case Rudyard versus NEIRIN ux freeman S c Eq Abr c S C e contra wms n a woman  have pound in possession and pound in the chamber of London on her marriage  the husband father in consideration of this fortune settle pound per and  jointure on her the husband die and the wife administer to he and the  representative of the husband father bring a bill for the pound in the chamber  of London the father be as allege a purchaser of it by the settlement bill  dismiss the husband have do nothing to alter the property in his lifetime the  defendant Hannah be daughter of Mr Hampton on a marriage treaty between her  and the plaintiff testator son Thomas Rudyard in consideration of precedent in  chancery er p pound pay or secure to be pay to the father and son or one of  they in part of her portion and in consideration of more due and owe to her by  the chamber of London and other expectance out of the personal estate of her  father and in consideration of S a settlement be make on her by way of  jointure and a covenant in the deed that the jointure land be of the clear  yearly value of pound per and the marriage be have and Thomas Rudyard the son  die intestate without issue and without make any alteration of the debt due  from the chamber of London to his wife she take out administration to he and  afterward intermarry with the defendant Thomas Rudyard the father die have  make his will and his wife executrix who never demand this precedent in  chancery debt but die have make her will and the plaintiff her executrix and  there have be a little before the death of Thomas Rudyard the father a act of  parliament make for turn the chamber debt into a perpetual interest the  plaintiff as executrix of mary Rudyard who be executrix of Thomas Rudyard the  father bring this bill against the defendant to have a account of this debt  and to have it assign to her for that as it be allege the settlement do amount  to a agreement that the father shall have the benefit of this debt the  settlement be make by he and this be part of the consideration and therefore  she as his representative entitle to the benefit of it or if it shall be take  upon the word of this deed that the father and son be joint entitle to it the  father will have the whole by survivorship or if it be to go equal to the  father and son she as representative of the father will be entitle to a moiety  of it the defendant insist that when he marry his wife he take this debt to be  her own and that this do not amount to a agreement that either father or son  shall have this debt otherwise than as it do belong to the wife and though it  be true he as her husband may have dispose of it yet have do nothing of that  kind it do now belong to the wife that have survive he and of that opinion be  my Lord keeper and dismiss the bill