case William MERREITT versus John EASTWICKE and and his wife administratrix of  huge pierce novembris in court a have a bill remit to he beyond see a for a  particular purpose receive part of the money and take a note for the remainder  Payable to himself or bearer and fall ill give the note to b with order to  receive the money and apply it to the use it be design and then die b receive  the money and apply it accord the administratrix of a bring trover and recover  b bring a bill and be relieve this day the Lord keeper be send for to the  trial of the money in the pix vide the prefix to his complete lawyer Mr baron  Atkins sit and go on with the cause and this cause then come on to be hear the  case be that the king of Denmark send over the say Hugh pierce his huntsman  into England and remit to he a bill of exchange for pound S d draw upon one  jacobson a merchant in London to buy horse and dog he receive all the money  except pound and lie it out accord and deliver up the bill of exchange and for  the other two hundred pound take note from jacobson Payable to himself or  bearer on demand and then fall ill and short afterward die but in his sickness  deliver to the plaintiff in Vernon chancery case er p who house he lodge this  note for and order he to lie out the money in horse and dog for the king of  Vernon chancery case Denmark use which he accord do and afterward go to  Denmark and carry over the horse and dog which have be buy and account with  the king for the money and receive a gratuity for his trouble after the death  of Hugh pierce the defendant whether his wife take out administration and she  and her now husband bring a action of trover against the plaintiff for this  two hundred pound and recover a verdict the bill be to be relieve as to relief  on bill file after verdict vide Barbone v burn ante p and case cite there upon  the hear of the cause Mr baron Atkins be of opinion the plaintiff come too  late after a recovery at law and will have dismiss the bill but sir Samuel  clarke sir mile cook and sir William Beversham the master in chancery stand up  and oppose it be of opinion that there ought to be relief and a decree for the  trust and thereupon the court be divide no order be make vide as to this point  smith v turner post Shapland v smith bro Ch Rep and the cause stand in the  paper the next day come on to be hear before the Lord keeper who declare that  he be satisfy that the pound receive by the plaintiff be part of the eight  hundred fortythree pound thirteen shilling and sixpence remit by the king of  Denmark and although pierce have alter the property by take a bill for it  Payable to himself or bearer yet pierce be t apply it for the king of Denmark  use but money can be follow when invest in purchase of land Kender v Milward  post vol Hooper v eyles and all ibidem say vide rial v rial atk ub dict that  money that have be lie out in land have be follow in some case and the  plaintiff have make such provision as pierce shall have do ought not to be  charge therewith as so much of the estate of pierce he have account for the  same and it be order that all proceed at law shall be stay till further order  and there be a account decree touch some other money which plaintiff have  receive the judgement be order Vernon chancery case to stand a security for  what shall be find due from the plaintiff on the account but if nothing shall  appear to be due satisfaction be to be acknowledge on the judgement note upon  search the record of this case it appear that this cause be hear before the  Lord keeper on the that of November and such decree make as above but it do  not appear by the record that this cause have come on before Mr baron Atkins  the day before Reg lib b fol and see the advertisement prefix to the and vol  of these report whereby it appear from the register minutebook that this cause  do come on before Mr baron Atkins on the that of November and be then order to  stand for the Lord keeper judgement