case Rosewell versus Bennett April see Pym v Lockyer my Cr Kirk v Eddowes hare  b by his will give all his real and personal estate equal among his child and  at the conclusion of it direct his executor to lie out a sum not exceed pound  in put out the defendant his son apprentice b in his lifetime lie out pound in  put out the defendant clerk to a person in the navy office and die without  revoke his will evidence allow to be read of the testator declaration that  this advancement shall be a ademption of the legacy in the follow case  evidence of the intention be admit chapman v salt vern pile v pile Charles Rep  Shudal v Jekyll atk Biggleston v grub atk Mascal v Mascal Ves ellison v  Cookson bro Charles Rep bro Charles Rep SC in Jeacock v Falkner bro Charles  Rep Lord Thurlow say that evidence can not be read to prove what the testator  mean by the word use in his will but it may as to fact upon which the testator  make his will as to the general doctrine of satisfaction see Bellasis v  Uthwatt atk the defendant father by his will devise all his real and personal  estate equal among his child and in the conclusion of his will direct his  executor to la that out a sum not exceed pound in put out the defendant  apprentice the testator in his lifetime lie out pound in put out the defendant  clerk to a person in the navy office and die without revoke his will it be  insist for the plaintiff this must be consider as a ademption of the legacy  and offer to read evidence of the testator declaration to this purpose it be  oppose by the defendant counsel as be contrary to the statute of fraud and  perjury and that no weight ought to be lie upon it be parole declaration only  and beside the father suffer his will to stand unaltered be a favourable  circumstance for the defendant atkins Lord chancellor I be of opinion this  evidence ought to be read and shall judge of the weight of it afterward the  put out a son clerk in any of the office be as much a advancement as put he  apprentice to a trade and as this act of the testator after make his will be  not a revocation of the will but a ademption only of the defendant legacy I be  of opinion the plaintiff ought to be let into this evidence to show the  testator intention and it have be do in several case one before Lord king one  before sir Joseph Jekyll and another before I upon a appeal from a decree of  sir Thomas Abneys at the roll atkins er p