cap LXII of indictment concern indictment we have speak somewhat in the first  part of the institute sect and you may read in my report many resolution  concern indictment videlicet lib foe c lib foe livre foe livre foe livre foe  we will add one point adjudge in the case between burgh and Holcroft before  mention in the chapter of appeal which be that where it be provide by the  statute de Artic super Cartas cap en case de mort deal home deins Le verge on  office deal coroner appent as view inquest de Ceo fair soit man all coroner  deal pais and emsemblement sheep Le coroner deal hostel roy face loffice and  appent c and in that case one man be coroner both of the king house and of the  county the indictment of manslaughter be take before he as coroner both of the  king house and of the county and it be adjudge that the indictment be good  because the mischief express in the statute be remedy as well when both office  be in one person as when they be in diverse and therefore in this case the  rule do hold when two jura to run together in One mask level ground be ac si  be in to visit Richard Weston yeoman late servant of sir gervase Elwys  lieutenant of the tower and under the lieutenant keeper of sir Thomas Overbury  then prisoner in the tower be indict for that he the say Richard the day of  may a James king in the tower of London give to the say sir though Overbury  poison call Roseacre in broth which he the say sir Thomas receive et ut idem  Richard Weston praesatum though Overbury to greater extent quickly  to put out of the way murdraret June year  James king say in addition to give  to he another poison call white arsenic c that Julii a suprad give to he a  poison call Mercury raise in tart ut predict though Overbury to greater extent  quickly to put out of the way murdraret and that a person unknown in the  presence of the say Richard Welson and by his commandment and procurement the  of septemb year  say in addition to give to the say sir Thomas a glister mix  with poison call Mercury sublimate ut prediction thomam to greater extent  quickly to put out of the way murdraret et prediction Thomas Overbury de  seperalibus poison prediction et surgical operation ind a prediction  separalibus time c violently to be faint usque and diem septemb year   say in addition to quo die speech Thomas de prediction seperalibus poison  to go to poison c and albeit it do notappear of which of the say poison he die  yet it be resolve by all the judge of the king bench that the indictment be  good for the substance of the indictment be whether he be poison or no and  upon the evidence it appear that Weston within the time aforesaid have give  unto sir Thomas Overbury diverse other poison as namely the powder of diamond  cantharides lapis Causticus and powder of spider and water fortis in a glister  and it be resolve by all the say judge that albeit these say poison be not  contain in the indictment yet the evidence of give of they be sufficient to  maintain the indictment for the substance of the indictment be as before be  say whether he be poison or no but when the cause of the murder be lie in the  indictment to be by poison no evidence can be give of another cause as by  weapon burn drown or other cause because they be distinct several cause but if  the murder be lie by one kind of weapon as by a sword either dagger Styletto  or other like weapon be sufficient evidence because they be all under one  classis or cause and afterward Ann turner sir gervase Helwys and Richard  franklyn a physician purveyor of the poison be indict as accessary before the  fact do and it be resolve by all the say judge that either the proof of the  poison contain in the indictment or of any other poison be sufficient to prove  they accessary for the substance of the indictment of they as accessary be  whether they do procure Weston to poison sir Thomas Overbury and because that  not only whether   turner and Richard franklyn but some of the degree of  nobility be indict as accessary in another county videlicet in the county of  Mid diverse notable point be resolve upon the statute of e first if the  accessary be in the county of Mid where the king bench be and the principal do  the felony c in another county that the court of the king bench be within the  word of that Act videlicet and that the justice of gaol delivery or oier and  terminer or two of they c for the cause and reason give in the lord Zanchers  case lib foe c second if the indictment be take in the king bench then the  justice shall not write in their own name because placita are in person king  three diverse precedent be show where the accessary be in the county of Mid  where the king bench sit and the principal be attaint in another county that  the justice of the king bench have remove the record of the attainder of the  principal before they by certiorari so it be do in the lord Zanchers case  where above the like precedent be show in a case where the principal be  attaint in the county of Dorn and the accessary be in Mid and the king bench  sit there the justice of the same court remove the attainder before they by  certiorari fourthly it be resolve that the lord steward of England who be a  judge in case of high treason or felony commit by any of the peer of the realm  be within these word justice of Gaol-de livery or oier and terminer because he  be a justice of oier and terminer for his authority be by Commission and the  word of his Commission be after diverse recital et superinde audiend examinand  to answer compellend without debit terminand so as he have power to hear and  determine and where the word be or any two of they that be to be intend where  there be two or more justice and yet where there be but one it extend to he as  the statute of Merton cap power be give to the sheriff in case of redisseisin  the word be assumpsit recum Coronatoribus to please coronae c in the plural  number and yet where there be but one coroner in the county the statute extend  thereunto and the sheriff shall take that one also the word of the statute be  further that then the justice of gaol delivery or of oier and terminer or  other there authorize within which word or other there authorize the lord  steward be include five if the record of the attainder be by Writ of  certiorari remove out of London into the king bench then there arise another  doubt upon the say statute if afterward any proceed shall be have against any  Peer for that the word of the statute be the justice c shall write to the  custos rotulorum or keeper of the record where such principal shall hereafter  be attaint and the attainder in this case be in London and the king bench be  in Middlesex so as if the record shall be remove into the king bench in  Middlesex the record shall not be where the attainder be have and consequent  the lord steward can not write to the king bench and therefore to prevent all  question it be resolve that in this case of the lord steward no certiorari  shall be grant but a special Writ shall be direct accord to the word of the  say Act to the commissioner of oier and terminer in London to certify whether  the principal be convict or acquit and they make a particular certificate  accord so as the record of the attainder of the principal do notwithstanding  that certificate remain with the commissioner of oier and terminer in London  so as if any further proceed shall be have the lord steward may write to they  as after he do in the case of r earl of S and f his wife and it be to be  observe that the ancient wall of London a mentionwhereof do yet remain extend  through the tower of London and all that which be on the west part of the wall  be within the city of London videlicet in the parish of all-saints bark in the  ward of the tower of London and all that be on the east part of the wall be in  the county of Middlesex and the Chamber of sir Thomas Overbury be within the  tower on the west part of the say wall and therefore Weston be try within the  city of London and where it be often say in many aActs of parliament bRecords  and cBook case that the king can put any man to answer but he must be apprise  by indictment presentment or other matter of record true it be in plea of the  crown or other common offence nuisance c principal concern other or the public  there the king by law must be apprise by indictment presentment or other  matter of record but the king may have a action for such wrong as be do to  himself and whereof none other can have any action but the king without be  apprise by indictment presentment or other matter of record as a dQuare hinder  eQuare incumbravit a Writ of fAttaint gof debt hDetinue of ward iEscheat  kScire fac pur repealer patent c