section fee warranty part also it be speak in the end of the say statute of  glou cester which speak of the alienation with warranty make by the tenant by  the courtesy in this from also in the same manner the heir of the woman after  the death of the father and mother shall not be bar of action if he demand the  heritage or the marriage of his mother by writ of entry that his father alien  in his mother time whereof no fine be levy in the king court and so by force  of the same statute if the husband of the wife alien the heritage or marriage  of his wife in fee with warranty c by his deed in the country it be clear law  that this warranty shall not bar the heir unless he have asset by dissent  whereof no fine be levy in the king court c here be three thing worthy of  observation concern the construction of statute first that a it be the most  natural and genuine exposition of a statute to construe one part of the  statute by another part of the same statute for that best express the meaning  of the maker as here the question upon the general word of the statute be  whether a fine levy only by a husband seize in the right of his wife with  warranty shall bar the heir without asset and it be well expound by the former  part of the act whereby it be enact that alienation make by tenant by the  courtesy with warranty shall not bar the heir unless asset of cend and  therefore it shall be inconvenient to intend the statute in such manner as  that he that have nothing but in the right of his wife shall by his fine levy  with warranty bar the heir without asset and this exposition be ex  soft fleshy body parts  right of way for cattle second the word of a act of  parliament must be take in a lawful and rightful sense as here the word be  whereof no fine be levy in the king court be to be understand whereof no fine  be lawful or rightful levy in the king court and therefore b a fine levy by  the husband alone be not within the meaning of the statute for that fine shall  work a wrong to the wife but a fine levy by the husband and wife be intend by  the statute for that fine be lawful and work no wrong c so the statute of  W.2.c say ita quoth bishop church  To bring together be construe ita quoth  bishop church legitimee  To bring together and the like in a number of other  case in our book and general the rule be quoth non apply hindrance quoth de  jure non cast or draw lots execution three that construction must be make of a  statute in suppression of the mischief and in advancement of the remedy as by  this case it appear for a fine levy by the husband only be within the letter  of the law but the mischief be the heir be bar of the inheritance of his  mother by the warranty of his father without asset and this act intend to  apply a remedy videlicet that it shall not bar unless there be asset and  therefore they be chief be to be suppress and the remedy advance et who  to hang in letter  to hang in made from bark as often before have be say