case rud against tucker the attornment and surrender of one jointtenant for  life to the reversioner in fee shall bind his companion and settle the  reversion in the grantee ante     light the case be now move again and all the  justice except Clench resolve for the defendant that the attornment by one  jointtenant be good and shall settle the reversion in the grantee and be as  well as if both have attorned gawdy say there be not any difference betwixt  the case of a attornment upon grant of a signiory as Littleton be and the rant  of a reversion forboth be entire or if a reversion of land he grant which the  one joint hold it be void because there be not any such reversion as Edward  title grant S but if he grant the reversion of the moiety of the one that be  good by such express word and the case of Henry dyer put by Baldwin be all one  with this case where a reversion be grant to the one jointtenant and he accept  the deed it be good and there be not any difference hetween a express  attornment and a attornment in law and the attornment shall bind all for that  they he seize per my et per tout and a attornment do not pass any interest but  a assent only which ought to be upon true notice of the grant and then his  attornment to part of the grant be good for the whole and a attornment ought  to be good for all or void for all Fenner agree with he in onnibus and say  that the reason why one jointtenant in a who To give back To give back quid  law danat or a per quce the condition of a slave shall not he compel to attorn  be because it shall he accord to the grant of the record and accord to that  which the plaintiff demand and that it may not he variant from it and a  attornment be a lawful act and be not any prejudice to his companion and  therefore shall bind he and if he in reversion have seize the two jointtenants  and make a feoff and the one have reenter there be no doubt but that it have  be a attornment for both in law and have settle the estate for life in both  and the reversion in the grantee much strong a express attornment shall do it  croak Elizabeth Popham accord and say that to examine the reason hereof be to  examine what act of the one jointtenant shall bind his companion and what  shall he avoidable by the other it be clear that every act by the one  jointtenant for the benefit croak Elizabeth er p of his companion shall bind  but those act which prejudice his companion in estate shall not bind as the  default of the one the surrender of the one c and there before if two  jointtenants have the benefit of a condition to increase their estate and the  one will attorn in a quid law proclaim without save it it shall not hurt his  companion but himself only but in the matter of the profit of the land the one  may damnify the other for there be quasi a privity betwixt they and it be his  folly to join with one who will prejudice he as where the one take the entire  profit the other have not any remedv so where two jointtenants he of a  signiory and a wardship happen if one ill distrain for the service before  election of the ware ship it shall bind his companion and here this be but a  consent which be griven by the one shall bind the other by reason of the  privity of their estate but if the attornment have not be good the surrender  have not help the case for that can he unless there have be a attornment  before which if it be not a good attornment to vest the reversion he can  accept of a surrender wherefore it be adjudge for the defendant by Ann c all  grant and conveyance of any manor or rend or of the reversion or remainder of  any message or land shall be good without attornment   light see also Geo c