a explanation what manner of person those shall be that be to execute the  power or ordinance of the king prerogative that absolute prerogative accord to  the king pleasure reveal by his law may be exercise and execute by any subject  to who power may be give by the king in any place of judgement or Commission  which the king by his law have ordain in which the judge subordinate can wrong  the people the law sying down a measure by which every judge shall govern and  execute against which law if any judge proceed he be by the law questionable  and punishable for his transgression in this nature be all the judge and  commissioner of the land no otherwise then in their court in which the king in  person be suppose to sit who can make that trespass felony or treason which  the law have not make so to be neither can punish the guilty by other  punishment then the law have appoint this prerogative or power as it be over  all the subject so be know by the subject they be without excuse if they  offend and suffer no wrong if they be just punish and by this Prerogaive the  king govern all sort of people accord to make one know will the absolute  prerogative which be in king accord to their private will and judgement can be  execute by any subject neither be it possible to give such power by Commission  or fit to subject the people to the same for the king in that he be the  substitute of God immediate the father of his people and head of the common  wealth have by perticipation with God and with his subject a discretion  judgement and feel love towards those over who he reign only proper to himself  or to his place and person who see he can in any other infuse his wisdom power  or guifs which God in respect of his place and charge have enable he withal  can neither subordinate any other judge to govern by that knowledge which the  king can no otherwise then by his know will perticipate unto he and if any  such subordinate judge shall obtain Commission accord to the discretion of  such judge to govern the people that judge be bind to think that to be his  sound discretion which the law in which the king know will show unto he to be  that justice which he ought to administer otherwise he may seem to esteem  himself above the king law who wiil not govern by he or to have a power derive  from other then from the king which in the kingdom will administer justice  contrary unto the justice of the land neither can such a judge or commissioner  under the name of his authority shroud his own high affection see the  conscience and discretion of every man be particular and private to himself as  the discretion of the judge can be proper or possible the discretion of the  conscience of the king and if no his discretion neither the judgement that be  rule by another man only therefore it may seem they rather desire to be king  then to rule the people under the king which will not administer justice by  law but by their own will this administration in a subject be derogative to  the king prerogative for he administer justice out of a private direction be  not capable of a general direction how to use the king child in pleasure in  cause of particular respect which if no other thn the king himself can do how  can it be so that any man shall desire that which be unfit and impossible but  that it must proceed out of some exorbitan affection the rather see such place  to be full of trouble and be altogether unnecessary no man will seek to thrust  himself into it but for hope of gain then be not any prerogative oppugn but  maintain though it be desire that every subordinate magistrate may not be make  supreme whereby he may seal up the heart of the people take from the king the  respect due unto he only or to judge the people otherwise then the king do  himself and although the prince be not bind to render any account to the law  which in person administer it self yet every subordinate judge must render a  account to the king by his law how he have administer justice in his place  where he be set but if he have power to rule by private direction for which  there be no law how can he be question by a law if in his private censure he  offend therefore it seem that in give such authority the king ordain not  subordinate magistrate but absolute king and what do the king leave to himself  who give so much to other as he have himself nei her be there a great bind to  tie the subject to his prince in particular then when he shall have recourse  unto he in his person or in his power for relief of the wrong which from  private man be offer or for reformation of the oppression of any subordinate  magistrate shall impose upon the people there can be no offence in the judge  who have power to execute accord to his discretion when the discretion of any  judge shall be think fit to be limit and therefore there can be therein no  reformation whereby the king in this use no prerogative to gain his subject  right then the subject be bind to suffer helpless wrong and the disconent of  the people be cast upon the king he law be neglect which with their equity in  all oher cause and judgement save this interpose themselves and yield remedy  and to conclude custom can confirm that which be any way unreasonable of it  self wisdom will not allow that which be many way dangerous and no way  profitable justice will not approve that government where it can be but wrong  must be commit neither can there be any rule by which to try it nor mean of  reformation of it therefore whosoever desire government must seek such as he  be capable of not such as seem to himself most easy to execute for it be  apparent that it be easy to he that know not law nor justice to rule as he  listen his will never want a power to it self but it be safe and blameless  both for the judge and people and honour to the king that judge be appoint who  know the law and that they be limit to govern accord to the law