case pool versus Guise eoden die after a estate have be hold under a extent  for a long time and have go through several hand whether upon a bill to redeem  the defendant shall account otherwise than at the extend value the bill be to  redeem a estate which have be actual extend on a judgement so long since as in  the that Elizabeth for the defendant it be say that though under a extent a  man have but a estate until what time the debt be satisfy and so the same be  always in its own nature redeemable yet after this length of time and after  the estate have go through five or six hand it be in the discretion of the  court to direct after what method the account shall be take that length of  time be now no bar in the case of mortgagee in nature of tenant by elegit vide  Yates v Hamble atk et vide Clobery v Symonds ante and that the defendant ought  not to account for more than the extend value a encumbrancer shall account  only accord to the extend value marsh v lee vent brace v Marlborough p wms et  vide Com dig vol title stat staple but this cause go off upon a proposition  that the defendant shall be allow what he pay and account only for what he  receive during his own time it appear by the register book that the defendant  sir John Guise have purchase part of the extend premise in question and have  expend in purchase in and defend the encumbrance large sum of money and the  decree be on the plaintiff offer to pay to the defendant sir John Guise what  he have lie out in buy in of the extent and encumbrance together with his  interest and cost discount what the say defendant have make and receive out of  the say extend premise that the plaintiff do produce before the master all  deed c relate to the premise in question and make out his title thereto and  that then the master do take the account between the party and see what be due  to the defendant sir John Guise on the say extend premise and what he have lie  out and expend in buy in of encumbrance and compute interest for the same and  allow he all such cost as he have be any way put unto in defend of suit touch  his title to the say premise since his purchase thereof and also tax say sir  John Guise his cost of this suit and all other just allowance discount and  deduct all such money as say sir John Guise have any way make or receive out  of the extend premise as well by the casual as by the annual profit thereof  since his purchase the same and on payment thereof plaintiff to be let into  possession Reg lib b fol Vernon chancery case er p