case wilson against Howard in trespass for twenty peck of wheat England four  load of wheat the England shall be reject trespass for take four load of wheat  with a continuando for a whole month there be judgement in the common plea by  nil to say and a writ of error bring and the error assign be modern er p first  that the word twenty peck of wheat England four load of wheat be insensible  for modius signify a bushel and it be not possible to make four load of twenty  bushel to which it be answer first the England be void and then the twenty  peck of wheat may be well understand second it be object that the trespass be  for break the plaintiff house with a continuando totan transgression for a  month which can be for a man must have some time to rest to which it be answer  that the continuando show the take be not all at the same time like the case  in the yearbook yearbook Henry pl a roll Abr a where trespass be bring for  take his good videlicet two load of wheat with a continuando to visit a day et  turn from such a day to such a day and hold good for a trespass may modern be  do in take such a quantity of good which can be remove in one day and  therefore the continuando be to show how it be do Mod Mod salk b beside where  a continuando be not well lie and entire damage give it shall be intend for  that only which can have a continuance Yelv c and so be the opinion of the  court in this case for the take the corn be lie to be on such a day  continuando transgression pillage from that day to such a day which be  insensible and so damage can not be give for that and a continuando may be lie  quoad fractionem house as well as foot ambulando but of that it be doubt for  if it have be continuando transgression pillage general it have be well enough  but it be totan transgression which can be for break a house there be another  objection videlicet that the defendant good et catalla adtunc et ibidem  recently invent to take in hand c which can be at one and the same time to  which it be answer that the word recently relate only to the time of declare  but the time be not material for he can give in evidence but on take the  judgement be affirm