case thomas gwin and bridget his wife against david gwin Hilary term car roll  in a quod ei deforce against husband and wife if the wife plead as tenant for  life of part of the premise with reversion to her husband and say nothing as  to the residue and judgement be give against both as to all the premise it be  erroneous S C godb Inst Jones Cowp dougl error of a judgement in the grand  session in the county of Brecknock by David Gwin in a quod ei deforce  protestand attendance breve mock in form et naturan short catalog de recto ad  common feature law secundum form to cause to stand Rutland de three messuagiis  promontory terrae promontory prati promontory pastur et promontory bosci et  center point molendini in Llaunyhagell et law et heir svan et unde to say quod  ipsemet to be seisitus de property prediction et center point prediction  molendini in of his ut de fee et jure c et quod tale sit law suum offer c and  the say Thomas and Bridget when et defen law predict David et seisinam c and  imparle c  At the next session the plaintiff count ut before verbatim and the  defendant Bridget plead that she majus law to have to hold promontory terrae  promontory prati et promontory pastur parcel property modus petit pro boundary  vitae of oneself return ind a saying beforehand thomae et heir nest how  prediction David to have ad tenendum property prediction c et de hoc to put  down see super native land et prediction David similiter et prediction Thomas  to say quod ipse to have majus law to hold property prediction et center point  predict molendini cum appurtenance ut that tenet how prediction David c et de  hoc to put down c et prediction David similiter the jury find both issue for  the demandant and judgement enter quod recupere versus a see the statute James  c the James c and the Geo c croak car er p say beforehand advance thomam et  Brigettam prediction property et center point prediction molendini cum  appurtenance tenant Himself et heir nest quiet de a saying beforehand Thoma et  Brigetta et heir nest in continuous c upon this judgement a writ of error be  bring and because the writ of error suppose that the proceed be in curian our  men where it appear by the record that the beginning thereof be in James  therefore the writ of error be abate and a new writ of error bring in person  we resident and upon it diverse error be assign by Mr Prothoro first that the  write be a quod ei deforce the protestation be attendance in naturan short  catalog de recto he ought to show what writ of right for there be diverse kind  of writ of right but that be disallow second that the defence be not well make  for in a writ of right there ought to have be a double defence videlicet the  plaintiff right and to maintain his own right croak car three that the  defendant join in defence ought not to have sever in their plead fourthly that  the plaintiff have admit they to plead several plead and take several issue  upon their several plead have admit that they be several tenant and so have  abate his own writ five because Bridget plead as tenant for life for part of  the tenement allege the reversion to be in Thomas and for the residue plead  nothing nor claim any estate yet judgement be give against Thomas and Bridget  and their heir for all the tenement and so a final judgement against the feme  for all where she plead but to part and against her heir where she claim but  for life and this be hold a manifest error wherefore for this cause principal  the judgement be reverse