bill against neal word speak of a justice of peace SC side action on the case  for that the defendant say of he be a justice of peace he be a fool a ass a  beetleheaded justice after verdict it be move in arrest of judgement that the  word be not actionable for they sound only in disability and not criminal but  on the other side it be say that the word be scandalous of he and import his  unfitness to be a justice of peace and be a cause to remove he from his office  and they cite I cro pead against Jones dunce of a lawyer and he will get  little by the law which be adjudge actionable and in the same book Cawdry  against high word speak of a physician he be a drunken fool a ass never be  scholar nor fit to speak to a scholar adjudge actionable and here those word  charge the plaintiff with indiscretion and render he incapable of the office  of a justice of peace but it be adjudge by foster chief justice Wyndham and  Twysden against mallet that those word be not actionable and cite crop Biscoe  against Hollis as a strong case than this and Hammond and Kingsmills case in  this court James where for say of a justice of peace he be a debauch man and  unfit to be a justice it be adjudge no action lie and justice Twysden say that  word which find in disability only be not actionable except they be speak of  one who gain his live by that thing profession wherein the word do disable he  mallet hold these word actionable be speak of a magistrate but all agree that  the defendant deserve to be bind to his good behaviour for his levinz  sauciness of a magistrate levinz er p whereupon the counsel of the plaintiff  move immediate that he may be bind to his good behaviour but thereto the court  answer that the court can not do it without a supplicavit first make and  before the supplicavit there ought to be a bill of the complaint file but  foster chief justice say that if any will sue to he for a warrant for the good  behaviour he will grant it but as to the action they give judgement for the  defendant