case Lydcott against willow a testator devise his house to a for life and  afterward devise to his wife the better to enable her to pay debt and legacy  all his message land tenement and hereditament not before dispose of this  devise carry the reversion in fee to the wife S c Eq ab S c vent S c Carth  Allen style salk raym vern comens Mod Peer wms ejectment a special verdict be  find videlicet that the testator be seize in fee of certain house in  Bedfordbury and in Parker lane do by will devise his house in Parker lane to  charitable use then he give several specific legacy to several person name in  the say will and then he devise his house in Bedfordbury to Edward Harris and  mary his wife for their life then follow these word videlicet the better to  enable my wife to pay my legacy I give and bequeathe to her and her heir all  my message land tenement and hereditament in the kingdom of England not before  dispose of c the question be whether this devise will carry the reversion of  the house in Bedfordbury to his wife adjudge that it do not but that it ought  to go to the heir of the testator who be plaintiff in this case it be find  that Harris and his wife be dead and that modern er p the wife who be  executrix have sufficient asset to pay the legacy without the reversion but  Powel justice be of another opinion for that the word hereditament import a  inheritance and if he have devise thus videlicet the inheritance not before  dispose of the reversion have pass see the case of Wheeler v Walroon Allen  baker v Edmonds style and do on the demise of palmer v Richard term Rep a a  writ of error be afterward bring in the exchequer Chamber upon this judgement  and accord to the opinion of Powel justice the judgement be reverse the same  point admit in the case of cook v Gerrard I lev and Hyley v Hyley ante it be  say however that this last case have be deny to be law I Eq case Abr but see  rook v rook vern Chester v Chester Peer wms sir Thomas Littleton case vent  stride v Falkland vern Goodtitle v knot Cowp do v sand a memorandum case  memorandum No certiorari to be grant without motion cro Elizabeth comens Mod  Mod salk Mod Mod Mod stram stram ld ray Cowp hawk p c ba ab a rule of court be  make that no certiorari shall go to the session of Ely without motion in court  or sign of it by a judge in his chamber modern but Mr pollexfen insist that  the session there do not differ from other court and franchise for the  inferior court in London be of as large a jurisdiction as any and yet a  certiorari go to they and so it ought to go to Ely for it be the right of the  subject to remove his cause hither their course in the royal franchise of Ely  be to hold the session there twice a year videlicet in march and September in  which two month the judge be seldom in town and if this court shall deny a  certiorari the court of common plea will grant it the attorneygeneral contra  this franchise of Ely be of great privilege and authority than any inferior  court for it have many regalia though it be not a county palatine a  certioraria will not lie to the grand session nor to a count that palatine to  remove civil cause it be true it lie to remove indictment for riot roll Abr  king v Lewis stram king v inhabitant of clace burr king v Griffiths term Rep a  and this franchise be true call royal have equal privilege with a county  palatine and therefore a certiorari will not lie but no rule be make