case collins versus Griffith Lord chancellor king Eq can ab pl pl two obligors  in a bind bind joint and several and one die the executor of the decease  obligor may be sue in equity for the debt without make the survive obligor a  party a b and c be bind joint and several in a bind to I S c die I S bring a  bill against the executor of c for a discovery of his personal estate and for  a account thereof and to be pay out of asset the defendant demurrer and show  for cause that it appear that the bind be a joint bind which be a mistake it  be joint and several also for that the other obligors ought to be party to the  suit and to the account that be to be direct of what be due upon the bind for  perhaps the other obligors may have pay the whole or at least part of the bind  and there ought to be but one account take otherwise there may be a  multiplicity of suit and the defendant liable to a double account Lord  chancellor this appear to have be a bind as well several as joint and as the  obligee may sue it several at law so may he also in equity if it be not so  there will be no peer William difference in equity betwixt a joint bind and  one joint and several and if any of the obligors have pay all or part the  obligor who be sue or his representative must bring a bill and have it allow  and it must also lie upon he to compel the other obligors to contribute  towards payment of the debt the creditor lend his money upon term to have a  security upon which he may sue the obligors several if he think fit and indeed  if it be otherwise that which be intend to strengthen the security will tend  to hurt it extreme for I may not be able to find they all out and by the same  reason that all the obligors be to be sue if any be dead their heir as well as  executor be to be make party and then as it will be difficult to commence the  suit so the suit when commence will be subject to continual abatement which  will be a great difficulty on a honest creditor who have fair lend his money  whereupon the demurrer be overrule with great clearness say vide Madox v  Jackson atk anon freeman Blois v Blois vent Eq can ab pl Ashurst v Eyre atk  atk Lawson v wright Cox angerstein v clark dick swan n Cockburn v Thompson Ves  Haywood v ovey mad Bland v winter S S