chamber versus WARKHOUSE lev where a man may have a property in a dog trover  de sex young dog quatuor little dog after a verdict for the plaintiff it be  object that a cognomen in the signify little whelp and little dog whelp of any  sort as of dog fox c beside a man can have any property in whelp send per  curian it shall be intend whelp of dog and a man may have a property in a dog  for trespass lie for take away camem for hunting and the like action for kill  a mastiff hob dyer cro donative donative be either by royal foundation or by  royal licence or by original agreement with the ordinary but after it be  establish the ordinary have nothing to do with it it be visitable by the  patron commissioner it must be resign to the patron no lapse can incur but per  holt Ch just the ordinary have a power as to the parson though not to the  place for if the parson marry without a licence or commit a misdemeanour the  ordinary may punish he in that respect but he can regulate the seat in the  church and if the patron will not present the ordinary may compel he the  parson be exempt from attendance at visitation Salkeld er p it have be former  hold that a donative may be destroy by the presentation of the very patron but  in lad and widow case it be adjudge by holt Ch just and the court that though  a presentation may destroy a impropriation it can not destroy a donative  Salkeld because the creation thereof be by letter patent by which the land be  settle to that parson and his successor and he to come in by donation et per  Jones just institution to church be not a temporal but a papal institution  which be not receive in some place in England and where it be not receive they  go on in their old way and method and be call donative the incumbent of a  donative be cite into the spiritual court to take a licence from the bishop to  preach and the pretence be that it be a chapel and that the parson be  stipendiary et per curian if it be a donative and the bishop will visit a  prohibition shall be grant salk double plea