case the queen against langley it be not a indictable offence to speak  unmannerly word of the mayor of a corporation or the justice of a county but  the offender may be bind to good behaviour S c salk S c salk S c ld ray S c  holt Langley be indict for these word speak to the mayor of Salisbury you Mr  mayor I do not care a fart for you you Mr mayor be a rogue and a rascal it be  urge that the indictment lie that the word tend to the disparagement of the  government who officer this person be but to the contrary it be say first that  it be not lie that he be then in the duty of his office or that he be a  justice of peace second as to the disparagement upon the government a  diversity be take between elective officer and such as be nominate by the  queen for the corruption of the first can reflect upon the government modern  the court he may have force he to find surety for his good behaviour or commit  he see the case of king v Derby Mod simmons v sweet cro Elizabeth dean case  cro Elizabeth a they also agree that whatever be a breach of the peace be  indictable as send a challenge but that these word be not a breach of the  peace but only occasional and tend towards it and after great deliberation  they adjudge the word be not indictable for it be not as much as say that he  be in the execution of his office or a justice of peace indeed if they be put  in write they will be a libel punishable either by indictment or action but  they be but lose unmannerly word like those speak of a alderman of hull when  he put on his gown Satan enter into it which be adjudge not indictable in  Kelynges time Mod b you be a forswear mayor and have break your oath not  indictable style c and bind he to his good behaviour be sufficient to secure  the authority of mayor but that must be do instant accord to doctor Bonhams  case   d holt chief justice say that word that direct tend to breach of peace  may be indictable but otherwise to encourage indictment for word will make  they as uncertain as action for word be