ambler case Lord strange against smith settlement to two daughter proviso if  either marry without the consent of their mother it shall be to her separate  use c the mother propose and encourage the marriage of one of her daughter  with ld S and afterward refuse her consent out of pique and resentment the  marriage be have without her consent and hold no forfeiture No entry in l r  Lincoln inn hall that march Hugh smith after marriage settle several estate in  England andIreland in default of issue male on his two daughter Dorothy and  Lucy in strict settlement with cross remainder that be a moiety to each with a  proviso in case either of they shall marry before they shall respective attain  twentyone without the consent of Dorothy their mother if live first have in  write under her hand or if she shall be dead without the like consent of  Leonard barrett and Charles smith or the survivor the estate for life limit to  they or either of they that shall so marry without consent shall from  thenceforth cease and barrett and smith shall immediate after such marriage  enter and receive and take the profit for the life of such daughter respective  upon trust to pay the rend and profit to the proper hand of such daughter or  daughter respective for her or their sole use or as she shall appoint it be  the intent and meaning that the same shall be for the peculiar maintenance and  expense of such daughter or daughter so marry without consent as aforesaid and  that the husband or husband shall in no wise intermeddle and that the same  shall not be subject to his or their debt Dorothy marry Mr Barry in the mother  lifetime but without her consent by which he become entitle to a moiety of the  estate to her separate use Lucy marry Lord strange and it be prove that mrs  smith the mother make the first offer of the match that she receive he at her  house and encourage his address and be in treaty with he and Lord Derby his  father about the settlement but that afterward some little difference arise  with regard to the settlement which be but trifle and she thereupon declare  she will have nothing to do with the Derby family that she then take offence  at ambler Lord strange on a story she have hear of his have reflect on her and  declare she will not consent to the match Lord Hardwicke chancellor Mr smith  have use the very mean to induce his daughter to break the obligation he mean  to lie on they for if they be fond of power and to get a separate right to the  estate independent of the person they intend to marry they have nothing to do  but to marry without their mother consent question whether here be sufficient  ground to vary the right of the party it appear to have be a very proper match  no objection make to Lord strange on any account till mrs smith be tell a  story of his have reflect on her she appear to have first propose the match  and encourage his address this case fall within the reason of Mesgret v  Mesgret vern and daily v Desbouverie atk the foundation of which be that the  withdraw consent after such encouragement be a delusion on the young folk and  it be not to be imagine after they have fix their affection by such  encouragement they will be easy induce to alter it lady strange not entitle to  her separate use N B mrs Barry appear in court and desire the rend of her  moiety may be pay to her husband but as the settlement direct they to be pay  to the daughter separate use or such person as they or either of they shall by  write appoint his lordship order a appointment under her hand to be lie before  the master for the justification and satisfaction of the trustee see Campbell  v Netterville Ves cite and the authority of the principal ambler er p case  have be recognize in merry v river Eden Dashwood v Bulkeley Ves clarke v  Parkins Ves see DAguilla v Drinkwater v b Pollock v cross mere but consent may  be withdraw upon good reason see Dashwood v Bulkeley and clarke v Parker where  sup see Burleton v Humphrey ante