non hinder clause detractor quo minus ab by the same route potestate res  to take apart a who to put act which be in their nature revocable can by  strength of word be fix or perpetuate yet man have put in ure two mean to bind  themselves from change or dissolve that which they have let down whereof one  be clause detractor the other insertion oath whereof the former be only  pertinent to this present purpose this clause detractor be by the common  practical term call clause non to stand before de futuroesse the one weaken  and disannul any matter pass to the contrary the other any matter to come and  this latter be that only whereof we speak the clause de non to stand before de  going to be the law judge to be idle and of no force because it do deprive man  of that which of all other thing be most incident to humane condition and that  be alteration or repentance therefore if I make my will and in the end thereof  do add such like clause also my will be if I shall revoke this present will or  declare any new will except the same shall be in write subscribe with the hand  of two witness that such revocation or new declaration shall be utter void and  by these present I do declare the same not to be my will but this my former  will to stand any such pretend will to the contrary notwithstanding yet  nevertheless this clause or any the like never so exact pen and although it do  restrain the revocation but in circumstance and not altogether be of no force  or efficacy to fortify the former will against the second but I may by parole  without write repeal the same will and make a new so if there be a statute  make that no sheriff shall continue in his office above a year and if any  patent be make to the contrary it shall be void and if there be any clause de  non to stand before contain in such patent to dispense with this present act  that such clause also shall be void yet nevertheless a patent of the sheriff  office make by the king with a non to stand before will be good in law  contrary to such statute which pretend to exclude non to stand before and the  reason be because it be a inseparable prerogative of the crown to dispense  with politic statute and of that kind and then the derogatory clause hurt not  Perk d cap maxim Edward cap Edward cap h so if a act of parliament be make  wherein there be a clause contain that it shall not be lawful for the king by  authority of parliament during the space of seven year to repeal and determine  the same act this be avoid clause and such act may be repeal within the seven  year and yet if the parliament shall enact in the nature of the ancient law  regius that there shall be no more parliament hold but that the king shall  have the authority of the parliament this act be good in law because potestas  funeral rites  he himself to take apart to be able to send with a commission  non to be able for as it be in the power of a man to kill a man but it be not  in his power to save he alive and to restrain he from breathe or feel so it be  in the power of a parliament to extinguish or transfer their own authority but  not while the authority remain entire to restrain the function and exercise of  the same authority so in the of king h chap there be a statute make that all  act that pass in the minority of king reckon the same under the year of may be  annul and revoke by their letter patent when they come to the same year but  this act in the first of king Edward who be then between the year of can be  repeal and a new law surrogate in place thereof wherein a more reasonable  liberty be give and wherein though other law be make revocable accord to the  provision of the former law with some new from prescribe yet that very law of  revocation together with pardon be make irrevocable and perpetual so that  there be a direct contrariety between these two law for if the former stand  which make all latter law during the minority of king revocable without  exception of any law whatsoever then that very law of repeal be conclude in  the generality and so it self make revocable on the other side that law make  no doubt of the absolute repeal of the first law though it self be make during  the minority which be the very case of the former law in the new provision  which it make have a precise exception that the law of repeal shall not be  repeal but the law be that the first law by the impertinency of it be void ab  beginning Self facto without repeal as if a law be make that no new statute  shall be make during year and the same statute be repeal within the year if  the first statute shall be good then the repeal can not be make thereof within  that time for the law of repeal be a new law and that be disable by the former  law therefore it be void in it self and the rule hold continuous law be no one  law human affairs  as positinam continuous be clause and repeal of a law  to shut out beginning non male neither be the difference of the civil law so  Elizabeth die p c reasonable as colourable for they distinguish and say that a  derogatory clause be good to disable any latter act except you revoke the same  clause before you proceed to establish any late if S position or declaration  for they say that clause detractor and alias to follow will situation in will  videlicet si testator dedicate qd si to touch the dawn to make other will non  vult ibud to be strong service quoth following layout ab self clause reguletur  per subsequent quoth following layout to be hard without will such quoth non  sit to stretch toward the sense be that where a former will be make and after  a late will the reason why without a express revocation of the former will it  be by implication revoke be because of the repugnancy between the disposition  of the former and the late but where there be such a derogatory clause there  can be gather no such repugnancy because it seem that the testator have a  purpose at the make of the first will to make some show of a new will which  nevertheless his intention be shall not take place but this be answer before  for if that clause be allow to be good until a revocation then will no  revocation at all be make therefore it must needs be void by operation of law  at first thus much of clause detractor