chancery report thompson contra atfield car f marriage settlement the bill be  to discover a purchase deed of Frogpoole purchase by Henry atfield the  plaintiff great grandfather to he and his heir and that William Thompson the  plaintiff grandfather marry mary the old daughter of the say Henry atfield who  declare that he have make the purchase aforesaid for the benefit of the say  William and mary his wife and for the heir of the say mary and that he will  settle the same accord but the say Henry atfield die before any such deed be  execute yet the say William and mary be in possession long before the death of  the say Henry and pay no rend and the say Henry leave a son at his death  videlicet John atfield the defendant father who have a great affection for  Anthony Thompson the plaintiff father who be the son and only child of the say  William and mary his aunt a match be propose between the say Anthony and  Elizabeth smith the plaintiff father and mother which take effect but before  and in consideration of the say marriage the say John atfield the defendant S  father settle the say premise on the say chancery report Anthony the plaintiff  father and his heir for ever and the say Anthony have by the say Elizabeth the  plaintiff his old son and heir but the defendant pretend the say deed be  defective in law to have which deed make good and supply the defect thereof by  equity by the defendant accord to the intent of the original settlement make  by John atfield the defendant father be the bill the defendant insist there  can be no such marriage agreement for settle the premise as aforesaid for that  mary sue her mother and have her portion out of the personal estate and though  the defendant father may intend to give the plaintiff father the premise and  seal a deed for that purpose yet he alter his mind and never perfect it and  there be no consideration for his so do and the defendant insist he ought to  enjoy the premise for that by the plaintiff own show his Title be defective  and therefore ought not to receive any countenance in a court of equity  against the defendant who be heir at law to his father and grandfather and  come in and ought to have the aid of the court to protect his Title chancery  report but the plaintiff counsel insist that the defendant detain of the say  deed be a fraud and the consideration of make the say deed be valuable and  there be no defect therein but want of livery and seize which defect this  court have often supply when no fraud appear in gain the deed this court the  say deed appear to be fair execute by the defendant father and that there be  no defect therein save only the form of livery and seize and make on such  valuable consideration as marriage decree the defendant to execute livery and  seize in the say deed and make far assurance of the say premise to the  plaintiff and his heir and the plaintiff be decree to enjoy the same against  the defendant chancery report er p