section feesimple and also where a man be seize of land in feesimple have  issue a son and daughter by one venture and a son by another venture and die  and the old son enter and die without issue the daughter shall have the land  not the young son yet the young son be heir to the father but not to his  brother but if the elder son do not enter into the land after the death of his  father but die before any entry make by he then the young brother may enter  shall have the land as heir to his father but where the elder son in the case  aforesaid enter after the death of his father have possession there the sister  shall have the land because possession brother de fee simple compose sister be  to hang but if there be brother by diverse venture and the elder be seize of  land in fee die without issue his uncle enter as next heir to he who also die  without issue now the young brother may have the land as heir to the uncle for  that he be of the whole blood to he albeit he be but of the half blood to his  elder brother seize of land in feesimple these word exclude a seize in fee  tail albeit he have a feesimple expectant f and therefore if land be give to a  man and his wife and to the heir of their two body the remainder to the heir  of the husband and they have issue a son and the wife die and he take another  wife and have issue a son the father die the old son enter and die without  issue the second brother of the half blood shall inherit because the old son  by his entry be not actual seize of the feesimple be expectant but only of the  estate tail and the rule be that possession brother de fee simple compose  sister be to hang and here the old son be not possess of the feesimple but of  the estate tail and where Littleton speak only of land g yet there shall be  possession brother of a use of a signiory a rend a advowson and of other  hereditament and the old son enter h these word be material add when the  father die seize of land in feesimple for if the old son do not in that case  enter then without question the young son shall be heir because as it have be  say before regular he must make himself heir to he that be last actual seize  or to the purchaser and that be to the father where the old son do not enter  and therefore Littleton add that the son be heir to the father I but when the  old son in this case do enter then can the young son be of the half blood be  heir to the old but the land shalldescend to the sister of the whole blood yet  in many case albeit the son do not enter into land descend in feesimple the  sister of the whole blood shall inherit in some case where the old son do  enter yet the young brother of the half blood shall be heir k if the father  make a lease for year the lessee enter die the old son die during the term  before entry or receipt of rend the young son of the half blood shall not  inherit but the sister because the possession of the lessee for year be the  possession of the old son so as he be actual seize of the feesimple and  consequent the sister of the whole blood be to be heir the same law it be if  the land be hold by knight service and the old son be within age and the  guardian enter into the land and so it be if the guardian in socage enter but  in the case aforesaid if the father make a lease for life or a gift in tail  and die and the old son die in the life of tenant for life or tenant in tail  the young brother of the half blood shall inherit because the tenant for life  or tenant in tail be seize of the freehold and the old son have nothing but  reversion expectant upon that freehold or estate tail and therefore the young  son shall inherit the land as heir to his father who be last seize of the  actual freehold and albeit a rend have be reserve upon the lease for life and  the old son have receive the rend and die yet it be hold by some that the  young brother shall inherit because the seize of the rend be no actual seize  of the freehold of the land but ass pl seem to the contrary because the rend  issue out of the land and be in lieu thereof wherein the only question be  whether such a seize of the rend be such a actual seize of the land in the old  son as the sister may in a Writ of right make herself heir of this land to her  brother but it be clear that l if there be a bastard eigne and mulier puisne  and the father make a lease for life or a gift in tail be reserve a rend and  die and the bastard receive the rend and die this shall bar the mulier for the  reason of that stand upon another maxim as shall manifest appear in his apt  place sect seize of land m but in this case if the old son do enter and get a  actual possession of the feesimple yet if the wife of the father be endow of  the three part and the old son die the young brother shall have the reversion  of this three part notwithstanding the elder brother entry because that his  actual seize which he get thereby be by the endowment defeat but if the old  son have make a lease for life and the lessee have endow the wife of the  father and tenant in dower have die the daughter shall have have the reversion  because the reversion be change and alter by the lease for life and the  reversion be now expectant on a new estate for life enter hereupon the  question grow whether if the father be seize of diverse several parcel of land  in one county and after the death of the father the son enter into one parcel  general and before any actual entry into the other die this general entry into  part shall vest in he a actual seize in the whole so as the sister shall  inherit the whole and this be a quaere in Henry a and some do take a