gentleman case it be to be observe that the word of a Writ of right direct to  the lord of a manor be Pracipimus flute quoth plenum rectum to hold a de b de  to make one messuagio c and the word of a Writ of justice be king vic S health  praec flute quoth justice a quoth just without dilation  To give back b l c  and so of other writ which be Vicountiel so the Writ of droit close be direct  to the lord of the manor Pracipimus flute quoth secundum experience manor c  plenum rectum to hold c de to make one messuagio and the writ be in the same  word when they be direct to the bailiff of a manor and upon the word aforesaid  it be object that in such case the lord or the bailiff or the sheriff be judge  for they have authority by the king Writ and the writ be direct to they and  not to the suitor and therefore it be say that the difference be when the plea  be in ancient demesne court baron or county court without writ there the  suitor be judge but when the writ be direct to the lord or bailiff or sheriff  by which they be command to do right and justice to the party there they be  judge also it be say that by force of justice a plea may be hold in the county  above forty shilling and therefore it be reason that judge shall be appoint  than the suitor who of common right be judge of small thing under forty  shilling and to this purpose be some opinion in tempt Edward title Det Edward  b Henry title return Henry a Edward where Finchden hold where the  admeasurement of power be make before the sheriff the sheriff be judge but  upon consideration of all the book it be resolve that in none of the say case  the lord of a manor or the bailiff or sheriff be judge but be the plea hold by  writ or without writ the suitor be judge and the reason why the writ shall be  direct to the lord or sheriff c be because the court baron be the lord court  and the county court be the sheriff court and therefore it be great reason the  writ be direct to he to who the court do belong to the end he see two thing  perform to hold his court that justice and right be therein do to the party  that he answer the profit of his court which belong to he but in case where  they hold plea by force of the king writ it do not change the nature and  jurisdiction of the court for as these without writ be not court of record so  when the plea be hold by writ the court be of the same nature for upon a  judgement give in both case a writ of false judgement lie and not a writ of  error but if the writ which of record shall constitute a new judge videlicet  the lord in the one case and the sheriff c in the other then the authority of  the judge be by the king Writ which be of record the court as to this purpose  shall be also of record quoth be clearly falsehood for without question as it  appear by f n b and all the book a writ of false judgement lie in such case  although the plea be hold by writ also the king writ can alter the  jurisdiction of the court baron county hundred c which be all court at the  commonlaw and have judge authorize and appoint in they by the law and  therefore all thing determinable in those court ought to be determine by the  judge of the same court but it be true the king may create a new court and  appoint new judge in it but after the court be establish and create the judge  of the court ought to determine the matter in the court and therefore neither  the lord of ancient demesne nor of a court baron nor the sheriff in the county  court when the plea be hold by writ of right justice admeasurement c be judge  but the suitor who be by the commonlaw be the judge of the court and therewith  agree the book in Henry Henry a Edward a Edward b Henry c and observe well the  word of the writ in the register b king a follower cur I manor de g who be de  antiquity of coronae England ut to say health come secundum law experience  infra maner who hujusmodi antiquity of coronae England as far as this  to step out ut to say usual in plea in senate the same manerior to hang come  and judgment ind reddendum sit placitatum a follower hujusmodi curiae and  judge in plea ind reddend to be for sale to go before to withhold  to become used all time drive back and there it appear that the plea do there  depend by a writ of droit close c thou mandamus c and judgment ind reddendum  come omni speed to go before c by which it appear that although the plea be  hold by writ yet the suitor be the only judge it appear also by the say book  that in a hundred court the suitor be judge and so the law be well resolve in  a case wherein there be variance in opinion in our book but in some case the  sheriff be make judge by parliament as in redisseisin by the statute of Merton  cap and all his proceed by force of that Act be of record and a writ of error  lie of a judgement give against he c vide Edward in a court of Pipowders the  steward be judge Henry send for Edward a in the leet the steward and in the  tear the sheriff judge Henry Henry Henry in the court of Marshalsea the  steward and marshal of the king house be judge Edward b f n b b Edward b Henry  Henry Artic super Chartas cap