case Boughton against Boughton LincolnsInnHall December refer to Worral v  Jacob mere consider Cecil v butcher I W refer to patch v shore l I Ch a father  make a voluntary settlement on his family without power of revocation insert  and afterward make a contrary disposition by will this will not affect the  former settlement S c atk Edward Boughton father to the five young lady the  plaintiff settle his estate on himself for life remainder to his wife for life  for her jointure remainder to the first and other son in tail and in default  of issue male limit a term of five hundred year to trustee to raise two  thousand pound apiece for all such daughter he shall have remainder to his own  right heir Edward have issue only daughter the plaintiff and have in himself a  remainder to his own right heir make February the follow deed and in these  word whereas I have heretofore by several letter promise a certain gentleman  three thousand pound with my daughter Hannah and my estate at my death if he  will take the name of Boughton upon he but whereas he have affront I and lest  he shall take advantage of they after my death I do hereby charge all my  estate with four thousand pound apiece for all my child with a hundred pound  to my sister cook and five hundred pound apiece to her two son and I do hereby  bind myself my heir c in the sum of twentyfive thousand pound to my child  their executor c if all my estate at my death shall not be equal divide among  they except the money give to my sister cook and her two son Edward afterward  by will dispose of his estate in a very contrary manner to the last deed the  bill be bring against the devisees and trustee of the will the question be  whether the will can have any effect to revoke the deed and the case of  Clavering v Clavering a vern S c Prec Chan S c brown p c a be cite for the  plaintiff and the case of Naldred v Gilham b Peer wms b for the defendant  Hardwicke Lord chancellor say that as this be a deed former execute in the  lifetime of Edward Boughton and a voluntary modern report settlement without a  power of revocation it will not be subject to a revocation by the will for if  it be there will be no difference between a deed with a power of revocation  and one without that the case of Naldred v Gilham be where a old woman execute  a voluntary settlement of her estate which she always keep by her in favour of  her nephew a copy of this be surreptitious get by the nephew father the old  woman change her mind and make a different disposition by will and after her  death a bill be bring to set up the copy against the will and the master of  the roll decree the copy to be good because the original be lose but upon a  appeal to Macclesfield Lord chancellor the decree be reverse for as it be only  a voluntary settlement and keep always by the party it must be presume she  intend to have a power over it and he refuse to show any kindness to a copy  gain so fraudulent or to a voluntary settlement under such circumstance that  in this case the deed be not destroy and that as it be for the provision of  child it be a kind of a consideration and that it shall take place of all  other voluntary settlement and therefore of the will which be voluntary but  not of debt or other settlement for valuable consideration modern report er p  the defendant counsel urge that the two thousand pound apiece secure to the  daughter by the settlement be to be include and make up a part of the four  thousand pound and therefore what be not give to the daughter by the deed be  well devise by the will