section descent part also it be say that if a man be seize of land in fee by  occupation in time of war and thereof die seize in the time of war and the  tenement descend to his heir such dissent shall not oust any man of his entry  and of this a man may see in a plea upon a Writ of aiel e by occupation in  time of war first it be necessary to be know what shall be say time of peace  time peace and what shall be say time pretty sive war time of war time peace  be quan do cancellar other curiae king are area free from obstacles who law   of facio whoever prout fieri to become used and so it be adjudge in the case  of Roger Mortimer and of Thomas earl of Lancaster utrum land sit guerrina  or not naturally debet to fine per think over king et the dawn who senate king  per law terrae to watch to steer say non elsewhere modus and therefore when  the court of Justce be open and the judge and minister of the same may by law  protect man from wrong and violence and distribute justice to all it be say to  be time of peace so when by invasion insurrection rebellion or such like the  peaceable course of justice be disturb and stop so as the court of justice be  as it be shut up et silent law inter arms  then it be say to be time of war  and the trial hereof be by the record and judge of the court of justice for by  they it will appear whether justice have her equal course of proceed at that  time or no and this shall not be try by jury if a man be seize in time of  peace and dissent be cast in time of war this shall not take away the entry of  the disseisee item tempore peace quoth to say and difference the dawn who  to be tempore pretty quoth idem be quoth tempore guerrino quoth nothing full a  tempore law in an unjust manner be for time in an unjust manner come to be  a pressing down forcible who to seek again non to be able disseisinae unequal  so as hereby it also appear that time of peace be the time of law and right  and time of war be the time of violent oppression which can be resist by the  equal course of law and therefore in all real action the to fill up or take of  the profit be lie tempore peace for if they be take tempore pretty they be not  account of in law by occupation occupation be a word of be and signify a put  out of a man freehold in time of war and it be all one with a seize in time of  peace save that it be not so dangerous as it appear have by Littleton and  therefore the law give a writ in that case of to take into possession so call  by reason of that word in the Writ in stead of disseisivit in the assize of  novel dissesin if the dessesin have be do in time of peace whereby it appear  how apt both in this and in all other place Littleton through his whole book  speak but albeit occupatio whereof Littleton here speak be use only in the say  Writ and in none other that I can find or remember yet have it be use common  in conveyance and lease to limit or make certain precedent word and tunc in  tenure occupation but occupaitio be apply to the possession be it lawful or on  unlawful it have also creep into some act of parliament as h cap Elizabeth cap  and other and to take into possession be sometime take to conquer and of this  a man see in a plea upon a Writ of aiel year e hereby it appear that ancient  term or year after the example of Littleton be to be cite and vouch for  confirmation of the law albeit they be never print and that of those year  those especial of e h c be worthy of the read and observation a great number  of which I have see and observe which in I opinion do give a great light not  only to the understanding and reason of the commonlaw which Fitzherbert either  see not or be by he omit but also to the true exposition of the ancient  statute make in those time yet I advice be that they be read in their time for  after our student be enable and arm to set on our yearbook or report of the  law let he read first the latter report for two cause first for that for the  most part the latter judgement and resolution be the sure and therefore it be  the best to season he with they in the beginning both for the settle of his  judgement and for the retain of they in memory second for that the latter be  more facile and easy to be understand than the more ancient but after the read  of they then to read these other before mention and all the ancient author  that have write of our law for I will wish our student to be a complete lawyer  but now to return as it be in case of dissent so it be in case of presentation  for no usurpation in time of war put the right patron out of possession albeit  the incumbent come in by institution and induction and time of war do not only  give privilege to they that be in war but to all other within the kingdom and  although the admission and institution be in time of peace yet if the  presentment be in time of war it put not the right patron out of possission