diversity  when a entry shall vest or divest a estate that there must be several entry  into the several parcel but where the possession be in no man but the freehold  in law be in the heir that enter there the general entry into one part reduce  all into his actual possession and therefore if the lord enter into a parcel  general for a mortmain or the feoff for a condition break or the disseisee  into parcel general the entry shall not vest nor divest in these or like case  but for that parcel but when a man die seize of diverse parcel in possession  and the freehold in law be by a law cast upon the heir and the possession in  no man there the entry into parcel general seem to vest the actual possession  in he in the whole but if his entry in that case be special videlicet that he  enter only into that parcel and into no more there it reduce that parcel only  into actual possession man be seize of land what then be the law of a rend  advowson or such thing that lie in grant g if a rend or a advowson do descend  to the old son and he die before he have seize of the rend or present to the  church the rend or advowson shall descend to the young son for that he must  makehimselfe heir to his father as have be oftentimes say before the like law  be of office court liberty franchise Commons of inheritance and such like h  and this case differ from the case of the tenant by the courtesy for there if  the wife die before the rend day or that the church become void because there  be no laches or default in he nor possibility to get seize the law in respect  of the issue beget by he will give he a estate by the courtesy of England but  the case of the descent to the young son stand upon another reason videlicet  to make himself heir to he that be last actual seize as have be say in  feesimple I for half blood be not respect in estate in tail because that the  issue do claim in by descent per form gift and the issue in tail be ever of  the whole blood to the donee k possession brother de fee simple compose sister  be to hang hereupon four thing be to be observe every word almost be operative  and material first that the brother must be inactuall possession for  possession be quasi foot attitude second de fee simple exclude estate in tail  three compose sister be to hang so as l sister be haeres fanctam and therefore  some act must be do to make her heir and the young son be haeres born m if no  act be do to the contrary and albeit the word be compose sister be to hang yet  this do extend to the issue of the sister c who shall inherit before the young  brother fourthly of dignity whereof no other possession can be have but such  as descend as to be a duke marquis earl viscount or baron to a man and his  heir there can be no possession of the brother to make the sister to inherit  but the young brother be heir as Littleton say to the father shall inherit the  dignity inherent to the blood as heir to he that be first create noble and you  shall understand that concern descent there be a law parcel of the law of  England call Jus coronae and differ in many thing from the general law concern  the subject as for example the king in any suit for any thing that pertain to  the crown shall not show in certain his cosinage as a subject shall do or as  be himself shall do for thing touch his duchy n and in the case of the king if  he have issue a son and a daughter by one venture and a son by another venture  and purchase land and die and the old son enter and die without issue the  daughter shall not inherit these land not any other feesimple land of the  crown but the young brother shall have they wherein note that neither  possession brother do hold of land of the possession of the crown nor half  blood be no impediment to the descent of the land of the crown as it fall out  in experience after the decease of king Edward the six to the queen marry and  from queen marry to queen Elizabeth both which here be of the half blood and  yet inherit not only the land which king Edward or queen marry purchase but  the ancient land parcel of the crown also a man that be king by descent of the  part of his mother purchase land to he and his heir and die without issue this  land shall descend to the heir of the part of the mother but in the case of a  subject the heir of the part of the father shall have they so king Henry the  eight purchase land to he and his heir and die have issue two daughter the  lady marry and the lady Elizabeth after the decease of king Edward the old  daughter queen marry do inherit only all his land in feesimple for the old  daughter or sister of a king shall inherit all his feesimple land so it be if  the king purchase land of the custom of gavelkind and die have issue diverse  son the old son shall only inherit these land and the reason of all these case  be for that the quality of the person do in these andmany other like case  alter the descent so as all the land and possession whereof the king be seize  in jure coronae shall secundum law coronae attend upon and follow the crown  and therefore to whosoever the crown descend those land and possession descend  also for the crown and the land whereof the king be seize in jure coronae be  concomitant if the right heir of the crown be attain of treason yet shall the  crown descend to he and eastern instant without any other reversal the  attainder be utter avoid as it fall out in the case of Henry the seven oh and  if the king purchase land to he and his heir he be seize thereof in jure  coronae e strong when he purchase land to he his heir and successor but hereof  this little taste shall suffice