a have a considerable jointure and a real estate of her own purchase and also  pound SouthSea stock convey part of the real estate to trustee to the use of  herself during her widowhood remainder to b her second son in tail remainder  over and covenant to transfer the SouthSea stock to trustee for herself during  her widowhood and afterward to her say second son but the stock be never  transfer a deliver these deed into her attorney hand with a charge not to part  with they and often declare she have do this for the sake of her child  afterward a marry the defendant king whereupon the second son bring a bill to  have these land and stock and mesne profit since the marriage and the deed to  be deliver to he a swear she never give notice to king of these write and king  swear that he have no notice of any of they before his marriage with her but  on the contrary that a before her marriage deliver to he a particular of her  estate wherein be comprise these premise and this pound SouthSea stock which  particular be prove to be a s hand write but not to be deliver to king before  the marriage Lord Chan king say as to a if she have keep these deed in her own  hand and they have be get from thence or out of the hand of her agent for her  agent hand be her hand he think she shall not be bind by they but there be  duplicate of these deed and evidence that she declare her intention to be to  put this out of her power he say he shall make no difficulty to decree against  her be she the survivor and the only defendant but as she be in possession and  visible owner it be hard to decree against king who have no notice of these  deed and that he incline to give no relief afterward upon the plaintiff pray  no decree against his mother or king but only as to the defendant who have the  deed that they may be deliver to he his lordship decree accord and that the  plaintiff may sue in the trustee name and the bill to be dismiss as to a the  mother and king without cost but without prejudice to any relief that king may  have on his bill Trin cotton and king will Rep the former decree be without  prejudice as to king he now prefer his bill against the several young child of  a by her former husband and also against a in order to set aside these  Settlements as be make without his privity and while she appear the visible  owner of the estate and thereby induce he to marry her all which Settlements  be make by a in trust for herself until her second marriage and afterward for  her young child respective but it be now prove that these voluntary  Settlements be make by the lady before her marriage treaty with king be equity  case abridge er p begin and in a public manner that she herself desire they  may be public that she make a entertainment for several of her tenant whereat  be present she acquaint they her young son b be to be their landlord in case  she marry again and if she marry her second husband shall marry her for love  and it appear that she have reserve to herself out of these Settlements her  original jointure make by her former husband be pound per Ann rentcharge that  she have nine young child by her former husband who at best be very slender  provide for and further that king when he marry her be in very mean  circumstance a halfpay lieutenant in Ireland have two son by a former wife and  that he have a considerable sum of money with this lady as she have be  executrix and residuary legatee of her former husband so that it be evident  there have be no fraud or imposition on king who do not so much as pretend he  can make any settlement or jointure on his lady for these reason Lord Chan  king dismiss plaintiff bill as to that part of it which seek to set aside any  of the Settlements make by the wife in trust for her young child and as to the  SouthSea stock though there be no actual assignment by deed but only a  covenant to transfer yet this be such a assignment as will bind king for it be  not like a bind from her to pay money since here king be to pay none nor to  part with any thing which be his it be only a provision make by her before her  marriage treaty with the plaintiff that in case of her marriage such a part of  her estate shall go to her child which be but reasonable and yet contrary to  this provision make for the child king himself have sell this stock and  receive the money beside a far sum of pound SouthSea stock which his wife have  not assign that here the young child have the law on their side and have  recover damage in a action of covenant which benefit his lordship say he can  not take from they note they recover not only the value of the stock but also  all the dividend since the second marriage Trin king and cotton will Rep a pl  a there be a mistake in the number of the page of will Rep for page shall be  page it have be hold that the consideration for the precedent limitation in a  marriage settlement have be apply even to the subsequent one as where in  consideration of a marriage and portion land have be settle on the husband for  life and then to the wife for life remainder to the child with remainder to a  brother these consideration equity case abridge have extend to the brother and  the reason be because it may be very well intend that the husband or his  parent will not have come into this settlement unless all the party thereto  have agree to the limitation to the brother per Lord Macclesfield vide Edward  v countess of Warwick will Rep see the case of Osgood and stride Eq can Abr p  c