer of the court and other person privilege and I allow if the suit  have be against a attorney the plea have be well for he may sue by a original  bill as be cite in I Lut and so if in b r the suit commence by bill of  Middlesex for a latitat always suppose a bill of Middlesex that be in the  place of a original there for all person there sue by bill be suppose to have  privilege of the court be in the custody of the marshal or present in the  court as atorneys or officer there so in a suit against a attorney of the  common plea who be suppose to be present in court the suit commence by bill  and the entry be as in b r that the plaintiff bring or that the plaintiff  exhibit his bill against the defendant I bro Ent but in a suit by comens a  attorney he may sue by writ of attachment of privilege that be the first  process for he and when the defendant be bring into court by this writ he  declare against he in like manner as other person declare upon a original writ  as appear by the precedent Lut bro Ent and if a man declare in the common plea  per to express grief and not upon a original writ original bill or writ of  attachment of privilege it be error as be rule Lut Dimock vers Witherell a  attorney of this court and judgement be there against the plaintiff for this  cause only comens de boundary pasch Anna in c b