case lord brook against lord gore if the king grant a office by patent or make  a demise for year the acceptance of a new patent in the one case or of a new  lease in the other be no surrender of the first grant roll Abr vent Bl Rep Com  dig term Rep upon the LordKeepers request all the justice and baron be  assemble for their resolution in the case betwixt Lord brook and Lord gore  which be thus queen Elizabeth in the nineteenth year of her reign grant to  fulk grevill Esq the office of the clerk of the council of the march of Wales  for his life and by another patent Elizabeth grant to he the office of  secretary there for his life and in James without recital of these patent the  say king grant the say office to sir fulk grevill then knight for his life  after in James the king recite the say patent of James grant those office to  Adam Newton for his life when after the death surrender or forfeiture of the  say sir fulk grevill they shall become void and after in James by another  patent recite the patent of I and James and omit the grant and Elizabeth the  say king grant the say office to John to hunt and John mallet habendum for  their life cum post death of the say fulk grevill or Adam Newton surrender  forfeiture or other determination well elsewhere wherever modus the say office  shall be void or shall come to the king band to dispose with a non to stand  before a male nominand or a male to read out prediction offician et non to  stand before male to read out male nominand well non to read out some gift  well permission praeantea factum de duty prediction and whether the patent of  James be good or not be the question it be argue several day videlicet by  Hedley sergeant against the patent James and by Noy for the patent and at  another day by bank against the patent and by finch sergeant for the patent  croak car and it be agree by all the justice and baron that the patent of  James croak car er p be mere void for first it be agree by the counsel of each  side that the patent of and Elizabeth be good and nothing object against they  then sir fulk grevill be the patentee and alive and he accept a now patent in  I throw l without recite the former patent and not any non to stand before  therein it be clear void as it be agree in Harris v wing a that if lessee for  year of the queen take a new lease for year of the same thing without recital  of the former lease it be mere a void lease and no surrender of the former  lease and it be strong in this case for the grant of a office can be surrender  by the take of a second grant for there be not any revocation thereof second  it be agree by all the justice and baron that the patent of James recite the  patent of I James as a good grant which be void and no non to stand before  therein this grant be mere void three the principal question be whether the  clause of non to stand before in the patent of James make it good for  otherwise without a non to stand before it be agree by they all that it be  void because it recite the two patent which be void and omit the recital of  the two patent which be good and make the habendum after the death or  determination of the say patentee which be void so the king be deceive in his  grant and misinform and whether the non to stand before do help it be the  principal question hide chief justice hold clear as to that point that the non  to stand before help it and make it a good patent because the king relinquish  the advantage of nonrecital or false recital and intend to grant it by  whatsoever mean the same shall become void Jones seem to doubt thereof and  will not deliver any opinion herein but Richardson chief justice of the common  plea Hutton Harvey and Damport justice of the common plea Denham Trevor and  Vernon baron of the exchequer Whitlock and myself justice of the king bench  conceive that this patent of James be mere void by reason of those misrecitals  which be not proper misrecitals or false recital but rather false information  or suggestion whereby the king be deceive for by intendment the king conceive  those grant be good which be void and grant those office after the  determination of the say grant well elsewhere quocuque modus c so the king be  deceive and the non to stand before shall not aid such false information and  false suggestion   chandois case Elizabeth dyer blague case but there be not  any certificate make of these judge opinion because the party compound