coke admiralty see mayor c of London v Cox lr hl Reg v Keyn ex b comb v de la  Bere Ch d the court will not grant a prohibition to the admiralty court after  sentence upon surmise that the matter be do infra corpus comitatus unless it  can be make to appear by good matter that it be do upon the land it be resolve  per totan curian that if one be sue in the admiralty court for right to some  such writ videlicet a writ to absolve he but excommunication be in the nature  of process to assist a demand against the party excommunicate it be necessary  to give the complainant in the spiritual court notice of the motion per Lord  chancellor Eldon Boraines case Ves Vid Bac ab excomm f vin ab excomm g note b  trollop case   a b so a prohibition lie after sentence if the libel be for a  thing within their jurisdiction and a temporal matter become incident and they  refuse such proof as the temporal court allow Com dig Prohib d gold v gapper  east note a Robert case ante p coke report er p a thing allege to be do upon  the high sea within the jurisdiction of the admiral and the defendant plead to  it and confess the thing to be do and after sentence be give the court will be  advice to grant a prohibition upon surmise that it be do infra corpus  cognitalus against their owd confession unless it call be make to appear to  the court coke by any matter in write or other good matter that this be do  upon the land for otherwise every one will stay until after sentence and then  for vexation only sue out a prohibition for although the admittance of the  party can give a jurisdiction to the court where it of right have none for  that it will be a encroachment upon the commonlaw yet when the court shall be  advice that it be mere for vexation and shall be intend for delay if the  prohibition shall not be sue forth till after sentence unless that he can show  good matter to the court to ascertain the court that this be not for vexation  it shall not be grant and admonition be give to they which sue forth  prohibition that they shall not keep they by long time in their hand and  notwithstanding proceed in the ecclesiastical court c and when they perceive  that they can prevail then to cast in their prohibition for if they abuse that  liberty to the damage and vexation of the party we will take such order as in  case of a writ of privilege if the defendant keep it until the juror be ready  c it shall not be allow