case barlow ux versus Heneage December Eq Abr c S c a father make a voluntary  settlement to trustee and their heir in trust to receive the profit and to put  they out for the increase of the fortune of his daughter a and b and also  execute a bind to the same trustee to pay they pound at a certain day in trust  for the say daughter but keep both deed and bind by he till his death and  receive the profit and then by will take notice of the bind give legacy to a  and b in satisfaction thereof and the surplus of his personal estate to his  say two daughter and his four young child yet a and b elect to have the  benefit of the settlement and bind decree for they and a account of the profit  from the date of the settlement and the pound with interest from the time it  be Payable by the bind the case be George Heneage make a voluntary settlement  to trustee and their heir in trust that they shall receive the profit and put  they out precedent in chancery from time to time for the increase of the  fortune of his daughter Winifred the now plaintiff and Cicely and if either of  they die before or marriage the whole to go to the survivor and enter into a  bind of pound penalty to the same trustee to pay pound to they at a certain  day in trust for the say daughter but keep both deed and bind in his own power  and receive the profit of the estate till his death afterward by will take  notice of the say bind he give to his say two daughter legacy in full  satisfaction of the benefit of the say bind and the surplus of his personal  estate after debt and legacy pay to go equal between the say daughter and his  four young child the plaintiff bring this bill to have a account of the  personal estate and a satisfaction for the profit of the settle estate from  the date of the settlement and the pound with interest from the time it be  Payable it be object that the settlement and bind be both voluntary and always  keep precedent in chancery er p by the father in his own hand and so may have  be destroy when he please be to be take only as a cautionary provision in case  of sudden death and therefore they ought not to have either profit or interest  far than from the death of the father and the rather for that otherwise it  will swallow up all the personal estate and leave the young child unprovide  for but my Lord keeper say these be the father deed and he can not derogate  from they but at last the defendant agree to set the profit of the land  receive during the father life against the two daughter maintenance but insist  to have interest on the bind f or the time the money be Payable and it be  decree accord