the maxim OF the law in jure non to move back cause say neighbor to look on it  be infinite for the law to judge the cause of cause and their impulsions one  of another therefore it content it self with the immediate cause and judge of  act by that without look to any further degree as if a annuity be grant pro  council expense impendend and the grantee commit treason whereby he be  imprison so that the grantor can have access unto he for his counsel yet  nevertheless the annuity be not determine by this maxim I oh h Dys non  feasance yet it be the grantee act and default to commit the treason whereby  the imprisonment grow but the law look not so far but excuse he because the  not give counsel be compulsory and not voluntary in regard of the imprisonment  so if a parson make a lease and be deprive or resign the successor shall avoid  the lease and yet the cause of deprivation and more strong of a resignation  move from the party himself but the law regard not that because the admission  of the new incombent be the act of the ordinary so if I be seize of a advowson  in gross and a usurpation be have against I and at the next avoidance I usurp  arear I shall be remit and yet the presentation which be the act remote be I  own act but the admission of my clerk whereby the inheritance be reduce to I  be the act of the ordinary so if I covenant with I S a stranger in  consideration of natural love to my son to stand seize to the use of the say I  S to the intent he shall feoff my son by this no use arise to I S because the  law do respect that there be no immediate consideration between I and I S so  if I be bind to enter into a statute before the mayor of the staple at such a  day for the Himself ritie of l and the obligee before the day accept of I a  lease of a house in satisfaction this be no plea in debt upon my obligation  and yet the end of that statute be but security of money but because the enter  into this statute it self which be the immediate act whereunto I be bind be a  corporal act which lie not in satisfaction therefore the law take no  consideration that the remote intent be for money so if I make a feoff in fee  upon condition that the feoff shall feoff over and the feoff be seize and a  dissent cast and that the feoff bind himself in a statute which statute be  discharge before the recovery of the land this be no breach of the condition  because the land be never liable to the statute and the possibility that it  shall be liable upon the recovery the law do not respect so if I feoff two  upon condition to feoff and one of they take a wife the condition be not break  and yet there be a remote possibility that the jointenant may die and then the  feme be entitle to dower so if a man purchase land in feesimple and die  without issue in the first degree the law resped dignity of sex and not  proximity and therefore the remote heir on the part of the father shall have  it before the near heir on the part Litt cap h h h m e Julius Winningtons case  over report per Le tresreuerend judge Le Snr coke lib of the mother but in any  degree paramount the first the law respect not and therefore the near heir by  the grand mother on the part of the father shall have it before the remote  heir of the grandfather on the part of the father this rule fail in covenous  act which though they be convey through many degree and reach yet the law take  heed to the corrupt beginning and count all as one entire act as if a feoff be  make of land hold by knight service to I S upon condition that within a  certain time he shall feoff I d which feoff to I d shall be to the use of the  wife of the first feoff for her jointure c this feoff be within the statute of  h nam dolus revolution non to purge in like manner this rule hold not in  criminal act except they have a full interruption because when the intention  be matter of substance and that which the law do principal behold there the  first motive will be principal regard and not the last impulsion as if I S of  malice prepense discharge a pistol at I d and miss he whereupon he throw down  his pistol and fly and I d pursue he to kill he whereupon he turn and kill I d  with a dagger if the law shall consider the last impulsive cause it shall say  that it be in his own de fence but the law be otherwise for it be but a  pursuance execution of the first murderous intent but if I S have fall down  his dagger draw and I d have fall by haste upon his dagger there I d have be  felon de see and I S shall go quit also you may not confound the act with the  execution of the act nor the entire act with the last part or the consummation  of the act for if a seize enter into religion the immediate cause be from the  party though the dissent be cast in law but the law do but execute the act  which the party procure and therefore the dissent shall not bind et such I  turning if a lease for year be make render a rend and the lessee make a feoff  of part and the lessor enter the immediate cause be from the law in respect of  the forfeiture though the entry be the act of the party but that be but the  pursuance and put in execution of the title which the law give and therefore  the rend or condition shall be apportion so in the bind of a right by a  dissent you be to consider the whole time from the seize to the dissent cast  and if at all time the person be not privilege the dissent bind Edward light  cap de discontent Eliz h foe die and therefore if a feme covert be seize and  the baron die and she take a new husband and then the dissent be cast or if a  man that be not infra maria be seize and he return into England and go over  sea again and then a dissent be cast this dissent bind because of the interim  when the person may have enter and the law respect not the state of the person  at the last time of the dissent cast but a continuance from the very seize to  the dissent so if baron and feme be and they join in a feoff of the wife land  render a rend and the baron die and the feme take a new husband before any  rend day and he accept the rend the feoff be affirm for ever