beak versus ken Trin W m b r rot Mod where a executrix plead several judgement  and that she have not asset ultra good I show Danv p assumpsit against the  defendant as executrix to John ken the defendant plead in bar three several  judgement obtain against her as executrix upon three several bind at the suit  of three person and that she have asset in her hand only to the value of S  liable to those several judgement the plaintiff reply separate to each  judgement videlicet that one half of the money recover on each bind be more  than be just due from the testator and that the plaintiff in each action be  Willing and have offer to accept the other moiety of the defendant in  discharge of the whole and upon payment thereof to release the several  judgement and that the defendant have sufficient asset ultra those judgement  be satisfy to pay the plaintiff and conclude several after plead the matter as  aforesaid videlicet that the defendant judge prediction deceptive she  intention ad defraudand decipiend the plaintiff have keep the say judgement on  foot the defendant rejoin general maintain her bar that she have not asset  ultra and traverse quod self prediction Carthew the defendant deceptive she  intention ad defraudand decipiend the plaintiff de financial loss nest predict  de judgment predict seu the dawn one exonerar seu to stretch out to carry  apart thus far full or judge I Inst Rep cro more h Danv p Carthew er p predict  seu the dawn alterurn in nest oak vigor to stay thus far to let pass ad  defraudand decipiend the plaintiff de financial loss nest predict modus form  prout c and upon a demurrer to this rejoinder it be show for cause that the  defendant ought to have rejoin several to every judgement and not to include  all three judgement in one general traverse because it must be a great  disadvantage to the plaintiff to take issue thereon for if he shall join issue  upon the fraud in all the judgement and if one shall be find not to be keep on  foot by fraud the issue will be against he and on the other hand it will be no  good issue to plead general that judge predict sive the dawn one be continue  by fraud and therefore it be infer that the defendant ought to have make  several traverse say per curian the rejoinder be good because the traverse be  that all or any of the judgement be keep on foot by fraud and if issue have be  join that all the judgement be keep on foot by fraud and it have be find that  one of they alone have be keep c by fraud this issue have be find for the  plaintiff because the plea be false in part and for that reason the whole be  false therefore this general form of plead can be no disadvantage to the  plaintiff as be pretend for he may have take issue that all be continue by  fraud or else he may have single out one of the judgement and take issue upon  that alone the plaintiff see the open of the court pray leave to discontinue  which be grant