case JESSON versus JESSON Cf on point of satisfaction case collect in hale v  Darell Bea v Feb post case by a marriagesettlement a term foe year expectant  on failure of issue male be raise for secure pound portion for daughter not  prefer in the life of the father Payable at eighteen or marriage there be a  son and two daughter the father in his lifetime by a sale of part of his  estate raise pound for his daughter which by another deed be make Payable at  twentyone or marriage and die leave also a son by a former marriage who die a  infant without issue this pound though Payable at a different time and though  not intend to go as part of the portion there be a son then live shall be take  as part of the pound portion Vernon chancery case sir William Jesson by  settlement in d and that January on his marriage with Penelope Villars and in  consideration of pound portion secure to be pay by sir George Villars limit  several manor and land to himself for life remainder to Penelope his intend  wife for life remainder to first and other son of the marriage remainder to  trustee for the term of one thousand year remainder to the heir heir male of  the body of sir William remainder to his own right heir and as to the term for  one thousand year the trust thereof be declare to be that in case there shall  be no issue male of that marriage or if such issue male shall die without  issue before twentyone or marriage and there shall be one or more daughter  between they not prefer in the lifetime of the say sir William Jesson and  Penelope then if one daughter if two or more to be equal divide between they  at eighteen or marriage if not pay trustee after the death of sir William and  dame Penelope without issue male may raise it by lease or sale and what  maintenance they think fit in the mean time and then the term to attend the  inheritance provide if the next in remainder shall pay c the term to cease  march sir William Jesson demise several message c unto sir William Villars and  woollaston for ninetynine year if sir William shall so long live upon trust by  rend issue and profit to raise inter alian pound for the portion of Penelope  and whether Margaret and Thomas the four young child infant and unmarried  thereupon sir William Villars and sir William Jesson agree to sell the  TrustEstate be a term for ninetynine year determinable on the death of sir  William Jesson for of which two hundred pound be to be pay to sir William  Jesson and pound to sir William Villars which he agree to accept in lieu of  the pound by this trust provide for the two survive daughter may sir William  Jesson die leave issue the plaintiff his old son by a former venture and  Villars Jesson and two daughter by his last wife Villars Jesson die without  issue a infant Vernon chancery case the question be whether the pound raise by  sir William Jesson out of his own estate for life shall be take in part of the  pound now become due and Payable unto the two daughter by the  marriagesettlement on failure of issue male of that marriage it be insist by  the defendant counsel that the pound ought not to go in part of the pound  first it be not declare by sir William Jesson that it shall go or be take in  part and sir William Villars the trustee examine in the cause swear it be not  discourse of nor intend to go in part second by the marriagesettlement the  portion be to be pay at eighteen or marriage by the late deed at twentyone or  marriage and if die before to survive per cur decree the pound to go and be  take in part of the pound portion Reg lib a fol the decree declare that the  court be full satisfy that sir William Jesson do not intend that the plaintiff  Penelope and whether his daughter shall have more than the pound devise  between they for their portion it Vernon chancery case er p may have be a  question whether the daughter shall have more than the pound but no question  whether that shall go in part and cite the case of Blois and Blois Ch Rep vent  S c vide husband v husband ante vol aas case cite in note there also Hoskins v  Hoskins pre Ch goldsmid v goldsmid swan and case collect in note c where even  a legacy shall go in part and all the precedent be that there shall not be a  double provision or double satisfaction and cite Elkenheads case who have make  his will and thereby devise pound apiece to each of his five daughter and  after legacy pay give the surplus of his land equal among his five daughter  and give pound portion with one of they in marriage she be exclude from the  pound intend by the will Vernon chancery case de boundary paschae in curian  porter