case bacon versus clark at the roll pre Charles Eq can ab pl pl one devise  land to his wife for life and after her death to his son in fee upon condition  to pay his daughter pound within a year after the death of I S with a proviso  that if the money be not pay the daughter may enter and receive the profit  till payment J S die live the wife the daughter shall have the pound during  the life of the mother and in default of payment equity will decree a sale of  the reversion one seize in fee of some land in possession and of other land in  reversion after the death of a and have a son and daughter devise the land  which he have in possession to his wife for life and from and after the death  of his wife and also after the death of the lessee for life of the other land  he devise these respective premise to his son and his heir upon condition that  the son shall within a year after the death of a three person one Elizabeth  Herne after who life it be say but not prove that the testator have other land  in reversion pay pound to the say testator daughter with a proviso that upon  nonpayment the daughter may enter upon the premise Elizabeth Herne die and a  year after her death the daughter peer William marry bring a bill for a sale  of this reversion in order to raise the pound portion and interest from the  end of the year after Elizabeth Herne death it be object for the defendant  that a sale of a reversion be hard in any case and the heir favour in law and  if the reversion shall be sell to pay this portion peer William er p and  interest it will destroy the provision for the son who as heir be more to be  favour than a daughter that though it be admit a devise of land to a heir upon  condition to pay do raise a trust in equity the condition be void at law in  regard none but the heir can take advantage thereof and it be a trust equity  will direct a sale or mortgage to raise the money yet in this case the will  bad prescribe and chalk out a remedy for the daughter recovery of her portion  videlicet by a entry upon the estate and that show the daughter be not to have  the portion until the estate be become capable of be enter upon namely when  the estate in reversion be fall into possession and the testator have  prescribe this remedy the daughter ought not to take any other beside it be  unreasonable that the son shall pay any thing until he have receive some  advantage by the will but on the other side it be answer and decree by the  court that a reversion be a estate and a beneficial one too and may as well as  any other estate be devise upon condition that if the mother or tenant for  life be dead and Elizabeth Herne be live it will be grant the daughter can not  recover the pound legacy though the son be by the peer William death of the  mother or of the tenant for life come into possession and if so to tie the  daughter down to stay till Elizabeth Herne be dead though the son be come into  possession and on the other hand not to let the daughter have it on the death  of Elizabeth Herne will be very unequal that by the express word of the will  the legacy be to be pay to the daughter within a year after the death of  Elizabeth Herne and as it be a portion and a daughter portion give her by her  own father it be to be favour that suppose it to be a hardship for the son to  pay it before such time as the estate give he by the will be come into  possession it may also be a hardship on the other hand for the daughter to  stay until after the death of the mother who may live as long as herself and  then it will not answer the end of the gift which be to prefer her in marriage  but that in truth this be not any hardship for the legacy will carry interest  from a year after the death of Elizabeth Herne which interest when compute by  a master will be make principal and carry interest vide ante butler v Duncombe  post brown v Barkham Creuze v hunter Ves jun and so it will be no more a  hardship upon the son to sell the reversion now than after the death of the  mother when the run on of interest will have increase the burden and by the  same reason the daughter must stay till both the life be drop that if the  hardship must be on one side or other the express direction of the testator  ought to take place and be pursue for which reason the master of the roll  decree the portion to be raise by sale unless the son shall pray it may be do  by mortgage peer William this decree be appeal from to Lord chancellor Parker  who affirm the same