Bulstrode Shuttleworth plaintiff against the corporation OF lincoln defendant  a writ of restitution for a alderman upon a writ of restitution the case  appear to be this a alderman of Lincoln be remove for cause and Shuttleworth  elect alderman in his place afterward the alderman first remove the cause of  his removal appear to be insufficient pray to have a writ of restitution to be  restore again unto his place of alderman which be grant unto he by the court  with a rule to remove Shuttleworth again and to restore the other afterward  one of the alderman die and so another place now become void and Shuttleworth  who be remove upon the writ of restitution and by the rule of the court in  regard that he have now undergo the office and charge of major of that  corporation and there now be a place there void and they by their charter be  to have twelve alderman he move the court for a writ of restitution to be  restore to his place again the court answer that they can not write to they to  elect such a one this court be only to deal in case of restitution by grant of  writ of restitution upon have and undue removal the corporation there have a  free election among they and so they be to elect accord croak justice  Shuttleworths election the validity of this rest only upon the cause of  removalof the first whether the cause be good or not if good then Shuttleworth  a good alderman but if the cause prove not good but the first restore again as  here he be by a writ of restitution and the rule of the court he be then in  his place position quo prius and Shuttleworth be remove he be now likewise  position quo prius no alderman nor can he be any without a new election by the  corporation for he have now no right at all by force of his former election if  the first cause of removal be not good and the right of Shuttleworth rest only  upon this and upon his restitution but there be very great reason that the  corporation shall again elect he if they have a place now void the whole court  clear of opinion against the grant of a writ of restitution as this case be  unto Shuttleworth for he can be restore to the place of a alderman to a new  place by force of his former election for by his removal he be now position  quo prius no alderman and so not to be restore to the place of a alderman and  so the writ of restitution deny by the whole court