atkins case Snelson versus Corbet and delve June b by his will say all my  freehold of any kind or nature whatsoever which at present be in my power to  dispose of I give to my wife Lord Hardwicke think it a point of some  difficulty direct a case to be make for the opinion of the court of king bench  sir Brian Broughton by his will say all in soever which at present be in my  power to dispose of I give to my wife the question be what interest pass to  the wife whether for life or in fee the testator be seize of a freehold estate  in fee and likewise of a reversionary estate in fee and of a copyhold estate  Mr Wilbraham for the defendant the devisee insist the word carry the fee and  cite Lutw and ibbetson versus Beckwith Cas in Chan in Lord Talbot time Lord  chancellor direct a case to be make for the opinion of the court of king bench  for he say it be hardly to be presume the testator intend to give the  reversion of this great estate to his wife there be a question likewise in the  cause as to paraphernalia whether it shall be liable to the payment of simple  contract creditor and legacy Lord chancellor at law where the husband die  indebt the widow can have her paraphernalia but this court do not determine so  strict for if the personal estate have be exhaust in payment of specialty  creditor she shall stand in their place as to so much upon the real asset of  the heir at law tip v tip p W tynt v tynt p W Northey v Northey ante atk Vol  townsend v Windham Ves so where there be a trust create for payment of debt  incledon v Northcote post atk for she have a prior right and a superior one to  legatee who take only from the bounty of the testator the personal estate must  be apply in payment of debt legacy and funeral in a course of administration  he direct in case the personal estate or any part have be exhaust by specialty  creditor then the simple contract creditor to stand in their place to receive  a satisfaction pro tanto out of testator real estate and declare that the  plate which belong to sir Bryan Broughton and which be give to the son after  the death of the widow be to be consider as part of his personal estate atkins  he declare also that in case the simple contract creditor of the testator  shall not receive a satisfaction for their debt out of the personal estate or  out of his real estate by stand in the place of specialty creditor in manner  before direct then the paraphernalia claim by the defendant or so much thereof  as will make good the deficiency shall be apply towards satisfaction of the  simple contract creditor but that the paraphernalia will not be liable to  satisfy testator legacy or any of they tip v tip p W Graham v Londonderry post  ad sir Brian Broughton by his will devise all he S plate to his wife and by  his codicil he only give the use of his household good to her for life Lord  chancellor if he have give by his will all his household good and plate I  shall have have some difficulty but the question now be whether he mean to  include plate in the word household good there be evidence of the plate be use  in the testator house and I be of opinion therefore household good do include  plate and that after the death of the wife it passes to the son so Lillcott v  Compton vern master v master p W Nicholls v Osborn p W Kelly v powlet Amb  contra Jesson v Essington Prec Charles atkins er p