anonymous Pas will B R what shall be good cause to set aside a award make by  rule of court and what not vide post far Jon Str side where a award be make by  rule of court it shall not be set aside unless there be practice with the  arbitrator or some irregularity as want of notice of the meeting also you  shall not take exception to the formality of it but shall perform it per holt  chief justice a a Vid kid c p in the case of Lucas ex they submission to  arbitration where a cause be depend remain as at commonlaw and the stat W be  make to put submission where there be no cause depend upon the same foot Lord  Mansfield say the court will not at all enter into the merit of the matter  refer to arbitration but only take into consideration such legal objection as  appear upon the face of the award and such objection as go to the behaviour of  the arbitrator the same be likewise rule in Waller v king pt can law Eq  Greenhill v church Ch Rep brown v brown can Ch vern where a submission be by  bind c and not by rule of court the only remedy against a improper award be by  bill in equity and it seem the ground for relief be the same as on submission  by rule in court of commonlaw if on cross application to set aside the award  and for a attachment the court of commonlaw be equal divide equity will  interpose ware be case cite atk ves a award will be set aside if the reference  be to three or any two of they and two improper exclude the three or if the  arbitrator have private meeting with one of the party conceal they from the  other Barton v knight vern or if the arbitrator toss up for choice of a umpire  the umpirage will be set aside vern so if the arbitrator differ between the  sum of and and the umpire award his servant have previous give out that his  master will award that sum vern pl anon so if the arbitrator promise to hear  witness or wait till one of the party be well and do not d so if a arbitrator  refuse to attend to state account and to defer make his award until the party  can talk with he respect they Spettigue v carpenter p W or use improper warmth  as to say will make you pay cost ware be case ante or when one arbitrator say  be shall consider and judge on plain fact and the other reply he shall not  mind fact but be convince that a have use b ill he will mulct his  representative Chicot v Lequesme Ves in the three precede case the arbitrator  be make to pay cost so where the arbitrator will not proceed without a sum of  money to be pay by the party and one party refuse the other pay the whole  Barnard so where the arbitrator appear to have a interest in the subject of  reference earl v Stocker vern a award will also be set aside if material  circumstance be suppress or conceal from the arbitrator atk S S comp v  Banstead vin ab where the submission be by rule of court the court will listen  to a application to have the award send back for reconsideration on the  suggestion that the arbitrator have not sufficient material perhaps to rectify  a trifle or apparent mistake vide champion v Wenham Ambl in Montefiori v  Montefiori ill Rep a award that a note which one of the party have give to the  other to assist he in his design of marriage by represent he as a man of  fortune shall be deliver up be set aside the arbitrator be clear mistake in  point of law Salkeld er p