case tempt Hardwicke more versus the mayor OF hastings a reasonable fine may  mean a certain one ante p sergeant Parker now move in arrest of judgement his  exception be that there be not a sufficient title show in the suggestion of  the writ to entitle he to this franchise for it do not show how or by who the  fine be to be assess nor any way to ascertain it the writ suggest a custom  that the old son of every freeman be bear within the port bath a right in  respect thereof upon payment of a reasonable fine to be admit a freeman and  then the writ go on that the say m ought by you to be admit and swear into the  office of one of the freeman of the say port but you refuse c though the say m  have tender to you a reasonable fine in uncertain fine for copyhold there be  some measure for the fine to be settle by videlicet the value of the land and  yet when it be lie in plead that a reasonable fine be due it be likewise lie  that it be to be assess by the lord or his steward so in   Ent b and if  necessary there be much more in this case case tempt Hardwicke er p if upon  the award a peremptory mandamus the person shall tender only d as a reasonable  fine how can the corporation show this to excuse themselves from a attachment  upon that mandamus Lacy with he though the writ de rational part be general as  in f n b b and the register b yet the count upon those writ be all particular  as in   Ent b Rastals entry b Herne pleader in the same manner this writ which  be a declaration shall have be that S d be a reasonable fine strange  solicitorgeneral contra as to the peremptory mandamus if they refuse to admit  we upon that mandamus they will certain be at liberty to show we do not tender  a reasonable fine when we come for a attachment Lord Hardwicke c j there be no  reason in this case to arrest the judgement the objection be find upon the  same reason as that make at the trial and which be overrule and if the  objection be a good objection we must take the word pound reasonable to mean  necessary uncertain whereas we have resolve that a reasonable fine may mean a  certain fine but I think further that if the defendant will have take  advantage of it they shall have return that he do not tender a reasonable fine  but what justify we in this case tempt Hardwicke case be that I think this be  a immaterial part of the writ and that there be no occasion for the party to  say any thing of the fine at all for when he set out his right and pray a  mandamus to be admit he must take care to do what else be necessary there be a  precedent in Tremains entry which be general only set forth his right and pray  general to be admit of the livery of the vintner company and the defendant in  their return set forth that a fine be to be pay and no objection be make to  the writ see t r and the case there cite judgement for plaintiff this case be  cite kid on corporation as a authority for the position that where the writ  suggest that every person be the son of a freeman and bear after his father  have be swear have a right to be admit a freeman on pay a reasonable fine and  that this be hold sufficient without show in what manner or by who the fine be  to be assess case tempt Hardwicke easter term geo two b r Philip Lord  Hardwicke Lord chief Lord Hardwicke be Lord chancellor as well as chief  justice come into the court of b r that April take the oath and hear Mr  solicitor strange motion stram that the office of Lord chancellor and Lord  chief justice be always hold tenable together by the same person see dugd  Chron sir side die cro car fortesc Rep see the case above refer to in dyer  where it be observe by the several writer that knevit be chancellor and chief  justice together in the time of e III   a so be Lord Hardwicke for which the  above memorandum be cite and Lord Loughbourough late and Noel be chief justice  of Chester as well as a judge of Westminster hall but where two office be  incompatible acceptance of the second vacates the first t r Doug n t r justice  sir Francis page Knt sir Edmund probin Knt William lee Esq justice John will  Esq attorneygeneral John strange Esq solicitorgeneral