ambler case obrien against obrien Lord chancellor may injunction to stay  tenant for life from commit waste by cut tree grow for ornament l and saplins  not proper to be fall see Lord castlemain v Lord craven Eq can Abr vin Abr  chamberlain v Dummer bro c S c ib Vol lady Strathmore v bow bro c c lib Reg b  foe S c bro c c in note by indenture date that march between the defendant  Henry obrien and Margery his wife of the first part Henry stainer and Edward  hogan of the second part Richard connell and pool Hickman esqr of the three  part Francis Burton and Robert Hickman esqr of the four part and William  stainer of the five part in consideration of a marriage thentofore have  between the defendant Henry obrien and Margery his wife and in performance of  certain article date the that of October the manor c of Blatherwicke in the  county of Northampton and Tixover in the county of Rutland be among other  estate convey to trustee to the use of the say defendant Henry obrien for life  without impeachment of waste remainder to trustee to preserve contingent  remainder remainder to the first and other son of the marriage between he and  the say Margery in tail male remainder to the first and other son of the say  Henry or any aftertaken wife in tail male remainder to the plaintiff Donatus  obrien the father for life without impeachment of waste remainder to his first  and other son in tail male with other remainder over Henry obrien the first  tenant for life have convey his life estate to the defendant sir Edward obrien  and he threaten to cut down all the tree and timber grow on the estate in  England the plaintiff file their bill against the defendant pray a injunction  to stay the defendant from commit any waste on the estate state the above  settlement that Henry have no issue by the say Margery and that they have be  long separate that great part of the timber tree grow on the say estate be  stand and grow in a walledin park call Blatherwicke park and stand near the  capital seat of the family and other house upon the say estate and either  serve for the shelter thereof or be set in row walk vistoe avenue or clump and  be great ornament ambler thereto great part whereof be of a late growth be  plant about twentyfive year before and many thousand of they be young sapling  great beneficial to the estate but of very small value if cut down not be  worth above S d apiece one with another may upon a affidavit of the above fact  Mr solicitorgeneral Mr Wilbraham and Mr Waller this day move that a injunction  may be award to stay the defendant from commit any waste or spoil on the  premise his lordship order that a injunction shall be award to stay the  defendant c from cut down any timber tree or other tree grow on the say estate  which be plant or grow there for ornament or shelter of the mansion house or  that grow in vistoe plant walk or line for the ornament of the park part of  the premise in question and also from cut down any sapling grow on any other  part of the estate in question not proper to be fall until answer and other  order to the contrary see sir Hubert Packington case atk Charleton v Charleton  cite there Leighton v Leighton bro in note chamberlain v Dummer bro c c ib vol  the form of the order in the last case which see in Mr belt edition of brown  vol p and in Eden on injunction be now common use see Ves in note see  Strathmore v bow bro g c William v MNamara Ves Lord Tamworth v Lord Ferrer Ves  attorneygeneral v duke of Marlborough mad bishop of London v web p W so where  tree be plant to shut out a object on view day v merry Ves and where clump of  tree be plant on a common at a distance for the benefit of the view marquis of  Downshire v Sandys Ves see mad Ch bring v Copley mad Rep but if gap be make by  tempest to cut the tree for uniformity be not waste Lord Bohemia v Lord  Stanhope roll march mad Ch bring see lushington v boldero mad ambler er p