case castle against Hobbs Trinity term James roll the king be seize in fee of  the manor of d grant all his message land rend reversion and hereditament in d  hereafter name videlicet all that annual rend of fifteen shilling and other  service issue out of the land of a b who be a copyholder for life of land  parcel of the say manor at the rend of fifteen shilling a lev lev ray salk Mod  will will will Com dig b hob vent b r h Bac Abr c hob cro James   lev Leon  strange croak car er p a year this grant be not sufficient to convey the land  of the copyholder for rend and seize only be mention   b to Rep to Rep in  ejectment on a special verdict if the jury submit a particular point to the  court the court will intend every thing that be necessary to their give  judgement cro James post Bac Abr peer wms term Rep term Rep ejectment for land  in Donnington upon not guilty plead a special verdict be find that William  read be copyholder for life of certain land parcel of the manor of Donnington  pay fifteen shilling ayear to the lord of the manor and that king Henry the  eight be seize in fee of this manor year tricessimo quint royal power Himself  for the sum of grant by his letter patent to Richard Andrews and Peter temple  to they and their heir inter alian in all respects messuagia land property To  give back return the condition of a slave et hereditamenta svan in Donnington  to write underneath videlicet totum that one year old To give back quindecim  undivided et alian the condition of a slave exeunt de terris William read et  such separate elsewhere To give back de copyholder ac totum mock messuagium et  sex made of twigs striped terrae in Donnington in tenure I d habendum et  tenendum in all respects prediction messuagia land property To give back  return the condition of a slave et hereditamenta in Donnington predict to the  say Richard Andrews and Peter temple and their heir and whether the say patent  be a good patent to convey the say land in the tenure of William read as  aforesaid they pray the discretion of the court and if it be a good patent  they find for the defendant and if not they find for the plaintiff and  thereupon it be argue by Bridgeman for the plaintiff and by crew for the  defendant Bridgeman show that it can be a good patent to convey those land to  Andrews and temple because nothing be grant but the rend of fifteen shilling  and the service of William read whereby be intend only the rend and service  which be due from he as a freeholder and there be not any mention of land to  be grant or that it be copyhold and it shall not be say to be a pass of the  freehold of the copyholder and therefore the king be deceive in his grant  nothing pass from he and so the grant void sergeant Thomas crew show that this  patent be to pass the rend of the copyholder and freehold of the copyholder in  fee otherwise the patent shall be construe void wherein these word croak car  of the king grant be particularize videlicet totum mock messuagium et sex made  of twigs striped terrae habendum messuagium land c which imply that there be  no misprision in the patent for thereby a message be grant which can be unless  the copyhold shall pass wherefore he conceive it shall pass by construction  and he move that if the patent wear void yet the plaintiff can not have  judgement for it be find that king Henry the eight be seize in fee and make  that patent which if void then the land be again in the crown and no title be  find for the plaintiff he can have any judgement but all the court conceive it  be a void patent to convey the land of the copyholder to Andrews and temple  for first there be not any land grant but the rend and service of William read  which be intend freehold and there be none such the grant be mere void and for  the second point they all conceive forasmuch as the jury have find that if it  be a good patent then for the defendant if otherwise they find for the  plaintiff it be intend that there be a sufficient title find for the plaintiff  unless by this patent it be defeat and avoid so that if the jury be satisfy  that the plaintiff have any good right by any other manner of title the court  ought not to doubt thereof as it be resolve in Goodales case   and it be  adjudge for the plaintiff croak car er p