case hear against drayton a condition to deliver a bind to the plaintiff be  not satisfy by the delivery of it to a that ird erson to his use ante cro car  cro James Lut debt upon a obligation the condition be that if I S make a  obligation to the plaintiff before Michaelmas that then c the defendant plead  that I S make the obligation and seal and deliver it to another as his deed to  the use of the plaintiff and it be adjudge that it be no performance of the  condition for the meaning be that it shall he a good deed to the plaintiff and  perhaps the other will not deliver it to the plaintiff hare v celey mouth  Elizabeth er report date case hare and other against celey Hilary term  Elizabeth expose to half be no lease it be only a liberty to plough and sow  but passes no interest nor can the party have trespass for break the soil but  if the tenantin fee have expose it to half for several crop it have be a lease  post Goulds keb Leon cro James hob cro car sand Jones   light p will Bac ab  Bac ab trespass for break heir close call churchfield and meet and bind it the  jury find a special verdict that the place where be sixteen acre lie in a  field call Churchflela and meet it by other meet and bind that be mention in  the new assignment of which hare be seize in fee and to go to put out to the  other three to sow at half sure that he shall find one half of the seed and  the other three the other half and shall manure the land and that hare shall  have one moiety of the grain there grow when it be reap and the other the  other moiet and after the land be sow a enter by the command of the defendant  and spoil a great part of the corn upon which entry and spoil the action be  bring first matter if churchfield be find to be a great field in which diverse  man have interest if the sixteen acre in it m he calred churchfield and as to  this the kVCourt speak little second matter if this expose the land to half he  not a lease of the land so as the action be to he bring in the name of hare  and the three?Third admit it be a lease if hare he not tenant in common with  they of the corn for the moiety of that which be sow be his?The court hold it  no lease of the land but otherwise if it he for two or three crop and  therefore as to the break of the close hare only be to bring the action and as  to the spoil the corn they ought to join be tenant in common but in that they  join in the action for break the close whereas he ought to have bring it alone  it be adjudge the writ shall abate