case attorneygeneral at the relation of Pettifer versus rye and Warwick all  December Eq can ab pl S c tenant in tail devise land for maintenance of a  schoolmaster and other charitable purpose decree to be a good appointment  within the statute of charitable use though no fine be levy or recovery suffer  William Foxley tenant in tail by will devise the premise in question for the  maintenance of a schoolmaster and other charitable use the question be whether  a devise by tenant in tail who levy no fine nor suffer any recovery be a good  appointment within the statute of charitable use against the defendant who  claim under the entail the commissioner below have decree it to the charity  and upon exception now take to the decree it be confirm by the Lord keeper  without cost unless the defendant who be the heir at law of William Warwick  the nephew of the testator shall put the plaintiff to any further trouble and  in such case they be to pay cost Reg lib a fol who say he be of opinion that  the intent of the act of the queen for charitable use be to make the  disposition of the party as free and easy as his mind and not to oblige he to  the observance of any form or ceremony either of lease or release or common  recovery or fine c and cite the case of collison in Hobart where before the  statute of will a will of land make h devise the same for repair of highway be  adjudge to be good within the statute of the queen Elizabeth cap Geo cap  though make long after more the same case but there fail roll case Vernon  chancery case er p Vernon chancery case Griffith flood case in Hobart a devise  to jesus college be in mortmain and void at law yet allow good within the  statute of the queen damuss case more a feme covert administratrix devise to  charity and hold good Rivetts case more devise of a copyhold without a  surrender to the use of the will hold good and so in Reppington versus  Reppington and the town of Chaid and Opie Higgens for town of Southampton on  the will of one mill June a devise out of a manor hold in capite decree good  be to a charity although otherwise the will void as to a three part wile and  Windham who assist in that case say that the statute of the queen be a enable  act give power in any manner to dispose to charitable use in the case of sir  John Platt and saint John college in car a misnomer supply Chanc Rep so  attorneygeneral v Burdet post Tay v slaughter pre Ch so money conceal by wife  from the husband and dispose of to charity shall not be make good to the  husband so as to disappoint the charity Pilkington v Cuthbertson bro p c so  where testator settle land with power of revocation by write to be execute in  the presence of three witness deed of revocation be order to be prepare but  testator die before it can be execute have by will give the land to charitable  use hold a good appointment though no revocation piggot v Penrice pale yellow  Eq Rep though not the point then in question attorneygeneral v Sawtell atk so  though legacy lapse at law it shall subsist in equity for a charity attorney  general v Hickman W Kel so where bequest to executor to purchase land that  will be void by the statute of mortmain with a alternative or otherwise as  they shall be advice to provide for the charity hold the alternative may be  take for the charity Soresby v Hollins Mod and on the same principle Grimmet v  Grimmet Amb but a will of freehold land not execute accord to the statute of  fraud not good as a appointment to a charity attorneygeneral v banns and ux  pre Ch and note in that case there be a codicil duly execute for pass real  estate which recite the will but nevertheless so decree and no case have yet  be decide in which the court have execute a charitable purpose unless the will  contain a description of that which the law acknowledge to be a charitable  purpose or devote the property to the purpose of charity in general such dict  per Eldon Lord chancellor morris v the bishop of Durham Ves and the court be  cautious of extend the principle English v Orde Tr print in highmore on  mortmain p and court will sustain a bequest to a charity where otherwise it  will be void as exceed the limit allow by the law white v white Ves and on the  point of equity supply defective conveyance for a charity attorneygeneral v  Tancred Amb et vide duke on charitable use Vernon chancery case de term S  HILLARII in curian porter